Sergei Shoigu noted the growing capabilities of the armed forces of Russia and Belarus

Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said that the increased combat readiness of the troops of the Russian Federation and Belarus has become relevant in connection with the new stage of activation of the troops of the North Atlantic military bloc near the borders of the Union State of Russia and Belarus. According to Shoigu, the joint exercises “2015 Union Shield” conducted showed that the capabilities of the Russian Armed Forces and the Armed Forces of Belarus have increased.


Speaking at the joint board of defense ministries of the two countries, Sergei Shoigu said (quote RIA News):

In the context of the intensification of NATO near the Russian borders, we were faced with the task of increasing the combat readiness and combat capability of military authorities, troops of Russia and Belarus for joint actions in repelling aggression against the Union State, and improving field training of troops in carrying out missions. The doctrine showed that the capabilities of the armed forces to ensure the military security of the Union State have increased.


According to the Russian minister, great attention was paid and continues to be paid to the organization of interaction between the Russian and Belarusian units of the force grouping.

Sergei Shoigu noted the growing capabilities of the armed forces of Russia and Belarus


The Russian minister noted that a mechanism for exchanging information in the field of advanced technologies and developments will be established between Moscow and Minsk. The plans include the inclusion of 120 Russian and Belarusian enterprises in a unified system of advanced research.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Vladimyrych 21 October 2015 13: 20 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    And if there was a base of the Russian Aerospace Forces in general, the potential above the roof would be ... But Butsko really! Hotz cannot eat money already. fool
    Quote: vovanpain
    Belarus is a kindred nation, few doubt it.

    and I have no doubt. I did not write about Belarusians at all. I only noted about Butska. Well, I love this character I can’t do with myself. laughing
    1. vovanpain 21 October 2015 13: 24 New
      • 12
      • 0
      +12
      Kezhugetych is generally diplomatic, what today can be expected from the dad and the dad himself does not seem to know, but few people doubt that Russia and Belarus are kindred peoples.
      1. kil 31 21 October 2015 13: 33 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        In the context of NATO’s intensification near the Russian borders, we were faced with the task of increasing the combat readiness and combat readiness of the military command and control bodies, the troops of Russia and Belarus towards joint action in repelling aggression against the Union State
        In plain text he said who the aggressor is. N A T O
      2. _Vladislav_ 21 October 2015 13: 38 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: vovanpain
        Kezhugetych is generally diplomatic, what today can be expected from the dad and the dad himself does not seem to know, but few people doubt that Russia and Belarus are kindred peoples.

        I think it’s not just a matter of money (or maybe not so much). A military base, whatever it may be, is always an instrument of influence on the life of the country in whose territory this base is located (both military and political influence).

        Our one military base in the Crimea, and that’s all - it’s all about the hat. And Old Man saw this, and is not mentally ready to give up part of his interests.

        On the other hand, it is not known who will replace the Old Man (and most importantly, how he will come). In this sense, one “small” Russian military base could secure Russian interests in Belarus. And the interests are big. WE ARE ALLIES. Moreover (I will not say for Belarus), and Russia in the future will represent Belarus in its composition. In the end, this was the goal of the UNION of Russia and Belarus itself.

        Thinking out loud:
        Perhaps the Old Man does not want absolute integration with Russia, in view of the fact that he has already chosen a receiver and does not want to give up power. That's why he says: there is no need for the aerospace forces, you give planes, but Belarusians will sit there.
        He does not want to see pilots in his country (and not only pilots, the base must also be protected), carrying out the orders of another supreme commander in chief. Not morally ready.
        1. veksha50 21 October 2015 14: 52 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: _Vladislav_
          Thinking out loud:



          I completely agree with you ... That's why the Union State now exists more on paper than it really is ... Ambition, ambition, ambition ...

          PS The ambitions that did not prevent the pope from kissing the handle ... Brrrr .... Janus, anyway ...
      3. rf xnumx 21 October 2015 13: 46 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: vovanpain
        Kezhugetych is generally diplomatic, what today can be expected from the dad and the dad himself does not seem to know, but few people doubt that Russia and Belarus are kindred peoples.

        He knows everything, just a person’s character is like that and so he will always be with Russia
        1. veksha50 21 October 2015 14: 53 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: treble 72019
          He all knows



          By the way, the lower phrase spoken by him would not hurt to follow himself too ...
      4. Altona 21 October 2015 19: 07 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: vovanpain
        Kezhugetych is generally diplomatic

        -------------------
        Of course ... As regards the Armed Forces of Belarus, it’s generally difficult to flatter yourself ... It seems that they exist, but there’s no kakbe ... The material base is the same as the Ukrainian, if not worse ...
    2. MDesant 21 October 2015 13: 25 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Worse than smart enemies are only cunning friends.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Minsker 21 October 2015 14: 25 New
        • -6
        • 0
        -6
        Well, whose *** is there a trickier question. All the wars that passed through our territory were not our wars. Russians fought against someone there. And the scorched earth remained to us. Want to have a buffer again? And live in it weakly? You reproach with money. Yes, if Old Man wanted to get hold of the NATO base in Orsha - there would be much more money received than from Russia, I assure you.
        1. veksha50 21 October 2015 14: 59 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Minsk dweller
          All the wars that passed through our territory were not our wars



          I do not want to offend you ... However - "it was not our war" - too much is said ...

          If someone spoke out against Lukashenko’s cunning policy, this should not be taken against Belarusians as a people and a nation ...

          And you yourself have long since separated yourself from the USSR and Russia ??? From what year? Since 1991 ??? Since 1917 ??? or in general from four hundred and fifteenth years BC ???

          I have a lot of friends and comrades among Belarusians, and never (for 46 years somewhere) between us about each one’s nationality and thoughts ... We always felt united and equal ...

          And now, when you, for reproaching your president, said that all the wars on the territory of Belarus were not yours, but Russian, then you yourself have already made a section between us ...
          1. Minsker 21 October 2015 15: 17 New
            • -1
            • 0
            -1
            Do not start. I also spoke not about a simple Russian man, but about those who now rule in Russia. Deal with the oligarchs, the "family", the Hero of Russia Ramzan Akhmatovich and others. They now rule in the Russian Federation and we are not on the road with them. You have already developed some kind of immunity to them, and for us they are like a Martian infection. Immediately cover everything.
            Now imagine: you live with a neighbor on the same site. Both suppose hard workers and wear the same sweatshirts and similar slippers and T-shirts. Only one is more ambitious and the second is small. And then the big man says: move to my apartment. Together, it’s more convenient to have a drink and sing songs, and indeed it’s easier to beat off a goat from a neighboring entrance. And if you don’t move, then you say to me the enemy and I don’t know you!
            Rave? Then why is it not considered nonsense in relations between states? Why can't you just live together and work together but still in your apartments? This is for those who enter the Republic of Belarus into the Russian Federation as a subject of the federation.
            1. veksha50 21 October 2015 19: 37 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: Minsk dweller
              This is for those who enter the Republic of Belarus into the Russian Federation as a subject of the federation.



              Well, I didn’t even stutter about it ...

              But in general - let's not bark ... politicians - came, oncpali and left, we - the people - remain ...

              Each nation has its own problems ...

              PS Russia and Belarus didn’t have enough time to clear up ... Not at the level of politicians, but at the national level ...
              1. Minsker 22 October 2015 10: 14 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Absolutely agree. )))
    3. Penetrator 21 October 2015 13: 27 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Vladimir
      But Butsk very! Hotz cannot eat money already.

      Lyaksandr Rygorovich - the hammer! The interests of his country, except for defense, are also financial. I am sure that there will be a Russian base, but he will pull the dough normally from us. However, it’s not in your pocket, but for the benefit of the Belarusian state.
      1. MIKHAN 21 October 2015 13: 31 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Still, Shoigu did well .. (although not a regular military man) .. He has organizational abilities and, most importantly, modesty! He turned gray, such a responsibility on his shoulders ...
      2. Motherland Russia 21 October 2015 13: 42 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        The logic is in your words, given the pace of theft at the new cosmodrome and the story of Vasilyeva.
        Together with spending planning, it is necessary to envisage a "head removal" from those who will master our hard-earned money.
      3. veksha50 21 October 2015 15: 01 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Penetrator
        Sure that Russian base will bebut dough normally he will pull us. However, it’s not in your pocket, but for the benefit of the Belarusian state.



        Time, time is running out ... And here ambition is the worst adviser ...
    4. By001261 21 October 2015 15: 12 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Calm comrades, it will not be all at once for you.
  2. katalonec2014 21 October 2015 13: 20 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    We do not refuse cooperation, we are stronger together.
  3. Reserve officer 21 October 2015 13: 23 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Whoever said about Lukashenko, but Belarus is really an ally. And so many interests coincide.
    Of course, I understand that this is now a separate country. But I understand with my mind. But in my heart I understand another thing - all the divisions are artificial, the people are one.
  4. lukke 21 October 2015 13: 24 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Bringing the interaction of the Armed Forces to the proper level of such countries as Russia, Kazakhstan and Belarus will only strengthen our defense. The withdrawal of our armies to common standards is a costly process, and if Kazakhstan is solvent, then Belarus falls on our "shoulders" in this matter. Although in matters of geopolitics it is still beneficial to us)
    1. veksha50 21 October 2015 15: 02 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: lukke
      then Belarus in this matter falls on our "shoulders".



      Well, do not shift the solution of these problems to the shoulders of NATO ???
  5. Lt. Air Force stock 21 October 2015 13: 25 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    But the pace of rearmament needs to be increased, due to global import substitution in many respects, Russia is lagging behind the deadlines, there’s a hitch in the engines for ships, with a multi-purpose submarine Yasen-M hitch, PakFa is also not very quickly brought to mind, what do the engines of the second stage already say in metal, and not on the drawings, but on the plane they will appear only after 5 years (5 years for testing is a lot).
    Why global import substitution coincided precisely with the massive rearmament of the Russian army is not clear, apparently in order to again stall everything.
    1. veksha50 21 October 2015 15: 07 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Lt. Air Force stock
      Why global import substitution coincided precisely with the massive rearmament of the Russian army is not clear, apparently in order to again stall everything.


      Hmm ... So the army and navy began to revive, Russia began to show its teeth in geopolitical matters - here you have the sanctions, and from them the need for import substitution has sunk ...

      So after all, there would be no sanctions, until now we would have imported components and equipment on our military equipment ...

      Look - Western business (including industrialists) has already howled, talked about Russia stopping its import substitution and returning to trade relations with them ... They are ready to sell us ALL, including machine-tool products we need and engineering ... However - this asks for business, but not for politicians at the helm of power structures ...
  6. katalonec2014 21 October 2015 13: 34 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Lt. Air Force stock
    Why global import substitution coincided precisely with the massive rearmament of the Russian army is not clear, apparently in order to again stall everything.

    Well, with this it’s just understandable, Western countries are not blind, they visit our armament exhibitions, they know about the plans to rearm the Army and Navy ... they are scared, Europe can’t oppose us even today without America, it is weak and does not deny it. They did all that would disrupt the plans for the rearmament of the Army, but I'm sure we can do it, we just have no other choice.
  7. MIKHAN 21 October 2015 13: 39 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Come on Old Man do not squeeze there ... Partisans are one thing, but a real combat-ready army is different and the money is not small!
  8. roskot 21 October 2015 14: 06 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    In the context of NATO’s activation near the Russian borders, we were faced with the task of increasing combat readiness and combat readiness

    Ears should always be kept on top of the head, and preferably with a gun.
  9. Minsker 21 October 2015 14: 21 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    No need to lads us very much to include yourself! Let at least somewhere there will be good roads, natural food and there will be no chocks and oligarchs. You can be friends with families, without moving into one apartment. Housing problem spoils people!
    1. Dry_T-50 21 October 2015 18: 09 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Minsk dweller
      No need to lads us very much to include yourself! Let at least somewhere there will be good roads, natural food and there will be no chocks and oligarchs. You can be friends with families, without moving into one apartment. Housing problem spoils people!

      Plus, although I respect Kadyrov
      PS On the minuses of imperial wise men do not pay attention. Just people are stuck in time
      1. Minsker 22 October 2015 10: 17 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Russian man is categorical and harsh by nature! )). Like its sharp continental climate)). But history and weather taught us not to wave an ax right away, but it will look further)). As for Kadyrov, my personal opinion is that Moscow pays tribute to him. Under the guise of friendship but ... tribute!
      2. Minsker 22 October 2015 10: 17 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Russian man is categorical and harsh by nature! )). Like its sharp continental climate)). But history and weather taught us not to wave an ax right away, but it will look further)). As for Kadyrov, my personal opinion is that Moscow pays tribute to him. Under the guise of friendship but ... tribute!
  10. Masya masya 21 October 2015 14: 28 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Two is still better than one ...
  11. Andrey NM 21 October 2015 14: 30 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Kuzhugetovich steered the Ministry of Emergencies - the organization was developing, Kuzhugetovich stood at the helm of the Ministry of Defense - the army and navy went uphill. Is it time to push aside one lover of gadgets and make room for a more specific comrade?
  12. veksha50 21 October 2015 14: 47 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    "The plans include the inclusion of 120 Russian and Belarusian enterprises into a single system of advanced research"...

    Just come on, guys, without unnecessary showdowns - who has more, is thicker, who is more, and who has invested less ...

    Work for the result ... In unity - power, in disconnection - collapse and possible destruction ...
    1. Minsker 21 October 2015 15: 07 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      That is true. In any case, there will be a war or not, and such work will significantly advance both science and technology.
    2. Minsker 21 October 2015 15: 07 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      That is true. In any case, there will be a war or not, and such work will significantly advance both science and technology.
  13. remy 21 October 2015 15: 02 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    when already infa will be on the supply of S-400 air defense systems this year ????? and where exactly?
  14. Steppe 21 October 2015 15: 23 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It is good that our handsome minister is such a fine fellow. It is necessary to increase the combat potential. In order for NATO to smash all this in bricks starting from the USA and Great Britain, if they turn to us.