Analyst: the United States does not have enough money to replace military equipment

52
Due to a shortage of funds, the American command has no real plans to replace earlier than 2030 tanks Abrams, the Bradley BMP and Paladin self-propelled guns, writes James Hasick, an expert at the Brent Scowcroft Center for International Security, in an article for National Interest. His article cites RIA News.



“Many years ago, we were limited by technology, today we are limited by the lack of money,” Hasik quotes General Bassett, who buys ground weapons for the US Army.

The analyst points out that at the recent AUSA 2015 exhibition in the United States, “manufacturers presented cheaper, lighter vehicles” that “do not have the necessary protection against landmines and do not have adequate maneuverability”. He also notes that the Americans still "do not have a light high-precision weapons».

“The military is interested in compensating for the lack of firepower not only with missiles, but also at the expense of light tanks, like M8 Buford, which was also presented at the exhibition,” the author writes. “The tank was ordered by the army back in the middle of 90's to replace the M551 Sheridan model, but by the year of 1996, when the program was discontinued, the manufacturer managed to collect only six copies.”

The army leadership at the exhibition noted that the armed forces "have to deal with the creation of interference, cyber attacks and high-precision enemy missiles - threats that were not considered in the 2008 year." However, according to the expert, the generals should pay attention "not only to the innovativeness of the producers' ideas, but also to their feasibility, because when you have no money, you have to think."
52 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    21 October 2015 12: 27
    Yes, no one is missing ... such is life. Everything will never be enough.
    1. +7
      21 October 2015 12: 28
      Many years ago we were limited by technology, today we are limited by a lack of money

      Tomorrow you will be limited by the lack of brains! wassat

      No money - no scientists and engineers !!!
      So get ready !!!
      Every day is not Sunday.
      1. +10
        21 October 2015 12: 38
        All mattress funds invested in US military achievements laughing
        1. +8
          21 October 2015 12: 55
          All 700 gigawes of the budget (well, or not all, but 90%) were bitten by the famous terrorist Popil Ottatov.
          In general, how is it necessary to phallomorphize in order to say that there is no money when the military budget is equal to the total budget of the Russian Federation, tea houses, GB and Bundes? wassat
          1. +3
            21 October 2015 13: 16
            So this budget mainly goes to social programs and the maintenance of 8 hundred bases around the world. Only the fleet is fully supplied - this is the main strike force and power of the United States. The states do not plan to fight on their land, and therefore a fairly small percentage of their ground forces is in a normal and alert state. If we spent as much money on MO as mattresses, then for a long time space cruisers would be in service with us, and not just aircraft carriers.
            1. 0
              21 October 2015 13: 46
              I think that they would make such medicine and education that any enemies would surrender. Militarily cheaper and more efficient.
          2. +1
            21 October 2015 13: 19
            Quote: Thronekeeper
            Generally, how do you need phallomorphso that with a military budget equal to the total budget of the Russian Federation, tea houses, GB and Bundes say that there is no money?
            -Huge economy. Baz does not count. Ten aircraft bearing marine groups. Afghanistan, Iraq ... IG now really needs to be fucked ...

            People are jumping off the buck, they don’t just want to buy the treasury - they are also starting to merge! Byad ...
            1. 0
              21 October 2015 13: 53
              11 fleets... Which include from one to 3 AUG. The 6th Fleet in Mediterranean, for example, has 2 AUGs on a permanent basis and a task force with AB "George Bush" (whatever you call the ship, so it will sail) for reinforcement.
              With a fair devaluation of the role of aircraft carrier groups, we can say that our potential partners are doing everything through Asia. After the decommissioning of carrier-based interceptors in 2003 and the introduction of Onyx and its clones / export versions of 2012-2013 and 5th generation air defense systems into service by the Russian and third-country navies, the AUG turned into a police club from a weapon of superiority. While the "Ohio" APRKSN at the berths are rotting, no funds are allocated for hunters and the conversion of strategic submarines into attack missile carriers. The bases are not as expensive as they seem. Basically, terrorist Budget spending goes to corrupt wunderworld R&D in the Air Force and the Navy and to maintain an "exceptional" aircraft carrier pipiska, which they are compared with everyone.
              Dempsey and Carter have more than once been pushing through the reduction of amerflot, like suitcases without a handle, but this is the sacred cow.
              1. 0
                21 October 2015 14: 19
                Quote: Thronekeeper
                11 fleets.
                “Only six.”
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +10
      21 October 2015 12: 38
      So let them stand on the porch, maybe someone will give alms.
    4. 0
      21 October 2015 12: 57
      Quote: bogart047
      that is life

      But I will not pay for unhappy amers laughing
    5. 0
      21 October 2015 13: 05
      So they have a vicious circle: if not war, they have a problem with money and influence on the rest of the world, but as soon as the war starts, the money that is earned goes again to this war.
    6. +1
      21 October 2015 15: 00
      What? Is the machine already smoking? laughing
      1. 0
        22 October 2015 09: 07
        clichés began to fade laughing
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. +11
    21 October 2015 12: 29
    Many years ago we were limited by technology, today we are limited by a lack of money ------ It's high time to limit all your anti-human policies !!!!!! US must be destroyed !!!!!!
    1. +5
      21 October 2015 12: 34
      Quote: Hammer 75
      Many years ago we were limited by technology, today we are limited by a lack of money ------ It's high time to limit all your anti-human policies !!!!!! US must be destroyed !!!!!!

      The main tribunal after Nuremberg so that it was
    2. +4
      21 October 2015 12: 50
      Quote: Hammer 75
      US must be destroyed !!!!!!

      Do you want to destroy all 320 million US citizens? The bulk of the population seems to have nothing to do with it, and the American political and financial elite will suffer the least in this case. And the true culprits, the puppeteers, on the contrary, will win. By the way, all mankind will have a very sour experience with the immediate destruction of the "world hegemon" - it will collapse with such a crash that it will crush everyone with debris.
      So, before throwing such slogans, it is necessary at least elementary to turn on the brain, and not "shout" with or without reason. And then you are no different from the meager Svidomites, who on the "Censor" call for the destruction of "rash-parashki"
      1. +4
        21 October 2015 13: 02
        Unfortunately, there is more of patriotism than patriotism itself.
  4. +6
    21 October 2015 12: 29
    Oh come on money is not enough lol Was the printing press turned off for non-payment of electricity? good
    1. -1
      21 October 2015 13: 04
      Yes, here ...
  5. +15
    21 October 2015 12: 30
    Well, where’s the money Zin? This is the country with the largest military budget. It seems like they are stealing, our stool with bl ... they seem to be indignant at their battalion.
  6. +5
    21 October 2015 12: 30
    As usual, "Give me money"!
    1. +2
      21 October 2015 12: 41
      Quote: filalex79
      Normally, "Give me money"!

      I completely agree with your remark. Once upon a time, reading American tech. magazine, I came across an article where it was indicated that the losses from "white-collar" crime, that is, in our opinion from corruption, exceed the losses of all other types of crime. It is not for nothing that the United States has the world's largest GULAG, and naturally the world's largest corruption and crime as such.
  7. +2
    21 October 2015 12: 30
    They will print, this is the USA!
  8. +1
    21 October 2015 12: 33
    Yes, and why should they change weapons are still fighting with weak natives and Bedouins
  9. +1
    21 October 2015 12: 34
    And they, that are so outdated, what would they urgently update?
    1. 0
      21 October 2015 12: 39
      First, give money, and secondly, when you scattered troops around the world, there will naturally be not enough money, which you were not rich. It can leave bases on strategic directions, then money and technology will be over the eyes.
      1. 0
        21 October 2015 13: 06
        Yes, the troops are something like, not their own, PMCs.
    2. +1
      21 October 2015 12: 51
      Quote: AtenON
      And they, that are so outdated, what would they urgently update?


      Yes, no, perhaps, Dear Victor, the equipment indicated in the article is quite combat-ready and has both operational and modernization resources. In my opinion, this is, like everywhere else, a desire to make money on new purchases, and lobbyists of corporations that produce military equipment are simply using the military for their own purposes. And, of course, not free, judging by the latest "groaning" of the US military command.

      Something like that, Dear. hi
  10. +3
    21 October 2015 12: 34
    By the way, you always need to think, and not just when there is no money. There is nothing flattery for everyone with their values. Sit behind a puddle there and the World will become better.
  11. +2
    21 October 2015 12: 36
    "... when you have no money, you have to think ..."
    According to this logic, Ukrainians are the most thinking nation, after Somalia, of course?! Yes, okay ...
    1. 0
      21 October 2015 13: 07
      I grinned.
  12. +1
    21 October 2015 12: 36
    Quote: treble 72019
    Quote: Hammer 75
    Many years ago we were limited by technology, today we are limited by a lack of money ------ It's high time to limit all your anti-human policies !!!!!! US must be destroyed !!!!!!

    The main tribunal after Nuremberg so that it was
  13. +1
    21 October 2015 12: 37
    And cut half your military bases, and the money will appear ... Weak? The world will be calmer.
  14. +1
    21 October 2015 12: 39
    “Many years ago we were limited by technology, today we are limited by the lack of money"- quotes Hasik to General Bassett, engaged in the procurement of ground weapons for the US Army

    laughing
  15. 0
    21 October 2015 12: 39
    now pin.do.sy will go around the world with outstretched hands and lamenting at the same time ... give the impoverished nation for rearmament ... this confirms the people's observation, whoever you will be led to (ukrin), that will be filled ...
  16. 0
    21 October 2015 12: 46
    Yankees, I need to eat and stick my nose into other people's affairs ...
  17. 0
    21 October 2015 12: 47
    Almost 600 billion military budget. How no money ?!
    What are they doing with this money?
    1. +1
      21 October 2015 15: 36
      Quote: ArcanAG
      Almost 600 billion military budget. How no money ?!
      What are they doing with this money?

      the "stove" of the "fight against terrorism" was flooded and the dollars were burned. for this case, bucks can be written off by wagons. in Syria trained 60 (SIXTY) people at a cost of $ 500 million. Do you believe that $ 10 million was spent for each student? in this case, the terminator at the sight of such a "sodat" should hide and sit, praying to the cyberdine that he would not be found.
  18. +1
    21 October 2015 12: 48
    In the US military budget, the phrase "we do not have enough money to replace a tank and armored vehicles" looks like a mockery. Other countries with much more modest budgets should probably complain about "we do not have enough to replace wooden clubs with new ones."
    But apparently such bad phrases are rolled among those to whom they are addressed
  19. +1
    21 October 2015 12: 54
    These are just words that are far from reality: the US spends the main expenditures of the military budget on the Navy, and there are no special cuts: the construction of aircraft carriers and submarines is going according to plan, and the ordeal with Zamwalt was initially fat, since it did not go to the detriment of the construction of the Berks. The USA has not been producing tanks for more than 20 years and it is strange that the "expert" does not know this, but in the USA all tank factories have been closed for a long time, there are only repair factories that are engaged in the maintenance and modernization of equipment. And why, if any American is firmly convinced that Abrams is the BEST. And before the advent of Armata, they had no reason to develop something new. In addition, I recall the recent results of the competition to replace the Humvee, which, apparently, according to the "expert", means a reduction in costs. The article is clearly ordered and its purpose is simple to disgrace - to justify the allocation of new funds for new developments and purchases of weapons. It is strange that the author believes in such stupidity intended for the American layman.
  20. 0
    21 October 2015 12: 57
    they have everything, just a cut of funds continues. only on a colossal scale.
  21. +1
    21 October 2015 12: 58
    I read the post, looked at the table and realized that I did not understand anything.
    List of countries by military spending for 2014 according to SIPRI [1]
    1 USA 610,0
    2 PRC 216,0
    3 Russia 84,5
    4 Saudi Arabia 80,8
    Having a military budget less than 5 times the state budget, we don’t especially complain about a shortage, but should they be helped? What would the Americans say if we had such a budget? ... Would you completely dissolve the snot?
    I suggest they regret and sympathize ...
    1. 0
      21 October 2015 15: 39
      Quote: russmensch
      We have a military budget less than the state's almost 5 times not particularly complain about the lack of

      almost at 8. there was a table, the Amer’s military budget exceeds the total military budget of the TEN COUNTRIES following the USA (in terms of budget size).
  22. 0
    21 October 2015 13: 11
    Yes, you don’t have to take everything verbatim. Just still they freeze a couple of hundred lard on an anti-Russian wave. Americans don’t open their mouths for free. Look how they spread Europe with sanctions. (for ISIS carts) -and in the wake (lo and behold), General Motors went up the hill. So all these complaints are a complete fiction and a screen.
  23. 0
    21 October 2015 13: 32
    "... today we are limited by a lack of money," Hasik quotes General Bassett, who purchases ground weapons for the US Army.


  24. 0
    21 October 2015 14: 53
    Yes, that the Americans would not have enough money for something, as it is not believed. The Fed will print as many as you like without any problems. laughing
  25. 0
    21 October 2015 14: 57
    The power-saw bench on the budget works round-the-clock, without lunch and in any weather !!! Keep Mericosa so !!!
  26. 0
    21 October 2015 15: 32
    belay Does the US have no money? But what about the printing press?
  27. +4
    21 October 2015 15: 56
    I agree. Ablo is knocked out of taxpayers. And in general, Russia is just a gift for the Pentagon. When the alliance collapsed, they were confused. The DPRK, Saddam, Benya Laden, etc., tried all of them. Russians! Although in a truncated form Soyuz-light, but the bear's strength is full. And let's squeal - "The Russians are coming!" And to the Congress - "Money! Give money!" our General Staff. Think, brothers, think!
  28. 0
    21 October 2015 16: 43
    Quote: bogart047
    Yes, no one is missing ... such is life. Everything will never be enough.

    Yeah, with the money and he can. You here (USA), try to create something sensible without money.
  29. +4
    21 October 2015 18: 50
    Not enough money? That's nice. And to extend this state until 2050. And in general half of the American army should be located on the east coast of their continent. Looking longingly at the waters of the Atlantic Ocean ... The second half should do the same on the Pacific coast .. .Well, let the fleet patrol the Bermuda Triangle ... Then, the world will become calmer ... And Europe will reduce its ambition.
  30. 0
    21 October 2015 18: 53
    Yes, you just need to think with your head and not assholes .. laughing