Commander 6-m fleet: Russian submarines must always be the focus of the US Navy

Russian submarines are constantly being improved and the United States should pay special attention to this fact. RIA News statement of the 6th commander fleet James Foggo




“We are following with great attention the more active movement and operations of the Russian armed forces. This applies to both surface and submarine fleets, ”said Foggo.

“Russia has always fully allocated funds for its submarines, and as they developed, they became better. They have become more invisible and more advanced as opponents. Therefore, we must more closely monitor them and control our presence in the submarine zone ",
he declared.

Another admiral, Peter Hudson, being the commander of the NATO Navy, said about this: “The Russian fleet is more confident and assertive and pays more attention to the expeditionary forces. Operations in the Baltic and Black Seas, in the Eastern Mediterranean, and in the Indian Ocean indicate the significance that Russia attaches to its armed forces. ”

He noted that NATO increased the number of naval exercises by 35%. At the same time, "special attention was paid to developing the skills needed in a collision with an advanced enemy, such as Russia," Hudson said.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

51 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Andrey Yuryevich 21 October 2015 11: 46 New
    • 17
    • 0
    +17
    Commander 6-m fleet: Russian submarines must always be the focus of the US Navy
    for this they are in the Hudson and go! yes
    1. Vend 21 October 2015 11: 50 New
      • 14
      • 0
      +14
      Russian submarines must be constantly in the spotlight of the U.S. Navy

      Find them first and then watch laughing
      1. Truth 21 October 2015 12: 08 New
        • 12
        • 0
        +12
        Quote: Wend
        Find them first and then watch

        A worthless neighbor, constantly doing you dirty tricks, should always be aware that in case of outright arrogance he is guaranteed to rake in the face, his teeth will be knocked out and his ribs broken.
        So their worries are clear ...
        1. _Vladislav_ 21 October 2015 13: 16 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Andrew Y.
          for this they are in the hudson and go

          Yes indeed, it was the case that the Russian nuclear submarines surfaced suddenly all of a sudden (and in some cases this can be regarded as a demonstration of strength). And in principle, being in neutral waters close to the territory of other states is a common element of combat training.
          But the fact that the boat was discovered is very bad in itself, in fact, it is a failure of the task.

          It is no secret that the US nuclear submarines are also off the coast of Russia, and the fact that recently the Russian Navy has not been able to reveal a single one indicates that the Americans are acting quite professionally (if not better).

          The Americans pay great attention to this component, since in addition to the possibility of using ballistics and cruise missiles, it is necessary to protect the ACG (of which there are ten). It is no coincidence that they have nuclear submarines with non-strategic weapons already 53. P.E. when a Russian nuclear submarine enters the voyage, two or even three nuclear submarines of a likely enemy take it under surveillance.

          And pessimism was added to them by the entry into operation of the nuclear submarine of project 885. Experts from many countries recognize it as the best. And if such a (and indeed any) submarine returned from a long voyage and went unnoticed, each such incident for the American military command ends with organizational issues.

          But again, American submarines also rummage along our shores. And it is sometimes difficult to calculate them because of the large extent of the territorial waters of the Russian Federation. + We all stupidly do not have enough PL-observers. P.E. it is very correct in this regard to develop military infrastructure at the North Pole, which of course is being done.
          1. g1v2 21 October 2015 13: 40 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Well, it's too early to clap your hands. If with strategists we have even less - 6 dolphins are modernized, 3 boreas are built, 3 squids will be deducted as new boreas arrive, then with multipurpose apl, everything is not very good. With the exception of the first ash, only 8 antees more or less meet the tasks assigned to modern apl and everything needs to be modernized. 4 Pikes will be written off until 2020 due to unsuitability for modernization. 10 Pike-b will be modernized (with a sperm whale it is unclear - it seems they are persuading the Indians to lease it). 2 barracudas and 2 condors will also undergo modernization. Now, out of these 22 apl that will undergo modernization, 12 are either being modernized or are in the queue for modernization. Plus those that are just being repaired - 3 pcs. And in the end we get that at the moment there are only 10 apl in service, of which 2 are obsolete pikes that will be written off in the coming years. Of course there are diesel-electric submarines, but they will also be modernized. It’s too early to throw the caps over the enemy, but you shouldn’t cry either - maybe the boats after modernization will clearly strengthen our navy and eventually all of these boats plus 6 more ash trees will take their places in the fleet. However, the next 5 years will be quite complicated for the Navy, as a significant part of its composition will be repaired and modernized.
      2. vovanpain 21 October 2015 12: 12 New
        • 11
        • 0
        +11
        Quote: Wend
        Russian submarines must be constantly in the spotlight of the U.S. Navy

        Find them first and then watch laughing

        So we are watching them, but they are not behind us.
        1. Thronekeeper 21 October 2015 12: 33 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          The Admiral went a bit * that, in the case of sudden movements, one would have to observe the consequences of the Onyxes getting into the aircraft carriers, and so it was "observing". In general, the US military is much more sober, not only full of inadequacies like McKain and Hillary, but also Barack Gulagovich, who perceives the war as a computer toy in which you can always save and reboot.
      3. ivan bogomolov 21 October 2015 12: 42 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        These DEERs poured our Caspian gifts, and about our submarines, it is true that from the beginning find them.
      4. SANAY 21 October 2015 13: 34 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Will they find? The thing is different: this uncle is far from and in the course of really thinking about the safety of his sixth fleet. BUT! Americans are so mired in their "greatness" and "pride" that generally sound (for the Americans themselves) voices, in my opinion, will not be heard. And this uncle needs to be sent to retire, and then what he really thought of ...
    2. kil 31 21 October 2015 11: 54 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3

      “We are following with great attention the more active movement and operations of the Russian armed forces. This applies to both surface and submarine fleets, "
      What else does the fleet commander have to say? This is his job, and he will now ask for an increase in funds for his group. Because, as we say, he’s a “father” and he will knock out money from stupid politicians for his guys.
    3. Ilja 22 21 October 2015 12: 06 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Yeah)) and so close so you can watch them sitting in a rocking chair on the shore
      1. ivan bogomolov 21 October 2015 12: 45 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        And that would have a rocking cup holder, be sure. wassat
    4. Vadim-Skeptic 21 October 2015 12: 09 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Honestly, such statements by US generals and admirals are incomprehensible - all the actions and actions declared in the statements are carried out upon the fact of their work.

      It’s the same as I declare: “The new TTZ presents me with new challenges and I will have to carefully monitor the situation associated with the implementation of the TK with great attention and responsibility.”
      1. Россия 24 21 October 2015 12: 19 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Again they want to ask for money from the budget so that it can later be sawn. Indeed, for the observation of our submarines need money but not small.
    5. vodolaz 21 October 2015 12: 29 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Right, spray your fleet across all oceans)
  2. aszzz888 21 October 2015 11: 47 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    “We are following with great attention the more active movement and operations of the Russian armed forces. This applies to both surface and submarine fleets, ”said Foggo.


    And why there is no duty "concern of the State Department"? laughing
    1. Vladimyrych 21 October 2015 11: 50 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      They decided that the brevity of the sister of talent and the concern of the State Department began to enter into the meaning of what the admirals said laughing
    2. Kalmar 21 October 2015 12: 06 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      And why there is no duty "concern of the State Department"?

      They also traditionally forgot to add that the US Navy is horrified and now is afraid to stick out of its ports at all :)
  3. Decathlon 21 October 2015 11: 47 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    In the beginning he tensed - again “must”! Upon reading, I realized - this is fear! And the fear of the enemy will delight!
    1. Россия 24 21 October 2015 12: 12 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Not when you don’t underestimate the enemy, even though he shows fear.
  4. Air Force captain 21 October 2015 11: 47 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Like James ... Like
  5. lukke 21 October 2015 11: 47 New
    • 15
    • 0
    +15
    Well, we are "opponents"! And then all the "partner-partners"!))) I love the military - they are as straight as an oval!
  6. prabiz 21 October 2015 11: 49 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    “Russia has always fully allocated funds for its submarines, and as they developed, they became better. They have become more invisible "- Soon you will not see them at all!
  7. Denis DV 21 October 2015 11: 49 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Again! From empty to empty through a straw! De @ silt!
  8. SCHNIFER 21 October 2015 11: 50 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Definitely! Meet me in the waters of Belarus!
  9. mpzss 21 October 2015 11: 51 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    don’t touch us and it will not be necessary to keep our boats in the spotlight, otherwise they themselves admitted that we are potential enemies for them. And how they sang! as all these almost 30 years said: Yes, we are friends FOR AGE !!! let them go!
  10. Sergey-8848 21 October 2015 11: 51 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Finally I guessed why they gave him the admiral!
  11. sl22277 21 October 2015 11: 54 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    And the United States will be the focus of our submarines. And “Special Attention” requires special money, that is, Give Money! (One asks: near the Statue of Liberty, in Manhattan in 2012, there was “close” attention ...?).
  12. venaya 21 October 2015 11: 54 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The Russian fleet is more confident and assertive

    It's nice to hear such comments, I hope we hear a lot more good about our armed forces.
    1. armata37 21 October 2015 12: 12 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      The praise of the enemy must be treated carefully soldier
      1. venaya 21 October 2015 12: 31 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: armata37
        The praise of the enemy must be treated carefully soldier

        I agree, but sometimes even it's nice. Although it is in this case, you can really hope for their sincerity!
  13. olegfbi 21 October 2015 11: 56 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Well, great! Let them be watched! At the same time, our submariners will practice in real conditions! At the same time, they will receive the latest data on the operation of search engines of the US Navy!
  14. Socialism 2.0 21 October 2015 11: 57 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    It’s time to master the deep space, and not to measure between each other the length of something and watch each other
  15. Mikhail m 21 October 2015 11: 57 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    While our submarines are in the spotlight, the Chinese are developing. For example, http://lenta.ru/news/2014/12/09/kitay/. And if you take them into the center of attention, then squint is guaranteed.
  16. gjv
    gjv 21 October 2015 11: 58 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    “We are following with great attention the more active movement and operations of the Russian armed forces. This applies to both surface and submarine fleets, ”said Foggo.

    And we are watching our fleet with great attention.
    A snapshot of the first two patrol ships (frigates) moored in Baltiysk next to the modified project 11356 Admiral Essen (in front) and Admiral Grigorovich built for the Russian Navy at JSC Yantar Baltic Shipyard. The frigate Admiral Grigorovich is at the stage state tests, and "Admiral Essen" is preparing for the first exit to the factory sea trials.

    Patrol ships (frigates) of the modified project 11356 Admiral Essen (in front) and Admiral Grigorovich in Baltiysk. 19.10.2015/64/XNUMX (c) Drakon XNUMX / forums.airbase.ru

    And you, braids, better watch your "playful" fleet.
    1. Baikal 21 October 2015 12: 11 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Nice photo.
      Swans under the ships look so peaceful and symbolic good
  17. IAlex 21 October 2015 12: 04 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Well, it’s logical if they created missile defense around the Russian Federation, now the only problem for them is submarines ...
  18. BOB044 21 October 2015 12: 09 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Commander 6-m fleet: Russian submarines must always be the focus of the US Navy
    You the US Navy from fear of the Russian submarine fleet. Saved only increased purchases for personnel diapers. So you will have less stench and dirt in the fleet.
  19. Boats, like the Fleet, must be improved and be ahead of the NATO, so that we continue to quietly raise our children and grandchildren! Let OUR toast always sound: "And God forbid, that the Fleet had to fight in full force!" drinksbecause it means that the Earth is still alive! hi
  20. Corsair0304 21 October 2015 12: 14 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Extremely expected admiral's insight. Our submarines have always been a headache s. Take, for example, the famous “Hunt for Red October” by Tom Clancy - in the 90s of the last century it was written, if that! And only after 25 years ...
  21. Lelek 21 October 2015 12: 16 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    (Therefore, we should closely monitor them and control our presence in the underwater zone)

    Lornet and pills against sleep in the studio. Admiral, you see our submarine (?), But she is. bully
    (cry.)
  22. manguest 21 October 2015 12: 19 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Yes, yes, look for boats, airplanes, calibers, air defense systems, electronic warfare systems, Syria, the Arctic, the Baltic, b / Ukraine, special attention to the Strait of Hormuz and Bablmandeb, the Pacific theater of war, the Spartli islands, etc., etc. Do not let Gd miss what, Trend, we are behind)
  23. pts-m 21 October 2015 12: 21 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    you might think that the pin.do.sovskie forces drew in their bunny cards. their statements look like an excuse like ... I’m not to blame, he himself came ... finely bleating folk.
  24. zap.ural 21 October 2015 12: 28 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    just as Russian paratroopers unexpectedly ended up at the airport in Pristina, just as unexpectedly, Russian submarines find themselves where they are not waiting at all.
  25. russmensch 21 October 2015 12: 30 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I read such statements and wonder ... Well, be it one thing, then okay, but there are a lot of them about our fleet, which in their opinion can do a lot, and about our planes (even virtual battles take place), and about our missiles and about ... And it is incomprehensible that the military leaders generally cannot put all these statements one on one and understand that today is everywhere and in all directions, if anything, the Russian scribe is spinning very close ...
  26. roskot 21 October 2015 12: 33 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    We still have something to worry about. The taiga is big. And there is not a tree, then a trunk. Watch out ...
  27. Watchdog 21 October 2015 12: 37 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    More submarines, good and different !!! fellow
  28. Rossiyanin 21 October 2015 12: 46 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Hang on, Russians are coming!
  29. Maksim 21 October 2015 13: 18 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Must be, but not ... they are just off the coast of Belarus)
  30. Mama_Cholli 21 October 2015 13: 20 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Sly red-haired beast ,. our boats of the Borey project (though this is still the only one) are much quieter than the quietest Papuan submarines.
  31. olegfbi 21 October 2015 13: 23 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: _Vladislav_
    It is no secret that the US nuclear submarines are also off the coast of Russia, and the fact that recently the Russian Navy has not been able to reveal a single one indicates that the Americans are acting quite professionally (if not better).

    Where did you get this, sorry nonsense?
    The fact that in the Russian mass media there are no constant tantrums about the detection of submarines of foreign states does not mean at all that these submarines are not detected, not monitored, etc.!
    It’s just for the Great Power - Russia, to move such temper tantrums! Russian Navy just WORKS !!!
    Tantrums = lot of any imperfections and litter of the United States.

    And due to the fact that the Russian nuclear submarines, upon leaving the base, take control of 2-3 US submarines, is also nonsense!
  32. BARKHAN 21 October 2015 13: 40 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    I agree. Bablo is knocked out of taxpayers. And in general, Russia is just a present for the Pentagon. When the union broke up they were at a loss. They tried all the DPRK, Sadam, Benya Laden, etc. But all this is not the same scope, you do not gain much. And here again Russians! Though in a stripped-down Soyuz-light form, the bear has plenty of power. And let’s squeal - “Russians are coming!” And to Congress - “Money! Give money!” After all, they play with fire, earlings. All hope for our General Staff. Think, brothers, think!
  33. andron72 21 October 2015 18: 57 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    let u drown drinks