Antonov: a memorandum signed by representatives of the Russian Federation and the United States regulates the actions of all aircraft over the territory of Syria

49
A memorandum on the safety of flights in the skies over Syria, signed on Tuesday by Russia and the United States, regulates the actions of all aircraft located there and dronestransmits RIA News Post Deputy Defense Minister Anatoly Antonov.



“We consider it a positive step to sign a memorandum of understanding between the Russian Ministry of Defense and the US Department of Defense on preventing incidents and ensuring flight safety aviation during the operation in the Syrian Arab Republic, ”said Antonov.

According to him, “the document is of great practical importance, since it regulates the actions of manned and unmanned aerial vehicles in the airspace over Syria.”

“The memorandum contains a set of rules and restrictions designed to prevent incidents between Russian and US aviation,” the deputy minister added.

The Pentagon is also satisfied with the joint work done on the preparation and approval of a single document. They said that the parties were still able to agree on the establishment of a channel of communication in case of emergency.

“In the case of a downed pilot or an aircraft in an emergency, both parties must communicate with each other via the newly established channel. Further actions will be determined during the incident, ”said the representative of the military department, Michel Baldans.

Another representative of the Pentagon, Peter Cook, said at a briefing on the agreement reached on the "safe distance between the aircraft." True, he could not bring any exact data, and only suggested that these distances "should not be so close."

Cook explained that the Russians were not allowed to disclose the contents of the memorandum to the general public. “(Russia) a corresponding request was made, I don’t know what the reasons are for this,” he said.

Less than others were happy about the signing of the document in the State Department. "The signing of the memorandum, although important to ensure the safety of air operations, does not change our position and does not remove our fears," said a spokesman for the agency, John Kirby.

"The United States wants the military support of the Assad regime to cease," he explained.

"The memorandum is not a breakthrough in the political transition in Syria, ... nothing has changed in our position that there is no military solution to the civil war in Syria," said Kirby.
49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    21 October 2015 09: 13
    The memorandum is certainly good. But the powder must still be kept dry, for there is no faith in our partners for a penny.
    1. +27
      21 October 2015 09: 20
      Yes, do not care what the United States wants. Here is our answer.
    2. +2
      21 October 2015 09: 21
      This is great news! What else could please us as safety for our pilots.
      1. +4
        21 October 2015 09: 43
        To the promises and signatures of these nonsense Zaokayansky-pennies price !!!
      2. +1
        21 October 2015 10: 24
        Antonov well done.
        Calm, judicious.
        Syria, in addition to the capabilities of our weapons, showed us new faces in the General Staff.
      3. +1
        21 October 2015 11: 35
        The signing of the memorandum shows that the military can quickly agree with each other. If only politicians in the person of McCain and his ilk did not intervene in this matter.
        1. +2
          21 October 2015 13: 18
          If only politicians in the person of McCain and his ilk did not intervene in this matter.

          But actually, what are the aviation of the USA, France doing in the sky of Syria, and who else was there? Who invited them there?
          As far as I remember, there is no UN resolution on the action of international forces in Syria.
          The Russian Air Forces, I would like to say the usual Air Force, were invited by the official authorities of Syria to assist in the fight against international terrorism, ISIS.
          What are the US doing there? Violate all conceivable international laws. Or for the United States, due to its exceptional nature, everything is allowed, they did not care at all, and do what they want?
          Does the whole world dance to the tune of the USA? What is the memorandum? Here it is necessary at the UN to raise the issue of illegal actions by the United States and its satellites, their illegal actions in Syria.
    3. +1
      21 October 2015 09: 24
      Quote: ImperialKolorad
      The memorandum is certainly good. But the powder must still be kept dry, for there is no faith for our partners for nothing

      keep up the good work.
    4. +10
      21 October 2015 09: 24
      SU-30, interception of pindo drones, MQ-9 Reaper, in the sky of Syria.
      1. +5
        21 October 2015 09: 33
        Assad in Moscow now, talking with Putin. What is resolved there? Intrigued.
        1. 0
          21 October 2015 10: 13
          Quote: Bombardier
          Assad in Moscow now, talking with Putin. What is resolved there? Intrigued.

          I hope after the conversation. Assad on the world platform will say from the beach all NATO aircraft from Syrian airspace. Russian aerospace forces will monitor the implementation, otherwise the bombs are wasted air-to-air missiles turn sour. wink
        2. +1
          21 October 2015 11: 05
          Quote: Bombardier
          What is resolved there? Intrigued.

          I suppose that the conversation can go on a political settlement of the conflict, because the state of war cannot last forever, it’s a road to nowhere, it’s quite possible to replace Assad’s figure with some of his supporters, but with a slightly different solution to the conflict, Assad himself stated that if necessary, he will leave his post
      2. 0
        21 October 2015 12: 13
        Quote: figvam
        SU-30, interception of pindo drones, MQ-9 Reaper, in the sky of Syria.

        minus for a lie, no one intercepted him, past the spills and all things ...
        1. 0
          21 October 2015 13: 26
          The fourth little pig - is that FOOT-FISH, or what ?! wink
        2. 0
          21 October 2015 20: 00
          minus for lies
          Less for dumbness
          our TU-95s constantly intercept over the seas and oceans, but this does not mean that they are being shot down. In peacetime, the interceptor catches up with the target, recognizes it, takes a position for using weapons and waits for a command from the ground about further actions (knock down, force to land, etc.) in this case, the target was identified as a drone of a fsch, but could be destroyed on command from the ground.
        3. +1
          21 October 2015 20: 20
          Quote: 4-th Paradise
          Quote: figvam
          SU-30, interception of pindo drones, MQ-9 Reaper, in the sky of Syria.
          minus for a lie, no one intercepted him, past the spills and all things ...


          Why are you so tossing minuses? Do you know what this detection (radar and visual) is called INTERCEPT?

          Yes, without opening fire, without launching missiles, but this is the 100% interception ...
    5. +6
      21 October 2015 10: 30
      The United States invited Russian pilots in Syria to communicate in English.
      1. +3
        21 October 2015 10: 45
        Quote: Saburov
        The United States invited Russian pilots in Syria to communicate in English.

        Dolbo ... Do they not understand that Russian spoken does not translate into English in any way? And if translated literally - all of their decryption machines will smoke from overheating.
  2. +15
    21 October 2015 09: 15
    All these contracts are not worth the paper they are written on when it comes to mattress toppers. As they said earlier in the reports of the police - "be careful, the criminal is armed." For us, for Russia, this is now very important.
    1. +4
      21 October 2015 09: 23
      Quote: Vladimir
      All these contracts are not worth the paper on which they are written when it comes to mattress covers.


      But nonetheless. We have already completely forgotten when the United States, albeit with reluctance, signed a similar document (on its practical value, the topic of another conversation).

      Obviously, this was only possible during the period of the USSR-USA confrontation ...

      Yes, the old challenges and threats of the Cold War times "got out", but they are beginning to reckon with us ...
      1. +5
        21 October 2015 09: 29
        Any serious and working! agreements with the mattress were concluded only when there was power and industrial (and, accordingly, economic) parity. Only when the mattresses feel that they can be sent an answer on any fields of human activity only then they are negotiable. In all other cases, their contracts are not like ink papers.
  3. +2
    21 October 2015 09: 15
    Less than others were happy about the signing of the document in the State Department. "The signing of the memorandum, although important to ensure the safety of air operations, does not change our position and does not remove our fears," said a spokesman for the agency, John Kirby.


    Russia forced the United States to sign a memorandum? laughing
  4. +5
    21 October 2015 09: 16
    The only question is whether the possessed mattresses will abide by it !? As you know - they are liars ...
  5. +12
    21 October 2015 09: 17
    Translated into Russian: the sky of Syria for aviation flights of the so-called. "coalition-60" WILL NOT be closed.
    That is - we recognize the right of aviation of these jackals to be in the sky of the SOVEREIGN country of Syria ?!
    My sofa will be rather small; far from everything is visible from him and understandable, but ...
    It’s strange. Illogical.
    1. +1
      21 October 2015 09: 24
      Quote: Oman 47
      ... the sky of Syria for the so-called aviation flights. "coalition-60" Closed WILL NOT.

      What can only be sincerely regretted. It’s better to be closed, it would be calmer.
    2. +3
      21 October 2015 09: 28
      that's why they signed a memorandum so that they could not afford anything extra.
      squeezing them by force is a war, and a serious war. as well as they were legally tied to how they behave and what they can and cannot do.
      therefore, in the State Department, this memorandum is not welcome.
      1. 0
        21 October 2015 19: 17
        Quote: just explo
        that's why they signed a memorandum so that they could not afford anything extra.
        squeezing them by force is a war, and a serious war. as well as they were legally tied to how they behave and what they can and cannot do.
        therefore, in the State Department, this memorandum is not welcome.

        I agree to all 100. Yes, they illegally fly in the sky of Syria, but it is not our responsibility to transport them from there, but we can do this to limit their permissiveness and ensure flight safety, which we did soldier
    3. 0
      21 October 2015 09: 48
      I also don’t understand ... the next deflection of the cat - Leopold?
      Close to hell the whole sky!
    4. +2
      21 October 2015 10: 28
      Quote: Oman 47
      That is - we recognize the right of aviation of these jackals to be in the sky of the SOVEREIGN country of Syria ?! My sofa will be rather small; not everything is visible from him and it’s clear, but ... Strange. Illogical.

      What makes you think that we recognize the right of mattresses to the sky of Syria?
      The sky of Libya and Iraq is the patrimony of the mattress coalition, and in Syria they have nothing to do, since only the Russian aerospace forces are there legally, which we all made clear to all parties to the conflict.
      There are simply border areas where aircraft can make contact. This topic was settled.
      But the question of providing mutual assistance in conducting activities to search for and evacuate downed pilot mattresses has not yet been supported.
      We only agreed on a communication channel for this case. Obviously, they do not assume the loss of coalition air force aircraft, preparing this fate exclusively for Russian aircraft - but in vain.
      Air defense means, which will probably be transferred by the Saudis of the "moderate opposition", will equally hit all airplanes and helicopters, for frightened bearded ones do not matter - just to yell Alla louder at the bar.
      1. +1
        21 October 2015 12: 27
        Quote: Nyrobsky
        What makes you think that we recognize the right of mattresses to the sky of Syria?

        by signing the memorandum recognized. It’s necessary not only to read agitation ... wink
    5. -2
      21 October 2015 12: 25
      Quote: Oman 47
      It’s strange. Illogical.

      the usual behavior of the guarantor of the constitution is to splurge, to pretend that everything is a bundle in the hope that no one will understand what is actually happening. In this situation, they first declared that the fleet’s air defense would not allow anyone outside of Syria to fly, and then they allowed the amers to sign a memorandum, shouting to the whole country that this was another BB victory, although it doesn’t smell like victory.
    6. +1
      21 October 2015 12: 55
      looking at the dissatisfaction of the State Department, most likely the memorandum was signed on OUR terms. I think we "asked" our partners about something, like "DON'T GET IN - KILL!" From which it follows - well, so be it - for now, fly where we don't need it yet, that's all! feel Yes, and our pilots only recently warned - you never know what! nakarkali - "immoderate" fired at the American plane, the pilot threw everything that was possible, just to be saved! and today a document has been signed and on cooperation in rescue if someone is shot down ... God forbid MANPADS from the "partners" will begin to arrive en masse, they will again hit the coalition aviation - kar-kar winked
  6. +1
    21 October 2015 09: 18
    "In the event of a downed pilot or plane," they still do not rule out the situation of a military clash between American and Russian aircraft in the skies over Syria.
  7. +1
    21 October 2015 09: 19
    Cook: "... I don't know what the reasons are ..."
    That is, you were ready to hand over the text of the memorandum to your bearded embryos right now, putting one copy in a box with "Stinger" ?!
  8. +4
    21 October 2015 09: 20
    In the photo, the form of clothing is somehow alien to the look at a cursory glance, the American resembles.
    1. +3
      21 October 2015 09: 49
      Quote: nemec55
      In the photo, the form of clothing is somehow alien to the look at a cursory glance, the American resembles.


      "Alien, ours is not ours", this is a matter of habit, so to speak "for an amateur." But the question about the epaulettes of the "four-star general" (general of the army), which has already been raised in the comments, has not received an explanation or an answer.
      The fact is that since 2013 of the year, according to the Decree of the President of Russia, the everyday shoulder straps of the army general of the Russian Federation are:
      1. The comment was deleted.
    2. 0
      21 October 2015 11: 02
      [quote = nemec55] In the photo, the form of clothing is somehow foreign to the look at a cursory glance, the American resembles [/ quote

      Or maybe you should take a closer look - what if this American reminds ours?
      Yes, and the helmets are similar - maybe we’ll return to the old ones again, otherwise the fact that they don’t hold a bullet doesn’t matter, the main thing is familiar ... again, berets - and not only the USA - all armies wear them ... Disorder ... Well, about bulletproof vests and there is nothing to say - they have sunk, almost the same as those of the Americans ...
    3. 0
      21 October 2015 11: 02
      [quote = nemec55] In the photo, the form of clothing is somehow foreign to the look at a cursory glance, the American resembles [/ quote

      Or maybe you should take a closer look - what if this American reminds ours?
      Yes, and the helmets are similar - maybe we’ll go back to the old ones, and the fact that they didn’t keep the bullet and were uncomfortable, it doesn’t matter, the usual thing ... again, berets - and not only the United States - all the armies wear ... Mess ... Well, there’s nothing to say about body armor; they’ve come, almost the same as the Americans ...
      Thank God that there is less inertia in the MO and more common sense and concern for the soldier ...
      As the poet correctly noted: "Everything that is suitable for parades, not everything is suitable for a war .." Yes, I myself was convinced of this from personal experience, performing in my so-called. international debt ...
  9. +6
    21 October 2015 09: 21
    Interestingly, a memorandum on flights over Syria, and Syria was asked?
  10. +5
    21 October 2015 09: 22
    "If we see that Germany is winning, then we must help Russia. And if Russia wins, we must help Germany. And let them kill each other in this way as much as possible. All this is for the good of America" ​​(Harry Truman. New York Times June 24, 1941) - As you can see, nothing has changed in US policy since the last century, even taking into account the fact that there is no USSR.
    1. 0
      22 October 2015 05: 19
      And what can change in the politics of America?
      "He took every dollar in someone else's pocket as a personal insult."
      (O.Henry .)
  11. +5
    21 October 2015 09: 24
    And what the hell are US planes generally located in Syrian airspace? On the legal side, how is this justified? Invasion?
  12. +2
    21 October 2015 09: 33
    Quote: kod3001
    This is great news! What else could please us as safety for our pilots.


    With these, you still need to talk about the safety of pilots, this is not a joke. If (God forbid, it doesn’t matter, American or ours, what’s going to happen), it’s better to pull the guys out together. He who is closer is forward. The score sometimes goes for seconds.
  13. win
    +4
    21 October 2015 09: 39
    And what the hell are US planes generally located in Syrian airspace?

    And what the hell out of American pilots over the territory of Syria to negotiate with Russian pilots on English language? Are they so stupid (as Zadornov said) that they cannot learn a few dozen expressions and words in Russian language?
  14. 0
    21 October 2015 09: 39
    Question. How many deputy ministers do Shoigu have? With all due respect .. Military secret?
  15. +1
    21 October 2015 09: 42
    there is no military solution to the civil war in Syria, ”Kirby said.

    Finally it came! "Ignition" is later, the brain is not warmed up, the spark of consciousness is weak ...
    1. +1
      21 October 2015 09: 46
      So they are rear-wheel drive, the wrong approach smile
  16. +1
    21 October 2015 09: 59
    another diplomatic step, in principle, we achieved this, as a result, achieved ...
  17. +3
    21 October 2015 10: 12
    The memorandum matters as yet another political victory of Russia over the USA! And no matter how and who says: Forced, Achieved, Forced. The fact is that those who insisted on sanctions, on the guilt of Russia With the plane of Malaysia, In the problems of Ukraine ...... Signed what Russia said!
    soldier
    Well, about the memorandum .... there is nothing said about missiles! They can fly at any distance from US planes! There are no pilots there!
    hi
    1. +1
      21 October 2015 10: 37
      A plus. I agree with you. Of course, it would be better that they get the hell out of not only Syria, but also BV. And no Memorials are needed. Without their active "participation", terrorism will be dealt with faster and more efficiently. The country "Parasite" with its politics and "democracy" has already bothered many. In particular, Syria, where no one invited them, and America itself neither the Syrian government nor the Security Council did not ask permission.
    2. 0
      21 October 2015 10: 52
      Quote: Ruswolf
      They can fly any distance from US aircraft

      The states have already protested - our missiles from the Caspian passed several kilometers from their aircraft.
  18. 0
    21 October 2015 10: 44
    "The United States wants the military support of the Assad regime to cease," he explained.


    In Russia, they want military support for IS and the so-called. "Syrian opposition" from the US has stopped!
    Mirror response
  19. +1
    21 October 2015 10: 56
    Such documents must be signed. They can decide a lot over time.
  20. 0
    21 October 2015 11: 47
    And yet we forced him to sign.
  21. 0
    21 October 2015 12: 58
    What right do the air forces of other countries have to fly in the sky of a sovereign state? What contracts with mattresses can be?
  22. 0
    21 October 2015 16: 49
    Quote: V.ic
    there is no military solution to the civil war in Syria, ”Kirby said.

    Finally it came! "Ignition" is later, the brain is not warmed up, the spark of consciousness is weak ...


    Kirby, Kirby ... Kirbi, sorry, Lord.
  23. 0
    21 October 2015 19: 34
    US and Russia "shared" the sky over Syria