US continues to fear Baghdad with “consequences” of cooperation with Moscow

56
American officials from the Obama administration continued to exert pressure on the Iraqi authorities. A few days ago it was announced that Iraq should be grateful for the help to Washington, and it “for some reason” is on the path of rapprochement with Moscow. Now the American tantrum continued. Representatives of the Pentagon joined the case.

US continues to fear Baghdad with “consequences” of cooperation with Moscow


The head of the Committee of the Chiefs of Staff of the US Armed Forces, Joseph Dunford, stated that "the United States will not be able to provide Iraq with the necessary assistance if there are Russian military personnel on the territory of the country." These words Dunford expressed during his unannounced visit to Baghdad. Dunford said that Iraq only in military assistance with the United States can conduct effective efforts to eliminate the militants of the so-called "Islamic State."

It’s strange why Mr. Dunford didn’t say anything about why, with such large-scale coalition assistance led by the USA, Iraq, the number of militants in this long-suffering state continued to grow for a long time, as did the territories controlled by ISIL continue to expand? ..

Following a meeting with Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi, an American military official said that al-Abadi allegedly assured him of his desire to continue to rely on the United States in countering the so-called Islamic State. US media quotes Dunford:

The prime minister assured me that his country was not looking and was not seeking military support from Russia.
  • http://www.globallookpress.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

56 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    21 October 2015 07: 07
    Next to the Russians, they are not afraid of anything.
    1. +23
      21 October 2015 07: 20
      Morning positive:
      1. +3
        21 October 2015 07: 39

        It is strange why Mr. Dunford did not say anything about why, with such massive assistance from the US-led coalition the number of militants in this long-suffering state continued to grow for a long time, how did ISIS-controlled territories continue to expand? ..
        Do you know why, because the Iraqis did little to help American peacekeepers fight ISIS terrorists! After all, the United States is climbing over so that there is an American order throughout the world! And for some reason nobody helps them with this!
        1. +4
          21 October 2015 07: 48
          Quote: Dembel 77
          Do you know why, because the Iraqis did little to help American peacekeepers fight ISIS terrorists! After all, the United States is climbing over so that there is an American order throughout the world! And for some reason nobody helps them with this!

          Foreign policy of the Obama administration has led to the fact that a number of states in the Middle East will soon have nuclear weapons, and this is a disaster, writes political analyst James Lewis in the American Thinker.
          1. +12
            21 October 2015 08: 10
            I read the title of the article strangely and the question arose of itself - WHAT CAN BE HOPELESS AND SCARY COOPERATION WITH WASHINGTON? ..
            1. +3
              21 October 2015 09: 01
              Quote: Now we are free
              I read the title of the article strangely and the question arose of itself - WHAT CAN BE HOPELESS AND SCARY COOPERATION WITH WASHINGTON? ..


              The answer is obvious, and what they say "lies on the surface": Cooperation with the Kiev junta, in
              any questions ...
            2. 0
              21 October 2015 11: 40
              Not only Iraq is feeling American pressure. Americans are beginning to enrage the attempts of governments of any country to cooperate with Russia.
              It is precisely with this that the United States shows its face, by any means, to oppose our country and impose its "crap democracy" on us.
            3. 0
              21 October 2015 13: 16
              Quote: Now we are free
              I read the title of the article strangely and the question arose of itself - WHAT CAN BE HOPELESS AND SCARY COOPERATION WITH WASHINGTON? ..

              Well, here you are not quite right. Your statement is true if you identify the government and the country. But this situation is completely different! Americans are completely logical in their demands. They say something like this:
              We gave you (the Iraqi government) this chance. Under Saddam, you twisted the tails of the donkeys, and now you have become power. For this, you must fulfill our demands, whether they benefit "your" country or not, not your sadness! The country is not yours, it is ours (American), we captured it with your help, and you are simply allowed to rob and steal in this territory, and puff out your cheeks. All.
              If you are stubborn, we will first "stop helping", that is, we will stop transferring the money that you saw with our banks. Yes, you, bastard Iraqis, get good from this money if 2%. So what, it's still a freebie! Let's select. Etc.
          2. The comment was deleted.
      2. +2
        21 October 2015 08: 14
        Thanks for the positive, laughed heartily :)
    2. +19
      21 October 2015 07: 25
      Quote: avvg
      Next to the Russians, they are not afraid of anything.

      And they have someone to compare, Iraq has been suffocating for almost 13 years from such mattress help, and here Russians come to Syria and begin to wet the barmalei where they find it.
      1. +4
        21 October 2015 07: 46
        The Iraques came up with their democrats to the fullest, immediately after the overthrow of Saddam, and we would have been ironing there for at least a week at the request of the Iraqi authorities.
    3. +30
      21 October 2015 08: 15
      Some historical parallels and associations should make you think ...
      1. +3
        21 October 2015 09: 06
        So they are stupid - Turkey Day, Groundhog Day, Halloween! And the words of the national anthem strike with hostility and bloodthirstiness!
      2. +7
        21 October 2015 09: 39
        Yugoslavs saved Albright from the Nazis. How she thanked them all is known.
    4. +1
      21 October 2015 09: 43
      There will be no worse situation in Iraq after the Americans ... there is simply nowhere worse ...
    5. +3
      21 October 2015 10: 05
      understand "overseas partners" if the Russians come to Iraq, then the doors for the Western crap will be closed ...

      "... Dunford stated that Iraq only in military assistance with the USA can carry out effective activities to eliminate the militants of the so-called "Islamic State" ... " - that's for sure wassat noble fighters against terrorists
    6. 0
      21 October 2015 11: 55
      And how Saddam is happy that the Americans came to Iraq.
    7. 0
      21 October 2015 14: 00
      Well Yes !! Well Yes!. A few days ago a bill was sent to the Parliament on Iraq’s appeal to help in the fight against ISIS. US rabies is not imaginable. Russia in the person of the President has clearly stated to the world community. Only legally and in compliance with International Law. Russia destroys the rules that existed before. And this implies a very interesting aspect. What situation might the Yankees face in Iraq. The fact that the pressure is very strong on the United States by the Iraqi authorities doesn’t go to Mom. Let’s see. Yes, Russia really hit the United States at the UN Assembly. Everything is only by law. While the United States is conducting fierce propaganda against our country, But they did not find a solution to this unexpected problem. Not all countries have realized that it took time. But the unipolar world has been hit hard diplomatically. The near future will be shown by the decision of Iraq. And not only this country there are many of them and they will carefully monitor and compare these different positions in International Law.
  2. +19
    21 October 2015 07: 09
    So much further to frighten ...
    two decades, as poverty reigns and devastation and all with the advent of American democracy ...
    1. +6
      21 October 2015 07: 17
      the situation in Iraq is critical, the local authorities are not able to withstand IS, therefore, they don’t care who the result would be. And the United States, as usual, crawls up and leaves it to the local
      1. +1
        21 October 2015 08: 33
        I think that it is LESS CRITICAL than it was before September 30 :)
  3. +16
    21 October 2015 07: 10
    So, the guys in Syria have gotten rid of themselves, now they have set about Iraq ?! Judging by the rhetoric, they now do not stutter about Syria ?!
    1. +3
      21 October 2015 07: 17
      Quote: Decathlon
      So, the guys in Syria have gotten rid of themselves, now they have set about Iraq ?! Judging by the rhetoric, they now do not stutter about Syria ?!


      It's scary in Syria)))) Our VKS rise into the air, all the "cool" ones immediately sit down "in order to avoid". And this American stench will continue. Thoughts are zero, and inertia is such a thing ..... The squeak of a detrained brain is heard. It remains only to scare the one who is ready to send away in a certain direction. Clinic however.
      1. +2
        21 October 2015 08: 31
        Yes Yes...
        It's like that. Everything is confirmed when they say "they love leaders not for the beautiful eyes, but for the Strength of their state ..." :)
        When did the Americans rub in close combat?
        Have they ever climbed into the trenches with sapper blades ..?
        And the Russian girl has now bitten the ribbon cap ...
    2. 0
      21 October 2015 08: 34
      They are already alone and Crimea left, however))
  4. +9
    21 October 2015 07: 12
    Iraq should be grateful for helping Washington

    Why only Iraq? Take more - the whole world, but why there - the whole Universe.
  5. +8
    21 October 2015 07: 12
    it was announced that Iraq should be thankful for helping Washington,
    for what? for a hotbed of terrorism? for the destruction of cultural heritage? for looted artifacts? mentally, so Iraq should say "fak-yu" to Fashington in broken English ...
  6. +12
    21 October 2015 07: 13
    In the east, RESPECT is respected, not idle talk. If Assad regains his country, the Iraqis will think hard.
    1. 0
      21 October 2015 10: 32
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      If Assad regains his country
      It seems to me that if it returns, then a piece (
      In case of victory (which is in itself doubtful) Assad will be doomed to compromises and reforms. One God (any) knows what they will be.
  7. +5
    21 October 2015 07: 15
    The US will not be able to provide Iraq with the necessary assistance if Russian troops are in the country

    Help to destroy the country and people of Iraq? No, "we don't need such a photoball," and "we can do without the lousy ones."
  8. +6
    21 October 2015 07: 16
    If you are afraid, then we do everything right!
  9. ICT
    +3
    21 October 2015 07: 19
    Quote: Andrey Yurievich
    Fashington "fak-yu" in broken English ...



    http://bocharik.livejournal.com/605786.html
    1. +1
      21 October 2015 08: 13
      Quote: TIT
      http://bocharik.livejournal.com/605786.html

      Thanks, laughed lol
    2. +1
      21 October 2015 09: 04
      ICT

      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      Thanks, laughed


      from me, too, merci) Bocharik steers.
  10. +3
    21 October 2015 07: 19
    A logical step on the part of the United States, how to harm? Correctly destroy or harm our coalition, now they will connect the mongrel, start negotiations with "interested" countries
  11. +3
    21 October 2015 07: 20
    And about Iraqi oil they are silent, afraid to get their heads up?
  12. +5
    21 October 2015 07: 22
    Habitual policy of the ovsky military. However, like their Foreign Ministry. How much they differ from the policy line pursued by the Russian Foreign Ministry! The states behave like a plowman in the zone, like invaders in an occupied country, which, however, is actually the case. In general, I can’t recall at least some military operation of the US military carried out wisely until its logical conclusion.
  13. +6
    21 October 2015 07: 27
    Gaddafi and Hussein learned amer's "democracy" in full.
  14. +5
    21 October 2015 07: 38
    After the killing of a million Iraqi civilians in 2003; after the destruction of the state and the transfer of its territory to the ISIS, Baghdad, of course, should be very scared. laughing

    Americans, Americans ... if only other countries were frightened, which were not bombed. Wherever the United States comes, there remains a democratic desert flooded with warring gangs. God forbid Iraq from such "help"!
  15. +2
    21 October 2015 08: 00
    Hmm ... they want to prohibit the passage of aircraft, as I understand it.
    And another interesting point - for what kind of help should Iraq be grateful to the staff?
  16. +2
    21 October 2015 08: 02
    It is strange that the Americans are not making attempts to bring democracy, say, to the Mexicans, but everyone is climbing to hell. And far away, democracy is not always offered, but only selectively.
  17. +1
    21 October 2015 08: 05
    Cross and breathe a sigh of relief that this help will not be for the Iraqis, the consequence of the striped help we all know. negative
  18. +2
    21 October 2015 08: 11
    A few days ago it was announced that Iraq should be grateful for helping Washington,
    The height of cynicism. The United States by its actions destroyed, no, directly "rolled into molecular dust" the statehood of Iraq, calmly looked at how several states were formed on this territory, one of them is Islamic and now they also demand to say THANK YOU for this
  19. +6
    21 October 2015 08: 11
    US continues to fear Baghdad with “consequences” of cooperation with Moscow


    "These Russians will bring you bears with balalaikas, they will make you drink vodka!"
    1. 0
      21 October 2015 09: 46
      Quote: Mowgli
      "These Russians will bring you bears with balalaikas, they will make you drink vodka!"

      This is still nothing, that's when the wars of the IG, after our "air lectures", will start eating FAT, this will be the highest class
  20. +1
    21 October 2015 08: 16
    I’m wondering, do the Americans themselves believe their ridiculous statements, or are they just kidding ?;)
  21. +1
    21 October 2015 08: 19
    Quote: ZU-23
    The Iraques came up with their democrats to the fullest, immediately after the overthrow of Saddam, and we would have been ironing there for at least a week at the request of the Iraqi authorities.


    Look at this face, the main thing in it is the form, the American parade. Well, a cap, it goes without saying. What are they taking there? That Kirby was slightly rumpled here, Nuland, it seems, does not sleep at all (does not dry out, in the sense), they have only sober frames with a Michelle, seem. Well, maybe the Terminator. So send this mechanism, our hackers will reprogram, they will give the lieutenant. And to the service.
  22. +1
    21 October 2015 08: 26
    This is purely American style - open pressure on a sovereign country (while under the Americans, but sometimes has its own opinion) and the demand to fulfill what is prescribed by the United States. Then they are surprised - they started to love us (Americans) less, and they started to mention Russia more. "What goes around comes around". I would not be surprised if at one fine time the Anglo-Saxons are left alone with Poland, the Baltic states and of course Ukraine. Here a fun life will begin.
  23. 0
    21 October 2015 08: 31
    Chatterboxes you are from the Pentagon. Your help is chiri in the ass. It seems you can’t see, but sitting on a chair is not comfortable. Where you provide assistance, devastation and garbage.
  24. +3
    21 October 2015 08: 32
    American dirty politics is dangerous to the world and testifies to the ill health of American society.
  25. +2
    21 October 2015 08: 46
    Washington began to intimidate and put pressure on the Iraqis. Direct interference in the affairs of another state. The Americans are "experiencing" .... How would they not be expelled from this region at all!
  26. +5
    21 October 2015 08: 54
    And what remains for them, the situation escapes from their control. If they did, at least they controlled something. And the Iraqi leaders just want to live. In general, the situation from the point of view of history has formed an interesting one. Concentration of the interests of different forces in one region. But then I came forester (read Putin), and heaped on everyone. And Russia behaves correctly, everything is only within the framework of the law, without betraying anyone like an ice rink from the hill, it is inevitable. I hope our authorities discussed in advance, with Assad, what we get after the victory. For example, military bases for life. Contracts for our companies, sales market. It may be enough to help everyone for free.
  27. 0
    21 October 2015 08: 56
    Your horror stories work against you, gentlemen "exceptional".
  28. +1
    21 October 2015 08: 56
    US continues to fear Baghdad with “consequences” of cooperation with Moscow

    The meaning is approximately the following.
    Iraqis, if you continue to cooperate with Moscow, then you run the risk of establishing your life again. In your cities they will stop shooting, your inhabitants will stop dying from shelling. And you run the risk of your economy starting to recover.
    And then we are nothing, you hear, nothing we can not help you. )))
  29. +1
    21 October 2015 09: 11
    And why should Iraq be grateful to America? For hundreds of thousands of killed citizens, for a destroyed economy, for burnt cities and villages, for a hanged president, for ISIS ????
    For such a variant of the American "democracy" adapted for Iraq?
  30. 0
    21 October 2015 09: 35
    Together with the smelly Yankees, Iraq will be able to effectively ... destroy its country.
  31. 0
    21 October 2015 09: 41
    Do not ask so do not ask. It will be where the Igilov scum from Syria to escape. I really don’t think Iraq will like it.
  32. 0
    21 October 2015 09: 48
    Honestly, I didn’t really want to help Iraq. Too much honor for the state more than once turning its back on Russia.
    1. 0
      21 October 2015 10: 20
      Mama_Cholli
      Honestly, I didn’t really want to help Iraq. Too much honor for the state more than once turning its back on Russia.

      hi
      I agree. That as the state does not want to help ..... But as a people. Who does not always think how the authorities think it is necessary to help. America does not give bribes to the people. She helps him to rob him for a paid service in the form of a "roof"!
      Yes, and they must be driven from the Middle East! Too small territory for two political hegemons (Russia and the USA).
  33. 0
    21 October 2015 12: 49
    They can only fear Moscow. Impotents themselves. Only seduce and quit. Nothing really works out.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"