The anti-aircraft regiment in Kamchatka will be reinforced with the Pantsir-С1 complexes.

The Ministry of Defense made a decision to put in the Kamchatka anti-aircraft missile regiment in addition to the C-400 ZRS missile systems available there, Pantsir-С1, reports RIA News a message from the representative of the Eastern District Roman Martov.




“The Pantsir-С1” anti-aircraft missile-cannon systems will be commissioned by the Kamchatka anti-aircraft missile regiment in the near future. The new complexes will carry combat duty in conjunction with the C-400 Triumph divisions. Now the sky in the north-east of Russia will be secured by a mixed group of long-range and short-range air defense weapons ",
said Martov.

The anti-aircraft regiment in Kamchatka will be reinforced with the Pantsir-С1 complexes.
Photos used:
RIA News. Mikhail Mokrushin
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. GSH-18 20 October 2015 17: 55 New
    • 12
    • 0
    +12
    The anti-aircraft regiment in Kamchatka will be reinforced with the Pantsir-С1 complexes.

    5 points! Excellent air defense system. At our Olympiad, they covered such a city. With my own eyes I saw when we curled up and left at the end. good
    1. 740
      740 20 October 2015 18: 08 New
      • -41
      • 0
      -41
      Quote: GSH-18
      With my own eyes I saw when we curled up and left at the end

      Yesterday, in a city where there was an unnecessary Olympics, one such car turned upside down.
      1. GSH-18 20 October 2015 18: 21 New
        • 10
        • 0
        +10
        Quote: 740
        Quote: GSH-18
        With my own eyes I saw when we curled up and left at the end

        Yesterday, in a city where there was an unnecessary Olympics, one such car turned upside down.

        And who are you to decide for the 700 thousand population of Sochi ?? Are you smarter than everyone? Or do you have the right veta? The city unanimously voted for the Olympics. And now, at least, no one regrets it. Well, people like you can continue to come to snot and poison. Fortunately, nothing has long been dependent on you. yes
        1. 740
          740 20 October 2015 18: 27 New
          • -14
          • 0
          -14
          Quote: GSH-18
          Quote: 740
          Quote: GSH-18
          With my own eyes I saw when we curled up and left at the end

          Yesterday, in a city where there was an unnecessary Olympics, one such car turned upside down.

          And who are you to decide for the 700 thousand population of Sochi ?? Are you smarter than everyone? Or do you have the right veta? The city unanimously voted for the Olympics. And now, at least, no one regrets it. Well, people like you can continue to come to snot and poison. Fortunately, nothing has long been dependent on you. yes

          And you broke up. Of course, it’s nice to feel sorry for you. You’ve got some dofig lavender in you. Of course you’ve risen to games. I remember when Crimea was annexed, and after a month there was a direct line with Putin. Sochi residents crawled out and let's load the security officer with questions about how we would now raise the loot at the spa, when such a competitor appeared.
          1. GSH-18 20 October 2015 18: 52 New
            • 9
            • 0
            +9
            Quote: 740
            I remember when Crimea was annexed, and after a month there was a direct line with Putin. Sochi residents crawled out and let's load the security officer with questions about how we would raise the loot when such a competitor appeared

            Amigo The question was only about the comparability of the amount of resort advertising in the media, and only that. Crimea now is not a competitor to us at all, they are still five years old from the ruin to get up, and there is no bridge yet. Yes, and do not mind us, the people in our country are enough, enough for all resorts. And then, do not call the People’s President of the Russian Federation "Chekist." He is not a chikist, but a national leader. Feel the difference.
            1. 740
              740 20 October 2015 19: 01 New
              • -2
              • 0
              -2
              Quote: GSH-18
              And then, do not call the People’s President of the Russian Federation "Chekist." He is not a chikist, but a national leader.

              wink
              1. anti-Semite 20 October 2015 21: 45 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Valera, what's wrong with the KGB? as for me the guys from the NKVD Cheka and the KGB are heroes when liberoids for manure come out, but as for me, serving the KGB to the president is only a plus
                1. 740
                  740 20 October 2015 22: 22 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: anti-Semite
                  Valera, what's wrong with the KGB?

                  Andreich, I already said that there is nothing terrible.
                  1. anti-Semite 20 October 2015 22: 27 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    it just sounds somehow accusatory to you
                    1. 740
                      740 21 October 2015 00: 09 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      Quote: anti-Semite
                      it just sounds somehow accusatory to you

                      Yes, stop it, it sounds normal, it suits me and there is no need to cheat.
            2. The comment was deleted.
        2. gispanec 20 October 2015 19: 15 New
          • 7
          • 0
          +7
          Quote: 740
          Yesterday, in a city where there was an unnecessary Olympics, one such car turned upside down.

          escaped a collision with a passenger car that flew into the oncoming line ..... this time ..... put on wheels and SAMA went on ... these are two ....
          and three is for YOU the Olympics are not needed .... you don’t need anything at all ... but we really need the citizens
          1. 740
            740 20 October 2015 19: 22 New
            • -10
            • 0
            -10
            Quote: gispanec
            put on wheels and SAMA went on ... it's two ....

            Well and then what. Put on wheels and well, that went.
            Quote: gispanec
            and three is for YOU the Olympics are not needed .... you don’t need anything at all ... but we really need the citizens

            Where do you live, citizen, and how will Sochi, which is built up with sports facilities, affect your life?
          2. With Siberian Cranes 20 October 2015 20: 43 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            I am a citizen of the Russian Federation. I do not need this olympiad as well as the World Cup in football. This money would be better spent on mass sports. A healthy nation is more important than a place in the team event.
            1. 740
              740 20 October 2015 21: 09 New
              • -4
              • 0
              -4
              Quote: With Cranes
              I am a citizen of the Russian Federation. I do not need this olympiad as well as the World Cup in football. This money would be better spent on mass sports. A healthy nation is more important than a place in the team event.

              The World Cup, of course, is a good thing. It’s as if there’s nothing to allocate except for sports entertainment. By the way, I came across a guy’s post on the network. He calculated that the 2014 event could be replaced by construction, several large fitness centers in each region of the Russian Federation, and there would be enough money more than that. Here I understand the concern for the health of the nation.
            2. cuzmin.mihail2013 21 October 2015 01: 05 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Are you sure that the money would go to mass sport, and not the health of some individual representatives of the nation?
              1. 740
                740 21 October 2015 11: 52 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Quote: cuzmin.mihail2013
                Are you sure that the money would go to mass sport, and not the health of some individual representatives of the nation?

                I am sure that mass sport would normally get the money, of course, not without a cut from officials.
      2. Smilodon79 20 October 2015 18: 55 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        You along troll Hohlyatsky, Vali from here. He didn’t like the Olympics, he’s not living in the president, why do you live in Russia? Run live in Kiev.
        1. 740
          740 20 October 2015 19: 07 New
          • -4
          • 0
          -4
          Quote: Smilodon79
          You along troll Hohlyatsky, Vali from here. He didn’t like the Olympics, he’s not living in the president, why do you live in Russia? Run live in Kiev.

          Himself go there. If I didn’t like that the state stupidly poured money, don’t understand what, it doesn’t mean that I’m a troll. Did you understand, smart guy?
          1. With Siberian Cranes 20 October 2015 20: 45 New
            • -4
            • 0
            -4
            You can’t prove it to him. He will say about Peskov’s watches that they’re just commander’s, and the liberals who are damned are all lying.
            1. anti-Semite 20 October 2015 21: 52 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              damned liberals for 10 years of rule stole so much they ruined and ruined that they generally have no moral right to judge or criticize anyone, without regarding my opinion about current officials
      3. Bkmz 20 October 2015 22: 47 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        And what, in the world there are a lot of cars and military equipment that turns over, and nothing, so no need to whine, anything happens. It’s not up to you whether the Olympics are necessary or not, Russia now has a world-class ski resort, there are stadiums and there is a Formula 1 circuit. I think this is a plus.
        1. 740
          740 21 October 2015 00: 03 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Bkmz
          It’s not up to you whether the Olympics are necessary or not, Russia now has a world-class ski resort, there are stadiums and there is a Formula 1 circuit. I think this is a plus.

          You can count anything, just like me.
          A world-class ski resort with a horse price tag. Come to us in Krasnoyarsk, of course, everything will be more modest, but people can not go skiing in a jamb, the infrastructure is very decent.
          Stadiums that are empty. FISHT — does he have a basic football team? No. And there will not be full houses there. It will stand idle until the age of 18, and then foggy prospects. Many of our athletes train over the hill, it’s not known how fucking Russian sports federations are dispose of the legacy of OI, that’s the problem.
          F1 track, well, maybe something good will come of it. But also, a race once a year.
  2. cerbuk6155 20 October 2015 17: 57 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    They must be delivered immediately in the complex. good good soldier
  3. theadenter 20 October 2015 17: 59 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Shell-C1 and S-400 Triumph - a powerful couple. good
    1. kil 31 20 October 2015 18: 03 New
      • -7
      • 0
      -7
      I have a question for the natives of the peninsula. Do you have there that the ground is good and the weather if air defense systems are delivered to you on a wheelbase?
      1. theadenter 20 October 2015 18: 26 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Well, so far there is no S-400 on the tracks. What now, do not put there at all air defense, chtoli? Or put less perfect on TTX S-300?
        There are roads there. And the technology will not be stored outdoors, in such a climate.
      2. Alexey RA 20 October 2015 18: 43 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Quote: Kil 31
        I have a question for the natives of the peninsula. Do you have there that the ground is good and the weather if air defense systems are delivered to you on a wheelbase?

        And air defense of the airborne forces has no other base.
        The caterpillar base is complexes for the army (letter "B *"). "A competing firm." smile
        1. kil 31 20 October 2015 19: 02 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Alexey RA
          Quote: Kil 31
          I have a question for the natives of the peninsula. Do you have there that the ground is good and the weather if air defense systems are delivered to you on a wheelbase?

          And air defense of the airborne forces has no other base.
          The caterpillar base is complexes for the army (letter "B *"). "A competing firm." smile

          I don’t see any problems while the videoconferencing is developing a harp to buy from a competitor for such regions. Everyone is doing one thing protecting the sky of the motherland. Instead of "Shell" you can put the TOP. On television forever in the news from late autumn to late spring, came a cyclone stood up cars and airports. People dig cars out of the snow. hi
      3. Monkeyman 20 October 2015 19: 30 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Normal soils there, served in this regiment DMB2001. Yes it is a lot of snow, it sweeps up on the second floor.
        1. Russ_Dry 21 October 2015 00: 33 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          the ground is normal, the average one can say =)
          and yes, we have a lot of snow. happens half a meter or more at a time.
        2. The comment was deleted.
      4. Bongo 21 October 2015 12: 26 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Kil 31
        I have a question for the natives of the peninsula. Do you have there that the ground is good and the weather if air defense systems are delivered to you on a wheelbase?

        The S-300PS that covered the nuclear submarine base in Vilyuchinsk were also on wheels. And nothing 30 years have been successfully exploited there. In the picture is the position of S-300PS air defense missile systems on the shore of Avacha Bay.
  4. venaya 20 October 2015 18: 00 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    the security of the sky in the north-east of Russia will be ensured by a mixed group of long-range and short-range air defense weapons

    Weapon systems of the same type are insufficient, systems with different ranges of target destruction in range are needed. I think that it is a serious and necessary help for a comprehensive solution to the task of protecting the coast.
  5. Armored optimist 20 October 2015 18: 04 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: cerbuk6155
    They must be delivered immediately in the complex. good good soldier

    And be sure to think about ground cover. When I served, any complex could easily be disabled by a pair of saboteurs.
  6. Alexander 3 20 October 2015 18: 05 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    A good set of characteristics, even a projectile from a gun will be knocked down.
  7. lesnik. 20 October 2015 18: 12 New
    • -10
    • 0
    -10
    Sadly, the “Shell-C1”, today, in terms of combat performance, is 0 in relation to the “Tor-M2KM”.
    1. theadenter 20 October 2015 18: 33 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      In terms of what?
      Are the tasks different for these complexes?
      1. gispanec 20 October 2015 19: 21 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Quote: lesnik.
        Sadly, the “Shell-C1”, today, in terms of combat performance, is 0 in relation to the “Tor-M2KM”.

        Well, you’ve got ... horse-men mixed in a bunch ..... torus etozh military air defense ... cover on the march of armored vehicles ... and the shell is the air defense of strategic objects .... which is s400 ..... Sochi14 was a strategist and they were put there .....
  8. lesnik. 20 October 2015 18: 38 New
    • -3
    • 0
    -3
    Quote: theadenter
    In terms of what?
    Are the tasks different for these complexes?

    In practice, in combat use - of the same type.
    1. Genry 20 October 2015 18: 50 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: lesnik.
      Sadly, the “Shell-C1”, today, in terms of combat performance, is 0 in relation to the “Tor-M2KM”

      Quote: lesnik.
      In practice, in combat use - of the same type.

      "Shell" - in fact, the defense system of air defense systems against gliding bombs, missiles, ground ...
      1. lesnik. 21 October 2015 05: 35 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Sincerely, who told you this?
    2. NDR-791 20 October 2015 18: 52 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: lesnik.
      In practice, in combat use - of the same type.

      You are not right! TOR cannot shoot at surface, and the shell is quite ... even with rubber bands, and this is cover as a second safety line. The first should be all sorts of machine. detection sensors, etc., but I doubt that we have enough of them.
  9. NDR-791 20 October 2015 18: 46 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    The anti-aircraft regiment in Kamchatka will be reinforced with the Pantsir-С1 complexes.
    Outdated infa, damn it !!! Scroll through even today's Life News, but they do not suffer from responsiveness. There, not only C-400, but also TORAS and Carapace NEW, FRESH. So, the TORs and the Carapace, judging by the interview with the military, calculated there were staged two more years ago! In general, it was high time to cover the periphery and it’s right that they finally covered.
    1. Captain45 20 October 2015 20: 39 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: NDR-791
      The anti-aircraft regiment in Kamchatka will be reinforced with the Pantsir-С1 complexes.
      Outdated infa, damn it !!! Scroll through even today's Life News, but they do not suffer from responsiveness. There, not only C-400, but also TORAS and Carapace NEW, FRESH.

      I agree, it’s outdated, today in the news on the Zvezda shopping center they showed the Kuril Islands, they said they put the TOR on duty and showed the complex. The truth did not say which of the islands, but it doesn’t hurt. The main thing is.
  10. Parsec 20 October 2015 18: 51 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: lesnik.
    Sadly, the “Shell-C1”, today, in terms of combat performance, is 0 in relation to the “Tor-M2KM”.


    And disclose the content of the term "combat performance".
    1. lesnik. 21 October 2015 05: 28 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      If you are not familiar with this term, I will not argue.
  11. Megatron 20 October 2015 19: 19 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And why not to place us in the Kuril Islands .... Iskander ???
  12. slaw14 20 October 2015 20: 19 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The first Armor was on a tracked platform, but the Saudis (purchasers) asked to be mounted on wheels, since then we know it at the Kamaz base.
    Little known fact, but such developments as the RPG-30-32 and the Tiger armored car were paid for their own purposes by the Saudis, but they nevertheless found their niche in our army.
    1. lelikas 20 October 2015 20: 46 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: slaw14
      Little known fact

      Only everyone who at least a little bit dug the topic - they know about it;). Actually, the first displays of the Shell were a tracked version.
  13. Steppe 20 October 2015 20: 46 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Correctly. I believe that NATO will jump on Russia from all sides in the event of an attack. The east will also be attacked as the west of Russia. Not to mention the south. I do not know how the north. The president knows best.
  14. Modernwarfire 20 October 2015 20: 48 New
    • -7
    • 0
    -7
    The Ministry of Defense decided to put Pantsyr-C400 systems in addition to the S-1 air defense systems in Kamchatka’s anti-aircraft missile regiment, Roman Martov, a spokesman for the Eastern District, reports to RIA Novosti.

    PantsYr ?? and someone else dares to say something about the victims of the exam?) themselves are not funny? scoops) the most "literate" in the world) ahah)
    1. Anchonsha 20 October 2015 23: 22 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Here you are, Mr. bad, and there is a real scoop, but evil. And I think that you are a supporter of Bandera, because the handwriting of them, as well as all Ukrainians, is in contesting the facts. Like this: "... but you, the Russians," and immediately refer, for example, to the results of the exam ...
  15. BULLIT 20 October 2015 22: 21 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    They say TOR-M1 and its modifications are better!
    1. lesnik. 21 October 2015 04: 58 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      So it is, since April we have been hanging around on Ashuluk, has been shooting everything, from the needle to the s-400, we cannot train the shell in any way. One heat trap is a rocket with joy behind it.
  16. Yugra 20 October 2015 22: 33 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It is nice to know that the Shells already in Latakia cover our pilots ...
  17. Sergey333 20 October 2015 23: 04 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: BULLIT
    They say TOR-M1 and its modifications are better!

    Naturally, more recent development, new missiles.
  18. Zomanus 21 October 2015 01: 28 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    In short layered air defense system, as it should.
    Still Torah is needed or Buki, and there will be a complete set.
  19. Wolka 21 October 2015 05: 49 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Now Kamchatka is exactly our unsinkable aircraft carrier in TO ...
  20. Modernwarfire 21 October 2015 15: 50 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    Quote: Anchonsha
    Here you are, Mr. bad, and there is a real scoop, but evil. And I think that you are a supporter of Bandera, because the handwriting of them, as well as all Ukrainians, is in contesting the facts. Like this: "... but you, the Russians," and immediately refer, for example, to the results of the exam ...

    go and steal.