Belarus will acquire Russian Su-30CM after 2020

Belarusian Defense Ministry plans to purchase Su-30CM fighter jets, reports RIA News Post commander of the Air Force and the country's air defense forces Oleg Dvigalev.




“It is time to replace outdated aircraft. As an alternative, we consider the Su-30CM, ”said the general.

According to him, "new fighter aircraft should replace the aging MiG-29."

Dvigalev clarified that procurement is likely to be made after 2020.

“At the MAKS-2015 exhibition in the Moscow region, the Belarusian pilot tested the Su-30CM. He has very good reviews about this car, ”- said the commander.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. cerbuk6155 20 October 2015 17: 40 New
    • 14
    • 0
    +14
    Acquired, only at the expense of RUSSIA, they themselves will not pay. soldier
    1. vovanpain 20 October 2015 17: 44 New
      • 14
      • 0
      +14
      Quote: cerbuk6155
      Acquired, only at the expense of RUSSIA, they themselves will not pay. soldier

      No, for a base on its territory, but until 2020, a lot more can change
    2. Nevsky_ZU 20 October 2015 17: 45 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      According to him, "new fighter aircraft should replace the aging MiG-29."

      Perhaps considering the territory of Belarus and experience in the operation of the MIG-29, it is more logical to take the MIG-35, which will probably still be brought to mind by the year of 2020? what
      1. cerbuk6155 20 October 2015 17: 56 New
        • 11
        • 0
        +11
        For a blink of an hour, Lukashenko disagrees, he wants a ship and even at the expense of RUSSIA he doesn’t want a base, and he wants to see only his pilots on airplanes. Here you have an ally. soldier
        1. Saratoga833 20 October 2015 20: 13 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: cerbuk6155
          For a blink of an hour, Lukashenko disagrees, he wants a ship and even at the expense of RUSSIA he doesn’t want a base, and he wants to see only his pilots on airplanes. Here you have an ally

          No wonder! As always a tropodopit! He is our ally, but with a stone in his bosom!
        2. molva73 20 October 2015 21: 56 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          And what, in fact, do you dislike? We are allies, we will buy airplanes from Russia. Perhaps we will place the base. But even if we don’t post it, what are your complaints? At least 2 Russian military units are deployed in Belarus. I see no reason to blame Belarus for infidelity to allied obligations. By the way, we buy Russian equipment, no one gives us it.
        3. pilot8878 20 October 2015 23: 38 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: cerbuk6155
          ... Lukashenko ... wants a sou and even that at the expense of RUSSIA and does not want a base, but on planes he wants to see only his pilots. Here you have an ally. soldier

          And tell me, please, which director of the collective farm will say: "But come, neighbors, on your tractors and work our fields for your bins." Such a director will be quickly removed - why is he needed if the neighbors cope with his duties? And Grigorich is an old, seasoned director. You won’t go around such a goat on a curve. laughing
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Lt. Air Force stock 20 October 2015 18: 59 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Nevsky_ZU
        Perhaps considering the territory of Belarus and experience in the operation of the MIG-29, it is more logical to take the MIG-35, which will probably still be brought to mind by the year of 2020?

        It’s also strange, like, a year or two ago they wanted to put the Su-27 into reserve, they say heavy fighters are expensive to refuel and service, and for a small territory of Belarus a light fighter is preferable.
        1. prosto_rgb 20 October 2015 20: 06 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Lt. Air Force stock
          It’s also strange, like, a year or two ago they wanted to put the Su-27 into reserve, they say heavy fighters are expensive to refuel and service, and for a small territory of Belarus a light fighter is preferable.

          That's right, but there are a few nuances.
          - Aircraft of the Su-27 family in Russia are mass-produced, and at several factories. Delivered to many countries of the world. Accordingly, there should be no problems with operation and maintenance. A plane is not a one-time phone for $ 50.
          - Serial production of modern light class fighters in Russia is not available now. Experienced vehicles have the MiG-35 and other modifications as a development model for the MiG-29th. Now the new light class fighters are either west or China. Alas.
        2. molva73 20 October 2015 21: 59 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          A resource was released in Su-27. There is no money to buy new yet.
    3. Thronekeeper 20 October 2015 18: 08 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Belarus is not a poor country. Moreover, installment purchase.
      But the Su-30SM is a good defense of our western borders.
      And, if you call a spade a spade, it is impossible for Russia to save on customers in plans for the supply of weapons. It is not for nothing that Pe-stan does not save on this. It depends on the political factor, depending on the components.
      The main thing is to ensure the continuity of power and prevent oranzhada.
    4. War and Peace 20 October 2015 18: 42 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      and dad is trifling? take so f35, about 30 should be enough for Belarus ...
      1. Lt. Air Force stock 20 October 2015 19: 00 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: war and peace
        and dad is trifling? take so f35, about 30 should be enough for Belarus ...

        No one will sell. Why is the Su-30SM interesting, not the Su-35, Mig-35, or PakFa, which will be in the midst of production with second-stage engines after 2020.
        1. prosto_rgb 20 October 2015 20: 00 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Lt. Air Force stock
          Mig-35, or PakFa which will be after 2020 in the midst of production with engines of the second stage.

          PakFa - first of all, the Russian Air Force itself is needed.
          MiG35 - it is now not mass-produced unfortunately. Unlike Su
          1. Garris199 21 October 2015 02: 10 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: prosto_rgb
            PakFa - first of all, the Russian Air Force itself is needed.
            MiG35 - it is now not mass-produced unfortunately. Unlike Su

            It's like that. So what about the SU-35s? In my opinion, he surpasses 30ku in everything.
      2. prosto_rgb 20 October 2015 20: 10 New
        • -1
        • 0
        -1
        Quote: war and peace
        take so f35, pieces 30

        For the money you can buy 3 times more Su-30SM. And under f35 it is necessary to switch to the NATO standard in the Air Force.
        1. Oman 47 20 October 2015 23: 12 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Comrades!
          Another five-year-old bear is running, and the skin is being cut in a nine-node move ?! stop
          IS IT NOT EARNING ?!
          What are we discussing?
          Future possible intentions?
          Hints Old Man?
      3. The comment was deleted.
    5. Lt. Air Force stock 20 October 2015 18: 56 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: cerbuk6155
      Acquired, only at the expense of RUSSIA, they themselves will not pay.

      Alternatively, you can lease.
    6. Prisoner 20 October 2015 19: 53 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      And what kind of shisha? But it is necessary to give. Old Man in Europe is not breathing evenly. winked
  2. fox21h 20 October 2015 17: 40 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    A lot of water leaks during this time, they make a far cry ...
    1. figwam 20 October 2015 17: 43 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      As an alternative, we are considering the Su-30SM, ”the general said.

      Isn’t it too late? after 2020.
      1. theadenter 20 October 2015 17: 48 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        And why late, this is the same fresh modification.

        Another thing - the situation in the world can greatly change.
  3. DMoroz 20 October 2015 17: 41 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    after the break-in in Syria, they can not only be delivered to Belarus, the line will be built. And by 2020 they are already modernizing again ...
  4. Armored optimist 20 October 2015 17: 42 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The surname of the general is “aviation”.
    1. Hubun 20 October 2015 17: 45 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      but it seems to me with that last name he would have to work in drug control
  5. theadenter 20 October 2015 17: 44 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    MiG-29 is a beautiful plane. Too bad it's getting old.
    But it is necessary to rearm, and the Su-30SM is a good choice.
    1. avt
      avt 20 October 2015 17: 47 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: theadenter
      But it is necessary to rearm, and the Su-30 is a good choice.

      laughing I suggest that the general write down an old toast, which he had forgotten about the campaign, but judging by what he dreams of by 2020, he still remembers something, I have a desire to buy a house, but I have no opportunity, I have the opportunity to buy a goat, but I have no desire. So let’s drink so that our capabilities coincide with our desires. "His Wishlist is akin to the Wishlist of our admirals to have an aircraft carrier after the year 202.
      1. theadenter 20 October 2015 17: 56 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Yes, agree, I think. laughing Not a strange country for us. As usual, political concessions and agreements will clear everything out. Not only money is beneficial to Russia.
  6. Denis DV 20 October 2015 17: 44 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Lukashenko would not engage in nonsense, Russia is the main guarantor of independence and security in Belarus. It would be better to buy rubles hi
    1. 740
      740 20 October 2015 17: 52 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Denis DV
      Lukashenko would not engage in nonsense, Russia is the main guarantor of independence and security in Belarus. It would be better to buy rubles hi

      Some kind of aircraft, this is all a trifle compared to the nuclear power plant under construction in Belarus. This is where he competently led our grandmother to grandmas. He knows how to take profit.
      1. molva73 20 October 2015 22: 03 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        I can’t understand. Do you reckon the Russian leadership for suckers or Lukashenko for a cunning devil?
  7. Alexander 3 20 October 2015 17: 46 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Not only Russia should bear the burden of defense of the CST countries. It is necessary to support our defense industrial complex with orders.
  8. robbihood 20 October 2015 18: 07 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Quote: cerbuk6155
    Acquired, only at the expense of RUSSIA, they themselves will not pay. soldier

    If you look at the allies only as parasites, and this is not so (Belarus pays for weapons), then by 2020 our Air Force can transfer to other aircraft, you will only have an extra headache.
    1. avt
      avt 20 October 2015 19: 34 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: robbihood
      then by 2020 our Air Force can transfer to other aircraft, you will only have an extra headache.

      At one time, the ambassador to Ukraine of the PMC somehow spoke out on something about which the predecessors of the current Kiev great-Ukrainian people spoke in the same vein, ,, Scared the woman with high-heeled shoes. " laughing Yes, no question - buy pennies.
      Quote: robbihood
      , you will only have an extra headache.

      Yes, we’ll survive somehow - the first time or something. We’ve got used to it — when Butska needs something, well, basically there are pennies there, the planes are different, then right away we’re the state of the state, we are covering you! As Russia needs something, well, there’s to answer for a bazaar, moreover, which no one forced him to voice publicly on the camera, in the same currency, of South Ossetia, Abkhazia, there is an aviation base there - we are a sovereign state and do not trade sovereignty!
  9. Steppe 20 October 2015 18: 17 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    I believe that we are on the verge of major historical events. I think the dollar will collapse earlier. And therefore, I believe that the United States and NATO are unlikely to survive until 2020. Therefore, they may not need fighters.
    1. With Siberian Cranes 20 October 2015 20: 34 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      What is your forecast based on?
      1. dvina71 20 October 2015 23: 32 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: With Cranes
        What is your forecast based on?


        The states run out of money on November 30th. It will be interesting how to resolve it. But in finance, the states are falling into the abyss, this is not my opinion.
        The trouble is that too fast speed down can overheat the world and then EVERYTHING will come out more expensive.
        So everyone will smile and wave, greeting another increase in the US government debt and slowly transfer reserves to other assets and arm themselves. What is already happening.
  10. Bthuk 20 October 2015 18: 32 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    after 2020

    laughing
  11. Arktidianets 20 October 2015 18: 43 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The mustachioed seeks profit everywhere, right after the re-election he started talking about the Russian air base on the territory of the Republic of Belarus, and literally a week before he said that these were all inventions of the magazine.
  12. Mercenary 20 October 2015 18: 47 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    What is really there, by 2020 take the T-50, or maybe the T-60. laughing
  13. combat66 20 October 2015 18: 49 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Good thing, this machine, as I understand it, should become the most massive in the Russian Federation? And where there is quantity, there it is easier with spare parts. Yes, and a car was created for the Russian-speaking ..... so for us. And about the type of freebie, "the old man spread for money" and so on. As I understand it, "whoever dines for the girl dances her." wink
    1. Lt. Air Force stock 20 October 2015 19: 13 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Beautiful fighter.
    2. avt
      avt 20 October 2015 19: 45 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: combat66
      . And about the type of freebie, "the old man spread for money" and so on. As I understand it, "whoever dines for the girl dances her."

      Not in the case of Butska. Here, he has never been “danced” as an adult. These airplanes of the Belarussian Air Force are unbearable, and Russia also doesn’t need to have all the associated infrastructure and pilots who are not subordinate to Russia. It would be okay if the Collective Security Treaty Organization had a single decision center obligatory for execution by ALL national units and parts included in it at least for the current moment of time. So it just DOES NOT exist and whether it will be known. So, not only money is wasted, but also scarce equipment - we get them piece by piece, rejoicing every board that took off. There’s even such a simple moment - But father, when they threw Bakiyev off, snarled, "Well, where is the CSTO !?" And about the fact that according to the constitution of Belarus it is forbidden to use its armed forces abroad - I quietly forgot to mention. Well, then who on the borders of the eastern CSTO will be clumsy ???
      1. combat66 21 October 2015 08: 04 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Do not focus on relations with the country only on one person. It is possible that it is, it is not really manageable, from which side look. no But, Russia has the opportunity to influence the minds of an entire nation, not to let it roll its brains (which was depressed by the forelocks).
        But aircraft are needed and the structure can be jointly maintained and there are enough tasks for them. Much has been said about the role of Belarus in the western direction.
        So if the question arises, How to deal with an adversary? We will not last long on sapper blades, will we rake the cradles until Russia pulls up ?! For me, both Russian bases and your equipment are needed, as it’s calmer.
        1. avt
          avt 21 October 2015 09: 09 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: combat66
          Do not focus on relations with the country only on one person

          no Even if this person determines the foreign and domestic policy in the state! ????
          Quote: combat66
          How to deal with an adversary? We will not last long on sapper blades, will we rake the cradles until Russia pulls up ?!

          Well, let's be honest - do you really think that the army of Belarus is able to withstand the NATO bloc along with Russia !? wassat Naturally, within the framework of the CSTO, Russia will solve the full-scale conflict and prevent it at the stage of threat of use of force. Do you think that Belarus’s air defense can close the western direction? Again, the functioning of such a force component is possible only if there is a single center for operational decision-making and its MANDATORY execution. Is he there? Well, besides the artistic whistle about the united air defense and Batskin’s, we’ll cover you up. “It’s not a whim of the kind of“ bending over the drain ”, it’s quite an urgent need for yourself - how many stupid situations there were during the USSR, when even with a centralized system no one I wanted to take responsibility to give the order to destroy the offender? And then how much will they coordinate? Especially when you consider the flight time from Moscow to Brest.
          Quote: combat66
          For me, Russian bases are needed

          The Russian air base would solve the issues of covering Belorussia from the air at minimal cost, but ..... I do not believe that they will agree. But father wants to at least steer. And who in their right mind and firm memory allow him to do this - give orders to the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation? Maybe he still GDP and a nuclear suitcase "vilify for the weekend will? wassat Here is something that tells me - it will be like with a single currency - long, dreary and with scandals, but actually already. So for me - it’s better to leave everything as it is and engage in arrangement in the Smolensk, Kaliningrad, Pskov regions. There is less headache, and the effect is greater, and then, over time, it may be .... someday ..... Yes, actually the campaign has already begun - there was infa that a new team is being deployed in Smolenskaya.
  14. yan 2015
    yan 2015 20 October 2015 19: 14 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    it would be necessary to immediately identify the flies separately - cutlets separately. that is, either the VKS base in Belarus. or money for the SU-30SM. THIS ALTRUISM ONE SIDE .. already looks indecent.
  15. With Siberian Cranes 20 October 2015 20: 33 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The cunning Old Man will receive them for nothing
    1. By001261 20 October 2015 23: 20 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Maybe for nothing but we don’t know about it.
  16. m-arsenich 20 October 2015 22: 10 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: robbihood
    our Air Force can transfer to other aircraft, you will only have an extra headache.


    Let me note: in this case, the headache will be for you, I suspect, even female - the migraine is called ...
  17. KnightRider 20 October 2015 22: 56 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    They will buy at domestic prices, like Kazakhstan. In any case, the old equipment, and the materiel they have since the days of the USSR, sooner or later need to be replaced with a new one. First, Kazakhstan, now Belarus, and then you look and other members of the CIS will catch up, if they have tension with money, let them provide us with their airfields for bases ...