In Syria, crashed UAV "Orlan-10"

75
Syrian rebels have discovered in the Aleppo area the Russian unmanned aerial vehicle "Orlan-10". In addition, previously reported another aircraft of unknown type, found on Turkish territory near the border with Syria, reports blog Center for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies.

In Syria, crashed UAV "Orlan-10"


The light drone Orlan-10 was developed and manufactured by Special Technological Center Ltd. and supplied by the RF Ministry of Defense from 2010. The submission notes that it is impossible to pinpoint whether the UAV data belonged to the Russian contingent in Syria or were used by Syrian government troops.

“Orlan-10 reconnaissance drone lost in the area of ​​the offensive operation of Syrian government forces southwest of Aleppo. In my opinion the first lost UAV of this type in Syria. Judging by the state of Orlan, it looks like the control was lost or some kind of breakdown occurred and he was found by the militants after a hard landing, ”the article says.
  • http://bmpd.livejournal.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

75 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +63
    19 October 2015 11: 48
    Nothing surprising and catastrophic. This technique is a consumable. Although of course it's a pity the plane.

    Like this video ...
    1. +68
      19 October 2015 11: 50
      Quote: Vladimir
      Nothing surprising and catastrophic. This technique is a consumable. Although of course it's a pity the plane.

      Yes, these are not losses, these are losses, but in war they are inevitable! The main thing is people! hi
      1. avt
        +30
        19 October 2015 12: 21
        Quote: Major Yurik
        Yes, these are not losses, these are losses, but in war they are inevitable!

        May God grant only such losses!
        1. +10
          19 October 2015 14: 30
          Judging by the fact that a parachute was thrown out, the device ran out of fuel. Yes, and damage on it is not particularly visible, therefore it was not shot down.
          1. 0
            20 October 2015 06: 28
            In Syria, crashed UAV "Orlan-10"

            First, it did not crash, but landed on a parachute.
            Secondly, there are drones, so that their loss is not a great event. One Su-34 ammunition (which he dumps on gangsters for 1 departure) probably costs more than this airplane. So no need to do a drama, lost Orn 1, and all right, we still have it.
        2. 0
          20 October 2015 01: 15
          Yes, these are not losses, these are losses, but in war they are inevitable! The main thing is people!
          May God grant only such losses!


          Nah ... God grant that only such LOSSES exist!
          In war - as in war. But I pray that this is so.
      2. +6
        19 October 2015 20: 09
        Quote: Major Yurik
        Yes, these are not losses, these are losses, but in war they are inevitable! The main thing is people! hi


        Unpleasant news from ukrobloggers. The Orlan's crew ejected and were captured by ISIS fighters. what
    2. +15
      19 October 2015 11: 54
      Still, they found the "losses" of the Russian Aerospace Forces ... Both laughter and sin!
      1. +39
        19 October 2015 12: 05
        Good exchange. 2 weeks of work, departures under 1000 and the loss of one drone! This is a peramoga!
        1. +14
          19 October 2015 12: 31
          Quote: Monos
          Good exchange. 2 weeks of work, departures under 1000 and the loss of one drone! This is a peramoga!


          Have you forgotten the August Presidential Decree on classifying information about military losses in peacetime? Or have you never heard of him? Of course, we will, as they say, keep our fists so that our guys are all intact, but ... Even if there are losses (after all, there is a war, albeit beyond the "cordon"), we will not know about them.
          1. -2
            19 October 2015 12: 39
            Quote: Colonel
            And you, the August Decree of the President on classifying information about the losses of the Armed Forces in peacetime have already been forgotten?

            It was about special forces, and not about all the Armed Forces.
            1. +23
              19 October 2015 13: 04
              Quote: Sid.74
              It was about special forces, and not about all the Armed Forces.


              Inattentively read. It was about losses of Russian troops in special operations in peacetime A special operation is being carried out in Syria. By the way, when this decree was reported, I immediately guessed that ours or already perform somewhere on the sly "international duty", or are going to to do it openly in the near future. And so it happened. My opinion as a veteran of the Armed Forces is that this is correct. After Afgan we did not "train" for a long time. And the army, in order to be "in good shape", must fight: "test" new equipment, work out new tactics of various actions (VR, guidance, strikes against various targets, control of the strike results ...), improve the control system, the organization of interaction, all types of security, etc. It is high time!
              1. +2
                19 October 2015 16: 40
                People’s losses, I think they’ll talk about technology.
            2. 0
              20 October 2015 00: 23
              Quote: Sid.74
              It was about special forces, and not about all the Armed Forces.

              and the special forces units are not military personnel or law enforcement officers? only two GRU and SVR offices can be used behind the cordon.
          2. +9
            19 October 2015 12: 47
            No, I didn’t read it. And the militants with smartphones and access to the network also did not read. And aliens - even more so.
          3. +15
            19 October 2015 12: 58
            Quote: Colonel
            Even if there are losses (the war is still, albeit beyond the "cordon"), we will not find out about them.


            if there are losses in the form of our downed planes, we will immediately find out. Yes, and how do you imagine the possibility of concealing the loss of an aircraft that was shot down over the territory controlled by the militants? .No. The militants will remove the wreckage of a downed plane on the ground from all angles and put it on the net like this drone.
            What I like about our such drones is that they are not recorded on the built-in storage medium (hdd, flash memory), but the information is directly transmitted to the ground to the operator where the recording takes place. On the drone itself there is only RAM for caching data before sending it to the operator. putting the drone out of action, apart from the joy that "we flunked the drone," the enemy does not receive any information that this drone managed to take off.
          4. +3
            19 October 2015 13: 44
            Quote: Colonel
            we will not know about them.

            We don’t know, but be sure to tell us, and it would be much worse if the hedgehogs would have reported from the Moscow Region.
            1. +1
              19 October 2015 13: 48
              Quote: tomket
              We don’t know, but be sure to tell us, and it would be much worse if the hedgehogs would have reported from the Moscow Region.


              I agree. Therefore, this Decree was appealed in court, but the Supreme Court decided that everything was right. (Well, who would doubt it. Try to say that GDP is wrong ...).
        2. +2
          19 October 2015 13: 07
          Monos
          Good exchange. 2 weeks of work, departures under 1000 and the loss of one drone! This is a peramoga!

          Sorry, but ... perhaps ... SUCCESS ... and PERAMOG is already in Kiev ... it's not for nothing that they, with their "secret weapon in the form of a slingshot" ... directly from the Independence Square "knocked down" on Bl. There are already three planes in the East ...
          True ... except for a slingshot and a thousand words, there is no other evidence! No ... no! But we must believe the most "objective and operational" in the world ... Dill's media !!!
          Petya (though only after thirds ...) and Senya are a rabbit ... for example ...-- BELIEVE!
          1. +7
            19 October 2015 13: 19
            Quote: KazaK Bo
            Sorry, but ... perhaps ... SUCCESS ... and PERAMOGA is already in Kiev.


            Stylistic error. I meant: peramoga for militants and "partners". smile
        3. 0
          19 October 2015 14: 04
          Video of a direct missile hit in MI-8. It is not clear when this happened, I hope the pilots were saved.
          https://youtu.be/idYwDPtiYxY
          1. +4
            19 October 2015 15: 22
            Quote: Nikolai K
            Video of a direct hit by a missile in MI-8. It is not clear when this happened.I hope the pilots were saved.
            https://youtu.be/idYwDPtiYxY

            It happened three years ago.
            Then the helicopter landed anyway and it’s like Libya
            and yet this vidyuhu maydanutye as can post under "fresh" sauce-the loss of Russia in Syria.

            Here the question is different, in Assad's aviation, MANPADS militants used, so it was and it means it will appear just as easily ... and all this will be like ala from the arsenals of either Libya .. or someone else .. who was not spared by the Arab "spring ".
      2. 0
        19 October 2015 12: 06
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Still, they found the "losses" of the Russian Aerospace Forces ... Both laughter and sin!

        50 to 50. It is possible that this drone belonged to the Syrian army. The fact that he is not written anywhere.
      3. +4
        19 October 2015 12: 13
        Well did not think of dragging into Turkish territory and screaming about violating the border
        1. +2
          19 October 2015 21: 09
          Quote: sir_obs
          Well did not think of dragging into Turkish territory and screaming about violating the border

          Turkish authorities have confirmed that the downed drone was made in Russia. This was stated by Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu in an interview with AHaber TV channel. The incident with a drone shot down on the Turkish-Syrian border has a "deterrent effect," Davutoglu added.
          At the same time, he expressed the hope that now Russian planes will behave more cautiously.

          It seems to me that nifiga they did not shoot down anything, because the drone is almost intact, if a rocket or fluff were poked at it - only horns and legs would remain. And how did they determine that this UAV is ours? Is it "made in Russia" written there? Moreover, they called it a secret development! smile
      4. +10
        19 October 2015 12: 34
        The parachute was released, it means it did not crash. Interestingly, the mujahni took it with them ... what And then the navigator can work.wink
        1. +3
          19 October 2015 17: 37
          An interesting tactic, to invite more "bearded men" to a downed bird, and then zhahnut from something high-precision))) So to speak, disposal ...
        2. +2
          19 October 2015 22: 37
          Quote: Sid.74
          He released the parachute, so it did not crash.

          Moreover, when he touched the ground, he shot him, so as not to damage the already landed one by the wind. There is either a deliberate loss (he worked far from the front line and, after completing the task, he was thrown specifically as a consumable), or when landing, he was assigned to the shaitans. Somehow nonsense.
      5. +6
        19 October 2015 12: 35
        Quote: MIKHAN
        And laughter and sin!

        Post about the epic with downed "Russian" UAVs in Ukraine and Turkey
        lol
        http://www.yaplakal.com/forum2/topic1226686.html
        1. +4
          19 October 2015 12: 52
          Quote: Dryuya2
          Quote: MIKHAN
          And laughter and sin!

          Post about the epic with downed "Russian" UAVs in Ukraine and Turkey
          lol
          http://www.yaplakal.com/forum2/topic1226686.html

          there Chinese-made commercial was ...
          Below is a photo from an alibaba.
          The tail unit is different from the ukroain and the first in Syria. And a little more kopkitom. And that’s all ...
          1. 0
            19 October 2015 13: 58
            Quote: Rus2012
            And a little more kopkitom. And that’s all ...

            UAV cockpit? what
            1. +3
              19 October 2015 14: 04
              Quote: novobranets
              UAV cockpit?

              ... well, let there be a hood in the engine compartment. Arranged?

              1. +2
                19 October 2015 14: 29
                Then I understood. And in fact, in other words, the cockpit is a inhabited compartment. hi
      6. +1
        19 October 2015 13: 42
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Still, they found the "losses" of the Russian Aerospace Forces ... Both laughter and sin!

        Considering that the other day they stated that all planes and drones returned to the base and are safe, and the statements of Turkey are a dirty-fabricated lie composed in a cafe-chantan ..... The sediment remained .......
    3. +3
      19 October 2015 12: 15
      Well then ... Run the next one!
    4. +2
      19 October 2015 12: 19
      nonsense, but they so want!
    5. +1
      19 October 2015 12: 33
      This is an ordinary cartridge case (figuratively), and the bullet itself is where we need it!
    6. +1
      19 October 2015 13: 07
      it was necessary at this moment to throw a bomb there as the militants approached
    7. +2
      19 October 2015 17: 23
      judging by the beeping of a timer, it’s worth getting closer to him) there is also a glonas suddenly who will drag him into cover!
  2. +2
    19 October 2015 11: 48
    Syrian rebels discovered in the Aleppo region the Russian unmanned aerial vehicle Orlan-10. In addition, previously it was reported about another aircraft of an unknown type, found on Turkish territory near the border with Syria, the blog of the Center for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies reports.


    Turks let their fakes smile ..... is not yet so professional .... but they learn quickly from the Anglo-Saxons.
    1. +1
      19 October 2015 11: 52
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      Turks let their fakes

      Maybe it’s not a fake ... there is no war without losses :: it means they will correct the tactics of use - nothing bad happened.
      1. +2
        19 October 2015 11: 56
        On the territory of TURKEY, an unknown drone was shot down, it was warned three times and then shot down .....

        in the Russian Aerospace Forces there are no fools to do such stupid things ... so this is definitely a fake and most likely the Turks want to hang another international scandal on RUSSIA with far-reaching consequences.
    2. +5
      19 October 2015 11: 54
      It’s just Orlan, the Turks have nothing to do with it.
      It is also necessary to order drones and preferably drums.
  3. +7
    19 October 2015 11: 50
    Unfortunately, given the number of flights, this was inevitable. Well, that's okay. I think the Yankers will not learn anything new.
    1. -1
      19 October 2015 12: 11
      Quote: AYUJAK
      I think the Yankers will not learn anything new.

      You are undoubtedly right, there the whole filling is foreign, for the Americans nothing interesting
  4. +2
    19 October 2015 11: 50
    Developed by Orlan denied these rumors, this is not Orlan
    1. +2
      19 October 2015 11: 57
      This about the "Turkish" Orlan was denied. The developers do not say anything about this one yet (at least for now).
    2. The comment was deleted.
  5. +3
    19 October 2015 11: 51
    So it’s no secret that our drones are used there. Losses are also possible - war. What is the sensation?
  6. +7
    19 October 2015 11: 51
    Well lost, then what? The offensive because of this will not stop, and this machine is for this purpose designed to replace a person with himself in any conditions.
  7. Bor
    +4
    19 October 2015 11: 52
    Alager com alager ...
  8. +3
    19 October 2015 11: 53
    An occasion for all kinds of gloating to talk or jump ...
    He laughs who laughs last.
  9. +5
    19 October 2015 11: 58
    Well, it began ... Losses of the Russian Aerospace Forces !!!! And no one thought that the UAV has a resource? Some 10 flights, some 50. The Orlan could well have developed a resource, which is why it landed without any outside help. There, after all, drones are hanging in the sky almost around the clock.
  10. +16
    19 October 2015 11: 59
    I’ll go to the censor to see how the Ukrainians rejoice. Surely they will make this day a national holiday.
  11. +2
    19 October 2015 12: 01
    They pulled the parachute out of it, or escaped by parachute, by emergency command? Yes, in general, and no difference. With so many flights, such incidents are inevitable.
    1. +4
      19 October 2015 12: 19
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      They pulled a parachute out of it, or was it saved by parachute, by emergency command?

      The launch of the Orlan-10 unmanned vehicle is carried out with a collapsible catapult, parachute landing.
  12. +22
    19 October 2015 12: 01
    the Russians also lost 26 KR, and who knows tons of bombs.
  13. +4
    19 October 2015 12: 05
    Let them dance in the circle of him, ours is safe and good, but for this they did it so that our soldiers would not be wasted.
  14. +4
    19 October 2015 12: 05
    It seems that besides alla, I'm in a bar, these uchkuduks don’t know anything else
  15. +4
    19 October 2015 12: 08
    I think he contributed to the victory over the terrorists, he made
  16. +11
    19 October 2015 12: 19
    The Turks shot down a rather ancient UAV (T-16) of the first modification without a vertical take-off and landing system, this is an American-made apparatus, whose they are not up to date but rather their own, just to hesitate to talk about it ...
  17. +3
    19 October 2015 12: 20
    What difference does it make who "lost", Russia, Syria, but it is necessary to find out the reason, countermeasures of electronic warfare, operator error, malfunction of the device itself, and a lot of reasons, it is simply stupid to consider this loss as a tragedy
  18. +3
    19 October 2015 12: 21
    - stated in the material.
    In what nafig material listen to the Russian Defense Ministry, not the Pentagon!
  19. +2
    19 October 2015 12: 23
    There is nothing to discuss during the operation of the drone there, everything once breaks. And whose information he still does not have, if it was produced in Russia, this does not mean that it is ours.
  20. +3
    19 October 2015 12: 25
    It would be nice to make drones so smart that they explode in enemy captivity when the enemy approaches. And then he squeals so that the Mujahideen are clearly dumb to approach him.
  21. 0
    19 October 2015 12: 25
    Nothing more than a couple of volleys of our ships and no one will shoot at the Eagles.
  22. +4
    19 October 2015 12: 30
    If you put a self-liquidator or a sensor in the drone to approach the enemy’s manpower, an interesting effect would be obtained.
  23. +5
    19 October 2015 12: 33
    This should be treated philosophically, God gave God took. Inanimate object fell so what? We have bombs and missiles every day there are tons falling, I also lose losses. We rivet a bunch more, human life is a loss, and this is all mouse fuss.
  24. +3
    19 October 2015 12: 35
    Maybe the resource of the engine is over ...
    Today is not such a complicated thing.
    All one - cheaper than a "full-size" scout.
  25. +4
    19 October 2015 12: 43
    Syrian rebels

    This alone should be alarming about the reliability of the information.
  26. yan 2015
    +5
    19 October 2015 12: 55
    It’s better to lose the BeSpilotnik as a consumable. Than a pilot with an airplane. And so the terrain was reconstructed by this drone. They needed to wait for the Rooks with suspended KAB-500.
  27. +5
    19 October 2015 13: 01
    And why with a parachute if crashed? Maybe they didn’t land there? Or is it an emergency revealed by him? Although it’s kind of broken. And squeaks yet, then the data probably transmits, in vain they gathered around it, it may fly if they hang out for another hour laughing
    And of course it’s not a loss, so, consumables ...
  28. +3
    19 October 2015 13: 41
    Figs with him, with iron, most importantly, people did not suffer
  29. +11
    19 October 2015 13: 53
    A pair of lost small UAVs in three weeks is
    zero losses. Nonsense.
    1. +2
      19 October 2015 17: 24
      Quote: voyaka uh
      A pair of lost small UAVs in three weeks is
      zero losses. Nonsense

      Where did the pair come from? The first drone is definitely not ours !!! How much can you drive this blizzard? Understand that any programmer (middle peasant) will determine whose, whose and where from !!! Since it’s silent, then it’s definitely not ours. If there was any some clue for the Russian, then all WESTERN media were already fighting, would be in ecstasy and screaming at all the voices.
  30. +2
    19 October 2015 14: 03
    Quote: Vladimir
    Nothing surprising and catastrophic. This technique is a consumable. Although of course it's a pity the plane.

    Like this video ...

    It was okay, dialing, even respect was for the ships that came to the port after a strong storm, with washed out rescue rafts or circles ...!
  31. 0
    19 October 2015 14: 15
    It can be assumed that hackers are at work. As comrade Semibab said, "On their SS we will find our own CCC."
  32. +7
    19 October 2015 14: 22
    What did the West want to tell everyone that the loss of Russian UAVs in Syria is comparable to the loss in October of the 2015 of the US military transport aircraft C-130 in Afghanistan !?
    1. -1
      19 October 2015 16: 23
      and who compares? Besides you will burst open ..
  33. +1
    19 October 2015 19: 12
    Why there is no self-destruction mechanism in drones. In my opinion, it would be more effective than a bomb here - once and several bandits are gone. The flaw however ...
    1. 0
      20 October 2015 01: 33
      Why there is no self-destruction mechanism in drones. In my opinion, it would be more effective than a bomb here - once and several bandits are gone. The flaw however ...


      Who knows where he will fall? What if the kids run up? Do we need it?

      And the extra weight.
  34. +2
    19 October 2015 21: 28
    The original article also states that "it is impossible to say with certainty whether the apparatus that fell in the Aleppo region belonged to the Russian contingent in Syria, or was used Syrian government forces... It should be noted that at the MAKS-2015 air show, JSC Rosoboronexport distributed promotional materials about the export version of the Orlan-10 UAV, designated as the Orlan-10E.
    In addition, a few days ago in the province of Hama was lost Iranian UAV - Mohajer-4 new version. Here it is already more broken, perhaps it was knocked out. In any case, similar tactical UAVs, like Orlan-10 and Mohajer-4, are largely consumables during conflicts of this magnitude, their losses are inevitable.

    On my own behalf, I will add that in Donbass Ukrainians shot down our (militia) "Eagles", and even OSCE drones, in turn, militias also shot down Ukrainian drones. And there was no particular hype.

    Pictured Iranian UAV - Mohajer-4 in Syria
  35. +2
    20 October 2015 00: 44
    Everyone urgently!
    In Turkey, right in Istanbul, the ultra-modern and super-classified UAV of the Russian Armed Forces crashed, and there is no doubt about their belonging!
    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2015/055/panv37.jpg

    :D

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"