Military Review

Why does Putin win the new cold war?

97
Why does Putin win the new cold war?



There are billion people on the planet 7,2, but the United States fears only one person - Vladimir Putin. This is because on almost every front of the new cold war, the president of Russia is worthily opposing the collective challenge of the West. Forbes magazine named Putin the most influential person in the world.

Putin said about the Russians that they harnessed for a long time, but they drive very fast. After patiently restoring the Russian economy from 1999 to 2007 a year, Putin spoke out against the western environment of his country. In Syria, in the Crimea and Ukraine, the West has faced humiliating failures. The stakes are high — they will be Russian (not Western pipelines) and they will dominate Eurasia.

Scorekeeping cannot understand how Putin managed to save Russia and leads in this game.
More than any other leader, the president of Russia, because of his experience, the KGB understands how the United States works. The American course of action, in sync with the British, is the organization of coups, insurrections and counterrevolutions in countries where nationalist leaders come to power. Iran, Chile, Ecuador, Venezuela, Panama and Ukraine are classic examples.

John Perkins writes in the Confession of Economic Hitman (2004), as he and other Hitmen, were sent to developing countries as consultants, bribing or forcing diplomats, economists, administrators and politicians to fulfill the will of the United States. Often they succeeded, but if failure follows, the CIA sends "jackals" - professionally trained killers who physically eliminate those who stood in the way of complete American domination.

This double blow to the economy was so effective that in the banana republics the United States rarely lost. Among rare cases, Iraq and Libya, where the US had to use armed forces in the pursuit of commercial goals.

Putin knows that the United States has tried and will continue to try to change the regime in Russia. As a former KGB officer stationed in East Germany, he knows that the killers are looking for such an opportunity. That is why he refused to agencies such as USAID and the British Council, both of which are a cover for the Anglo-American special services.

"One of the things to understand why he is a critical player is that Putin studied the intelligence of the enemy, which is key to understanding," writes Joaquin Flores on the website at the Center for Syncretic Research. “Counterintelligence is not easy to find spies, it’s actually countering the work of other agents who are embedded or whose work involves fully investing themselves to destroy the institutions from within.”

The economy of the USA and its close friend of Great Britain is a military economy. Kremlin adviser Sergei Glazyev said at a round table in June in Moscow: "Americans benefited from every war in Europe - the First World War, the Second World War, the Cold War. The wars in Europe are the means of their economic miracle, their own well-being."

The ongoing conflicts in Ukraine have become a clear excuse to provoke Russia into direct military confrontation with the Ukrainian armed forces, in order to create a regional war in Europe.

Russia's response has become ambiguous.

First, by refusing to enter into a military conflict with Ukrainian gangsters, she greatly disappointed the Americans. Washington’s inaction in Ukraine was brilliantly described by the Chinese general as a symptom of America’s strategic "erectile dysfunction".

Secondly, Putin applies asymmetrical strategies that help stop and, ultimately, reduce the influence of the American empire. The main element of this strategy is a blow to the key basis of American power - the dollar. Russia, with the support of colleagues from BRICS, China, India, Brazil and South Africa, is moving away from dollar trade, a step that will seriously affect the barely growing American economy.

According to the financial portal zero hedging:

“Glazyev’s countermeasures complex is specifically focused on the main force of the US military machine, that is, the Fed printing press. Putin’s advisor proposes the creation of a« wide alliance against dollar countries that are willing and able to drop the dollar on the international market. Alliance members also refrain from doing reserves in dollars. The anti-dollar coalition will be the first step to create an anti-war coalition that can help stop US aggression. ”

Ukraine, in the end, may be a catalyst for the rupture of Europe and the United States. The reason is that sanctions against Russia threaten business houses in Germany and other Western European countries, which have developed deep ties with the Russian economy over the past two decades. “Somewhat surprising to Washington, the war for Ukraine may soon become the war for Europe’s independence from the United States and the war against the dollar,” says the zero hedging portal.

Moscow also favors institutional change. The $ 100 billion of the New Development Bank, co-owner of which is BRICS, will not only resist the influence of Western credit institutions, but also stop the flow of funds from developing countries to the West.

The current lending system is skewed in favor of Western countries, since the World Bank and the IMF loans a basket on their terms. For example, when they offer a loan, it can be used to buy goods and services only from the West. Or the loan can only be used for the construction of dams, and not on, say, a public water supply network.

Of course, the schemes and material for construction dams should come from the USA and Europe. And when the drinking water supply network becomes unusable, it creates a demand for cola and bottled water, which are mainly owned by Western producers. Therefore, the new bank hit the West hard enough.

Putin is taking the right steps on a geopolitical chessboard, but his opponents are not idle. The Russian ruble fell into a vice, oil prices lead to the land of Saudi Arabia at the auction of their American overlords. There are no surprises here - the Americans will ruthlessly try to weaken Russia, since this is the only country that stands between Washington and world domination.

Nevertheless, Putin is an athlete who knows how to use the power of his opponent against the opponent himself. He knows the days of the apogee of the West are over, and they are not able to influence the Russian military. He is closely following the strategy of the Americans, directed against Russia, at the same time trying to restrain the unbridled growth of the BRICS.

Putin was lucky that BRICS became his heavyweight partner, and he will continue to support Russia in its confrontation with the West. India and China agreed that Moscow has legitimate interests in Ukraine and the Crimea. The BRICS countries condemned Australia for the reckless proposal to ban Putin from attending the G20 summit.

Such guarantees of support gave courage to Putin and made it possible to put the West in place. In 2012, he casually missed the G8 summit, and earlier this year, he only shrugged when G8 returned to G7 - the configuration of the pre-cold war. (With elements like Canada, G7 is a joke, anyway.)

If история and teaches us something - this is what Russia has the habit of hitting its enemies. After Napoleon and Hitler, it may be the turn of the Americans, it is necessary to understand the danger of hounding a Russian bear.
Author:
Originator:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/why-putin-is-winning-the-new-cold-war/5417041
97 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Mera joota
    Mera joota 19 October 2015 05: 57 New
    31
    Does the repetition of the endless mantras that "Putin all won" help to abstract from what is happening outside the window and believe in what you really want?
    Why does Putin win the new cold war?

    I have a counter question:
    WHY PUTIN LOSES WAR AGAINST OFFICIALS?
    1. Passer
      Passer 19 October 2015 06: 02 New
      51
      Quote: Mera Joota

      I have a counter question:
      WHY PUTIN LOSES WAR AGAINST OFFICIALS?

      Because our officials are worse and more dangerous than ISIS and NATO combined.
      1. Finches
        Finches 19 October 2015 06: 15 New
        11
        I do not draw historical parallels - this is not the most grateful business, nevertheless, the thought came to my mind that the foreign policy of GDP is very similar to the aspirations of Nicholas I!

        The main thing that the emperor wanted at that time was to strengthen the new borders of his state, subjugate Finland, Poland and the Baltic states to the interests of Russia, control over the Black Sea, the Caucasus, develop the Far Eastern borders ... In addition, Nicholas I considered ensuring stability in Europe as a priority. Nobody really heard about America then, but the Englishwoman spoiled Russia with the help of the French and Ottomans - do not grieve for your mother, which resulted in several bloody warriors ...

        Now is not the 19th century, but the 21st, but in fact the relations of our states in the geopolitical space have not changed!
        1. nils
          nils 19 October 2015 08: 59 New
          17
          Quote: Finches
          Now is not the 19th century, but the 21th,


          Let it be known to you that the problem of Russia is not that it cannot feed the poor, but that the rich will not get drunk in any way.

          - Vladimir Vladimirovich, how can one live to retire?
          - What is happening in Syria, have you seen?
          - BUT...
          - And in Kiev, what a mess?
          - But ...
          - The next question.

          After the president’s television communication with the people:
          - So, dear students, the task. Inflation rose over the year by 30%, salaries and pensions have not changed. How much has the standard of living of the population dropped?
          - At 30%.
          - Wrong.
          - At 40%, taking into account the increase in loan rates.
          - Wrong.
          - At 45%, taking into account loans and exchange rates.
          - Wrong. The correct answer is 3%. And don't ask me why!
          1. Finches
            Finches 19 October 2015 09: 57 New
            +3
            So it always has been! Eka is unseen ... And what can you personally suggest how to counter this?
            1. lelikas
              lelikas 19 October 2015 11: 12 New
              18
              As one of the simplest options - to make the salaries of all officials, ministers and deputies no more than 5 living wages, cancel all their benefits, introduce a regular lie detector test and tighten liability, confiscate all property during arrest. In cases of violation of the law - a complete ban on working in any state-owned company or a company with partial state participation. Reduce by three times the number of their assistants and assistant assistants. It is forbidden to work with relatives' companies, to finally revive the OBHSS. Only this will help to save about a quarter of the budget (or a little less).
              This is for starters, it will be seen where to move on.
              1. larand
                larand 19 October 2015 12: 07 New
                +9
                Quote: lelikas
                As one of the simplest options - to make the salary of all officials, ministers and deputies no more than 5 living wages ....


                Well, you are my friend and storyteller. Although fairy tales become true. Only here you will not have to live fine at that time .....
                1. lelikas
                  lelikas 19 October 2015 14: 55 New
                  +8
                  Quote: larand
                  Well, you are my friend and storyteller. Although fairy tales become true. Only here you will not have to live fine at that time .....

                  A fairy tale is when deputies set their own salaries - it seemed to them a little - they voted - increased - this is where the fairy tale ...
                  And see whether or not - rather not, but I want to.
                  1. Penzyac
                    Penzyac 19 October 2015 19: 36 New
                    +1
                    Quote: lelikas
                    Quote: larand
                    Well, you are my friend and storyteller. Although fairy tales become true. Only here you will not have to live fine at that time .....

                    A fairy tale is when deputies set their own salaries - it seemed to them a little - they voted - increased - this is where the fairy tale ...
                    And see whether or not - rather not, but I want to.

                    Well, they set the Laws for themselves. Now, if, for a start, it would be constitutionally prohibit the establishment of "salaries" for any officials and deputies of the current term (to establish only for "successors") and not change throughout the entire term of office ... Will they vote (business-ties) for this? ... If the President himself comes up with the initiative, will they kick up? ...
                  2. Uncle Joe
                    Uncle Joe 20 October 2015 00: 58 New
                    0
                    Quote: lelikas
                    A fairy tale is when deputies set their own salaries - it seemed to them a little - they voted - increased - this is where the fairy tale ...
                    And you can’t argue - really a fairy tale.

                    The salary of State Duma deputies from September 1, 2013 increased to 253 rubles a month in accordance with a decree on increasing monetary remuneration to federal ministers signed by Russian President Vladimir Putin, Interfax reported on Wednesday citing sources in the lower house of the Russian parliament.
                    http://www.forbes.ru/news/246960-putin-povysil-deputatam-gosdumy-zarplatu-do-254
                    -000-rublei

                    Deputies are equated by law with federal ministers.
              2. Finches
                Finches 19 October 2015 15: 27 New
                +5
                The proposal is probably not bad, but in order to bring it to life, I think I need to start classically: "... take a) a telephone, b) a telegraph, c) railway stations ..." and so on! laughing

                I am not inciting to overthrow the existing system, but simply stating the fact that under the current political and economic formation, your proposals are a little utopian!

                Yours! hi
                1. lelikas
                  lelikas 19 October 2015 18: 33 New
                  0
                  Quote: Finches
                  I am not inciting to overthrow the existing system, but simply stating the fact that under the current political and economic formation, your proposals are a little utopian!

                  I would say a little radical, but effective. There would be a desire.
                  For all the above parameters, we overtook the Soviet Union at times, and after all everything worked there, with a larger number of people and the country.
                  The same people's deputies - received sn at the place of work, it would not even have occurred to them to demand a salary, and even more so to establish it themselves.
                  The ministers somehow traveled to the Volga and didn’t feel destitute.
                  Here I recall a joke about Chapaev, who solved the problem with food by putting two machine guns at the rear exits from the store:
                  “Why two?”
                  - So one overheated ...

                  Otherwise, we will continue to have either Babskiy battalions, then red ministers, or governors collecting pens for lyam apiece.

                  GDP must, or rather is obliged to prepare such a replacement for itself so that it does not depend on different "families", oligarchs and other clans. Then you can safely bend your line.
                  1. Finches
                    Finches 19 October 2015 18: 36 New
                    +1
                    Unfortunately, the oligarchy or the nomenclature of the bureaucratic stratum is such a parasite that it develops under any system, unfortunately, under the monarchy, under democracy, under socialism, dictatorship ... only to be called differently, but the meaning is the same! Such is human nature ..!Alas!
                    1. Uncle Joe
                      Uncle Joe 20 October 2015 01: 05 New
                      +1
                      Quote: Finches
                      Unfortunately, the oligarchy or the nomenclature of the bureaucratic stratum is such a parasite that it develops under any system, unfortunately, under the monarchy, under democracy, under socialism, dictatorship ... it’s only called differently, but there’s only one meaning!
                      And the way to press the oligarchy to the nail, and then completely eliminate it, is also only one - now Mukhin was sent to jail for his propaganda.
                2. Palladium900
                  Palladium900 19 October 2015 21: 12 New
                  -2
                  After your proposal, an example of our Ukrainian non-brothers somehow immediately appeared before my eyes. Those, too, ran to take the telephone-telegraph .. As a result, they smashed their country, a sea of ​​blood and the authorities had even bigger ghouls than they were. The same can be said about the results of the seizure of a telegraph-telephone in Russia in 1917 .. As you wish, but I am against such "non-incitement to overthrow the existing system." Yours faithfully hi
                  1. Finches
                    Finches 19 October 2015 21: 30 New
                    0
                    Alexander, so this is what we are talking about - that to achieve a radical breakdown of ideology in Russia, for some reason it turns out only by destruction "to the ground, and then ..." And what is most interesting is that the ideology of total theft and betrayal in Russia is solved in a similar way even with old times - remember Ivan the Terrible and his oprichnina ... Mentality, probably!
                    1. Palladium900
                      Palladium900 20 October 2015 01: 02 New
                      0
                      So I say that experience shows that all these breakdowns "to the bottom" end in even greater hemorrhoids. Alas .. Who will break? Do you know them? Do you trust them? Me not. Are you ready to lay down your own head in the struggle for a radical demolition of ideology? Moreover, even though the real swindlers like these are trying to lead this fight: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uctWey587X0 Yes, they will break, build and will not steal .. And yet, is it worth it themselves to destroy your not the worst state in the world for the sake of a mythical change in someone's mentality, especially now, when there is already enough enemy?
              3. Foxmara
                Foxmara 19 October 2015 16: 17 New
                +5
                No. Just snap ZP officials to

                - GDP growth
                - the welfare of citizens of the most vulnerable layers (teachers, doctors)

                If there is growth on both counts - get a bonus, no - sit on the salary, which is also tied to the salary of doctors.
                1. Lenin
                  Lenin 19 October 2015 20: 10 New
                  0
                  Better not to salaries, but to the quality of life of the people.
              4. Penzyac
                Penzyac 19 October 2015 19: 28 New
                +1
                Quote: lelikas
                As one of the simplest options - to make the salaries of all officials, ministers and deputies no more than 5 living wages, cancel all their benefits, introduce a regular lie detector test and tighten liability, confiscate all property during arrest. In cases of violation of the law - a complete ban on working in any state-owned company or a company with partial state participation. Reduce by three times the number of their assistants and assistant assistants. It is forbidden to work with relatives' companies, to finally revive the OBHSS. Only this will help to save about a quarter of the budget (or a little less).
                This is for starters, it will be seen where to move on.

                I’m only afraid that in this case only semi will go to the officials ... - not quite smart, in short ...
                Now, if, as under the communists, this will be the best of the opportunities (for those striving to be "successful"), then maybe ... But, then, at least, it will not be a liberal market model, but a "totalitarian regime" (according to liberals) ...
                1. Lenin
                  Lenin 19 October 2015 20: 14 New
                  +3
                  You shouldn’t be so. Under communists there were more business executives. I found it myself, the true war veterans were especially fair, and encouraged if well done, but they could also be a lyuley, if I messed up publicly with my own hands. hi
              5. Lenin
                Lenin 19 October 2015 20: 07 New
                0
                Thank you, it would be in my power to put you pluses.
            2. jktu66
              jktu66 20 October 2015 00: 26 New
              0
              Russia's problem is not that it cannot feed the poor, but that the rich will not get drunk.
              Well, get rich and set an example of what to do
        2. jktu66
          jktu66 20 October 2015 00: 17 New
          0
          GDP foreign policy is very similar to the aspirations of Nicholas I!
          The President, in my opinion, is smarter and more visionary of the Emperor. And his politics are somewhat deeper and more thoughtful.
        3. jktu66
          jktu66 20 October 2015 00: 25 New
          -2
          Now is not the 19th century, but the 21st, but in fact the relations of our states in the geopolitical space have not changed!
          The essence is the same, an economic war is going on against Russia. In 1808, due to a forced alliance with Napoleonic France and joining the continental blockade of England, Russia lost its market for grain, which brought the main income to the state. The ruble lost in purchasing power by 4-5 times. Then, grain, now oil, everything repeats.
      2. science fiction writer
        science fiction writer 19 October 2015 08: 13 New
        +2

        Because our officials are worse and more dangerous than ISIS and NATO combined.

        These, officials, must be sent on a campaign against ISIS and NATO. laughing
      3. The comment was deleted.
    2. samarin1969
      samarin1969 19 October 2015 07: 06 New
      +7
      "WHY IS PUTIN LOSING THE WAR AGAINST THE OFFICIALS?"
      invisible war with invisible result
      1. nils
        nils 19 October 2015 09: 09 New
        +7
        Quote: samarin1969
        "WHY IS PUTIN LOSING THE WAR AGAINST THE OFFICIALS?"
        invisible war with invisible result


        To fly to the government - you must have a gravity! The government on another planet lives ... native.
    3. Aksakal_07
      Aksakal_07 19 October 2015 07: 07 New
      +3
      An open and tough fight, essentially a war, with officials would lead to a deep split in Russian society. And Putin would have lost, because unlike Stalin’s capabilities at the turning point in history, he has no levers of influence like the CPSU, ideologically loyal masses of special services and security officials, deputies, directors of state enterprises. Start a war with the apparatus now, Putin would repeat the fate of all the failed reformers in Russia.
      The war with bureaucracy, apparently, will begin at the final stage of Putin's reform of Russia.
      1. Mera joota
        Mera joota 19 October 2015 09: 06 New
        +5
        Quote: Aksakal_07
        An open and tough fight, essentially a war, with officials would lead to a deep split in Russian society.

        Do you think that officials are a kind of a single organized organism with a high degree of security? Come on, "every man for himself" - that's their slogan.
        More than anything else, officials are afraid of publicity and transparency, who prevents the use of these tools?
        Quote: Aksakal_07
        The war with bureaucracy, apparently, will begin at the final stage of Putin's reform of Russia.

        How can one reform the structure of the key points of which are incapable?
        1. BMW
          BMW 19 October 2015 09: 35 New
          +2
          Quote: Mera Joota
          How can one reform the structure of the key points of which are incapable?

          Yes easily, and even without any upheavals, just on this issue, no one and "did not move a horn" for 15 years. What to expect from complete inaction. No.
        2. Aksakal_07
          Aksakal_07 19 October 2015 12: 26 New
          +4
          In modern Russia, state capitalism dominates. (Well, that’s how it happened. If oligarchic capitalism were there, the country would break up.) And under state capitalism (and military communism), the basic element is a state official. Let's remove the official - the system will fall apart.
          Recall our recent history. Only the lazy did not scold the CPSU. They thought we’ll remove a bad batch, everything will be chiki-farts. Removed: first, the 7th article from the Constitution of the USSR (on the leading role of the CPSU), then the party itself from power. And everything crumbled.
          What to do? I do not know. While there is no one to replace a government official. For its theoretical replacement by individualistic capitalists will become the replacement of the bad with the worse.
          Probably, we need new personnel in large numbers. And where to get them? Create a good party on the principle of the CPSU? This is hardly possible in principle. Yes, and you can’t enter the same river twice.
          I am sure of one thing: the "successful managers" and the rest of the Russians who have remained on the beans will never have a common unifying idea. For the privatizers, the Motherland is where there is profit, for us - Russia forever! And ordinary Russians will give their lives for the Fatherland, not the oligarchs and not even the middle class, dreaming of getting out "to the top."
          1. sa-ag
            sa-ag 19 October 2015 17: 24 New
            0
            Quote: Aksakal_07
            While there is no one to replace a government official.

            By computer, outline the range of tasks, formalize, draw up algorithms, write and test software
      2. BMW
        BMW 19 October 2015 09: 30 New
        +3
        Quote: Aksakal_07
        The war with bureaucracy, apparently, will begin at the final stage of Putin's reform of Russia.

        Very compelling, especially the keyword "apparently". I understood you so that never. And if we take into account the results of the discussion of Okhlobystin's article with the main topic "CORONATION OF GDP IN EMPERORS", then this means that never at all and even in principle.
      3. frollog
        frollog 19 October 2015 16: 12 New
        +1
        And who are the judges? I mean, who can control the officials? The same officials, only from other departments. And who can pass laws? Again, only officials. Repressive measures will be used only against those who go against the line of the "party".
        IMHO, the only option for relatively "honest" government is to delegate the function of control over the pitiful little people to AI with open source code. In short, death to humans - glory to robots! But this, unfortunately, is from the realm of fantasy, although technically it is already realizable.
    4. shinobi
      shinobi 19 October 2015 07: 11 New
      +4
      To crush, i.e. to make officials and businessmen work properly, it is necessary to deprive them of their support from the outside, because after all, as soon as he is kicked or held accountable, he is immediately an oppositionist. And grants, human rights activists, etc., begin when each of this fraternity ceases to hope for the West and business, and the punishment will become dull and not run away to the west again, then. And for this you need to wean the west from poking your nose into our affairs. And there are only two ways. Either completely self-isolation, or beat everyone who crawls into the hands and faces our affairs. So correctness basically does everything GDP.
      1. Stirbjorn
        Stirbjorn 19 October 2015 13: 28 New
        +2
        Quote: shinobi
        To crush, i.e. to make officials and businessmen work correctly, you need to deprive them of their support from the outside. After all, he’s only kicked or held accountable, and he’s immediately an oppositionist.
        Serdyukov with Vasilyeva became opposition? what
    5. afdjhbn67
      afdjhbn67 19 October 2015 07: 16 New
      +1
      Quote: Mera Joota
      WHY PUTIN LOSES WAR AGAINST OFFICIALS?


      And I am amazed that you still have 100500 minuses, but hold on - Urya-Patriots are on the way. laughing Hold my plus hi
    6. satris
      satris 19 October 2015 07: 31 New
      -3
      Until their hands reach them. Remember the classics: "First you need to solve more general issues, and particular are a consequence of more general." Thus, solving a global problem, small ones solve themselves.
    7. Dejavu
      Dejavu 19 October 2015 07: 45 New
      +1
      That as in the evening after six people pulls to devour, and the bureaucrat in a hot place pulls to pull. Just as Putin is not able to follow so that you do not eat after six, he is not able to follow the thieving officials, TENS of THOUSAND! People do not change. If there is no conscience, it cannot be instilled by shooting. And having shot a thief in the civil service, where to get a thief not in his place? The only question is the conscience and decency of each official personally. I personally know some very decent officials in the Amur Region who are working hard for their country. Worthy. But there are very few of them. And here is how Putin can make people decent, I can’t even imagine the likely answer to this question. And who can, if the Lord God himself cannot do this, because he gave people freedom of choice and will?
      1. Kilo-11
        Kilo-11 19 October 2015 09: 23 New
        +4
        I disagree with you. JV Stalin was able to trace whether his party and economic apparatus was stealing or not stealing, and somehow the officials honestly worked in their overwhelming majority, and the point is not only that an official of any level could "put a seal in the back of the head", but also in the fact that the personnel work was done correctly and competently, and the people were not much different.
    8. skylare
      skylare 19 October 2015 09: 08 New
      +3
      Because our officials are like Lerna Hydra. How many do not chop it ... well, then everything is clear. In our city, for example, winter, as always, came unexpectedly.
    9. Kilo-11
      Kilo-11 19 October 2015 09: 33 New
      +2
      “Why is Putin losing the war against officials?” Is a very good question, because Mr. Putin is not waging any war with officials. There is no war and no result. Detention of individual officials is rather one-time actions, so to speak, they take the most odious or those officials , who, for one reason or another, found themselves outside the system of the built GDP. And then with whom to fight, if practically all ours or ours, and as you know, we do not surrender ours.
    10. 222222
      222222 19 October 2015 10: 41 New
      +1
      Why does Putin win the new cold war?
    11. Simon
      Simon 19 October 2015 11: 19 New
      0
      Everything has its time! yes
    12. larand
      larand 19 October 2015 12: 01 New
      +2
      Quote: Mera Joota

      I have a counter question:
      WHY PUTIN LOSES WAR AGAINST OFFICIALS?


      And what, the war against officials has been declared?
    13. Gomunkul
      Gomunkul 19 October 2015 13: 48 New
      0
      I have a counter question:
      WHY PUTIN LOSES WAR AGAINST OFFICIALS?
      Maybe because the government of D. Medvedev is not working well? wink laughing
    14. The comment was deleted.
  2. aszzz888
    aszzz888 19 October 2015 06: 00 New
    +8
    Why does Putin win the new cold war?


    Victory in this struggle has not yet been designated, but there are indications for it, and this is undoubted.
    God grant the health of the GDP, we must still rely on foreign policy, pull up those states, somehow; Pakistan, Turkey, Egypt, AOE, Iraq, Israel, then then there will undoubtedly be Victory. smile
    1. Andrew
      Andrew 19 October 2015 07: 08 New
      +3
      and the inside again in the paddock or at the mercy of not quite competent London prize winners? am
  3. Jarilo
    Jarilo 19 October 2015 06: 04 New
    +1
    There is also something here.
  4. Dynamic systems
    Dynamic systems 19 October 2015 06: 07 New
    +4
    For a confident victory, it is necessary to get rid of all kinds of "bark beetles" in Russia, which have settled in the top authorities and in the localities. For such "bark beetles" are the distributors of bribery, embezzlement and corruption.
    I wish the GDP good health and no sustained support for the peoples of Russia.
    Together - we are indestructible!
  5. Armored optimist
    Armored optimist 19 October 2015 06: 08 New
    10
    Putin is redoing the world. Not Russia, not Ukraine or the Middle East, but the whole world is moving to other rails.
    And he will cope with internal enemies too, give me time.
    1. Born in the USSR
      Born in the USSR 19 October 2015 06: 15 New
      +6
      This is a very stupid punishment and do not replicate it.
      Do not be like mattresses and do not stick your nose to other countries, deciding who to be on the map and who not.
      1. Armored optimist
        Armored optimist 19 October 2015 09: 56 New
        +1
        You probably like this one more?
        1. BMW
          BMW 19 October 2015 10: 11 New
          +3
          Quote: armored optimist
          You probably like this one more?

          This one is even worse. negative
    2. Vanya2013F
      Vanya2013F 19 October 2015 06: 15 New
      -1
      Sorry, inadvertently "-" put, I respect Putin. I wish him health and long life and finish what I started +++++. For that, in the overall rating "+" added. Google's phone edits him to the left.
    3. EvgNik
      EvgNik 19 October 2015 06: 30 New
      +3
      Quote: armored optimist
      And he will cope with internal enemies too, give me time

      You are too optimistic. Well, he is not imprisoned in the fight against internal enemies. At least amnesties for the privatizers say this, although the results of this large-scale theft must be reviewed a long time ago.
      1. Armored optimist
        Armored optimist 19 October 2015 06: 52 New
        0
        Laughing at yourself is good.
    4. BMW
      BMW 19 October 2015 09: 42 New
      +3
      Quote: armored optimist
      And he will cope with internal enemies too, give me time.

      I probably will not survive, well, figs with him, but I'm afraid that my children will not survive either. Why do you need such a ghostly preparation, so that later you can begin a ghostly struggle. And remove this card better, really stupid. hi
      1. The comment was deleted.
  6. BLOND
    BLOND 19 October 2015 06: 12 New
    +1
    If a statesman is mistaken, if he thinks poorly, takes erroneous measures, then the whole nation experiences the harmful effects of this. One must often ask oneself: is this a fair undertaking? Is it useful? First of all, a state person should keep in mind the following five subjects: 1. It is necessary to educate the nation that it should govern. 2. It is necessary to introduce good order in the state, to support society and force it to comply with laws. 3. It is necessary to establish a good and accurate police in the state. 4. It is necessary to promote the flourishing of the state and make it abundant. 5. It is necessary to create a state formidable in itself and inspiring respect for neighbors. Every citizen must be educated in a consciousness of duty to the Supreme Being, before himself, before society, and he needs to be taught some arts, without which he can hardly do in everyday life.
    Catherine the Great
    Source: http://www.wisdoms.ru/pavt/p89.html
  7. Sasha75
    Sasha75 19 October 2015 06: 12 New
    11
    And in general, we can also do something for our country, but how Ukrainians should give us help, and what you did for the country or you think that nothing depends on you for nothing.
    1. Tanker55
      Tanker55 19 October 2015 06: 50 New
      +1
      Wonderful drawing, thanks, really funny!
  8. EvgNik
    EvgNik 19 October 2015 06: 16 New
    +3
    Putin is an official himself, it’s not easy to win against himself. He understands foreign policy better - he was taught this. It’s easier to deal with an external enemy, everything is in sight. But it’s not so easy with an internal one, you need to break yourself and your environment. We don’t have many people who want prosperity for the people - they care more about their wallet.
    1. Jarilo
      Jarilo 19 October 2015 06: 24 New
      0
      Little but there
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. Mera joota
      Mera joota 19 October 2015 06: 34 New
      +3
      Quote: EvgNik
      But with the internal - not so simple

      In history, it was often not external factors that led to the death of the state, but internal ones.
    5. taram taramych
      taram taramych 19 October 2015 19: 49 New
      +1
      GDP is limited by the framework of the Law, but even having a "limited" set of tools, it continues a consistent social policy.
  9. populist
    populist 19 October 2015 06: 23 New
    +3
    Why does Putin win the new cold war?

    Don't say a gop until you jump over!
    No winnings are yet to be seen. Such a war can last for decades (45 years) with varying success or even with the advantage of one of the opponents (USSR) .And it will end in two or three years. How it ended in 1991.
    Yes, and why did they get the idea that Putin is waging a cold war? What are his intentions?
  10. Platonich
    Platonich 19 October 2015 06: 32 New
    +6
    You know, it’s like front-line soldiers, after the war those who came to the police said: at the front it was easier, here we are, here is the enemy! And here are the liberals - .. derasts: you will not immediately understand this .. out! Let's hope that their hour of separation from the State Feeding Party will come!
    1. radar1967
      radar1967 20 October 2015 04: 07 New
      0
      So he is.
      Our grandfathers developed qualities - courage, courage, sacrifice, a sense of responsibility.
      Our generation is developing qualities: patience, humility, lack of pride and desire to develop.

      What is characteristic: such a quality of the soul as the absence of pride cannot be gained from scratch. Pride should already be in the soul, so that there is something to fight. That is: grandfathers are proud and we are looking at them, but life teaches us to really look at things ...
  11. Yak28
    Yak28 19 October 2015 06: 34 New
    +4
    The Cold War did not stop, just with the collapse of the USSR, the United States gained a huge advantage, and Russia is still very far from winning. Where are the guarantees that an adequate president will come to power after Putin, and not a traitor like Yeltsin and Gorbachev.
  12. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 19 October 2015 06: 48 New
    +1
    I won’t write about winning the new Cold War - it’s really early to talk about it. But I liked it
    Russia has a habit of hitting its enemies

    The only thing is that the enemy doesn’t want to make friends and do not want to be friends with a story that makes them clear that it’s not worth fighting with Russia by any means.
  13. shinobi
    shinobi 19 October 2015 06: 52 New
    0
    The sensible prime minister needs to help the Darkest. To educate the receiver in this post.
  14. slizhov
    slizhov 19 October 2015 06: 58 New
    0
    It is difficult to disagree with something.
    That's just all this was understandable and 10-15 years ago.
    But no one invested anything in the development of the domestic economy of our country, thinking that $ 120 per barrel would last forever.
    Of course, better late than never.
    Of course, Yeltsin and Kozyrev, Gaidar, Chubais so ruined the Union, after which everything is easy and immediately not given.
    One thing is good - the revival of not only the power of our country, but also the love of citizens for their homeland ...
  15. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 19 October 2015 06: 59 New
    0
    The author is right that the former KGB officer Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, due to the specifics of the activities of the KGB itself (as well as his education and life experience), is much better versed in true the driving forces of world politics than the dubious altruist and pacifist Gorbachev and, especially, Yeltsin (I don’t even speak about Obama as a lawyer and social activist).

    It is Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin who adequately evaluates real causes and consequences unification of Germany, as well as all the circumstances that accompanied this. It is he who has real information about NATO's promises regarding its "nonproliferation to the east" and about the Euro-missile defense system.
  16. Seasoned 67
    Seasoned 67 19 October 2015 07: 14 New
    -1
    I fully agree with the speaker. Approved ...
    1. crumb
      crumb 19 October 2015 14: 29 New
      0
      Putin said, about the Russians, that they harnessed for a long time, but they drive very fast. Well, actually Bismarck said it, and Putin only quoted him
  17. satris
    satris 19 October 2015 07: 25 New
    +1
    Russian submarines may well protect Europe from the United States. And Europe will have to pay much less - transport costs are lower. smile
  18. AlexTires
    AlexTires 19 October 2015 09: 13 New
    -1
    Urgently publish the article in all Western media! It is possible with a note: "The opinion of the editorial board does not necessarily coincide with the opinion of the author of the article." Remove the phrase about the middle finger. There will be enough of them without it.
  19. cap
    cap 19 October 2015 09: 42 New
    -2
    One American ...
    1. Mera joota
      Mera joota 19 October 2015 11: 43 New
      +3
      Quote: cap
      One American ...

      I don’t know what they’re sniffing around Putin, but today's news killed:
      In August, Russia again increased its investment in US Treasury bonds (US Tresuries) by $ 7,8 billion. This is evidenced by updated data on the website of the US Treasury.
      Russia's total investment in the US public debt reached $ 89,9 billion.


      I ask the comrades of patriots to explain how so?
      1. afdjhbn67
        afdjhbn67 19 October 2015 12: 36 New
        0
        Quote: Mera Joota
        I ask the comrades of patriots to explain how so?


        Hesitated for a long time - whether I decided the patriot or not laughing but decided to answer in Jewish laughing - But what about the liberal idea in the economy over in Russia ?? Or did significant changes take place in the Kremlin and the government ??
      2. Cat man null
        Cat man null 19 October 2015 12: 37 New
        0
        Quote: Mera Joota
        I ask the comrades of patriots to explain how so?

        Not referring to myself as "patriots", I will try to explain (IMHO, of course):

        1. US Treasury bonds (US Tresuries) are profitable (albeit low-yield) and quite liquid security. That is, if "extra" bucks suddenly started up (and this happens when, for example, a certain amount is accumulated for subsequent calculations on the state debt) - these bucks are best invested in these treasuries.
        2. Look at the chart for 12.13, compare the amount of $ 89.9 (today, taking into account the additional $ 7.8) with 138.6 (then).
        3. Make your conclusion.
        1. BMW
          BMW 19 October 2015 13: 51 New
          +1
          Quote: Cat Man Null
          Draw your conclusion.

          Yes, easily.
          So much dough that we don’t know where to go, got the greens under her feet to get in the way and just crunched their nerves.
          Instead of building factories, ships, planes and spaceships plowing the vast expanses of the Bolshoi Theater, we are delegating these powers to the United States, because we don’t have this stuff, there’s nowhere to go. tongue
          1. afdjhbn67
            afdjhbn67 19 October 2015 14: 06 New
            0
            Quote: bmw
            Yes, easily.

            They are Mishan for a rainy day for the liberals ... God forbid what happens, will disappear as the notorious "party gold"
            1. BMW
              BMW 19 October 2015 14: 44 New
              +2
              Quote: afdjhbn67
              on a rainy day for liberals

              Ha, if they give us a kick, do you think that they will give it there? Yes, they will write such a pendol that our child’s slap will seem. No, they won’t shine there, only the fate of the pug on a leash. Even if they live on left-wing savings, that is, the Domocles sword of the new era, called the ice ax. wink
          2. Cat man null
            Cat man null 19 October 2015 15: 00 New
            0
            Quote: bmw
            So much dough that we don’t know where to go, got the greens under her feet to get in the way and just crunched their nerves

            Wrong answer. Than hysteria - take an interest in the amounts for servicing the external debt of the Russian Federation and the schedule for paying these amounts. For instance.

            This, by the way, is far from the only case when you may suddenly need a lot of live green money.

            Treasures are quite an advantageous tool in this regard. No conspiracy theories, purely economics.

            Quote: afdjhbn67
            They are Mishan for a rainy day for the liberals ... God forbid what happens, will disappear as the notorious "party gold"

            Following this logic, and looking at the dynamics of the stock of treasure in the Russian Federation, it should be recognized that from the beginning of 2014 to the present:
            - either in the Russian Federation it became 1.5 times less liberals
            - either the liberals' appetites fell 1.5 times

            There is a graph at the top, sapienti sat
            1. BMW
              BMW 20 October 2015 01: 59 New
              +1
              Quote: Cat Man Null
              foreign debt of the Russian Federation

              It seems that the GDP and DAM were reported that the external debts were almost completely repaid, why did they take them again? fellow
              Quote: Cat Man Null
              This, by the way, is far from the only case when you may suddenly need a lot of live green money.

              For example on a war game? soldier
              Quote: Cat Man Null
              Treasures are quite an advantageous tool in this regard. No conspiracy theories, purely economics.

              Yes, you are my friend’s monitor. Yes, and a lobbyist of related interests. repeat Who prevents to issue their own debt obligations for a loan of these bloodiest greens, and not for a loan in Western banks? No.
              Quote: Cat Man Null
              - either in the Russian Federation it became 1.5 times less liberals
              - either the liberals' appetites fell 1.5 times

              And this and that has increased, just can’t agree among themselves, to whom and how much. crying
              1. Cat man null
                Cat man null 20 October 2015 02: 12 New
                0
                Quote: bmw
                It seems that the GDP and DAM were reported that the external debts were almost completely repaid, why did they take them again?

                Quote: bmw
                Yes, you are my friend’s monitor. Yes, and a lobbyist of related interests.

                On both questions - one sentence: learn .. um .. subject. The external debt of the Russian Federation has been and remains. Only in 2000, it was $ 158,7 billion, and now $ 51.5 billion. Which, incidentally, is not much, by world standards yes

                A monitor is someone who is monitoring something, I guess. It's definitely not me laughing
                And what you wanted to call me is a monetarist, almost a liberal, campaign. And this, I assure you, is not me either request

                Quote: bmw
                For example on a war game?

                Yes easily .. or to patch some holes that suddenly arose .. as with the Ukrainian GTD, for example.

                Quote: bmw
                Who prevents to issue their own debt obligations for a loan of these bloodiest greens, and not for a loan in Western banks?

                These are different .. processes, sorry.

                - Russia already has bucks. They may need to be spent soon. Therefore, they are invested in the most liquid (that is, you can always sell, without much loss) and slightly profitable financial instrument. This strument is called treasure.
                - what you are talking about offers to issue certain securities, Russian, and to someone to put them in .. questions:

                - and what for (these dollars are already there and are already somewhere intended)?
                - where is the guarantee that you will be able to foist these papers at all, and even by a specific deadline?

                In general, etta .. learn a subject at your leisure (I’m not joking and I’m not kidding. Talking dumb with the deaf otherwise gets it).

                Quote: bmw
                And this and that increased, just can’t agree among themselves, to whom and how much

                I feel sorry for them, the poor .. so the "stash" -that decreased .. one and a half times .. this, in your opinion, good, bad, or not at all? wink
                1. BMW
                  BMW 20 October 2015 04: 37 New
                  0
                  Quote: Cat Man Null
                  The external debt of the Russian Federation has been and remains.

                  Yes, but at the same time more than 10 billion loans were made from 13 to 30 years, and this is in the most fat years. At the same time, the internal debt and the debt of entities slowly but surely grew.
                  Quote: Cat Man Null
                  monetarist, almost liberal, campaign

                  No, this is the one who, instead of investing income in production, offers to invest in profit from interest. Of course, why break your head, strain and sweat?
                  Quote: Cat Man Null
                  Yes, easily.

                  Of course, what to count money, because they are not personal.
                  Quote: Cat Man Null
                  or patching holes of some kind that suddenly arose .. as with Ukrainian GTD, for example

                  Suddenly wow, they knew perfectly well about the stalemate at the top, hoping it would blow over or resolve itself. Winter comes unexpectedly every year.
                  Quote: Cat Man Null
                  These are different .. processes, sorry.

                  I'm on the go, without thinking wrote, sorry.
                  Quote: Cat Man Null
                  and slightly profitable financial instrument

                  The most important phrase.
                  The question is, why not increase the capitalization of our banks under the same easy interest? Is it easier to cut back on social programs, science and various programs, having thrown them out of the budget?
                  The question is, we give money at a percentage, buying these pieces of paper (I exaggerate), knowing that this is a pyramid, where are the guarantees? Second, are we friends with the West or have we entered the confrontation? It turns out that we are financing the enemy. Where is the logic?
                  Quote: Cat Man Null
                  is this, in your opinion, good, bad, or not at all?

                  The question is posed incorrectly. There must be a question, why? I assure you that for every answer of the government, there will be the following question, why? The result of these many why is the stupor of the answerer (reporting). Why? There is no logical grain in their actions. More precisely there is, but one thing: gave at interest, so as not to bother with all kinds of industries there to live on them.
                  1. Cat man null
                    Cat man null 20 October 2015 19: 02 New
                    0
                    BMW, all bad ...

                    So .. I have Skype, in PM, on request - will be.

                    Here it is already necessary in a general voice .. we speak, in different languages, unfortunately .. about the same thing, by the way
                  2. Cat man null
                    Cat man null 20 October 2015 19: 59 New
                    0
                    Quote: bmw
                    The question is, why not increase the capitalization of our banks under the same easy interest? Is it easier to cut back on social programs, science and various programs, having thrown them out of the budget?
                    The question is, we give money at a percentage, buying these pieces of paper (I exaggerate), knowing that this is a pyramid, where are the guarantees? Second, are we friends with the West or have we entered the confrontation? It turns out that we are financing the enemy. Where is the logic?

                    You’re wonderful porridge in your head .. already delicious))

                    - the purchase of 80 lard in Treasuries has nothing to do with the capitalization of "our" banks. None. From the word "in general". Ready to justify))
                    - "we give money at interest, buying these pieces of paper (exaggerating), knowing that this is a pyramid, where guarantees" - guarantees - that the first of these "lenders" is China .. the second is Japan .. Russia is now in the second ten. . here is a graph from the 13th (beginning of the 14th) year, too lazy to look for newer ones, even from here everything is clear ..
  20. Old warrior
    Old warrior 19 October 2015 11: 59 New
    +2
    And who told you that if officials who were especially snickering were put up against the wall, they were put snickering less, then such actions would cause a split in society? Not a damn thing like that! This will be the very CONSOLIDATION of society that is necessary for the formation of our country GREAT. And do not be afraid to put on the posts those people who know how to lead (not steal), although they do not belong to this layer of bureaucracy.
    1. sa-ag
      sa-ag 19 October 2015 12: 08 New
      +1
      Quote: Old Warrior
      And who told you that if officials who were especially snickering were put up against the wall, they were put snickering less, then such actions would cause a split in society? Not a damn thing like that!

      It depends on which society to consider, if the one that was invited to the Kremlin in January in January, then it may well be, and the electorate society is considered on a residual basis, because now the authorities are turning their attention to those who have money
      1. Cat man null
        Cat man null 19 October 2015 12: 20 New
        +1
        Quote: sa-ag
        now the authorities are turning their attention to those who have money

        Quote: sa-ag
        society ... which in the amount of 40 people in January was invited to the Kremlin

        There is an opinion that that "society" was invited for the sole purpose of making the "society" (at least temporarily) moderate its appetites, and at the same time share the money (remember the dollar exchange rate "before the" meeting in the Kremlin and "after", compare the events wink
        1. BMW
          BMW 19 October 2015 13: 56 New
          0
          Quote: Cat Man Null
          match events

          Well, they took off on a three-ruble note, then what, when will we drop off on the second bottle? drinks
          1. Cat man null
            Cat man null 19 October 2015 14: 29 New
            0
            Quote: bmw
            Well, chipped on a treshka

            Nothing so-so "three-ruble note" - the buck was dropped by as much as 15 rubles .. belay

            Quote: bmw
            when will we drop on the second bottle?

            BMP (Without the slightest Concept). IMHO - when the Boss orders.

            PS: inspired by:

            Quote: Anecdote
            - Is it possible to sit bare back on a hedgehog?
            - It is possible in three cases: 1. If the hedgehog is shaved. 2. If the ass is a stranger, and 3. If the Motherland orders.

            Look ..
            1. BMW
              BMW 19 October 2015 15: 12 New
              0
              Quote: Cat Man Null
              Nothing so-so "treshka" - the buck was already dropped by 15 rubles.

              It is on the "three ruble note", if they chipped in on the "five", the dollar would not rise above half a dollar. Because the five are big barefoot, and the three are small. lol
              Seriously, we just agreed to slow down speculation on exchanges. How do you like this option? yes
              Quote: Cat Man Null
              when the Boss orders.

              Let me ask you, what is your status in the ranking card? And most importantly, in what time sheet? repeat
              Quote: Cat Man Null
              Anecdote

              Is that subtle army humor? I liked point 3, is it for disguise under the barbed wire when the whole company and in a row? Do not give a reason Svidomo, and then with such a disguise hedgehogs will not remain, they say that hunger. stop
              1. Cat man null
                Cat man null 19 October 2015 15: 19 New
                0
                Quote: bmw
                just agreed to slow down speculation on exchanges. How do you like this option?

                Sounds plausible .. only this is not all, there is a lot more that was done besides this "gathering in the Kremlin"

                Quote: bmw
                What is your status in the ranking card? And most importantly, in what time sheet?

                Quote: Song in the woods. Author: Yakov Akim
                .
                Which one there status the voice of a hedgehog
                Almost nothing
                .

                Such an observational status .. beyond all timesheets and ranks .. repeat

                Quote: bmw
                barbed wire

                Quote: Another Joke
                ... to get barbed wire you need cross the hedgehog with snake ..
                1. BMW
                  BMW 19 October 2015 16: 58 New
                  0
                  Quote: Cat Man Null
                  ... to get barbed wire, you need to cross the hedgehog with a snake

                  No snakes are needed for our situation, just hold hands. fellow
  21. Rostislav
    Rostislav 19 October 2015 12: 06 New
    -1
    I have a counter question:
    WHY PUTIN LOSES WAR AGAINST OFFICIALS?

    But because not all at once. And they started to press, remember the last arrests of the governors.
    Yes, there are still enough Chubais and nabiulins with silanes. But before asking irritably, "Why is Putin losing ..." just compare Russia today and Russia in 2005.
    Impressive? Me so yes.
    And it is unlikely that you would have done more in the place of Putin during this time.
    1. BMW
      BMW 19 October 2015 14: 08 New
      +2
      I recommend reading expert.ru/expert/2015/40/hoteli-posadok/
      By the way, Stalin for 15 years and managed to clean the country and rebuild. And this is after the war and the situation was abrupt than now.
    2. sa-ag
      sa-ag 19 October 2015 17: 32 New
      0
      Quote: Rostislav
      And they started to press, remember the last arrests of the governors.

      In my opinion, it’s such a peculiar plugging of holes in the budget, there wouldn’t be a hole and they wouldn’t remember these governors
  22. sv-georgij
    sv-georgij 19 October 2015 12: 40 New
    0
    Not immediately Moscow was built. Recall our dashing 90s. We made it possible to ruin the USSR with our own hands, and as you know, it is always easier to collapse than to build it and now we have what we have. In addition, a bureaucratic apparatus or management system was formed. They possess not only a certain political power, but also have finances as a result of privatization, and therefore it is not so easy to neutralize their influence. Yes, and they have connections with the west. Recall our oligarchs Berezovsky, Gusinsky, Khodorkovsky and others.
  23. ermolai
    ermolai 19 October 2015 15: 07 New
    +1
    Quote: Mera Joota
    WHY PUTIN LOSES WAR AGAINST OFFICIALS?

    and who won it? Joseph Vissarionovich, by and large, was not able to defeat them either, and swagger and rudeness flourished, although they traveled to Kolyma to master echelons.
  24. BARKHAN
    BARKHAN 19 October 2015 18: 27 New
    +4
    You can certainly blame everything on negligent boyars. And yet the head of state is responsible for EVERYTHING! Since I took up this work, Pasha. The failure or unwillingness to put things in order in the immediate circle rest entirely on his shoulders and conscience. The complete failure of the Cabinet, Putin's fault. The economy is in the ruins of his fault. He appointed and holds Medvedev. He repelled Serdyukov. Thanks to his negligence, Vasiliev was released and Chubais is not sitting. Thanks to him, the oligarchs still reign and steal. If the guard shoots his colleagues, the commander he’s responsible, he’s already responsible enough. He’s already ruled over, and there was a lot of money. How much could you set up free housing for young families for the money spent on the Olympics and Eurovision. Here is the investment in the future. Here is the population growth. From victories - CRIMEA, from defeats - payment of counter-claims to Ichkeria, destruction of professional workers as a class, bureaucratic inflated to indecentness, pushing kicks of New Russia back into the banderostan. Maybe I am mistaken in something, but this is how I see it.
  25. GraveBezKresta
    GraveBezKresta 19 October 2015 18: 40 New
    -2
    But the opinion of Strelkova. About victories and defeats.
    "Novorossiya never existed, and there is no - the project is closed. So what if thousands of people died, hundreds of thousands became refugees," Strelkov said.

    According to him, the east of Ukraine is not needed by Russia, since it will not feed 4,5 million inhabitants of Donbass.

    "Now we need to create an informational background, divert attention, inflate a bubble ... They are generally not clear who. They are not Russians, not Crimeans and not even Crimean Tatars. But Syria is like this: Arabs, Sunnis, Alawites, Druze, Arabs -Christians - they urgently need protection, "- said Strelkov."
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. GraveBezKresta
        GraveBezKresta 19 October 2015 19: 16 New
        0
        And what is incomprehensible? Everything is chewed. Even you have to understand. And where is the movie about China? Some woman from the planet Nibiru? You, dear, have sat on the Internet. laughing
        But in principle, if you disagree with something, write to Strelkov. I think that he understands in these matters more than you and I.
        1. Cat man null
          Cat man null 19 October 2015 19: 35 New
          +1
          Quote: Grave without Cross
          And where is the movie about China?

          You posted it the other day .. stupid, by the way, a video, which is not strange, because the author -

          http://lada-rus.ru/video

          - a certain Lada Rus, she is Svetlana Peunova, in a decent society it is somehow not accepted to mention her. "Baba with Nibiru" - this was exactly what she referred to, look for a causal relationship yourself (it is not difficult and kneads your brain).

          Quote: Grave without Cross
          But in principle, if you disagree with something, write to Strelkov

          What for? For me personally, Strelkov, as an analyst and a source of information, is even less than no one. Remind me at least one of his predictions that came true?

          I don’t remember something like that No.
    2. Cat man null
      Cat man null 19 October 2015 19: 23 New
      +1
      Quote: Grave without Cross
      But the opinion of Strelkova. About victories and defeats

      So what? This is like the video about China, from "a woman from the planet Nibiru", or what?

      Shooters just feels that they forgot about him, and uses any reason to appear on the screen. He’s an analyst — he doesn’t have, and cannot have, real information about ongoing processes.

      Well, purely remind yourself .. and that's it yes

      PS: The screensaver from the movie about China was bashfully removed .. it’s too painful the author is an odious girl .. and so - yes here it looks:
      1. GraveBezKresta
        GraveBezKresta 19 October 2015 19: 39 New
        -1
        Eck you smeared Strelkov, well, of course, where is he up to you! And up to your cat on Ave. Surkov propaganda in action. Previously, everyone was shouting "Shooters is a Russian hero", but now it cost Surkov and company to spend several hundred million dollars on propaganda and this is the result. Cat Man Null knows everything, understands everything, can do everything. And he can even write about it. And Strelkov is so, boy ...
        1. Cat man null
          Cat man null 19 October 2015 19: 52 New
          +1
          Quote: Grave without Cross
          Ek You Strelkova smeared something

          I did not "smear" anyone

          Quote: Grave without Cross
          where is he up to you! And to your cat on av

          The cat and I are doing our job and are not trying to get into politics. Unlike..

          Quote: Grave without Cross
          And Shooters like that, boy ...

          I repeat: give an example of the forecast made by Strelkov, which (forecast) came true ..

          Here, after all, how: cargo analyte - climb into the body forecast correctly. At least occasionally.

          I don’t remember for Strelkov a single forecast that came true. Correct, if I am mistaken.

          Everything else, with the mention of cats and relatives of the deceased is blah blah blah, is ignored.
          1. GraveBezKresta
            GraveBezKresta 19 October 2015 20: 04 New
            -1
            Quote: Cat Man Null
            He’s an analyst — he doesn’t have, and cannot have, real information about ongoing processes.

            Quote: Cat Man Null
            I did not "smear" anyone

            Sorry, but what did you do? Not smeared, so smeared?
            Quote: Cat Man Null
            The cat and I are doing our job and are not trying to get into politics.

            ????? What do you write with the cat in paws? Is this not politics and propaganda?
            Quote: Cat Man Null
            I don’t remember for Strelkov a single forecast that came true. Correct, if I am mistaken.

            Strelkov states that the Novorossiya project has been merged. New Russia was supposed to be on a much larger scale than now, the so-called republics. That way it is 15-20 times more on the territory. Least. Didn't Strelkov's prediction come true?
            1. Cat man null
              Cat man null 19 October 2015 20: 19 New
              0
              Quote: Grave without Cross
              New Russia should have been on a much larger scale than now, the so-called republics. That way 15-20 more in the territory. Least

              That is what Strelkov thinks. You apparently think so too.

              Quote: Grave without Cross
              Did not Strelkov's forecast come true?

              What, excuse me, is the forecast? Some dreams of "Big Novorossiya"? So these are dreams, not a forecast ..

              Nothing, try again ..

              Quote: Grave without Cross
              Sorry, but what did you do? Not smeared, so smeared?

              I expressed my personal opinion. I’m not imposing it on anyone, by the way.

              Quote: Grave without Cross
              What do you write with the cat in paws? Is this not politics and propaganda?

              No, oddly enough. At least not on the scale that Strelkov is trying to do.
            2. GraveBezKresta
              GraveBezKresta 19 October 2015 20: 23 New
              -1
              About the movie about China and the woman. The problem is not in the video, the problem is:
              1) Kitayoz really climb like cockroaches into our territory, Vova and Dima welcome this;
              2) How then to drive them out of there? Will you sweep them with your broom along with your cat ?;
              3) China openly writes about the attack on Russia. Go to their China forums and you will be happy;
              4) Unlike you, I served on the Chinese border and imagine what the Chinese army means. I assure you that with such an ally, we no longer need enemies. These are insidious, merciless, cruel Asians. They will not regret Russian, as well as Buryats, Evenks, Yakuts, etc .;
              1. Cat man null
                Cat man null 19 October 2015 20: 36 New
                0
                Quote: Grave without Cross
                About the movie about China and the woman. The problem is not in the video

                - a woman - a typical sectarian. Any objections?
                - the video was produced by a woman (this is an "author's project")
                - further - there is no information from this video of faith. From the word "none"

                Chinas - yes, there is such a problem. But this problem has always been, it was also with the Union. And these maps, where they draw Siberia with their territory, were still there.

                So, I think, the one who is supposed to have already counted everything repeatedly.

                In any case, such horroroff, as in the same video:

                - repeal of laws of the Russian Federation
                - transfer of control over the border of the Russian Federation to the Chinas
                - Forced disposition of property from citizens of the Russian Federation in favor of the Chinese
                - ...

                I, having carefully read the law, did not see there. And it cannot be there. Incidentally, we crossed paths on this subject - you didn’t really say anything then. Precisely because there is nothing to say. You do not own the subject, but in the Law there is no confirmation of yours (read - women from Nibiru). Dot.

                And how to "sweep it away" - they will find it later, don't worry like that ..

                In general, as in that joke:

                - And you do not scratch him .. he will not bother

                Something like this..
                1. GraveBezKresta
                  GraveBezKresta 19 October 2015 20: 57 New
                  -3
                  I answer only because of respect for your cat. The fact that you did not see anything in the law does not mean that renting the chinas in our land and territory is not dangerous for Russia. In fact, it is a direct national betrayal. Regarding the Soviet Union and its attitude towards the Chinese, you lie:
                  1) In a terrible dream in the Soviet Union, the sale of modern Russian weapons to the Chinese would not have been dreamed of. For it was a bullet in the forehead.
                  2) The Chinese were considered as the first potential enemy of the USSR.
                  3) Now the oligarchy rules us - from here everything follows.
                  4) Okay, go feed your cat. Nothing changes from our bickering. It's just a shame for the power.
                  1. Cat man null
                    Cat man null 19 October 2015 21: 10 New
                    +1
                    Quote: Grave without Cross
                    1) In a terrible dream in the Soviet Union, the sale of modern Russian weapons to the Chinese would not have been dreamed of. For it was a bullet in the forehead

                    Well ... until the middle (or even until the end) of the 50s - quite a bit .. even did not sell, but passed.. "bezvozbeddo, that is, dadom" (c) Owl

                    Quote: Grave without Cross
                    2) The Chinese were considered as the first potential enemy of the USSR

                    Not true. The first have always been the United States with NATO

                    Quote: Grave without Cross
                    3) .. 4) ..

                    Uninformatively negative

                    You, dear, if you are already embarking on arguing, so prepare the tools a little bit .. otherwise the law is not a law for you, but there’s some kind of movie, it’s not clear from what place it’s pulled out, it’s the standard of truth ..

                    It's all stupid somehow, call me ..
                  2. Vais
                    Vais 24 October 2015 06: 17 New
                    0
                    [quote = GraveWithout Cross]
                    1) In a terrible dream in the Soviet Union, the sale of modern Russian weapons to the Chinese would not have been dreamed of. For it was a bullet in the forehead.
                    2) The Chinese were considered as the first potential enemy of the USSR.
                    [Quote]
                    Back to school? You're lying again! )))
                    The Soviet Union before the bald maize and co. They condemned Stalin and quarreled us with China, not only massively supplied the latest weapons, but also granted patents for their production in China for free. This was done under Stalin, and he knew exactly who, for which a bullet in the forehead.
                    The Chinese were never seen as the first potential enemy of the USSR. Correct me, but the most powerful army group, armed with the most modern weapons and equipped with the best soldiers, was not located in the Far East.
  26. robbihood
    robbihood 19 October 2015 19: 13 New
    0
    The era turned back to us,
    Absolutely ignoring us:
    We never lived so bad
    As with Michael Boom and Obama. *.
    You do not forget that this Obama still dear to the Russians does a lot of all sorts of tricks:
    freezes pensions
    raises prices
    withdraws money for overhaul,
    solder with vodka
    destroys education and health,
    spawns Russian billionaires
    steals everything that lies bad (which lies well - also steals),
    and, finally, even with no American president, dear Russians did not live so badly as they did under Obama!
    Here! Shame on Obama!
    Don't be angry with the jokes, allies. It's just a shame for you, and for us too.
  27. eternalmotor
    eternalmotor 19 October 2015 19: 22 New
    0
    If history teaches us anything, it is that Russia has a habit of hitting its enemies. After Napoleon and Hitler, this may be the turn of the Americans; one must understand the danger of persecuting a Russian bear.


    The key phrase of the whole, in fact, article! Answers to all burning questions!
  28. iouris
    iouris 19 October 2015 20: 07 New
    0
    There is no "cold war", there is a "big game", i.e. game for a long time. Each side has too different resources. Winning one war does not mean complete victory has been achieved. If victory is possible at all. The problem is that the "golden billion" consumes too many resources. The question is: is it possible to reduce the "golden billion" to 100..50 million, or all the rest should self-destruct in order to maintain a high standard of living of the population, primarily in the United States.
  29. boris117
    boris117 19 October 2015 20: 34 New
    0
    Quote: EvgNik
    .Not so many people here who want prosperity for the people - they care more about their wallet.

    It does not work out so far for Putin inside the country. Foreign policy is on, but domestic is marking time. But only the inside gives strength, arms the army, creates weapons, and supports morally. In parallel, these two aspects of activity should go and support each other. Foreign policy needs reliable rear in the form of domestic policy.
  30. Sergey242
    Sergey242 20 October 2015 01: 37 New
    0
    Do not believe those who say that quitting smoking in a week is impossible. There is a special and really working technique that will save you from this addiction in a few days, here dmitrinosov.blogspot.ru link I myself could not quit for a very long time, but this time it really turned out.
  31. radar1967
    radar1967 20 October 2015 03: 41 New
    -1
    Why does Putin win the new cold war?

    Because you need to know the laws of the Universe. If on fingers, then:
    1. If the world is unipolar (the USA CAN DO IT IN 2 DAYS. For example: to give nuclear weapons to Ukraine and from its territory to rattle across Central Russia) - However, not the military and bankers rule in the USA. Those who rule know that in a unipolar world the meaning of the existence of planet Earth as an universal simulator of struggle is lost: (Good VS Evil)
    2. When World Civilization became unipolar, it ceased to exist. (e.g. Atlantis)
    3. The curators of planet Earth, like us, once needed a negative experience. Many allowed. Studied. They watched. However, they (Ashtar and others) made certain conclusions and will no longer let things go on their own, will not allow to ruin Civilization. However, if, nevertheless, Russia surrenders its position - then they will punish everyone without exception. WET ON THE MOST WOMAN.
    (Evidence of previous "unipolar" worlds, that is, the sinking of continents - thousands and thousands ...)
    Those who advocate world hegemony need to learn to fly very high or swim very fast ...
  32. The comment was deleted.
  33. Prisoner
    Prisoner 20 October 2015 19: 49 New
    0
    Why, why? Because the truth is behind him, EPRST !!!
  34. Denis Skiff
    Denis Skiff 21 October 2015 12: 33 New
    0
    Quote: Mera Joota

    I have a counter question:
    WHY PUTIN LOSES WAR AGAINST OFFICIALS?
    They do not hold cynicism.