The activity of the Nobel Committee is not only unfair, but also dangerous, because the Masonic Committee not only takes an active part in forming a false elite from the mafia-Jewish clan, but deliberately plunges world science into a state of crisis ...
Useful to remember history the emergence of "the most prestigious award in the world." The personality of its ancestor Swede Alfred Nobel exhaustively characterizes the line of the poem by V. G. Boyarinov: “It was he who made a dynamite from a business on earth ...”. A. Nobel - the third son of Emmanuel Nobel was born in the 1833 year. His father moved to St. Petersburg in 1842, where he began developing torpedoes. In 1859, the second son, Ludwig Nobel, began to do this. Alfred, forced to return to Sweden with his father after the bankruptcy of a family business, devoted himself to the study of explosives, especially the safe production and use of nitroglycerin. Thus, the whole family of Nobels produced weapons.
In 1862, the first successful test of the substance was carried out - the future of dynamite or “Nobel's safe explosive powder”; a patent application was filed. In Sweden, A. Nobel opened the Nitroglycerin plant, which became the basis of his own industrial group for the production of explosives, then a whole network of factories in Europe was created.
There were several explosions at the plants belonging to the Nobel family, one of which in the 1864 year killed Alfred Nobel's younger brother Emil and several other workers.
From the production of dynamite, other explosives and the development of the oil fields of Baku (Partnership "Nobel Brothers"), in which Alfred and his brothers Ludwig and Robert played a significant role, Alfred Nobel has accumulated a significant state.
In 1880, a public clash took place between D. I. Mendeleev and Ludwig Nobel, the owner of a mechanical plant in St. Petersburg and the head of the oil company, “Br. Nobel "" (brother of Alfred Nobel, who was also a shareholder of the "Partnership") - the largest producer of kerosene in Russia. In this production, gasoline and heavy residues were considered useless waste and destroyed. And DI Mendeleev proposed to convert these waste residues into oils that are three to four times more expensive than kerosene. This struck the Nobel oil empire, as their Russian competitors could successfully compete with them.
Many years later, M. Gorky, who visited the Nobel plant, wrote: “The oil fields remained in my memory as my brilliantly made picture of a dark hell ...”, and Russian industrialist V. I. Rogozin, referring to the situation in the fields, noted that everything happened “without an account and calculation.
V.I. Rogozin supported D.I. Mendeleev in discussions with L.Nobel and, in accordance with the recommendations of the scientist, he began to process oil on the Volga-built plant, receiving from it, apart from kerosene, good quality lubricants. The controversy took place at a time when L. Nobel played a significant role in appointing Baku mayors, which naturally made it difficult for advanced Russian industrialists.
The last years of A. Nobel’s life were marked by a number of scandals: while organizing the market for smokeless powder A. Nobel sold his patent to Italy, for which the French government accused him of theft, his laboratory was closed. Then there was a scandal in connection with his participation in speculation in an unsuccessful attempt to lay the Panama Canal. Contemporaries called A. Nobel in the press "millionaire on blood", "explosive death merchant", "dynamite king".
In the 1888 year (eight years before the actual demise), in one of the French newspapers, an erroneous publication of A. Nobel's obituary (the newspapermen confused Alfred with his elder brother Ludwig, April 12 deceased) appeared with a censure of the invention of dynamite. It is believed that this event prompted A. Nobel to the decision to establish a prize, so as not to remain in the memory of mankind as a "villain of a world scale."
In November, 1895 in Paris, A. Nobel signed a will, according to which most of his fortune was to go to the Nobel Prize Foundation, which amounted to 31 million crowns. In his testament A. Nobel stated his will in this way: to give a premium to those who brought the greatest benefit to mankind as a percentage of his capital. Awards were to be awarded in five areas: medicine, physics, chemistry, literature and peacemaking.
Few people know that there was also a special prize for Alfred’s brother Ludwig Nobel for Russia, since he lived 56 years from 66 years in Russia. In 1889, the Russian Technical Society and the Oil Production Partnership Br. Nobel "" established a gold medal and the award named "Ludwig Emanuel Nobel." From this time on to 1917, the gold medal and award were awarded every five years for research and development in the field of science and technology.
At the end of March, 2007, in St. Petersburg, was awarded the revived Ludwig Nobel Prize. The first winners were poet E. Yevtushenko, writer C. Aitmatov, pilot-cosmonaut A. Leonov, grandmaster A. Karpov, choreographer V. Vasilyev, head of the Rehabilitation Center V. Dikul, head of the investment and construction department of OAO Gazprom J. Golko, Vice-President of UNESCO SPASUM St. Petersburg V. Skvirsky (Industrial and Construction Review ”, No. 100, April, 2007).
Thus, if before the revolution the Ludwig Nobel Prize was awarded for scientific and technical achievements, now the category of award winners has expanded in such a way that it is awarded for general services to the democratic regime. That is why the list of award winners is so strange, among which there is not a single scientist. The presentation of the award turned into a kind of democratic party of the “creative” intelligentsia.
And the work of the Committee for the award of the well-known Alfred Nobel Prize is also full of injustice. Although the capital underlying the future Nobel Prize was paid for with Russian oil and the labor of Russian workers, engineers, scientists, Russian became laureates in the rarest cases.
The absence among the Nobel laureates of DI Mendeleev, the ingenious creator of the Periodic Law, is the most disgraceful fact in the history of the committee and the clearest characteristic of its activities: when awarding the prize the scientific achievements of the applicant are not decisive. Doctor of Geological Sciences A.M. Blokh in the article “Nobelian” by Dmitri Mendeleev (Priroda, No. 2, 2002) writes that Dmitry Ivanovich thrice (1905, 1906, 1907) was nominated for the Nobel Prize, but the prize was not awarded to him under the pretext that the discovery was made by him long ago. And the entire world scientific community, as if imitating the Nobel Committee, seeks to hide the merits of Russian scientists: in all countries of the world, the Periodic Mendeleev Law is usually published abroad without mentioning the name of its author.
The role of Russian and Soviet scientists for the entire period of the existence of the Nobel Prizes was deliberately minimized and silenced by the "world scientific community." The Russophobia of the Nobel Committee also manifested itself in the award of the 2009 prizes of the year: the teams of laureates in biology and chemistry “forgot” to include Russian scientists - the authors of the ideas being developed.
As of 2009, only 19 citizens of Russia and the USSR received 15 Nobel Prizes - significantly less than representatives of the USA (304), Great Britain (114), Germany (100) or France (54).
Note that A. V. Abrikosov at the time of the award was a US citizen.
The award of the Nobel Prize to immigrants from Russia was and is of a purely political, anti-Russian or anti-Soviet nature. The prize was awarded to the destroyer of the Great Power of the USSR M. Gorbachev, who is now favored by his Western friends in every way - in the West he is treated and fed, giving lectures, the theme of which should sound like this: "How I destroyed the Soviet Union." And B. Pasternak received a prize not for his good poems, but for the mediocre, sharply anti-Soviet novel Doctor Zhivago.
Another example from the field of literature. So writes the "poet" Joseph Brodsky - about his former homeland - Russia:
This is a kind of fatherland, engraving.
On the bed - Soldier and Dura.
The old woman is scratching her dead side.
This kind of fatherland, splint.
The dog barks, the wind carries.
Boris asks for Gleb in the face.
Whirling couples at the ball.
In the hallway - a bunch on the floor.
Such a “correct” attitude towards Russia could not be ignored by the Nobel Committee - I. Brodsky was awarded the title of laureate. Undoubtedly, an important role was played by the fact that I. Brodsky emigrated and did not have Russian citizenship by the time he was awarded the prize.
The great Russian writers L. Tolstoy and A. Chekhov were not honored to receive an award, but although talented, but far behind them I. Bunin was noted by the Nobel committee - perhaps because he emigrated from Russia. As V.F. Ivanov noted in the book “The Russian intelligentsia and Freemasonry. From Peter the Great to the present day ”:“ Many Russian writers belong to the Freemasons and are dependent on the Masonic order ”. Calling a number of names of writers belonging to Freemasonry, he believes that this includes "in all likelihood, Bunin, who with the assistance of Freemasons received the Nobel Prize, which, as a general rule, is given only to Freemasons."
A striking example of the literary preferences of the Nobel Committee is the award of a prize in literature in the 2004 year to the Austrian writer E. Jelinek, who suffers from a hereditary mental disorder. Her work, according to critics - a mixture of pornography and sadism. We emphasize these words - "according to critics," because the general public is marked by a high award of the work, as a rule, does not read.
The award 2009 was awarded to German writer G. Muller, the author of the books: “Hot potato is a warm bed”, “Woman lives in a bundle of hair”, “Outside look, or Life is a fart in a lantern”. Apparently, the Nobel Prize in the field of literature should be renamed as follows: "For merits in the matter of debilization of the population."
Even L. Radzikhovsky (“The Nobel tip of the iceberg”) is naturally forced to remark very gently: “The grinding of scientists and writers (and even, oddly enough, politicians) compared to the first half of the twentieth century is an undoubted fact.”
Economic considerations are often cited to the question “Why the Russians are not given a Nobel?” Because the fund is formed as annual interest on the main Nobel capital located in financial institutions, mainly American, the Nobel Committee cannot ignore this. No wonder the number of American laureates is much larger than that of non-Americans. We continue this thought by asking the question: in whose hands is American money? It is not a secret to anyone that the financial institutions of the United States are in the hands of the Jews, therefore, the percentage of Jews among American and not only American, Nobel laureates is so large.
S.A. Fridman writes about this in the book “Jews are Nobel Prize Laureates” (M., 2000). By the way, in the book of S. Friedman it is indicated that the alternate D. I. Mendeleev in 1906 in the list of winners Ferdinand Frederick Henri Moissan was a Jew. He made a very private discovery - highlighted free fluorine.
Here are the data on the national composition of the laureates, taken from the article by L. Radzikhovsky “The Swedish Simhas Torah” (the Jewish Word newspaper No. 41 (214), 2004 g). As noted in the article from all living 220 winners: 82 Jew, 62 - Anglo-American, 15 Germans, 11 English, 6 Chinese, etc.
Here is another abbreviated quotation: “As is known, the Nobel Prizes are awarded from 1901 (in economics - from 1969). So, of the total number of laureates, Jews are: in physics - 26% (among American laureates - 38%), in chemistry - 19%, (among American laureates - 28%), in medicine and physiology - 29% (among American laureates - 42%), in economics 38% (among American laureates - 53%) ”.
L. Radzikhovsky enthusiastically calculates: "This amazing result becomes just crazy when it comes to" per capita "." Noticing that "Jews with their 26% in the twentieth century made up about 0,5 – 0,26% of the population of the Earth." Total: their ““ Nobel density ”- 1 laureate for 100 thousand people!” For Anglo-Saxons and Germans, according to L. Radzikhovsky’s calculations, this density was 1 laureate for 1 million.
And the article begins with the words: “So, this year the Swedes have surpassed themselves: from 12 Nobel laureates, seven are Jews! If we take only science - 6 from 10 ... One would think that the Swedes thus celebrated the Torah holiday ... ”We explain:“ Simhas Torah ”-“ Torah Holiday ”is a Jewish holiday dedicated to the completion of Torah reading in synagogues, which coincided with 2004. year with the date of the award of the Nobel Prizes.
Based on this statistics, the author concludes: “Jews, the“ people of the Book, ”who have studied the Talmud for thousands of years, are of course ideally adapted to intellectual activity. Therefore, they are willing to go into science, among them the percentage of scientists (including Nobel laureates) is much higher than among most European nations. ” Note that this statistic gives out L. Radzikhov’s extreme concern with the national question and clearly indicates that this question is also important for the Nobel Committee.
And here’s how the award of the Nobel Prize to A. Einstein, the famous plagiarist V. Bobrov (“For his affairs”, “Duel” No. 43, 1998) explains: “... active pushing Einstein into the Nobel laureates and his immense praise as the supposedly greatest genius of all nations and times - all this is a kind of curtsey ... for participating physics in the Zionist movement for many decades. "
A typical example of the selection of candidates for the Nobel Prize was given to L. Landau: “Such a noble prize, which should be honored by prominent minds of the planet, should be given to one Cherenkov club unjustly (reference - Pavel Andreevich Cherenkov discovered a new effect that got his name). He worked in the laboratory of Frank-Kamenetsky in Leningrad. His boss is the legal co-author. Their institute consulted the Muscovite I. Ye. Tamm. It simply needs to be added to the two legitimate candidates ”(cited from the book by Kora Landau-Drobantseva“ Akademik Landau ”).
The traditional activity of the Nobel Committee is the distribution of money and fame to its people. Thus, the award for environmental activities was awarded to a member of the US Jewish community, former US Vice President A. Gore, whose contribution to the cause of nature conservation was limited to shooting a mediocre film.
The pinnacle of the Nobel Committee's cynicism is the award of the 2008 Peace Prize to the former President of Finland M. Ahtisaari, who is the author of the project to create an independent Kosovo, that is, tearing away its ancestral lands from Serbia. Rewarding a person for gross violation of international law is a mockery of humanistic moral standards, over civilized norms of the life of the human community.
The motives for the public were the motives for awarding the Nobel Peace Prize to the president of the most belligerent state in the world - the United States Barack Obama. The formulation of his merits by the Nobel Committee is shocking: "For extraordinary efforts in strengthening international diplomacy and cooperation between nations." B. Obama became a laureate just nine months after taking office, and was nominated much earlier, that is, he simply did not have time to apply “extraordinary efforts”. This insolent mockery of public opinion, characteristic of the dominant financial system in the world, clearly shows who is the owner of the Nobel Committee and determines its policy.
The words "Nobel laureate" for people who understand the situation, no longer sound proud. Often, prizes are awarded for insignificant and simply dubious research, the Nobel laureates appointed by the “great” become heroes of incidents. So. J. Stiglitz, winner of the prize in economics, using mathematical formulas, argued that the global economic crisis that the world is experiencing today is impossible in principle. Let us cite the words of another Nobel laureate - A. Einstein: “There is not the slightest chance that nuclear energy can ever be used. To do this, it took the atoms to disintegrate according to our will ... ”(1932) This was said just thirteen years before the explosion of the first atomic bomb.
As the doctor of technical sciences FF Mende writes in the article “Are Nobel Prize Winners Wrong?”, The award is provided by “groups called scientific schools, in large part they consist of mediocre people, careerists and businessmen, who have no scientific value. The goals that they pursue are the seizure of a dominant position in a given branch of knowledge with the aim of access to material resources. Their tasks also include the fight against dissent, the maximum preservation of the existing state of affairs in science and the suppression of any new ideas that may damage their dominant position. ”
“A typical example is the grouping ... of Academician VL Ginzburg ... It controls all the main scientific publications on physics in Russia ... In the struggle for power and money, groups of this type resort to the most degrading methods ..."
Dr. A. Rukhadze, Doctor of Physics and Mathematics, spoke about the personal qualities of the late Nobel laureate V. Ginzburg (“Events and people, 1948 – 1991 years”, M., 2001): “What didn’t I like in V. Ginzburg? First of all, its national orientation. He once said that “with other things being equal, he will, of course, take a Jew to himself” ... ”
Although the criticism of the Nobel Committee is constantly growing, the reputation of the Nobel Prize as the most honorable in the world is carefully guarded both by “scientific” clans and by the biased media. And the highest scientific administration, keenly tracking the “general line”, worships the “Nobel Prize”. Academician N. Dobretsov demonstrates an anecdotal example of loyalism in the article “Medicine for the RAS” (“Rossiyskaya Gazeta”, dated 18 in May 2007) - arguing about the activities of the Novosibirsk Academgorodok, he writes: Alexander V. Kantorovich, a mathematician and economist. But, according to the most diverse experts, there should be at least six of them. ” What kind of "experts", according to what formulas did this mysterious number six be calculated?
For thinking people, the words “Nobel laureate” do not sound proud at all, for the Nobel laureate means only to belong to a certain mafia-nationalist clan, no more.
Here is another quotation from the article by F. F. Mende: “The award of the Nobel Prize translates the scientist into the category of revered, deified and untouchables. This process of canonization even overtook the church in life, where it was canonized only after death. Can we assume that the existence of such a phenomenon in science, as the award of the Nobel Prizes, brings her benefit? I think that many will agree that the process itself is far from objectivity and justice. ”
The activity of the Nobel Committee is not only unfair, but also dangerous, because the committee takes an active part in the formation of not just false elites, who, hiding behind the high title of laureate of the “most prestigious award”, occupy high places in the leadership of science, economics and politics.
The omnipotence of the Nobel clan led to the fact that world science was plunged into a state of crisis, which is manifested in a decrease in the level and effectiveness of scientific research, which often rolls by inertia, not reacting to the rapidly changing situation in the world, without solving the urgent, vital tasks of humanity.
Under these conditions, science has ceased to fulfill its main function - to provide humanity with true knowledge of the surrounding world.
The absolute power of the Nobel clan in world science is stifling really talented scientists. Under these conditions, who will save humanity from an economic collapse, from an impending ecological catastrophe?