Military Review

Nobel Prize - the tool of masons, Russophobes and parasites

56



The activity of the Nobel Committee is not only unfair, but also dangerous, because the Masonic Committee not only takes an active part in forming a false elite from the mafia-Jewish clan, but deliberately plunges world science into a state of crisis ...

Useful to remember history the emergence of "the most prestigious award in the world." The personality of its ancestor Swede Alfred Nobel exhaustively characterizes the line of the poem by V. G. Boyarinov: “It was he who made a dynamite from a business on earth ...”. A. Nobel - the third son of Emmanuel Nobel was born in the 1833 year. His father moved to St. Petersburg in 1842, where he began developing torpedoes. In 1859, the second son, Ludwig Nobel, began to do this. Alfred, forced to return to Sweden with his father after the bankruptcy of a family business, devoted himself to the study of explosives, especially the safe production and use of nitroglycerin. Thus, the whole family of Nobels produced weapons.

In 1862, the first successful test of the substance was carried out - the future of dynamite or “Nobel's safe explosive powder”; a patent application was filed. In Sweden, A. Nobel opened the Nitroglycerin plant, which became the basis of his own industrial group for the production of explosives, then a whole network of factories in Europe was created.

There were several explosions at the plants belonging to the Nobel family, one of which in the 1864 year killed Alfred Nobel's younger brother Emil and several other workers.

From the production of dynamite, other explosives and the development of the oil fields of Baku (Partnership "Nobel Brothers"), in which Alfred and his brothers Ludwig and Robert played a significant role, Alfred Nobel has accumulated a significant state.

In 1880, a public clash took place between D. I. Mendeleev and Ludwig Nobel, the owner of a mechanical plant in St. Petersburg and the head of the oil company, “Br. Nobel "" (brother of Alfred Nobel, who was also a shareholder of the "Partnership") - the largest producer of kerosene in Russia. In this production, gasoline and heavy residues were considered useless waste and destroyed. And DI Mendeleev proposed to convert these waste residues into oils that are three to four times more expensive than kerosene. This struck the Nobel oil empire, as their Russian competitors could successfully compete with them.

Many years later, M. Gorky, who visited the Nobel plant, wrote: “The oil fields remained in my memory as my brilliantly made picture of a dark hell ...”, and Russian industrialist V. I. Rogozin, referring to the situation in the fields, noted that everything happened “without an account and calculation.

V.I. Rogozin supported D.I. Mendeleev in discussions with L.Nobel and, in accordance with the recommendations of the scientist, he began to process oil on the Volga-built plant, receiving from it, apart from kerosene, good quality lubricants. The controversy took place at a time when L. Nobel played a significant role in appointing Baku mayors, which naturally made it difficult for advanced Russian industrialists.

The last years of A. Nobel’s life were marked by a number of scandals: while organizing the market for smokeless powder A. Nobel sold his patent to Italy, for which the French government accused him of theft, his laboratory was closed. Then there was a scandal in connection with his participation in speculation in an unsuccessful attempt to lay the Panama Canal. Contemporaries called A. Nobel in the press "millionaire on blood", "explosive death merchant", "dynamite king".

In the 1888 year (eight years before the actual demise), in one of the French newspapers, an erroneous publication of A. Nobel's obituary (the newspapermen confused Alfred with his elder brother Ludwig, April 12 deceased) appeared with a censure of the invention of dynamite. It is believed that this event prompted A. Nobel to the decision to establish a prize, so as not to remain in the memory of mankind as a "villain of a world scale."

In November, 1895 in Paris, A. Nobel signed a will, according to which most of his fortune was to go to the Nobel Prize Foundation, which amounted to 31 million crowns. In his testament A. Nobel stated his will in this way: to give a premium to those who brought the greatest benefit to mankind as a percentage of his capital. Awards were to be awarded in five areas: medicine, physics, chemistry, literature and peacemaking.

Few people know that there was also a special prize for Alfred’s brother Ludwig Nobel for Russia, since he lived 56 years from 66 years in Russia. In 1889, the Russian Technical Society and the Oil Production Partnership Br. Nobel "" established a gold medal and the award named "Ludwig Emanuel Nobel." From this time on to 1917, the gold medal and award were awarded every five years for research and development in the field of science and technology.

At the end of March, 2007, in St. Petersburg, was awarded the revived Ludwig Nobel Prize. The first winners were poet E. Yevtushenko, writer C. Aitmatov, pilot-cosmonaut A. Leonov, grandmaster A. Karpov, choreographer V. Vasilyev, head of the Rehabilitation Center V. Dikul, head of the investment and construction department of OAO Gazprom J. Golko, Vice-President of UNESCO SPASUM St. Petersburg V. Skvirsky (Industrial and Construction Review ”, No. 100, April, 2007).

Thus, if before the revolution the Ludwig Nobel Prize was awarded for scientific and technical achievements, now the category of award winners has expanded in such a way that it is awarded for general services to the democratic regime. That is why the list of award winners is so strange, among which there is not a single scientist. The presentation of the award turned into a kind of democratic party of the “creative” intelligentsia.

And the work of the Committee for the award of the well-known Alfred Nobel Prize is also full of injustice. Although the capital underlying the future Nobel Prize was paid for with Russian oil and the labor of Russian workers, engineers, scientists, Russian became laureates in the rarest cases.

The absence among the Nobel laureates of DI Mendeleev, the ingenious creator of the Periodic Law, is the most disgraceful fact in the history of the committee and the clearest characteristic of its activities: when awarding the prize the scientific achievements of the applicant are not decisive. Doctor of Geological Sciences A.M. Blokh in the article “Nobelian” by Dmitri Mendeleev (Priroda, No. 2, 2002) writes that Dmitry Ivanovich thrice (1905, 1906, 1907) was nominated for the Nobel Prize, but the prize was not awarded to him under the pretext that the discovery was made by him long ago. And the entire world scientific community, as if imitating the Nobel Committee, seeks to hide the merits of Russian scientists: in all countries of the world, the Periodic Mendeleev Law is usually published abroad without mentioning the name of its author.

The role of Russian and Soviet scientists for the entire period of the existence of the Nobel Prizes was deliberately minimized and silenced by the "world scientific community." The Russophobia of the Nobel Committee also manifested itself in the award of the 2009 prizes of the year: the teams of laureates in biology and chemistry “forgot” to include Russian scientists - the authors of the ideas being developed.

As of 2009, only 19 citizens of Russia and the USSR received 15 Nobel Prizes - significantly less than representatives of the USA (304), Great Britain (114), Germany (100) or France (54).

Nobel Prize - the tool of masons, Russophobes and parasites


Note that A. V. Abrikosov at the time of the award was a US citizen.

The award of the Nobel Prize to immigrants from Russia was and is of a purely political, anti-Russian or anti-Soviet nature. The prize was awarded to the destroyer of the Great Power of the USSR M. Gorbachev, who is now favored by his Western friends in every way - in the West he is treated and fed, giving lectures, the theme of which should sound like this: "How I destroyed the Soviet Union." And B. Pasternak received a prize not for his good poems, but for the mediocre, sharply anti-Soviet novel Doctor Zhivago.

Another example from the field of literature. So writes the "poet" Joseph Brodsky - about his former homeland - Russia:

This is a kind of fatherland, engraving.
On the bed - Soldier and Dura.
The old woman is scratching her dead side.
This kind of fatherland, splint.

The dog barks, the wind carries.
Boris asks for Gleb in the face.
Whirling couples at the ball.
In the hallway - a bunch on the floor.

Such a “correct” attitude towards Russia could not be ignored by the Nobel Committee - I. Brodsky was awarded the title of laureate. Undoubtedly, an important role was played by the fact that I. Brodsky emigrated and did not have Russian citizenship by the time he was awarded the prize.

The great Russian writers L. Tolstoy and A. Chekhov were not honored to receive an award, but although talented, but far behind them I. Bunin was noted by the Nobel committee - perhaps because he emigrated from Russia. As V.F. Ivanov noted in the book “The Russian intelligentsia and Freemasonry. From Peter the Great to the present day ”:“ Many Russian writers belong to the Freemasons and are dependent on the Masonic order ”. Calling a number of names of writers belonging to Freemasonry, he believes that this includes "in all likelihood, Bunin, who with the assistance of Freemasons received the Nobel Prize, which, as a general rule, is given only to Freemasons."

A striking example of the literary preferences of the Nobel Committee is the award of a prize in literature in the 2004 year to the Austrian writer E. Jelinek, who suffers from a hereditary mental disorder. Her work, according to critics - a mixture of pornography and sadism. We emphasize these words - "according to critics," because the general public is marked by a high award of the work, as a rule, does not read.

The award 2009 was awarded to German writer G. Muller, the author of the books: “Hot potato is a warm bed”, “Woman lives in a bundle of hair”, “Outside look, or Life is a fart in a lantern”. Apparently, the Nobel Prize in the field of literature should be renamed as follows: "For merits in the matter of debilization of the population."

Even L. Radzikhovsky (“The Nobel tip of the iceberg”) is naturally forced to remark very gently: “The grinding of scientists and writers (and even, oddly enough, politicians) compared to the first half of the twentieth century is an undoubted fact.”

Economic considerations are often cited to the question “Why the Russians are not given a Nobel?” Because the fund is formed as annual interest on the main Nobel capital located in financial institutions, mainly American, the Nobel Committee cannot ignore this. No wonder the number of American laureates is much larger than that of non-Americans. We continue this thought by asking the question: in whose hands is American money? It is not a secret to anyone that the financial institutions of the United States are in the hands of the Jews, therefore, the percentage of Jews among American and not only American, Nobel laureates is so large.

S.A. Fridman writes about this in the book “Jews are Nobel Prize Laureates” (M., 2000). By the way, in the book of S. Friedman it is indicated that the alternate D. I. Mendeleev in 1906 in the list of winners Ferdinand Frederick Henri Moissan was a Jew. He made a very private discovery - highlighted free fluorine.

Here are the data on the national composition of the laureates, taken from the article by L. Radzikhovsky “The Swedish Simhas Torah” (the Jewish Word newspaper No. 41 (214), 2004 g). As noted in the article from all living 220 winners: 82 Jew, 62 - Anglo-American, 15 Germans, 11 English, 6 Chinese, etc.

Here is another abbreviated quotation: “As is known, the Nobel Prizes are awarded from 1901 (in economics - from 1969). So, of the total number of laureates, Jews are: in physics - 26% (among American laureates - 38%), in chemistry - 19%, (among American laureates - 28%), in medicine and physiology - 29% (among American laureates - 42%), in economics 38% (among American laureates - 53%) ”.

L. Radzikhovsky enthusiastically calculates: "This amazing result becomes just crazy when it comes to" per capita "." Noticing that "Jews with their 26% in the twentieth century made up about 0,5 – 0,26% of the population of the Earth." Total: their ““ Nobel density ”- 1 laureate for 100 thousand people!” For Anglo-Saxons and Germans, according to L. Radzikhovsky’s calculations, this density was 1 laureate for 1 million.

And the article begins with the words: “So, this year the Swedes have surpassed themselves: from 12 Nobel laureates, seven are Jews! If we take only science - 6 from 10 ... One would think that the Swedes thus celebrated the Torah holiday ... ”We explain:“ Simhas Torah ”-“ Torah Holiday ”is a Jewish holiday dedicated to the completion of Torah reading in synagogues, which coincided with 2004. year with the date of the award of the Nobel Prizes.

Based on this statistics, the author concludes: “Jews, the“ people of the Book, ”who have studied the Talmud for thousands of years, are of course ideally adapted to intellectual activity. Therefore, they are willing to go into science, among them the percentage of scientists (including Nobel laureates) is much higher than among most European nations. ” Note that this statistic gives out L. Radzikhov’s extreme concern with the national question and clearly indicates that this question is also important for the Nobel Committee.

And here’s how the award of the Nobel Prize to A. Einstein, the famous plagiarist V. Bobrov (“For his affairs”, “Duel” No. 43, 1998) explains: “... active pushing Einstein into the Nobel laureates and his immense praise as the supposedly greatest genius of all nations and times - all this is a kind of curtsey ... for participating physics in the Zionist movement for many decades. "

A typical example of the selection of candidates for the Nobel Prize was given to L. Landau: “Such a noble prize, which should be honored by prominent minds of the planet, should be given to one Cherenkov club unjustly (reference - Pavel Andreevich Cherenkov discovered a new effect that got his name). He worked in the laboratory of Frank-Kamenetsky in Leningrad. His boss is the legal co-author. Their institute consulted the Muscovite I. Ye. Tamm. It simply needs to be added to the two legitimate candidates ”(cited from the book by Kora Landau-Drobantseva“ Akademik Landau ”).

The traditional activity of the Nobel Committee is the distribution of money and fame to its people. Thus, the award for environmental activities was awarded to a member of the US Jewish community, former US Vice President A. Gore, whose contribution to the cause of nature conservation was limited to shooting a mediocre film.

The pinnacle of the Nobel Committee's cynicism is the award of the 2008 Peace Prize to the former President of Finland M. Ahtisaari, who is the author of the project to create an independent Kosovo, that is, tearing away its ancestral lands from Serbia. Rewarding a person for gross violation of international law is a mockery of humanistic moral standards, over civilized norms of the life of the human community.

The motives for the public were the motives for awarding the Nobel Peace Prize to the president of the most belligerent state in the world - the United States Barack Obama. The formulation of his merits by the Nobel Committee is shocking: "For extraordinary efforts in strengthening international diplomacy and cooperation between nations." B. Obama became a laureate just nine months after taking office, and was nominated much earlier, that is, he simply did not have time to apply “extraordinary efforts”. This insolent mockery of public opinion, characteristic of the dominant financial system in the world, clearly shows who is the owner of the Nobel Committee and determines its policy.

The words "Nobel laureate" for people who understand the situation, no longer sound proud. Often, prizes are awarded for insignificant and simply dubious research, the Nobel laureates appointed by the “great” become heroes of incidents. So. J. Stiglitz, winner of the prize in economics, using mathematical formulas, argued that the global economic crisis that the world is experiencing today is impossible in principle. Let us cite the words of another Nobel laureate - A. Einstein: “There is not the slightest chance that nuclear energy can ever be used. To do this, it took the atoms to disintegrate according to our will ... ”(1932) This was said just thirteen years before the explosion of the first atomic bomb.

As the doctor of technical sciences FF Mende writes in the article “Are Nobel Prize Winners Wrong?”, The award is provided by “groups called scientific schools, in large part they consist of mediocre people, careerists and businessmen, who have no scientific value. The goals that they pursue are the seizure of a dominant position in a given branch of knowledge with the aim of access to material resources. Their tasks also include the fight against dissent, the maximum preservation of the existing state of affairs in science and the suppression of any new ideas that may damage their dominant position. ”

“A typical example is the grouping ... of Academician VL Ginzburg ... It controls all the main scientific publications on physics in Russia ... In the struggle for power and money, groups of this type resort to the most degrading methods ..."

Dr. A. Rukhadze, Doctor of Physics and Mathematics, spoke about the personal qualities of the late Nobel laureate V. Ginzburg (“Events and people, 1948 – 1991 years”, M., 2001): “What didn’t I like in V. Ginzburg? First of all, its national orientation. He once said that “with other things being equal, he will, of course, take a Jew to himself” ... ”

Although the criticism of the Nobel Committee is constantly growing, the reputation of the Nobel Prize as the most honorable in the world is carefully guarded both by “scientific” clans and by the biased media. And the highest scientific administration, keenly tracking the “general line”, worships the “Nobel Prize”. Academician N. Dobretsov demonstrates an anecdotal example of loyalism in the article “Medicine for the RAS” (“Rossiyskaya Gazeta”, dated 18 in May 2007) - arguing about the activities of the Novosibirsk Academgorodok, he writes: Alexander V. Kantorovich, a mathematician and economist. But, according to the most diverse experts, there should be at least six of them. ” What kind of "experts", according to what formulas did this mysterious number six be calculated?

For thinking people, the words “Nobel laureate” do not sound proud at all, for the Nobel laureate means only to belong to a certain mafia-nationalist clan, no more.

Here is another quotation from the article by F. F. Mende: “The award of the Nobel Prize translates the scientist into the category of revered, deified and untouchables. This process of canonization even overtook the church in life, where it was canonized only after death. Can we assume that the existence of such a phenomenon in science, as the award of the Nobel Prizes, brings her benefit? I think that many will agree that the process itself is far from objectivity and justice. ”

The activity of the Nobel Committee is not only unfair, but also dangerous, because the committee takes an active part in the formation of not just false elites, who, hiding behind the high title of laureate of the “most prestigious award”, occupy high places in the leadership of science, economics and politics.

The omnipotence of the Nobel clan led to the fact that world science was plunged into a state of crisis, which is manifested in a decrease in the level and effectiveness of scientific research, which often rolls by inertia, not reacting to the rapidly changing situation in the world, without solving the urgent, vital tasks of humanity.

Under these conditions, science has ceased to fulfill its main function - to provide humanity with true knowledge of the surrounding world.

The absolute power of the Nobel clan in world science is stifling really talented scientists. Under these conditions, who will save humanity from an economic collapse, from an impending ecological catastrophe?
Author:
Originator:
http://www.kramola.info/vesti/protivostojanie/nobelevskaja-premija-instrument-masonov-rusofobov-i-parazitov
56 comments
Ad

The editorial board of Voenniy Obozreniye urgently needs a proofreader. Requirements: impeccable knowledge of the Russian language, diligence, discipline. Contact: [email protected]

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. aszzz888
    aszzz888 19 October 2015 05: 48 New
    23
    Nobel Prize - the tool of masons, Russophobes and parasites


    Very accurate article title !!!
    Authors - each plus!
    And if we also recall the Nobel Prizes "for Peace", then I would like to ask right away: For what attempts were they given prizes to Obama and Gorbachev?
    And if they had a CONSCIENCE, they would be returned back. But it seems that such feelings are unknown to them. fellow
    1. Passer
      Passer 19 October 2015 05: 55 New
      14
      Always wondered: what should the "peace prize" mean, from the "dynamite king"?
      1. aszzz888
        aszzz888 19 October 2015 06: 12 New
        +6
        Passerby SU Today, 05: 55 ↑ New
        Always wondered: what should the "peace prize" mean, from the "dynamite king"?


        I am also "plagued by vague doubts." Perhaps, with the invention of dynamite, Nobel meant its peaceful use, undermining ore, pits, laying channels with water, etc. for the good of man.
        1. Ruslan67
          Ruslan67 19 October 2015 06: 20 New
          +9
          Quote: aszzz888
          . Perhaps, during the invention of dynamite, Nobel implied its peaceful use, undermining ore, pits, laying channels with water

          The monkey took a stick in her hand to knock a banana off a palm tree .... but she shied on the head off a neighbor who had already got it wassat
      2. afdjhbn67
        afdjhbn67 19 October 2015 07: 30 New
        +1
        Quote: Passer
        "peace prize", from the "dynamite king"?

        The unity of form and content ..
      3. traveler
        traveler 19 October 2015 22: 14 New
        -1
        for example, the Peace Prize in 1975 was given to Sakharov, the father of the hydrogen bomb.
    2. raikkonen
      raikkonen 19 October 2015 06: 00 New
      -1
      nobelov komitet nado razbombit ... kalibr..cabuuuuuuuuuuuummm
    3. Finches
      Finches 19 October 2015 06: 03 New
      13
      I think that Nobel himself laid the common sense in the prize! And the fact that the Anglo-Saxons imprisoned it for themselves by making an instrument, then nothing can be done about it! If in the sciences muhlezh is less noticeable by the scientific community and there are still elements of justice there, then the peace prize and the literature prize are pure profanity directed against objectionable. And I absolutely agree with the authors about the untouchable caste - such a prize must be given after the death of the laureate, after many many years, when the discovery or work will pass the test of time, and the silly peace prize be canceled altogether!
      1. Ruslan67
        Ruslan67 19 October 2015 06: 09 New
        18
        Quote: Finches
        then the Peace Prize and the Literature Prize - pure profanity directed against the unwanted.

        It’s hard to come up with a bigger profanity than an economic prize fool This is not a science but a sect request
        Hi drinks
        1. Finches
          Finches 19 October 2015 08: 28 New
          +2
          And on this branch - good morning! With pleasure drinks

          And I think that in economics it is possible to leave so that more economic theorists work for the cabinet prize, and not in the government put in practice economic experiments on people laughing
    4. ver_
      ver_ 19 October 2015 07: 06 New
      +3
      ... just like Malevich for the black square - so as not to go to jail ..
      1. Erg
        Erg 19 October 2015 08: 22 New
        +5
        I can give out a black circle and a black triangle. Isn't it art? .. wassat
        1. gramatey
          gramatey 19 October 2015 08: 39 New
          +1
          Too late. It was. From the same Malevich.
        2. Sars
          Sars 20 October 2015 13: 53 New
          0
          Exactly. All black squares, rectangles, the work of Picasso and other heresies are propagandized, cultivated and appreciated by the same team (see the title of the article).
        3. Sars
          Sars 20 October 2015 13: 53 New
          0
          Exactly. All black squares, rectangles, the work of Picasso and other heresies are propagandized, cultivated and appreciated by the same team (see the title of the article).
    5. Altona
      Altona 19 October 2015 10: 48 New
      +3
      Quote: aszzz888
      Very accurate article title !!!
      Authors - each plus!

      ---------------------------
      It was embarrassing that the authors of the article were scientists themselves, it would be better if the article was written by a publicist ... And it looks like envy ... But the parochialism, engagement and degradation of the Nobel Committee was noticed for sure ... And the fact that the prizes go to the representatives of "one nationality", discriminating against the rest ...
      1. venaya
        venaya 19 October 2015 19: 41 New
        +2
        Quote: Altona
        the fact that prizes go to representatives of "one nationality", discriminating against the rest ...

        That's it, to whom the right to distribute premiums belongs, only that one has priority in the distribution. Indeed, the article was written by famous scholars who, in fact, are aware of all these matters. It turns out that without the creation of national awards, which actually develop the desire for the development of national science, there is simply no way to do it. If these prizes are also awarded to outstanding foreign scientists, then in this case the status and authority of such prizes will increase to a greater extent, and may even additionally bring significant authority and respect to our country. I think this, in the prevailing circumstances, will not hurt at all.
    6. kot28.ru
      kot28.ru 19 October 2015 14: 17 New
      +3
      Obama is supposed to be beaten, a hunchback for a huge contribution to the destruction of the Soviet Union! And they live there for almost a hundred years, and for what, for the murder of millions? But it’s common to swear at Stalin in all the sins of the Russian state, but what better is humpback and bump? dogs are worthy of the honorary title of Judah, it is a pity that we still have monuments placed like subhumans! hi
    7. demo
      demo 19 October 2015 17: 50 New
      +2
      The authors made VERY bold statements.
      Without going into the truth or not of the facts and data presented, we must pay tribute to their desperate courage.
      The world of science is a cruel and uncompromising world of spiders in a bank.
      1. tank64rus
        tank64rus 19 October 2015 19: 28 New
        0
        Spiders are just insects. And here is the politician and scientist of the scientific mafia world.
      2. tank64rus
        tank64rus 19 October 2015 19: 28 New
        0
        Spiders are just insects. And here is the politician and scientist of the scientific mafia world.
    8. andrew42
      andrew42 20 October 2015 08: 31 New
      0
      The title of the article is bull's-eye, really. The author just went too far, blaming Nobel's "dynamite merits". You shouldn't be grimacing, because the development of technology has been, is and will be associated for a long, long time with the task of developing weapons. but otherwise, about the essence of the Prize itself, everything is correct. This prize should be called "1st Shnobel", since there is actually "Shnobel" - for insignificant achievements.
  2. Dynamic systems
    Dynamic systems 19 October 2015 05: 56 New
    +5
    Theater of the absurd.
    "... The cuckoo praises the rooster,
    For praising the cuckoo ... "
  3. slizhov
    slizhov 19 October 2015 06: 03 New
    +1
    Nobel will punish them ...
    1. 740
      740 19 October 2015 07: 03 New
      +4
      Quote: slizhov
      Nobel will punish them ...

      Aha. Dynamite casts from heaven laughing
  4. Alexander 3
    Alexander 3 19 October 2015 06: 10 New
    +3
    THIS PRIZE IS SAME AND THE MONEY OF JUDAH.
    1. ver_
      ver_ 19 October 2015 07: 13 New
      -4
      ... to the article about the birds -Judas - the wife of Christ = Prince of Bogolyubsky crucified on the cross - nee Kuchkova (place near Moscow) ..
  5. Dimy4
    Dimy4 19 October 2015 06: 38 New
    +9
    And the entire world scientific community, as if imitating the Nobel Committee, cares about hiding the merits of Russian scientists: in all countries of the world, the Periodic Law of Mendeleev is usually published abroad without mentioning the name of its author

    It has long been noted that all these Western gentlemen are very reluctant to say that the Russians made some significant discovery. And the Periodic Law of D. Mendeleev in the late 90s was also cited in some textbooks without mentioning the creator.
    And as for the creativity of all Brodsky and other similar intelligentsia - it sucks (although it can be said worse)
  6. Same lech
    Same lech 19 October 2015 06: 39 New
    +5
    now the category of recipients has expanded so that it is awarded for general services to the democratic regime.


    Most of the awarded Anglo-Saxons ... it seems that they only for themselves exceptional came up with this award .... as if they want to show that the smartest all gathered in the Anglo-Saxon race .... exceptionality is rushing from the Nobel Prize.

    And looking at the Nobel Committee, I got associations with the Politburo of the CPSU Central Committee in recent years.
  7. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 19 October 2015 06: 39 New
    10
    Nobel Prize - the tool of masons, Russophobes and parasites

    I won’t say anything about the Masons - I don’t know. But, that this is an instrument of Russophobia and parasites every year is seen more clearly. After the 2nd MV, the United States managed to privatize all international organizations and institutions.
  8. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 19 October 2015 06: 39 New
    +6
    Nobel Prize Award Criteria laughing :

    1. 'General merits to the democratic regime"
    2. Some strange "scientific and technological achievements. This dubious criterion should be eliminated long ago - it prevents the most ardent fighters for democracy from awarding prizes. laughing

    A separate criterion for the Peace Prize is the number of civilians killed (began to be applied from Obama). laughing
  9. Humpty
    Humpty 19 October 2015 07: 19 New
    +7
    Sholokhov was probably the last writer to receive a Nobel Prize in Literature for a normal, not ugly work. The Nobel Prize for Literature is by no means harmless, just like the Peace Prize. They are issued only to trusted comrades.
    1. EvgNik
      EvgNik 19 October 2015 08: 58 New
      13
      Quote: Humpty
      The Nobel Prize for Literature is by no means harmless, just like the Peace Prize. They are issued only to trusted comrades

      Here I am about that. Much has been written about Solzhenitsen. I want to express my opinion about Brodsky, who was called the great Russian poet. Firstly, this is not a Russian poet, although he writes in Russian. The fact that he is a Jew does not bother me, in the end Pushkin had African roots, but he is precisely a Russian poet (although Africans recognize him as theirs). Brodsky is a staffer. He wrote for them and hated Russia, although what did he know about it? Only according to early recollections before the expulsion in the year 72. And before and after his path lay not with Russia, but with the West. Again, the intellectuals will be indignant: oh, oh, you didn’t read, you didn’t understand! Calm down and read and understand. I realized that this is not Russian.
      1. 1976 dogs
        1976 dogs 20 October 2015 23: 25 New
        0
        Upon learning that the Russian Academy of Sciences nominated him as a candidate for the Nobel Prize in Literature for 1906, on October 8, 1906, Leo Tolstoy sent a letter to the Finnish writer and translator Arvid Yarnefelt. In it, Tolstoy asked his acquaintance, through his Swedish colleagues, "to try to make sure that this prize is not awarded to me," because, "if this happened, it would be very unpleasant for me to refuse." Jarnefelt fulfilled this delicate assignment, and the prize was awarded to the Italian poet Josue Carducci, whose name today is known only to Italian literary scholars.

        Source: http://www.calend.ru/event/4099/
        © Calend.ru
  10. Erg
    Erg 19 October 2015 08: 31 New
    +6
    Satan rules the ball ... My personal opinion is that mankind has gone crazy ...
  11. Reptiloid
    Reptiloid 19 October 2015 08: 38 New
    0
    It is time to stop wondering at them.
    But the Russians should know their heroes!
  12. todaygoodday
    todaygoodday 19 October 2015 08: 39 New
    +3
    Quote: Passer
    Always wondered: what should the "peace prize" mean, from the "dynamite king"?

    Arms designers should receive a peace prize. Russian designers. Especially all kinds of strategic missiles and delivery vehicles. That's who really invested tremendous efforts for peace on Earth.
  13. kartalovkolya
    kartalovkolya 19 October 2015 10: 06 New
    +6
    Yes, the authors were coolly kneaded, for which I am grateful to them! Of course, before there were many "doubts" about the activities of the Nobel Committee, but not many dared to speak out like that directly and with concrete accusations! It turns out that the Nobel Prize is in fact a banal bribe when recruiting many of our outstanding people into our ranks, and those who do not go to it will never receive a prize, even if they come out of their own skin ?! Masons, they are Masons, and their goals have not changed over the past centuries - world domination, at any cost!
  14. Platon
    Platon 19 October 2015 10: 40 New
    +9
    Nobel laureates Mikhail Gorbachev, Shimon Peres, Yitzhak Rabin, Albert Gore, Joseph Brodsky, Martti Ahtisaari, Barack Obama and Svetlana Aleksievich are more worthy of another invention of Nobel
    1. Humpty
      Humpty 19 October 2015 11: 19 New
      +2
      Quote: Platon
      more worthy of another invention of Nobel

      Use them instead of clay or sugar ?! Original yes
  15. Prutkov
    Prutkov 19 October 2015 11: 54 New
    +3
    Of course, setting up an analogue of the Nobel Prize is not a good idea. But to organize an alternative bonus. For example, a Nobel Prize is not given to mathematicians. This means that it is quite possible to organize an international award. There are a large number of other sciences that are not directly noted in the Nobel committee. For example, in history and archeology, including paleology ... So there is something to work on. But in no way duplicate the Nobel Prize.
    1. nstarinsky
      nstarinsky 19 October 2015 20: 06 New
      0
      An analogue of the mathematical Nobel is Field's medal. But this does not detract from the significance of the idea of ​​a new national / international Russian award. That would be most welcome.
  16. Arandir
    Arandir 19 October 2015 13: 17 New
    +3
    If I could put a hundred pluses for such an article.
  17. galakt
    galakt 19 October 2015 13: 36 New
    +2
    There is nothing surprising, yusiei cut the world for themselves with compasses and squares, abundantly sprinkling the places of their activity with greenery and bombs. They do not need to occupy territories, they buy governments or take them by the throat. Therefore, as a rule, these countries have no choice, except perhaps grave or poverty, at best. Globalization in Yusiei is a tough discipline, Nazi order and Yusiei's jurisdiction over the whole world. The Nobel Prize, in fact, lost its original meaning, if it was, of course, and became one of the tools of globalization and a prize for those who "do everything right." The Nobel Prize is required to be transferred to the jurisdiction of the UN. Contributions are made by all countries of the world so that there is no concept "who pays the money, he dances the girl" and politics is not in the business. It turns out strange, the international prize is distributed by a small corporatist, in a concise manner. This is no longer an international award, but a corporate one under strict guidance. An alternative to the Nobel can be in every country, an incentive, first of all, both for domestic use and for international use. He's not the navel of the earth, there are people more abruptly than Nobel, but, either poor or greedy. I do not mean Mr. Usmanov, here he is just what can pull on such an act, to establish an international Usmanov Prize.
  18. Svetlana
    Svetlana 19 October 2015 14: 25 New
    +4
    Great article! Thanks to the authors! It is high time to open people's eyes to all the "great" achievements of the Nobel laureates.
  19. iouris
    iouris 19 October 2015 14: 34 New
    +1
    It is regrettable that Nobel earned his capital in Russia.
  20. Kibl
    Kibl 19 October 2015 15: 13 New
    +3
    What Nobel what Shnobel one hell! Zionist divorce !!!
  21. Starik72
    Starik72 19 October 2015 15: 21 New
    +2
    Article and authors are a huge plus !!! And how many this hour of prizes besides Nobileevka is awarded, count. Teffi, Gremi, Oscar, Palm, Golden Lion and so on. And look to whom they are awarded. All this is done in order to belittle the contribution of the Russian estate in science and art, and to exalt the achievements of the Western estate. Thanks to the AUTHORS for the article !!! It is very, very topical! The murderers are awarded the Peace Prize, and the demagogues and verbiage Palm branches, Gremi and Oscars, and even the same Nobileevka.
    1. Dimy4
      Dimy4 19 October 2015 18: 59 New
      0
      And the Oscar will receive the one who more obseret the country through art. And who gets it with enviable constancy?
  22. Indifferent
    Indifferent 19 October 2015 17: 11 New
    +1
    Well done author! Ready to subscribe to his every word! The Nobel Prize has long become the Shnobel Prize!
  23. ilyaches
    ilyaches 19 October 2015 17: 27 New
    0
    Thank you for the article. Very interesting.
    It feels like the Nobel Prize is becoming like an American Oscar. All the same, the American will get it.
  24. 16112014nk
    16112014nk 19 October 2015 18: 06 New
    0
    There is also the "Shnobel Prize", which is awarded for all sorts of curious inventions. Can I apply to the UN to rename awards? what
  25. Panikovsky
    Panikovsky 19 October 2015 19: 29 New
    +5
    On October 15, I expressed my point of view on the subject of this award and the committee that distributes these prizes. The Nobel Committee, it’s not even an international non-political group of experts, it’s a kind of clan that distributes its dubious grants to whom it considers necessary, and most likely to those to whom it is ordered. Incidentally, Leo Tolstoy refused to accept this dubious prowess.
  26. 31rus
    31rus 19 October 2015 19: 51 New
    +1
    Well, the prize, well, the Nobel, but is it weak for ourselves? Let's say in the field of astronautics the Tsialkovsky or Korolev prize, in the literature of Pushkin or Tolstoy, but then just start the same story, only objectively and really deservedly, look at the Tchaikovsky competition, that's the topic for you
  27. nstarinsky
    nstarinsky 19 October 2015 20: 23 New
    0
    Oh, I’ll run into a lot of minuses now. I agree with the view that there is a bias in the priorities for awarding the Nobel Prize. I also agree with the idea that Russia can and should have its own high scientific award, which should be awarded not only to Russian, but also to foreign scientists. It’s for scientists, and not for everyone.
    On the other hand, being a physicist, I do not yet see an alternative in scale for assessing the achievements in our field of science. The article is clearly skewed. The Nobel Prize has been and is being given to Russian scientists, even if not so often, as they deserve it. Last week the award was given to Arthur MacDonald, a Canadian physicist. I worked under his leadership during those three years when we made the "Nobel" discovery. Physicists from many countries worked in the collaboration. And I am personally glad that my name is on the list of authors of this Nobel Prize. This is the merit of our MEPhI, the institute, which already has Nobel laureates - Cherenkov and Basov. But back to Canada. In his speech at the Nobel Prize celebration, Arthur MacDonald did not say a word (I was there!) In gratitude to the Canadian government, as is usually the case. Because the Conservative government of Canada was an example of a surprisingly unscientific group of idiots.
    Perhaps those who speak of the Anglo-Saxon base of the Nobel Committee are right. I don’t know how that is. I just want to emphasize that the list of physicists-laureates includes scientists with a very large contribution to this fundamental science. And whatever you may say, the news about scientific awards somehow returns the interest of the general public to science. Even if not as effective as we would like.
    In short - this topic is controversial. Difficult.
    1. 31rus
      31rus 19 October 2015 21: 44 New
      +1
      Dear, this is the same for me, to create an international commission, and it’s not necessary to copy the Nobel’s, to create my own, but international, I consider the peace prize to be completely absurd when on Earth, so many wars, the award for the sake of the award is not right, worthy people should be awarded, for worthy achievements and it doesn’t matter if he is an American or a Russian
    2. 31rus
      31rus 19 October 2015 21: 44 New
      0
      Dear, this is the same for me, to create an international commission, and it’s not necessary to copy the Nobel’s, to create my own, but international, I consider the peace prize to be completely absurd when on Earth, so many wars, the award for the sake of the award is not right, worthy people should be awarded, for worthy achievements and it doesn’t matter if he is an American or a Russian
    3. Panikovsky
      Panikovsky 20 October 2015 19: 45 New
      +2
      Quote: nstarinsky
      In short - this topic is controversial. Difficult.

      even in physics, chemistry, and biology, and as regards literature, economics, and, God, forgive me for the issues of the struggle for peace, with one kind of Nobel peacekeeper-Negro Obama, I want to demand calibers, calibers, and again calibers from our military-industrial complex.
  28. Baloo
    Baloo 19 October 2015 20: 36 New
    +1
    Physicist nstarinsky right. Russia needs its own prize in the field of science, biology and medicine, comparable and authoritative no less than a Nobel Prize. This is more important than the obscure "achievements" of Skolkovo and Rusnano. hi
  29. Denis Skiff
    Denis Skiff 19 October 2015 22: 49 New
    +2
    The pinnacle of the Nobel Committee's cynicism is the award of the 2008 Peace Prize to the former President of Finland M. Ahtisaari, who is the author of the project to create an independent Kosovo, that is, tearing away its ancestral lands from Serbia. Rewarding a person for gross violation of international law is a mockery of humanistic moral standards, over civilized norms of the life of the human community.
    Such dances have always been killing me around and around. It’s all exactly what to resent the arrogance of the killers. THESE have always been so, only the grave will correct them. Or wonder at the atrocities of a maniac.
    Establish your prize and forget about maniacs. Do not reward our prize, their clever people and especially the Jews. There is already too much money. Rabies is a treat at the time. What the fuck do you have with their bonus? Spit and do your own!
  30. Sergey242
    Sergey242 20 October 2015 01: 36 New
    0
    Do not believe those who say that quitting smoking in a week is impossible. There is a special and really working technique that will save you from this addiction in a few days, here dmitrinosov.blogspot.ru link I myself could not quit for a very long time, but this time it really turned out.
  31. Barakuda
    Barakuda 20 October 2015 05: 20 New
    0
    Gorbachev - Peace Prize. Thought out. Execution cannot be pardoned. am
  32. Sergey Leibedev
    Sergey Leibedev 28 November 2019 06: 01 New
    0
    The author of this feces is definitely sick!