60 attacks were made by aircraft of the aviation group of the Russian Aerospace Forces on positions and infrastructures of insurgents per day in Syria. Video

184
The Ministry of Defense disseminated information on the activities of the Russian aviation groups in Syria per day. It is reported that aviation of the Russian Aerospace Forces made 39 sorties, inflicting 60 attacks on terrorist positions and infrastructure facilities in the provinces of Hama, Latakia, Damascus and Aleppo. From message the press service of the Ministry of Defense of Russia:

As a result of blows destroyed:
4 command post gangs;
6 ammunition and weapon stores;
1 mortar battery;
2 underground bunker;
32 terrorists field camps;
6 militants strongholds.


For the destruction of a warehouse of ammunition of ISIL militants disguised in the mountains from the Su-24M aircraft concrete bombs were dropped. As a result of the detonation of the ammunition, the object was completely destroyed.

Su-34 aircraft to destroy the strongholds of terrorists used adjustable bombs KAB-500.

Video destruction of an underground bunker in the province of Hama:


Video of the destruction of the militants stronghold in the province of Latakia:


From the message of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation:
In one of the bunkers, an entire arsenal was equipped with ammunition and improvised explosive devices designed to carry out terrorist acts and sabotage.

In addition, a mini-factory for the manufacture of home-made unguided missiles was located here.
Many underground areas in all the terrorist-controlled provinces of the Syrian Arab Republic have been covered with similar fortified fortifications.

In the course of air reconnaissance in the vicinity of Vostochnaya Guta, Damascus province, an advance supply point for armed gangs was discovered, from which the militants provided ammunition, food and fuel. After the additional exploration of this object, the attack of the Su-25 attack aircraft was destroyed. Also destroyed four units of armored vehicles.


In the province of Hama, the strike of Russian aircraft destroyed the command point of the terrorist group Jaish-al-Fatah.

The Ministry of Defense reports that panic is growing in the ranks of the terrorists. Thus, in the province of Rakka, militants are trying to force the entire male population under the age of 14 (!) Years under arms. Militants receive orders from the faction leaders to go on the offensive, but many representatives of terrorist groups leave the territories on which the battles are fought and try to flee across the border.
184 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. His
    +4
    18 October 2015 15: 44
    Sivkov about events
    1. +28
      18 October 2015 15: 52
      laughing There is Girkin-Strelkov, and there is Sivkov. For rent they are relatives or at least from one yard. Everything is gone Chef everything is gone! drinks
      1. -34
        18 October 2015 16: 11
        When they stop smearing, is it really impossible to drop a dozen bombs, for sure.
        1. +65
          18 October 2015 16: 32
          In Syria, under the Russian bombs, innocent US money dies !!
          1. +30
            18 October 2015 18: 00
            Quote: herruvim
            In Syria, under the Russian bombs, innocent US money dies !!

            From the Internet:

            - Don’t hit there.
            - And where to beat? Here?
            - No, don’t hit here either.
            - Then let's beat there.
            - No, you can't beat there.
            - And where can I?
            - There.
            - Well, I will beat there.
            - No, only I can go there, you can’t.
            - And where can I go?
            - to you? You can't go anywhere.
            - And why?
            “You don't know where to beat.”
            - Do you know?
            - I know.
            - Then tell me where to beat.
            “No, you may misunderstand.”
            “Just tell me where to beat and that's it.”
            - No, I can’t, suddenly you will miss and I will be to blame.
            - What if you miss yourself?
            - No, I will not miss.
            “Why don't you miss it?”
            “Because I have precision weapons!”
            - And I also have precision weapons - look ...
            - The guard! Guard! He hit without permission! Guard!
            “But I did!”
            - He didn’t hit! He didn’t get there! He has a shortage!
            “But how did he not get when he got?”
            - He got where you can’t! Guard!
            - Yes, I’m okay!
            - Not! Not ok! Not there! Guard!
            - Lets do it...
            - Not! I do not want! I can not! I won’t! Not there! Ahhh! ..

            The teacher runs to the cry:

            - Who again offended Borenka? Is it you again, Vova ?!
            1. +4
              18 October 2015 18: 33
              Plus, definitely, a colleague, for the last sentence.
            2. 0
              18 October 2015 22: 27
              Vovka, he is Sharp, Turnu will clean the Greyhound villains. It’s not an ax that takes, not KuvaDlu, it will not seem enough.
            3. 0
              19 October 2015 00: 57
              But: Vova still punched in, despite the NLP curve of the "partner" !!! ... request

              In a series of anecdotes about Vovochka he is quite interesting, non-standard and SCUCHERNY (he always brings out a chum!) CHARACTER! request
          2. +8
            18 October 2015 18: 13
            Source of the Third World ?:
          3. The comment was deleted.
        2. +37
          18 October 2015 17: 27
          A cross is from a drone’s camera, not an airplane’s sight!
          1. +15
            18 October 2015 18: 47
            Nobody misses it. It seems from above that the bomb in the field has fallen, just there everything is underground. But it is clearly visible how small clouds of smoke shot up from the entire area along with the explosion, it is from all the vents and vents of the underground complex that a blast wave takes off that tore everything in there to pieces.
          2. +1
            18 October 2015 23: 28
            The cross is a special label for Western spiteful critics, and ours too.
          3. +1
            19 October 2015 04: 24
            Quote: maiman61
            A cross is from a drone’s camera, not an airplane’s sight!

            That's right, but 2 cheburatora is a bust laughing
          4. +1
            19 October 2015 10: 16
            I talked with the "flyers" commented - hits almost 100%
        3. +1
          18 October 2015 18: 58
          To surely one will be enough, a matter of time.
          1. +5
            18 October 2015 21: 06
            Quote: SibBars
            It's a question of time

            Overview of the map of hostilities in Syria for 18. 10. 2015
        4. +4
          18 October 2015 19: 40
          Yes they hit. Crosses are just for Americans to draw.
          1. +5
            18 October 2015 20: 31
            At the very beginning of the operation in Syria, the representative of the General Staff, who maintains daily reports on the work done by aviation, stated that the cross is just the center of the camera lens of an unmanned vehicle, which monitors the results of ammunition hit.
            1. -5
              18 October 2015 22: 32
              actually! some discussion of some crosses, drawn in Russian, on the fence (screen), for Americans! Absolutely no connection with the real sight and real destination !!! Moreover, it is impossible to judge the hit on underground structures !!!
            2. 0
              20 October 2015 14: 09
              Yes, he might not have said it at all, I don’t know how stupid it is to believe otherwise
          2. The comment was deleted.
        5. 0
          18 October 2015 22: 25
          "Eh, it's a pity that I sword it in Italy!
          I would have thrown a hammer at home without difficulty.
          Terribly far, far away
          And it would be better if only once and for all! "
          V.S. Vysotsky

          "Bear is having fun!
          Bear is fun!
          Bear is fun, look.
          Kukle is fun!
          Fun too!
          Very funny!
          One, two. three!
          (Children's song)
        6. 0
          18 October 2015 23: 20
          Exactly, what is it that they drop one bomb and there is no bunker, where is the scale? Not to see with old bombs, but with a carpet, right away.
        7. 0
          19 October 2015 06: 15
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          When they stop smearing, is it really impossible to drop a dozen bombs, for sure.

          Are you talking about the states? lol
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +9
        18 October 2015 18: 25
        Vladimirich. There is Girkin-Strelkov, and there is Sivkov.
        Well, do not think that in Syria, with the advent of Russia, things will be trampled on like clockwork.
        The first strike is always effective in all respects, but then, as they say, everything comes to a balanced state and strikes are not as effective as the first time. It means that ISIS sheep begin to supply and feed the front in a different way, mobilize their forces and resources to the maximum to organize a confrontation up to new 14-year-old recruits.
        Sivkov explains the situation in a completely balanced and unbiased way, and if someone is too patriotic and does not like it, then this is his (patriot uri) problem. In the end, he expresses his opinion (this is purely his opinion) about how events can develop and nothing more, and our general staff and general leadership in Damascus and Baghdad may have their own opinions and plans, and maybe Sivkov’s opinion is cunning misinformation according to our plans for partners, this is also a war on the front of misinformation.
        And he correctly said that stationary targets behind the front line do not greatly affect the front line and only weaken the enemy in the long run, although the psychological moment is considerable for both warring parties.
        I agree with him on the buildup of the group, but mainly the SU25s and strike MI28s that work directly on the contact line of the troops, but it is advisable to concentrate these maneuvers on the border with Turkey in order to cut it off from militants for supply, and this should be the most important thing.
        Next, it is necessary to track and intercept the transport of the geypartners, so that during the dumping of humanitarian aid to the jackals, they should wait and destroy what was dropped on the ground, either deliver Syria’s special forces there quickly or even land troops and secure it there by air strikes against possible attackers (weapons and there is chewing gum and what else is needed to maintain a position), and this is creating a hotbed by cutting and blocking disparate enemy units.
        Nobody will be more likely to calibrate from the Caspian, for it was indicative for everyone, and the number of missiles in the warehouses is surely there (no need to stoop), and if not using modern missiles, then there are less modern, but no less effective ones. So, here he got a little excited.
        1. SSR
          +8
          18 October 2015 19: 09
          Quote: Irokez
          Vladimirich. There is Girkin-Strelkov, and there is Sivkov.
          Well, do not think that in Syria, with the advent of Russia, things will be trampled on like clockwork.
          The first strike is always effective in all respects, but then, as they say, everything comes to a balanced state and strikes are not as effective as the first time. It means that ISIS sheep begin to supply and feed the front in a different way, mobilize their forces and resources to the maximum to organize a confrontation up to new 14-year-old recruits.
          Sivkov explains the situation in a completely balanced and unbiased manner. In the end, he expresses his opinion (this is purely his opinion) about how events can develop and nothing more, and our general staff and general leadership in Damascus and Baghdad may have their own opinions and plans and may have an opinion Sivkova is a cunning misinformation according to our plans for partners - this is also a war on the front of misinformation.
          long-term weaken the enemy, although the psychological moment there is considerable for both warring parties.
          I agree with him on the buildup of the group, but mainly the SU25s and strike MI28s that work directly on the contact line of the troops, but it is advisable to concentrate these maneuvers on the border with Turkey to cut it off from militants for supply, and this should be the main thing.
          Next, you need to track and intercept the transporters of the gaming partners, so that during the reset of humanitarian aid.


          Well, how many people have so many opinions.
          Everyone is sitting and waiting for what Sivkov will say. Why not Filingaura? This iksperda did not publish only very lazy.
          They mobilize 14-year-olds ..... And before, they took 9-year-olds altogether, if the same Lech or Mikhan are throwing pictures to you with heads in the hands of youngsters.
          60 flights a day, is it a lot or a little? And if you take into account that for proven goals, and if analysts throw more information on 1000 objects, will reliability improve?
          After the recent crash of the Mi-28, during the Army Games, how are you? I myself advocate for the Night hunters, but until they reveal and eliminate the hidden defects, they have nothing to do there. There, and so the climate with dust and sand will then make its own weighty corrections, and therefore only the most thoroughly studied turntables should arrive, so that the defects arising from the local collorite are eliminated as quickly as possible, as well as finding them.
          One of the indicators of effectiveness is the flight, this is the surrender of positions, this is the surrender, this is the accession of others to the Assad army (Kurds, who at least welcome the bombing of the Russian Federation and are ready for dialogue).
          On many other points, Mr. Sivkov is a populist playing on a racket of feelings.
          More planes and helicopters!
          Intercept transporters despite an agreement to minimize risks in the airspace ....... Oh yes?
          They recruit children!
          And before they gave them lollipops, and not prisoners to slaughter.

          In general, if I hadn’t answered from the phone, I would have answered in a detailed manner, but I think it’s already enough.
          1. 0
            19 October 2015 11: 49
            "Everyone is sitting and waiting for what Sivkov will say. Why not Filkingaura? This iksperda was not published only by a completely lazy one."

            Intercepting the drop point of the cargo, and not the plane itself - it must be understood that no one will fight with each other.
            "On many other points, Mr. Sivkov is a populist who plays on his feelings." This, as I understand it, is another opinion of many, and you probably think that it is the most accurate and correct.

            So I didn’t understand. Do you agree with Sivkov either categorically against or 50/50, otherwise I didn’t understand any questions why they are and how to react to them?
      4. +5
        18 October 2015 18: 41
        Our rushing in Syria. And rightly so, one should not let terrorists come to their senses.
      5. wk
        -2
        18 October 2015 23: 05
        Quote: Vladimir
        There is Girkin-Strelkov, and there is Sivkov. For rent they are relatives or at least from one yard. Everything is gone Chef everything is gone!

        unlike ur patriots from VO Sivkov and Strelkov make an analysis of life and combat practice .... but do not indulge in children's emoticons in their thoughtless comments for the sake of pluses ..... you understand the future Marshal VO!
      6. The comment was deleted.
    2. +7
      18 October 2015 16: 29
      This Sivkov does not understand that after two weeks of offensive, a short respite is needed to replenish supplies, repair equipment and clean up the liberated territory.
      1. wk
        +2
        18 October 2015 23: 08
        Quote: Genry
        This Sivkov does not understand that after two weeks of attack, a short respite is needed.

        Yes Sivkov does not understand .... where is he, after all, a military man and not a TV announcer Kiselyov or Brilev .... where is he to them!
    3. -45
      18 October 2015 16: 32
      the name of our aviation is that it is military-space forces, and what has "space" to do with it, what kind of weapon do we have for the space front? planets, blasters, starships? it's good that at least not aviation galactic ...
      1. +29
        18 October 2015 16: 45
        Quote: War and Peace
        the name of our aviation is that it is military-space forces, and what's more, here "space"

        Despite the fact that in space there is a constellation of satellites providing aviation needs for reconnaissance and target designation. This group is part of the videoconferencing.
      2. +10
        18 October 2015 16: 46
        Quote: War and Peace
        What weapons do we have for the space front? Planets, blasters, starships?

        For example, military satellites.
        1. -19
          18 October 2015 17: 06
          For example, military satellites.


          then why in the USSR or America there were no such grandiose names? Probably because the satellites are not POWER, but only intelligence and information, and POWER is primarily a WEAPON ...
          1. +15
            18 October 2015 17: 14
            Quote: War and Peace
            then why in the USSR or America there were no such grandiose names

            Ну и что? belay
            Quote: War and Peace
            Probably because the satellites are not POWER, but only intelligence and information, and POWER is primarily a WEAPON ...

            Is intelligence and information not related to power? Urgently transfer all Su-24MR to Aeroflot! Yes
            1. -13
              18 October 2015 17: 51
              Quote: Vladimirets
              Ну и что?


              the fact that satellites are not power, therefore people who know the meaning of the concepts do not call UNMANNED VEHICLES - unmanned force, or ENGINEERING TROOPS do not call ENGINEERING FORCE - this is fluent, our narrow-minded military "experts" in hanging labels would have at least a little command of the Russian language, otherwise everything is heading towards BRIGHTONBICH ...
              1. +9
                18 October 2015 18: 04
                Quote: War and Peace
                the fact that satellites are not power, therefore people who know the meaning of the concepts do not call UNMANNED VEHICLES - unmanned force, or ENGINEERING TROOPS do not call ENGINEERING FORCE - this is fluent, our narrow-minded military "experts" in hanging labels would have at least a little command of the Russian language, otherwise everything is heading towards BRIGHTONBICH ...

                Did you include d.uk? I repeat once again, why before the Su-24MR and other scouts were in the Air Force? If they, in your opinion, are not at all strong? Why were there RTVs in the Air Force, if they also had no power? request
                1. -16
                  18 October 2015 18: 16
                  Quote: Vladimirets
                  Quote: War and Peace
                  the fact that satellites are not power, therefore people who know the meaning of the concepts do not call UNMANNED VEHICLES - unmanned force, or ENGINEERING TROOPS do not call ENGINEERING FORCE - this is fluent, our narrow-minded military "experts" in hanging labels would have at least a little command of the Russian language, otherwise everything is heading towards BRIGHTONBICH ...

                  Did you include d.uk? I repeat once again, why before the Su-24MR and other scouts were in the Air Force? If they, in your opinion, are not at all strong? Why were there RTVs in the Air Force, if they also had no power? request


                  Yes, I see you turned on the fool yourself, what kind of su24? conversation, what about them or what? there’s a conversation about space, IN SPACE WE DO NOT HAVE MILITARY FORCES clear? There will be nuclear-powered military stations — WILL BE FORCE, and calling GLONAS forces is like calling forces —reportors sniffing information, even the communications troops do not call the communications forces, but they call them “COMMUNICATION TROOPS ...”
                  1. +8
                    18 October 2015 18: 23
                    Quote: War and Peace
                    nuclear-powered military stations

                    What is this? belay But in general, all the best to you, the conversation is meaningless.
                  2. 0
                    19 October 2015 01: 16
                    Do not google little (poyandeksit!) At the request of "VKS RF" before throwing it on the fan ?!
              2. +3
                19 October 2015 01: 12
                War and Peace,
                You are a PHILOLOGIST with a degree, or - an WRITTEN (to get to the bottom of the post).

                I apologize for some soldier rudeness and bluntness, but:

                What an owl about a stump
                What do we kick by
                The result is one.
                1. 0
                  20 October 2015 06: 49
                  ... Sholokhov ... "virgin soil raised" ..
          2. +19
            18 October 2015 17: 19
            Quote: War and Peace
            then why in the USSR or America there were no such grandiose names?

            I don’t know how in the USA, but in the USSR there were no satellites in the Air Force. They belonged to other departments.
            In the Russian Federation, the orbital grouping and the Air Force have merged. It turned out the videoconferencing. Judging by Syria .. symbiosis is successful.
            1. -15
              18 October 2015 18: 07
              Quote: dvina71
              Quote: War and Peace
              then why in the USSR or America there were no such grandiose names?

              I don’t know how in the USA, but in the USSR there were no satellites in the Air Force. They belonged to other departments.
              In the Russian Federation, the orbital grouping and the Air Force have merged. It turned out the videoconferencing. Judging by Syria .. symbiosis is successful.


              the fact that to other departments this does not mean that there were no military satellites in the USSR, you do not know do not say that in the USSR there were communication satellites with submarines, high-resolution optical photographing satellites, everything was there, only no one held them for FORCE. ..
              1. +7
                18 October 2015 18: 37
                Quote: War and Peace
                , everything was, only no one held them for FORCE ...

                You see .. in the Airborne Division there are household plots and business platoons, cooks, bakers .. Airborne forces because of them are no longer strong?
                1. 0
                  18 October 2015 19: 06
                  Quote: dvina71
                  You see .. as part of the Airborne Division there are household plots and business platoons, cooks, bakers ..

                  Companions and there are bakers and cooks. Auxiliary factor. According to your logic, the Airborne Forces should be called the Airborne Forces. X - household. laughing
                  1. +1
                    18 October 2015 19: 19
                    Quote: Ingvar 72
                    Companions and there are bakers and cooks

                    Yah? That's when they will cook in space then the Airborne Forces and will be with the prefix ..
                  2. +3
                    18 October 2015 19: 47
                    Quote: Ingvar 72
                    Companions and there are bakers and cooks. Auxiliary factor.

                    Question for filling.
                    What do you think, like anti-ship missiles, from submarines are aimed at a target?
                    1. -1
                      18 October 2015 20: 17
                      Quote: GRAY
                      What do you think, like anti-ship missiles, from submarines are aimed at a target?

                      I think the same way with the help of satellites. And what is the backfill?
                      P.S. In the US, information and "highlight" of the CIA is used regularly, but there is no mention of it. Ours wanted to give the air force grouping in Syria a kind of high-tech touch, changing the wording to the air force. Maybe this is correct, but I am a skeptic (like you), and for me it reminds me of the Chubais NANO prefix, in order to raise the image of the product with the same content.
                      1. +1
                        19 October 2015 07: 31
                        Yes, it’s just that the time and content have changed, it’s hard to immediately accept even from an air defense officer that it’s really a VKS now. And so it is. MiG -31 with anti-satellite weapons; It was still in our time; even at S-200, the upper boundary of the affected area was 42 km; S-500 with the possibility of hitting targets in the near space, I'm not talking about space reconnaissance, communications, control. And it’s not clear for what purpose the sleeping space debris suddenly begins to maneuver next to the elements of the enemy’s space grouping and all this is under a single command. so it’s not nano la-la.))) There are changes and the form must correspond to the content and tasks to be solved ...
                      2. 0
                        19 October 2015 18: 30
                        Quote: Ingvar 72
                        And what is the backfill?

                        Yes, nothing. We just cannot live without space.
                2. 0
                  19 October 2015 01: 25
                  Dvina 71,
                  gap pattern - a terrible thing!
                  Just quote to comrade Classics the formula from a physics textbook for the 6th grade of a very high school: "Force is a product ..." Measured in kilopis ... lyah.
              2. +2
                18 October 2015 19: 03
                War and Peace
                In fact, I agree with you, recently, by changing the name, they are trying to replace the concept of essence, and thereby distract from reality, as happened with the change of police by the police. But the coin has two sides, and the manipulation technique can be used for good. The purpose of this replacement is to improve the image of the aircraft as a whole. Cynically? Yes, but at the moment you need to maintain the electorate in a state of euphoria.
                From me you are a plus. hi
              3. +1
                19 October 2015 03: 20
                The VKS is a "technical" association, due to the fact that the VKG was attached to the Air Force. Are you expecting a Death Star from Putin? laughing
                This is a question of the military bureaucracy, and not of the "show-off" and the space cruisers of the Empire seen by the HoHlops in the Donbass. When combining different structures, you need to give them some name. And there is not only Glonass. Optical reconnaissance, interceptor satellites to cut the jeepies, spies who read information from satellites half-potential passive partners. And what to do with the MiG-31 with anti-satellite missiles?
          3. +1
            18 October 2015 17: 54
            The USA has always had pompous names. For example, a US beauty pageant is called Miss Universe.
          4. +1
            18 October 2015 21: 42
            Quote: war and peace
            For example, military satellites.


            then why in the USSR or America there were no such grandiose names? Probably because the satellites are not POWER, but only intelligence and information, and POWER is primarily a WEAPON ...

            ====
            soon from the atmosphere to space stretch
          5. +1
            19 October 2015 00: 56
            Quote: War and Peace
            it’s not STRENGTH, but only intelligence and information

            Knowledge is power! Without intelligence and information, any weapon is worthless.
          6. 0
            20 October 2015 18: 52
            Flamethrower systems also belong to chemical troops. But chemists, if not strength? request
      3. +11
        18 October 2015 16: 47
        Shoigu: “The formation of a VKS by combining the Air Force and the Aerospace Defense Forces is the best option for improving the country's aerospace defense system. This allows, first of all, to concentrate in one hand all responsibility for the formation of a military-technical policy for the development of troops that will solve problems in the aerospace sphere, secondly, through closer integration, increase the effectiveness of their use, and thirdly, to ensure progressive development of the country's aerospace defense system. ”
        1. 0
          19 October 2015 01: 38
          Not only everyone understands the tricky, oriental ornate phrase of Kuzhugetich ... hi

          Here is the unforgettable "dear Leonid Brezhnev"
          said pure concrete:
          "The economy must be economical"
          Said - as cut, SPECIFIC pepper!
      4. VK
        +2
        18 October 2015 17: 02
        S-500 will give you an answer wink
      5. VK
        -2
        18 October 2015 17: 02
        S-500 will give you an answer wink
      6. +5
        18 October 2015 18: 25
        Quote: war and peace
        the name of our aviation is that it is military-space forces, and what has "space" to do with it, what kind of weapon do we have for the space front?

        31 MiGs can destroy targets arriving from space? - They can. Can the S-400 destroy targets arriving from space? They can. C-500 can destroy space targets? They can!
        It’s just that the Air Force became a branch of the armed forces.
        1. +1
          18 October 2015 20: 23
          No, they can’t, for targets arriving from space, speeds will not be reached for interception. A SAM with 500 still not even in the experimental version.
          1. +1
            19 October 2015 07: 26
            Quote: Vadim237
            No, they can’t, for targets arriving from space, speeds will not be reached for interception. A SAM with 500 still not even in the experimental version.

            Vadim, why are you so lol Let those who "believe" in this continue to do so.
      7. +6
        18 October 2015 18: 32
        Quote: War and Peace
        the name of our aviation is that it’s a military-space force,

        Amendment: AIR-Cosmic forces. From here your further reasonings about illiterate military experts immediately become ridiculous.
      8. +1
        18 October 2015 18: 45
        Count, people, there are smart men (unlike some, e)! Some think, others do. As a result, the west is crap. Business something.
      9. SSR
        +1
        18 October 2015 19: 28
        Quote: war and peace
        the name of our aviation is that it is military-space forces, and what has "space" to do with it, what kind of weapon do we have for the space front? planets, blasters, starships? it's good that at least not aviation galactic ...

        He also racked his head, but imha. Five types of aviation + HF, + Radio and all missile defense systems and related to them ... But it seems to me that they were transformed into the VKS in connection with the development of an early warning system, Strategic missile weapons and the last stone in the form of the S-400, the S-500 will erase even more this line. Not only is it ready to shoot down the S-400 not only on distant approaches, it is already taking ballistic targets, and soon it will probably begin to "land" everything in space, and even in today's realities, even tactical aviation begins to work in full tandem with space assets. Well, something is my clumsy opinion.)))
      10. +4
        18 October 2015 19: 50
        Because it’s not aerospace, but aerospace. And our diplomas were carried everywhere military, the same diplomats call a submarine a submarine, not a submarine, as it is right.

        Aerospace Forces of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation (VKS of the Armed Forces of Russia) - a type of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, formed in 2015 as a result of the merger of the Air Force and the Aerospace Defense Forces (VVKO) of the Russian Federation [1]. We began to fulfill our tasks from August 1, 2015 in accordance with the decree of the President of the Russian Federation V.V. Putin [2] [3].
      11. +2
        18 October 2015 20: 33
        Not. The name implies that the greatest danger to the country comes from the air and more significant from the space environment. It was to protect against such danger that this type of troops was created. It includes a space constellation, aviation and ground-based air defense forces (taking into account the advent of systems capable of shooting down low-orbit satellites). Well, if we get blasters or galactos, then the East Kazakhstan region will be renamed into something else, for example: The Galagatic Forces of Russia of the Russian Civil Aviation Administration!
    4. -20
      18 October 2015 18: 13
      -Sivkov specifically, intelligibly and correctly explained all the ineffectiveness of Russia's actions in Syria ... -What is interesting about everyone here rejoicing ..? -Russia has got into a dead end ... from which it will be difficult to get out now ... -Yes, and for a long time so Russia will be able to use all this expensive weapon (where to get it) .., and it is also necessary to increase the number of aviation and bombing .. ., and even carry out the supply of weapons and ammunition to the Syrian army ... -Where to get all this ..? -Where are the means for this ..? -The Chinese, as always, have withdrawn from all "these cases" and silently observe ... -They do not even want to "test" their new weapons in Syria ... against ISIS ... -And maybe even ... -they will start to supply " ISIS members "modern air defense systems (racing with the Americans) to shoot down Russian planes ...
      - The euphoria will soon disappear ... and the enthusiasm will subside ... - As always ... - Russia did not succeed in a "small victorious war" ... - Let anyone ... be happy ... - But ... in real life ... - everything is tragic enough ... - And I don't give a damn about the "cons" ...
      1. SSR
        +2
        19 October 2015 03: 23
        1. What kind of victorious is this? In general, the Russian Federation announced a short-term BBO, limited in time
        2. It is the Syrians with the help of Hezbollah and the Iranians must win on earth
        3. About expensive weapons. And what do you think of the Russian Federation cheaper for four years to supply Syria with the Big Landing Ships and other transport was cheap and you can do this for another years?
        4. About delivering a PZRK igil to the Chinese, you are like a goose the fifth point in a puddle, but do you know that there are Chinese people pumping in this igil?

        I can only agree with one of your postulates - the Chinese are on the sidelines. Although there is another point))) the Chinese themselves do not approve of this part of Xi’s policy, they believe that Xi should be more actively involved in the destruction of the igil.
      2. +1
        19 October 2015 15: 18
        Do you propose to sit quietly and watch how the bearded having cut Syria will come to us in the Volga region and the Caucasus? Do you understand that there was no choice at all? what is our war and our problems?
    5. Tor5
      -4
      18 October 2015 22: 17
      Absolutely right and fair!
    6. The comment was deleted.
  2. +29
    18 October 2015 15: 50
    Barmaley had not to dig bunkers and underground passages, but to dig ditches and put up fences from the net - netting!
    1. +14
      18 October 2015 16: 09
      And this is how our MLRS work, it’s stuffing and roasting Igilov’s twins at the same time ...
      1. +7
        18 October 2015 16: 19
        From a different angle, fewer tantrums ...
        1. +6
          18 October 2015 17: 20
          Burned out .. And for some reason it pleases ..
        2. +1
          18 October 2015 18: 38
          This is not an MLRS, but the SUNSETERS bearded in the distance
          1. +3
            18 October 2015 19: 18
            Solntsepek and Pinocchio also MLRS. Here the specialists saw Smerch or Hurricane with cluster munitions.
        3. +1
          19 October 2015 16: 28
          Like lights of light and music, "Grad" works!
      2. +6
        18 October 2015 19: 10
        Dumb sheep - they allah akbar is mentioned with everything, with a successful hit of the tank, and with the separation of the head from a friend. Zombie.
    2. +18
      18 October 2015 16: 10
      - Why did the Turks decide that they shot down the Russian drone?
      - He sent them three times to @@@ .... laughing
    3. +18
      18 October 2015 17: 48
      Well, somehow) winked
      1. wk
        +2
        18 October 2015 23: 17
        Quote: nazar_0753
        Well, somehow) winked

        Quote: exalex2
        Burned out .. And for some reason it pleases ..

        Quote: sanja.grw
        This is not an MLRS, but the SUNSETERS bearded in the distance

        Quote: Ingvar 72
        Dumb sheep - they allah akbar is mentioned with everything, with a successful hit of the tank, and with the separation of the head from a friend. Zombie.

        Quote: Persistent
        “Why did the Turks decide that it was the Russian UAV that was shot down?” “He sent them three times to @@@ ....

        Quote: nazar_0753
        Well, somehow)


        I'm just "delighted" with the intellectual level of a whole line of commentators in the once respected resource Military Review ..... Maidan virus and Censor No penetrated!
      2. The comment was deleted.
  3. +2
    18 October 2015 15: 51
    This is efficiency! They do not go to the "bulk", the quality of work does not fall. If the Syrians do not fail, the situation will turn around within a few weeks.
    1. +6
      18 October 2015 16: 07
      No, it will not break. This is for a long time. The USSR with its resources was able to turn the tide only after 2 years, and Syria does not have such reserves. It is a miracle that she has been holding on for 4 years, now there will be success, but in a month the situation will not improve.
      1. +4
        18 October 2015 16: 12
        Quote: dr.star75
        No, it will not break. This is for a long time. The USSR with its resources was able to turn the tide only after 2 years, and Syria does not have such reserves.

        there the states openly opposed (MANPADS), but here, let's see ...
      2. +6
        18 October 2015 16: 30
        If compared with Afghanistan, then there were fundamental errors, of a political nature. In a Muslim country, act by the methods of political information and communist ideology. Well, the communist ideology on Islamic seedlings in one generation is not inculcated. And there was time - the cat sneezed. In the present situation - a completely different topic.
        In most wars in the East there is a significant psychologically - mystical component. Even the little Britons knew this well.
  4. +3
    18 October 2015 15: 51
    Well, what is it! Russia continues to interfere with the "coalition" "fight" with the "ISIS". !!!
  5. +5
    18 October 2015 15: 59
    Now "exceptional" howls will raise and will persuade that the wrong people were bombed, they got there, they killed civilians, etc.
  6. +1
    18 October 2015 16: 01
    Eh, to close in one mousetrap, not allowing to leak through the world ...
    1. +5
      18 October 2015 16: 06
      Quote: slizhov
      Eh, to close in one mousetrap, not allowing to leak through the world ...

      It’s hard to close Turkey. When she is a member of NATO. hi
  7. +7
    18 October 2015 16: 13
    The actions of the Russian aviation destroyed the long-term opinion of the Western "world" about Russia and its Army as a "colossus with feet of clay". For centuries, foreign "media" have hammered this tale into the head of the Euro-American man in the street. That is why all these squeals, screams about the actions of our Aviation. All this sholoba, with the exception of a small number of sane professional politicians, military and intelligence officers, did not assume such a high level of combat training of Russian aviation pilots and the presence of high-precision weapons and the most modern guidance systems. Now the Western "public" has realized how strong Russia is and therefore such a reaction to what is happening.
    1. 0
      19 October 2015 08: 15
      I agree that the work of the Russian Aerospace Forces in Syria also has an important factor in containing hot heads in Washington about "but we should not check them in a land operation."
  8. 0
    18 October 2015 16: 15
    Yeah, but the rats are fleeing to Turkey.
  9. yan 2015
    +1
    18 October 2015 16: 21
    I look at the video - and the thought .. blindness is what. on their concrete - our concrete breaker KAB-500.
  10. +17
    18 October 2015 16: 26
    60 attacks were inflicted by airplanes of the Russian aerospace forces aviation group on positions and infrastructure facilities of militants per day in Syria
    At this time in the Ruin ...
    1. wk
      -4
      18 October 2015 23: 23
      Quote: vc 72019
      At this time in the Ruin ...

      the article is not about Ukraine ... not about Ukraine .... the site is called the Military Review, not the Censor NO! ... there with their "funny" cartoons!
  11. +4
    18 October 2015 16: 27
    I remember how the liberals scoffed at Putin's statement "to get wet in the toilet" (and dill are still sneering at). But the main thing is that words are confirmed by deeds! And Obama's prettily sweet (for mattress makers) speeches have not been confirmed by anything, except for copious salivation.
  12. +6
    18 October 2015 16: 29
    Turkey is difficult to close, but they have a difficult place, Kurds, who can and should supply weapons. This will distract Turkey from international affairs and return it to domestic politics. They helped us in the Chechen Republic. So they need help.
  13. +1
    18 October 2015 16: 35
    After the explosion of the Batab500, the Poles will be overtaken by anyone who is in the radius of destruction, at least with a sound wave!
  14. -26
    18 October 2015 16: 41
    Has anyone opened the first video?
    Why does the cross of the sight stand in one place - the corner of the building,
    and a bomb explosion takes place in a completely different - a clean field
    near the garden plantation?
    1. -17
      18 October 2015 16: 44
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Has anyone opened the first video?

      I opened and looked.
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Why does the cross of the sight stand in one place - the corner of the building,
      and a bomb explosion takes place in a completely different - a clean field
      near the garden plantation?

      Because past laughing
      1. -5
        18 October 2015 16: 59
        maybe such accuracy is enough?
      2. +18
        18 October 2015 20: 22
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        I opened and looked.

        Where? I look in the book and see a fig? lol
        Why such a fright, this five-copeck earth has a dark background, different from the environment?
        With an increase from the main road to this five-copeck coin, a not very well-worn road is visible. What for? Youngsters went to barbecue with beer and heifers?
        In short ... laughing laughing laughing the crew of the armored train as part of Voyaka and A. Romanov - remove tibiteki, open hatches and ventilate towers soldier
      3. +17
        18 October 2015 20: 38
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Because past

        Yah? Watching the next comic wassat
        See the difference starting at 3 sec. 5 sec. Simultaneously with the explosion "on an empty field", three exhaust lines appear, almost parallel to each other. Again - with what kind of fuss? I think what ... in the bunker it choked.
        And do not be ashamed of you, touvarisch tongue tongue tongue ??
    2. +32
      18 October 2015 16: 49
      The plane is bombing and the drone is shooting! Well enough already to find fault with these crosses. Obviously ...
      1. -8
        18 October 2015 16: 56
        And, I don’t understand ... Usually, whoever bombes, takes off.
        1. +31
          18 October 2015 16: 58
          Quote: voyaka uh
          Usually, whoever bombes, takes off.

          So you live poorly? smile
          1. -11
            18 October 2015 17: 00
            Quote: Vladimirets
            So you live poorly?

            Thank you, your prayers wink.
            1. +3
              18 October 2015 19: 39
              Quote: Hello
              Quote: Vladimirets
              So you live poorly?

              Thank you, your prayers wink.

              You did not understand him. He hinted that you had planes since the 2-th World War. Then the planes accurately photographed, as a video proof, the results of shooting or bombing. Then the aircraft speeds were very low and the cameras managed to shoot everything.
          2. +1
            19 October 2015 10: 52
            ... So you live in poverty? ....


            ... Well, why are you picking on a warrior ???? .... Well, the person didn’t understand .... It happens .... In general, he is probably the most adequate of our Israeli comrades ..... wink
        2. 0
          18 October 2015 19: 35
          Quote: voyaka uh
          And, I don’t understand ... Usually, whoever bombes, takes off.

          The plane does not wait for the target to be hit and therefore no one removes anything. In addition, when hit by bombs, the plane is already far from the point of impact. After launching missiles or dropping bombs, all pilots in the world automatically make an anti-missile maneuver. If you do not do it, they will shoot you down No one knows when the missiles will start catching up with the plane. And even if they do not seem to be there, then they may "suddenly" appear and then it will be too late, a little later, to make excuses before God that they should not have been there.
          1. -11
            18 October 2015 19: 48
            Quote: Алексей_К
            The plane does not wait for the target to be hit and therefore no one is taking anything off. In addition, when struck by bombs, the plane is already far from the point of impact.

            I recognize the expert. The plane is far away, but how does it illuminate the target? Telepathy? wassat


            We look, we study:

            1. wk
              +1
              18 October 2015 23: 27
              Quote: professor
              I recognize the expert. The plane is far away, but how does it illuminate the target? Telepathy?

              "politically" I do not agree with the Professor, but here I am plus!
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. +1
              19 October 2015 00: 07
              Quote: professor
              I recognize the expert. The plane is far away, but how does it illuminate the target? Telepathy?

              Not by telepathy, but by radio electronics, a locator, or a laser. You professor, you should know that the plane does not fly after a bomb or rocket. He fired and then flies, and not at the aiming point. It's that simple, Watson.
              1. -1
                19 October 2015 06: 26
                Quote: Алексей_К
                Not by telepathy, but by radio electronics, a locator or a laser.

                How? After all radio electronics, a locator or a laser on an airplane that does not wait for the target to be hit and therefore no one is taking anything off. In addition, when bombed, the aircraft is already far from the place of impact. laughing

                What is it?


                Quote: Алексей_К
                You professor, you should know that the plane does not fly after a bomb or rocket. He fired and then flies, and not at the aiming point. It's that simple, Watson.

                You dear person have already decided whether the plane is waiting for the target to be hit or by telepathy it lights up. I'd like to know the opinion of the "expert".
                1. +3
                  19 October 2015 08: 41
                  Quote: professor
                  You dear person have already decided whether the plane is waiting for the target to be hit or by telepathy it lights up. I'd like to know the opinion of the "expert".

                  And the plane at this time hangs over the target, like a helicopter and waits for the explosion to occur and hangs a little more, it is looking for a new target in the same place
                  You "professor" will determine for yourself, finally, where these frames come from. The plane is not a helicopter, it flies far beyond the target in one second.
                  1. +2
                    19 October 2015 14: 10
                    Quote: Алексей_К
                    And the plane at this time hangs over the target, like a helicopter and waits for the explosion to occur and hangs a little more, it is looking for a new target in the same place

                    You open your eyes. Look again at this photo, Mr. "expert", only this time more carefully. Now we noticed that the Klen-P laser rangefinder is located in the nose of the aircraft, and not in the tail. Of course your plane is either flying backwards or has already departed. I beg you, answer how does it highlight the target if The plane does not wait for the target to be hit.

                    Quote: Алексей_К
                    You "professor" will determine for yourself, finally, where these frames come from. The plane is not a helicopter, it flies far beyond the target in one second.

                    Unlike you, I am not an "expert", but only a professor of sour cabbage who studies materiel. Poke your nose in the video where "The plane does not wait for the target to be hit and therefore no one removes anything. In addition, when a bomb hits, the plane is already far from the point of impact. After launching missiles or dropping bombs, all pilots in the world automatically make an anti-missile maneuver." wink
            4. SSR
              +6
              19 October 2015 08: 20
              I did not understand your video and your comment, if you have a plane highlighting and shooting - then it spins like a helicopter and the rocket flies in from the side, in the second video, in general, against the background of swinging trees from the wind. Maybe all the same shooting with a drone?))))
              1. +1
                19 October 2015 10: 57
                ..... then why it spins like a helicopter and a rocket flies in from the side ...

                .... Yes, everything is simple ..... Option one: two planes - one throws, the other highlights .... Option two: the airplane has a backlight platform with a viewing angle of 360 degrees. on the horizon lol ...
              2. +1
                19 October 2015 14: 22
                Quote from S.S.R.
                I did not understand your video and your comment, if you have a plane highlighting and shooting - then it spins like a helicopter and the rocket flies in from the side, in the second video, in general, against the background of swinging trees from the wind. Maybe all the same shooting with a drone?))))

                Not. Shooting from the target designation container. The illusion that the camera freezes, and then suddenly abruptly breaks and takes from another angle precisely from there. Target designation may also be carried out by another aircraft / aircraft.
                1. 0
                  19 October 2015 23: 20
                  In Syria, the Russian Aerospace Forces use satellite-guided bombs in 90% of cases, based on this, what video from the aircraft’s aiming system do you want to see? The bomb dropped perhaps 10-15 kilometers from the destination.
            5. +1
              19 October 2015 09: 04
              Still shooting from a helicopter, already the trees are swinging. so wash yourself!
        3. 0
          20 October 2015 07: 07
          .. threw and flew, and the observer recorded the result - either a satellite or a drone whose displacement is minimal ..
      2. +3
        18 October 2015 16: 56
        Quote: DEZINTO
        The plane is bombing and the drone is shooting!

        Yes, to hell with him from the cross, it also shows that there are buildings and there is a clean field. The bottom line is where the bomb fell.
        1. +2
          18 October 2015 20: 57
          and who said that the purpose of the building?
    3. +15
      18 October 2015 16: 49
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Why does the cross of the sight stand in one place


      Because it is not a designator. This is the drone camera sight.

      The fight got where she needed to get .., you just need to destroy the house ..)))
      1. +3
        18 October 2015 16: 57
        Quote: dvina71
        The fight got to where she needed to get .., you just need to destroy the house ..)

        Fun, and what was next to the house?. In my opinion nothing. That's where the hit was
        1. +9
          18 October 2015 17: 00
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          and what was next to the house?. In my opinion nothing.

          "Video of destruction underground bunker. "Sasha, you wanted to see the pointer?
          1. -14
            18 October 2015 17: 10
            Quote: Vladimirets
            "Video of the destruction of an underground bunker".

            Then the question is, how did you find the underground bunker in the open field and where is the guarantee of entry. So I can bring any video under it. I see that they missed, but I don’t understand why this tragedy causes it here.
            1. +10
              18 October 2015 17: 16
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              Then the question is, how did you find the underground bunker in the open field and where is the guarantee of entry.


              Everything is shown in the video .. And hit and bunkers and smoke from adits .. Everything is there. The target is hit.
            2. +12
              18 October 2015 17: 18
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              how in an open field they found an underground bunker

              The command of the armed forces claims that it draws data from various sources.
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              where is the guarantee of hit.

              Nowhere, I think none of the members of the forum will get into the bodies to count the corpses.
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              So you can summarize any video.

              For overpowering it to another country. smile
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              I see that they missed, but I don’t understand why this tragedy causes here.

              I think that obviously they wouldn’t officially spread the crap raid, all the more so with such a number of sorties there is probably plenty to choose from.
              1. -7
                18 October 2015 17: 22
                Quote: Vladimirets
                The command of the armed forces claims that it draws data from various sources.

                Command can claim to want. I say only what I see with my own eyes.
                Quote: Vladimirets
                Nowhere

                Then talk about getting it makes no sense.
                Quote: Vladimirets
                For overpowering it to another country

                I read comments, and I don’t see much difference with comments from the Censor
                Quote: Vladimirets
                I think that obviously they wouldn’t officially spread the crap raid,

                That's why they laid out that it is not possible to prove anything.
                1. 0
                  18 October 2015 17: 32
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  I say, only what I see with my own eyes.

                  I didn’t see that the building was destroyed, so they didn’t hit, right? recourse
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  I do not see much difference with comments from the Censor

                  That's for sure:
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  Command can claim to want.

                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  talking about a hit does not make sense.

                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  That's why they laid out that it is not possible to prove anything.
                2. +5
                  18 October 2015 19: 43
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  Command can claim to want. I say only what I see with my own eyes.

                  You don’t see anything, except for some kind of gap. Only he knows that the target is hit or missed, who knows exactly where this goal is.
                3. +2
                  19 October 2015 01: 04
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  Then talk about getting it makes no sense.

                  Then talk about a miss also does not make sense.
            3. +18
              18 October 2015 18: 27
              What did you see there? Do you have bunker data? Actually, it’s said to the public that they spotted the bunker with visual control, in fact, it’s the work of the agents and in general, here’s the simplest diagram of the bunker ... as you can see, it is built under the arch and is removed from the building, otherwise it will not come out later ... logic a serious thing, it is either there or not.
            4. 0
              20 October 2015 13: 21
              that is, the MOs deliberately upload videos of their misses to the whole world?
        2. +5
          18 October 2015 17: 48
          thank God that there IS NOTHING, otherwise you’ll have to tell everything about the couch, oh, and the war will end quickly ... damn, it’s like a site where there should be specialists, but then, looking at my mom’s porridge, it’s a little liquid ... I hate it!
    4. +10
      18 October 2015 16: 51
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Why cross the crosshair

      This is a video from a UAV, which has no side to the bomb except to look.
      1. +7
        18 October 2015 18: 03
        But what is the argument about the guys? They beat us not in buildings, but in underground structures.
        In the second half of the video (after the explosion) several outlets of the blast wave from the ground are clearly visible.
        I looked again, at the beginning of the episode, the exits of the explosion (dust) from the ground are also visible to the right of the place where the bomb hit.
      2. -2
        18 October 2015 19: 32
        Quote: Vladimirets
        Quote: voyaka uh
        Why cross the crosshair

        This is a video from a UAV, which has no side to the bomb except to look.

        Is the video from the bomber top secret? wink Why not?
        1. +1
          18 October 2015 19: 57
          Why put an additional camera, transmitter on the rocket? Better more fuel!
          1. -4
            18 October 2015 20: 03
            Quote: shaman2001
            Why put an additional camera, transmitter on the rocket? Better more fuel!

            And so as not to miss.
            1. +2
              19 October 2015 00: 15
              Well, damn it, I'm fixated on the video "necessarily from the rocket." They clearly explained that she, a video camera, is needed there like a cart with a 5th wheel.
            2. SSR
              +1
              19 October 2015 10: 15
              Quote: professor
              Quote: shaman2001
              Why put an additional camera, transmitter on the rocket? Better more fuel!

              And so as not to miss.

              The plane throws off BoNbu and further dialogue.
              Bonba
              - camera, camera, are you here ?!
              Camera
              - Yes, here I am, admiring the views. Cho need it then?
              Bonba
              Hey friend, look, where am I falling?
              Camera
              You fall into the swamp and what?
              Bonba
              Listen, can you show me where to fly?
              Camera
              - Ides you are in a stump, I’m not showing anyone, I’m showing everything on the Ise tablet
              Bonba
              - hear the bastard, what a pity to show you tell me where to fly? Or finely avenge the fact that the wedding could take off? .....

              It’s time to run to work, and so I was late for two hours))))
        2. +4
          18 October 2015 20: 22
          Quote: professor
          Why not?

          Professor, in the video twice, the camera first zooms in, zooms in, and then it breaks or something? what
          1. +1
            18 October 2015 20: 29
            Quote: Vladimirets
            Professor, in the video twice, the camera first zooms in, zooms in, and then it breaks or something?

            The Chinese batteries are dead. bully
            1. +2
              18 October 2015 21: 10
              Quote: professor
              The Chinese batteries are dead.

              Clearly, then you have a problem. Yes And yet, people, it’s good to harm innocuous jokes just because the flag is conspicuous. smile
            2. -1
              18 October 2015 21: 40
              Quote: professor
              The Chinese batteries are dead.

              But what about the concession that in the TSEHAL, the mustache of proper handicraft ???
              Well, and finally everything, Israel’s own factories are built and boiled.
              Quote: professor
              Is the video from the bomber top secret? Why not?

              (hit on Hamas television station)
              Quote: voyaka uh
              I'm just trying to understand how everything is organized ..

              0.5 Vodka and understanding will begin to come.
              Quote: voyaka uh
              But we are shooting right from the F-16. Under the fuselage
              such a pylon is a designator.
              (blew into the pipe at once to see the spechialist!)
              With the UAV "Heron, Eitan, Hermes 450, Hermes 900, Hermes 1500", you are instructing and filming! Pylons of the last century, Mazdai.
    5. +2
      18 October 2015 16: 57
      And why do you think this is a sight? Remove from a drone ..
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Has anyone opened the first video?
      Why does the cross of the sight stand in one place - the corner of the building,
      and a bomb explosion takes place in a completely different - a clean field
      near the garden plantation?
    6. +5
      18 October 2015 17: 14
      This cross is not a sight. This is the center of the drone image from which the survey is being conducted.
    7. +2
      18 October 2015 17: 16
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Has anyone opened the first video?
      Why does the cross of the sight stand in one place - the corner of the building,
      and a bomb explosion takes place in a completely different - a clean field
      near the garden plantation?

      because it’s not the cross of the sight, but the center of the shooting of the drone controlling the bombing
      1. -2
        18 October 2015 17: 25
        "and the shooting center of the drone controlling the bombing" ///

        That is, the drone does not know in advance where the bomb should go,
        and focuses (with its constant movement) its center of shooting on
        an arbitrary point on the surface?
        And then he notices a bomb explosion and begins to photograph it?
        I'm just trying to understand how everything is organized ...
        1. +13
          18 October 2015 17: 33
          Quote: voyaka uh
          That is, the drone does not know in advance where the bomb should go,

          The drone controls the bombing zone. Only the pilot knows the specific coordinates and the one who gave them these coordinates. In this case, BETAB was bombed. Obviously, the aiming point was not where the camera's sight was looking.
          On some video bombs explode a little away from the target. This is FAB-250/500 bombing, it is even advisable for them to explode not just in the building (because this building will simply collapse and eat all the power of the explosion, but nearby. The blast wave and the front of the fragments will destroy more than one building.
          1. +13
            18 October 2015 17: 44
            for dvina71:
            Thanks for the clarification. The fact is that we often have the Air Force
            publishes similar videos, they are shown on TV.
            But we are shooting right from the F-16. Under the fuselage
            such a pylon is a designator. He gives a cross, holds the goal
            and the explosion should accurately cover the cross. Therefore, I do not
            figured out.
            1. +5
              18 October 2015 17: 50
              Quote: voyaka uh
              But we are shooting right from the F-16.


              Vashcheto bombing is conducted from a height of more than 5 km .., the drone from a height of up to 1 km will show the results more clearly ..
              Soviet / Russian aircraft also have means of objective control. The idea of ​​shooting from drones appeared apparently as a response to the predicted wave of desa in the Western media.
            2. -6
              18 October 2015 21: 46
              Quote: voyaka uh
              The fact is that we often have the Air Force
              publishes similar videos, they are shown on telly.

              Here you can see right away, a man EDUCATED-HIGH-AND-NOT-ONCE !!! laughing
              Quote: voyaka uh
              We are shooting right from F-16

              1) The entire film crew sits astride it!
              2) What a pity that there is nothing other than the FU-16 in the Israeli Air Force, to tears! love
          2. 0
            19 October 2015 08: 24
            most likely even the pilot doesn’t know the specific coordinates, but knows the system for dropping ordinary bombs, and not those controlled by the professor. The pilot simply goes to a given azimuth, the bombs are automatically reset when they reach the reset point. This is the VKS, about which spears were broken on another branch
        2. +2
          18 October 2015 21: 43
          Quote: voyaka uh
          I'm just trying to understand how everything is organized ...

          Little construction boy walked
          Near a huge skating rink
          The boy wanted to look at the system
          Now it can be hung on the wall
    8. +3
      18 October 2015 17: 30
      A cross is from a drone’s camera, not an airplane’s sight!
    9. 0
      18 October 2015 19: 28
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Has anyone opened the first video?
      Why does the cross of the sight stand in one place - the corner of the building,
      and a bomb explosion takes place in a completely different - a clean field
      near the garden plantation?

      The Department of Defense has already explained. The cross is the place where the camcorder is aimed at a drone flying over the target. The main thing is the picture of the explosion of the target itself. If you hit, it means - hit, if by, then it means - by. This can only be judged by someone who knows where rockets or bombs were supposed to go.
    10. 0
      18 October 2015 20: 56
      because the cross is the center of the drone frame and not the scope
      1. wk
        +1
        18 October 2015 23: 35
        Quote: anti-Semite
        because the cross is the center of the drone frame and not the scope

        in short, in response to the fact that the bombing is not accurate (and it cannot be accurate, because it is carried out by outdated ammunition), they talk about some kind of drones cross .... it turns out that each drone accompanies a drone ..... do not tell .. . speed bomber and reconnaissance. compare drone ...... sorry I write to all of the above posts ... simple you are extreme!
        1. +2
          19 October 2015 07: 34
          Quote: wk
          in short, in response to the fact that the bombing is not accurate (and it cannot be accurate, because it is carried out by outdated ammunition), they talk about some kind of drones cross ...

          I am sure that those who are in the "topic" or just want to figure out what kind of ammunition mainly bomb the Su-24M in Syria, this photo is enough.
        2. 0
          19 October 2015 15: 25
          Is KAB obsolete?
      2. The comment was deleted.
  15. +17
    18 October 2015 16: 55
    Not at all. Just stupid Russians shoot stupid Russian bombs that don't fly aiming!

    Shoot in Syria and may bomb Kiev! Russians are so always drunk Vatan shto just a nightmare! laughing laughing wassat

    Drunken bears are sitting at the controls and playing balalaikas - what about the point bombing of the "coalition" of snipers who have been "fighting" terrorists for a year and a half!
    1. -8
      18 October 2015 17: 02
      Quote: DEZINTO
      e. Just stupid Russians shoot stupid Russian bombs that don't fly aiming!

      But I’m blind, I don’t see where the bomb hit huh? Or the point is that not even getting hit is still a hit and something else is not appropriate.
      Damn, I'm sitting on the Censor, no one sees anything at point blank
      1. +11
        18 October 2015 17: 36
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        But I’m blind, I don’t see where the bomb hit huh? Or the point is that not even getting hit is still a hit and something else is not appropriate.

        Yes, judging by the howls of the United States bombs get where they need to)))
        They are generally smart with us (bombs) -threw and forgot, they themselves find bunkers and CP.
        Merikos also has a cross where it is necessary, and more and more at hospitals and bridal weddings.
      2. +6
        18 October 2015 17: 48
        Do you think that if the bunker is underground, then it should be located exactly under the house? Is it kind of to make things easier? where is the bunker, but I don’t want to get under that house. The logic is just to make an entrance under some kind of building and dig it to the side, so that even if someone indicates that under this place the bunker will not be known from which side! 2nd, I fully admit that not all objects are struck the first time, poets and not all videos are laid out. I won’t shout that our weapon is a hundred times better than the American one, but it’s sure it performs its task.
        1. +6
          18 October 2015 19: 57
          Comrade, it is useless to prove anything to people who, by default, consider themselves mega-experts in everything in the world, and know in advance what is right and what is not. Even if we were shown that a rocket or a bomb flies into the window of an underground bunker, there will still be "special leases", foaming at the mouth / cutting off the sidepieces / choking on bacon (choose according to your interests) who begin to claim that they did not hit, they got into the cellar with cabbage , ended up in the punishment cell of the pioneer camp / secret torture keijibi to cover up the traces of crimes against progressive humanity ... In this case, in the vast majority of cases, these "specialists" are not only at the controls of a bomber, but at a regular turret. Apparently, they also do not know anything about such a beast as army intelligence. The GRU, of course, the bellies went to the Syrian beaches to warm up, and not to collect intelligence and carry out bandit groups ...
  16. +31
    18 October 2015 16: 58
    Whatever the West, the USA and their vassals said and thought before, the effective use of the armed forces, namely aviation, put them in a stupor. Nobody expected this. To be honest, even the majority of the Russian population did not think that our army had such effective weapons and professional fighters. If the ground army showed itself in Ossetia and the 2nd Chechen army as an army with good potential. That is the last time the aviation was to appear large in the DRA, not counting Ossetia (where the Su-34 first appeared, but where the losses of aircraft, including the Tu-22, were more noticeable). It is clear that there were air defense systems. But the use in the complex of all types of reconnaissance and surveillance (ground, air, space, electronic, etc.) and the infliction of pinpoint strikes with guided ammunition from aviation and ships plunged many into shock how much the potential of the RF Armed Forces had grown. Making some pray, others tremble, and we are proud of our army. After all, it is not enough to strike, prepare the airfield, transport equipment, aircraft and helicopters, etc. placement in a short time, study, reconnaissance, establishing communication with allies, etc. how many people were involved in solving these issues. After all, only the United States was proud of its missile and air strikes on Yugoslavia, Iraq, and here on you ... Against this background, Ukraine simply froze in horror, they can simply be ground to powder without entering the territory. The situation of the dog and the elephant. You can bark, but carefully, but bite, sorry. The rating of Russia did not grow, he jumped. For a long time everyone teased the bear, so he barked, yes ... I don’t like "hats", probably there is something to correct and improve, it is in such conditions that technology and people will be tested, Russia came out " into the light "and so far on the world podium she is by far the best. As colleagues from Israel, they love to suck on the Arab-Israeli war, showing off their army and now they will find 1000 reasons to douse us. But this is us, this is ours - we can protect ourselves and our friends, no matter how pretentious it sounds. I am proud that I am Russian and proud of my army!
    1. +8
      18 October 2015 17: 34
      Quote: Raider
      No matter how pathetic. I am proud that I am Russian and proud of my army!
      .

      Although pathetic, but very true. Comment is very optimistic. Hard to say.
    2. 0
      18 October 2015 17: 34
      Quote: Raider
      No matter how pathetic. I am proud that I am Russian and proud of my army!
      .

      Although pathetic, but very true. Comment is very optimistic. Hard to say.
    3. 0
      19 October 2015 08: 30
      in Ossetia, our aviation, or rather the general staff, went to the fullest, ran into Buki and suffered losses, but were discharged urgently, then not yet adopted by the SU-34, and it quickly extinguished ukronogodyaev with his Buki. So now in Syria there are only 4 of them. but it’s quick enough to extinguish any attempt by amers to use that serious thread against aviation
  17. +4
    18 October 2015 17: 14
    Mostly freely falling bombs are dropped, this is often seen on airplane suspensions. Therefore, such scatter.
  18. +1
    18 October 2015 17: 38
    The more the dawn, the better. It is a pity that others will replace this!
    1. 0
      18 October 2015 20: 56
      So it means - more bombs and missiles need to be done than they will multiply!
  19. +2
    18 October 2015 17: 39
    Bombs flew at targets, homeless bombers flew to hell, birds flew south - it was autumn)))
  20. The comment was deleted.
  21. +7
    18 October 2015 18: 18
    BDK - "Saratov" and "Nikolay Filchenkov" entered the Mediterranean Sea. Military trucks were visible under camouflage nets while passing the Bosphorus on Saratov. "From the news.
  22. -2
    18 October 2015 18: 23
    igil already has a panic, between osobochik begins !!! if we still bomb and ........
  23. The comment was deleted.
  24. +4
    18 October 2015 18: 34
    In my opinion, our military and diplomats are working in the Syrian crisis beyond praise: the successful actions of our pilots, open coverage of the results of the bombing, response to empty criticism of the West and constructive criticism of our West, coupled with proposals for equal cooperation ... All this gives noticeable results in a positive direction, both on the battle fronts, and on the information field, and in the public consciousness of ordinary citizens, including foreigners: most of the English-speaking comments in support of Russia, in a number of European cities, are demonstrations in support of the actions of the Russian Aerospace Forces in Syria. Of course, McCain and other "hawks" really do not like this, especially against the background of the one-year-old bombing of the Syrian desert by the coalition and the recent shootings of hospitals, electrical substations, civil infrastructure, and most importantly - B. Assad not only does not fail, but also strengthens his influence and positions! So one can expect all kinds of "mean things" from the West, but it is important for us not to make mistakes ourselves ... And God give us all good luck in the fight against the forces of Evil!
  25. 0
    18 October 2015 18: 39
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    Quote: DEZINTO
    e. Just stupid Russians shoot stupid Russian bombs that don't fly aiming!

    But I’m blind, I don’t see where the bomb hit huh? Or the point is that not even getting hit is still a hit and something else is not appropriate.
    Damn, I'm sitting on the Censor, no one sees anything at point blank

    How can one see a disguised object from such a height and with a camera of this resolution?
  26. +1
    18 October 2015 18: 59
    Quote: maiman61
    A cross is from a drone’s camera, not an airplane’s sight!

    Vidio bombings show aircraft too. Where are the drones?
    1. +3
      18 October 2015 21: 02
      Quote: Denimax
      Vidio bombings show aircraft too. Where are the drones?

      A drone, he is like a photographer at a village wedding request The photos were printed, but the guy who ran with the camera didn’t have one laughing
  27. +3
    18 October 2015 19: 29
    Quote: dvina71
    On some video bombs explode a little away from the target. This is FAB-250/500 bombing, it is even advisable for them to explode not just in the building (because this building will simply collapse and eat all the power of the explosion, but nearby. The blast wave and the front of the fragments will destroy more than one building.

    This is if the column is traveling, there the fragmentation effect of the bombs is preferable. And if the building, and no movement around, then the question arises: What is being bombed, and what effect do they want to get?
    1. +2
      18 October 2015 19: 38
      Quote: Denimax
      What is being bombed, and what effect do they want to get?


      Let's say the house, next to the jeeps with machine guns under a canopy, fuel supplies, weapons, bk .. Well, got into the house .. he collapsed .. bearded men jumped into jeeps and occupied another house ..
      In VKS Variant, it looks like this .. The house is almost intact, detonated, fuel burns, jeeps to dust ..
      Which is better?
      1. +2
        18 October 2015 20: 05
        It is better to zoom in with optics, if possible, and really see the destruction of the enemy. And so, only explosions are visible, it is not clear where. And the bombing of airplanes speaks for itself, mostly uncontrollable, blunt (with a good shrapnel). Well, it’s not convincing. I would like a result.
    2. 0
      18 October 2015 19: 45
      "ON some video bombs explode a little to the side of the target"
      Where do you get this from? From computer games or something. Why should the target be located in a building that is clearly visible from the same drone? All military facilities are camouflaged, even with ISIS. Disguise is such a thing, thanks to which you can hide from the cameras of drones, etc.
      And yet, someone wrote here, if ours missed, then this video would not be posted for general viewing. Otherwise, our "partners" have already raised a joyful howl.
      1. +2
        18 October 2015 20: 06
        Quote: Vyacheslav
        Where do you get this from?


        From the characteristics of FABs and OFOBs
  28. +1
    18 October 2015 19: 38
    Here you can see interesting footage and comments on the passage of ships through the Bosphorus https://twitter.com/YorukIsik
  29. 0
    18 October 2015 20: 17
    Beat, beat and beat
  30. +1
    18 October 2015 20: 25
    Quote: Denimax
    How can one see a disguised object from such a height and with a camera of this resolution?


    Let me remind you if you don’t know: for this there are reconnaissance satellites that probe the thickness of the earth’s surface for homogeneity, otherwise, search not only minerals (civilian satellites), but also dangerous minerals (bunkers, warehouses, factories, etc.). )

    Quote: War and Peace
    military space forces, and what has to do with "space"


    It is necessary to firmly grasp the slow-witted: not military-space, but AIR-space, i.e. aviation + satellites
    1. +1
      18 October 2015 21: 07
      These are not my words. Quote correctly!
  31. 0
    18 October 2015 20: 38
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    When they stop smearing, is it really impossible to drop a dozen bombs, for sure.

    And why did you decide. what do they smear? Or. if the bomb fell near the building this is a mistake ... However, it is not always the case.
  32. 0
    18 October 2015 20: 59
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    When they stop smearing, is it really impossible to drop a dozen bombs, for sure.


    Dear, where did you get this from? If you mean the "cross" in the frames and that the explosions do not occur in this crosshair, then you have a misconception. The crosshair is not the center of the sight; the crosshair is the center of the video camera. This is where our cinematic performances are misleading.
  33. +2
    18 October 2015 21: 01
    The fact that we had such monitoring with UAVs is a big step forward for the Air Force. But still, we are decently behind the USA, Europe and Israel. Even this, as yet short-lived, company of our VKS shows that shock drones are needed. Which in real time, day and night, are searching and destroying tanks, armored personnel carriers, mortar, gun batteries and other shaitan-arb. Well, and the corresponding range of ammunition for them. Then, the cannibals would definitely not be able to tear their stupid little Bosko off the ground.
    PySy: There was a sensational movie, about a year and a half ago, like the Iranians with the help of our Auto Base, they planted a Yusov strike drone. Really, our people couldn’t lure (buy, exchange, steal, .....) him, so that in a quick way, time does not wait, in the style of the Celestial Empire, to make an experimental batch of shock UAVs. Now would be the way. And running in.
    1. +1
      18 October 2015 21: 54
      PySy: There was a sensational movie, about a year and a half ago, like the Iranians with the help of our Auto Base, they planted a Yusov strike drone. Really, our people couldn’t lure (buy, exchange, steal, .....) him, so that in a quick way, time does not wait, in the style of the Celestial Empire, to make an experimental batch of shock UAVs. Now would be the way. And running in.

      Respected. And how do you explain the massive appearance of drones in the Russian troops over the past year? wink Everyone disassembled more than one drone on the cogs
      1. +2
        19 October 2015 06: 09
        Quote: Cossack Ermak
        Respected. And how do you explain the massive appearance of drones in the Russian troops over the past year? Everyone disassembled more than one drone on the cogs

        ... or acquired a license from Israel.
        1. +2
          19 October 2015 07: 38
          Quote: professor
          ... or acquired a license from Israel.

          Since 2012, the Ural Civil Aviation Plant (UZGA) has begun issuing a licensed copy of the Israeli Searcher-2 UAV - Outpost (pictured).
        2. 0
          19 October 2015 08: 34
          or bought, Netanyahu did not come to Moscow for nothing
    2. 0
      18 October 2015 22: 08
      Just a word:

      Quote: mitrich
      There was a sensational movie, about a year and a half ago, as the Iranians, with the help of our Autobase, planted a Yusov strike drone.

      Motor depot - complex passive locations. He cannot "land a drone" simply by the definition of the word "passive".

      http://topwar.ru/82223-kompleks-passivnoy-lokacii-avtobaza-m.html

      And so - yes, there was such a video too ..
      1. 0
        18 October 2015 22: 29
        Cat Man Null, I can not argue with this, not special. I brought something that was gundos on all the media. This is me about Autobase.
  34. ent
    +2
    18 October 2015 21: 26
    map with the situation in the SAR from the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, taken from courage
  35. +1
    18 October 2015 22: 15
    They have been mobilizing since the age of 14. Now there will be an occasion to scream that children are dying under the bombs.
  36. +1
    18 October 2015 22: 27
    Quote: Cossack Ermak
    PySy: There was a sensational movie, about a year and a half ago, like the Iranians with the help of our Auto Base, they planted a Yusov strike drone. Really, our people couldn’t lure (buy, exchange, steal, .....) him, so that in a quick way, time does not wait, in the style of the Celestial Empire, to make an experimental batch of shock UAVs. Now would be the way. And running in.

    Respected. And how do you explain the massive appearance of drones in the Russian troops over the past year? wink Everyone disassembled more than one drone on the cogs


    So, the drummer is, in the slightest degree capable of striking in real time is not the same! And all our drones are more reminiscent of the model group of young modellers of the pioneer house. And such drones are capable of riveting a lot of countries that are not a couple to us in other types of weapons. Here we are at the level of the 90s. What a shame.
    1. +1
      19 October 2015 01: 48
      Quote: mitrich
      So, the drummer is, in the slightest bit capable of delivering blows in real time there is no

      These drones are a target for air defense and even su-25 .. You can only bomb them with the Papuans. The need for such a drone for the RF Armed Forces is not obvious to me. But as a means of detection and control, electronic warfare .. yes for several days .., yes at a distance of several thousand km .. yes, such are needed.
  37. -1
    18 October 2015 22: 53
    Quote: professor
    We look, we study:

    There is nothing like leather
  38. +1
    18 October 2015 23: 09
    A decent and stressful number of sorties. Efficiency is undeniable! The main thing is to avoid the loss of our pilots and equipment! I think all the MSS and rescue measures have been taken and are in constant readiness. Good luck, men! We are waiting for all of you and especially NATIVE!
  39. +2
    18 October 2015 23: 54
    Quote: Vyacheslav
    How can one see a disguised object from such a height and with a camera of this resolution?


    Let me remind you if you don’t know: for this there are reconnaissance satellites that probe the thickness of the earth’s surface for homogeneity, otherwise, search not only minerals (civilian satellites), but also dangerous minerals (bunkers, warehouses, factories, etc.). )

    Denimaksu: to blame, however hi
  40. +2
    19 October 2015 00: 24
    The main thing is that our guys all return, they are great.
  41. -1
    19 October 2015 21: 46
    The Ministry of Defense reports that panic is growing in the ranks of the terrorists.
    Right. There was silence. Kill, rob, kill. And then there is such an unexpected person in the form of bombs and Caliber (2500 range). Sleep well Europe. Do not have to use weapons. Muslims will do everything right. They will find a common language with us Christians. Fortunately, they and we have smart people still full. Sleep calmly pederastic Europe.
  42. 0
    20 October 2015 01: 39
    Do not believe those who say that quitting smoking in a week is impossible. There is a special and really working technique that will save you from this addiction in a few days, here dmitrinosov.blogspot.ru link I myself could not quit for a very long time, but this time it really turned out.
  43. 0
    20 October 2015 04: 13
    The shouts of Western politicians "GONE Wrong!" - a quote from the famous American sado-maso-group thriller.
  44. 0
    20 October 2015 17: 39
    Why the US is killing Syria