Military Review

60 attacks were made by aircraft of the aviation group of the Russian Aerospace Forces on positions and infrastructures of insurgents per day in Syria. Video

184
The Ministry of Defense disseminated information on the activities of the Russian aviation groups in Syria per day. It is reported that aviation of the Russian Aerospace Forces made 39 sorties, inflicting 60 attacks on terrorist positions and infrastructure facilities in the provinces of Hama, Latakia, Damascus and Aleppo. From message the press service of the Ministry of Defense of Russia:


As a result of blows destroyed:
4 command post gangs;
6 ammunition and weapon stores;
1 mortar battery;
2 underground bunker;
32 terrorists field camps;
6 militants strongholds.


For the destruction of a warehouse of ammunition of ISIL militants disguised in the mountains from the Su-24M aircraft concrete bombs were dropped. As a result of the detonation of the ammunition, the object was completely destroyed.

Su-34 aircraft to destroy the strongholds of terrorists used adjustable bombs KAB-500.

Video destruction of an underground bunker in the province of Hama:


Video of the destruction of the militants stronghold in the province of Latakia:


From the message of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation:
In one of the bunkers, an entire arsenal was equipped with ammunition and improvised explosive devices designed to carry out terrorist acts and sabotage.

In addition, a mini-factory for the manufacture of home-made unguided missiles was located here.
Many underground areas in all the terrorist-controlled provinces of the Syrian Arab Republic have been covered with similar fortified fortifications.

In the course of air reconnaissance in the vicinity of Vostochnaya Guta, Damascus province, an advance supply point for armed gangs was discovered, from which the militants provided ammunition, food and fuel. After the additional exploration of this object, the attack of the Su-25 attack aircraft was destroyed. Also destroyed four units of armored vehicles.


In the province of Hama, the strike of Russian aircraft destroyed the command point of the terrorist group Jaish-al-Fatah.

The Ministry of Defense reports that panic is growing in the ranks of the terrorists. Thus, in the province of Rakka, militants are trying to force the entire male population under the age of 14 (!) Years under arms. Militants receive orders from the faction leaders to go on the offensive, but many representatives of terrorist groups leave the territories on which the battles are fought and try to flee across the border.
Photos used:
http://function.mil.ru
184 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. His
    His 18 October 2015 15: 44 New
    +4
    Sivkov about events
    1. Vladimyrych
      Vladimyrych 18 October 2015 15: 52 New
      28
      laughing There is Girkin-Strelkov, and there is Sivkov. For rent they are relatives or at least from one yard. Everything is gone Chef everything is gone! drinks
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 18 October 2015 16: 11 New
        -34
        When they stop smearing, is it really impossible to drop a dozen bombs, for sure.
        1. herruvim
          herruvim 18 October 2015 16: 32 New
          65
          In Syria, under the Russian bombs, innocent US money dies !!
          1. GRAY
            GRAY 18 October 2015 18: 00 New
            30
            Quote: herruvim
            In Syria, under the Russian bombs, innocent US money dies !!

            From the Internet:

            - Don’t hit there.
            - And where to beat? Here?
            - No, don’t hit here either.
            - Then let's beat there.
            - No, you can't beat there.
            - And where can I?
            - There.
            - Well, I will beat there.
            - No, only I can go there, you can’t.
            - And where can I go?
            - to you? You can't go anywhere.
            - And why?
            “You don't know where to beat.”
            - Do you know?
            - I know.
            - Then tell me where to beat.
            “No, you may misunderstand.”
            “Just tell me where to beat and that's it.”
            - No, I can’t, suddenly you will miss and I will be to blame.
            - What if you miss yourself?
            - No, I will not miss.
            “Why don't you miss it?”
            “Because I have precision weapons!”
            - And I also have precision weapons - look ...
            - The guard! Guard! He hit without permission! Guard!
            “But I did!”
            - He didn’t hit! He didn’t get there! He has a shortage!
            “But how did he not get when he got?”
            - He got where you can’t! Guard!
            - Yes, I’m okay!
            - Not! Not ok! Not there! Guard!
            - Lets do it...
            - Not! I do not want! I can not! I won’t! Not there! Ahhh! ..

            The teacher runs to the cry:

            - Who again offended Borenka? Is it you again, Vova ?!
            1. iliitchitch
              iliitchitch 18 October 2015 18: 33 New
              +4
              Plus, definitely, a colleague, for the last sentence.
            2. iliitchitch
              iliitchitch 18 October 2015 22: 27 New
              0
              Vovka, he is Sharp, Turnu will clean the Greyhound villains. It’s not an ax that takes, not KuvaDlu, it will not seem enough.
            3. Oman 47
              Oman 47 19 October 2015 00: 57 New
              0
              Но: Вова все-таки врезал, несмотря на кривое НЛП "партнера"!!!... request

              In a series of anecdotes about Vovochka he is quite interesting, non-standard and SCUCHERNY (he always brings out a chum!) CHARACTER! request
          2. mirag2
            mirag2 18 October 2015 18: 13 New
            +8
            Source of the Third World ?:
          3. The comment was deleted.
        2. maiman61
          maiman61 18 October 2015 17: 27 New
          37
          A cross is from a drone’s camera, not an airplane’s sight!
          1. crazyrom
            crazyrom 18 October 2015 18: 47 New
            15
            Nobody misses it. It seems from above that the bomb in the field has fallen, just there everything is underground. But it is clearly visible how small clouds of smoke shot up from the entire area along with the explosion, it is from all the vents and vents of the underground complex that a blast wave takes off that tore everything in there to pieces.
          2. varov14
            varov14 18 October 2015 23: 28 New
            +1
            The cross is a special label for Western spiteful critics, and ours too.
          3. almost demobil
            almost demobil 19 October 2015 04: 24 New
            +1
            Quote: maiman61
            A cross is from a drone’s camera, not an airplane’s sight!

            That's right, but 2 cheburatora is a bust laughing
          4. Alexey-74
            Alexey-74 19 October 2015 10: 16 New
            +1
            Разговаривал с "летунами" прокомментировали - попадания почти 100%
        3. Sibbars
          Sibbars 18 October 2015 18: 58 New
          +1
          To surely one will be enough, a matter of time.
          1. Dryuya2
            Dryuya2 18 October 2015 21: 06 New
            +5
            Quote: SibBars
            It's a question of time

            Overview of the map of hostilities in Syria for 18. 10. 2015
        4. shaman2001
          shaman2001 18 October 2015 19: 40 New
          +4
          Yes they hit. Crosses are just for Americans to draw.
          1. mark2
            mark2 18 October 2015 20: 31 New
            +5
            At the very beginning of the operation in Syria, the representative of the General Staff, who maintains daily reports on the work done by aviation, stated that the cross is just the center of the camera lens of an unmanned vehicle, which monitors the results of ammunition hit.
            1. Baikonur
              Baikonur 18 October 2015 22: 32 New
              -5
              actually! some discussion of some crosses, drawn in Russian, on the fence (screen), for Americans! Absolutely no connection with the real sight and real destination !!! Moreover, it is impossible to judge the hit on underground structures !!!
            2. dima mzk
              dima mzk 20 October 2015 14: 09 New
              0
              Yes, he might not have said it at all, I don’t know how stupid it is to believe otherwise
          2. The comment was deleted.
        5. Oprychnik
          Oprychnik 18 October 2015 22: 25 New
          0
          "Эх, жаль, что я мечу его в Италии!
          I would have thrown a hammer at home without difficulty.
          Terribly far, far away
          И лучше, если б раз - и навсегда!"
          V.S. Vysotsky

          "Мишке весело!
          Bear is fun!
          Bear is fun, look.
          Kukle is fun!
          Fun too!
          Very funny!
          One, two. three!
          (Children's song)
        6. varov14
          varov14 18 October 2015 23: 20 New
          0
          Exactly, what is it that they drop one bomb and there is no bunker, where is the scale? Not to see with old bombs, but with a carpet, right away.
        7. Semen Semyonitch
          Semen Semyonitch 19 October 2015 06: 15 New
          0
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          When they stop smearing, is it really impossible to drop a dozen bombs, for sure.

          Are you talking about the states? lol
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Irokez
        Irokez 18 October 2015 18: 25 New
        +9
        Vladimirich. There is Girkin-Strelkov, and there is Sivkov.
        Well, do not think that in Syria, with the advent of Russia, things will be trampled on like clockwork.
        The first strike is always effective in all respects, but then, as they say, everything comes to a balanced state and strikes are not as effective as the first time. It means that ISIS sheep begin to supply and feed the front in a different way, mobilize their forces and resources to the maximum to organize a confrontation up to new 14-year-old recruits.
        Sivkov explains the situation in a completely balanced and unbiased way, and if someone is too patriotic and does not like it, then this is his (patriot uri) problem. In the end, he expresses his opinion (this is purely his opinion) about how events can develop and nothing more, and our general staff and general leadership in Damascus and Baghdad may have their own opinions and plans, and maybe Sivkov’s opinion is cunning misinformation according to our plans for partners, this is also a war on the front of misinformation.
        And he correctly said that stationary targets behind the front line do not greatly affect the front line and only weaken the enemy in the long run, although the psychological moment is considerable for both warring parties.
        I agree with him on the buildup of the group, but mainly the SU25s and strike MI28s that work directly on the contact line of the troops, but it is advisable to concentrate these maneuvers on the border with Turkey in order to cut it off from militants for supply, and this should be the most important thing.
        Next, it is necessary to track and intercept the transport of the geypartners, so that during the dumping of humanitarian aid to the jackals, they should wait and destroy what was dropped on the ground, either deliver Syria’s special forces there quickly or even land troops and secure it there by air strikes against possible attackers (weapons and there is chewing gum and what else is needed to maintain a position), and this is creating a hotbed by cutting and blocking disparate enemy units.
        Nobody will be more likely to calibrate from the Caspian, for it was indicative for everyone, and the number of missiles in the warehouses is surely there (no need to stoop), and if not using modern missiles, then there are less modern, but no less effective ones. So, here he got a little excited.
        1. SSR
          SSR 18 October 2015 19: 09 New
          +8
          Quote: Irokez
          Vladimirich. There is Girkin-Strelkov, and there is Sivkov.
          Well, do not think that in Syria, with the advent of Russia, things will be trampled on like clockwork.
          The first strike is always effective in all respects, but then, as they say, everything comes to a balanced state and strikes are not as effective as the first time. It means that ISIS sheep begin to supply and feed the front in a different way, mobilize their forces and resources to the maximum to organize a confrontation up to new 14-year-old recruits.
          Sivkov explains the situation in a completely balanced and unbiased manner. In the end, he expresses his opinion (this is purely his opinion) about how events can develop and nothing more, and our general staff and general leadership in Damascus and Baghdad may have their own opinions and plans and may have an opinion Sivkova is a cunning misinformation according to our plans for partners - this is also a war on the front of misinformation.
          long-term weaken the enemy, although the psychological moment there is considerable for both warring parties.
          I agree with him on the buildup of the group, but mainly the SU25s and strike MI28s that work directly on the contact line of the troops, but it is advisable to concentrate these maneuvers on the border with Turkey to cut it off from militants for supply, and this should be the main thing.
          Next, you need to track and intercept the transporters of the gaming partners, so that during the reset of humanitarian aid.


          Well, how many people have so many opinions.
          Everyone is sitting and waiting for what Sivkov will say. Why not Filingaura? This iksperda did not publish only very lazy.
          They mobilize 14-year-olds ..... And before, they took 9-year-olds altogether, if the same Lech or Mikhan are throwing pictures to you with heads in the hands of youngsters.
          60 flights a day, is it a lot or a little? And if you take into account that for proven goals, and if analysts throw more information on 1000 objects, will reliability improve?
          After the recent crash of the Mi-28, during the Army Games, how are you? I myself advocate for the Night hunters, but until they reveal and eliminate the hidden defects, they have nothing to do there. There, and so the climate with dust and sand will then make its own weighty corrections, and therefore only the most thoroughly studied turntables should arrive, so that the defects arising from the local collorite are eliminated as quickly as possible, as well as finding them.
          One of the indicators of effectiveness is the flight, this is the surrender of positions, this is the surrender, this is the accession of others to the Assad army (Kurds, who at least welcome the bombing of the Russian Federation and are ready for dialogue).
          On many other points, Mr. Sivkov is a populist playing on a racket of feelings.
          More planes and helicopters!
          Intercept transporters despite an agreement to minimize risks in the airspace ....... Oh yes?
          They recruit children!
          And before they gave them lollipops, and not prisoners to slaughter.

          In general, if I hadn’t answered from the phone, I would have answered in a detailed manner, but I think it’s already enough.
          1. Irokez
            Irokez 19 October 2015 11: 49 New
            0
            "Все сидят и ждут что скажет Сивков. А чего не Филькингаура? Это иксперда не публиковал только совсем ленивый."

            Intercepting the drop point of the cargo, and not the plane itself - it must be understood that no one will fight with each other.
            "По многим другим пунктам г-н Сивков популист играющий на урякря чувствах." Это я так понимаю ещё одно мнение из многих и Вы наверно думаете, что оно самое точное и правильное.

            So I didn’t understand. Do you agree with Sivkov either categorically against or 50/50, otherwise I didn’t understand any questions why they are and how to react to them?
      4. INVESTOR
        INVESTOR 18 October 2015 18: 41 New
        +5
        Our rushing in Syria. And rightly so, one should not let terrorists come to their senses.
      5. wk
        wk 18 October 2015 23: 05 New
        -2
        Quote: Vladimir
        There is Girkin-Strelkov, and there is Sivkov. For rent they are relatives or at least from one yard. Everything is gone Chef everything is gone!

        unlike ur patriots from VO Sivkov and Strelkov make an analysis of life and combat practice .... but do not indulge in children's emoticons in their thoughtless comments for the sake of pluses ..... you understand the future Marshal VO!
      6. The comment was deleted.
    2. Genry
      Genry 18 October 2015 16: 29 New
      +7
      This Sivkov does not understand that after two weeks of offensive, a short respite is needed to replenish supplies, repair equipment and clean up the liberated territory.
      1. wk
        wk 18 October 2015 23: 08 New
        +2
        Quote: Genry
        This Sivkov does not understand that after two weeks of attack, a short respite is needed.

        Yes Sivkov does not understand .... where is he, after all, a military man and not a TV announcer Kiselyov or Brilev .... where is he to them!
    3. War and Peace
      War and Peace 18 October 2015 16: 32 New
      -45
      название у нашей авиации это ,что то -военно-космические силы,а причём здесь "космические" ,какое у нас есть оружие для космического фронта? планетолёты,бластеры,звездолёты? хорошо что хоть не авиационно-галактические...
      1. dvina71
        dvina71 18 October 2015 16: 45 New
        29
        Quote: War and Peace
        название у нашей авиации это ,что то -военно-космические силы,а причём здесь "космические"

        Despite the fact that in space there is a constellation of satellites providing aviation needs for reconnaissance and target designation. This group is part of the videoconferencing.
      2. Vladimirets
        Vladimirets 18 October 2015 16: 46 New
        10
        Quote: War and Peace
        What weapons do we have for the space front? Planets, blasters, starships?

        For example, military satellites.
        1. War and Peace
          War and Peace 18 October 2015 17: 06 New
          -19
          For example, military satellites.


          then why in the USSR or America there were no such grandiose names? Probably because the satellites are not POWER, but only intelligence and information, and POWER is primarily a WEAPON ...
          1. Vladimirets
            Vladimirets 18 October 2015 17: 14 New
            15
            Quote: War and Peace
            then why in the USSR or America there were no such grandiose names

            Ну и что? belay
            Quote: War and Peace
            Probably because the satellites are not POWER, but only intelligence and information, and POWER is primarily a WEAPON ...

            Is intelligence and information not related to power? Urgently transfer all Su-24MR to Aeroflot! yes
            1. War and Peace
              War and Peace 18 October 2015 17: 51 New
              -13
              Quote: Vladimirets
              Ну и что?


              то что спутники -это не сила,поэтому люди владеющие смыслом понятий ,не называют БЕСПИЛОТНЫЕ АПАРАТЫ -беспилотной силой,или ИНЖЕНЕРНЫЕ ВОЙСКА не называют ИНЖЕНЕРНОЙ СИЛОЙ -это беграмотно,нашим бы недалёким военным "специалистам" по навешиванию ярлыков хоть немного бы владеть русским языком ,а то всё катится к БРАЙТОНБИЧ...
              1. Vladimirets
                Vladimirets 18 October 2015 18: 04 New
                +9
                Quote: War and Peace
                то что спутники -это не сила,поэтому люди владеющие смыслом понятий ,не называют БЕСПИЛОТНЫЕ АПАРАТЫ -беспилотной силой,или ИНЖЕНЕРНЫЕ ВОЙСКА не называют ИНЖЕНЕРНОЙ СИЛОЙ -это беграмотно,нашим бы недалёким военным "специалистам" по навешиванию ярлыков хоть немного бы владеть русским языком ,а то всё катится к БРАЙТОНБИЧ...

                Did you include d.uk? I repeat once again, why before the Su-24MR and other scouts were in the Air Force? If they, in your opinion, are not at all strong? Why were there RTVs in the Air Force, if they also had no power? request
                1. War and Peace
                  War and Peace 18 October 2015 18: 16 New
                  -16
                  Quote: Vladimirets
                  Quote: War and Peace
                  то что спутники -это не сила,поэтому люди владеющие смыслом понятий ,не называют БЕСПИЛОТНЫЕ АПАРАТЫ -беспилотной силой,или ИНЖЕНЕРНЫЕ ВОЙСКА не называют ИНЖЕНЕРНОЙ СИЛОЙ -это беграмотно,нашим бы недалёким военным "специалистам" по навешиванию ярлыков хоть немного бы владеть русским языком ,а то всё катится к БРАЙТОНБИЧ...

                  Did you include d.uk? I repeat once again, why before the Su-24MR and other scouts were in the Air Force? If they, in your opinion, are not at all strong? Why were there RTVs in the Air Force, if they also had no power? request


                  Yes, I see you turned on the fool yourself, what kind of su24? conversation, what about them or what? there’s a conversation about space, IN SPACE WE DO NOT HAVE MILITARY FORCES clear? There will be nuclear-powered military stations — WILL BE FORCE, and calling GLONAS forces is like calling forces —reportors sniffing information, even the communications troops do not call the communications forces, but they call them “COMMUNICATION TROOPS ...”
                  1. Vladimirets
                    Vladimirets 18 October 2015 18: 23 New
                    +8
                    Quote: War and Peace
                    nuclear-powered military stations

                    What is this? belay But in general, all the best to you, the conversation is meaningless.
                  2. Oman 47
                    Oman 47 19 October 2015 01: 16 New
                    0
                    Не слабо погуглить (пояндексить!) по запросу "ВКС РФ" прежде, чем вбрасывать на вентилятор?!
              2. Oman 47
                Oman 47 19 October 2015 01: 12 New
                +3
                War and Peace,
                You are a PHILOLOGIST with a degree, or - an WRITTEN (to get to the bottom of the post).

                I apologize for some soldier rudeness and bluntness, but:

                What an owl about a stump
                What do we kick by
                The result is one.
                1. ver_
                  ver_ 20 October 2015 06: 49 New
                  0
                  ...Шолохов ... " поднятая целина"..
          2. dvina71
            dvina71 18 October 2015 17: 19 New
            19
            Quote: War and Peace
            then why in the USSR or America there were no such grandiose names?

            I don’t know how in the USA, but in the USSR there were no satellites in the Air Force. They belonged to other departments.
            In the Russian Federation, the orbital grouping and the Air Force have merged. It turned out the videoconferencing. Judging by Syria .. symbiosis is successful.
            1. War and Peace
              War and Peace 18 October 2015 18: 07 New
              -15
              Quote: dvina71
              Quote: War and Peace
              then why in the USSR or America there were no such grandiose names?

              I don’t know how in the USA, but in the USSR there were no satellites in the Air Force. They belonged to other departments.
              In the Russian Federation, the orbital grouping and the Air Force have merged. It turned out the videoconferencing. Judging by Syria .. symbiosis is successful.


              the fact that to other departments this does not mean that there were no military satellites in the USSR, you do not know do not say that in the USSR there were communication satellites with submarines, high-resolution optical photographing satellites, everything was there, only no one held them for FORCE. ..
              1. dvina71
                dvina71 18 October 2015 18: 37 New
                +7
                Quote: War and Peace
                , everything was, only no one held them for FORCE ...

                You see .. in the Airborne Division there are household plots and business platoons, cooks, bakers .. Airborne forces because of them are no longer strong?
                1. Ingvar 72
                  Ingvar 72 18 October 2015 19: 06 New
                  0
                  Quote: dvina71
                  You see .. as part of the Airborne Division there are household plots and business platoons, cooks, bakers ..

                  Companions and there are bakers and cooks. Auxiliary factor. According to your logic, the Airborne Forces should be called the Airborne Forces. X - household. laughing
                  1. dvina71
                    dvina71 18 October 2015 19: 19 New
                    +1
                    Quote: Ingvar 72
                    Companions and there are bakers and cooks

                    Yah? That's when they will cook in space then the Airborne Forces and will be with the prefix ..
                  2. GRAY
                    GRAY 18 October 2015 19: 47 New
                    +3
                    Quote: Ingvar 72
                    Companions and there are bakers and cooks. Auxiliary factor.

                    Question for filling.
                    What do you think, like anti-ship missiles, from submarines are aimed at a target?
                    1. Ingvar 72
                      Ingvar 72 18 October 2015 20: 17 New
                      -1
                      Quote: GRAY
                      What do you think, like anti-ship missiles, from submarines are aimed at a target?

                      I think the same way with the help of satellites. And what is the backfill?
                      П.С. В США информация и "подсветка" ЦРУ используется регулярно, но упоминания этого нет. Нашим же захотелось придать группировке ВВС в Сирии некий высокотехнологичный штрих, изменив формулировку на ВКС. Может это и правильно, но я скептик (как и Вы), и для меня это напоминает Чубайсовскую приставку НАНО, с целью поднятия имиджа изделия при том же содержании.
                      1. oblako
                        oblako 19 October 2015 07: 31 New
                        +1
                        Yes, it’s just that the time and content have changed, it’s hard to immediately accept even from an air defense officer that it’s really a VKS now. And so it is. MiG -31 with anti-satellite weapons; It was still in our time; even at S-200, the upper boundary of the affected area was 42 km; S-500 with the possibility of hitting targets in the near space, I'm not talking about space reconnaissance, communications, control. And it’s not clear for what purpose the sleeping space debris suddenly begins to maneuver next to the elements of the enemy’s space grouping and all this is under a single command. so it’s not nano la-la.))) There are changes and the form must correspond to the content and tasks to be solved ...
                      2. GRAY
                        GRAY 19 October 2015 18: 30 New
                        0
                        Quote: Ingvar 72
                        And what is the backfill?

                        Yes, nothing. We just cannot live without space.
                2. Oman 47
                  Oman 47 19 October 2015 01: 25 New
                  0
                  Dvina 71,
                  gap pattern - a terrible thing!
                  Просто процитируйте товарищу Классику формулу из учебника физики за 6-й класс очень средней школы: "Сила есть произведение..." Измеряется в килопиз...лях.
              2. Ingvar 72
                Ingvar 72 18 October 2015 19: 03 New
                +2
                War and Peace
                In fact, I agree with you, recently, by changing the name, they are trying to replace the concept of essence, and thereby distract from reality, as happened with the change of police by the police. But the coin has two sides, and the manipulation technique can be used for good. The purpose of this replacement is to improve the image of the aircraft as a whole. Cynically? Yes, but at the moment you need to maintain the electorate in a state of euphoria.
                From me you are a plus. hi
              3. Thronekeeper
                Thronekeeper 19 October 2015 03: 20 New
                +1
                ВКС - это "техническое" объединение, из-за того, что ВКГ придали ВВС. А Вы ждёте от Путина Звезду Смерти? laughing
                Это вопрос военной бюрократии, а не "понтов" и виденных хоХлопами на Донбассе космокрейсеров Империи. При объединении различных структур нужно же им дать какое-то название. И там не только Глонасс. Оптическая разведка, спутники-перехватчики, чтоб джипиэс выпилить, шпионы, которые считывают инфу со спутников полтенциально прАААтивных пассивных партнёров. А куда девать МиГ-31 с антиспутниковыми ракетами?
          3. alexander 2
            alexander 2 18 October 2015 17: 54 New
            +1
            У США всегда были помпезные названия. Например штатовский конкурс красоты называется "Мисс Вселенная".
          4. Victorio
            Victorio 18 October 2015 21: 42 New
            +1
            Quote: war and peace
            For example, military satellites.


            then why in the USSR or America there were no such grandiose names? Probably because the satellites are not POWER, but only intelligence and information, and POWER is primarily a WEAPON ...

            ====
            soon from the atmosphere to space stretch
          5. Garris199
            Garris199 19 October 2015 00: 56 New
            +1
            Quote: War and Peace
            it’s not STRENGTH, but only intelligence and information

            Knowledge is power! Without intelligence and information, any weapon is worthless.
          6. uragan114
            uragan114 20 October 2015 18: 52 New
            0
            Flamethrower systems also belong to chemical troops. But chemists, if not strength? request
      3. KG_patriot_last
        KG_patriot_last 18 October 2015 16: 47 New
        11
        Shoigu: “The formation of a VKS by combining the Air Force and the Aerospace Defense Forces is the best option for improving the country's aerospace defense system. This allows, first of all, to concentrate in one hand all responsibility for the formation of a military-technical policy for the development of troops that will solve problems in the aerospace sphere, secondly, through closer integration, increase the effectiveness of their use, and thirdly, to ensure progressive development of the country's aerospace defense system. ”
        1. Oman 47
          Oman 47 19 October 2015 01: 38 New
          0
          Not only everyone understands the tricky, oriental ornate phrase of Kuzhugetich ... hi

          Вот незабвенный "дорогой Л.И.Брежнев"
          said pure concrete:
          "The economy must be economical"
          Said - as cut, SPECIFIC pepper!
      4. VK
        VK 18 October 2015 17: 02 New
        +2
        S-500 will give you an answer wink
      5. VK
        VK 18 October 2015 17: 02 New
        -2
        S-500 will give you an answer wink
      6. Tusv
        Tusv 18 October 2015 18: 25 New
        +5
        Quote: war and peace
        название у нашей авиации это ,что то -военно-космические силы,а причём здесь "космические" ,какое у нас есть оружие для космического фронта?

        31 MiGs can destroy targets arriving from space? - They can. Can the S-400 destroy targets arriving from space? They can. C-500 can destroy space targets? They can!
        It’s just that the Air Force became a branch of the armed forces.
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 18 October 2015 20: 23 New
          +1
          No, they can’t, for targets arriving from space, speeds will not be reached for interception. A SAM with 500 still not even in the experimental version.
          1. Bongo
            Bongo 19 October 2015 07: 26 New
            +1
            Quote: Vadim237
            No, they can’t, for targets arriving from space, speeds will not be reached for interception. A SAM with 500 still not even in the experimental version.

            Vadim, why are you so lol Пусть те кто в это "верует" продолжают и дальше это делать.
      7. pilot8878
        pilot8878 18 October 2015 18: 32 New
        +6
        Quote: War and Peace
        the name of our aviation is that it’s a military-space force,

        Amendment: AIR-Cosmic forces. From here your further reasonings about illiterate military experts immediately become ridiculous.
      8. iliitchitch
        iliitchitch 18 October 2015 18: 45 New
        +1
        Count, people, there are smart men (unlike some, e)! Some think, others do. As a result, the west is crap. Business something.
      9. SSR
        SSR 18 October 2015 19: 28 New
        +1
        Quote: war and peace
        название у нашей авиации это ,что то -военно-космические силы,а причём здесь "космические" ,какое у нас есть оружие для космического фронта? планетолёты,бластеры,звездолёты? хорошо что хоть не авиационно-галактические...

        Тоже голову ломал, но имха. Пять видов авиации + КВ, + Радиотехнические и все СПРН и С ними связанные.... Но мне кажется в ВКС их преобразовали в связи с развитием СПРН, Стратегическим ракетным оружием и последнийм камушком в виде С-400, С-500 еще больше сотрет эту грань. С-400 он уже не только на дальних подступах самолеты сбивать готов, он уже и балистические цели берет а в скором наверное и все что в космосе "приземлять" начнет а еще в нынешних реалиях даже тактическая авиация начинает работать в полной паре с космическими средствами. Ну как то такое мое корявое мнение.)))
      10. sir_obs
        sir_obs 18 October 2015 19: 50 New
        +4
        Because it’s not aerospace, but aerospace. And our diplomas were carried everywhere military, the same diplomats call a submarine a submarine, not a submarine, as it is right.

        Aerospace Forces of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation (VKS of the Armed Forces of Russia) - a type of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, formed in 2015 as a result of the merger of the Air Force and the Aerospace Defense Forces (VVKO) of the Russian Federation [1]. We began to fulfill our tasks from August 1, 2015 in accordance with the decree of the President of the Russian Federation V.V. Putin [2] [3].
      11. dr.star75
        dr.star75 18 October 2015 20: 33 New
        +2
        Not. The name implies that the greatest danger to the country comes from the air and more significant from the space environment. It was to protect against such danger that this type of troops was created. It includes a space constellation, aviation and ground-based air defense forces (taking into account the advent of systems capable of shooting down low-orbit satellites). Well, if we get blasters or galactos, then the East Kazakhstan region will be renamed into something else, for example: The Galagatic Forces of Russia of the Russian Civil Aviation Administration!
    4. lonovila
      lonovila 18 October 2015 18: 13 New
      -20
      -Сивков конктретно , доходчиво и корректно объяснил всю неэффективность действий России в Сирии... -Чему это интересно все тут радуются..? -Россия попала в тупик...из которого будет трудно теперь выбраться... -Да и долго так Россия сможет применять всё это дорогое оружие (где его брать) .., а ещё ведь необходимо увеличивать кол-во авиации и бомбардировок... , да ещё осуществлять поставки вооружения и боеприпасов сирийской армии... -Где это всё брать..? -Где средства для этого..? -Китаёзы как всегда устранились от всех "этих дел" и молча наблюдают... -Они даже не хотят "испытать" своё новое вооружение в Сирии... против ИГИЛ... -А может и вовсе... -начнут поставлять "игиловцам" современные средства ПВО (наперегонки с американцами) , чтобы сбивать российские самолёты...
      -Эйфория скоро улетучится... и восторги утихнут... -Как всегда... -"небольшой победоносной войны" у России не получилось... -Пусть кто может... радуется... -Но... в реале ... -всё достаточно трагично...-И наплевать мне на "минусы"...
      1. SSR
        SSR 19 October 2015 03: 23 New
        +2
        1. What kind of victorious is this? In general, the Russian Federation announced a short-term BBO, limited in time
        2. It is the Syrians with the help of Hezbollah and the Iranians must win on earth
        3. About expensive weapons. And what do you think of the Russian Federation cheaper for four years to supply Syria with the Big Landing Ships and other transport was cheap and you can do this for another years?
        4. About delivering a PZRK igil to the Chinese, you are like a goose the fifth point in a puddle, but do you know that there are Chinese people pumping in this igil?

        I can only agree with one of your postulates - the Chinese are on the sidelines. Although there is another point))) the Chinese themselves do not approve of this part of Xi’s policy, they believe that Xi should be more actively involved in the destruction of the igil.
      2. anti-Semite
        anti-Semite 19 October 2015 15: 18 New
        +1
        Do you propose to sit quietly and watch how the bearded having cut Syria will come to us in the Volga region and the Caucasus? Do you understand that there was no choice at all? what is our war and our problems?
    5. Tor5
      Tor5 18 October 2015 22: 17 New
      -4
      Absolutely right and fair!
    6. The comment was deleted.
  2. Coconut Tima
    Coconut Tima 18 October 2015 15: 50 New
    29
    Barmaley had not to dig bunkers and underground passages, but to dig ditches and put up fences from the net - netting!
    1. hrych
      hrych 18 October 2015 16: 09 New
      14
      And this is how our MLRS work, it’s stuffing and roasting Igilov’s twins at the same time ...
      1. hrych
        hrych 18 October 2015 16: 19 New
        +7
        From a different angle, fewer tantrums ...
        1. exalex2
          exalex2 18 October 2015 17: 20 New
          +6
          Burned out .. And for some reason it pleases ..
        2. sanja.grw
          sanja.grw 18 October 2015 18: 38 New
          +1
          This is not an MLRS, but the SUNSETERS bearded in the distance
          1. hrych
            hrych 18 October 2015 19: 18 New
            +3
            Solntsepek and Pinocchio also MLRS. Here the specialists saw Smerch or Hurricane with cluster munitions.
        3. ydjin
          ydjin 19 October 2015 16: 28 New
          +1
          Словно огни светомузыки, -работает "Град"!
      2. Ingvar 72
        Ingvar 72 18 October 2015 19: 10 New
        +6
        Dumb sheep - they allah akbar is mentioned with everything, with a successful hit of the tank, and with the separation of the head from a friend. Zombie.
    2. Persistent
      Persistent 18 October 2015 16: 10 New
      18
      - Why did the Turks decide that they shot down the Russian drone?
      - He sent them three times to @@@ .... laughing
    3. nazar_0753
      nazar_0753 18 October 2015 17: 48 New
      18
      Well, somehow) winked
      1. wk
        wk 18 October 2015 23: 17 New
        +2
        Quote: nazar_0753
        Well, somehow) winked

        Quote: exalex2
        Burned out .. And for some reason it pleases ..

        Quote: sanja.grw
        This is not an MLRS, but the SUNSETERS bearded in the distance

        Quote: Ingvar 72
        Dumb sheep - they allah akbar is mentioned with everything, with a successful hit of the tank, and with the separation of the head from a friend. Zombie.

        Quote: Persistent
        “Why did the Turks decide that it was the Russian UAV that was shot down?” “He sent them three times to @@@ ....

        Quote: nazar_0753
        Well, somehow)


        я просто в "восторге" от интеллектуального уровня целой линейки комментаторов в некогда уважаемом ресурсе Военное Обозрение..... вирус Майдана и Цензор Нет проник!
      2. The comment was deleted.
  3. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 18 October 2015 15: 51 New
    +2
    Вот это эффективность! На "навал" не идут, качество работы не падает. Если сирийцы не подведут, ситуация переломится в течении нескольких недель.
    1. dr.star75
      dr.star75 18 October 2015 16: 07 New
      +6
      No, it will not break. This is for a long time. The USSR with its resources was able to turn the tide only after 2 years, and Syria does not have such reserves. It is a miracle that she has been holding on for 4 years, now there will be success, but in a month the situation will not improve.
      1. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 18 October 2015 16: 12 New
        +4
        Quote: dr.star75
        No, it will not break. This is for a long time. The USSR with its resources was able to turn the tide only after 2 years, and Syria does not have such reserves.

        there the states openly opposed (MANPADS), but here, let's see ...
      2. Mountain shooter
        Mountain shooter 18 October 2015 16: 30 New
        +6
        If compared with Afghanistan, then there were fundamental errors, of a political nature. In a Muslim country, act by the methods of political information and communist ideology. Well, the communist ideology on Islamic seedlings in one generation is not inculcated. And there was time - the cat sneezed. In the present situation - a completely different topic.
        In most wars in the East there is a significant psychologically - mystical component. Even the little Britons knew this well.
  4. Dezinto
    Dezinto 18 October 2015 15: 51 New
    +3
    Ну что-ж такое! Россия продолжает мешать "коалиции" "бороться" с "игил". !!!
  5. cniza
    cniza 18 October 2015 15: 59 New
    +5
    Сейчас "исключительные" вой поднимут и будут убеждать что не тех бомбили , не туда попали , убили мирных жителей т. д.
  6. slizhov
    slizhov 18 October 2015 16: 01 New
    +1
    Eh, to close in one mousetrap, not allowing to leak through the world ...
    1. kil 31
      kil 31 18 October 2015 16: 06 New
      +5
      Quote: slizhov
      Eh, to close in one mousetrap, not allowing to leak through the world ...

      It’s hard to close Turkey. When she is a member of NATO. hi
  7. moskowit
    moskowit 18 October 2015 16: 13 New
    +7
    Действия российской авиации разрушили многолетнее мнение Западного "мира" о России и её Армии, как о "колоссе на глиняных ногах". Столетиями зарубежные "СМИ" вбивали в башку европо-американского обывателя эту байку. Вот поэтому все эти визги, вопли по поводу действий нашей Авиации. Вся эта шолоба, за исключением не большого количества здравомыслящих профессионалов политиков, военных и разведчиков не предполагала такого высокого уровня боевой подготовки пилотов Российской авиации и наличия высокоточного оружия и современнейших систем наведения. Теперь западная "общественность" поняла, как сильна Россия и поэтому такая реакция на происходящее.
    1. tracker
      tracker 19 October 2015 08: 15 New
      0
      согласен, работа ВКС России в Сирии еще и имеет немаловажный фактор сдерживания горячих голов в Вашингтоне по поводу "а не проверить бы нам их в сухопутной операции".
  8. Alexander 3
    Alexander 3 18 October 2015 16: 15 New
    0
    Yeah, but the rats are fleeing to Turkey.
  9. yan 2015
    yan 2015 18 October 2015 16: 21 New
    +1
    I look at the video - and the thought .. blindness is what. on their concrete - our concrete breaker KAB-500.
  10. rf xnumx
    rf xnumx 18 October 2015 16: 26 New
    17
    60 attacks were inflicted by airplanes of the Russian aerospace forces aviation group on positions and infrastructure facilities of militants per day in Syria
    At this time in the Ruin ...
    1. wk
      wk 18 October 2015 23: 23 New
      -4
      Quote: vc 72019
      At this time in the Ruin ...

      статья не про Украину... не про Украину.... сайт называется Военное Обозрение, а не Цензор НЕТ!...туда со своими "смешными" карикатурами!
  11. Nymp
    Nymp 18 October 2015 16: 27 New
    +4
    Помню как либерасты глумились над высказыванием Путина "мочить в сортире" (а укропы до сих пор глумливо ехидничают). Но главное, что слова подтверждаются делом! А притарно сладкие (для матрасников) речи Обамы ничем не подтверждены, кроме обильного слюновыделения.
  12. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 18 October 2015 16: 29 New
    +6
    Turkey is difficult to close, but they have a difficult place, Kurds, who can and should supply weapons. This will distract Turkey from international affairs and return it to domestic politics. They helped us in the Chechen Republic. So they need help.
  13. Evkur
    Evkur 18 October 2015 16: 35 New
    +1
    After the explosion of the Batab500, the Poles will be overtaken by anyone who is in the radius of destruction, at least with a sound wave!
  14. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 18 October 2015 16: 41 New
    -26
    Has anyone opened the first video?
    Why does the cross of the sight stand in one place - the corner of the building,
    and a bomb explosion takes place in a completely different - a clean field
    near the garden plantation?
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 18 October 2015 16: 44 New
      -17
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Has anyone opened the first video?

      I opened and looked.
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Why does the cross of the sight stand in one place - the corner of the building,
      and a bomb explosion takes place in a completely different - a clean field
      near the garden plantation?

      Because past laughing
      1. Uncle
        Uncle 18 October 2015 16: 59 New
        -5
        maybe such accuracy is enough?
      2. ROD VDVshny
        ROD VDVshny 18 October 2015 20: 22 New
        18
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        I opened and looked.

        Where? I look in the book and see a fig? lol
        Why such a fright, this five-copeck earth has a dark background, different from the environment?
        With an increase from the main road to this five-copeck coin, a not very well-worn road is visible. What for? Youngsters went to barbecue with beer and heifers?
        In short ... laughing laughing laughing the crew of the armored train as part of Voyaka and A. Romanov - remove tibiteki, open hatches and ventilate towers soldier
      3. ROD VDVshny
        ROD VDVshny 18 October 2015 20: 38 New
        17
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Because past

        Yah? Watching the next comic wassat
        Смотрите разницу начиная с 3 сек. по 5 сек. Одновременно с взрывом "на пустом поле" появляются три линии выхлопов, практически параллельные друг другу. Опять таки - с какого перебабаха? Думается мне what ... in the bunker it choked.
        And do not be ashamed of you, touvarisch tongue tongue tongue ??
    2. Dezinto
      Dezinto 18 October 2015 16: 49 New
      32
      The plane is bombing and the drone is shooting! Well enough already to find fault with these crosses. Obviously ...
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 18 October 2015 16: 56 New
        -8
        And, I don’t understand ... Usually, whoever bombes, takes off.
        1. Vladimirets
          Vladimirets 18 October 2015 16: 58 New
          31
          Quote: voyaka uh
          Usually, whoever bombes, takes off.

          So you live poorly? smile
          1. Hello
            Hello 18 October 2015 17: 00 New
            -11
            Quote: Vladimirets
            So you live poorly?

            Thank you, your prayers wink.
            1. Aleksey_K
              Aleksey_K 18 October 2015 19: 39 New
              +3
              Quote: Hello
              Quote: Vladimirets
              So you live poorly?

              Thank you, your prayers wink.

              You did not understand him. He hinted that you had planes since the 2-th World War. Then the planes accurately photographed, as a video proof, the results of shooting or bombing. Then the aircraft speeds were very low and the cameras managed to shoot everything.
          2. aleks 62 next
            aleks 62 next 19 October 2015 10: 52 New
            +1
            ... So you live in poverty? ....


            ... Well, why are you picking on a warrior ???? .... Well, the person didn’t understand .... It happens .... In general, he is probably the most adequate of our Israeli comrades ..... wink
        2. Aleksey_K
          Aleksey_K 18 October 2015 19: 35 New
          0
          Quote: voyaka uh
          And, I don’t understand ... Usually, whoever bombes, takes off.

          Самолёт не ждёт, когда цель будет поражена и поэтому никто ничего не снимает. Кроме того при поражении бомбами, самолёт уже далеко от места попадания. После пуска ракет или сброса бомб все лётчики мира автоматически делают противоракетный манёвр. Не сделаешь - собьют. Ни кто не знает, когда самолёт начнут догонять ракеты. И даже если их вроде бы нет, то они могут "вдруг" появиться и тогда уже поздно будет, чуть позже, оправдываться перед Богом, что мол их там не должно было быть.
          1. Professor
            Professor 18 October 2015 19: 48 New
            -11
            Quote: Алексей_К
            The plane does not wait for the target to be hit and therefore no one is taking anything off. In addition, when struck by bombs, the plane is already far from the point of impact.

            I recognize the expert. The plane is far away, but how does it illuminate the target? Telepathy? wassat


            We look, we study:

            1. wk
              wk 18 October 2015 23: 27 New
              +1
              Quote: Professor
              I recognize the expert. The plane is far away, but how does it illuminate the target? Telepathy?

              "политически" не согласен с Профессором но здесь ему плюсую!
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. Aleksey_K
              Aleksey_K 19 October 2015 00: 07 New
              +1
              Quote: Professor
              I recognize the expert. The plane is far away, but how does it illuminate the target? Telepathy?

              Not by telepathy, but by radio electronics, a locator, or a laser. You professor, you should know that the plane does not fly after a bomb or rocket. He fired and then flies, and not at the aiming point. It's that simple, Watson.
              1. Professor
                Professor 19 October 2015 06: 26 New
                -1
                Quote: Алексей_К
                Not by telepathy, but by radio electronics, a locator or a laser.

                How? After all radio electronics, a locator or a laser on an airplane that does not wait for the target to be hit and therefore no one is taking anything off. In addition, when bombed, the aircraft is already far from the place of impact. laughing

                What is it?


                Quote: Алексей_К
                You professor, you should know that the plane does not fly after a bomb or rocket. He fired and then flies, and not at the aiming point. It's that simple, Watson.

                Вы мил человек уже определитесь, ждет самолет пока цель будет поражена или телепатией его подсвечивает. Очень хочется узнать мнение "эксперта".
                1. Aleksey_K
                  Aleksey_K 19 October 2015 08: 41 New
                  +3
                  Quote: Professor
                  Вы мил человек уже определитесь, ждет самолет пока цель будет поражена или телепатией его подсвечивает. Очень хочется узнать мнение "эксперта".

                  And the plane at this time hangs over the target, like a helicopter and waits for the explosion to occur and hangs a little more, it is looking for a new target in the same place
                  Вы "профессор" сами для себя определите, наконец, откуда эти кадры. Самолёт не вертолёт, он в одну секунду пролетает далеко за цель.
                  1. Professor
                    Professor 19 October 2015 14: 10 New
                    +2
                    Quote: Алексей_К
                    And the plane at this time hangs over the target, like a helicopter and waits for the explosion to occur and hangs a little more, it is looking for a new target in the same place

                    Вы глазки то разуйте. Посмотрите еще раз на эту фотографию господин "эксперт", только на этот раз внимательней. Теперь заметили что лазерный дальномер Клен-П размещен в носу самолета, а не в хвосте. Конечно по вашему самолет либо летает задом наперед, либо уже улетел. Умоляю, ответьте как же он подсвечивает цель если The plane does not wait for the target to be hit.

                    Quote: Алексей_К
                    Вы "профессор" сами для себя определите, наконец, откуда эти кадры. Самолёт не вертолёт, он в одну секунду пролетает далеко за цель.

                    Я в отличии вас не "эксперт", а лишь профессор кислух щей изучающий матчасть. Ткнуть вас еще носом в видео где "Самолёт не ждёт, когда цель будет поражена и поэтому никто ничего не снимает. Кроме того при поражении бомбами, самолёт уже далеко от места попадания. После пуска ракет или сброса бомб все лётчики мира автоматически делают противоракетный манёвр" wink
            4. SSR
              SSR 19 October 2015 08: 20 New
              +6
              I did not understand your video and your comment, if you have a plane highlighting and shooting - then it spins like a helicopter and the rocket flies in from the side, in the second video, in general, against the background of swinging trees from the wind. Maybe all the same shooting with a drone?))))
              1. aleks 62 next
                aleks 62 next 19 October 2015 10: 57 New
                +1
                ..... then why it spins like a helicopter and a rocket flies in from the side ...

                .... Yes, everything is simple ..... Option one: two planes - one throws, the other highlights .... Option two: the airplane has a backlight platform with a viewing angle of 360 degrees. on the horizon lol ....
              2. Professor
                Professor 19 October 2015 14: 22 New
                +1
                Quote: SSR
                I did not understand your video and your comment, if you have a plane highlighting and shooting - then it spins like a helicopter and the rocket flies in from the side, in the second video, in general, against the background of swinging trees from the wind. Maybe all the same shooting with a drone?))))

                Not. Shooting from the target designation container. The illusion that the camera freezes, and then suddenly abruptly breaks and takes from another angle precisely from there. Target designation may also be carried out by another aircraft / aircraft.
                1. DarkRiver
                  DarkRiver 19 October 2015 23: 20 New
                  0
                  In Syria, the Russian Aerospace Forces use satellite-guided bombs in 90% of cases, based on this, what video from the aircraft’s aiming system do you want to see? The bomb dropped perhaps 10-15 kilometers from the destination.
            5. McLuha-MacLeod
              McLuha-MacLeod 19 October 2015 09: 04 New
              +1
              Still shooting from a helicopter, already the trees are swinging. so wash yourself!
        3. ver_
          ver_ 20 October 2015 07: 07 New
          0
          .. threw and flew, and the observer recorded the result - either a satellite or a drone whose displacement is minimal ..
      2. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 18 October 2015 16: 56 New
        +3
        Quote: DEZINTO
        The plane is bombing and the drone is shooting!

        Yes, to hell with him from the cross, it also shows that there are buildings and there is a clean field. The bottom line is where the bomb fell.
        1. anti-Semite
          anti-Semite 18 October 2015 20: 57 New
          +2
          and who said that the purpose of the building?
    3. dvina71
      dvina71 18 October 2015 16: 49 New
      15
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Why does the cross of the sight stand in one place


      Because it is not a designator. This is the drone camera sight.

      The fight got where she needed to get .., you just need to destroy the house ..)))
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 18 October 2015 16: 57 New
        +3
        Quote: dvina71
        The fight got to where she needed to get .., you just need to destroy the house ..)

        Fun, and what was next to the house?. In my opinion nothing. That's where the hit was
        1. Vladimirets
          Vladimirets 18 October 2015 17: 00 New
          +9
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          and what was next to the house?. In my opinion nothing.

          "Видео уничтожения underground бункера". Саша, ты указатель хотел увидеть?
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 18 October 2015 17: 10 New
            -14
            Quote: Vladimirets
            "Видео уничтожения подземного бункера".

            Then the question is, how did you find the underground bunker in the open field and where is the guarantee of entry. So I can bring any video under it. I see that they missed, but I don’t understand why this tragedy causes it here.
            1. dvina71
              dvina71 18 October 2015 17: 16 New
              10
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              Then the question is, how did you find the underground bunker in the open field and where is the guarantee of entry.


              Everything is shown in the video .. And hit and bunkers and smoke from adits .. Everything is there. The target is hit.
            2. Vladimirets
              Vladimirets 18 October 2015 17: 18 New
              12
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              how in an open field they found an underground bunker

              The command of the armed forces claims that it draws data from various sources.
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              where is the guarantee of hit.

              Nowhere, I think none of the members of the forum will get into the bodies to count the corpses.
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              So you can summarize any video.

              For overpowering it to another country. smile
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              I see that they missed, but I don’t understand why this tragedy causes here.

              I think that obviously they wouldn’t officially spread the crap raid, all the more so with such a number of sorties there is probably plenty to choose from.
              1. Alexander Romanov
                Alexander Romanov 18 October 2015 17: 22 New
                -7
                Quote: Vladimirets
                The command of the armed forces claims that it draws data from various sources.

                Command can claim to want. I say only what I see with my own eyes.
                Quote: Vladimirets
                Nowhere

                Then talk about getting it makes no sense.
                Quote: Vladimirets
                For overpowering it to another country

                I read comments, and I don’t see much difference with comments from the Censor
                Quote: Vladimirets
                I think that obviously they wouldn’t officially spread the crap raid,

                That's why they laid out that it is not possible to prove anything.
                1. Vladimirets
                  Vladimirets 18 October 2015 17: 32 New
                  0
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  I say, only what I see with my own eyes.

                  I didn’t see that the building was destroyed, so they didn’t hit, right? recourse
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  I do not see much difference with comments from the Censor

                  That's for sure:
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  Command can claim to want.

                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  talking about a hit does not make sense.

                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  That's why they laid out that it is not possible to prove anything.
                2. Aleksey_K
                  Aleksey_K 18 October 2015 19: 43 New
                  +5
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  Command can claim to want. I say only what I see with my own eyes.

                  You don’t see anything, except for some kind of gap. Only he knows that the target is hit or missed, who knows exactly where this goal is.
                3. Garris199
                  Garris199 19 October 2015 01: 04 New
                  +2
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  Then talk about getting it makes no sense.

                  Then talk about a miss also does not make sense.
            3. Saburov
              Saburov 18 October 2015 18: 27 New
              18
              What did you see there? Do you have bunker data? Actually, it’s said to the public that they spotted the bunker with visual control, in fact, it’s the work of the agents and in general, here’s the simplest diagram of the bunker ... as you can see, it is built under the arch and is removed from the building, otherwise it will not come out later ... logic a serious thing, it is either there or not.
            4. Dimas54
              Dimas54 20 October 2015 13: 21 New
              0
              that is, the MOs deliberately upload videos of their misses to the whole world?
        2. morozik
          morozik 18 October 2015 17: 48 New
          +5
          thank God that there IS NOTHING, otherwise you’ll have to tell everything about the couch, oh, and the war will end quickly ... damn, it’s like a site where there should be specialists, but then, looking at my mom’s porridge, it’s a little liquid ... I hate it!
    4. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 18 October 2015 16: 51 New
      10
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Why cross the crosshair

      This is a video from a UAV, which has no side to the bomb except to look.
      1. Armax
        Armax 18 October 2015 18: 03 New
        +7
        But what is the argument about the guys? They beat us not in buildings, but in underground structures.
        In the second half of the video (after the explosion) several outlets of the blast wave from the ground are clearly visible.
        I looked again, at the beginning of the episode, the exits of the explosion (dust) from the ground are also visible to the right of the place where the bomb hit.
      2. Professor
        Professor 18 October 2015 19: 32 New
        -2
        Quote: Vladimirets
        Quote: voyaka uh
        Why cross the crosshair

        This is a video from a UAV, which has no side to the bomb except to look.

        Is the video from the bomber top secret? wink Why not?
        1. shaman2001
          shaman2001 18 October 2015 19: 57 New
          +1
          Why put an additional camera, transmitter on the rocket? Better more fuel!
          1. Professor
            Professor 18 October 2015 20: 03 New
            -4
            Quote: shaman2001
            Why put an additional camera, transmitter on the rocket? Better more fuel!

            And so as not to miss.
            1. Svidetel 45
              Svidetel 45 19 October 2015 00: 15 New
              +2
              Ну блин, зациклился на видео "обязательно с ракеты". Ясно же объяснили, что она, видеокамера, там нужна как телеге 5-е колесо.
            2. SSR
              SSR 19 October 2015 10: 15 New
              +1
              Quote: Professor
              Quote: shaman2001
              Why put an additional camera, transmitter on the rocket? Better more fuel!

              And so as not to miss.

              The plane throws off BoNbu and further dialogue.
              Bonba
              - camera, camera, are you here ?!
              Camera
              - Yes, here I am, admiring the views. Cho need it then?
              Bonba
              Hey friend, look, where am I falling?
              Camera
              You fall into the swamp and what?
              Bonba
              Listen, can you show me where to fly?
              Camera
              - Ides you are in a stump, I’m not showing anyone, I’m showing everything on the Ise tablet
              Bonba
              - hear the bastard, what a pity to show you tell me where to fly? Or finely avenge the fact that the wedding could take off? .....

              It’s time to run to work, and so I was late for two hours))))
        2. Vladimirets
          Vladimirets 18 October 2015 20: 22 New
          +4
          Quote: Professor
          Why not?

          Professor, in the video twice, the camera first zooms in, zooms in, and then it breaks or something? what
          1. Professor
            Professor 18 October 2015 20: 29 New
            +1
            Quote: Vladimirets
            Professor, in the video twice, the camera first zooms in, zooms in, and then it breaks or something?

            The Chinese batteries are dead. bully
            1. Vladimirets
              Vladimirets 18 October 2015 21: 10 New
              +2
              Quote: Professor
              The Chinese batteries are dead.

              Clearly, then you have a problem. yes And yet, people, it’s good to harm innocuous jokes just because the flag is conspicuous. smile
            2. Papakiko
              Papakiko 18 October 2015 21: 40 New
              -1
              Quote: Professor
              The Chinese batteries are dead.

              But what about the concession that in the TSEHAL, the mustache of proper handicraft ???
              Well, and finally everything, Israel’s own factories are built and boiled.
              Quote: Professor
              Is the video from the bomber top secret? Why not?

              (hit on Hamas television station)
              Quote: voyaka uh
              I'm just trying to understand how everything is organized ..

              0.5 Vodka and understanding will begin to come.
              Quote: voyaka uh
              But we are shooting right from the F-16. Under the fuselage
              such a pylon is a designator.
              (blew into the pipe at once to see the spechialist!)
              С БПЛА "Heron, Eitan, Hermes 450, Hermes 900, Hermes 1500" указание у вас ведётся и сьёмка! Pylons of the last century, Mazdai.
    5. dmi.pris
      dmi.pris 18 October 2015 16: 57 New
      +2
      And why do you think this is a sight? Remove from a drone ..
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Has anyone opened the first video?
      Why does the cross of the sight stand in one place - the corner of the building,
      and a bomb explosion takes place in a completely different - a clean field
      near the garden plantation?
    6. novobranets
      novobranets 18 October 2015 17: 14 New
      +5
      This cross is not a sight. This is the center of the drone image from which the survey is being conducted.
    7. niki233
      niki233 18 October 2015 17: 16 New
      +2
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Has anyone opened the first video?
      Why does the cross of the sight stand in one place - the corner of the building,
      and a bomb explosion takes place in a completely different - a clean field
      near the garden plantation?

      because it’s not the cross of the sight, but the center of the shooting of the drone controlling the bombing
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 18 October 2015 17: 25 New
        -2
        " а центр сьёмки беспилотника контролируещего бомбомнтание"///

        That is, the drone does not know in advance where the bomb should go,
        and focuses (with its constant movement) its center of shooting on
        an arbitrary point on the surface?
        And then he notices a bomb explosion and begins to photograph it?
        I'm just trying to understand how everything is organized ...
        1. dvina71
          dvina71 18 October 2015 17: 33 New
          13
          Quote: voyaka uh
          That is, the drone does not know in advance where the bomb should go,

          The drone controls the bombing zone. Only the pilot knows the specific coordinates and the one who gave them these coordinates. In this case, BETAB was bombed. Obviously, the aiming point was not where the camera's sight was looking.
          On some video bombs explode a little away from the target. This is FAB-250/500 bombing, it is even advisable for them to explode not just in the building (because this building will simply collapse and eat all the power of the explosion, but nearby. The blast wave and the front of the fragments will destroy more than one building.
          1. voyaka uh
            voyaka uh 18 October 2015 17: 44 New
            13
            for dvina71:
            Thanks for the clarification. The fact is that we often have the Air Force
            publishes similar videos, they are shown on TV.
            But we are shooting right from the F-16. Under the fuselage
            such a pylon is a designator. He gives a cross, holds the goal
            and the explosion should accurately cover the cross. Therefore, I do not
            figured out.
            1. dvina71
              dvina71 18 October 2015 17: 50 New
              +5
              Quote: voyaka uh
              But we are shooting right from the F-16.


              Vashcheto bombing is conducted from a height of more than 5 km .., the drone from a height of up to 1 km will show the results more clearly ..
              Soviet / Russian aircraft also have means of objective control. The idea of ​​shooting from drones appeared apparently as a response to the predicted wave of desa in the Western media.
            2. Papakiko
              Papakiko 18 October 2015 21: 46 New
              -6
              Quote: voyaka uh
              The fact is that we often have the Air Force
              publishes similar videos, they are shown on telly.

              Here you can see right away, a man EDUCATED-HIGH-AND-NOT-ONCE !!! laughing
              Quote: voyaka uh
              We are shooting right from F-16

              1) The entire film crew sits astride it!
              2) What a pity that there is nothing other than the FU-16 in the Israeli Air Force, to tears! love
          2. tracker
            tracker 19 October 2015 08: 24 New
            0
            most likely even the pilot doesn’t know the specific coordinates, but knows the system for dropping ordinary bombs, and not those controlled by the professor. The pilot simply goes to a given azimuth, the bombs are automatically reset when they reach the reset point. This is the VKS, about which spears were broken on another branch
        2. Papakiko
          Papakiko 18 October 2015 21: 43 New
          +2
          Quote: voyaka uh
          I'm just trying to understand how everything is organized ...

          Little construction boy walked
          Near a huge skating rink
          The boy wanted to look at the system
          Now it can be hung on the wall
    8. maiman61
      maiman61 18 October 2015 17: 30 New
      +3
      A cross is from a drone’s camera, not an airplane’s sight!
    9. Aleksey_K
      Aleksey_K 18 October 2015 19: 28 New
      0
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Has anyone opened the first video?
      Why does the cross of the sight stand in one place - the corner of the building,
      and a bomb explosion takes place in a completely different - a clean field
      near the garden plantation?

      The Department of Defense has already explained. The cross is the place where the camcorder is aimed at a drone flying over the target. The main thing is the picture of the explosion of the target itself. If you hit, it means - hit, if by, then it means - by. This can only be judged by someone who knows where rockets or bombs were supposed to go.
    10. anti-Semite
      anti-Semite 18 October 2015 20: 56 New
      0
      because the cross is the center of the drone frame and not the scope
      1. wk
        wk 18 October 2015 23: 35 New
        +1
        Quote: anti-Semite
        because the cross is the center of the drone frame and not the scope

        in short, in response to the fact that the bombing is not accurate (and it cannot be accurate, because it is carried out by outdated ammunition), they talk about some kind of drones cross .... it turns out that each drone accompanies a drone ..... do not tell .. . speed bomber and reconnaissance. compare drone ...... sorry I write to all of the above posts ... simple you are extreme!
        1. Bongo
          Bongo 19 October 2015 07: 34 New
          +2
          Quote: wk
          in short, in response to the fact that the bombing is not accurate (and it cannot be accurate, because it is carried out by outdated ammunition), they talk about some kind of drones cross ...

          Уверен, те кто в "теме" или просто хочет разобраться какими боеприпасами в основном наносят бомбовые удары Су-24М в Сирии этой фотографии достаточно.
        2. anti-Semite
          anti-Semite 19 October 2015 15: 25 New
          0
          Is KAB obsolete?
      2. The comment was deleted.
  15. Dezinto
    Dezinto 18 October 2015 16: 55 New
    17
    Not at all. Just stupid Russians shoot stupid Russian bombs that don't fly aiming!

    Shoot in Syria and may bomb Kiev! Russians are so always drunk Vatan shto just a nightmare! laughing laughing wassat

    За штурвалами сидят пьяные медведи и играют на балалайках - куда уж там до точечных бомбардировок "коалиции" снайперов, которые полтора года "борются" с террористами!
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 18 October 2015 17: 02 New
      -8
      Quote: DEZINTO
      e. Just stupid Russians shoot stupid Russian bombs that don't fly aiming!

      But I’m blind, I don’t see where the bomb hit huh? Or the point is that not even getting hit is still a hit and something else is not appropriate.
      Damn, I'm sitting on the Censor, no one sees anything at point blank
      1. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky 18 October 2015 17: 36 New
        11
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        But I’m blind, I don’t see where the bomb hit huh? Or the point is that not even getting hit is still a hit and something else is not appropriate.

        Yes, judging by the howls of the United States bombs get where they need to)))
        They are generally smart with us (bombs) -threw and forgot, they themselves find bunkers and CP.
        Merikos also has a cross where it is necessary, and more and more at hospitals and bridal weddings.
      2. Leks69Rus
        Leks69Rus 18 October 2015 17: 48 New
        +6
        Do you think that if the bunker is underground, then it should be located exactly under the house? Is it kind of to make things easier? where is the bunker, but I don’t want to get under that house. The logic is just to make an entrance under some kind of building and dig it to the side, so that even if someone indicates that under this place the bunker will not be known from which side! 2nd, I fully admit that not all objects are struck the first time, poets and not all videos are laid out. I won’t shout that our weapon is a hundred times better than the American one, but it’s sure it performs its task.
        1. VeryBravePiggy
          VeryBravePiggy 18 October 2015 19: 57 New
          +6
          Товарищ, бесполезно что-либо доказывать людям, которые по-умолчанию считают себя мега-экспертами по всему на свете, и заранее знают, что правильно, а что нет. Даже если бы нам показали, что ракета или бомба влетает в окошко подземного бункера, все равно найдутся "спецолизды", с пеной у рта/ обрывая пейсы/ давясь салом (выберите по интересам) начинающие утверждать, что не попали, попали в погреб с капустой, попали в карцер пионерлагеря/секретную пытошную кейджиби, чтобы следы преступлений против прогрессивного человечества замести... При этом, в огромном большинстве случает, эти "спецы" не то что за штурвалом бомбардировщика, а и за обычной турелью не сидели. Про такого зверя, как армейская разведка, им, видимо, также ничего не известно. ГРУ, само собой, пузики поехали на сирийских пляжах греть, а не разведданные собирать и бандгруппы выносить...
  16. Raider
    Raider 18 October 2015 16: 58 New
    31
    Чтобы не говорил и не думали раньше Запад, США и их вассалы, эффективное применение вооруженных сил, а именно авиации поставил их в ступор. Такого не ожидал никто. Если честно сказать даже большая часть населения России не думала, что наша армия имеет такое эффективное оружие и профессиональный бойцов. Если сухопутная армия показала себя в Осетии и 2-ой Чеченской как армия имеющая хороший потенциал. То авиация в последний раз засветиться крупно в ДРА, не считая Осетию (где впервые появились Су-34, но где потери самолетов, включая Ту-22, были ощутимее)Понятно, там были средства ПВО. Но применение в комплексе всех видов разведки и наблюдения (наземная, воздушная, космическая, радиоэлектронная и т.д.) и нанесение точечных ударов с управляемыми боеприпасами авиации и кораблей повергло многих в шок, насколько вырос потенциал ВС РФ. Заставляя одних молиться, других трепетать, а нам гордиться своей армией. Ведь мало нанести удар, подготовка аэродрома, перевозка оборудования, самолетов и вертолетов и т.д. размещение в короткие сроки, изучение, разведка, налаживание связи с союзниками и т.д. сколько народу было задействовано для решения данных вопросов. Ведь только США гордились своими ракетными и авиационными ударами по Югославии, Ираку, а тут на тебе...На фоне этого Украина просто обмерла в ужасе, их просто могут стереть в порошок не заходя на территорию. Ситуация собачки и слона. Лаять можно, но осторожно, а кусать, извините. Рейтинг России не вырос, он скакнул.Долго все дразнили медведя , вот он и рявкнул, да так... Не люблю "шапкозакидательства", наверно есть где что подправить и улучшить, именно в таких условиях пройдет испытание техника и люди, Россия вышла "в свет" и пока на мировом подиуме она безусловно лучшая. Как коллеги с Израиля любят обсасывать арабо-израильскую войну, хвастаясь своей армией и сейчас найдут 1000 причин, чтобы облить нас. Но это мы, это наши - мы можем защищать себя и своих друзей.Как бы не звучало пафосно. Я горд, что я россиянин и горжусь своей армией!
    1. evge-malyshev
      evge-malyshev 18 October 2015 17: 34 New
      +8
      Quote: Raider
      No matter how pathetic. I am proud that I am Russian and proud of my army!
      .

      Although pathetic, but very true. Comment is very optimistic. Hard to say.
    2. evge-malyshev
      evge-malyshev 18 October 2015 17: 34 New
      0
      Quote: Raider
      No matter how pathetic. I am proud that I am Russian and proud of my army!
      .

      Although pathetic, but very true. Comment is very optimistic. Hard to say.
    3. tracker
      tracker 19 October 2015 08: 30 New
      0
      in Ossetia, our aviation, or rather the general staff, went to the fullest, ran into Buki and suffered losses, but were discharged urgently, then not yet adopted by the SU-34, and it quickly extinguished ukronogodyaev with his Buki. So now in Syria there are only 4 of them. but it’s quick enough to extinguish any attempt by amers to use that serious thread against aviation
  17. Denimax
    Denimax 18 October 2015 17: 14 New
    +4
    Mostly freely falling bombs are dropped, this is often seen on airplane suspensions. Therefore, such scatter.
  18. reut.sib
    reut.sib 18 October 2015 17: 38 New
    +1
    The more the dawn, the better. It is a pity that others will replace this!
    1. Ladoga
      Ladoga 18 October 2015 20: 56 New
      0
      So it means - more bombs and missiles need to be done than they will multiply!
  19. Nyrobsky
    Nyrobsky 18 October 2015 17: 39 New
    +2
    Bombs flew at targets, homeless bombers flew to hell, birds flew south - it was autumn)))
  20. The comment was deleted.
  21. Bort radist
    Bort radist 18 October 2015 18: 18 New
    +7
    БДК - "Саратов" и "Николай Фильченков" вошли в Средиземное море. При проходе Босфора на "Саратове" под маскировочными сетями были видны военные грузовики". Из новостей.
  22. starshina pv
    starshina pv 18 October 2015 18: 23 New
    -2
    igil already has a panic, between osobochik begins !!! if we still bomb and ........
  23. The comment was deleted.
  24. KnightRider
    KnightRider 18 October 2015 18: 34 New
    +4
    По моему, наши военные и дипломаты работают в сирийском кризисе выше всяких похвал: успешные действия наших летчиков, открытое освещение результатов бомбардировок, ответное реагирование на пустую критику запада и конструктивная критика наших западу вкупе с предложениями о равноправном сотрудничестве... Всё это дает заметные результаты в положительную сторону и на фронтах боев, и на информационном поле, и в общественном сознании рядовых граждан, в том числе иностранцев: большинство комментариев англоязычных в поддержку России, в ряде городов Европы проходят манифестации в поддержку действий ВКС РФ в Сирии. Конечно, Маккейну и прочим "ястребам" это очень не нравится, особенно на фоне годовалых бомбежек коалицией сирийской пустыни и недавних расстрелов больниц, элетроподстанций, гражданской инфраструктуры, а главное - Б. Ассад не только не терпит крах, но и укрепляет влияние и позиции! Так что "подлянок" всяких со стороны запада можно ждать, но важно нам и самим не плошать... И дай нам всем Бог удачи в борьбе против сил Зла!
  25. Vyacheslav
    Vyacheslav 18 October 2015 18: 39 New
    0
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    Quote: DEZINTO
    e. Just stupid Russians shoot stupid Russian bombs that don't fly aiming!

    But I’m blind, I don’t see where the bomb hit huh? Or the point is that not even getting hit is still a hit and something else is not appropriate.
    Damn, I'm sitting on the Censor, no one sees anything at point blank

    How can one see a disguised object from such a height and with a camera of this resolution?
  26. Denimax
    Denimax 18 October 2015 18: 59 New
    +1
    Quote: maiman61
    A cross is from a drone’s camera, not an airplane’s sight!

    Vidio bombings show aircraft too. Where are the drones?
    1. rererilka
      rererilka 18 October 2015 21: 02 New
      +3
      Quote: Denimax
      Vidio bombings show aircraft too. Where are the drones?

      A drone, he is like a photographer at a village wedding request The photos were printed, but the guy who ran with the camera didn’t have one laughing
  27. Denimax
    Denimax 18 October 2015 19: 29 New
    +3
    Quote: dvina71
    On some video bombs explode a little away from the target. This is FAB-250/500 bombing, it is even advisable for them to explode not just in the building (because this building will simply collapse and eat all the power of the explosion, but nearby. The blast wave and the front of the fragments will destroy more than one building.

    This is if the column is traveling, there the fragmentation effect of the bombs is preferable. And if the building, and no movement around, then the question arises: What is being bombed, and what effect do they want to get?
    1. dvina71
      dvina71 18 October 2015 19: 38 New
      +2
      Quote: Denimax
      What is being bombed, and what effect do they want to get?


      Let's say the house, next to the jeeps with machine guns under a canopy, fuel supplies, weapons, bk .. Well, got into the house .. he collapsed .. bearded men jumped into jeeps and occupied another house ..
      In VKS Variant, it looks like this .. The house is almost intact, detonated, fuel burns, jeeps to dust ..
      Which is better?
      1. Denimax
        Denimax 18 October 2015 20: 05 New
        +2
        It is better to zoom in with optics, if possible, and really see the destruction of the enemy. And so, only explosions are visible, it is not clear where. And the bombing of airplanes speaks for itself, mostly uncontrollable, blunt (with a good shrapnel). Well, it’s not convincing. I would like a result.
    2. Vyacheslav
      Vyacheslav 18 October 2015 19: 45 New
      0
      "НА некоторых видио бомбы взрываются чуть в стороне от цели"
      Where do you get this from? From computer games or something. Why should the target be located in a building that is clearly visible from the same drone? All military facilities are camouflaged, even with ISIS. Disguise is such a thing, thanks to which you can hide from the cameras of drones, etc.
      И еще, кто-то здесь писал, если бы наши промазали, то это видео не выложили на всеобщий просмотр. В противном случае наши "партнеры" уже подняли радостный вой.
      1. dvina71
        dvina71 18 October 2015 20: 06 New
        +2
        Quote: Vyacheslav
        Where do you get this from?


        From the characteristics of FABs and OFOBs
  28. Bort radist
    Bort radist 18 October 2015 19: 38 New
    +1
    Here you can see interesting footage and comments on the passage of ships through the Bosphorus https://twitter.com/YorukIsik
  29. andr327
    andr327 18 October 2015 20: 17 New
    0
    Beat, beat and beat
  30. m-arsenich
    m-arsenich 18 October 2015 20: 25 New
    +1
    Quote: Denimax
    How can one see a disguised object from such a height and with a camera of this resolution?


    Let me remind you if you don’t know: for this there are reconnaissance satellites that probe the thickness of the earth’s surface for homogeneity, otherwise, search not only minerals (civilian satellites), but also dangerous minerals (bunkers, warehouses, factories, etc.). )

    Quote: War and Peace
    военно-космические силы,а причём здесь "космические"


    It is necessary to firmly grasp the slow-witted: not military-space, but AIR-space, i.e. aviation + satellites
    1. Denimax
      Denimax 18 October 2015 21: 07 New
      +1
      These are not my words. Quote correctly!
  31. Siberian
    Siberian 18 October 2015 20: 38 New
    0
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    When they stop smearing, is it really impossible to drop a dozen bombs, for sure.

    And why did you decide. what do they smear? Or. if the bomb fell near the building this is a mistake ... However, it is not always the case.
  32. 1goose3
    1goose3 18 October 2015 20: 59 New
    0
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    When they stop smearing, is it really impossible to drop a dozen bombs, for sure.


    Уважаемый, с чего Вы это взяли ? Если Вы имеете ввиду "крест" на кадрах и что взрывы происходят не в этом перекрестии, то у Вас ошибочное представление. Перекрестие не есть центр прицела, перекрестие есть центр видеокамеры. Здесь вводят в заблуждение наши киношные представления.
  33. mitrich
    mitrich 18 October 2015 21: 01 New
    +2
    The fact that we had such monitoring with UAVs is a big step forward for the Air Force. But still, we are decently behind the USA, Europe and Israel. Even this, as yet short-lived, company of our VKS shows that shock drones are needed. Which in real time, day and night, are searching and destroying tanks, armored personnel carriers, mortar, gun batteries and other shaitan-arb. Well, and the corresponding range of ammunition for them. Then, the cannibals would definitely not be able to tear their stupid little Bosko off the ground.
    PySy: There was a sensational movie, about a year and a half ago, like the Iranians with the help of our Auto Base, they planted a Yusov strike drone. Really, our people couldn’t lure (buy, exchange, steal, .....) him, so that in a quick way, time does not wait, in the style of the Celestial Empire, to make an experimental batch of shock UAVs. Now would be the way. And running in.
    1. Cossack Ermak
      Cossack Ermak 18 October 2015 21: 54 New
      +1
      PySy: There was a sensational movie, about a year and a half ago, like the Iranians with the help of our Auto Base, they planted a Yusov strike drone. Really, our people couldn’t lure (buy, exchange, steal, .....) him, so that in a quick way, time does not wait, in the style of the Celestial Empire, to make an experimental batch of shock UAVs. Now would be the way. And running in.

      Respected. And how do you explain the massive appearance of drones in the Russian troops over the past year? wink Everyone disassembled more than one drone on the cogs
      1. Professor
        Professor 19 October 2015 06: 09 New
        +2
        Quote: Cossack Ermak
        Respected. And how do you explain the massive appearance of drones in the Russian troops over the past year? Everyone disassembled more than one drone on the cogs

        ... or acquired a license from Israel.
        1. Bongo
          Bongo 19 October 2015 07: 38 New
          +2
          Quote: Professor
          ... or acquired a license from Israel.

          Since 2012, the Ural Civil Aviation Plant (UZGA) has begun issuing a licensed copy of the Israeli Searcher-2 UAV - Outpost (pictured).
        2. tracker
          tracker 19 October 2015 08: 34 New
          0
          or bought, Netanyahu did not come to Moscow for nothing
    2. Cat man null
      Cat man null 18 October 2015 22: 08 New
      0
      Just a word:

      Quote: mitrich
      There was a sensational movie, about a year and a half ago, as the Iranians, with the help of our Autobase, planted a Yusov strike drone.

      Motor depot - complex passive локации. "Посадить дрон" он не может просто по определению слова "пассивный".

      http://topwar.ru/82223-kompleks-passivnoy-lokacii-avtobaza-m.html

      And so - yes, there was such a video too ..
      1. mitrich
        mitrich 18 October 2015 22: 29 New
        0
        Cat Man Null, I can not argue with this, not special. I brought something that was gundos on all the media. This is me about Autobase.
  34. ent
    ent 18 October 2015 21: 26 New
    +2
    map with the situation in the SAR from the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, taken from courage
  35. Lena Alena
    Lena Alena 18 October 2015 22: 15 New
    +1
    They have been mobilizing since the age of 14. Now there will be an occasion to scream that children are dying under the bombs.
  36. mitrich
    mitrich 18 October 2015 22: 27 New
    +1
    Quote: Cossack Ermak
    PySy: There was a sensational movie, about a year and a half ago, like the Iranians with the help of our Auto Base, they planted a Yusov strike drone. Really, our people couldn’t lure (buy, exchange, steal, .....) him, so that in a quick way, time does not wait, in the style of the Celestial Empire, to make an experimental batch of shock UAVs. Now would be the way. And running in.

    Respected. And how do you explain the massive appearance of drones in the Russian troops over the past year? wink Everyone disassembled more than one drone on the cogs


    So, the drummer is, in the slightest degree capable of striking in real time is not the same! And all our drones are more reminiscent of the model group of young modellers of the pioneer house. And such drones are capable of riveting a lot of countries that are not a couple to us in other types of weapons. Here we are at the level of the 90s. What a shame.
    1. dvina71
      dvina71 19 October 2015 01: 48 New
      +1
      Quote: mitrich
      So, the drummer is, in the slightest bit capable of delivering blows in real time there is no

      These drones are a target for air defense and even su-25 .. You can only bomb them with the Papuans. The need for such a drone for the RF Armed Forces is not obvious to me. But as a means of detection and control, electronic warfare .. yes for several days .., yes at a distance of several thousand km .. yes, such are needed.
  37. mich
    mich 18 October 2015 22: 53 New
    -1
    Quote: Professor
    We look, we study:

    There is nothing like leather
  38. tyras85
    tyras85 18 October 2015 23: 09 New
    +1
    A decent and stressful number of sorties. Efficiency is undeniable! The main thing is to avoid the loss of our pilots and equipment! I think all the MSS and rescue measures have been taken and are in constant readiness. Good luck, men! We are waiting for all of you and especially NATIVE!
  39. m-arsenich
    m-arsenich 18 October 2015 23: 54 New
    +2
    Quote: Vyacheslav
    How can one see a disguised object from such a height and with a camera of this resolution?


    Let me remind you if you don’t know: for this there are reconnaissance satellites that probe the thickness of the earth’s surface for homogeneity, otherwise, search not only minerals (civilian satellites), but also dangerous minerals (bunkers, warehouses, factories, etc.). )

    Denimaksu: to blame, however hi
  40. atamankko
    atamankko 19 October 2015 00: 24 New
    +2
    The main thing is that our guys all return, they are great.
  41. Denis Skiff
    Denis Skiff 19 October 2015 21: 46 New
    -1
    The Ministry of Defense reports that panic is growing in the ranks of the terrorists.
    Right. There was silence. Kill, rob, kill. And then there is such an unexpected person in the form of bombs and Caliber (2500 range). Sleep well Europe. Do not have to use weapons. Muslims will do everything right. They will find a common language with us Christians. Fortunately, they and we have smart people still full. Sleep calmly pederastic Europe.
  42. Sergey242
    Sergey242 20 October 2015 01: 39 New
    0
    Do not believe those who say that quitting smoking in a week is impossible. There is a special and really working technique that will save you from this addiction in a few days, here dmitrinosov.blogspot.ru link I myself could not quit for a very long time, but this time it really turned out.
  43. radar1967
    radar1967 20 October 2015 04: 13 New
    0
    Крики западных политиков "НЕ ТУДА ПОПАЛИ!" - цитата из известного садо-мазо-группового американского триллера.
  44. Toyvo
    Toyvo 20 October 2015 17: 39 New
    0
    Why the US is killing Syria