Karzai: the presence of foreign troops in Afghanistan only incites terror

According to the ex-president of Afghanistan Hamid Karzai, the presence of a foreign military contingent only aggravates the situation in the country. His words with reference to the Khaama Press leads RIA News.




The statement of the former leader of Afghanistan was made in connection with Washington’s decision to leave the military group in the country after 2016. ).

“The people of Afghanistan 14 years ago agreed to a moderate presence of foreign troops in the hope of eradicating terrorism and maintaining peace in the region. But the presence of foreign troops called counter-terrorism not only did not lead to its eradication, during this period terrorism became even stronger ”
said Karzai.

He noted that the security agreement concluded between Kabul and Washington also "did not lead to a decrease in the level of instability, but, on the contrary, expanded the boundaries of the war, which does not meet the expectations of the Afghans."

The situation in Afghanistan has noticeably deteriorated in recent months: the Taliban, entrenched in the rural areas of the country, launched an offensive against major cities. In September, militants captured Kunduz, and now they are attacking Ghazni, located southwest of Kabul.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

54 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. WE ARE MAKING 18 October 2015 13: 43 New
    • 15
    • 0
    +15
    Let the fox in the chicken coop
    1. Vend 18 October 2015 13: 48 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      Yankees go home. Even Afghanistan kicked the mattresses. Not far off is the time when the chain reaction will begin. Countries will begin to race away from the United States. laughing
      1. Coconut Tima 18 October 2015 13: 54 New
        • 24
        • 0
        +24
        Quote: Wend
        Yankees go home.

        They can't go home. To leave without protection the “golden bottom” - poppy plantations? It is beyond their strength
        1. herruvim 18 October 2015 14: 20 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          USA bring down poshustree home (usa bring down fast home)
        2. Karlovar 18 October 2015 14: 29 New
          • 11
          • 0
          +11
          Drug trafficking is not only gold (money), but also a powerful geopolitical weapon .... With the advent of the striped in Afghanistan, heroin production increased 42 (!) Times, and this infection is going to Russia, partly to Europe .... By the way, shortly before the arrival of American troops in Afghanistan, they (the Americans) were trampled from the Golden Triangle, which before that they controlled and sent drug trafficking to China .... And the Chinese had flooded them from there ... Now the Chinese are monitoring the Golden Triangle drug traffic and send the flow of drugs to the States and Japan mainly (in Japan, the Chinese triads control the lion's share of the drug market by pushing the local yakuza !!!) .... So, the Americans with Afghan drug trafficking simply compensated for the loss of the Golden Triangle ....
        3. 34 region 18 October 2015 20: 44 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          According to USA, this is the only source of income for the peasants! Oh well! Where is the production of products and industry! Surely, USAA from these revenues supports its grant-eaters (they are all out of politics!).
        4. Tor5
          Tor5 18 October 2015 22: 23 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Of course, the drug business is a bonanza!
      2. sanja.grw 18 October 2015 14: 42 New
        • 11
        • 0
        +11
        Yankees go home.

        Yes, they have long got ALL
      3. ssn18 18 October 2015 20: 34 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        "Even Afghanistan kicked the mattresses."

        I would like to ask how?
        As if the "exceptional" decided to stay there and the narrow-film (Ban Ki-moon) supported them.
      4. 34 region 18 October 2015 20: 40 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        I don’t see any kick yet. Ask Afghanistan to the USSR wow! Kick! Ask Afghanistan to Russia today is also a kick. Today, troops and PMCs seem to be present in Afghanistan.
    2. vovanpain 18 October 2015 13: 48 New
      • 16
      • 0
      +16
      Well, your Mr. Karzai and the Afghans have deteriorated, and the American drug dealers have improved markedly, not to leave the gerych to the Afghans.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. avt
        avt 18 October 2015 14: 54 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: vovanpain
        Mr. Karzai

        And what is it that he suddenly jumped up then? Reluctance to go back to the states to drive a restaurant? Well, from that where the Yankees pulled him out of the position of prezik. He wants to steer again?
    3. Finches 18 October 2015 13: 48 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      When there were no troops, then there was the Taliban! Therefore, Karzai must completely agree on his idea - the irresponsible actions of the troops of the Western coalition led by the Anglo-Saxons lead to terrorism!
      True, this is what the Anglo-Saxons need in order to have their troops in this region for as long as possible!
      1. MIKHAN 18 October 2015 13: 53 New
        • 12
        • 0
        +12
        Quote: Finches
        When there were no troops, then there was the Taliban! Therefore, Karzai must completely agree on his idea - the irresponsible actions of the troops of the Western coalition led by the Anglo-Saxons lead to terrorism!
        True, this is what the Anglo-Saxons need in order to have their troops in this region for as long as possible!

        Well, that's right ...! Russia will not come to Afghanistan, he himself must kick the devils out! And how to run to the borders .. We will clean! bully
        1. 34 region 18 October 2015 21: 10 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          It became scary to live terribly! He is everywhere this Putin! He got to Alaska, raised the flag of the Russian Gad! He runs into the states, that's what a bastard he is! He raised his voice to the UN, well, what a gon ... he! How can it be an honor to defend Russia in this world! Better we lie down under the states, nothing that stripes but they live richly! It’s better to serve the master than to live free! (prayer of free Europe)
      2. Maxom75 18 October 2015 14: 05 New
        • 9
        • 0
        +9
        Karzai is also a peculiar type, while the Americans dumped him money, he thanked and supported them, when the Americans found an alternative to him, he began to criticize them and blame them for all troubles. You should not trust his words. If the Americans withdraw their troops, then the Taliban and ISIS will kill all of Afghanistan in a couple of months, and then the south of the CIS will burn, and here we will have to fight. Maybe it’s worth supporting Obama, let him delay the amers in Agan, and the Taliban will fight with them. We will have a handicap in time to prepare.
        1. Baikonur 18 October 2015 14: 16 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          I agree about Karzai, he is a protege of the United States, and he will prostitute (barks as they need) as well as their other mongrels, ...
          Quote: Maxom75
          We will have a handicap in time to prepare.
          And the handicap will grow in number by reducing their numbers!
        2. Steppe 18 October 2015 14: 59 New
          • 6
          • 0
          +6
          ISIS gave birth to the Americans. And they gave birth specifically, so that there was someone to attack Russia from the south and arrange massive terrorist activities in our country. We don’t go out to the Maidan with posters, we don’t make a mess in our country to our delight in our country. So they need terrorists in our country as air, so that we can bring chaos and chaos in our country. To make it easier for them to attack. Russia successfully wets terrorists in Syria and the United States is not at all happy about this. So they decided to create a new hornet's nest of terrorists in Afghanistan. There will be no Afghanistan - they will choose some Muslim republic from among the former republics of the USSR. So this time I believe Hamid Karzai.
        3. Vladimir 1964 18 October 2015 16: 22 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Maxom75
          Karzai is also a peculiar type, while the Americans dumped him money, he thanked and supported them, when the Americans found an alternative to him, he began to criticize them and blame them for all troubles. You should not trust his words. If the Americans withdraw their troops, then the Taliban and ISIS will kill all of Afghanistan in a couple of months, and then the south of the CIS will burn, and here we will have to fight. Maybe it’s worth supporting Obama, let him delay the amers in Agan, and the Taliban will fight with them. We will have a handicap in time to prepare.


          I liked your comment, Dear Mikhail, no matter how paradoxical this will look, but at the moment, it’s really beneficial for us to some extent to find the Americans in Afghanistan. For without their presence, the territory of Afghanistan will turn into "another ISIS", the Afghans themselves will not hold real power. Therefore, of the two evils, drugs and terrorism, from the territory of Afghanistan, we will have to choose the lesser - drugs.

          Something like that thought. hi
          1. 34 region 18 October 2015 21: 24 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            What is the benefit brother! Before amers, and, after their arrival? Does the Soviet contingent mean fu? Are the Americans well done?
            1. Vladimir 1964 19 October 2015 02: 52 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: 34 region
              What is the benefit brother


              And less expensive in human and financial terms. Afghanistan is currently torn out of the peaceful course of life for many years, including civil strife, plus all these terrorist movements, for which Afghanistan is "the promised land." And the presence of the Americans there, at least, will not allow all of this to spill openly to our borders, otherwise Russia will again have to restore order in the Asian countries of the CSTO.

              Well, such an opinion, Dear 34 region. hi
        4. 34 region 18 October 2015 21: 21 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          US troops are international police. Military bases, police stations. The police are either fighting or roofing. In this case, the roof. Roofs in the interests of a particular power. Or not?
          1. Vladimir 1964 19 October 2015 02: 57 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: 34 region
            US troops are international police. Military bases, police stations. The police are either fighting or roofing. In this case, the roof. Roofs in the interests of a particular power. Or not?


            No, it’s all so, Dear 34 region, but in any case, the Americans will, involuntarily or forcibly, have to restore some sort of order in Afghanistan, even if only because of the “preservation of the face of the muzzle of the roof”.

            Well, something like this, again subjectively thought. hi
      3. Karlovar 18 October 2015 14: 54 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Not only the army, but also have drug trafficking, targeted at the Russian Federation and the EU! ....
      4. 34 region 18 October 2015 20: 54 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Oh well! Having troops in this region is not an end in itself. What is the benefit of this? But the protection of plantations and the share of the gyrych trade is yes! A weighty argument. Given that the money goes to fight competitors on a geopolitical scale, yes! The benefit is significant. After all, fair competition! The strongest survives (the smartest, most cunning, dodgy). Indeed, according to the logic of capitalism !?
    4. dmi.pris 18 October 2015 14: 24 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Karzai, you bastard, you let them in ....
      Quote: AGAIN
      Let the fox in the chicken coop
      1. Firstvanguard 18 October 2015 16: 02 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: dmi.pris
        Karzai, you bastard, you let them in ....

        He didn’t let anyone in, or rather no one asked him, the murakantos came because they wanted to. And they also planted this clown, now he is sad, so he doesn’t call anyone. So a heightened sense of justice and a fountain of truth awoke. While he lived beautifully, he served as vice chairman, was silent in a rag, everything was fine. Well, sometimes declared, what mattresses say.
    5. tilovaykrisa 18 October 2015 15: 28 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      He is waiting for the fate of Taraki for he sold his people for candy wrappers
  2. Vladimyrych 18 October 2015 13: 43 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    Karzai with you, these troops appeared there. Would be silent already.
    1. Rader 18 October 2015 14: 12 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      While Karzai was president, it was impossible for him to sweeten not a single harsh word about America or their NATO allies. Only at the end of his presidential term did he suddenly begin to say that the United States was ... er ... bad at war with terrorism, and in general, they had no place in sovereign Afghanistan! So, what do you see: while a person is at the feeding trough, everything that the breadwinner does is seen in bright colors. - law of nature wink
    2. Karlovar 18 October 2015 14: 56 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      First there was an army, then Karzai ...
    3. Vladimir 1964 18 October 2015 19: 02 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Vladimir
      Karzai with you, these troops appeared there


      Probably more correct, Dear Maxim, will say that he (Karzai) has come with the Americans.

      Something like this. hi
  3. Dezinto 18 October 2015 13: 45 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    As they put it, they’ll remove it quickly ..... otherwise I’ve got into a conversation.

    1. Vladimir 1964 18 October 2015 19: 04 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: DEZINTO
      As they put it, they’ll remove it quickly ..... otherwise I’ve got into a conversation.


      Nikolay, so it’s been removed a long time ago.

      Something like this. hi
  4. Thronekeeper 18 October 2015 13: 49 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Well, in principle, it is. The United States and Arabia created the Taliban, and then the megangarkomafiya, and of course, the drug dealer Karzai will not share CIA grants with the Taliban terrorists. Like Somali pirates with the Islamists, Somalia could not agree what to shout at the beginning: “Allahu akbar” or “give the loot”.
  5. roskot 18 October 2015 13: 50 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Karzai can claim, only they have spit on these statements.
  6. igor1981 18 October 2015 13: 50 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    That's right, where the mattress covers with their “democracy” appear, chaos, terror and devastation appear there.
  7. Gomunkul 18 October 2015 13: 52 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    “The people of Afghanistan 14 years ago agreed to a moderate presence of foreign troops in the hope of eradicating terrorism and maintaining peace in the region. But the presence of foreign troops called counter-terrorism not only did not lead to its eradication, during this period terrorism became even stronger ”
    There is no oil in Afghanistan, but opium poppy grows well there.
    The General Staff of Russia believes that the growth of opium production in Afghanistan this year may reach about 20% compared to 2014. Thus, the volume of opium produced in the country this year will reach 8 thousand tons.

    "Over the past 14 years, the volume of drugs produced (in Afghanistan. -" Gazeta.Ru ") has grown 40 times, and the amount of opium received in the current year can reach 8 thousand tons, which will exceed 20% last year," said General Staff Chief General Valery Gerasimov, quoted by TASS.
    Earlier, Gerasimov said that the General Staff estimates the number of militants on the territory of Afghanistan as the Islamic State terrorist organization banned in Russia at 2-3 thousand people.
    In mid-September, the Russian representative to the UN, Vitaly Churkin, reported that IG fighters were trying to take control of drug trafficking from Afghanistan and already controlled part of the drug supply channels from Badakhshan province.
    1. Gomunkul 18 October 2015 14: 00 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Another interesting chart for Afghanistan.
    2. Karlovar 18 October 2015 15: 00 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      An army in Afghanistan is also needed to protect drug trafficking ... but not only .... After all, the Taliban fought against the drug trade ... If the American army leaves, the Taliban will come, the end of drug trafficking ...
  8. pts-m 18 October 2015 13: 52 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    whoever doubts what has been said. but gerych brings fabulous profits to Amer’s masters. The dekhanes themselves are only slaves of these masters. If the Americans leave there, then the cancer on the mountain will whistle like this harzai.
    1. kil 31 18 October 2015 14: 02 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Does he really want to be in the president’s chair again? Then he was put by the USA and he led the rhetoric of the USA well. Talliban is bad. Right now, the US rhetoric is bad. He probably has now become a presidential candidate from Talliban.
  9. Alexander 3 18 October 2015 14: 01 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    If the mattresses leave Afghanistan, who will protect the drug and get grandmothers.
  10. tatarin_ru 18 October 2015 14: 02 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    I think that he decided that it is better to negotiate with the Taliban than with mattresses, and this is a US protege.
  11. yan 2015
    yan 2015 18 October 2015 14: 12 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    trust the goat with cabbage. so with these horned ones from NATO.
  12. Ze Kot 18 October 2015 14: 15 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Oooh ... whose voice erupted ...
  13. slaw14 18 October 2015 14: 18 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    As they put it, they’ll take it off quickly ..... otherwise I’ve got into a conversation
    ... but this is a protege of the USA
    .

    Already removed last year, the current president is Ashraf.
  14. Mountain shooter 18 October 2015 14: 20 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Is Afghan the main source of heroin on the planet now? Is not it so? The mattresses “correctly” used their presence there. You can’t burn them out with hot iron from there now.
  15. MIKHAN 18 October 2015 14: 28 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    We tried to make the Afghan life normal ... as we could! hi
    1. Zumich 18 October 2015 15: 36 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      drinks you did it honestly.
  16. lwxx 18 October 2015 14: 37 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Karzai got his opinion?
    1. Karlovar 18 October 2015 15: 10 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Putin, too, did not immediately voice his opinion in 2000! The Americans hoped that Putin would do their will (like Boriska), and for the sake of fidelity they immediately showed him his strength (the sinking of the Kursk, Second Chechen), look they say who is the boss in the house .... It didn’t help in the end ... .
    2. ALEA IACTA EST 18 October 2015 16: 28 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      All of them "see" only when the prefix "ex" is added to their position.
  17. iliitchitch 18 October 2015 14: 53 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    "Rural areas of the country?" . Are there industrial ones? My rake in the country laughed.
  18. boris-1230 18 October 2015 14: 55 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The vaunted American presence only exacerbates the situation. Soon, all troubled countries will turn to Russia for help, because there is none from the US and NATO, cover for their interests and nothing more.
  19. sw6513 18 October 2015 15: 00 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    There is nothing besides opium. Americans help with the export and sale, a lot of money.
    1. iliitchitch 18 October 2015 19: 52 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Forty times (!) Afghan drug trafficking after the American warriors increased. Just a thing. AND? If you do not sentence villains, then what kind of bolt ??? A man, maybe your son, your daughter use this muck, is it time to decide the topic?
  20. propolsky 18 October 2015 15: 13 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The melancholy is green, And the saddest thing is that it is next to us ...
  21. anti-Semite 18 October 2015 15: 28 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Karzai did not have real power as president, and now all the more so that it’s empty talk, and as for the Amers, let them sit in Afghanistan, the British Empire and the USSR have sat up and the states have stayed, Afghanistan is a bad place
  22. slizhov 18 October 2015 16: 04 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Karzai has long understood what the Pentagon is.
    That is why the USA hastened to replace it.
    The Yankees love to dangle their feet for ages for decades, and then use their claws for fishing.
  23. cniza 18 October 2015 16: 16 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    The United States will do everything to continue drug trafficking to Russia and continue military tensions almost at our borders. And Karzai apparently realized that they would not renew the “contract” with him, and one could reason.
  24. Very old 18 October 2015 16: 52 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: coconut tim
    Quote: Wend
    Yankees go home.

    They can't go home. To leave without protection the “golden bottom” - poppy plantations? It is beyond their strength


    Yes you...
    Refuse drug addiction? We turn everything that is dirty into green
  25. afrikanez 18 October 2015 17: 40 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    But is it impossible to terminate the security agreement. Well this is not bondage, after all. Tolley do not want to, or can no longer, either oppose the United States?
  26. starshina pv 18 October 2015 18: 11 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Yes, damn it, what is needed there !!!! one hundred years too war !!! the Aghans would ask, what do they need? or do not need anything other than drugs ????
  27. alone 18 October 2015 19: 42 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    He himself came to power on the bayonets of foreign troops, and now says that foreign troops contribute to terrorism)) he finally regained his sight.)))
  28. Lelek 18 October 2015 19: 47 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    (the presence of foreign troops called the fight against terrorism not only did not lead to its eradication, during this period terrorism became even stronger)

    He took and OPEN America. According to statistics from international anti-drug organizations, drug production in Afghanistan has increased 2003-fold since 7. Afghanistan annually produces drugs worth $ 60 billion. 40% of this money ($ 24 billion) is deposited in Afghanistan itself, 30% ($ 18 billion) is deposited in the pockets of the international drug mafia and 30% ($ 18 billion) is on the accounts of intermediaries and the “roof” , which are the citizens of the most democratic, most God-given country on Earth - the United States. This is the situation, gentlemen, comrades. And why not organize and support a mess in the Old World, the Middle East, Africa and the post-Soviet space for these $ 18 billion? AND? yes
  29. ssn18 18 October 2015 20: 39 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    "According to ex-president of Afghanistan Hamid Karzai"

    Well, the ex-president of the USSR also grinds a lot of things, but who is now interested in it.
    IMHO: It would be better to shut up this Stavropol combiner.
  30. Wolka 19 October 2015 05: 28 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Korzai, of course, is bluffing, sooner or later the Yankees will leave anyway, but Karzai will not be, Afghanistan will face big changes, well, such a country cannot be so long in feudal stagnation of political and economic, many of the Afghans began to realize that at one time they tried to to bring the USSR, he sees what Russia is today, but the Muslim clerical elite does not want to give power to secular hands, because the Taliban are again raising their heads ...
  31. radogos 19 October 2015 08: 04 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    WHERE WILL THE EARTH BE WEARING THESE PARASITES ???