Karzai: the presence of foreign troops in Afghanistan only incites terror

54
According to the ex-president of Afghanistan Hamid Karzai, the presence of a foreign military contingent only aggravates the situation in the country. His words with reference to the Khaama Press leads RIA News.



The statement of the former leader of Afghanistan was made in connection with Washington’s decision to leave the military group in the country after 2016. ).

“The people of Afghanistan 14 years ago agreed to a moderate presence of foreign troops in the hope of eradicating terrorism and maintaining peace in the region. But the presence of foreign troops called counter-terrorism not only did not lead to its eradication, during this period terrorism became even stronger ”
said Karzai.

He noted that the security agreement concluded between Kabul and Washington also "did not lead to a decrease in the level of instability, but, on the contrary, expanded the boundaries of the war, which does not meet the expectations of the Afghans."

The situation in Afghanistan has noticeably deteriorated in recent months: the Taliban, entrenched in the rural areas of the country, launched an offensive against major cities. In September, militants captured Kunduz, and now they are attacking Ghazni, located southwest of Kabul.
  • http://www.globallookpress.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

54 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +15
    18 October 2015 13: 43
    Let the fox in the chicken coop
    1. +8
      18 October 2015 13: 48
      Yankees go home. Even Afghanistan kicked the mattresses. Not far off is the time when the chain reaction will begin. Countries will begin to race away from the United States. laughing
      1. +24
        18 October 2015 13: 54
        Quote: Wend
        Yankees go home.

        They can't go home. Leave the "gold mine" unprotected - poppy plantations? It's beyond their power
        1. +4
          18 October 2015 14: 20
          USA bring down poshustree home (usa bring down fast home)
        2. +11
          18 October 2015 14: 29
          Drug trafficking is not only gold (money), but also a powerful geopolitical weapon ... With the arrival of the striped in Afghanistan, the production of heroin increased 42 (!) Times, and this infection goes to Russia, partly to Europe ... By the way, shortly before the arrival of the American troops in Afghanistan, they (the Americans) were pushed out of the "Golden Triangle", which they had previously controlled and sent drug traffic to China .... And the Chinese had pushed them out of there ... Now the Chinese control drug traffic in the "Golden Triangle" and send them the flow of drugs to the States and Japan is mainly (in Japan, the Chinese triads control the lion's share of the drug market, pushing the local yakuza !!!) .... So, the Americans simply compensated for the loss of the "Golden Triangle" with the Afghan drug traffic ....
        3. 0
          18 October 2015 20: 44
          According to USA, this is the only source of income for the peasants! Oh well! Where is the production of products and industry! Surely, USAA from these revenues supports its grant-eaters (they are all out of politics!).
        4. Tor5
          0
          18 October 2015 22: 23
          Of course, the drug business is a bonanza!
      2. +11
        18 October 2015 14: 42
        Yankees go home.

        Yes, they have long got ALL
      3. +2
        18 October 2015 20: 34
        "Even Afghanistan kicked the mattress mats."

        I would like to ask how?
        As if the "exceptional" decided to stay there and the narrow-film (Ban Ki-moon) supported them.
      4. 0
        18 October 2015 20: 40
        I don’t see any kick yet. Ask Afghanistan to the USSR wow! Kick! Ask Afghanistan to Russia today is also a kick. Today, troops and PMCs seem to be present in Afghanistan.
    2. +16
      18 October 2015 13: 48
      Well, your Mr. Karzai and the Afghans have deteriorated, and the American drug dealers have improved markedly, not to leave the gerych to the Afghans.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. avt
        +2
        18 October 2015 14: 54
        Quote: vovanpain
        Mr. Karzai

        And what is it that he suddenly jumped up then? Reluctance to go back to the states to drive a restaurant? Well, from that where the Yankees pulled him out of the position of prezik. He wants to steer again?
    3. +7
      18 October 2015 13: 48
      When there were no troops, then there was the Taliban! Therefore, Karzai must completely agree on his idea - the irresponsible actions of the troops of the Western coalition led by the Anglo-Saxons lead to terrorism!
      True, this is what the Anglo-Saxons need in order to have their troops in this region for as long as possible!
      1. +12
        18 October 2015 13: 53
        Quote: Finches
        When there were no troops, then there was the Taliban! Therefore, Karzai must completely agree on his idea - the irresponsible actions of the troops of the Western coalition led by the Anglo-Saxons lead to terrorism!
        True, this is what the Anglo-Saxons need in order to have their troops in this region for as long as possible!

        Well, that's right ...! Russia will not come to Afghanistan, he himself must kick the devils out! And how to run to the borders .. We will clean! bully
        1. +2
          18 October 2015 21: 10
          It became scary to live terribly! He is everywhere this Putin! He got to Alaska, raised the flag of the Russian Gad! He runs into the states, that's what a bastard he is! He raised his voice to the UN, well, what a gon ... he! How can it be an honor to defend Russia in this world! Better we lie down under the states, nothing that stripes but they live richly! It’s better to serve the master than to live free! (prayer of free Europe)
      2. +9
        18 October 2015 14: 05
        Karzai is also a peculiar type, while the Americans dumped him money, he thanked and supported them, when the Americans found an alternative to him, he began to criticize them and blame them for all troubles. You should not trust his words. If the Americans withdraw their troops, then the Taliban and ISIS will kill all of Afghanistan in a couple of months, and then the south of the CIS will burn, and here we will have to fight. Maybe it’s worth supporting Obama, let him delay the amers in Agan, and the Taliban will fight with them. We will have a handicap in time to prepare.
        1. +2
          18 October 2015 14: 16
          I agree about Karzai, he is a protege of the United States, and he will prostitute (barks as they need) as well as their other mongrels, ...
          Quote: Maxom75
          We will have a handicap in time to prepare.
          And the handicap will grow in number by reducing their numbers!
        2. +6
          18 October 2015 14: 59
          ISIS gave birth to the Americans. And they gave birth specifically, so that there was someone to attack Russia from the south and arrange massive terrorist activities in our country. We don’t go out to the Maidan with posters, we don’t make a mess in our country to our delight in our country. So they need terrorists in our country as air, so that we can bring chaos and chaos in our country. To make it easier for them to attack. Russia successfully wets terrorists in Syria and the United States is not at all happy about this. So they decided to create a new hornet's nest of terrorists in Afghanistan. There will be no Afghanistan - they will choose some Muslim republic from among the former republics of the USSR. So this time I believe Hamid Karzai.
        3. +2
          18 October 2015 16: 22
          Quote: Maxom75
          Karzai is also a peculiar type, while the Americans dumped him money, he thanked and supported them, when the Americans found an alternative to him, he began to criticize them and blame them for all troubles. You should not trust his words. If the Americans withdraw their troops, then the Taliban and ISIS will kill all of Afghanistan in a couple of months, and then the south of the CIS will burn, and here we will have to fight. Maybe it’s worth supporting Obama, let him delay the amers in Agan, and the Taliban will fight with them. We will have a handicap in time to prepare.


          I liked your comment, Dear Mikhail, no matter how paradoxical it may look, but at the moment it is really beneficial for us to find the Americans in Afghanistan. For without their presence, the territory of Afghanistan will turn into "another ISIS," the Afghans themselves will not retain real power. Therefore, out of two evils, drugs and terrorism, from the territory of Afghanistan, we will have to choose the smaller one - drugs.

          Something like that thought. hi
          1. +1
            18 October 2015 21: 24
            What is the benefit brother! Before amers, and, after their arrival? Does the Soviet contingent mean fu? Are the Americans well done?
            1. 0
              19 October 2015 02: 52
              Quote: Region 34
              What is the benefit brother


              And it is less costly in human and financial terms. Afghanistan is currently torn from the peaceful course of life for many years, including civil strife, plus all these terrorist currents for which Afghanistan is the "promised land." And the presence of the Americans there, at least, will not allow all this to spill over into our borders in an open form, otherwise Russia will have to restore "order" in the Asian countries of the CSTO.

              Well, such an opinion, Dear 34 region. hi
        4. +1
          18 October 2015 21: 21
          US troops are international police. Military bases, police stations. The police are either fighting or roofing. In this case, the roof. Roofs in the interests of a particular power. Or not?
          1. 0
            19 October 2015 02: 57
            Quote: Region 34
            US troops are international police. Military bases, police stations. The police are either fighting or roofing. In this case, the roof. Roofs in the interests of a particular power. Or not?


            No, of course everything is so, Dear 34 region, but in any case, the Americans, willingly or unwillingly, will have to impose any order in Afghanistan, even if because of the "preservation of the face of the roof."

            Well, something like this, again subjectively thought. hi
      3. +3
        18 October 2015 14: 54
        Not only the army, but also have drug trafficking, targeted at the Russian Federation and the EU! ....
      4. 0
        18 October 2015 20: 54
        Oh well! Having troops in this region is not an end in itself. What is the benefit of this? But the protection of plantations and the share of the gyrych trade is yes! A weighty argument. Given that the money goes to fight competitors on a geopolitical scale, yes! The benefit is significant. After all, fair competition! The strongest survives (the smartest, most cunning, dodgy). Indeed, according to the logic of capitalism !?
    4. +1
      18 October 2015 14: 24
      Karzai, you bastard, you let them in ....
      Quote: AGAIN
      Let the fox in the chicken coop
      1. +4
        18 October 2015 16: 02
        Quote: dmi.pris
        Karzai, you bastard, you let them in ....

        He didn’t let anyone in, or rather no one asked him, the murakantos came because they wanted to. And they also planted this clown, now he is sad, so he doesn’t call anyone. So a heightened sense of justice and a fountain of truth awoke. While he lived beautifully, he served as vice chairman, was silent in a rag, everything was fine. Well, sometimes declared, what mattresses say.
    5. +1
      18 October 2015 15: 28
      He is waiting for the fate of Taraki for he sold his people for candy wrappers
  2. +8
    18 October 2015 13: 43
    Karzai with you, these troops appeared there. Would be silent already.
    1. +2
      18 October 2015 14: 12
      While Karzai was president, it was impossible for him to sweeten not a single harsh word about America or their NATO allies. Only at the end of his presidential term did he suddenly begin to say that the United States was ... er ... bad at war with terrorism, and in general, they had no place in sovereign Afghanistan! So, what do you see: while a person is at the feeding trough, everything that the breadwinner does is seen in bright colors. - law of nature wink
    2. +2
      18 October 2015 14: 56
      First there was an army, then Karzai ...
    3. 0
      18 October 2015 19: 02
      Quote: Vladimir
      Karzai with you, these troops appeared there


      Probably more correct, Dear Maxim, will say that he (Karzai) has come with the Americans.

      Something like this. hi
  3. +5
    18 October 2015 13: 45
    As they put it, they’ll remove it quickly ..... otherwise I’ve got into a conversation.

    1. 0
      18 October 2015 19: 04
      Quote: DEZINTO
      As they put it, they’ll remove it quickly ..... otherwise I’ve got into a conversation.


      Nikolay, so it’s been removed a long time ago.

      Something like this. hi
  4. +2
    18 October 2015 13: 49
    Well, in principle, it is. The USA and Arabia created the Taliban, and then the mega-car mafia, and naturally, the drug dealer Karzai will not share the CIA grants with the Taliban terrorists. As the Somali pirates with the Islamists of Somalia could not agree on what to shout at the beginning: "Allah akbar" or "give the loot."
  5. +2
    18 October 2015 13: 50
    Karzai can claim, only they have spit on these statements.
  6. +3
    18 October 2015 13: 50
    That's right, where mattress mats appear with their own "democracy", there appears chaos, terror and devastation.
  7. +3
    18 October 2015 13: 52
    “The people of Afghanistan 14 years ago agreed to a moderate presence of foreign troops in the hope of eradicating terrorism and maintaining peace in the region. But the presence of foreign troops called counter-terrorism not only did not lead to its eradication, during this period terrorism became even stronger ”
    There is no oil in Afghanistan, but opium poppy grows well there.
    The General Staff of Russia believes that the growth of opium production in Afghanistan this year may reach about 20% compared to 2014. Thus, the volume of opium produced in the country this year will reach 8 thousand tons.

    "Over the past 14 years, the volume of drugs produced (in Afghanistan. -" Gazeta.Ru ") has grown 40 times, and the amount of opium received in the current year can reach 8 thousand tons, which will exceed 20% last year," said General Staff Chief General Valery Gerasimov, quoted by TASS.
    Earlier, Gerasimov said that the General Staff estimates the number of militants on the territory of Afghanistan as the Islamic State terrorist organization banned in Russia at 2-3 thousand people.
    In mid-September, the Russian representative to the UN, Vitaly Churkin, reported that IG fighters were trying to take control of drug trafficking from Afghanistan and already controlled part of the drug supply channels from Badakhshan province.
    1. +1
      18 October 2015 14: 00
      Another interesting chart for Afghanistan.
    2. +1
      18 October 2015 15: 00
      An army in Afghanistan is also needed to protect drug trafficking ... but not only .... After all, the Taliban fought against the drug trade ... If the American army leaves, the Taliban will come, the end of drug trafficking ...
  8. +2
    18 October 2015 13: 52
    whoever doubts what has been said. but gerych brings fabulous profits to Amer’s masters. The dekhanes themselves are only slaves of these masters. If the Americans leave there, then the cancer on the mountain will whistle like this harzai.
    1. +1
      18 October 2015 14: 02
      Does he really want to be in the president’s chair again? Then he was put by the USA and he led the rhetoric of the USA well. Talliban is bad. Right now, the US rhetoric is bad. He probably has now become a presidential candidate from Talliban.
  9. +2
    18 October 2015 14: 01
    If the mattresses leave Afghanistan, who will protect the drug and get grandmothers.
  10. +2
    18 October 2015 14: 02
    I think that he decided that it is better to negotiate with the Taliban than with mattresses, and this is a US protege.
  11. yan 2015
    +1
    18 October 2015 14: 12
    trust the goat with cabbage. so with these horned ones from NATO.
  12. +1
    18 October 2015 14: 15
    Oooh ... whose voice erupted ...
  13. +1
    18 October 2015 14: 18
    As they put it, they’ll take it off quickly ..... otherwise I’ve got into a conversation
    ... but this is a protege of the USA
    .

    Already removed last year, the current president is Ashraf.
  14. +2
    18 October 2015 14: 20
    Is Afghan the main source of heroin on the planet now? Is not it so? The mattress toppers used their presence there "correctly". Now you can't burn them out with a red-hot iron.
  15. +6
    18 October 2015 14: 28
    We tried to make the Afghan life normal ... as we could! hi
    1. +2
      18 October 2015 15: 36
      drinks you did it honestly.
  16. +3
    18 October 2015 14: 37
    Karzai got his opinion?
    1. +2
      18 October 2015 15: 10
      Putin, too, did not voice his opinion immediately, in 2000! The Americans hoped that Putin would fulfill their will (like Boriska), and for loyalty they immediately demonstrated their strength to him (sinking of the Kursk, the Second Chechen), they say, who is the boss ... It didn't help in the end ... ...
    2. +3
      18 October 2015 16: 28
      All of them "see" only when the prefix "ex" is added to their position.
  17. +1
    18 October 2015 14: 53
    "Rural areas of the country?" ... Are there industrial ones there? I laughed at my rake in the country.
  18. 0
    18 October 2015 14: 55
    The vaunted American presence only exacerbates the situation. Soon, all troubled countries will turn to Russia for help, because there is none from the US and NATO, cover for their interests and nothing more.
  19. +1
    18 October 2015 15: 00
    There is nothing besides opium. Americans help with the export and sale, a lot of money.
    1. 0
      18 October 2015 19: 52
      Forty times (!) Afghan drug trafficking after the American warriors increased. Just a thing. AND? If you do not sentence villains, then what kind of bolt ??? A man, maybe your son, your daughter use this muck, is it time to decide the topic?
  20. 0
    18 October 2015 15: 13
    The melancholy is green, And the saddest thing is that it is next to us ...
  21. +1
    18 October 2015 15: 28
    Karzai did not have real power as president, and now all the more so that it’s empty talk, and as for the Amers, let them sit in Afghanistan, the British Empire and the USSR have sat up and the states have stayed, Afghanistan is a bad place
  22. +3
    18 October 2015 16: 04
    Karzai has long understood what the Pentagon is.
    That is why the USA hastened to replace it.
    The Yankees love to dangle their feet for ages for decades, and then use their claws for fishing.
  23. +5
    18 October 2015 16: 16
    The United States will do everything possible to continue drug trafficking to Russia and to continue military tensions practically on our borders. And Karzai apparently understood that they would not renew the "contract" with him, and one could speculate.
  24. 0
    18 October 2015 16: 52
    Quote: coconut tim
    Quote: Wend
    Yankees go home.

    They can't go home. Leave the "gold mine" unprotected - poppy plantations? It's beyond their power


    Yes you...
    Refuse drug addiction? We turn everything that is dirty into green
  25. 0
    18 October 2015 17: 40
    But is it impossible to terminate the security agreement. Well this is not bondage, after all. Tolley do not want to, or can no longer, either oppose the United States?
  26. 0
    18 October 2015 18: 11
    Yes, damn it, what is needed there !!!! one hundred years too war !!! the Aghans would ask, what do they need? or do not need anything other than drugs ????
  27. +1
    18 October 2015 19: 42
    He himself came to power on the bayonets of foreign troops, and now says that foreign troops contribute to terrorism)) he finally regained his sight.)))
  28. +1
    18 October 2015 19: 47
    (the presence of foreign troops called the fight against terrorism not only did not lead to its eradication, during this period terrorism became even stronger)

    Took and OPEN America. According to statistics from international anti-drug organizations, drug production in Afghanistan has increased 2003 times since 7. Afghanistan annually produces drugs worth $ 60 billion. 40% of this money ($ 24 billion) ends up in Afghanistan itself, 30% ($ 18 billion) ends up in the pockets of the international drug mafia and 30% ($ 18 billion) - on the accounts of intermediaries and the "roof" , which are citizens of the most democratic, most God-given country on Earth - the United States. Here is the alignment, gentlemen-comrades. And why shouldn't the states use these $ 18 billion to organize and support the mess in the Old World, the Middle East, Africa and the post-Soviet space? AND? Yes
  29. 0
    18 October 2015 20: 39
    "According to the ex-President of Afghanistan Hamid Karzai"

    Well, the ex-president of the USSR also grinds a lot of things, but who is now interested in it.
    IMHO: It would be better to shut up this Stavropol combiner.
  30. 0
    19 October 2015 05: 28
    Korzai, of course, is bluffing, sooner or later the Yankees will leave anyway, but Karzai will not be, Afghanistan will face big changes, well, such a country cannot be so long in feudal stagnation of political and economic, many of the Afghans began to realize that at one time they tried to to bring the USSR, he sees what Russia is today, but the Muslim clerical elite does not want to give power to secular hands, because the Taliban are again raising their heads ...
  31. 0
    19 October 2015 08: 04
    WHERE WILL THE EARTH BE WEARING THESE PARASITES ???

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"