Military Review

Ivan Okhlobystin. There is no intelligible mechanism capable of Russia guaranteeing the emergence of the next leader with the same outstanding talents as the current President

360
I dare to once again share my opinion on what is happening in Russia now. I like or dislike me - it does not matter. In the end, I'm not a ruble, so that everyone likes. And I can’t hide my opinion without risking once again to disappoint myself. Conscience does not allow. After all, for something the Lord gave me the opportunity to be heard by so many people.


So: By the grace of God of Russia, at last, I was lucky to get a normal President, just such as she needed in this contradictory segment. Stories. And everything seems to be going right. But the president is not forever. This fact is the same as the fact that there is no intelligible mechanism capable of Russia guaranteeing the emergence of the next leader with the same outstanding talents as the current President. And therefore it is necessary to squeeze the maximum benefit from the current situation. With such a high level of national trust in the President, the most intimate desires of the Orthodox, Russian people can now be realized. Namely:

1. Restoration of the monarchy, of course in the form that would harmoniously correspond to the current reality. I think that in Russia there are quite a few competent and creative political scientists, lawyers and economists, the strong-willed decision of the President, who are able to work out a form of sacralization of the power vertical and the design of this in the new Constitution. Each next leader, willy-nilly, will be forced to follow the predetermined standards of his predecessor, namely: to be an Orthodox Christian, since only the Orthodox Church has the ability to sacralize the power vertical, which in turn will provide the Church with additional levers of social and political influence. No matter how much the Orthodox Church would be criticized, it initially participated in the creation of the Russian State and it is thanks to her that Russia has not yet turned into a soulless, decaying, monster, mistakenly perceived by short-sighted people for an enlightened, European society. Also: sacralization of the power vertical will automatically consolidate the position of the ruling elite, even taking into account the possibility of changing future leaders. And the elite itself will be forced to reckon with the opinion of the Church, as a guarantor of the stability of its position. Such an alignment of forces in Russian society will create a favorable environment for the prosperity of the state. The era of the "temporary worker" will disappear, the era of the "zealous owners" will come. (Needless to say, my thoughts should not be considered as an ideal scheme. Life will surely make its own corrections. But ... We may no longer have a chance like this.)

2. The burial of the body of Ulyanov (Lenin) according to the Christian rite, with public funeral in the Cathedral of Christ the Savior, while observing absolute piety with regard to his ideological followers. Registration of this event in the act of civil reconciliation. (Ulyanov bequeathed to bury himself next to his mother. The duty of an Orthodox Christian is to fulfill the last will, even if a sinner, but a Christian.)
3. Waiver of death penalty moratorium for pedophiles and serial killers.

4. Deprivation of electoral rights of representatives of sexual minorities, as mentally ill people. (Which is obvious)

5. The inclusion in the passports of the graph "nationality" and "religion" as symbols of a conscious declaration of the credibility of citizens. (I am sure that representatives of other nationalities and religions living in Russia and sharing all grief and joy together with the Russian people for centuries will take these points with pride.).

On this, perhaps, I will finish my reflections, in the hope that all other ideas necessary for the prosperity of our Motherland will later be offered by other caring compatriots.
Author:
Originator:
https://vk.com/id238615607?w=wall238615607_1342823
360 comments
Ad

The editorial board of Voenniy Obozreniye urgently needs a proofreader. Requirements: impeccable knowledge of the Russian language, diligence, discipline. Contact: [email protected]

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. venaya
    venaya 18 October 2015 06: 07 New
    -92
    There is no intelligible mechanism capable of Russia guaranteeing the emergence of the next leader with the same outstanding talents as the current President

    So what? Is it really a priority today? In the future, of course, yes, this issue is certainly not resolved, and there are possible options, no matter how they are called. It is scary if the country rolls into the next, unreasonable abyss, while there is time, we will consider it.
    1. apro
      apro 18 October 2015 06: 17 New
      110
      Yes, there is no such mechanism, for today the main task for the majority is to take everything from life and there is at least a flood, it refers to both the upper and the main population of the country. We have lost normal life guidelines and the modern value system has greatly simplified money. Ivan Petrovich no money cattle bastard. And today this problem has come to the first line, what is the use of modernization, innovation if all the results are gnawing rats and continuous monitoring of progress.
      1. DEMENTIY
        DEMENTIY 18 October 2015 07: 57 New
        -11
        Quote: apro
        .Okhlobystina somewhat leads away ...


        I’m wondering what the comrade will begin to offer when Vladimir 1 (GDP in the sense) is replaced by an analogue of, say, Nicholas 2 with his world war and world revolution?
        Start advocating for democracy and call on Stepan Razin and Emelyan Pugachev?
        1. Angro Magno
          Angro Magno 18 October 2015 08: 24 New
          18
          And when will the analogue be replaced? And who? IPhone?
          And how are democracy, the robber and the pseudo-king connected?
          The confusion in your head, dear.
          1. Baikonur
            Baikonur 18 October 2015 09: 26 New
            -8
            Personally, I do not like Okhlobystin. He organized a parish, he was offered to serve far from the center, did not agree! And then he abandoned this business because he could not live in simple abundance and went back to the cinema to earn money, justifying this by the fact that he wanted to provide for his family (5 children). And starred in such a g ...! Already greatly infuriates him with a debilitating screaming role in interns, when by chance I see!

            But on all points I agree!
            1. Zefr
              Zefr 18 October 2015 22: 24 New
              26
              Yes? And what, there were no palace coups? There were no kings of kings? Didn't the clans share power? Did the people prosper? Or first, in the serfs? What does the king, what nonsense. And then, the king possesses property. What property are you going to transfer to him? The oligarchs stole, captured the national and state - you want to put them on a stake, but you can give the king, and so, with songs and cries of cheers?
              1. saygon66
                saygon66 18 October 2015 22: 40 New
                11
                - An interesting term: "The property of the king" ... The property of the monarch is the state! Everything and everyone ... so to speak ... The trick is that even the coolest oligarch (in their present form) has the habits of a small shopkeeper, a "pocket man", although sometimes very big ... these royal yachts, palaces - paraphernalia, nothing more ... Even the crown is not the property of the Monarch, but the Power! And, what is wrong with confiscating the stolen goods and handing it back to the State?
                1. Zefr
                  Zefr 19 October 2015 12: 53 New
                  +2
                  And which of the existing monarchs owns the entire state?
                  1. SMikhalych
                    SMikhalych 19 October 2015 15: 35 New
                    0
                    Quote: Zefr
                    And which of the existing monarchs owns the entire state?

                    Sheikh Brunei, for example bully
                    1. shasherin.pavel
                      shasherin.pavel 19 October 2015 19: 18 New
                      0
                      Sheikh is not a king, the east is a delicate matter, and never unite east and west. Or does someone want to go through the rite of circumcision after the Great Sheikh of all Russia? Get in line ...
                    2. Zoldat_A
                      Zoldat_A 20 October 2015 19: 25 New
                      +2
                      Quote: SMikhalych
                      Sheikh Brunei, for example

                      And in Norway, for example, oil production is nationalized. And no one, characteristically, will say that in Norway there is little democracy or that the Norgs are suckers in the sense of oil production ...

                      And in our Constitution, the state's ownership of the subsoil is recorded, but in fact anyone except the state manages them, and the state receives a penny from oil production in the form of taxes. And why shouldn't he get ALL the profit, and "successful managers" just pay a salary. Civil servants. Doctors ... laughing

                      By the way, if Sheikh Brunei owns the entire state, for example, then his personal budget = the state budget. And not a single extra penny will pass him by. And the Saudis are about the same, only they are both rulers and the main (and only) shareholders. You can't turn it there either. And for their own prosperity, they need a rich and contented country. So they spend their OWN money (or budget money?) On what we call "social sphere" and for what money, with our Bentleys, is always gone ...
                  2. shasherin.pavel
                    shasherin.pavel 19 October 2015 19: 13 New
                    +3
                    Quote: Zefr
                    the monarchs
                    comes from the word "mono" only + arch- power. Now there are no monarchs, there are kings who have a parliament and a prime minister who directly administers power. And this is not a "king" whom some foolish people want to return, who do not see the difference between a king and a king. Someone wants to see in Russia the royal court, living in one of the palaces maintained by the state, not ruling the country in any way, but receiving not feeble budget money, for doing nothing?
                    1. frollog
                      frollog 19 October 2015 22: 56 New
                      -5
                      Monarch, king, king ... We need a GOD-EMPEROR! =)
                      https://youtu.be/N2aaQdpvFJA?t=54s
                  3. bobrb1281
                    bobrb1281 20 October 2015 16: 57 New
                    0
                    Do not confuse the concept of monarchy constitutional and absolute. The monarch (or lower rank sovereign) does not have personal property. There is a state (domain) in control, and in the event of a change of power, no matter which way, the monarch loses everything.
                2. vkfriendly
                  vkfriendly 19 October 2015 14: 21 New
                  +1
                  Are you bored of the revolution? Who will give everything stolen just like that?
                  1. Stelth1985
                    Stelth1985 20 October 2015 05: 13 New
                    +3
                    Really people start to understand this)))))))))))))))! Hallelujah! Already I can’t believe my eyes! And what did you think that the oligarchs are kind uncles? It’s clear to hell that you’ll have to take it all with fire and sword!

                    For the Honor and Glory of the ancestors!
                  2. VseDoFeNi
                    VseDoFeNi 20 October 2015 06: 28 New
                    0
                    Why just like that? Cut your paper, let them rejoice.
              2. vkfriendly
                vkfriendly 19 October 2015 14: 19 New
                -17
                I want to supplement your thought. Under the tsar, if anyone had forgotten there was a thought and a cabinet that decided all matters, and the tsar was obliged to listen to their opinions, he himself didn’t decide the hell, so even at that time he was just a symbol of Russia, but about the autocrat’s tsar all Bolshevik propaganda
                1. shasherin.pavel
                  shasherin.pavel 19 October 2015 19: 27 New
                  +2
                  Not a single document had the right to be (even if it was permission to build a drinking establishment) without the personal signature of the emperor. So it was with Alexander I Alexander II, Nicholas II. Even permission to leave Alexander Pushkin for the treatment of Padagra in Switzerland required the personal signature of the king. Pushkin was cured by a peasant who saw his legs and prepared him a decoction from a nutshell. And someone speaks about a thought. Lermontov without the permission of the king could not leave the Caucasus.
                2. igorka357
                  igorka357 20 October 2015 11: 22 New
                  0
                  A useless addition ... misleading, so the king approved and signed any document with a draft or decree put forward by the chamber or thought, as you like! Without the signature of the king, the document is not valid!
              3. shasherin.pavel
                shasherin.pavel 19 October 2015 19: 06 New
                +1
                1 Samuel chap. 10 tbsp. 18. And he said to the children of Israel: "Thus says the Lord God of Israel: I brought you out out of the hand of the Egyptians and out of the hand of all the kingdoms that oppressed you. 19. But now you have rejected your God, who saves you from all your calamities and your troubles, and They said to him: "Set a king over us."
                1 Kings 8: Art. 11. and said: these are the rights of the king who will reign over you. He will take your sons and put them to his chariots. (maybe later harnessed instead of horses. Sh. P.) and his riders and they will run before his chariots. 12, and he will set thousandths and Pentecostals on his behalf, to cultivate his fields and harvest his bread, to make him military weapons and his chariot device. 13. He will take your daughters to make ointments for him, cook foods and bake bread. 14. and your fields will be taken and given to your servants by your best grape and olive gardens.
              4. kadcin-max
                kadcin-max 20 October 2015 17: 57 New
                0
                It seems to me not worth comparing kings from the past with what is being offered.
                I think this means a completely new monarchy, with a new ideological content. The question is how ...
            2. shasherin.pavel
              shasherin.pavel 19 October 2015 18: 49 New
              +3
              I do not like Okhlobystin, because he did not listen to me, but on all points I agree.

              "since only the Orthodox Church has the ability to sacralize the vertical of power, which in turn will endow the Church with additional levers of social and political influence."

              The Orthodox Church opposed attempts to oppose the Horde yoke. In Sarai, a Cathedral was built, where divine services were held and Orthodoxy was studied. The Orthodox Church had to blot out from history the words of Sergius of Radonezh to Dmitry Donskoy: "Send the rich gifts to the khan in Sarai, maybe he will forgive and everything will end in peace." And this was after the Tatars were defeated on the Vozha River. Dmitry Donskoy expels from Moscow the Byzantine patriarch, who stands up for the payment of tribute to the Horde, and dreams of placing a Russian priest in the patriarchate. After the Kulikov field, history was rewritten and it was written that Sergius of Radonezh blessed Dmitry to the battle and sent his monks Peresvet and Oslyabya with him. But what about the historical sources: Voivode Oslyabya was cut into a monk by his old age and served under the leadership of Bishop (if I am not mistaken) Cyprian. Prince Peresvet voivode rati with his detachment joins the army of Dmitry Donskoy. At the time of the gathering of the troops from the Grand Duke Dmitry and Hegumen Sergius, an irresistible affection due to the opposition of the prince to the Tatars.
              1. Stelth1985
                Stelth1985 20 October 2015 05: 18 New
                +3
                You think on the wrong side. Do you believe in the Tatar-Mongol yoke ??? Then I’ll tell you a secret: there was NO Yoke !!! There was a civil war, because the then parasens decided to separate from the state, make their estates and rule in it. Dukes. This is called fragmentation! And Tartaria, and that is what the Russian state was called in European, tried to return the rebellious lands. This war is still going on. Already more than a thousand years! Names changed simply.

                For the Honor and Glory of the ancestors!
            3. wartex
              wartex 20 October 2015 08: 58 New
              +2
              It's not about whether you like the author or not. You also earn money as much as you can and how you know how. Okhlobystin is right that if Russia is to revive the monarchy, now for this, it is time. But here a lot depends on the people. Will she want to !?
              Disagree with the author of the article in only one. DO NOT divide people by nationality and especially religion! Russia and the future leader of the country should find a way to unite the people, and not divide it even more.
            4. boggy
              boggy 20 October 2015 09: 16 New
              0
              Quote: Baikonur
              But on all points I agree!


              This is where you need to start.
              The identity of the author is secondary.
              There, on Zakrajina, there was an anti-selection of elites, the whole ratty bend climbs up the squeal. And to stop her impulse is impossible.
            5. kadcin-max
              kadcin-max 20 October 2015 17: 52 New
              0
              This is just your opinion. Many people think differently.
              Therefore, do not slide down to insults.
          2. ma_shlomha
            ma_shlomha 19 October 2015 10: 25 New
            +2
            According to Art. 92 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, it is the Prime Minister who directs foreign policy and power structures for three months!
            How much can be accomplished over these three months ...!?
          3. starshina78
            starshina78 19 October 2015 18: 03 New
            +2
            Just the iPhone is not even considered! You read the article poorly and, accordingly, did not understand the essence of the proposals that Okhlobystin offers. What with the departure of GDP, we do not have a person who could replace it - this is a fact. Those who flash on TV - this is waste material, slag. The worst thing is that with the departure of Putin, in Russia, the time of a mess, redistribution, and maybe unrest can begin. One Dzerzhinsky’s division for the whole of Russia is not enough. And here the Orthodox Church can act as a seal on a leading position, but together with other representatives of the main religions (Islam, Buddhism). Returning the king to the throne is perhaps a moot point. The Romanovs (who are the only candidates for the kingdom) are divorced from Russia, and too dependent on the West, which kept them for a long period of time. In general, I am for the monarchy in the image of Great Britain. The Queen is listed at the head of state, but little depends on her (once a year a throne speech, and even then it was prepared by the Prime Minister’s cabinet). For how this Queen strengthens the whole society !!! It’s high time to bury Lenin (he was baptized, but not buried in a Christian way), LGBT people agree that they will not give them the right to vote (otherwise they will choose the same and then disentangle). Okhlobystin speaks correctly!
            1. shasherin.pavel
              shasherin.pavel 19 October 2015 19: 35 New
              +2
              Quote: starshina78
              And here the Orthodox Church can act as a brace on a leading position

              This is the minus. The Orthodox Church is already "Cosa Nostra" under the guise of an angel. Few people understand that the celebration of the anniversaries of Cyril's arrival in the Patriarchate is collecting gifts from all churches in the form of monetary donations and not small ones, according to the rank. The regional ones also catch up with Cyril and begin to celebrate their namesake and their extortions from temples and churches. Can't you see that Putin is trying to celebrate the great holidays in regional churches, away from Kirill. When every gesture of a politician at international meetings is sucked into by the press, no one sees that it was not a cat that ran between Kirill and Putin, but a whole cat's pride. But etiquette is etiquette, on the day of the namesake from the President to the Patriarch a bouquet of flowers ... but in different directions. They have a political distance: personal relations do not allow closer, political interests further.
          4. shasherin.pavel
            shasherin.pavel 19 October 2015 18: 31 New
            -1
            Quote: Angro Magno
            And how are democracy, the robber and the pseudo-king connected?

            Historically ... all this happened in the life (of Russia) more than once, whom you wanted to surprise. Rebellions against princes younger and great, confrontation against the innovations of tsars, attempts on the lives of tsars - all this shows that autocracy is not an option for Russia. Nicholas I began to raise the country's economy, but with his European policy and internal actions caused the Crimean War, lost? her, but at the same time did not lose an arshin of land, slapped the British in the face in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, forced the English fleet to retreat from Kronstadt not salty, for some reason the tsars were afraid to build the Black Sea fleet for twenty years ... Ferdinand, laughing, told Nicholas I: " Build a fleet, because there are no punishments in the documents if you do not fulfill the contract. " But Nicholas I did not dare to revive the fleet. For three hundred years of the history of the Romanov dynasty, only Ivan the Terrible and Peter I brought something to Russia. Personally, I don't see any advantages in autocracy. After the Japanese War, the generals of the imperial Russian army refused to serve in the army even after the outbreak of the First World War, but joined the ranks of the Red Army. Some of them, being captured, chose to die, but did not go to serve in the White Guard. 75 officers from the 000 officer corps of 130 went to the service of the Red Army. Of the entire White Guard corps, one Wrangel was a "baron" from a seedy Swedish family, the rest of the chieftains, pupils of cadet corps. I explain: Cadets = state children, orphans, soldiers, who received the rank of non-commissioned officers when leaving the cadet corps.
            1. Angro Magno
              Angro Magno 23 October 2015 17: 29 New
              0
              Confused, with errors in historical facts, there is no answer to the question. Minus.
          5. Baloo
            Baloo 19 October 2015 20: 23 New
            +7
            Mr. Okhlobystin, I passed by, I want to ask. Who do you consider yourself: a priest, a politician, a lyceum? If a priest, do not meddle in politics — it is unworthy. Lyceum? -Do not talk about faith, your worldly work.
            Are you a politician ??? Do you have an appropriate education, scientific work, as a confirmation of competence?
            It is time to be determined and to achieve perfection in something. Your roles, to put it mildly, look more like clowning and clowning, as in a provincial KVN skit.
            Your actions and statements contradict the priesthood. Discussions about politics and government ... I'll go smoke.
            Although, I agree with paragraph 2,3,4. And with this your statement: hi drinks
            1. Stelth1985
              Stelth1985 20 October 2015 05: 26 New
              0
              Remember one thing: they do not become politicians. They are born! Reason is given to man from above. And now goofs and outright fools have climbed into power, for greed is generated by a lack of reason. That is, de facto any thief is essentially stupid, even if he makes cunning plans to rob the country.

              For the Honor and Glory of the ancestors!
          6. NEXUS
            NEXUS 19 October 2015 21: 26 New
            +2
            Quote: Angro Magno
            And when will the analogue be replaced? And who? IPhone?

            I believe that the GDP will be replaced by a person from the same services as Putin, and his appearance will be from akin to the appearance of Putin himself. Although the candidacy of the same Shoigu is also quite advantageous given his merits and performance.
            1. mark7
              mark7 19 October 2015 22: 24 New
              0
              Quote: NEXUS

              I believe that the GDP will be replaced by a person from the same services as Putin, and his appearance will be from akin to the appearance of Putin himself. Although the candidacy of the same Shoigu is also quite advantageous given his merits and performance.

              Of the same services, he still doesn’t talk about anything, the Nurgalians seem to be also one of those Shoigu, yes, as an option, but he’s also aged
            2. Stelth1985
              Stelth1985 20 October 2015 05: 28 New
              -4
              Not. The GDP will be replaced by a riot in 2017, and then the Tsar from the people. It will not be otherwise. So bequeathed from above.

              For the Honor and Glory of the ancestors!
              1. boggy
                boggy 20 October 2015 09: 44 New
                -1
                Quote: Stelth1985
                GDP will be replaced by a riot in 2017, and then the Tsar from the people






                You "tsar's struggle" once again submit from the people? The KING can only be given by the GOD, and the form of presentation can be any ... (including the Voice of the PEOPLE).
                For which we pray!
                1. Stelth1985
                  Stelth1985 21 October 2015 06: 58 New
                  0
                  You (the people) will have to earn the King. Stand under his banners and standards when he appears and calls you all. Fight for him. Destroy the enemies of the people without mercy. The Tsar will take care of the rest. He will raise your life from the garbage dump into which all these parasites drove you. The king will leave the military. And this will happen when the people themselves begin to rebel. Now everything is going to rebellion. Only a fool * does not see it. As soon as this happens, the military will begin to restore order and it is then that the Tsar will appear. This is the usual logic of revolutions and wars. Bring requirements to the Gods to give the King, to expedite the time of his arrival. Ask for the protection of our Motherland from enemies within the country and beyond!

                  For the Honor and Glory of the ancestors!
        2. Mikhail3
          Mikhail3 18 October 2015 12: 35 New
          +3
          Yes there is something to offer. For example, the obvious, the very thing that so far worked best. Let Putin choose his successor. So, as Yeltsin chose his successor. With all miracles, the people then believed Yeltsin. The result, as you see, people are very happy.
          So it would be logical and true to make a decision such as choosing the Monarch for life rule by the outgoing Monarch. So far, in all the written history, this worked best. Once it works - you have to continue!
          1. demo
            demo 18 October 2015 13: 09 New
            21
            Unfortunately the retinue makes the king!
            And our retinue, with the exception of a couple of people, is a rabble that must be driven by a filthy broom.
            Where to get the receiver from?
            Where is his experience, knowledge, skill?
            You won’t invite him from the street!
            And to have near you who is initially perceived as a future successor is not in the nature of our GDP.
            He is too peculiar a man.
            All "fastened" to the last hook so as not to grab.
            Р'РѕС ‚Рё РґСѓРјР ° йте.
            Today, despite all the fact that I relate to GDP without due reverence, he is certainly the optimal leader.
            But!
            At the stage of crisis.
            In politics, in economics, etc.
            For a statesman who thinks for years and centuries about his people and his state - he does not meet many specific requirements.
            This is my personal point of view.

            Well, the "pop-defrocked" Okhlobystin, not out of great understanding of the issue, raised this topic.
            Apparently, "the demons beguiled."
            After all, it is known that the "wedding to the kingdom" occurs only with the maximum possible participation and consent of all "elites" of the state.
            Well, how to be here?
            They only smile in public.
            And behind what?
            That's the same thing.
            While they agree among themselves, Russia will be covered with copper basins.
            But what about the people?
            Its representatives?
            How will they behave?
            Again, not the fact that everyone will satisfy everyone.
            So it will begin.
            We can’t agree with our neighbors at the same entrance.
            How is it?
            Bent Vanya topic.
            To be healthy.
            For "Interns".
            1. Foresterer
              Foresterer 18 October 2015 14: 54 New
              +4
              Under Yeltsin, too, Putin was not thought of as a successor. I think that the staff is taken care of and prepared. Only we do not know yet, and even if all sorts of Dvorovichi and others like them do not yet know.
              1. Arkon
                Arkon 19 October 2015 21: 01 New
                +1
                Totally agree.
                Putin set the task of creating a mechanism for the rise of those who deserve this power at the very beginning of his presidency.
                This is quite normal for a person concerned about the fate of the country. Today, Putin has a high percentage of tasks.
                I think Putin will solve this problem.
                And, most likely, already decided.
                And Okhlobystin is preparing public opinion as part of the task.
                1. mark7
                  mark7 19 October 2015 22: 47 New
                  +1
                  Quote: Arkon
                  And Okhlobystin is preparing public opinion as part of the task

                  Are you serious? Yes, he doesn’t prepare anyone, they correctly said above that he will first decide on his life, and the church for today's people is not at all what it was before the revolution
                  1. Arkon
                    Arkon 20 October 2015 11: 06 New
                    0
                    Quote: mark7
                    Are you seriously?


                    Remember the joke how the husband's wife at the entrance sends the garbage to take out? The simplest two-way.
                    Why, then, do you think that in the case of forming an opinion, everything is done loosely?
                    Okhlobystin may well play the role of "husband". smile
              2. Arjuna
                Arjuna 20 October 2015 09: 48 New
                +1
                People choose and that means a mistake is always possible. For example: Adropov-Gorbachev, people-Yeltsin.
            2. 97110
              97110 18 October 2015 15: 22 New
              -13
              Quote: demo
              Where to get the receiver from?
              Where is his experience, knowledge, skill?
              You won’t invite him from the street!

              You need to look among the great-great-grandchildren of Dzerzhinsky. Great-grandchildren must search. Carefully reading personal files and conducting candidate checks. But it is better to look for the regent to the heir. And to do the heir before it’s too late.
            3. saygon66
              saygon66 18 October 2015 18: 17 New
              0
              - "We will elect Misha Romanov to the kingdom - he is young, and we will be in the habit ...!" (C) In 1613, the "alignment" was no better ... However! The Zemsky Sobor determined the history of Russia for more than 300 years ahead! And, if History really has the property of repeating itself, there is a good prospect ... hi
              1. shasherin.pavel
                shasherin.pavel 19 October 2015 19: 49 New
                +2
                accustomed = obedient. The boyars were primarily concerned about themselves.
              2. Stelth1985
                Stelth1985 20 October 2015 05: 33 New
                0
                Yes. But you do not take into account modern realities and the presence of neighboring states of enemies and not even neighboring ones. In those years, the situation was different. Now worse for a number of reasons. If interested, I will write what are the reasons.
            4. Mikhail3
              Mikhail3 19 October 2015 09: 50 New
              +6
              Quote: demo
              Unfortunately the retinue makes the king!

              Luckily! Do not take only these Putin clowns for Putin’s team. They did not immensely increase state revenues, they did not raise power, they did not reform the army ...
              From whom to choose-Putin has, and not one. Public figures are chips in a huge game, the same DAM is a magnet and a trick for the West ...
              1. shasherin.pavel
                shasherin.pavel 19 October 2015 19: 54 New
                0
                And Shoigu? Of course, I don’t want to be circumcised, but Ramzan is attractive to me as a person, and Kadyrov as president - he does not like gays and drug lords either.
            5. would
              would 19 October 2015 17: 48 New
              +1
              If the retinue makes a king, then the king is by definition incapable.
          2. andj61
            andj61 18 October 2015 19: 15 New
            +4
            Quote: Mikhail3
            So it would be logical and true to make a decision such as choosing the Monarch for life rule by the outgoing Monarch. So far, in all the written history, this worked best. Once it works - you have to continue!

            Once - I agree - it turned out successfully. But who will guarantee that it will always be so?
            Strict selection criteria can be developed - and followed. And the opinion of the previous monarch can also play a role - as a plus sign, but no more.
          3. Gorinich
            Gorinich 19 October 2015 10: 12 New
            0
            I absolutely agree with you. For beautiful names, people do not see the real situation. With our clan system, choosing a successor is the best option. Only the word monarch is better to use. Because it is the ruler of a different procedure.
          4. shasherin.pavel
            shasherin.pavel 19 October 2015 19: 46 New
            +1
            Quote: Mikhail3
            the people then believed.

            ??? The people were mute, because Yeltsin surrounded himself with Yavlinsky, "Kinder surprises", Nemtsovs, and other rabble who are now licking EvJope's ass.
          5. holms-08
            holms-08 20 October 2015 06: 36 New
            0
            And if it turns out to be a bastard? A mechanism for excommunication should be provided.
        3. JIaIIoTb
          JIaIIoTb 18 October 2015 14: 24 New
          +4
          Sorry of course. But. Nicholas II did not unleash world wars and even more so world revolutions laughing
          Read for yourself what nonsense you have written. Once again I apologize for the word "nonsense" .... but you can't throw out the words from the song.
          1. 97110
            97110 18 October 2015 15: 26 New
            +3
            Quote: JIaIIoTb
            Nicholas II did not unleash world wars and even more so world revolutions

            He just fought for world peace. The result of the reign is the defeat of the fleet and army in the Far East as a warm-up in 1905 and their destruction together with the state in 1917.
          2. shasherin.pavel
            shasherin.pavel 19 October 2015 20: 24 New
            +3
            Witte, the Minister of the Interior, persuaded Japan to withdraw from the captured Daalyan and Port Arthur to create a free port for trade. Japan withdrew its troops and Witte persuades the Far East fleet to take Port Arthur, and Dalniy (Daalyan) snatched himself up for his personal affairs. Daalyan received the largest devants, but not a single foreign trading company received rights to Dalniy. Port Arthur was supplied on residual conditions. Instead of building a railway to Port Arthur, Witte leads it to Dalniy. The defeat of the Baltic Fleet in Tsushima makes Russia apply for loans in Europe. Witte takes out a loan in France, 200 tons of gold reserves (gold coins of international standard) are transferred to European banks on the security of loan repayment, and Nicholas II concludes a peace treaty with Germany. Witte realizing that the war is not far off, forcing the king to terminate the agreement with Germany and conclude an alliance with the Entente. In 1911, an alliance of Montenegro, Greece, Serbia and Bulgaria against Turkey is created. Serbia wants to get access to the Mediterranean Sea, but the Turks, losing the war, grants Albania sovereignty. The Bulgarians bring their borders to Istanbul, the Serbs begin to conflict with the Greeks over the Mediterranean port of Soloniki captured by Greece. The allies begin to fight against each other. The Turks took advantage of the turmoil and drove the Bulgarian troops from Istanbul and began to push the Serbs. in 1914, Russia enters the war on the side of the Entente. So who are the victims here? those who from allies turned into enemies, only because everyone wanted to become a great country at the expense of their allies. For whom we stood up, participating in this war. Britain built the fleet of Japan and pushed her foreheads with Russia, squeezed out the gold given as a guarantee of repayment of the loan. Margaret Thatcher forgave the USSR a debt of 200 000 pounds, for which Gorbachev forgave her debt on behalf of the USSR to the tsarist government of the Russian Empire, all 200 tons of gold coins of the gold standard. France, which received our soldiers to defend Paris, and after the revolution sent them to Algeria, fight in international battalions. So who started the war with the empires of Europe? Who unleashed the Civil War in Russia after the 9 of January 1905?
        4. 97110
          97110 18 October 2015 15: 15 New
          +3
          Quote: DEMENTIY
          when Vladimir 1 (GDP in the sense) is replaced by an analogue of, say, Nicholas 2
          Another Nicholas succeeded to the throne at the death of the priest, acting in accordance with the law of succession to the throne (I hope that it was adopted and entered into force in a proper manner). What kind of consort will the country get, and what kind of civil war can it be banned on the basis of its "Orthodoxness"? There is no substitute for GDP - admit it. It is necessary to zealously and publicly offer a prayer for the granting of GDP for many years. And to marry him urgently, for the survival of the heir (s). To search for brides, appoint a Commission, headed by Okhlobystin, by the State Duma from worthy and knowledgeable people in girls. The deadline for them is set to 01.01.2016. Hear Mr. Okhlobystin at every plenary meeting, with penalties for lack of due diligence. In case of a successful search for brides, encourage Mr. Okhlobystin with a trip (pilgrimage trip) to the holy places where the holiness of Nicholas the Second shone.
          1. a housewife
            a housewife 18 October 2015 20: 51 New
            +3
            It's ridiculous! No, really funny. I respect Okhlobystin, Orthodox, I consider the monarchy in Russia killed in vain. But in our time it can be revived only as a symbol. The real government should be elective, the term should depend on the effectiveness of government. Thus, the selection method and you can find people who really work for Russia. however, this is still only utopia, because those who have downloaded money will try to prevent this, and another civil war is an unacceptable thing for the country. Okay - I, a simple woman, am not strong in politics, but after all, how much I listen to our politicians, political scientists, leading various political television programs, I see that no one can offer a real recipe. It is possible that only Putin has some thoughts and plans on this topic, but we can only find out if he himself speaks out about this, most likely at the last moment when no one can interfere with his plans.
            1. sa-ag
              sa-ag 19 October 2015 08: 29 New
              +3
              Quote: housewife
              The real government should be elective, the term should depend on the effectiveness of government.

              And over there, the current government, according to the first person, works efficiently, even awarded orders for this business :-)
            2. 97110
              97110 19 October 2015 09: 13 New
              +1
              Quote: housewife
              the term should depend on the effectiveness of the board.

              It’s completely Roman. The powers are given (by the empire) for a short period of time (1 year), upon the resignation of powers, a case of extortion is immediately filed or in another decent case article. With a sanction in the form of a period depending on the effectiveness of the sending of powers.
            3. Stelth1985
              Stelth1985 20 October 2015 05: 38 New
              -1
              Because there will be a King! No one can raise the power falling from the hands of liberals today. Only the military, only the commander in chief, only the future Tsar. It is predicted that a hundred years after the fall of the autocracy, the new Tsar will rise in power and pull the stupid and decomposed people out of the mud!

              For the Honor and Glory of the ancestors!
        5. Navy7981
          Navy7981 18 October 2015 15: 33 New
          11
          I’m wondering what the comrade will begin to offer when Vladimir 1 (GDP in the sense) is replaced by an analogue of, say, Nicholas 2 with his world war and world revolution?
          Will he begin to advocate for democracy and call on Stepan Razin and Emelyan Pugachev? [/ Quote]

          , and where does the First World War, especially the Revolution and Nicholas 2? His participation in all this bedlam is indirect (the man swam with the flow and sailed to the Ipatyevsky basement and for a second try to imagine what he felt at that moment? HORROR of what was happening), and the problem is different in a catastrophic failure to understand the situation in the Empire, passivity in decision-making and not the ability to find personnel. As Comrade Stalin said: - cadres decide everything. If in the place of the unfortunate Nicholas on the throne there would be a man with the character of I.V. would there be a revolution? And on what conditions did we participate in World War I and what would we get from that? And Okhlobystin is right, Putin is not eternal, and suddenly, somehow, no one will break through to power and will be able to resist, like, say, the late Nemtsov, or is there someone else from the fighters against the regime ??? I do not want these creatures to "rule" my country. And our site will be closed immediately. But they will open some kind of new sex education! Or how to sell your country correctly, or bow to Angles, Balts, Ukram, and others from the family! And our heroes will not be Gulya Koroleva or Alexander Matrosov, 1th company, General Panfilov, Kutuzov or Raevsky, but General Vlasov, and this whole freak show of fighters against Russia. Better the Empire! And a clear understanding - the lieutenant of the Empire is higher in status than the "president" of some country.
          1. saygon66
            saygon66 18 October 2015 20: 03 New
            0
            - Something like that the heroes indecently mixed in a bunch ... smile
            - Prince Mikhail Illarionovoch Kutuzov, a nobleman, Field Marshal ...
            - Raevsky Nikolai Nikolayevich, nobleman, general from the cavalry ... Monarchists and, we will not be afraid of this word - "serf owners" ... "they owned souls, yeah ... and the system under which History noted the Komsomol A. Matrosov and a member of the CPSU (b) since 1920, Major General Ivan Vasilyevich Panfilov would hardly have been greeted with delight ... Vlasov Andrei Andreevich, Major General, by the way, is also from Soviet Russia ... And when is it the Russian Empire to all of the above ur .. Did she bow down to the characters? She, the Empire, ruled them firmly ... and according to some comrades, she bent down harshly! It was they who became "great nations" under the Bolsheviks, and before they were all ... citizens of the Empire ...
          2. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
        6. Foreman49
          Foreman49 18 October 2015 15: 57 New
          +7
          Since the Russian people do not have the subjectivity of national rights in the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Therefore, Russia will face a catastrophe with new "national ideas-charades" depending on the wishes of Medvedev and the Gaidariks from HIS entourage.
          In the United States, 300 years of the national idea is in the interests of the United States, including "international law". There were some presidents who did not fully understand this. They were shot, now the charades don't even enter the head. Strengthen this line sometimes hang kicking allies!
        7. forest park 86
          forest park 86 18 October 2015 16: 20 New
          -7
          nikolashka (second) pro.sral all that could both the empire and the war. if it weren’t for the Bolsheviks, we would be slaves of the unkind thing. I support clauses 2.3.4. and Putin’s BB needs to be cloned — otherwise Zh.op.a or YES M any
          1. saygon66
            saygon66 18 October 2015 22: 25 New
            +3
            - Well, this is unlikely ... Russia also seemed to end in the Time of Troubles ... Even the Poles were almost sitting on the throne - but no, they turned out ... If there weren’t the Bolsheviks, there would be new Minins princes and Pozharsky citizens .. And I want to believe that there are more!
        8. andj61
          andj61 18 October 2015 19: 12 New
          +3
          Quote: DEMENTIY
          I’m wondering what the comrade will begin to offer when Vladimir 1 (GDP in the sense) is replaced by an analogue of, say, Nicholas 2 with his world war and world revolution?

          Do you think Boris 1 was better than Nicholas 2? what Any form of government is not immune from failure with a leader! But the monarchy may not be hereditary. And the criteria for the candidates can be selected - and very strict, such as to surely weed out the random and weak.
          This topic was addressed by the science fiction writer Zlotnikov, and he has good and deserving of attention and thoughtful consideration of ideas about the choice of emperor. It is the emperor - Russia is nothing but the Empire can not be
          1. DEMENTIY
            DEMENTIY 18 October 2015 19: 26 New
            +2
            Quote: andj61
            And the criteria for the candidates can be selected - and very strict, such as to surely weed out the random and weak.


            Those. elections are easier to say. And what prevents to weed out the casual and the weak under the current system? Or do you think that the "magic" word monarchy will help miraculously?
            Hello Andrey.
            And at the same time enlighten the orphan how the funeral in the Orthodox rite of Lenin will help Russia.
            1. Stelth1985
              Stelth1985 20 October 2015 05: 45 New
              0
              Not elections, but political schools. This is true in the long run. When will they pick up political talent from childhood. And all trash will not even come close to power, even if it is fabulously rich. And in the short term - a war that will push the King herself out of the people.

              Lenin must be buried, and the Mausoleum to be dismantled. This is an area of ​​esotericism. I do not think that you understand this and know how this construction affects the country. Do not touch the rest of the Soviet!

              For the Honor and Glory of the ancestors!
          2. Corsair
            Corsair 19 October 2015 14: 35 New
            +1
            Quote: andj61
            This topic was addressed by the science fiction writer Zlotnikov, and he has good and deserving of attention and thoughtful consideration of ideas about the choice of emperor. It is the emperor - Russia is nothing but the Empire can not be

            I read a lot of his books, but I don’t know about the choice of the emperor - don’t tell me, it’s very interesting. I liked his calculations about the dependence of expansion and religion, somewhat agree with his early thoughts (from books naturally) that the Orthodox Church often forces slavish obedience and perception of the world, forgiveness, etc.
            And I also think that the ruler should be an absolutely secular person, and no ostentatious trips to churches, mosques, etc. showing it across all the media. Unless on their grand opening.
            And if a believer, then you don’t have to do a show, remember who you need, put candles, or what fasting, prayer, etc. and no media out there at all.
            And the "ministers" of religions should behave more modestly, some already have hari on the screen (40 inches!) And more property has been acquired than other buildings where people go to pray.
        9. Wasiliy1985
          Wasiliy1985 19 October 2015 20: 04 New
          +1
          That is precisely why I categorically disagree with paragraph 1 of this memorandum!

          Power must be secular! And certainly without the "restoration of the monarchy"!

          Bloodsuckers were choked both in Russian-Japanese and in the First World War. The result is only, in both cases, negative.

          And the "Workers 'and Peasants' Red Army" both in 1904 and in 1914-1917 broke in 1945 so that our enemies hiccup in 2015, trying to justify their insignificance.
          (Generals from Pontogon look funny, answering: "I'll find out in the office" ..
          Our Jen, who is Psaki, even a red-haired woman, and not a general with stars ..)
        10. Stelth1985
          Stelth1985 20 October 2015 05: 09 New
          0
          If such people as Stepka or Emelyan come, then you will not only recognize Russia, but the whole world, because both the first and the second have nothing to do with the "Russian State" AT ALL!

          For the Honor and Glory of the ancestors!
      2. ZU-23
        ZU-23 18 October 2015 08: 41 New
        13
        It’s not hard to guess who put the article cons laughing
        1. DEMENTIY
          DEMENTIY 18 October 2015 08: 57 New
          18
          Quote: ZU-23
          It’s not hard to guess who put the article cons laughing


          I think, yes. How difficult it is to determine the "value" of an article, which is expressed by the simple motto: "For all good - against all bad!"
          1. ZU-23
            ZU-23 18 October 2015 11: 28 New
            +4
            Quote: DEMENTIY
            I think, yes. How difficult it is to determine the "value" of an article, which is expressed by the simple motto: "For all good - against all bad!"

            And what's wrong with that, because a person’s landmark is completely human, so if you don’t like something, you can at least not gloat with the minuses.
            1. Mestny
              Mestny 18 October 2015 12: 04 New
              +6
              As soon as someone among the general wave of critical statements of "experts" suddenly speaks out specifically on the topic of "what to do", there and then a massive chatter about that this is all wrong, do not do this in any case, and indeed himself the author is a so-so man.
              Famous persons speaking so specifically, are at a considerable risk of losing their reputation. They can spit at times, or even throw virtual stones.
              My personally expressed concrete position on such important issues arouses respect for the author of expressions regardless of his professional and personal qualities.
            2. DEMENTIY
              DEMENTIY 18 October 2015 13: 59 New
              -5
              Quote: ZU-23
              And what's wrong with that, because a person’s landmark is completely human ...


              As long as he did not take these "pearls" outside his own kitchen, nothing bad happened. And so he reduced all of Russia (!) To 5 miserable points ...
              1. skifd
                skifd 18 October 2015 14: 55 New
                +3
                Quote: DEMENTIY
                Until he took these "pearls" outside his own kitchen, nothing bad happened. And so he reduced all of Russia (!) To 5 these wretched points .


                I hope to see from you the FULL economically verified and adjusted politically alternative version of the development of Russia. With hope for you. I'm waiting. love

                But seriously, Okhlobystin is not even a political scientist. This is the private opinion of a certain citizen. Moreover, a "creative personality". Quite obvious things with a "bend in phntasm". What is his "sin" ?! smile You will compare with the statements of some of our "held power", and with the "deeds" of the Cabinet of Ministers, strenuously pursuing "liberoid" ideas. Okhlobystin will be immediately lost.
                1. DEMENTIY
                  DEMENTIY 18 October 2015 16: 29 New
                  +6
                  Quote: skifd
                  I hope to see from you the FULL economically verified and adjusted politically alternative version of the development of Russia. With hope for you. I'm waiting.


                  In vain you wait - my surname is not Okhlobystin and I voice my miserable items in the kitchen.
                  But seriously, I do not know the recipe for a country that the famous empress compared with the universe. And I (unlike Okhlobystin) is not ashamed to admit it.
          2. The comment was deleted.
        2. st25310
          st25310 18 October 2015 15: 04 New
          -7
          I think it is necessary to hold a referendum on leaving Putin for life.
          1. skifd
            skifd 18 October 2015 19: 29 New
            -1
            Quote: st25310
            I think it is necessary to hold a referendum on leaving Putin for life.


            Why do you HATE him so much ??? !!!! laughing Yes, with any such "attempt", such a howl will rise, so much .. a (something) will splash on the fan .... Oh-wei ... It's terrible to imagine laughing wassat !!
            And why is it? It is better to hope for the sanity of the next applicant, the consistency of the course towards the revival of the country. Otherwise, clownery. I do not think that Putin needs to be like "Old Man". Better to create a strong team - a guarantee against any "unexpected", history (especially the last) is replete with examples of instability of systems based on the authority of one (!) Leader. Surely the president understands this very well. So wow, wow ... hi
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. Asadullah
        Asadullah 18 October 2015 09: 45 New
        16
        Yes, there is no such mechanism


        The fact is that Putin without a team can do little. That is, its success is the success of a sufficiently large circle of leading persons and feedback from the executing mechanism. Putin himself should be liked a priori by an ordinary citizen, - he speaks correctly and clearly, does not give empty promises, follows the form, which has a completely presidential face. For example, Medvedev, despite the fact that he is not the last person on the team, doesn’t like the people in any way. And first of all, due to the fact that the muzzle of the face did not come out.

        Whatever it was, I think that before leaving the post of President, the forces will be directed to the formation of the organizational system in the state, in order to prevent the sole unreasoned decisions. Naturally, non-random people should fall into the leadership. But this, in my opinion, is the most difficult, with the modern electoral system. How to create a control and quality mechanism is perhaps the most difficult task.
        1. dauria
          dauria 18 October 2015 11: 05 New
          20
          But this, in my opinion, is the most difficult, with the modern electoral system. How to create a control and quality mechanism is perhaps the most difficult task.


          It is naive to think that there is no mechanism. In the same US elections? Well, actually, yes. The richest adults clans of serious uncles agree on the "gangway" and let the "people" play the elections. A pair of identical tame candidates. Then all the bumps on them. And serious guys remain at the helm. (With countries dependent on the United States, it's even easier. If anything goes wrong, economic problems will begin)

          By and large, our "seven bankers" has not gone anywhere. Putin simply revived them and organized them into a "flock." So leave naive dreams of a "tsar", socialism, and fair elections. A person from the outside will never appear in this "flock".
          1. vladimir_krm
            vladimir_krm 18 October 2015 16: 03 New
            16
            Another would not have done that. I recently congratulated Belarusians:

            My congratulations to Belarusians

            Especially for those who are upset.

            There is a very wise Russian proverb: "Goodness is not sought after."

            Doubt it? Then look at Ukraine: Kuchma get, Yushchenko get, Yanukovych get ... What is the result?

            The presidency requires a lot of knowledge that is not taught anywhere, ability and, moreover, talent. And also experience that you won’t get anywhere else. Paradox. And finding the right person for this position is more difficult than winning a major prize in the lottery. Matter of chance. You are lucky, do not even doubt it.

            Do not repeat our mistakes, do not look for adventures in your country so that it does not turn into the place where you usually look for adventures :)
            1. Gorinich
              Gorinich 19 October 2015 10: 35 New
              +5
              So the question is why they do not teach? Why is the most important profession in the country not taught? And the answer is: because only their care is baked about their ass, and not about the benefits of the state and people. In fact, it has long been noticed that the higher the boss, the bigger he is a bastard.
            2. Valentine
              Valentine 19 October 2015 14: 06 New
              +1
              Or "What we have, we do not store, but when we lose it, we cry."
        2. BMW
          BMW 18 October 2015 11: 31 New
          +4
          Quote: Asadullah
          The fact is that Putin without a team can do little. That is, its success is the success of a sufficiently large circle of leading persons and feedback from the executing mechanism.

          Tell us about this feedback mechanism on Vostochny, either on Sakhalin or Komi. And his team, his flesh of flesh.
          Quote: Asadullah
          For example, Medvedev, despite the fact that he is not the last person on the team, doesn’t like the people in any way. And first of all, due to the fact that the muzzle of the face did not come out.

          Are you picking the president in the face. fool What do you dislike about DAMA’s face? It’s quite decent and very intelligent. Then what?

          Article bullshit, just GDP and EP ass licked. And so that the licking was not so obvious, he started the Russian Orthodox Church, LGBT, Lenin and the death penalty. The crap is complete, you just don’t have to live by concepts and reason by authority. The head is needed not only to have it.
        3. Kilo-11
          Kilo-11 18 October 2015 11: 48 New
          21
          The team of Mr. Putin is the anti-popular government of Mr. Medvedev, consisting of such characters as gentlemen: Shuvalov, Dvorkovich, Rogozin, Siluanov, Ulyukaev and other gentlemen; the United Russia party, which is constantly shaken by corruption scandals, is a member of this party or was the governor Khoroshavin, for example; friends, comrades, just close people, such as gentlemen Timchenko, Kovalchuk, the Rotenberg brothers, Yakunin, Chubais, Abramovich. It will not be a bad team for the newly anointed tsar-emperor. No, gentlemen-comrades, thank you, we do not need such a tsar-emperor with Such a team. The country really needs a strong, honest and principled leader, a true patriot of Russia. Let's hope that the people and the country will be lucky, with time there will be such a person. Well, in the meantime, in 2018, "at the request of the workers" we will have 4 or 5 episodes one domestic series.
          1. BMW
            BMW 18 October 2015 13: 31 New
            +5
            Quote: Kilo-11
            The country really needs a strong, honest and principled leader, a true patriot of Russia. Let's hope that the people and the country will be lucky, such a person will appear over time. Well, in the meantime, in 2018, "at the request of the workers" we will have 4 or 5 episodes of one domestic TV series.

            Peace, friendship, chewing gum. Well said, I hope that the series will end, and the faster the better. good
          2. Corporal Valera
            Corporal Valera 18 October 2015 15: 47 New
            +9
            Quote: Kilo-11
            The country really needs a strong, honest and principled leader, a true patriot of Russia. Let's hope that the people and the country will be lucky, with time such a person will appear. Well, in the meantime, in 2018, "at the request of the workers" we will have 4 or 5 episodes of one domestic series ...

            Yeah, a strong, honest, principled leader from the hinterland, will win the election with funds raised by the people and will rule wisely and skillfully ... You leave these tales for the night. Where have you seen such leaders? The principal and leader in general are the words antonyms.
            1. sa-ag
              sa-ag 18 October 2015 16: 54 New
              -4
              Quote: Corporal Valera
              A leader from the hinterland, he will win the election with funds raised by the people and will rule wisely and skillfully ... You leave these tales for the night. Where have you seen such leaders?

              Vladimir Ilyich Lenin his last name :-)
              1. Cat man null
                Cat man null 18 October 2015 17: 02 New
                +4
                Che, again the boom revolution do ??
                1. sa-ag
                  sa-ag 19 October 2015 08: 25 New
                  +3
                  Quote: Cat Man Null
                  Che, again the boom revolution do ??

                  Well, with this question to the gentlemen from the inner circle, historically they begin this business
              2. saygon66
                saygon66 18 October 2015 23: 46 New
                0
                - Lenin is the call sign ... Ulyanov is his last name!
            2. Kilo-11
              Kilo-11 19 October 2015 00: 03 New
              +2
              Answering your question about the leaders, Comrade I.V. Stalin.
        4. Corporal Valera
          Corporal Valera 18 October 2015 15: 31 New
          12
          Quote: Asadullah
          Medvedev, despite the fact that he is not the last person on the team, does not like the people. And first of all, due to the fact that the muzzle of the face did not come out.

          It seems to me that the muzzle of the face is just the last thing. He has more serious "merits"! Somehow de-Stalinization, modernization, swamping, Libya, the Cabinet, advice to citizens to travel around the country in search of food ... I only remembered the most vivid thing. Maybe that's why you don't like the muzzle?
      5. Sasha 19871987
        Sasha 19871987 18 October 2015 17: 22 New
        0
        an article, plus unambiguously - God forbid us the president like a drunkard or the current "hohlolider" fight ... and God forbid our president a wagon of health and nerves
      6. Rarahin
        Rarahin 19 October 2015 09: 51 New
        +3
        Actually, and how much weight can the word of a former "clergyman" have, who voluntarily became a buffoon? For the sake of money.
        But never when he did not miss the opportunity for the church (with which he left having plunged into the bosom of sin)
        speak, substantiate your opinion on church dogma ...

        Here are a few statements by Okhlobystin:
        about the state of Russia:

        “Russia is weakening day by day. In fact, we no longer have an economy. There is no intelligible education system. There is no army. There is no science. Our children have no prospects, even if they are lomonosov ”

        About the Russian idea:
        “The national idea - in principle, it is one and the same - world domination. Only one nation does not have such an idea, or rather, it is a different one. This is an anti-idea, because we were originally woven from a huge number of people. So, our national idea is to prevent the realization of the national ideas of other nations. ”

        From an interview with Echo of Moscow:

        “One person does not decide anything, especially the president. I do not believe in presidential power ”
    2. Mihaylo Tishayshiy
      Mihaylo Tishayshiy 18 October 2015 06: 57 New
      16
      Quote: venaya
      There is no intelligible mechanism capable of Russia guaranteeing the emergence of the next leader with the same outstanding talents as the current President
      So what? Is it really a priority today?

      And when should you attend to solving this problem? On the eve of the end of Putin's presidential term ?. The fact of the matter is that the authorities have now built such a system that the emergence of any new leader (no matter from which side) is strictly suppressed. Although this is typical not only for our government. For example, try organizing your party and pushing it into the US Congress or the Bundestag. And within the framework of existing parties, try to break through to the top (in any country). We just brought the system in line with other "democracies". Okhlobystin understands this on a subconscious level, and formulated a way out of this in a rather peculiar way:
      1. Putin must resign by appointing the day of his coronation!
      2. CJSC ROC must now fulfill the role of the Central Committee of the CPSU!

      I myself hate liberalism, but not to the same extent!
      Although the article was a plus, Vanya raised his spirits in the morning! laughing
      1. venaya
        venaya 18 October 2015 07: 17 New
        19
        Quote: Mihaylo Tishayshiy
        the authorities have now built such a system that the appearance of any new leader (no matter which side) is strictly suppressed.

        I’m about it. The emergence of a new leader from a foreign side must be brutally suppressed. And what is happening with us today? The emergence of patriotic leaders is suppressed in the most cruel ways. And it is precisely on this that I try to draw your attention.
        1. Mihaylo Tishayshiy
          Mihaylo Tishayshiy 18 October 2015 08: 11 New
          +2
          Quote: venaya
          The emergence of patriotic leaders is suppressed in the most cruel ways. And it is precisely on this that I try to draw your attention.

          Absolutely agree with you.
        2. BMW
          BMW 18 October 2015 11: 37 New
          +4
          Quote: venaya
          The emergence of patriotic leaders is suppressed in the most cruel ways. And it is precisely on this that I try to draw your attention.

          What are you talking about, in principle, any alternative is suppressed, and the "sent" are not pressed especially, or rather they are rarely pressed, they are simply hushed up and that's all.
      2. 44 World
        44 World 18 October 2015 07: 20 New
        13
        An interesting article ... I do not completely agree with the author, but definitely gives reason to think ...
        1. sabakina
          sabakina 18 October 2015 08: 40 New
          +8
          Quote: 44World
          An interesting article ... I do not completely agree with the author, but definitely gives reason to think ...

          Perhaps I will join the fellow countryman ...
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. Karabanov
        Karabanov 18 October 2015 07: 42 New
        16
        Quote: Mihaylo Tishayshiy
        And when should you take care of solving this problem? On the eve of Putin’s term? The fact of the matter is that the authorities have now built such a system that the appearance of any new leader (no matter which side) is strictly suppressed.

        I agree that the appearance of dissent, even if insignificant, has never been welcomed by any current government. Now the party in power has overgrown with meat, swam with fat, and is morally degrading, degenerating ... They don’t see this, and the president has been lacquering for many moments with his authority and popular support.
        There must be a democratic mechanism for a change of power and a law that is valid for all, otherwise stagnation sets in. Only in this case, those at the helm will move at least a little, because there is a fear of losing their bureaucratic seats, or even their asses ...
      5. K-50
        K-50 18 October 2015 08: 25 New
        20
        Quote: Mihaylo Tishayshiy
        Putin must resign by appointing a day for his coronation!

        And what is coronation required?
        It seems to me that the supreme head of the country (it does not matter what is called) must still be elected and fulfill his DUTIES as long as he suits the voters. There is a saying "nature rests on children." Therefore, I am against the transfer of powers by inheritance. This must be earned by deeds, and not by the fact of the desired birth.
        I see no reason to limit it to some years. There is a saying "who is lucky, they go on that." The Supreme fulfills his duties, honor and praise him, does not fulfill with honor to spend on vacation (if he deserves the honor). All other crappy delights are from the evil one. The head controls his TEAM, when the head changes, the team changes unambiguously. Of course, you can leave someone, but only if you really deserve it, like Shoigu, for example.
        Inclusion in passports of the column "religion

        I don’t see the point about religion, to be honest. All the same, it is more personal than public. So I have no desire to be religious, well, no. Is it that I now have to inform everyone about it with my mark in my passport?
        This is my own business!
        I don't think I'm the only one of that kind.
        I agree with the rest. But here is how to develop a mechanism for selecting the worthy. request
        1. saygon66
          saygon66 18 October 2015 18: 34 New
          +3
          - Sorry! How is it not public !? "In Russia, only one thing is possible: Faith is Orthodox, Power is Autocratic!" (C) So it seems? And if "all sisters - by earrings" - then this is an embryo of tolerance just ... Openly expressed his religious (political, national) affiliation - it means that you can't hold a stone in your bosom ... no - you have become, "bombist" - wait for the special forces in guests ... smile
        2. Gorinich
          Gorinich 19 October 2015 10: 46 New
          +7
          Sheckley, in my opinion, has a wonderful story on this subject. The bottom line is this: the ruler is allowed to publish and enforce any laws. But there is a condition that a bomb connected with universal suffrage is hung on the neck. And as soon as the number of dissatisfied exceeds the number of satisfied, it explodes. In my opinion it is very effective wink
      6. Eragon
        Eragon 18 October 2015 09: 09 New
        +4
        Quote: Mihaylo Tishayshiy
        Putin must resign by appointing a day for his coronation!

        It is impossible. For there are legitimate heirs to the throne. Somehow everyone forgets that the Romanov dynasty lives and lives. So if you restore the monarchy, then only with the Romanovs, otherwise in the eyes of all monarchs Putin will become an impostor.
        And if you restore the Romanovs to the throne, then the descendants of the nobles will come back and claim the property of their families. But this is a trifle, in comparison with international treaties and in general with all the laws of the USSR and Russia since February 1917. Under democracy and pseudo-democracy, treaties and laws are issued on behalf of the state, and under the monarchy only on behalf of the monarch. Therefore, all documents from February 1917 for the monarch are just paper, at least until he approves them, taking full responsibility. Will it approve? For fun in world jurisprudence begins ...
        1. Mihaylo Tishayshiy
          Mihaylo Tishayshiy 19 October 2015 04: 55 New
          +1
          Quote: Eragon
          It is impossible. For there are legitimate heirs to the throne. Somehow everyone forgets that the Romanov dynasty lives and lives. So if you restore the monarchy, then only with the Romanovs, otherwise in the eyes of all monarchs Putin will become an impostor.

          Forgive me, but the Romanovs, after the Rurikovichs, were exactly ELECTED (if there were, even though distant, but still Rurikovichs, like the current Romanovs)! Do you really think that Putin's lawyers will not "hurry" to resolve this issue?
          1. Eragon
            Eragon 19 October 2015 21: 26 New
            0
            Quote: Mihaylo Tishayshiy
            Sorry, but the Romanovs, after the Rurikovich, were precisely ELECTED

            Of course, they were elected, due to the extinction of the Rurikovich - the dynasty ended. And the Romanov dynasty is alive and well.
        2. Rarahin
          Rarahin 19 October 2015 11: 35 New
          0
          Quote: Eragon
          For there are legitimate heirs to the throne. Somehow everyone forgets that the Romanov dynasty lives and lives.

          The last king of the Romanov dynasty denied. renounced for himself and his son - Alexei. In favor of his brother. and brother, in turn, also denied.

          The Romanovs voluntarily laid down the right to be Russian monarchs.
          And who needs the heirs of the "royal family" who have lived all their lives abroad on overseas subsidies, alien to Russia and everything Russian.

          Moreover, their ancestors, with their abdication in a difficult moment for the country, abandoning Russia to their own devices, themselves called themselves cowards ...
      7. The comment was deleted.
        1. Andrey NM
          Andrey NM 18 October 2015 10: 02 New
          19
          Also: the sacralization of the power vertical will automatically consolidate the positions of the ruling elite, even taking into account the possibility of a change in future leaders. And the elite itself will be forced to reckon with the opinion of the Church as a guarantor of the stability of its position. Such a balance of power in Russian society will create an environment favorable for the prosperity of the state.


          The church has never served prosperity. The fight against dissent - yes, the brake on development - yes, the struggle for power in all, including cruel and bloody forms - yes. Yes, the guys in robes inside their office squabble so that God forbid. Faith should be in a person's head if he needs faith. For this it is not necessary to go to church and break the forehead of the icon. Moreover, in order to retain power, these "ministers" begin manipulating the consciousness of the parishioners, and then a showdown begins between parishes in Ukraine, ISIS grows on this basis, the Old Believers go into the forests ... And now there are also claims to property, like give us Isakiy, if you build churches, then only in the center of cities on the most expensive land, etc., but protect us from taxes, don't take a communal apartment ...
      8. Valentine
        Valentine 18 October 2015 14: 30 New
        +4
        You, Quiet, take a closer look, from all sides, analyze the situation in the country, whose and which forces (parties) are "breathing" with what. If the Gorbachev and Yeltsiniad would have continued to this day, then Russia would
        It has long been carpeted in the hallway of Lithuania or Ukraine,
        not to mention Europe and the United States, and what this means, no one needs to explain. All this can be seen in the same Ukraine with Lithuania, Bulgaria with Romania and Hungary - their fate is to be slaves, they have not been given another one. They forgot about their pride, about their history, forgot about their ancestors
        that bit by bit collected and connected their lands.
        I do not want this to happen to us, to Russia, so that
        it was used by Europe and the United States, and therefore succession in governing Russia should not be, as president, a monarch, it does not matter how to call it, even the Secretary General, but for peace and tranquility in the country. For those who do not understand this, I advise go to the Donbass, sit there under shelling and bombing for a year and a half, in hunger and cold, then maybe you will understand something. And while the GDP rules the country,
        there will be order in it, and we don’t need anything else.
        1. Mihaylo Tishayshiy
          Mihaylo Tishayshiy 19 October 2015 05: 27 New
          +1
          Quote: Valentine
          You, Quiet, take a closer look, from all sides, analyze the situation in the country, whose and which forces (parties) "breathe" with what.

          Do you think that I, having lived for half a century, have not learned to analyze the situation?
          Before you answer, I looked at your previous comments, and you watched mine?
          Quote: Valentine
          If Gorbachev and Yeltsiniade continued to this day, then Russia would
          It has long been carpeted in the hallway of Lithuania or Ukraine,

          Quote: Valentine
          I do not want this to happen to us, to Russia, so that
          it was used by Europe and the USA, and therefore, succession in governing Russia should be, whether as president, a monarch, it does not matter how to call it, even the Secretary General, but that there should be peace and tranquility in the country.

          ?????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????
          Do you understand my question?
    3. bornikrub
      bornikrub 18 October 2015 08: 15 New
      17
      Remember the consequences of the seizure of power by Khrushchev.
      Mao: after the betrayal of Stalin by Soviet revisionists, the USSR is doomed.
    4. SSR
      SSR 18 October 2015 09: 03 New
      +7
      Quote: venaya
      There is no intelligible mechanism capable of Russia guaranteeing the emergence of the next leader with the same outstanding talents as the current President

      So what? It’s scary if the country rolls into another, unreasonable abyss, while there’s time, we’ll think about it.

      And who assured you that there is time? There is a good saying - do you want to make God laugh? Tell him about your plans.
      1. venaya
        venaya 18 October 2015 09: 28 New
        0
        Quote: SSR
        Quote: venaya
        So what? It’s scary if the country rolls into another, unreasonable abyss, while there’s time, we’ll think about it.
        And who assured you that there is time? There is a good saying - do you want to make God laugh? Tell him about your plans.

        I agree with you. Indeed, my use of a rather imprecise formulation confused not only you, but me too. Apparently it is necessary to be more careful with the construction of phrases in order to avoid ambiguity. "And who assured you that there is time?"- while I am not observing a temporary catastrophe, but I will probably have to think about the future. Read my subsequent posts, where I explain in more detail what I mean.
        1. subbtin.725
          subbtin.725 18 October 2015 09: 43 New
          +7
          3. Waiver of death penalty moratorium for pedophiles and serial killers.

          There are also high-ranking corrupt officials, because by their "actions" they undermine the confidence in the government of the majority of ordinary citizens. With obligatory confiscation.
          1. TanakaKenshin
            TanakaKenshin 18 October 2015 19: 38 New
            +4
            Why is this an execution?
            To Siberia, work out ...
            All. What was stolen. Completely. To work out. Over the minimum wage minus the content. am
    5. 97110
      97110 18 October 2015 14: 50 New
      +2
      Quote: venaya
      the question is not resolved ... the country will slide into an unreasonable abyss.

      Will the question be resolved if there is any justification for the abyss? The process of substantiating the abyss is not technologically resolved (resolved?) We will order a project (project?) Of the justification of the abyss, where the country will go. Where to get money for research and development?
      Quote: venaya
      while there is time, consider.
    6. Londa
      Londa 18 October 2015 18: 17 New
      0
      The word resolved is written with the letter E
      1. 97110
        97110 19 October 2015 08: 57 New
        +1
        Quote: Londa
        The word resolved is written with the letter E

        And it turns out "Roshen". Sweet and European.
    7. Sharapov
      Sharapov 18 October 2015 18: 25 New
      +8
      Vanek, what nah "r MECHANISM do you need? Everything is decided by denyushki ... Whoever pays is in power. Damn, fictitious Orthodox father, be a realist, live in the present, that is, denyushki .... push, don’t powder your brains .... In Bethlehem, the candle of Christ costs 1 dollar, and in our parishes the Orthodox priests push it for 3 bucks !!!!!!!!!!!! I checked it myself (I answer). they do not pay pensions while driving a BMW X6 - sadness and BARDAK ..
    8. bornikrub
      bornikrub 19 October 2015 14: 55 New
      +1
      It is a priority. Remember the assassination of Stalin and Beria during the Khrushchev coup.
      Mao: after the betrayal of Stalin by Soviet revisionists, the USSR is doomed.
    9. Wasiliy1985
      Wasiliy1985 19 October 2015 19: 51 New
      +1
      It is a streamlined mechanism for the transfer of power is one of the conditions for the stability of the state.

      IMHO: the SGA changes every four years a sign - state policy does not suffer from this.

      In some points I strongly disagree with I. Okhlobystin, but on points 2, 3, 4 I fully support!
  2. Homeland_SSSR
    Homeland_SSSR 18 October 2015 06: 14 New
    -34
    Rave! After Putin there will be another leader who will also defend the interests of the country and citizens of the Russian Federation. Demand creates supply. If in civil society there is a request for a strong leader, he will appear. And on the contrary, when society was weak and demoralized (in the 90s), its leaders were corresponding.
    1. Karasik
      Karasik 18 October 2015 06: 19 New
      -21
      Bravo, dear! Absolutely agree!
      1. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 18 October 2015 06: 28 New
        12
        Quote: Karasik
        Bravo, dear! Absolutely agree!

        with whom? could you indicate otherwise you might end up in an awkward situation ...
        1. Karasik
          Karasik 18 October 2015 06: 58 New
          20
          ... After Putin, there will be another leader who will also defend the interests of the country and the citizens of the Russian Federation ...

          The revival of the monarchy is a utopian idea. Continuity of politics is the key to the success of the state. No matter how the elections are held, whoever wins, the main directions of state policy should not change. I deeply respect Putin, and I understand that he is not eternal. Who will replace him? His son? Daughter? Well, revive the monarchy?
          He will be replaced by his PRINCIPAL. I really hope that Vladimir Vladimirovich has already prepared it.
    2. apro
      apro 18 October 2015 06: 21 New
      30
      Especially Dima Medvedev, this one will definitely leave and improve, the system wins and it is not all in manual mode, only pens sometimes come across playful.
      1. 44 World
        44 World 18 October 2015 07: 26 New
        +4
        How many red evaluations suggest that even at this forum of like-minded people, there are very different opinions ... what will happen when Putin leaves power without a worthy successor ???
      2. afdjhbn67
        afdjhbn67 18 October 2015 09: 21 New
        11
        Quote: apro
        Especially Dima Medvedev, this one will definitely leave and improve,


        By the way, if Dimona retouched a little - spilled Nicholas II, who so ineptly ruined the empire and his family .....
    3. udincev
      udincev 18 October 2015 06: 34 New
      +5
      Quote: Homeland_SSSR
      If in civil society there is a request for a strong leader, he will appear. And on the contrary, when society was weak and demoralized (in the 90s), its leaders were corresponding

      It can be understood that there was a request for society on Yeltsin?
      1. venaya
        venaya 18 October 2015 06: 37 New
        0
        Quote: udincev
        It can be understood that there was a request for society on Yeltsin?

        If you mean secret societies, then yes it was. It is advisable to clarify what kind of society you mean.
        1. AlNikolaich
          AlNikolaich 18 October 2015 10: 00 New
          14
          Quote: venaya
          Quote: udincev
          It can be understood that there was a request for society on Yeltsin?

          If you mean secret societies, then yes it was. It is advisable to clarify what kind of society you mean.

          So there was a request for Yeltsin! Remember, Yeltsin was associated with changes for the better,
          that Russia and America are finally friends, for world peace and universal prosperity.
          It is only necessary to be patient, a little bit. And in the Chubais voucher there was a belief that the Volga would be bought for him
          can be! There was a demand for MMM and the Russian Seleng house! Believed in a miracle, and received!
          Now we have become smart, pragmatic and priestly! We do not believe in promises, give the result!
          And look at the country 404, as frank fools! And twenty years ago, they were the same ...
          Only now, they filled the cones, and wised up immediately, and the neighbor looked at us, and learned nothing!
          And now they have their own Yeltsin-Waltzman ...
          1. saygon66
            saygon66 18 October 2015 18: 43 New
            +3
            - Yes, the request was not Gorbachev's with Yeltsin ... The request was for changes for the better! It just happened as in the saying of one people: "Do not ask for a new Tsar ...!"
          2. Kuzyakin15
            Kuzyakin15 18 October 2015 19: 42 New
            +4
            Quote: AlNikolaich
            Quote: venaya
            Quote: udincev
            It can be understood that there was a request for society on Yeltsin?

            If you mean secret societies, then yes it was. It is advisable to clarify what kind of society you mean.

            So there was a request for Yeltsin! Remember, Yeltsin was associated with changes for the better,
            that Russia and America are finally friends, for world peace and universal prosperity.
            It is only necessary to be patient, a little bit. And in the Chubais voucher there was a belief that the Volga would be bought for him
            can be! There was a demand for MMM and the Russian Seleng house! Believed in a miracle, and received!
            Now we have become smart, pragmatic and priestly! We do not believe in promises, give the result!
            And look at the country 404, as frank fools! And twenty years ago, they were the same ...
            Only now, they filled the cones, and wised up immediately, and the neighbor looked at us, and learned nothing!
            And now they have their own Yeltsin-Waltzman ...


            Well, if the EBN would at one time give the Russians a New Year's gift not in the form of GDP, but let's say in the form of the same DAM?
            And what would we do? I think NOTHING! They would have ached and cried and would have endured like EBN democracy, for it .....
            The fact of the matter is that we had a WIN in the political lottery.
            We are now overgrown with civic self-awareness, patriotism, and look down upon an uncluttered and any other riffraff, such as the Baltic states, a little down on top, as if the whole world themselves had blinded the President. If we are POWERFUL, then why can’t we hand or drive away Ed. Grew up. After all, everyone can see that the guys snickered elementary.
            Something like these thoughts, COMRADES ...
            1. skifd
              skifd 18 October 2015 19: 59 New
              +1
              Quote: Kuzyakin15
              Well, if the EBN would at one time give the Russians a New Year's gift not in the form of GDP, but let's say in the form of the same DAM?


              Here are the tree-sticks, well, how stable the belief in the "box" and "legends" is ... There was no "gift" from Yeltsin in the "form of GDP", there was - "surprise" for EBN ... And then, this one "surprise", arranged a lot of" unexpected children "for the" Yeltsinites "and the so-called" world community ", for which all these" brethren "mortally" fell in love "with him. smile
      2. Dart2027
        Dart2027 18 October 2015 11: 03 New
        +3
        Unfortunately yes. At that time, it was popularly accepted to blame the Soviet government, and often deservedly, believing that somewhere beyond the oceans an earthly paradise. I still remember, although it was very small.
    4. GRAY
      GRAY 18 October 2015 07: 31 New
      +3
      Quote: Homeland_SSSR
      Rave! After Putin there will be another leader who will also defend the interests of the country and citizens of the Russian Federation.

      This is possible, GDP just needs to be hinted at by the right dude. Although, I know one type (with an animal surname) in relation to which this number may not work, if it is natural without serious rehabilitation in the eyes of the people.
      In general, there should be two such people, according to the established pattern.
      1. afdjhbn67
        afdjhbn67 18 October 2015 09: 24 New
        +6
        Quote: GRAY
        In general, there should be two such people, according to the established pattern.


        According to established tradition, he should at least be hairy .. (bald Lenin-hairy Stalin.itd) laughing
        1. GRAY
          GRAY 18 October 2015 09: 44 New
          +3
          Quote: afdjhbn67
          According to established tradition, he should at least be hairy .. (bald Lenin-hairy Stalin.itd)

          This is not a tradition, but a trend. laughing
        2. BMW
          BMW 18 October 2015 11: 44 New
          +2
          Quote: afdjhbn67
          bald Lenin-hairy Stalin.itd

          Ha, and DAM hairy. There is nothing to guess. laughing
          1. afdjhbn67
            afdjhbn67 18 October 2015 11: 54 New
            +4
            spit, don’t fuck up .. can carry laughing
            1. BMW
              BMW 18 October 2015 13: 10 New
              +3
              Quote: afdjhbn67
              spit, don’t fuck up .. can carry

              Do not drift, I think the "alligators" are not so mentally retarded to exchange the GDP rating for a LADY. Although with these corporate "intellectuals" you can expect anything. Tfu, ugh, ugh. wink
          2. Imperial
            Imperial 18 October 2015 12: 13 New
            +9
            Ha, and DAM hairy. There is nothing to guess.
            God save us from this luntik-iPhone. Indeed, now in Syria, including him, de..mo we are raking.By the decision of the President of the Russian Federation D. Medvedev, by order of the Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation A. Serdyukov, in the summer of 2012 the apparatus of the chief military adviser in Syria was disbanded. Russian military experts returned to their homeland. Syria's military assistance has declined substantially. From the summer of 2012 to the fall of 2015, the Syrian government forces suffered the most severe defeats and lost most of the country's territory.
            1. BMW
              BMW 18 October 2015 13: 22 New
              +7
              Quote: Imperial
              God save us from this luntik-iPhone. Indeed, now in Syria, including him, de..mo

              Here is the proof of the "command". Why did the VVP LADY not correct it, because in a few months he became president. So this is the fault of the GDP, since the events you described took place during his time. Non-paste however. tongue
      2. taram taramych
        taram taramych 18 October 2015 09: 54 New
        -3
        Mr. Sobyanin, this is a subjective opinion. Well, Sergey Kozhegenovich, perhaps.
        1. liuk gud
          liuk gud 18 October 2015 10: 37 New
          +3
          I like Lavrov
        2. Strezhevchanin
          Strezhevchanin 18 October 2015 11: 25 New
          0
          Quote: taram taramych
          Mr. Sobyanin, this is a subjective opinion. Well, Sergey Kozhegenovich, perhaps.

          You do not even recognize this person, but the command will not initially change. I believe that the successor has long been ready; I proceed from the number of attempts.
      3. Born in the USSR
        Born in the USSR 18 October 2015 12: 44 New
        0
        Quote: GRAY
        This is possible, GDP just needs to be hinted

        Still, not GDP, but VV Putin
        Have respect!
        Here, on the forum, everything is lined with bricks if God forbid you turn to "you", and such neglect is to the Great Leader of the Great Country ...
        1. Greenwood
          Greenwood 18 October 2015 13: 08 New
          -1
          Everyone has their own opinion about Putin’s personality, and everyone can call him whatever he wants: even Putin, at least GDP, at least Vova, at least Krabe. So tie it.
          1. Born in the USSR
            Born in the USSR 19 October 2015 06: 23 New
            0
            Quote: Greenwood
            Everyone has their own opinion about Putin’s personality, and everyone can call him whatever he wants: even Putin, at least GDP, at least Vova, at least Krabe. So tie it.

            Neither speaks much of the attitude, but rather of who you are and what your upbringing is ... Think about it.
        2. andj61
          andj61 18 October 2015 19: 20 New
          -2
          Quote: born_in_cssr
          Still, not GDP, but VV Putin
          Have respect!
          Here, on the forum, everything is lined with bricks if God forbid you turn to "you", and such neglect is to the Great Leader of the Great Country ...

          good + 100500!
    5. Angro Magno
      Angro Magno 18 October 2015 08: 25 New
      +6
      There is a demand for a new leader. Suggestions do not watch.
    6. The comment was deleted.
    7. APASUS
      APASUS 18 October 2015 10: 33 New
      +2
      Quote: Homeland_SSSR
      If in civil society there is a request for a strong leader, he will appear

      After the humiliation and insult inflicted on Germany by the Versailles Treaty, society simply longed for a strong leader and it received him in the person of Hitler, we will not write about the results ..........
      What is your statement based on?
    8. Stelth1985
      Stelth1985 20 October 2015 05: 55 New
      +1
      Not. You are absolutely wrong. The desires of the people and the desires of princely parasites never coincide. Vova is a gebist. He's from an old school, but he has to spin. Indeed, from all sides there are different groups. And in order to change and raise the country, all these groups must be cut literally. Even children should not be left. That is, it requires a TOTAL reformatization of the entire vertical of power, the political system, society, vectors of politics, the restructuring of the army, and much more. This is a total scrapping of everything, destruction. And then after the selection of people of duty, people of service to the Motherland ... simply put, people of purpose, a sharp rise in the whole country. It takes at least 10 years after the internal war, which is inevitable. Wait for 2017. Soon.

      For the Honor and Glory of the ancestors!
  3. Karasik
    Karasik 18 October 2015 06: 15 New
    -4
    I don’t even know the minus or plus to put the article. Ivan, you are a good, talented actor. Do not meddle in politics!
    1. Karabanov
      Karabanov 18 October 2015 07: 54 New
      +4
      It is also unclear what he wanted to say ... He piled everything together, and Putin, and the burial of Lenin, the revival of the monarchy, and passports with nationalities, and the leading role of the Russian Orthodox Church in combination with death for pedophiles ... Some kind of welter.
      Okhlobystin is a wonderful actor, director, screenwriter, writer. He is certainly a patriot and his civic position deserves respect. But politics is not his thing.
      1. Gardamir
        Gardamir 18 October 2015 08: 15 New
        10
        Heaped everything in a heap
        That is the point, if you first shout out glory to Putin, then at the same time any question will crawl through
      2. DEMENTIY
        DEMENTIY 18 October 2015 08: 26 New
        +3
        Quote: Karabanov
        It is also unclear what he wanted to say ...


        Why is that incomprehensible? A man would like to eat a fish (monarchy for GDP - power is not limited) and not soak his legs (this is so that his "smerda" opinion stated in paragraphs 2-5 was taken into account), but it will not work out like that. He (Okhlobystin) the words of Maria Antoineta (finished on the guillotine by the way) should be reminded - "If the people do not have enough bread, then let them eat cakes" ...
      3. sa-ag
        sa-ag 18 October 2015 08: 41 New
        +9
        Quote: Karabanov
        and the burial of Lenin, the revival of the monarchy, and passports with nationalities, and the leading role of the Russian Orthodox Church in combination with death for pedophiles ... Some kind of welter.

        Yes, this trend is now observed in some minds - to plump in 1913 (well, approximately) :-) in general, the era of Nicholas II, as if it would change everything by a twink of an eye, people build illusions, regardless of the age of the type "here comes the master - master will judge us ", I advise Nekrasov to read on this occasion" Reflections at the front entrance "" ... And the owner of luxurious chambers
        Even a dream was deeply embraced ...
        You who consider enviable life
        Rapture with shameless flattery
        Dragging, gluttony, game,
        Wake up! There is still pleasure:
        Rotate them! their salvation is in you!
        But happy deafs to good ...
        Thunders of heaven do not fear you,
        And you hold the earth in your hands
        And these people are unknown
        Inexperienced grief in hearts. "

        in my opinion is not outdated
        1. Altona
          Altona 18 October 2015 12: 31 New
          +6
          Quote: sa-ag
          Yes, this trend is now observed in some minds - to plump in 1913 (well, approximately) :-) in general, the era of Nicholas II, as if it would change everything by a twink of an eye, people build illusions, regardless of the age of the type "here comes the master - master will judge us "

          ------------------------
          Yes, and "sacralization" will not work now, and the ROC in the role of the CPSU was already 100 years ago, with pomp they celebrated the 300th anniversary of the Romanov dynasty and wished "eternal summer", and then war, revolution, the Ipatiev House and the Civil War .. .If Ivan wants to turn back this bloody wheel, then it’s probably completely in vain, it won’t give anything ... The leader cannot be grown in a test tube and then presented to the people, the leader will come out of the midst of the people, history will decide ... The democratic system can only give out political "miscarriages", the extradition of the leader is not at all guaranteed by it ...
      4. afdjhbn67
        afdjhbn67 18 October 2015 09: 29 New
        +6
        Quote: Karabanov
        Okhlobystin is a wonderful actor, director, screenwriter, writer.


        He also impressed me more as a doctor than a politician ..
  4. tankovod
    tankovod 18 October 2015 06: 22 New
    19
    To begin with, let this Orthodox Church restore its reputation, otherwise people call it ROC CJSC, and its priests business priests. This organization has long deserved the same purges and executions / landings as the bureaucracy.
    A hundred peoples live in Russia and many have their own religion, everyone needs to be respected, and not Ukrainians should be likened to their Ukrainization and division on this basis
    In general, they’re already tired of imposing religion, the question of faith is everyone’s personal choice, it’s inside, and not at the show, an obese pig in a cassock who messes on the road on a Mercedes, has no right to teach us how to live.
    1. GRAY
      GRAY 18 October 2015 07: 49 New
      +7
      Quote: tankovod
      and then the people call it the Russian Orthodox Church,

      People do not call it that, believing people both went to church and go.
      This name came from those who pray for a senior manager, but they don’t go to church - only to the office.
    2. Gardamir
      Gardamir 18 October 2015 08: 17 New
      +3
      business priests.
      It's just that the business president has a better PR company.
    3. saygon66
      saygon66 18 October 2015 18: 59 New
      +2
      - Negligent priests in no way can personify the Church, and even more so the Faith ... I agree, Faith is an intimate matter ... to a certain limit - there, "Igishi" also, like they believe! Here the Church acts as one of the "pillars of the State", such as the Army, Justice, etc. Otherwise, we will come to "European values": A person is human, homosexual is homosexual ...
  5. free
    free 18 October 2015 06: 24 New
    49
    3. Waiver of death penalty moratorium for pedophiles and serial killers.

    4. Deprivation of electoral rights of representatives of sexual minorities, as mentally ill people. (Which is obvious)



    with two hands for!
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 18 October 2015 06: 29 New
      +6
      Quote: free
      3. Waiver of death penalty moratorium for pedophiles and serial killers.

      4. Deprivation of electoral rights of representatives of sexual minorities, as mentally ill people. (Which is obvious)



      with two hands for!

      perhaps besides 1 point, I agree with Ivan ...
      1. The comment was deleted.
  6. horoh
    horoh 18 October 2015 06: 29 New
    10
    But Okhlobystin is right, alternatives to our GDP have not yet been observed.
    1. venaya
      venaya 18 October 2015 06: 33 New
      +4
      Quote: horoh
      alternatives to our GDP have not yet been observed.

      Agree, you still need to cook, so as not to be in an awkward situation.
      1. horoh
        horoh 18 October 2015 06: 36 New
        0
        Are you talking about that?
        1. venaya
          venaya 18 October 2015 06: 45 New
          +5
          Quote: horoh
          Are you talking about that?

          Naturally about the prospect, our past shows us little examples of grandiose collapses in relation to state administration. For now, let’s omit the experience of mistakes of other countries, but after all, at least in our experience, you also have to learn. Or do you disagree with this?
          1. horoh
            horoh 18 October 2015 06: 59 New
            +1
            I agree, and I need to learn from my own experience. But at the moment in our country there is a person who will compete with the GDP? Although today there are a lot of questions regarding GDP, and this is already related to domestic policy.
            1. venaya
              venaya 18 October 2015 07: 10 New
              +5
              Quote: horoh
              To date, there are a lot of issues to GDP, and this is with regards to domestic policy.

              So you answered. What is needed is not a separate personality, but a whole school of high-class managers, this is not one person, and they must be with a wide age range. Something similar happened in the USSR, but as you know, the school is not quite successful, in view of subsequent events.
              1. horoh
                horoh 18 October 2015 07: 35 New
                +3
                We have highly qualified specialists, especially in the field of economics. Such as professor Gubanov, academician Glazyev, etc. But the question is different, what does the GDP give instead of the Siluanovs and the Ulyukaevs and the like, to put precisely these people in the responsible posts?
                1. venaya
                  venaya 18 October 2015 08: 13 New
                  +2
                  Quote: horoh
                  What does not give the GDP instead of the Siluanovs and the Ulyukaevs and the like there to put precisely these people on the responsible posts?

                  It seems that you yourself answered here that it is precisely that which prevents the gross domestic product from being put on important posts. You know, and personal experience, I came under one very unsuccessful decree for the country, greatly undermining the country's economy. At first, I hastened to blame Putin on this ... but it didn’t work, I realized. I realized that it’s not really his fault, the system is to blame, the very system that prevents us and him from working. It only seems to many that Putin is omnipotent, but this is far from the case, to be sure of this is simple, just turn on the TV, and understand what kind of mess we live in.
                  1. BMW
                    BMW 18 October 2015 11: 49 New
                    +5
                    Quote: venaya
                    I realized that it’s not really his fault, the system is to blame, the very system that prevents us and him from working.

                    The question is, who supports and strengthens this system?
                2. Uncle Joe
                  Uncle Joe 19 October 2015 05: 01 New
                  +2
                  Quote: horoh
                  But the question is different, what does the GDP give instead of the Siluanovs and the Ulyukaevs and the like, to put precisely these people in the responsible posts?
                  Goals.
              2. sa-ag
                sa-ag 18 October 2015 08: 03 New
                10
                Quote: venaya
                Something similar happened in the USSR, but as you know, the school is not quite successful, in view of subsequent events.

                There are no ideal schools, but the USSR had the best management school compared to the current school of management, at least I have not heard that "dear Leonid Ilyich" intervened in the management of the railway :-)
            2. Karabanov
              Karabanov 18 October 2015 08: 13 New
              +6
              Quote: horoh
              I agree, and I need to learn from my own experience. But at the moment in our country there is a person who will compete with the GDP?

              In a country with a population of 140 million people, in addition to GDP, apparently there is no more intelligent and devoted to the ideals of great Russia patriot. Revival of the cult of personality?
        2. 97110
          97110 19 October 2015 09: 28 New
          0
          Quote: horoh
          Are you talking about that?

          Yes, everything about
          Quote: horoh
          Alternatives to our GDP
      2. afdjhbn67
        afdjhbn67 18 October 2015 09: 33 New
        +3
        Quote: venaya
        Agree, you still need to cook, so as not to be in an awkward situation.


        but surely it’s getting ready already, unless a transfer of power occurs spontaneously - a palace coup, etc. and it seems to me that this will not be a dimon-iphone .. (God forbid)
        1. venaya
          venaya 18 October 2015 10: 25 New
          0
          Quote: afdjhbn67
          Yes, surely it’s getting ready already, unless a transfer of power occurs spontaneously - a palace coup, etc.

          The wrong word is being prepared, the media around the world are just repeating this. I met with foreigners, so they directly said: "when you change your Putin", this is something. That is, they are interested in changing and they are confidently repeating this, but we are out of work. And why are we not so brazenly changing their heads of state? I don't understand, I have to learn. If we do not deal with this issue, then they will deal with us, too.
    2. vovanpain
      vovanpain 18 October 2015 07: 30 New
      13
      Quote: horoh
      But Okhlobystin is right, alternatives to our GDP have not yet been observed.

      Ivan is right, you still can’t see alternatives to GDP, you don’t have an iPhone, you don’t clone Shoigu, but you need to prepare now, the Russian Orthodox Church was better off as it was and will be separated, Russia is a multinational country and God should be in everyone’s heart ,
      1. Gardamir
        Gardamir 18 October 2015 08: 27 New
        +3
        , no alternative to GDP yet,
        Well, well, and Dmitry Anatolyevich, the great Putin himself recently deigned to award him with the order.
        1. novobranets
          novobranets 18 October 2015 13: 48 New
          -1
          Quote: Gardamir
          the great Putin himself deigned to award the order.

          For the fact that he sits quietly, and does not climb into governing the country. Immediately I will answer the question, "what for then keep it"? I have no idea. request Maybe instead of furniture.
    3. Hey
      Hey 18 October 2015 09: 42 New
      +2
      Let us recall the last days on the "throne" of EBN, who assumed that he would choose such a successor, and not his own kind.
  7. BLOND
    BLOND 18 October 2015 06: 29 New
    +1
    p.p. 3 and 4 non-supporting
    The rest also has a rational kernel!


    Karasik (1) SU  Today, 06:15 New


    I don’t even know if it’s a minus or plus to put an article. Ivan, you are a good, talented actor. Do not meddle in politics

    You just know him only as an actor ...
    1. meriem1
      meriem1 18 October 2015 07: 09 New
      0
      It is better to be "such an actor" than such an "analyst" like you !!!

      The theses of Okhlobystin are not without controversy. But nevertheless, he does not go into any politics, but clearly expresses an idea !!!
      I like someone or don't like me - it doesn't matter. In the end, I'm not a ruble, so everyone likes it. And I can’t conceal my opinion without risking to disappoint myself once again. Conscience does not allow. After all, for something the Lord gave me the opportunity to be heard by so many people.


      There is simply no real replacement for Putin. All Liberastic attempts (right 15%) the majority hears. Especially the screech of the insane Kasparov, who did not learn to play the hypocrite and says exactly what they (the liberals) think and would like. So, if for the minority, Democracy, this is eating jamon while spreading the rolls ... Well, let it be. But only without US !!! We have a free country, in contrast to their 90s.
      1. Gardamir
        Gardamir 18 October 2015 08: 29 New
        +6
        Putin simply doesn’t. All Liberal
        You are too lazy to look for a video where Putin says that "Russia is doomed to liberalism."
        1. BMW
          BMW 18 October 2015 11: 53 New
          +5
          Quote: Gardamir
          You are too lazy to look for a video where Putin says that "Russia is doomed to liberalism."

          Glushnyak full, that in the forehead, that spelled. They don’t want to hear, they started as a mantra.
      2. Weyland
        Weyland 18 October 2015 15: 21 New
        0
        Quote: meriem1
        this is eating jamon while spreading the rolls ...


        The word "jamon" evokes other associations for me. For example, with a (as a rule) winding line on one long, slightly curved object, the quality of which, according to the national tradition of its manufacturers, would be nice to test on gentlemen liberals wink
  8. lexx2038
    lexx2038 18 October 2015 06: 33 New
    18
    I would like to hope that the next leader will not be inferior to the current one, the Americans learned a lesson, and if Russia falls into the abyss of Gorbachev-Yeltsin-Medvedev again, they will no longer allow us to rise from our knees. We only show weakness, they will begin to destroy us at the root, so that there is no one to resurrect.
  9. Alexdark
    Alexdark 18 October 2015 06: 59 New
    +8
    "There is no intelligible mechanism capable of Russia guaranteeing the appearance of the next leader"It scares, scares more than any threats. This is worse than any threat, seriously. Remember Yeltsin, the sucking pendo * lyadsky, Gorbachenok, ParAshenka, and others ...
  10. viscount
    viscount 18 October 2015 07: 06 New
    0
    With such a rating as that of our President, if he suddenly comes up with the initiative for his coronation, then I will support him with both hands and I think that at least a third of Russians will do the same !!!
    1. Karabanov
      Karabanov 18 October 2015 08: 19 New
      +4
      Quote: Viscount
      if suddenly comes out with the initiative for his coronation, then I will support with both hands

      Well, it started ... Why trifle, you must immediately to the emperors! And we will write you in pages.
      1. sa-ag
        sa-ag 18 October 2015 08: 24 New
        +2
        Quote: Karabanov
        Why trifle, you must immediately to the emperors!

        And the world will not see Zhirinovsky in the chamberlains of His Majesty, a farce :-)
        1. Weyland
          Weyland 18 October 2015 15: 23 New
          -1
          Quote: sa-ag
          the world will not see more farce :-)


          Well, well ... Zhirinovsky is 10 times smarter than you - judging by the fact that you did not even manage to master the third button on the left laughing
        2. Weyland
          Weyland 18 October 2015 15: 24 New
          -1
          Quote: sa-ag
          the world will not see more farce :-)


          Well, well ... Zhirinovsky is 10 times smarter than you - judging by the fact that you did not even manage to master the third button on the left laughing
      2. BMW
        BMW 18 October 2015 11: 55 New
        +1
        Quote: Karabanov
        And we will write you in pages.

        To the slaves. laughing
    2. ALEA IACTA EST
      ALEA IACTA EST 18 October 2015 17: 45 New
      -3
      An emperor elected for 10 years an unlimited number of times.
      The most for Russia: moderately democratic, moderately authoritarian!
  11. The lead
    The lead 18 October 2015 07: 14 New
    +5
    The article raises very urgent problems of the role of the individual, the importance of social elevators, and the state system. This is due to the unworked state system. 1. The author suggests reflecting on the restoration of the monarchy, but the idea of ​​the monarchy is not popular in society. Democracy is indeed a great achievement of civil society, when every citizen has the right to vote in the elections of the highest authority and the rejection of this right is a crime. As far as the personality of the GDP is concerned, not everything is so straightforward, on the external front the situation is normal, but on the internal side it either comes with a creak or there is no change for the better. Of course, against the background of humpbacked and Yeltsin GDP looks like a messiah, but in reality it lacks stars from the sky, IMHO. It is quite possible to discuss the lifting of the limit on the number of presidential terms so that the head of state, popular in society, can be elected by the people as many times as the people consider necessary. As for social elevators, here the government exerts serious pressure on potential political competitors, using media, etc. means, therefore, the idea of ​​some kind of exclusivity of GDP and the illusion of a lack of wii him a worthy change. 2. I support, it is necessary to remove the cemetery from Red Square, however, the body of Lenin (like others) must be solemnly transferred to a new mausoleum outside the city and continue to be preserved. 3. It’s not obvious to me. It is necessary to deprive the electoral rights of the official recognition of their sexual perversity. Also prohibit the propaganda or demonstration of sexual abuse in the media and kompigra.
    1. Karabanov
      Karabanov 18 October 2015 08: 34 New
      12
      Quote: Lead
      As for social elevators, here the government exerts serious pressure on potential political competitors, using the media and other means, which is why it creates an idea of ​​some kind of exceptional GDP and the illusion of the absence of a worthy change.

      I often try to prove this to my opponents, but most do not hear how they memorized the learned mantra that there is no replacement for GDP ...
      I am not against GDP, I am for development, for the evolution of power. But the current system does not suggest an alternative, while turning itself into a snickering bureaucratic swamp. Where does this alternative come from, if any movement that is at least somehow threatening with the loss of the place of current officials is stopped and does not develop?
      1. The lead
        The lead 18 October 2015 11: 19 New
        +8
        The site administration is pro-government here, if it allows criticism of domestic policy, then a constructive analysis of foreign policy is taboo, only a positive assessment is allowed. Accordingly, people who share their political position are grouped on the forum. So, two years ago there were comments suggesting to introduce Syria is an armed unit of the Russian army and a wave of criticism and minuses has clearly gone, such as losses will be inevitable, coffins, etc. will go, and now these minusculers (I remember them) in the forefront sing an assana to our glorious falcons flying in the sky of Syria. Such is life.
        1. Karabanov
          Karabanov 18 October 2015 12: 40 New
          +7
          Quote: Lead
          So, two years ago there were comments suggesting the introduction of an armed unit of the Russian army into Syria and a wave of criticism and minuses went clearly, such as losses will be inevitable, coffins, etc. will go, and now these minuscule people (I remember them) are in the forefront they sing the Assan to our glorious falcons flying in the sky of Syria. Such is life.

          This "weathering" (if not worse) is ubiquitous here. Many simply do not have their own opinion as such. They perceive any attitudes descending from above as prosperity and a panacea for solving certain issues, while not trying to analyze or critically look at the situation. They sing in unison and maintain the existing order so that they do not throw it out - we approve ... And then angrily grumbling with saliva, they curse all Serdyukovs, Vasilievs, Horoshavins and others like them ... politicians, not thinking that these characters are miscarriages from the same nest ... Hmm.
          Such is life, such are people.
      2. BMW
        BMW 18 October 2015 11: 59 New
        +5
        Quote: Karabanov
        most do not hear and how they memorized the mantra that GDP replacement does not exist ...

        Although a few thinking people were found, the rest are naturally either zombies or beneficiaries. wink
    2. tracer
      tracer 19 October 2015 10: 09 New
      +2
      I never cease to wonder how accurately other people can express thoughts as two drops of water similar to their own. The idea of ​​the monarchy is out of date, out of date, and precisely as an economic model of development. The extension of the presidency is just as much as the majority of the people living in our country wish, in my opinion, is that lifesaver capable of becoming some kind of intermediate model on the way ... On the way to what ...? I’ll try to express the idea globally, because I myself can’t formulate it in detail so far. On the way ... to a system of power that is most consistent with the requirements of an economic and political nature in this particular period of civilization development. It seems to me that the state administration system should change. Like Darwin, animals adapt to their environment. If it becomes numb, in one form or another, it is doomed. You can call it anything you like, but I think that my idea is clear. I have not been to Moscow and Russia for ten years now. Now here I admire the view of the Arbat. The beauty and power of my homeland in every building and street is visible in the palm of my hand (I do not mean the restored facades of buildings and the lack of advertising). And for those who do not notice how Russia and Moscow have changed as the capital of a huge country, I can say the following. The changes are enormous, it’s just a different country compared to it, but 10-20 years ago. Many do not notice this, just like they do not notice how their own children grow and change. But the positive changes are huge. It can only mean one thing. This is the most correct model of government today, taking into account all the features of the development of society today. And above all, successes in foreign policy are visible. No autonomous domestic policy will ever exist without a strong foreign ... NEVER !!!
    3. The comment was deleted.
  12. nikolaev
    nikolaev 18 October 2015 07: 14 New
    +6
    The problem exists. It needs to be addressed. History, spirituality and science are the foundation of the solution.
    Mechanisms must be developed to protect society from the power of money.
    The formation of the corps of managers from childhood from the most gifted and strong children of the whole country, of all nationalities and religions.
    The main religion is a strong progressive secular country with a powerful spiritual basis of cultural and religious heritage.
    It must be the work of the elite. Not pseudo-elite-money bags, not crooked pop and film stars, but ELITES - scientists, military, engineers, economists
    , writers, public and political figures who have earned the trust of the country by their deeds, and not by chatter, like Kudrin and K.
    A series of referenda to consolidate developments in the form of laws.
    The referendum mechanism should be brought to scientific non-inertial perfection and should be the main law of the country.
    as an example, the law on the recall of deputies has not been adopted or does not work anywhere. What kind of democracy or the influence of the people on power can be discussed in this case !? Money qualification for participation in elections should be prohibited, moreover, at a certain level of income, participation in elections should be excluded, because a person who has learned to earn good money for himself and will continue to do this while in power. Who knows the exceptions?
    ......
    1. The lead
      The lead 18 October 2015 07: 38 New
      -3
      Quote: nikolaev
      Problem exists
      What is the problem?
      Quote: nikolaev
      History, spirituality and science are the foundation of the solution.
      Platitudes.
      Quote: nikolaev
      Mechanisms must be developed to protect society from the power of money.
      Why and how? Communism to build?
      Quote: nikolaev
      The main religion is a strong progressive secular country with a powerful spiritual basis of cultural and religious heritage.
      Some kind of nonsense. Religion is what religion a person professes.
      1. sa-ag
        sa-ag 18 October 2015 07: 58 New
        +4
        Quote: Lead
        Why and how? Communism to build?

        Not a bad idea, but the power of money is the production of money, i.e. speculative operations on the exchange or loan interest in banks, rather than production of consumer goods
        1. The lead
          The lead 18 October 2015 08: 22 New
          +1
          Quote: sa-ag
          Not a bad idea
          It's not about whether the idea of ​​building communism is bad or not, Nikolayev wrote a bad comment, and even with a pretense and inflated self-importance. I fully admit that the expression "the power of money" can have different meanings, for example, if we take into account the topic of the article, the influence of money on electoral process.
  13. Motherland Russia
    Motherland Russia 18 October 2015 07: 22 New
    0
    I hope that the receiver will be all right.
    I am sure that V.V. is also reflecting on this subject.
    1. Gardamir
      Gardamir 18 October 2015 08: 40 New
      +2
      VV also ponders on this subject.
      God forbid! This is that further "optimization" of education and medicine will continue, the replacement of the Russian language by Americanisms and illiterate people such as "vrazy". Then certainly retire from the age of 90 ...
    2. ALEA IACTA EST
      ALEA IACTA EST 18 October 2015 17: 48 New
      +3
      Quote: Motherland Russia
      receiver

      Why did people dislike the word "successor" so much? request
  14. evil partisan
    evil partisan 18 October 2015 07: 24 New
    0
    Stop the panic, Vanya! Putin will steer another 29 years yes. And there his sons will grow up ... repeat
    1. kil 31
      kil 31 18 October 2015 08: 22 New
      +5
      Quote: wicked partisan
      Stop the panic, Vanya! Putin will steer another 29 years yes. And there his sons will grow up ... repeat

      Maybe all the same grandchildren, because he has a daughter. hi
      1. evil partisan
        evil partisan 18 October 2015 08: 27 New
        +3
        Quote: keel 31
        because he has a daughter.

        Are you fully aware of his personal life? repeat
        1. kil 31
          kil 31 18 October 2015 09: 15 New
          +2
          Quote: wicked partisan
          Quote: keel 31
          because he has a daughter.

          Are you fully aware of his personal life? repeat

          Not really your musician? Although it does not converge, you said after 29 years. A citizen who has reached the age of 35 can become president. So now the child is 6 years old. laughing hi
          1. evil partisan
            evil partisan 18 October 2015 10: 00 New
            +1
            Quote: keel 31
            So now the child is 6 years old.

            Not a fact, oh not a fact ... repeat
            Quote: keel 31
            Not really your musician?
            sad
            1. kil 31
              kil 31 18 October 2015 10: 11 New
              +1
              Quote: wicked partisan
              Quote: keel 31
              So now the child is 6 years old.

              Not a fact, oh not a fact ... repeat
              Quote: keel 31
              Not really your musician?
              sad

              I got it! I know how to keep secrets. wink I hope then something breaks off. I also hope that not the cervical vertebrae. lol
              1. andj61
                andj61 18 October 2015 19: 23 New
                0
                Quote: keel 31
                I got it! I know how to keep secrets. I hope then something breaks off. I also hope that not the cervical vertebrae.

                Blessed is he who believes - it is easy for him in the world! fellow hi
          2. taram taramych
            taram taramych 18 October 2015 10: 09 New
            +4
            Following the "sons of lt Schmidt," one should expect the appearance laughing "grandchildren of the GDP"!
  15. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 18 October 2015 07: 33 New
    +7
    Quote: free

    3. Waiver of death penalty moratorium for pedophiles and serial killers.

    4. Deprivation of electoral rights of representatives of sexual minorities, as mentally ill people. (Which is obvious)

    I would add. The death penalty for terrorists. At present, it is already an urgent need.
  16. kebeskin
    kebeskin 18 October 2015 07: 38 New
    -3
    Shoigu for president and all.
    1. Karabin
      Karabin 18 October 2015 09: 04 New
      +5
      Quote: kebeskin
      Shoigu for president and all.

      Well then, "pinochetki" not only in the Ministry of Emergencies and the Ministry of Defense, but also in the civil service and in educational institutions will become mandatory.
    2. Kovlad
      Kovlad 18 October 2015 09: 10 New
      +4
      Kuzhugetovich is also far from a young man.
    3. ALEA IACTA EST
      ALEA IACTA EST 18 October 2015 17: 51 New
      +1
      Quote: kebeskin
      Shoigu for president

      He is not a politician. In addition, he is needed at the Ministry of Defense. And he’s already middle-aged ...
  17. kasimsot
    kasimsot 18 October 2015 07: 44 New
    -1
    The Orthodox State (VKS) opposes the Islamic State (terrorists). Oh, I'm not cold-blooded, or? Not no . Is it me or not? In the report, too, the conclusion is, well, for posterity there or people like me and Okhlobystin
  18. Dalmatia
    Dalmatia 18 October 2015 07: 54 New
    +1
    It would be better if the continuation of the Interns was removed)))
  19. sa-ag
    sa-ag 18 October 2015 07: 55 New
    +6
    "... The era of" temporary workers "will sink into oblivion, the era of" zealous owners "will come."
    Such big and the same illusions as they sawed the budget and will be sawed, because they don’t know the other, and it’s a lot of quickly and immediately

    "... But the president is not eternal. It is a fact, just like the fact that there is no intelligible mechanism capable of Russia guaranteeing the emergence of the next leader with the same outstanding talents as the current President."

    No, I don’t need such talents, Putin succeeds in foreign policy, maybe he’s a good foreign minister, this is the maximum - to make a good impression on investors, but as a president he is responsible for domestic policy as well, because in domestic politics he either manual control in emergency cases, as in the case of electric trains, or there is a division of spheres of influence in exchange for loyalty, which, as a full-fledged president, is not a good sign. We need a president with a team. who will build a management and control system that will work according to the developed rules and will not require "more manual management" (C), from the point of view of managing something, be it a mechanism or a team, this is evidence of the weakness of the manager himself
  20. Stinger
    Stinger 18 October 2015 07: 56 New
    -2
    There is no intelligible mechanism capable of Russia guaranteeing the appearance of the next leader ...


    There is such a mechanism. Rods! Since school. This is better than a return to the death penalty.
  21. Magadan
    Magadan 18 October 2015 07: 59 New
    +4
    I support Okhlobystin in everything. I am also for the Monarchy. The president is like a temporary worker. There, Yeltsin’s daughter (the one who had a scandal about 20 billion in the Bank of New York), lives quietly in Austria. What Yeltsin did to the country, we remember everything. And why? Yes, because the President can be stupidly BUY. He only had to hang out for 8-10 years, and then even though the grass does not grow.
    The Monarch has a completely different "selfish interest". His children live and rule in the country. The same type, who does not possess anything in England, Elizabeth, such as Yeltsin in her England would not allow. I would go out on TV and address the nation in the spirit of "Guys, you see what kind of freak you have chosen for yourself"!
    And the most interesting thing is that those transnational corporations that are interested in destroying states are passing on their power by inheritance to their children. They just have a monarchy. And against them are some temporary presidents who are for "national interests". Yeah, schaz.
    In general, if we do not want the next leader, a corrupt traitor, then let's think about the restoration of the Monarchy. Let it be limited. Let in Russia, for example, the Monarch be responsible for Justice and for Culture with Education. In general, he is engaged in Public Saving and Justice.
    I see that Putin is clearly not a traitor, but who guarantees the future to us? Who can prove to me that the President cannot be bought stupidly?
    1. Gardamir
      Gardamir 18 October 2015 08: 46 New
      0
      You can stupidly BUY the President.
      Remember the number two? ..
      1. BMW
        BMW 18 October 2015 12: 09 New
        +3
        Quote: Gardamir
        Remember the number two?

        This is simply not a site for those who are interested in the army, but some kind of club of manarchists. I'm just in shock belay
    2. Karabin
      Karabin 18 October 2015 09: 11 New
      +8
      Quote: Magadan
      Yes, because the President can be stupidly BUY.

      But you don’t need to spend money on a fool-monarch. The term of the purchased president is limited by the Constitution, the monarch rules until the end of his days or until the palace coup. So why fence the garden?
  22. question
    question 18 October 2015 08: 12 New
    +2
    Okhlobystin is right, it's time to think about a worthy successor. Monarchy is not an option; it will have to change too much, including the constitution and worldview of people. So, it is necessary to choose people who are happy in all thoughts (advice)! And to eliminate errors, develop some kind of effective mechanism. And then there will be options. But, everything rests against money! He who has money will sell his own! In general, this is such a tangle that you’ll break your head!
    1. Jurkovs
      Jurkovs 18 October 2015 08: 51 New
      0
      Quote: question
      will have to change too much, including the constitution and worldview of people

      virtually nothing needs to be changed. Record in the Constitution that the monarch is representative power, the commander of the Guard and the executor of the decisions of the Constitutional Court, and peace will come to Russia.
  23. tchoni
    tchoni 18 October 2015 08: 25 New
    -1
    Oh nonsense ... Give them the monarchy. Until a monolithic Alegarchic group takes an interest in its survival, and not in the dough as such, nothing, including monarchy and autocracy, will help. And, it seems to me that such a group is now at the helm ....
    1. Jurkovs
      Jurkovs 18 October 2015 08: 48 New
      +2
      Quote: tchoni
      Until the monolithic allegarchic group stands at the helm of the country

      The history of Russia has never known such a thing, but it has known numerous manifestations of the "seven-boyarism".
      1. Banshee
        Banshee 18 October 2015 10: 19 New
        -1
        A merchant 1 guild?
    2. BMW
      BMW 18 October 2015 12: 12 New
      +1
      Quote: tchoni
      And, it seems to me that such a group is now at the helm ..

      Absolutely right wink
    3. saygon66
      saygon66 18 October 2015 21: 46 New
      +1
      -So the monarchy also falls into this definition ... The monolithic oligarchic group is the ruling dynasty (the family, which is much more monolithic - blood relatives) and others like them! Nobody is more interested in the existence of the state (there is drinking, dressing for something), but for drank the monarch's dough - on the rack, at least ... Question of terminology? smile
  24. fest 1973
    fest 1973 18 October 2015 08: 29 New
    -3
    I agree with everything, I’ll add on my own, it is necessary to introduce GDP to the Hero of Russia!
    1. Karabanov
      Karabanov 18 October 2015 09: 28 New
      0
      As an option, it is possible to canonize (albeit in life), there are also proposals for the coronation ...
  25. Hubun
    Hubun 18 October 2015 08: 33 New
    -1
    And that, in principle, I agree. Here the monarchy somehow confuses
  26. Mercury
    Mercury 18 October 2015 08: 43 New
    +2
    It’s not necessary to change anything. People in Britain do not worry about themselves and the king doesn’t bother the Saudis, and a lot of countries are still friends with the monarchy, and we have a bunch of fagots in the 90s instilled a love for false freedom which, in fact, is only on paper, but in fact we just change the name and to fix the constitution. the emperor will wake up instead of the president the Russian empire will wake up instead of the federation. I think the people will only wake up. the patriotic rise will wake up.
    1. Karabanov
      Karabanov 18 October 2015 09: 37 New
      +4
      Quote: Mercury
      people in Britain live their own life and the king doesn’t bother the Saudis and a lot of countries are still friends with the monarchy

      Well, modern European monarchies, purely decorative ... They have no power. So a tribute to tradition, no more. But the Arab sheikhs, just the same, have absolute power.
      1. AlexeyL
        AlexeyL 19 October 2015 16: 12 New
        0
        Do you think the Queen of England is a decoration? I do not think so. Well, if there were only England, but Canada, Australia, etc. And is this all the scenery? I doubt it.
  27. Jurkovs
    Jurkovs 18 October 2015 08: 45 New
    -2
    The sacralization mechanism has long been known and even tested. This is Zemsky Sobor. The question is, but who will we choose as autocrats? And after all there is some sense in autocracy in our difficult time. Well, how to reconcile the Russians with the Ukrainians? How to try on our Eagle with their Trident? My personal suggestion. In Russia, there are still descendants of Rurik, these are the princes Meshchersky, the princes of Rostov, the descendants of Prince Pozharsky and so on. The Rurik clan is vast and diverse, even the Queen of England is included in it. We find a prolific and unspotted branch on the Zemsky Sobor. In a sacred sense, it will be an autocrat not only for Russia, but also for Ukraine, and for Belarus. And let there be a scepter in the form of a trident and a two-headed eagle.
    1. saygon66
      saygon66 18 October 2015 19: 21 New
      +1
      - Here is what, it seems to me, the thing ... The Emperor, if he is not some kind of "constitutionally limited" is not obliged to reconcile anyone ... The coat of arms is the Eagle, and the Trident and Pagonya are folk motifs ... a purely local flavor ...
  28. acetophenon
    acetophenon 18 October 2015 08: 48 New
    +5
    All cemeteries are occupied by irreplaceable and unique. And life somehow goes on.
    And about guarantees ... laughed.
    But in fact, even ass licking should be a measure of know. And then after all, you can lick the anus tightly.
  29. nvd5
    nvd5 18 October 2015 08: 49 New
    +4
    And Ivan is right. I agree with him even about the monarchy, not to mention other points. It can simply be called differently if the word "tsar" jars anyone.
    1. andj61
      andj61 18 October 2015 19: 25 New
      +2
      Quote: nvd5
      And Ivan is right. I agree with him even about the monarchy, not to mention other points. It can simply be called differently if the word "tsar" jars anyone.

      What about the emperor? wink
      1. nvd5
        nvd5 18 October 2015 20: 41 New
        +1
        Something like - Great Guardian.
        It's me like a joke.
  30. Reptiloid
    Reptiloid 18 October 2015 08: 50 New
    +1
    About minorities ---- there should be a surname publicity. If they are allowed --- people have the right to know! HERE even where I can declare to myself ---- the traditional orientation. Of course, it would be better if they wore the sign. I saw a quarrel in the subway and a scene of jealousy among them. It is no coincidence. It’s abomination.
    Article +++++, although you still have a lot to think about.
    If LGBT people wear signs --- they will limit themselves. But you don’t need to recognize them as patients, there’s no reason to waste doctors on them. And then they’ll still want to have disabilities and pensions
  31. provincial
    provincial 18 October 2015 08: 56 New
    0
    "There are no alternatives to our GDP so far." - He will go for the next term, until he prepares a shift. With two hands for paragraph 3. and 4.
  32. 3vs
    3vs 18 October 2015 09: 00 New
    +4
    Ivan, like the Orthodox, was even a priest.
    Somehow I missed the main thing, everything is in God's hands.
    Russia will need a new leader, he will be found and delivered.
    I personally do not see the point in the restoration of the monarchy.
    People are free to choose their own leader of the country, and rightly so!

    I would ask Ivan to attend to another idea:
    it is necessary to convene a referendum on inclusion in the constitution of Russia
    articles on the introduction of the clause "Against all" in elections at all levels.
    The wording is as follows:
    When recruiting for the election (president, Duma, local elections, governors ....)
    by clause "Against all" 50% plus one vote a second round of elections is held.
    In the second round of elections, parties with party lists and
    candidates from the first round.
    Elections are held by a majority system.
    In the second round, the candidate with the most votes wins.

    What will this give - those who do not go to the polls have a real reason to come and vote "Against all", when we gain a majority, we live in another country the next day - completely
    the current government is being updated!
    Is this not true democracy without Maidan and revolutions!
    Even if the item "Against all" does not gain the majority, it hangs over
    the current government.
    It was Zhirinovsky who sputtered saliva against this point!
    Such as he, Zyuganov, Mironov will only be carried forward from the Duma with their feet!
    They sit for thirty years and there is no end in sight ...
    That's what Ivan would think about.

    And what do you think?
    1. BMW
      BMW 18 October 2015 12: 18 New
      0
      Quote: 3vs
      And what do you think?

      Very reasonable, you have to ponder.
  33. 1536
    1536 18 October 2015 09: 18 New
    +3
    Still believing in a "good tsar" ... Have you ever tried to imagine that the country and society should go forward, develop, stick together, work for the benefit of themselves and those around them, despite who sits in the Kremlin and the Government House? Yes, even if you put cats there, there should not be revolutions and Maidans.
    When the system is worked out so that we will not be afraid of the leader's departure, then not a single brute will dare even think about looking angrily towards Russia. In the meantime, only one "intellectual" words are as far from the case as the Sun is from the center of the Galaxy.
  34. Magadan
    Magadan 18 October 2015 09: 21 New
    14
    Quote: Gardamir
    You can stupidly BUY the President. Remember the number two? ..


    Yes I remember. Russia then came in second in the world in terms of GDP, with growth rates twice as fast as the United States. Then back in Europe they wrote that if such development continues in Russia, then it will completely prevail over Europe.

    How did it end remember? The West gave us a coup. Maydauns came to power, to-rykh replaced by other Maydauns, Lenin-Trotskyites, who promised "down with capitalism", "factories for workers", "down with exploitation of man by man", etc.
    As a result, we got another exploitation of man by man called NEP, foreign concessions, to-rye began to plunder the subsoil .... in general, as in the current Dill, some "oligarchs" were exchanged for others. I'm wrong? Tell me where?
    Under Nicholas 2, the worker kept an unemployed wife and seven more children. Do you know why? Yes, because in terms of prices at that time (in food), the average salary (40-50 rubles) is the current 60-70 thousand !!!
    About the construction of railway roads, factories, submarines, the beginning of aircraft construction and electrification (! No need to lie that Lenin started it) I generally am silent.

    So you quite rightly mentioned Nikolai 2go. I think that even under Stalin, whom I deeply respect, there was no such rate of growth. And, by the way, thanks to Stalin that he sent all this maidan to Lenin-Trotsky’s pack to us at Kolyma. Because Stalin was precisely MONARCH!
    1. sa-ag
      sa-ag 18 October 2015 17: 12 New
      0
      Quote: Magadan
      don't lie that her Lenin started

      The GOELRO plan was launched in a destroyed civilian country, one might say that "from scratch"
  35. jovanni
    jovanni 18 October 2015 09: 36 New
    +1
    I enjoy watching the work of Ivan Okhlobystin. In movie. But often artists begin to confuse real life with that "intraframe" one ... From this, such, to put it mildly, revelations appear. Although I absolutely agree with this man's concern for the future of the Motherland after GDP. Is our President also affected by this disease - not to allow worthy successors to grow up next to him? Then everything that is now being done for the revival of Russia can easily go down the drain ...
  36. Bosk
    Bosk 18 October 2015 09: 45 New
    +1
    Monarchy is against because this is a 50-50 option, the most striking example is our last monarch. I agree to bury Ulyanoy-Lenin in a human way. The death penalty ... "An eye for an eye" - I agree, and indeed these punishments need to be dealt with, for example, there are misconduct when you can do just isolation, there are misdemeanors when a person should not only be isolated, but he also has to work or how to prove to society that he is not dangerous for him, but dangerous and hopeless I will repeat once again "An eye for an eye", otherwise now everyone is put in one "basin" and then they are surprised that the first time they sat down for a "bag of potatoes" well, off we go until the fifth cid for murder! To deprive Gomov of elective rights ... well, this is a bit overkill, because they are "sick" people and discrimination against sick people is not good, although on the other hand they are sick with their heads ... but still, it seems to me it's overkill. The inclusion of nationality and religion in the passport ... this is optional, whoever wants can fill out this column and who does not want to ...
  37. moskowit
    moskowit 18 October 2015 09: 49 New
    +6
    The first point is very controversial, and the rest should be taken IMMEDIATELY!
    And it is controversial only because during the restoration of the monarchy there is no legitimate candidate for the "post" of the monarch. The House of Romanov cannot claim the throne.

    "We examined the problem of succession to the throne in Russia from the historical, moral and legal point of view. The reader got acquainted with the systems of succession to the throne and with the main articles of the law on succession and the Establishment of the Imperial Family, with how these laws apply to the descendants of the Romanov Dynasty that once reigned in Russia. The reader received information about the origin of the Georgian clan Bagratids, whose descendants put forward their claims to the Russian Imperial Throne, about the family environment of the applicant from the Prussian House of Hohenzollerns. , in the pre-revolutionary years and during the February Revolution.

    What conclusions can be drawn? In our opinion, neither the historical, nor the moral, nor the legal point of view of the current applicants are suitable for the Russian Throne.

    - led. Prince Kirill Vladimirovich and his offspring by a legal act of Emperor Nicholas II of January 15 of 1907 of the year were deprived of their right to succession.

    - led the so-called "lawmaking" activity. book Kirill Vladimirovich and Prince. Vladimir Kirillovich in exile in relation to his family and the Dynasty as a whole is illegal, since it was carried out in violation of the laws of the former Russian Empire, on whose behalf it was proclaimed.

    - marriage of pr. Vladimir Kirillovich with Prince Leonid Georgievna Bagration is the Mukhran morganatic, as a result of which he cannot transfer to his daughter the rights belonging to members of the Imperial Family.

    - in the case of the accession of the son of Maria Georgievna, Prince George, the Prussian dynasty of the Hohenzollerns will reign in Russia.

    The author wants to conclude his article with the words led. book Nikolai Nikolaevich Jr. In particular, in May 1924, he wrote: "Being in a foreign land, I am not going to predict the form of government. However, the future power should be national, non-class and non-partisan. This power must be firm and strong."

    Rostislav KRASYUKOV,
    member of the Russian Genealogical Society in
    St. Petersburg and society "Gerold" in Berlin.

    http://www.monarhist.ru/mnenie/MnenieSobornDvij.htm

    Those who wish to follow this link can read the full article.
    They refused to invite representatives of princely families who left the Rurikovich and Gedeminovichi to the throne back in 1613.
    1. skifd
      skifd 18 October 2015 19: 40 New
      +1
      Quote: moskowit
      marriage of pr. Vladimir Kirillovich with Prince


      And "this" did not even have a moral right (and the deceased already) to anything, especially in Russia, after the support of Hitler's occupation of the USSR, and the hope to come to the "kingdom" on German bayonets (as a puppet) am .
  38. robbihood
    robbihood 18 October 2015 09: 53 New
    +4
    Reading Okhlobystin, one involuntarily recalls the reviews of his colleagues about him. They know him best. From an interview with M. Efremov. - "Are you in touch with Ivan Okhlobystin now?"
    For a long time we did not talk. We talked with him for the last time long before he went to Donetsk.
    In August of this year, he tweeted about Ukrainians: “I want all the power units to be blown up so that you all die.” True, then erased, but screenshots were taken.
    Okhlobystin is a private person. Let him say what he wants. Our profession is strange, our profession is suspicious. And the actors were always buried outside the cemetery fence. Actors after the emergence of cinema and Hollywood, and even more so after the appearance of television, became some kind of priests. And we are actually clowns. And that's why I am sometimes uncomfortable that I become some kind of herald. Then I read my interviews and think: some stupid person - analyzes, predicts, calls on someone to something, has a civic position ... "
    He has long been living in his fantasy world. But he uses it with benefit for himself and a large family that needs to be fed.
    1. andj61
      andj61 18 October 2015 19: 31 New
      +3
      Quote: robbihood
      When reading Okhlobystin, one involuntarily recalls the reviews of his colleagues about him. They then know him best. From an interview with M. Efremov.

      M. Efremov himself is far from an angel, especially on issues related to the attitude to the Russian world. His opinion is not authoritative in this matter, although in essence it is said correctly.
  39. papont1964
    papont1964 18 October 2015 10: 00 New
    +2
    Like it not, but with the receiver it’s bad. And nothing comes to mind.
    1. ALEA IACTA EST
      ALEA IACTA EST 18 October 2015 19: 40 New
      10
      Quote: papont1964
      Like it not, but with the receiver it’s bad

      Really...
  40. Reptiloid
    Reptiloid 18 October 2015 10: 05 New
    -1
    I have great respect for Ivan Okhlobystin. "Down House" and "Nightingale the Robber" are eternal themes for all times. Maybe there are some more --- classics about the eternal. Although not all my friends agree with me about these films. that the language can be different: fiction, grotesque, absurd. The works of the Strugatskys in the language of fiction are suitable for different times.
  41. populist
    populist 18 October 2015 10: 13 New
    +2
    On this, perhaps, I will finish my thoughts,

    It would be better not to start.
    Another custom throwing in the dead idea of ​​monarchism.
    Other items for populism and outrageous.
    There is nothing to discuss.
  42. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 18 October 2015 10: 17 New
    +1
    Of course, I. Okhlobystin goes a little too far, but his suggestions for items 4 and 5 are even very constructive. Even if someone does not like Okhlabystin, this does not give the right to fault him. He went his own way, which, incidentally, is unlikely to be possible for anyone who frankly vilifies him. And to cite the statements of M. Efremov in this situation is not only not appropriate, but also not correct, especially since Efremov did not say anything against Okhlobystin ..
    1. rotmistr60
      rotmistr60 18 October 2015 11: 53 New
      +1
      This is who so Ivan has become across the throat? Respond, maybe we'll talk.
  43. Yrsh.2008
    Yrsh.2008 18 October 2015 10: 19 New
    +1
    Okhlobystin is certainly a very controversial figure, but talented - that is, that is. But.... "Abolishing the moratorium on the death penalty for pedophiles and serial killers.

    4. Deprivation of electoral rights of representatives of sexual minorities, as mentally ill people. (Which is obvious)

    5. Inclusion in passports of the column "nationality" and "religion" as symbols of a conscious declaration of citizens' trustworthiness. (I am sure that representatives of other nationalities and religions living in Russia and sharing all the sorrows and joys with the Russian people for centuries will proudly accept these points.). "
    - proposals are worthy and long overdue.
    Regarding the receiver, let me assume that it is already determined (even if I don’t know about it myself) !!!
    But the remaining fabrications .... well, we have a free country!
  44. samarin1969
    samarin1969 18 October 2015 10: 24 New
    +3
    Okhlobystin's image is too shocking ... but people are not shy about supporting Crimea and Donbass. Many other figures of the Russian political show business remember about patriotism only during "anniversaries" and before the calculation of fees for patriotic militants ...

    In terms of details, Ivan is controversial - in fact, he is close to the truth ... democracy appeared in the 16-18 centuries as an instrument of "money bags" to directly influence the government. National traditions, faith, patriotism, the struggle against the enemies of the Fatherland, the national elite, etc. - all this was declared "undemocratic" ... There are bad kings, but temporary workers are even worse ...
  45. Reptiloid
    Reptiloid 18 October 2015 10: 24 New
    10
    And they overlooked the monarchy !! To the crap in all places!, Sitting small czar-officials and pushing their children everywhere, and "dynastic" marriages take place. Courtyards and courtyards.N.I are around everyone !! courtyard girls and footmen, and bed-room. All - small scale, but trying to enlarge!
  46. ig0r135
    ig0r135 18 October 2015 10: 31 New
    +3
    The method of choosing the president was already tested when the incumbent president, choosing a candidate, put him as prime minister and watched how he copes with the post, if bad, changed it to a new one until he found the right one. So did Yeltsin, and I think this method is much better than the rest. At least, everyone was convinced of this in practice. After all, V.V. Putin, already, is almost deified and they want to make him emperor, but this cannot be done, and he himself thinks against it. The monarchy, to anything in Russia, we Russians, on the contrary, need to socialize our country a little.
  47. Osterholz
    Osterholz 18 October 2015 10: 35 New
    +2
    With the restoration of the monarchy, Okhlobystin certainly went overboard. And Lenin may and must be buried, but it is not clear why these monarchists who would not calm down the remains of the tsar’s family for a year would also be buried for good, otherwise they would rush with them almost all over the world and offer everyone for this confess.
  48. v.yegorov
    v.yegorov 18 October 2015 10: 59 New
    +5
    The article is largely controversial, but has a rational core. Where else to find this
    Tsar, so that he cares about Russia and does not allow to steal the greedy courtiers! So far, unfortunately, this is from the world of fiction.
    1. BLOND
      BLOND 19 October 2015 04: 55 New
      +2
      When the sovereign obeys the law, then no one dares to oppose it.
      Peter 1
  49. Johnny51
    Johnny51 18 October 2015 11: 00 New
    +2
    But the author is right! And about the monarchy - too, very, very "in the subject"! .. Let's take this example: how can you bribe the monarch of Russia, if this appears? Is there enough money in the world for this ?! What in general can be offered to those who own Russia ?! And if we add to this the possibility of building a LONG-TERM strategy ?! AND?! In the Russian Empire, the nobility practically without hearsay was familiar with military service, from where, in fact, they always had such concepts as DUTY and HONOR at the forefront ... Is it worth continuing? Or is it worth considering? In general, in my understanding, only those rulers are worth something who say: "This is MY COUNTRY!" ... All the rest are TEMPORARY! Something like this...
    1. Magadan
      Magadan 18 October 2015 11: 29 New
      +6
      Quote: Johnny51
      But the author is right! And about the monarchy - too, very, very "in the subject"! .. Let's take this example: how can you bribe the monarch of Russia, if this appears? Is there enough money in the world for this ?!



      They have no answer to this! And the world's shadow sheepherds, such as the owners of the Fed, are just afraid of the Monarchy for this very reason! The President is a temporary worker! He is always tempted to think in the spirit of "at least the grass does not grow after me." From here we have the Yeltsin family.
      In the States, the President is simply a talking head. The clans appoint presidents there. Those who get out of control shoot like mad dogs. Four US Presidents have already been shot.
      Just imagine - you do not leave your apartment to your son, but to some kind of horseradish who will be elected by voting. Will you take much care of this apartment? I doubt it. That's the same with the country !!!
      1. Starley from the south
        Starley from the south 20 October 2015 22: 48 New
        0
        Quote: Magadan
        Just imagine - you do not leave your apartment to your son, but to some kind of horseradish who will be elected by voting. Will you take much care of this apartment? I doubt it. That's the same with the country !!!

        If the head of state is a true patriot of his country and thinks of a better future for his country, he will find like-minded people, the same patriots of his country, create long-term mechanisms for their search and promotion ... Then it will not be a pity to leave the country. But GDP only creates such mechanisms, and they will not work in full force soon if no one interferes.
    2. nikolaev
      nikolaev 18 October 2015 11: 50 New
      +7
      As history shows, a monarchy is the most effective management mechanism with a good monarch. And it turns into a nightmare for a country with a bad one.
      Unfortunately, there were as many bad monarchs as bad presidents.
      The inheritance of power does not guarantee the quality of power and the protection of the interests of the country. (Example: Alaska).
      Obviously, the search for a solution should lie on the path of democracy, the delegation of power to the president by the people to the maximum extent possible and the possibility of a quick and effective replacement of the president by referendum in the event of bankruptcy or betrayal.
      It’s impossible to really allow the Yeltsins or the Gorbachevs to come to power.
    3. Karabanov
      Karabanov 18 October 2015 12: 59 New
      +4
      Quote: Johnny51
      But the author is right! And about the monarchy - too, very, very "in the subject" !.

      It seems to me that all these arguments about the monarchy are nothing more than verbiage (it does not matter whether this form of government is good or bad). The monarchy in modern Russia is an anachronism and there is no return to it. This is already folklore, all these Rurikovich, Romanovs, past greatness ... Society and social institutions have left this, and no matter how many would not like resuscitation is not possible.
      In addition, Russia has its own modern "princes", "kings", "slaves" and "buffoons" ... Such is the modern "monarchy". They will not allow the revision of their powers.
      1. saygon66
        saygon66 18 October 2015 21: 32 New
        +3
        - Unfortunately, slavery, as a social phenomenon, exists regardless of the form of government and system request, as well as the desire to "steer" ... As for verbiage, the socialist ideas began with "City of the Sun" and "Utopia" ... fairy tales - no more ... And how it kicked in!
      2. Mishmish
        Mishmish 19 October 2015 16: 31 New
        0
        Why verbiage? Take an interest ... Vovina's friends ... those in power ... REALLY already entered the nobility! All, EPT, descendants of the nobles! As in the Communist Party consisted of HZ!
      3. Starley from the south
        Starley from the south 20 October 2015 22: 41 New
        0
        Quote: Karabanov
        The monarchy in modern Russia is an anachronism and there is no return to it.

        Absolutely right! You can’t enter the same river twice. Although the monarchy, in my opinion, the type of government is better than democracy, but the time of the monarchies has passed. We must look for another way.
    4. satris
      satris 19 October 2015 07: 54 New
      +5
      Yeah, nobles, estates ... But if a talented boy will appear - and he will again walk from Kholomogory with a fish train to the capital at the age of 16? Or will it not appear under current conditions? Yes, the Internet, perhaps, will help him get an education - but not a diploma, because the "arrogance of the nobility" will not accept the genius of the "commoner": the snout did not come out! And what should he do? Recreate the RSDLP? Or, again, they won't - with the current capabilities of general surveillance. Alas, alas. In this regard, the Soviet system was more flexible, more focused on finding and supporting talent. Unfortunately, the absence of a system for changing (cleaning up) power structures (the notorious nomenclature) made it possible to nurture generations of "crown princes" who care primarily about their own well-being and its preservation for centuries. And those people who would think first of all about the country, and after whom there was only one greatcoat and boots - yes, another 1000 rubles on the book - is not enough.
  50. Magadan
    Magadan 18 October 2015 11: 14 New
    +1
    As I expected, opponents of the Monarchy have nothing to say, except for general words like "nonsense", "nonsense", "I am against", etc.

    I ask opponents of the Monarchy to answer simple questions:

    1) Why did Russia acquire territory under the Monarchy, but did it only lose them after the overthrow of the Monarchy?
    2) Why under Nicholas the 2nd did the worker support his unemployed wife and 5-7 children? Why, if “everything was bad,” the worker received from 40 to 100 rubles / month, which at current prices (in terms of food) is from 60 to 150 thousand / month?
    3) Why in Russia ALL production was developed, and not just oil and gas ?!
    4) Why during numerous wars in Tsarist Russia there were no Vlasov generals and other traitors who went over to the side of the enemy and shot at their own? Or washed the enemy footcloths, as it was in World War II ?!

    And why do you, opponents of Nicholas, say that since there was a "revolution" in Russia, then it was an "objective necessity", but at the same time, those coups that the West staged in Libya, Syria, Ukraine, etc., are called coups , to-rye arranged the west?
    1. ig0r135
      ig0r135 18 October 2015 12: 21 New
      +1
      1) You that there is little territory of Russia, most joined on a voluntary basis, they themselves requested to go to Russia.
      2) This item is controversial and now there are workers who receive decent money, and many women prefer to have their money rather than report to a man.
      "Revolution" in Russia was not an objective necessity, you will not say the same about Ukraine last year. Everything was carefully prepared both then in Russia and now in Ukraine. And why are many so impressed by the monarchy, in fact, on the territory occupied by Russia, democracy prevailed and elected leaders, the monarchy, as an institution, was borrowed from the West.
    2. BMW
      BMW 18 October 2015 14: 53 New
      0
      Quote: Magadan
      As I expected, opponents of the Monarchy have nothing to say, except for general words like "nonsense", "nonsense", "I am against", etc.

      Your questions are rotten.
      1. It is not true that the USSR acquired before the 45 of the year at a speed comparable with the times of Ivan, Peter and Catherine.
      2. Both during the USSR and now and during the bloody, highly skilled workers always received very well.
      3. ???? Do not drive a fool.
      4. Is Port Arthur enough, or are more examples needed? And what did Nicholas do with Stessel and Stalin with traitors?
      Quote: Magadan
      And why do you, opponents of Nicholas, say that since there was a "revolution" in Russia, then it was an "objective necessity", but at the same time, those coups that the West staged in Libya, Syria, Ukraine, etc., are called coups , to-rye arranged the west?

      Learn the history of sir. Nikolashka is an empty place, spineless henpecked. Bloody is his name.
    3. VeteranS
      VeteranS 18 October 2015 16: 29 New
      +2
      There are still undeniable facts that the role and activities of the Holy Tsar-Martyr Nicholas II were deliberately distorted by the enemies of Russia - using obvious lies and deceit of the Russian people ... Facts- Under the reign of the last emperor, the Russian population of Russia increased by 70 (!) Million due to the natural growth, in terms of economic growth, Russia was ahead of all European countries and was the second in the world according to statistics of 1913, our ruble was the most reliable currency in the world, provided with gold content ... All this slander against the autocracy was actively spread by Anglo-Saxon politicians, inciting Germany to war with Russia ....
    4. sa-ag
      sa-ag 18 October 2015 17: 26 New
      0
      Quote: Magadan
      3) Why in Russia ALL production was developed, and not just oil and gas ?!

      Because oil and gas was only in its infancy
      Quote: Magadan
      ) Why under Nicholas the 2nd worker supported his unemployed wife and 5-7 children? Why, if “everything was bad,” the worker received from 40 to 100 rubles / month, which at current prices (in terms of food) is from 60 to 150 thousand / month?

      And what do you not mention about the length of the working day, its actual lack of rights, about life in barracks, and only a high-class worker at some Putilov factory, a large and a large city, could receive 100 rubles, and at the gold parity the salary of a worker in RI was 24,5 rubles
      1. a housewife
        a housewife 18 October 2015 21: 55 New
        +1
        With a salary of 25,5 rubles, the worker could buy a lot of things. A cow cost 5 rubles!
      2. The comment was deleted.