The media, citing the Iraqi Defense Ministry: Iraqi Air Force Su-30 attacked positions of ISIS militants

Informational portal Shafaaq reports that the Russian Su-30 multi-role fighters, delivered as part of the Iraqi Air Force contract, delivered the first strikes against the positions of the militants of the so-called Islamic State. The said portal refers to the statement of the representative of the press service of the Iraqi Air Force. A spokesman for the press service notes that the strikes were inflicted on three bases of the ISIL militants in the province of Salah al-Din (northern Iraq).


In addition, it is reported that with the help of Russian planes a strike was struck on a convoy of terrorists' vehicles moving towards the city of Mosul.

In the Western media, they were quick to announce that we could talk about the start of operations of the Russian Aerospace Forces on Iraqi territory, but the Iraqi military showed a photo of a fighter with Iraqi identification marks.

The media, citing the Iraqi Defense Ministry: Iraqi Air Force Su-30 attacked positions of ISIS militants


Earlier, the chief editor of the magazine “National Defense” Igor Korotchenko говорил that six Su-30 airplanes may have been delivered to Iraq, which were being upgraded at the facilities of the 558 aircraft repair plant in the Belarusian city of Baranovichi.
Photos used:
http://www.iraqinews.com
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

68 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. serg1970 16 October 2015 15: 26 New
    • 21
    • 0
    +21
    A second air front is good.
    1. Wiruz 16 October 2015 15: 32 New
      • -18
      • 0
      -18
      And here is the second air front? It says black and white "Su-30 Iraqi Air Force" fool
      1. serg1970 16 October 2015 15: 33 New
        • 23
        • 0
        +23
        And here is the second air front? It says "Su-30 Iraqi Air Force" in black and white fool

        Against ISIS. Americans with other custodians can not be considered, only they make a look.
        1. Firstvanguard 16 October 2015 16: 46 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          Quote: serg1970
          Americans with other custodians can not be considered, only they make a look.

          Not only, at least even weapons and supplies are dumped, but we can still do something dirty.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Mujahiddin777 16 October 2015 16: 07 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Vietnam Air Force fighters also flew in Vietnam and were pilots ... However, I will write only one last name Li-Si-Tsyn wink
      4. dmi.pris 16 October 2015 16: 28 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Read the article carefully — the enemy is something common ..
        Quote: Wiruz
        And here is the second air front? It says black and white "Su-30 Iraqi Air Force" fool
    2. Private IITR 16 October 2015 15: 32 New
      • 9
      • 0
      +9
      Campaign, Iraqis learned to fly the same
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. 222222 16 October 2015 15: 46 New
        • 31
        • 0
        +31
        No comment ...
    3. GSH-18 16 October 2015 15: 37 New
      • -34
      • 0
      -34
      Iraqi Air Force Su-30 attacked ISIS fighters

      How wonderful. As far as everyone knows, the Su-30 (SM) is a fighter. Accordingly, he is not specifically imprisoned on the ground ... except as a cannon. He has most of the air / air missiles.
      It is now used by our people in Syria to cover our bombers and attack aircraft Su-24 and Su-25, respectively.
      1. Wiruz 16 October 2015 15: 41 New
        • 37
        • 0
        +37
        How wonderful. As far as everyone knows, the Su-30 (SM) is a fighter. Accordingly, he is not specifically imprisoned on the ground ... except as a cannon. He has most of the air / air missiles.

        Comrade Marshal. Delete the comment before it's too late. Do not disgrace hi
        1. dmi.pris 16 October 2015 16: 37 New
          • 8
          • 0
          +8
          You can’t mess up these “epaulets” with your illiteracy ... In general, judging by the comments, most respected “generals and marshals” did not even serve in the army. I already wrote that I have a negative attitude to the idea of ​​site managers to “assign ranks” for comments and articles. Asterisks then get blood and not often a demonstration of their illiteracy. Dmitry, a sergeant of the reserve (and, no longer, age removed from the register)
          Quote: Wiruz
          How wonderful. As far as everyone knows, the Su-30 (SM) is a fighter. Accordingly, he is not specifically imprisoned on the ground ... except as a cannon. He has most of the air / air missiles.

          Comrade Marshal. Delete the comment before it's too late. Do not disgrace hi
          1. GRAY 16 October 2015 16: 51 New
            • 6
            • 0
            +6
            Quote: dmi.pris
            Stars then get with blood and often not a demonstration of their illiteracy.


            Do not be so intolerant; it is human nature to make mistakes.
      2. GRAY 16 October 2015 15: 42 New
        • 13
        • 0
        +13
        Quote: GSH-18
        How wonderful. As far as everyone knows, the Su-30 (SM) is a fighter. Accordingly, he is not specifically imprisoned on the ground ... except as a cannon. He has most of the air / air missiles.

        Not for nothing that he is multi-purpose, he is capable of bombs and guided weapons, too.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. Wedmak 16 October 2015 15: 56 New
            • 7
            • 0
            +7
            It can’t.

            Whose she can not? And OLS in front of the cabin for what? What about the radar?
      3. Good me 16 October 2015 15: 44 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        ANKARA

        ВTurkish Armed Forces shot down an aircraft with unidentified state ownership on the border with Syria, the report said on the website of the General Staff.

        According to the General Staff, the Turkish fighters who patrolled the border gave three warnings to an unidentified aircraft. However, he ignored these warnings, after which he was shot down? in accordance with the rules of warfare.


        Turkish Deputy Prime Minister Numan Kurtulmush in connection with the incident on the border with Syria said: “If you do not leave the territory of Turkey, the requirements of the rules of warfare will be met. According to the information we have, an aircraft with an unidentified state was shot down according to these rules. In the following minutes, in the following hours, as soon as the situation clears up, the Turkish Air Force will make a statement. ”


        ANKARA, 16 Oct - RIA Novosti, Alena Palazhchenko. Published the first pictures of a drone shot down by the Turkish Air Force on Friday.

        Earlier, the Turkish General Staff said that the Turkish Air Force F-16 fighters attacked and shot down an unidentified drone, three times violating the country's airspace from Syria. He fell in the province of Kilis at 2-3 kilometers from the Syrian border.

        In the pictures published by Anadolu agency, it is clear that the drone fell in a wooded area. The site of the fall is surrounded by military and gendarmes.

        A gray UAV no more than two meters long lies in dry grass under a tree. On board - number 2203, other inscriptions are not visible. The UAV has broken wings attached to the top of the fuselage. The case has no visible serious damage. The tail is missing.
        1. Wedmak 16 October 2015 15: 51 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          It looks like Orlan-10.
          1. sinukvl 16 October 2015 16: 05 New
            • 6
            • 0
            +6
            Absolutely not like, Orlan 10 has one keel, right there it looks like a double keel recess, the cooling system’s air intake is located on the bottom of the propeller, and here on top, but the Orlan’s fuselage is more licked. Photo of Orlan 10 below.
            1. Wedmak 16 October 2015 16: 09 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Yes ... I agree. Somehow badly considered. Something I can’t even find the appearance of this model. Whose production is he in general?
              1. i80186 16 October 2015 16: 39 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Quote: Wedmak
                Yes ... I agree. Somehow badly considered. Something I can’t even find the appearance of this model. Whose production is he in general?

                Yes, in any such a mug, they could print and teach to fly in a 3D printer in a week. Specialized microcircuits with the name of the manufacturer and the date if they find ours inside, then we can say that, they say, is Russian. laughing
                1. GRAY 16 October 2015 17: 14 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  Quote: i80186
                  Yes, in any such a mug, they could print and teach to fly in a 3D printer in a week.

                  Goofy ... there was a suspicion of an "air circle":
                  Andrey Vukolov, design engineer of one of the Kazan enterprises, where some models of Russian UAVs are made, made a cautious assumption:
                  - Judging by the "boat-nose" of the car, it may be a kind of a whole family of Israeli UAVs of the Heron type. Israelis love a tight configuration. By the way, the Turks at one time also bought similar drones from Israel.

                  Major Vladislav Ostreiko, head of the intelligence group of the Aerospace Forces of the Russian Federation, complained that the photo shows only a part of the winged machine and too few design features that could definitely tell who it belonged to. Although also more inclined to the fact that the flown UAV is "most likely" Israeli.

                  http://www.kp.ru/daily/26446/3317055/#close
                2. Yuyuka 16 October 2015 18: 15 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  there is an inscription on the inside of the "find returned proZba" and phone number 322223 wassat
              2. BLOND 16 October 2015 17: 30 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                a high probability that the PRC)))
                1. i80186 16 October 2015 17: 34 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: BLOND
                  a high probability that the PRC)))

                  Yes, everything is much more interesting. This can be done "on the knee" with the necessary knowledge in just a week or two.
                  http://ria.ru/defense_safety/20150903/1227219076.html smile
                  So, information like - "we shot down a drone similar to ..." is a stuffing by definition, especially if the wing span is less than a couple of meters.
              3. The comment was deleted.
        2. GRAY 16 October 2015 17: 52 New
          • 8
          • 0
          +8
          Quote: Good I
          According to the General Staff, the Turkish fighters who patrolled the border gave three warnings to an unidentified aircraft.

          He smiled - they made warnings to the drone, they probably also talk to the TV. lol
          1. i80186 16 October 2015 18: 08 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: GRAY
            He smiled - they made warnings to the drone, they probably also talk to the TV.

            Well, on the “correct” drones, a friend-or-foe identification system exists, at least, as it were. laughing
            1. GRAY 16 October 2015 18: 18 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: i80186
              Well, on the “correct” drones, a friend-or-foe identification system exists, at least, as it were.

              This one is painfully small, for sure there is no such defendant. And it is useless to call him by radio - the operator will still not hear.
              1. i80186 16 October 2015 18: 41 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Quote: GRAY
                This one is painfully small, for sure there is no such defendant. And it is useless to call him by radio - the operator will still not hear.

                And what for then he needs the Russian Aerospace Forces? smile
                1. GRAY 16 October 2015 19: 16 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  Quote: i80186
                  And what for then he needs the Russian Aerospace Forces?

                  What for the Russian Aerospace Forces, a broken Turkish drone? laughing
      4. The comment was deleted.
        1. Wiruz 16 October 2015 15: 53 New
          • 11
          • 0
          +11
          Yes please. Almost the first thing that got on the network at the request of the Su-30. Bottom right corner.
          1. GSH-18 16 October 2015 15: 56 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: Wiruz
            Yes please. Almost the first thing that got on the network at the request of the Su-30

            Convinced was wrong. Got excited! drinks
            But still, work on the earth is not his main purpose. Su-xnumx wow!
            1. figwam 16 October 2015 17: 16 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              But still, work on the earth is not his main purpose. Su-xnumx wow!

              The SU-34 was planned for a long time, to replace the SU-24M, and the SU-30 turned out of the SU-27UB (spark) can be said by chance (tried for India) and very successfully, so it would be foolish not to take such an aircraft into service.
            2. Falcon 16 October 2015 21: 44 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: GSH-18
              But still, work on the earth is not his main purpose. Su-xnumx wow!


              You are completely wrong hi

              Su-30 is the concept of an attack fighter. This concept has always been in the west. The Hindus liked her. There is a pilot and navigator or weapons operator.
              The only thing on it should be a hanging sighting container.



              This concept is similar to F / A-18, F-15 strike eagl, Mig-35.
              The second pilot traces and directs at the targets according to the data from the control panel.

              Su-34 in this regard differs only in the integrated sighting system, and an armored cabin (which is a moot point). At the same time, it loses in the fighter functions of the Su-30.

              Quote: GSH-18
              But, nevertheless, our Su-30СМ in Syria are used only as an air cover for a bombing air group, and for reconnaissance.


              Not from a good life, since they do not have sighting containers.

              For example, the F-15 strike eagle was the main bomber in the Persian Gulf - and it is a direct analogue of the Su-30

              In general, fighters should gain cover for gaining air supremacy. Such as Su-35
        2. Aleks28 16 October 2015 15: 55 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          Quote: GSH-18
          Can you comment on your minus sign?

          I can: Multifunctional ... Continue next?
        3. Good me 16 October 2015 15: 55 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: GSH-18
          The presence of suspensions under the wings does not mean that you can hang everything that comes to mind. That is why there are various types of aircraft: interceptors, bombers, attack aircraft, fighters.


          And besides the flight, and other other characteristics of the aircraft, it is worth remembering about the "linking" of weapons with systems for detecting targets and pointing at them.

          As practice shows, you can bomb and barrels from helicopters. But the accuracy ...
        4. Militarist 16 October 2015 16: 09 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Although I plusan both. But ... Here's a quote from the wiki.

          It was created on the basis of a combat training two-seater Su-27UB (T-10U) by means of its deep modernization. Created for management of group combat operations of fighters in solving problems of gaining air supremacy, ensuring combat operations of other branches of aviation, covering ground troops and objects, destroying airborne assaults, as well as for conducting air reconnaissance and destruction of ground or surface targets. Unlike the Su-27UB, the Su-30 is able to carry out military operations related to the long range and duration of flight and the effective management of a group of fighters.

          https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D1%83-30
      5. Wedmak 16 October 2015 15: 53 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Accordingly, he doesn’t specially grind on the ground ... except as a cannon

        Well, would you be ashamed of something. There, under the wing, you can hang in addition to air-to-air missiles.

        Free-fall bombs weighing 500 kg (up to 8 units) or 250 kg (28 units);
        Containers KMG-U (up to 7 units) or blocks NAR C-13 and C-8 (up to 4 units);
        Various combinations of guided and unguided weapons of various classes are possible.
      6. Mujahiddin777 16 October 2015 16: 12 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        This is a multi-purpose all-weather fighter. And SM is super maneuverable
        1. DmitryK 16 October 2015 16: 19 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          Quote: Mujahiddin777
          This is a multi-purpose all-weather fighter. And SM is super maneuverable

          SM is a serial upgraded
        2. GSH-18 16 October 2015 16: 23 New
          • -1
          • 0
          -1
          Quote: Mujahiddin777
          This is a multi-purpose all-weather fighter. And SM is super maneuverable

          That's right. Over-maneuverability to a bomber as a bomber to a fighter lol Well, okay, he’s MULTIPURPOSE. But, nevertheless, our Su-30SM in Syria are used only as an air cover for a bomber air group, and for reconnaissance.
      7. The comment was deleted.
      8. APASUS 16 October 2015 17: 44 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: GSH-18
        As far as everyone knows, the Su-30 (SM) is a fighter. Accordingly, he is not specifically imprisoned on the ground ... except as a cannon. He has most of the air / air missiles.

        It’s elementary to find a little info, and then argue
        1 Su-30SM (serial upgraded) - Su-30MKI for the Russian Air Force.

        2 Su-30MKI (modernized, commercial, Indian; Flanker-H) - version of Su-30MK for India, with the new N011M radar with passive phased array antenna (PFAR) and an expanded air-to-air and air-to-surface armament ".
        1. GSH-18 16 October 2015 18: 52 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: APASUS
          It’s elementary to find a little info, and then argue

          Come on already, I agreed that MAY work on the ground. Although categorically this is not denied anywhere.
      9. NEXUS 17 October 2015 09: 16 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: GSH-18
        As far as everyone knows, the Su-30 (SM) is a fighter. Accordingly, he is not specifically imprisoned on the ground ... except as a cannon.

        SU-30 is a MULTI-PURPOSE fighter capable of performing tasks both in gaining superiority in the air and working on the ground. It has in its arsenal both bombs and air-to-surface missiles and air-to-air missiles.
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. The comment was deleted.
    6. urii 16 October 2015 16: 25 New
      • 14
      • 0
      +14
      in russian spring
    7. marlin1203 16 October 2015 19: 38 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Now, any dive crow in the Middle East will appear to terrorists as a Russian fighter. laughing
  2. sever.56 16 October 2015 15: 27 New
    • 10
    • 0
    +10
    A strange fight with ISIS was fought for a year and a half in Syria and Iraq by the Americans and their allies ...
    Fifty-seven combat, as they say, sorties, and the result is a sparrow! As soon as Russia began an air operation in Syria, - right there, amid cries: - "Do not bomb those ... Barbarians ... Stop killing the defenseless," the Iraqis began to act REALLY. Maybe they are just tired of the fact that the Americans are fighting with ISIS with one hand, and feed them with the other hand? If so, then great. It seems to me that things would go faster if the West stopped fighting the ISIS. Let them not help, let them not interfere!
    1. Wiruz 16 October 2015 15: 34 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      No, okay, even if containers with ammunition and ammunition fell directly on the head of the Islamists laughing Without a parachute laughing
    2. sever.56 16 October 2015 15: 50 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Sorry, missed: fifty-seven THOUSAND sorties. hi
  3. Tummyr 16 October 2015 15: 28 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Good advertising products of the Russian defense industry.
  4. lelikas 16 October 2015 15: 28 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Did the Iraqis have to wait for us there? Or did they first look at the effectiveness of our strikes?
    1. Bobxnumx 16 October 2015 15: 45 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Apparently went through the process of training pilots.
    2. Aleks28 17 October 2015 16: 05 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: lelikas
      Did the Iraqis have to wait for us there? Or did they first look at the effectiveness of our strikes?

      Not a country that would get involved in a fight alone ..
  5. uhu189 16 October 2015 15: 33 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Where did Iraq get the pilots who can fly and bomb from SU-30? Moreover, they didn’t say that Iraq has SU-30 at all ... The activity of the Iraqi Air Force has sharply increased lately ...
    1. Wiruz 16 October 2015 15: 37 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Last year (or even the year before last) Iraq ordered a certain amount of Mi-28N, Mi-35 and Su-30 from us. Plus, somehow there Su-25 took "with hands". Like so.
      1. uhu189 16 October 2015 15: 52 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        For sure, the SU-30 wasn’t talking about attack aircraft and helicopters only. Judge for yourself, why did Iraq need heavy fighters at such a time, to fight ISIS aviation?
        1. Wiruz 16 October 2015 15: 58 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          For sure, the SU-30 wasn’t talking about attack aircraft and helicopters only. Judge for yourself, why did Iraq need heavy fighters at such a time, to fight ISIS aviation?

          In your opinion, the Su-30 can’t work on the ground? In addition, he has a huge plus, which neither helicopters nor the Su-25 have: he "works" at the height that MANPADS and anti-aircraft guns do not reach hi
          1. GSH-18 16 October 2015 16: 05 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: Wiruz
            In your opinion, the Su-30 can’t work on the ground? In addition, he has a huge plus, which neither helicopters nor the Su-25 have: he “works” at the height that MANPADS and hi anti-aircraft guns do not reach

            Allow to shake. Su-25 can rise to a height of over 10km. This was sucked in connection with the crash of the ill-fated Boeing over Banderstat. Some flyers said that you can go up to 17 km with an oxygen mask (the cabin is not airtight unfortunately), and so on with a bunch!
            1. Shmal_ 16 October 2015 16: 32 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              The working height of the Su-25 is up to 7 km! Dynamically, he can climb 10km, but not for long, because he can’t stay at this altitude! That is, make a "slide" and go down! He does not have a radar to capture air targets, which means that if he does not find it visually, he will not be able to go to the intersection course and capture the thermal head of the rocket! Hence the conclusion - to bring down a Boeing at an altitude of 10 km for the Su-25 is an impossible task! Almost not real! About 17km - it's generally funny! Attack aircraft at stratospheric altitude ...))
              1. Wedmak 16 October 2015 16: 33 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Hence the conclusion - to bring down a Boeing at an altitude of 10 km for the Su-25 is a difficult task! Almost not real!

                If you do not direct from the ground ....
              2. GSH-18 16 October 2015 17: 27 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Quote: Shmal_
                Hence the conclusion - to bring down a Boeing at an altitude of 10 km for the Su-25 is an impossible task! Almost not real! About 17km - it's generally funny!

                Oh oh The downed Boeing flew not by 10 km, but much lower than 6,5 km according to the skaklam and their "instruments." In addition, the Su-25 can carry regular air / air missiles, such as the R-60 or 60-M, judging by the picture on Wikipedia.
          2. uhu189 16 October 2015 16: 18 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            At high altitudes, the use of conventional free-falling bombs is ineffective, they need guided ammunition, which not only needs to be bought, they still need to learn how to use it. If we talk about the heights, then SU-24 is not suitable?
            The operation of the SU-30 is much more expensive than the SU-25. In addition, there are pilots in Iraq who can fly a SU-25, but there are no pilots who can fly a SU-30. Given the loss of a third of the territory, why should Iraq spend a lot of money on a fighter plane, which has the ability to work on the ground is only one of the functions, moreover, not the main ones, at the same time when you can buy a couple of extra attack planes that are specially designed to work on ground goals and with which you can even fight tomorrow?
            1. GSH-18 16 October 2015 17: 34 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: uhu189
              in which the ability to work on the ground is only one of the functions, though not the main ones,

              I completely agree. This is what I had in mind. Well, or the Su-24 upgraded versions are pure bombers capable of taking on board even more ammunition (bombs) in mass than the Su-25!
          3. Shmal_ 16 October 2015 16: 43 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Work on the ground with uncontrolled free-falling ammunition does not depend on the type of aircraft, but on the parameters of the use of the ammunition itself. For example, the FAB-250 bomb, no matter what to throw from, with the Su-25 or with the Su-30. Working discharge height with an acceptable accuracy of 2-3 km. And this is the reach of MANPADS. Therefore, ours work as a link and shoot so many LTCs that the sky looks like a salute on Victory Day!
  6. Alexander 3 16 October 2015 15: 36 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    This is good. Iraq is interested in eradicating the igil and coordinate with Syria.
  7. gukoyan 16 October 2015 15: 50 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    SU-27, NARs also knew how to throw off, and SU-30, in any way, also knows how to throw them out, because it is a multifunctional machine.
    1. Wiruz 16 October 2015 16: 00 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      As far as I know, the first production version of the Su-27 could only work from the gun on the ground. This is starting with the Su-27SM began to gradually introduce the ability to work on the ground. Although, as for NURs, I could be wrong, to work with them a lot of mind is not necessary what
  8. cherkas.oe 16 October 2015 15: 52 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: GSH-18
    How wonderful. As far as everyone knows, the Su-30 (SM) is a fighter.

    Multipurpose, able to use air in addition to rockets, also x-31, x-29, x-59, as well as cab-500 and even just bunk and cast iron.
  9. jaroff 16 October 2015 15: 54 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    In the photo, the Su-30 with PGO, but without the formation of flying lights. So not Malaysian (Su-30MKM). It remains either Su-30MKI or Su-30SM. These planes were not officially delivered to Iraq, there was no contract and no. In Belarus, they upgraded the Su-30K or Su-30KN, but this machine without PGO.
    1. Wedmak 16 October 2015 16: 04 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      but this car without PGO.

      But Vicki reveals the origin of this side:
      Iraq - 10 Su-30K, as of June 2014 of the year [62]. Iraqi military received Su-30K, previously in service in India
      In India, the MKI, but just before that, the 10 Su-30K were delivered, which they then took away, replacing them with the MKI, because could not upgrade K to MKI. And as a result, they ended up in Iraq.
    2. Fbw
      Fbw 16 October 2015 16: 39 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      THIS IS SU-30MKI, because on the keel the flight number is INDIA SB Air Force (numbers are hard to make out), and the IRAKA Air Force identification marks are photoshop.
      1. jaroff 16 October 2015 18: 37 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Therefore, we can safely conclude that photography has nothing to do with the news article. Su yes not that Su. The photo is separate, and the article is separate.
  10. samara-58 16 October 2015 15: 57 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Waiting for the Iranian Air Force ... etc. fellow
  11. AdekvatNICK 16 October 2015 15: 57 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    inventors damn))

    1. Aleks28 16 October 2015 16: 07 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: AdekvatNICK
      inventors damn))

      For that, not what kind of electronic warfare to them how much ... laughing wassat
      1. AdekvatNICK 16 October 2015 16: 09 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        and technical supervision is not undermining
    2. demel2 16 October 2015 16: 40 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      It is ridiculous of course, but at the same time almost two countries were captured.
      1. Firstvanguard 16 October 2015 16: 56 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: demel2
        Funny of course

        It would be funny if they didn’t bullet this crap in the housing estates, and all this is so sad.
  12. ASG7 16 October 2015 16: 02 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Judging by the reaction of the Americans, it was unexpected for them, given their presence in Iraq.
    Conclusion No. 1: paid for the purchase of Iran, deployed in Iran, Iraqi pilots trained in Russia. The probability is 0,3.
    Conclusion number 2: in order not to anger the Americans from the side of the Iraqis, an operation of the Russian Aerospace Forces is possible under deep cover. The probability is 0,7.
    1. evge-malyshev 16 October 2015 22: 09 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: ASG7
      Conclusion number 2: in order not to anger the Americans from the side of the Iraqis, an operation of the Russian Aerospace Forces is possible under deep cover. The probability is 0,7.


      Nuuu ... Strategist ... It's time to get promoted.
  13. SMS
    SMS 16 October 2015 16: 06 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The most interesting thing is that we deliver these planes to Iraq, and then we forgive debts of 8 billion dollars.
    1. AdekvatNICK 16 October 2015 16: 08 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      remember. Under the phrase "forgiven duty" always hides what we do not know. Debts are written off in exchange for something. These are the laws of geopolitics
  14. Yak28 16 October 2015 16: 21 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    Is it not dangerous to sell equipment like SU-30 or TOS-1A Solntsepek and so on to countries like Iraq? These countries cooperate with the United States, and the equipment can be provided to the Americans for research. Will this not harm Russia's defense? Surely our sworn friends examined along and across the equipment left in the Warsaw Pact countries, SU-24, SU-25, MIG-29 and so on
    1. Wedmak 16 October 2015 16: 26 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      The equipment is usually sold heavily modified, or even with foreign equipment. Yes and performance characteristics are often underestimated. In airplanes, in general, only a glider and the same.
      Well, the Chinese investigated the Su-33 sold to them by Ukrainians. The glider was of course crashed, they have their own avionics, but there are no engines yet ... their resource is extremely low.
    2. tolian 16 October 2015 16: 54 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Remember Katyusha. But the Germans had it. You apparently also consider Russia a commodity country.
  15. Thirsty for wind 16 October 2015 16: 22 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It seems that the participants in the "event" sensing a trend coinciding with their preferences compete in acts of retribution for the obscene freaks done up by the freaks. Worthy zeal. One thing to note in caution is revenge is a cold dish.
  16. Militarist 16 October 2015 16: 24 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Mujahiddin777
    And SM is super maneuverable

    Do you mean SU-30SM? If so then you are mistaken.
    SU-30SM (serial upgraded).

    All the same wiki.
    https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D1%83-30
  17. The comment was deleted.
    1. Wedmak 16 October 2015 16: 53 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      I’m curious how you distinguish between Su-30K and Su-30MKI.
  18. anfil 16 October 2015 16: 46 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Our drying is too tough for someone
  19. gladysheff2010 16 October 2015 16: 48 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Shafaaq Information Portal reports that Russian Su-30 multipurpose fighters, delivered under the Iraqi Air Force contract, delivered the first attacks on the positions of the militants of the so-called “Islamic State”.

    That's about how ravings and rumors about "Russian" participation in this or that conflict are spreading, and ours later justify themselves: de, they say there wasn’t such a thing!
  20. gg.na 16 October 2015 16: 50 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It is necessary to hammer and crush these Igilov terrorists by all possible means !!! I repeat, ALL POSSIBLE !!!
  21. demandy1 16 October 2015 17: 30 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The next step is the creation of a military base in Iraq, then in Iran and further throughout the Middle East, so that Americans would not poke their nose there
  22. roskot 16 October 2015 17: 34 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The good news is that in Iraq dushmans are not given rest. But Iraqis, Iranians or ours is another matter.