Military Review

Russia will continue to supply weapons to Syria

31
Russia will continue to supply weapons to Syria

Defense industry will fulfill all commitments under current contracts

Russia continues to supply weapons to Syria in accordance with the contracts concluded earlier, since there are no restrictions on this issue.

“Since there are no restrictions on the supply of weapons to Syria, Russia will fulfill its obligations to this country under all existing contracts,” the RIA News»Vyacheslav Dzirkaln Deputy Director of the FSMTC (Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation) at a press conference held in Dubai.

All obligations for the supply of weapons to Syria, Russia fulfills, and will fulfill, until any restrictions related to the situation in Syria.

Mr. Dzirkaln noted: “We hope that the situation in Syria will stabilize in the near future. And a number of initiatives that Russia has launched will contribute to the normalization of the situation in the country. ”

According to the FSMTC deputy director, Russia on Syria clearly states its position when voting in the UN Security Council on the draft resolutions proposed by Western countries, which, according to Dzirkaln, “was distinguished by one-sided accusation against Damascus”, which also had the ultimatous threat of imposing sanctions on Syrian authorities.

According to the UN, many months of armed suppression of the uprising in Syria killed at least 3,5 thousands of people. Syrian opposition and Western countries are demanding the resignation of Bashar al-Assad, the president of Syria. Recall that in early October, China and Russia blocked the adoption of a resolution in the UN Security Council.
31 comment
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. KGB161rus
    KGB161rus 15 November 2011 23: 46
    +5
    Syria takes 16th place in the ranking of strong armies, and now Assad will purchase more and more weapons, this is in our hands, and there will also be other warnings against encroachments.
    1. ksv_rnd
      ksv_rnd 16 November 2011 00: 32
      -25
      Election PR of Vile Putin and his party.

      FUNNY! YOU SHOULD TOPCH AND ADD THE MIC! WHAT YOU DELIVER IS GOING TO, YOU HAVE EVERYTHING THROUGH THE REAR!
      1. Lech e-mine
        Lech e-mine 16 November 2011 03: 11
        +12
        and you are apparently a supporter of the vile Pindos democracy. you have everything through bombing and rocket attacks on peaceful cities.
      2. Andrey Skulkin
        Andrey Skulkin 16 November 2011 07: 40
        +1
        Thickly trollish
        Go get a medal from Canalise Rice
      3. Don
        Don 16 November 2011 12: 48
        +1
        Maybe the admin will finally remove this troll?
      4. plotnikov561956
        plotnikov561956 12 February 2012 11: 02
        0
        Well, a piece of the same gynecologist fell on the site
      5. Sandov
        Sandov 24 February 2012 23: 28
        0
        Thank God our authorities heard the cries and suffering of the people of Syria. Eh earlier would be - maybe they would save Serbia too.
  2. AlievMR
    AlievMR 16 November 2011 00: 00
    +9
    Expression - "WANT PEACE, PREPARE FOR WAR". As relevant as ever
    1. fantast
      fantast 16 November 2011 00: 12
      +5
      for Russia, it is also very important at the moment!
      1. KASKAD
        KASKAD 16 November 2011 00: 47
        +4
        "War cannot be prevented, prepare for it." - Albert Einstein
  3. arkhip2020
    arkhip2020 16 November 2011 00: 05
    +4
    I hope the amers will not step on the Syrian rake. if you still decide, then burn yourself in our new weapon
    1. Dart weyder
      Dart weyder 16 November 2011 05: 38
      +4
      fresh giving - yes to believe with difficulty, already as experience - Yugoslavia, Iraq - also seemed to have a very powerful army! The West needs war, this is money for them, then Russia would have been torn for a long time, if only (they would have tried it) if it weren’t for the legacy of an alliance in the form of ICBMs with nuclear charges - but Syria is an end for them that justifies any means! And if they take up it, I think they will get their way, the Syrians themselves will not get out, and the 5th column is quite established there recourse
      1. Sandov
        Sandov 24 February 2012 23: 30
        0
        The generals were bought with giblets, and after they were destroyed. Conclusion - do not bargain with the killers.
  4. Cardamom
    Cardamom 16 November 2011 00: 05
    +2
    Something tells me that if NATO comes in droves, no, even Russian, weapons (except, possibly, nuclear) Syria will not help, because you need to be able to fight on it! Somehow they need to negotiate with the opposition, otherwise the Arabs themselves will turn their nose away from them.
    1. Cardamom
      Cardamom 16 November 2011 00: 24
      +4
      The only point in deliveries to Syria is to see how our weapons behave in a real battle with a potential enemy.
      1. urzul
        urzul 16 November 2011 14: 00
        +2
        Everything is basically true, of course Syria has no chance against the entire NATO bloc. They will not attack Russia because the missile defense system does not give 100% guarantee. Who in Europe wants to retaliate with at least one ICBM, even with 3-4 warheads.
    2. танк
      танк 6 December 2011 17: 25
      -2
      Their opposition is the United States and they have nothing to negotiate
  5. Cap-3 USSR
    Cap-3 USSR 16 November 2011 01: 16
    +6
    It is not only a new weapon, but also who owns it. To this day, special forces are trained to work with knives. This also does not mean that it is out of date. From tezhe s-300 and s-400 will be of little use if you put a teapot there.
    1. mar.tira
      mar.tira 16 November 2011 05: 52
      +4
      So it’s necessary to send military specialists there (to protect our military bases)
    2. plotnikov561956
      plotnikov561956 12 February 2012 11: 09
      0
      Definitely, if something similar was posed, this issue was resolved (Beech, Shell, etc.)
  6. esaul
    esaul 16 November 2011 06: 01
    +8
    The stronger the Syrian army is on the day of the start of the NATO aggression, the worse for NATO and the better for humanity. Having received a sensitive answer, the NATO countries will have to think about whether to go on with such a shameless "drill."
    1. Sergh
      Sergh 16 November 2011 07: 44
      +5
      Syria really needs satellite intelligence, and all the information in the region. Who, how much, where, where, took off, and agent infa, to prevent and time to focus on the dangerous directions of their troops. But the Syrians will not be able to work with new equipment, yes, pros and God forbid that they were there on time.
      The Syrians need to eliminate the enemy agents and continue to smash the miserable barefoot. Without the help of others, they will be all bad, for us, the same combat test of equipment, communications equipment, and just a new tactics of warfare, it is worth a lot. If only our good general there, not ala-Taburetkina.
      1. Boos24
        Boos24 19 November 2011 11: 30
        0
        I am sure that the tyda not only went iron, specialists should already admire the local landscapes
  7. esaul
    esaul 16 November 2011 08: 14
    +1
    I think, Serge, that in the event of a conflict, Iran will not be left without satellite intelligence, thanks to the satellite grouping of Russia, like Georgia was supported by the uss, at one time.
  8. 916-th
    916-th 16 November 2011 09: 51
    +1
    Block anti-Syrian decisions, continue deliveries, and borrow the best Western experience for dessert - introduce private military companies (PMCs) and send our specialists there under this roof. And then we will touch NATO for the udder!
    1. esaul
      esaul 16 November 2011 16: 46
      +1
      About PMCs - I really liked the idea! I support!
      1. Lech e-mine
        Lech e-mine 16 November 2011 16: 49
        +1
        Yeah, if that state is not responsible for it, he himself came. And you can arm him as you like.
    2. PSih2097
      PSih2097 19 November 2011 12: 00
      0
      PMCs have long existed, an example is the Security Council of Gazprom, LukOil-a, RosAtom ... Almost any federal corporation has its own small army.
      Or another example - the Ministry of Emergency Situations, for which they need special forces units - I don’t understand ...
  9. sprut
    sprut 19 November 2011 11: 07
    0
    S-400 there. Then no one will be snooping.
  10. Famet
    Famet 19 February 2012 17: 55
    0
    I believe that it is necessary to increase the supply of arms to Syria, and then to Iran.
    Otherwise they will crush us.
    Moreover, I believe that the successful use of our weapons will increase sales and compensate for losses in Libya ....... ammunition is better sold than they will explode in warehouses
  11. polyansky.constantin
    polyansky.constantin 25 February 2012 03: 15
    0
    YES RUSSIA THE MOST STRONG