Chinese bomber launches high-precision long-range cruise missiles

The Chinese strategic bomber H-6K succeeded for the first time in launching high-precision cruise missiles at long range on land and sea targets.




Chinese military expert in the field aviation Fu Kanshao noted that in the past, Chinese bombers had the opportunity to drop only free-falling bombs, they were unable to conduct high-precision attacks. However, according to Fu Kanshao, after the introduction of “own advanced technologies”, the N-6K will be able to carry and launch cruise missiles at land and sea targets, so China will be able to hit several targets on the ground in one operation.

Fu Kanshao stressed that such an ability is necessary for any air force if they are prepared to perform strategic tasks. According to him, H-6K is undoubtedly a valuable asset of the PLA Air Force. Fu Kanshao noted that these planes managed to fly several thousand kilometers in neutral airspace during recent tests and hit a group of targets with highly accurate weapons.

It is noted that the bomber had to use complex maneuvers and tactics in order to overcome the defense of the "enemy" in difficult weather conditions and "electromagnetic resistance." It should be noted that previously only the USA and the Russian Federation had similar opportunities.
Photos used:
http://eurasian-defence.ru/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

76 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Engineer 15 October 2015 11: 27 New
    • 21
    • 0
    +21
    Why not carry out these launches on the position of the IG in Syria?
    1. air wolf 15 October 2015 11: 29 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      I support))
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. oleg-gr 15 October 2015 11: 30 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Missile range not indicated. If the range is similar to our Caliber, the Americans will not turn up. There will be a lot of scream in the media.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. bulvas 15 October 2015 11: 39 New
          • 8
          • 0
          +8
          Quote: oleg-gr
          Why not carry out these launches on the position of the IG in Syria?



          Better to wait.

          It is not yet known what it is, Chinese "precision"

          Let the experience be gained on targets
          1. Engineer 15 October 2015 11: 43 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Well, if there are any doubts about the precision of the missiles, then the Chinese tanks showed themselves very precisely very accurately. Again, the new Sino-Kama helicopters can be tested. In fact, the Chinese have many options.
            1. SIvan 15 October 2015 11: 55 New
              • 6
              • 0
              +6
              If you look by analogy with tanks at the biathlon, Chinese missiles must be very accurate, but move poorly, break three times in a row in flight laughing
              1. demo 15 October 2015 12: 22 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                It'S Nothing!
                Moscow, i.e. Beijing, not immediately built!
                And rebuilt many times.
                1. Talgat 15 October 2015 21: 22 New
                  • 2
                  • 0
                  +2
                  Quote: Engineer
                  Why not carry out these launches on the position of the IG in Syria?


                  Everyone thinks their own "area of ​​responsibility"

                  In China, this is primarily the containment of Japan and the US in the Far East

                  Imagine how difficult it would be for Russia now in the Far East without China! And so there are enough fronts, but without the Chinese, Yapi and the United States would have a strong advantage now, and there would be enormous pressure on the Kuril Islands
          2. reguai 15 October 2015 12: 37 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            there is such a belief - all bombs fall at the epicenter! good
        3. Rus2012 15 October 2015 13: 41 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: oleg-gr
          Missile range not specified

          ... firstly, the photo is not H-6K
          Secondly, the Xian H-6K is the latest version of the classic H-6 (Tu-16) with new D-30KP-2 turbofan engines with a thrust of about 118 kN each, new avionics, enlarged air intakes, a modernized cockpit and an enlarged aerial cowl 23-mm guns.
          The combat load is 12 000 kg.
          Bomber capable of carrying Xnumx cruise missiles CJ-10A (copy X-55, range 2,5tkm). Combat radius H-6K- 3000 km (range-6km, without refueling).
          He made the first flight on January 5 2007 of the year. Adopted by the Chinese Air Force in the 2011 year.
          Excellent subsonic aircraft with excellent data ...

          For information, at the end of 60xx, we ourselves planned in this way to modernize the Tu-16, however, we stopped at the Tu-22M.

          Here is a photo of Xian H-6K
          1. Iline 15 October 2015 17: 48 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: Rus2012
            The bomber is capable of carrying 6 CJ-10A cruise missiles (copy of the X-55, range 2,5tkm).

            Yes, most likely they were shot by X-55 missiles of their own production.
            When in 1999 - 2000 we took away the Tu-95MS and Tu-160 from Ukraine, then under the contract they were obliged to return all the X-55s to them. Now I don’t remember exactly how many echelons with them we sent to Russia. But there was a decent amount of them. But then, nevertheless, information leaked that they still managed to boil some Chinese missiles.
            The guys quickly mastered the new technique, however ...
      3. Alexey Boukin 15 October 2015 12: 45 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Another good click on the "shoe polished nose" is the American "all-seeing eye." Bravo!!!
    2. Sauron80 15 October 2015 11: 30 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      In this case, the United States will begin to intensively help the “oppressed” Uighurs. The Chinese apparently do not want to go on rampage yet.
      1. Azitral 15 October 2015 12: 19 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Organic esters of fluorophosphoric acid help very well against oppression. If everything is done correctly, no one will even notice anything.
      2. demo 15 October 2015 12: 24 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        The oppressed Uigurs already help, all and sundry.
        The Chinese, however, announced that they would begin to help the oppressed peoples of the Hawaiian Islands.
        Oh how.
        Freedom to Hawaiians!
    3. MIKHAN 15 October 2015 11: 30 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: Engineer
      Why not carry out these launches on the position of the IG in Syria?

      This is being prepared for Japan and the United States .. And in Syria, it would be just rocket ships drove on duty, well, they banged together with Russia .. And that’s it! hi
      1. asiat_61 15 October 2015 13: 08 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        I don’t see much joy, we are closest.
      2. Karlovar 15 October 2015 13: 21 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        The division of “labor” between the PRC and the Russian Federation is likely to take place ... It is not for nothing that Putin doesn’t soar about the surface component of the Pacific Fleet, focusing on the Black Sea Fleet, the Northern Fleet, the Caspian Flotilla ...
    4. vovanpain 15 October 2015 11: 32 New
      • 11
      • 0
      +11
      Quote: Engineer
      Why not carry out these launches on the position of the IG in Syria?

      China will provide us moral support and abstain from the UN Security Council.
      1. Basarev 15 October 2015 11: 42 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Somehow, this Chinese bomber looks like our Tu-16.
        1. pvv113 15 October 2015 11: 46 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          The Chinese have a license to produce the Tu-16, which they have called the N-6.
          By the way, the Tu-16 is an excellent reliable machine (I mean the Soviet-made Tu-16)
        2. Bayonet 15 October 2015 12: 06 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Basarev
          Somehow, this Chinese bomber looks like our Tu-16.

          And why would he not look like if this is the further development of the licensed Tu-16 smile
    5. Bayonet 15 October 2015 12: 02 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Engineer

      Why not carry out these launches on the position of the IG in Syria?

      Because the launches were made for the first time (read the article). Work on the enemy with previously unverified weapons may have unpredictable consequences. Simply put - you never know where it flies ... hi
      1. Karlovar 15 October 2015 13: 27 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Emotions are not the best adviser and ally ... Moreover, emotions in serious matters are evil ...
    6. YARUSSIAN39 15 October 2015 12: 32 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      This is the Chinese, they have a policy of neutrality, just do not tell the distance ...
    7. wild 15 October 2015 13: 07 New
      • -2
      • 0
      -2
      Quote: Engineer
      Why not carry out these launches on the position of the IG in Syria?

      Because all Chinese power is a soap bubble. Bluffing after bluffing.
      1. Karlovar 15 October 2015 13: 30 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        China's economic power is a bluff ???? Have you been to China at least once ??? 80s does not count ..
  2. Altona 15 October 2015 11: 30 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Tu-16, the beginning of the 70s of the last century, USSR, Crimea ...
    1. MIKHAN 15 October 2015 11: 33 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Altona
      Tu-16, the beginning of the 70s of the last century, USSR, Crimea ...

      They copy everything, it’s their disease already ... There seems to be money! Well, okay, we’re calmer ... hi
      1. Altona 15 October 2015 11: 34 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: MIKHAN
        They copy everything, it’s their disease already .. There seems to be money! Well, okay, we’re calmer ..

        --------------------
        I mean that they repeated what we have long been on combat duty ...
        1. Bayonet 15 October 2015 12: 08 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Quote: Altona
          -------------------
          I mean that they repeated what we have long been on combat duty ...

          Tu-16 has not been on combat duty for a long time.
          1. Altona 15 October 2015 14: 04 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: Bayonet
            Tu-16 has not been on combat duty for a long time.

            -------------------------
            We don’t, but China has it, but I wrote "70s of the last century" ... And even launches were made ... We have long had Tu-22M3 ...
      2. Manul 15 October 2015 12: 23 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Copy everything, it’s their disease already.

        Pleased quotes from the author
        after the introduction of “own advanced technologies”
        lol . Notably troll. Who is interested in stealing technology?
        We must pay tribute to China - they are developing rapidly. Only this statement seems to be the answer to the launches of our Caspian flotilla. Now everyone will throw rockets to measure.
        1. Karlovar 15 October 2015 13: 35 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          In the Middle Ages, Arabs copied numbers from Hindus, from Greeks, ancient Greek works .... and at the output they issued science to mathematics (the mother of all sciences), which the world has been successfully using to this day ... Europe only bothered to copy Arabic mathematics during the Renaissance. .... It's me about the usefulness and effectiveness of copying .... from history ....
  3. 3 Gorynych 15 October 2015 11: 30 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    In the near future, probably on the IG will be trained ....
  4. dsi
    dsi 15 October 2015 11: 33 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    bombers had to use sophisticated maneuvers and tactics to overcome the "enemy" defenses in difficult weather conditions and "electromagnetic counteraction"

    The Chinese will fill up a couple more islands and I think the Americans will give up ...
    1. Karlovar 15 October 2015 13: 42 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      An island is 10 times cheaper than an aircraft carrier, it is built 10 times faster, it can accommodate a larger wing, does not require a warrant (everything is about-air defense, it will be on the island itself), ten times more durable (unsinkable) .... For the Asia-Pacific theater of war brilliant solution ...
  5. Andrey Yuryevich 15 October 2015 11: 33 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    China hinted to the Americans, but the fact that they have intensified in Asia.
  6. Andrea 15 October 2015 11: 33 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Something hurts on TU16 looks like. what
    A weak TU160 copy?
    1. Vadim12 15 October 2015 11: 41 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      They completely changed the filling and the engines seem to have set their own. But it seems that in the film "Case in the square .." was shot ...
      1. Rus2012 15 October 2015 13: 52 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: Vadim12
        engines seem to have put their own

        Y-20 - this is licensed D-30KP-2
    2. Amurets 15 October 2015 11: 48 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      This is the Chinese-made Tu-16. In the 50s, we sold the license to China. We removed the Tu-16 from service in 1991. In China, the first flight of a Chinese-made aircraft took place in 1959.
    3. Buffalo 15 October 2015 11: 53 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      That's right. Aircraft - "seamless".
      China is a country of plagiarists.
  7. Semen Semyonitch 15 October 2015 11: 36 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    after the introduction of “own advanced technologies”
    As in everything else, it is exclusively "own" ... Well, they are not to blame for the fact that the planes are similar to our Dryers, and the car is BMW laughing
    1. Amurets 15 October 2015 11: 58 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Semyon Semyonich. I don’t know what proportion of shares China has in BMW, but in Volvo and Jaguar, the Chinese have controlling stakes. So, by right, the Chinese can consider technology their own. Moreover, the Chinese officially bought a Tu-16 production license in the USSR. The Chinese worked independently on the N-6K modification. I won’t tell you about the missiles. By the way, unlike us, the Chinese produce all military electronics themselves.
      1. Bekas1967 15 October 2015 16: 14 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        And we were not allowed to buy Opel. They do not want to share technology.
        1. Semen Semyonitch 15 October 2015 21: 52 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Bekas1967
          And we were not allowed to buy Opel. They do not want to share technology.

          It is necessary to take an example from the Chinese ...
      2. Semen Semyonitch 15 October 2015 21: 50 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Amurets
        in Volvo and Jaguar, the Chinese have controlling stakes, so the Chinese can rightfully consider technology their own.

        Well, yes, of course ... Purchased, spionyrene. At one time, the Japanese got sick of them butting under licenses. But, well, well done ... Where I can’t buy, there I’m committing ...
  8. rotmistr60 15 October 2015 11: 37 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Another surprise for the United States, now from China. This is probably the answer for the American ships off the disputed islands.
    1. andranick 15 October 2015 12: 02 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      This is in response to a recent statement by the US military at a meeting in Australia that their ships and planes will "sail" and fly wherever they want, including from the poured islands. China has shown that they will have to do this with caution and a supply of diapers.
  9. Vladimir 15 October 2015 11: 37 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Engineer
    Why not carry out these launches on the position of the IG in Syria?

    Judging from the article, these were test launches and to guarantee the accuracy of their implementation would be reckless for China and, moreover, the distance is not small as for testing.
  10. Vladimir 1964 15 October 2015 11: 38 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    It is noted that the bomber had to use complex maneuvers and tactics in order to overcome the defense of the "enemy" in difficult weather conditions and "electromagnetic resistance." It should be noted that previously only the USA and the Russian Federation had similar opportunities.


    Prompting by this phrase, apparently the range of missiles is still not large enough and you have to enter the air defense zone of a potential enemy. But in connection with the current situation in the South China Sea, the Chinese staged a demonstration for a reason.

    Type such a thought. hi
    1. avia1991 15 October 2015 11: 56 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: Vladimir 1964
      the Chinese staged a demonstration for a reason.

      Yes, they just do nothing at all. But what exactly do they think to themselves - you won’t understand either “dry” or a pint! laughing
      Asians, one word.
      1. Vladimir 1964 15 October 2015 12: 14 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: avia1991
        Yes, they just do nothing at all. But what exactly do they think to themselves - you won’t understand either “dry” or a pint!
        Asians, one word.


        Sergey, good laughing hi
  11. cerbuk6155 15 October 2015 11: 39 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    After the introduction of “our own advanced technologies, well done, everyone copied and spionerel but declare it as their own.” The only thing that is true is that they are developing very quickly and with great cunning they, as if these brothers in the future, did not become enemy No. 1 for RUSSIA. You have to be very careful with them, the USA will bite them and they will rush to seize new lands in the NORTH. You can’t turn your back on them !. soldier
    1. avia1991 15 October 2015 11: 50 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: cerbuk6155
      as if these brothers in the future did not become enemy No. 1 for RUSSIA

      Why should they be at war with us? They have been “quietly expanding” into our territory for a long time. We started from the Far East, in Irkutsk people are already crying that they are unmeasured .. everything will cost peacefully. It is necessary in the brains of our "for all good" rulers to restore order! am
    2. Bayonet 15 October 2015 12: 15 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: cerbuk6155
      The United States is exploring them and they will rush to seize new lands in the NORTH.

      It turns out that the United States is one smart, and the rest of the naive fools with whom they twist twist as they want. It’s strange to hear this, but it flashes in the comments quite often. We do not respect ourselves ... request
  12. mamont5 15 October 2015 11: 42 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: oleg-gr
    Missile range not indicated. If the range is similar to our Caliber, the Americans will not turn up. There will be a lot of scream in the media.

    Yes, and I'm interested. What is the range of their cruise missiles?
  13. ilyaches 15 October 2015 11: 44 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Now the Americans will be convinced that the world is not becoming unipolar.
  14. avia1991 15 October 2015 11: 47 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Chinese strategic bomber H-6K
    (more precisely, Tu-16 laughing ) FIRST TIME SUCCESSFULLY ...!
    A dashing mischief began: the Chinas develop, they steal it, then peep .. and most importantly, they have already grown up their scientists, and they will inevitably be pulled up to the world level - something, but they will not occupy perseverance and determination!
    Our "liberalists" should learn a little bit from them patriotism ..
    1. Karlovar 15 October 2015 14: 09 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Since the Opium Wars in China for more than 100 years there have been wars (including civil ones), interventions, uprisings, revolutions ... In these 100 years of science, there was practically no science in China ... They practically started from scratch! In such a situation, the most effective way from the point of view of money and time is copying ... Then there is a creative rethinking of the copied, then own developments ...., it’s only time, and the nearest one, and their demography only makes the task easier (according to statistics in China has more gifted children than children in Russia in general) ... By the way, the USSR went the same way from the 30s (copied from the West), Europe began from the Renaissance era by copying Arab achievements, Arabs from the early Middle Ages started by copying ancient Greek and the ancient Roman heritage (the joke is that at the same time in Europe the works of the Greeks and Romans were burned, they were copying the Romans in the bastard, thereby stopping progress, moreover, they rolled back in development, many Roman technologies were lost, because times and called the dark Middle Ages) ...
  15. Alexey RA 15 October 2015 11: 48 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The Chinese strategic bomber H-6K succeeded for the first time in launching high-precision cruise missiles at long range on land and sea targets.

    Is this, is it, the Chinese version of the X-55? Pomnitsa, in the early 2000s, Ukraine sold half a dozen of these ALCMs to China ...
  16. Mountain shooter 15 October 2015 11: 57 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    Not, of course, the news is strong, but compared to Caliber it’s too small. He has not yet grown a dragon or claws or teeth. We have to growl louder to at least scare.
    1. avia1991 15 October 2015 12: 13 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      He has not yet grown a dragon or claws or teeth.

      This is more than compensated by the size of their army, as well as individual training, not particularly inferior to the fighters of the leading armed forces, and not bad, by the way, weapons. They have ballistic missiles - and there the question of "high accuracy" is not particularly fundamental wassat
      And as for the "exact" missiles - remember, in the days of the USSR, when graters with Mao were? In response to Khrushchev’s attack on nuclear weapons, he said something like: “Nothing - we have enough people, if necessary, to bring the atomic bomb to the Kremlin in our hands!” And it's true .. hi
    2. Karlovar 15 October 2015 14: 14 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      The little dragon showed fangs, having established AIIB, BRICS Bank, the Hong Kong Gold Exchange, demonstrating the possibility of influencing quotes on the New York Stock Exchange, blowing up an American military base in Japan in response to an explosion in the Tianjin port ...
    3. Bayonet 15 October 2015 16: 15 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      e, this of course is strong news, but compared to Caliber it’s too small. He has not yet grown a dragon or claws or teeth.

      As I understand it, do you have data on the performance characteristics of these Chinese missiles? Would share hi
  17. Mama_Cholli 15 October 2015 11: 58 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The Chinese would now be very useful to practice on the ground targets of the IS.
  18. Wolka 15 October 2015 12: 08 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    China has its own task: to keep the political calm in the Far East, while Russia is working in Syria, and it seems they are doing it successfully, too, so to speak, a demonstration of power in the region ...
    1. Karlovar 15 October 2015 14: 18 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      This is called cooperation and the division of labor, in order to save resources (primarily financial) of both countries, and they are endless resources ...
  19. TIO1969 15 October 2015 12: 18 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    In the near future, China will not be drawn into conflicts outside "its region." China is gradually increasing its military capabilities. Goes from quantity to quality. At the same time, he behaves on the verge of a foul, constantly demonstrating his capabilities, his strength. It is developing, not embarrassed to “adopt” the development of other countries, this is already a tradition. But, I must admit, China also creates its own military science, they are trying to get away from banal copying. And there are already successes!
  20. Anchonsha 15 October 2015 12: 42 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    It seems to mattresses with their world leadership that the end is coming not only at sea, but also in the air. China from the West received new technologies in the industry, which it is already transferring to aircraft manufacturing and rocket science.
  21. castle 15 October 2015 12: 50 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    China has never been an ally of Russia and never will be. China is a pragmatist. When China needs it, they will support Russia; when it is necessary, Russia will not be supported. Everything is for himself, and the rest will be set against each other in order to become the Chief Head over all nations. Do not believe? And how many lands in Russia have the Chinese already leased? And you all: "mattresses, but mattresses."
    1. Karlovar 15 October 2015 14: 22 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      And how much land have mattresses taken from the USSR since 1991 ??? Do not know??? And you are all Chinese-Chinese .... By the way, the greatest masters in the history of poisoning are Anglo-Saxons! Read the story, at least from the time of Elizabeth the 1st (English) ...
    2. SIvan 15 October 2015 16: 33 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Why are you repeating nonsense like PUTNOTALSIBRATE?
      In Transbaikalia, only 115000 ha = 1150 sq. M were leased. km = rectangle 23x50 km = not very large collective farm.
      Just. And how it was inflated! When Western companies rent land, you won’t worry so much?
  22. Million 15 October 2015 12: 51 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The Chinese, for now, are friends to us, but I would not like to have such a friend behind my boot
    1. castle 15 October 2015 13: 17 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Why would China "shy away"? Let Russia with the USA and ISIS destroy itself, and then, China will enter there like a kind uncle, a peacemaker, and take everything for itself. Russia will have to bow to the feet of China and promise that if China allows Russia to take two or three bases in Syria, Russia will defend Chinese interests there, and if not with Russia, it will agree with the United States. And if Russia gets into trouble, as it used to be in Afghanistan, China will help the anti-Russian (proto-Soviet) forces.
  23. vlad7777kul 15 October 2015 12: 53 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I doubt that China would use its missiles for real purposes. As usual they pulled a tail across Syria. And they could really shy their missiles at IS targets.
    1. Karlovar 15 October 2015 14: 26 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      What military need to shy away from Chinese missiles on the IG ??? From Sinjiang Uyghur District to Syria there will be lope kilometers ??? In the sense, will missiles reach Syria ???? There is a need to support ground operations! Even the Russian Federation does not bother there, why should China meddle with it?
  24. YaMZ-238 15 October 2015 13: 18 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Well done Chinese .... are growing before our eyes!
  25. Million 15 October 2015 13: 35 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: YaMZ-238
    Well done Chinese .... are growing before our eyes!

    If only they did not crawl to Russia
  26. ML-334 15 October 2015 14: 29 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    So far, I don’t see warriors in the Chinese, there are a lot of show-offs, you won’t take away. There is no case, where did you show strength of mind? There is an opportunity to prove ourselves in the same Iraq, which does not work out, we will help. And so the cat is in the bag.
  27. cerbuk6155 15 October 2015 17: 29 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Bayonet
    Quote: cerbuk6155
    The United States is exploring them and they will rush to seize new lands in the NORTH.

    It turns out that the United States is one smart, and the rest of the naive fools with whom they twist twist as they want. It’s strange to hear this, but it flashes in the comments quite often. We do not respect ourselves ... request

    The USA is the biggest BOSS among bosses and who doesn’t want to, will be shown how it should be and will poison any and not only any country but also in our country sow its superiority and its fifth column. But RUSSIA has no allies. This is also evident in Ukraine, which has become one of the top five enemies, and more recently, we were a single people, and then what can we say about other countries. And you know that too. They twist and will twirl - do not be naive and do not expose us to a blow in the back. soldier
  28. nafanal 15 October 2015 19: 15 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Somewhere I already saw such a plane. And for a long time. That's what kind of car I can’t remember.