Military Review

US refused to discuss the conflict in Syria with the Russian delegation

50
A spokesman for the White House, Joshua Ernest, said the United States had refused to accept the Russian delegation to discuss the conflict in Syria over Moscow’s reluctance to make a constructive contribution to the fight against the Islamic State terrorist group.




“The goal of this delegation, as Russian President Vladimir Putin said, was to facilitate the coordination of military cooperation between the United States and Russia. We said that we are not interested in this, as long as Russia does not want to make a constructive contribution to our fight against IS, ”the newspaper quotes him. "Sight".

According to the press secretary, Moscow’s calls for cooperation “were not heard not only by the United States, but by the rest of the 65 members of the international antiterrorist coalition fighting the IS”. The official representative of the President of the United States noted that the Russian Federation had its “own agenda” to counter this extremist organization.

“And today they are leading this agenda independently,” Ernest stressed.

According to the White House press secretary, “Russia's attempt to convince the United States to join its actions” speaks only of the isolation of the efforts of the Russian Federation.

"We are ready to welcome the constructive contribution of Russia, which would become part of the ongoing actions of the international coalition to combat the IG, but Russia has a different position," the RIA quoted him as saying "News".

On Wednesday, the press secretary of the Russian president, Dmitry Peskov, expressed regret on this issue, stating that the refusal of dialogue does not contribute to the speedy release of the region from the Islamic State.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
50 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. inkass_98
    inkass_98 15 October 2015 08: 56 New
    +3
    Experience does not teach people anything. In any case, the union of the USA, England and the USSR in World War II was better than the war with the Axis alone.
    1. SRC P-15
      SRC P-15 15 October 2015 09: 00 New
      +17
      We said that we were not interested in this, as long as Russia did not want to make a constructive contribution to our fight against the Islamic State, ”the Vzglyad newspaper quoted him as saying.

      "Constructive contribution" of Russia-not to bomb IS? Do they want to say that?
      1. SSR
        SSR 15 October 2015 09: 05 New
        +7
        Quote: SRC P-15
        We said that we were not interested in this, as long as Russia did not want to make a constructive contribution to our fight against the Islamic State, ”the Vzglyad newspaper quoted him as saying.

        "Constructive contribution" of Russia-not to bomb IS? Do they want to say that?

        I’m not too lazy and duplicate what I wrote on another branch. It’s just that insanity is getting stronger, but I don’t see another explanation.


        After such statements with such blunders (about 25 years of bombing and the war in Yugoslavia) that the world elite winds up a society of people to conceal something more global .... Like that under the slogan aaa "fight against green aggressors, aaa fight against usa and Islamists , aah with the Zionists ".... We’ll live for ten years and then we won’t notice that we’ve been living for seven years with chips in a hole and that’s all in the wake of hysteria.

        Here's how to circulate the executed executions - so the United States is ahead of all, the people of the whole world were cheated except hohlov and how the Russian Federation began the fight against them - so immediately the Russian aggressor ......
        World-wide insanity grows stronger.
        Inflation also goes in a spiral with the involvement of ever larger states.
        1. oblako
          oblako 15 October 2015 09: 37 New
          +4
          As long as the word does not coincide with the deed and they receive money for the words, one can judge something or someone only by his deeds. Separate the grain from the verbal chaff and everything will become clear. It’s like with business medicine more profit — a successful doctor and fewer healthy people. no longer examined.)
          1. bulvas
            bulvas 15 October 2015 09: 49 New
            +1

            The fight against ISIS and calls for cooperation from other countries are one level of operation.

            According to the results of these levels, other, third and so on levels will appear with their results.

            The game is led by the GROSSMASTER, the rest of the players are only trying to adjust.



            1. Alena Frolovna
              Alena Frolovna 15 October 2015 11: 32 New
              +2
              Quote: SRC P-15
              We said that we were not interested in this, as long as Russia did not want to make a constructive contribution to our fight against the Islamic State, ”the Vzglyad newspaper quoted him as saying.


              "Constructive contribution" of Russia-not to bomb IS? Do they want to say that?


      2. aleks700
        aleks700 15 October 2015 09: 45 New
        +1
        "Constructive contribution" of Russia-not to bomb IS? Do they want to say that?
        Assad bombing - that's constructive.
      3. Kaccad
        Kaccad 15 October 2015 10: 14 New
        0
        It will be "moderately", but not yet "constructive" :) But constructively - throw off your 50t. "gum. help."
        1. ZU-23
          ZU-23 15 October 2015 10: 56 New
          +1
          So their brain can’t even stand the high-intellectual conversation imposed by our delegation, especially since they are not even right and live side by side with a needle.
        2. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Now we are free
      Now we are free 15 October 2015 09: 02 New
      +6
      Greetings Yuri hi

      Quote: inkass_98
      Experience does not teach people anything. In any case, the union of the USA, England and the USSR in World War II was better than the war with the Axis alone.

      Yeah ... If you also take into account that Britain also gently cultivated Hitler Hitler, feeding him with all sorts of Czech Republics, Austria, Poland ... so that he would resist the export of communism to Europe and the US magnates in particular Henry Ford sponsored fascist Germany, for every birthday Hitler I received a gift from Ford in the form of a check for 50 thousand dollars ... And now ask yourself for whom the USA and Co. are growing ISIS today feeding it Iraq, Syria, Libya? ..
      1. your1970
        your1970 15 October 2015 11: 50 New
        0
        Well, let’s put France, they are already occupying, even without rocking the French army ...
    4. vovanpain
      vovanpain 15 October 2015 09: 06 New
      +11
      the stripes want to be like the boss in this coalition, bomb that excavator, and don't get in there, you see our bombs hit not only the igil, but they also hit the wallets of the Amer magnates and Middle Eastern sheikhs and bumpkins.
    5. Gorjelin
      Gorjelin 15 October 2015 09: 07 New
      +1
      White House spokeswoman Joshua Ernest said the United States refused to accept the Russian delegation


      Experience does not teach people anything. In any case, the union of the USA, England and the USSR in World War II was better than the war with the Axis alone.


      Yes, there’s just nothing stupid to say to them, they’re afraid once again to get rid of the whole world
      No position, no result, only armor
    6. Finches
      Finches 15 October 2015 09: 09 New
      +2
      ISIS for the USA - son of a bitch, but their son of a bitch! Although the refusal to discuss it may alert the Europeans ... Apparently the United States will go to the bank in Syria ... And this is not a very good call, it smelled of 1980 ....
    7. marlin1203
      marlin1203 15 October 2015 09: 29 New
      0
      Nah ... well, the Americans are scorching, which is already indecent even.
    8. Vend
      Vend 15 October 2015 09: 51 New
      +1
      Quote: inkass_98
      Experience does not teach people anything. In any case, the union of the USA, England and the USSR in World War II was better than the war with the Axis alone.

      It is not only a matter of experience. Well, after such antics, can the countries of the world continue to obey the United States. After all, it becomes clear who is who. It is either necessary to participate in the US business to the ears, or to be so intimidated that before insanity.
      1. jjj
        jjj 15 October 2015 10: 10 New
        +2
        And I liked how the States deprived the illusions of our democratic lover of iPhones. Now, apparently, the government will become more patriotic
        1. olimpiada15
          olimpiada15 15 October 2015 11: 04 New
          0
          Very correct comment100 +.
          Maybe DAM will think about whether it is necessary to bend Russia so under the world economy, led by the states in their interests.
    9. V.ic
      V.ic 15 October 2015 10: 32 New
      +2
      And "them", our sworn "partners" do you need it? In any case, according to the "arrogant Saxons", the Russian bear should carry chestnuts from the fire for them
  2. artist-mamluk
    artist-mamluk 15 October 2015 09: 02 New
    +7
    Why the hell is such an ally needed. Such "friends" and enemies are not needed.
  3. Tusv
    Tusv 15 October 2015 09: 03 New
    0
    I rephrase the joke.
    Barack, did you talk to Putin? How did you guess? So you nodded for half an hour.
    The US military has already accepted Putin’s plan for Syria. How much can you humiliate a great and exceptional nation. It is necessary to somehow comprehend, survive.
  4. GRAY
    GRAY 15 October 2015 09: 03 New
    +1
    It's funny to watch this circus. I presume that the Kremlin could not have foreseen such a reaction.
    1. bocsman
      bocsman 15 October 2015 09: 09 New
      +2
      Quote: GRAY
      It's funny to watch this circus. I presume that the Kremlin could not have foreseen such a reaction.

      Moscow complied with the formalities. And now, not very respected partners, sorry! You yourself have refused to cooperate!
    2. tongilguk
      tongilguk 15 October 2015 09: 43 New
      +1
      Answer clearly memorized phrase:
      while Russia does not want to make a constructive contribution in our the fight against IG

      What would that mean? And why should we make any contribution to their fight?

      Apparently they looked at what we are doing in Syria and decided to overestimate the threats to their country. And it turned out that Russia is a more terrible threat to them than ISIS. And then they put us in second place. You can’t do that. We are offended. And now everything seems to fall into place.
  5. venaya
    venaya 15 October 2015 09: 04 New
    +2
    Moscow’s calls for cooperation “were not heard not only by the United States, but also by the remaining 65 members of the international anti-terror coalition fighting IS

    Yes, they’re not fighting ISIS, but for their selfish interests, like real jackals and nothing else.
  6. Penetrator
    Penetrator 15 October 2015 09: 05 New
    +2
    And the prime minister should have led the delegation, and then there was such a demarche from the side of the Americans dearly loved by him. Therefore, so that Nedimon was not upset, they awarded him the highest order of the Russian Federation
    Russian President Vladimir Putin awarded Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev the Order of Merit to the Fatherland, I degree, for his great contribution to the socio-economic development of the Russian Federation

    This thing is in every way cooler than even the sixth iPhone ... Next time, probably, the Hero of Russia will be given for "outstanding services to the state, a great contribution to the socio-economic development of the Russian Federation."
  7. biron
    biron 15 October 2015 09: 05 New
    +1
    Quote: SRC P-15
    We said that we were not interested in this, as long as Russia did not want to make a constructive contribution to our fight against the Islamic State, ”the Vzglyad newspaper quoted him as saying.

    "Constructive contribution" of Russia-not to bomb IS? Do they want to say that?

    so igil baby mattresses fool
  8. gukoyan
    gukoyan 15 October 2015 09: 05 New
    +1
    Of course, it is not profitable for them to destroy their brainchild, therefore, a constructive dialogue will not work.
  9. Frigate
    Frigate 15 October 2015 09: 06 New
    +1
    On the other hand, why knock on a closed door. If it is clear, and so, who created ISIS and supports it, will it help to destroy it against the one against whom it created it.))
  10. sl22277
    sl22277 15 October 2015 09: 08 New
    +2
    USA "constructively" evade to destroy its brainchild of the IG. In order for there to be a “constructive” contribution, it is necessary to meet, and not to close the door in front of the nose.
  11. Wolka
    Wolka 15 October 2015 09: 10 New
    +2
    Of course, the Yankees disagree on Russia's unconstructive contribution to the war in Syria, which should be understood as the complete destruction of the Islamic State as a terrorist structure of world terrorism, and in the region in particular, because this monster (IS) was born by them, and with the destruction of the Islamic State Yankees they simply lose all control in the region once and for all + the seriously tarnished authority of the "superpower", which is incomprehensible ...
  12. Zomanus
    Zomanus 15 October 2015 09: 10 New
    +2
    In short, we either lie under the United States and act at their direction, or on our own.
    We made our choice ...
    The United States can also be understood if we, as part of a coalition with them, continue to peck at IS
    then the IG sheep will have uncomfortable questions for the States.
  13. bugrovata
    bugrovata 15 October 2015 09: 12 New
    +1
    Because Russia is fighting ISIS, and the Amerian coalition with ISIS is fighting Assad!
    Therefore, different goals, different tasks!
  14. olimpiada15
    olimpiada15 15 October 2015 09: 15 New
    0
    The Russian Federation is trying to help the Syrians push the terrorists away from Latakia and the surrounding areas, which is logical.
    This states really does not want, because the strengthening of Assad’s positions breaks all their plans for the dismemberment of the country. Here are the Yankees and they are dirty as they can, they intrigue, they accuse of incorrect bombing, but they don’t give the coordinates of the correct bombing, they refuse to discuss that there was an excuse to discredit Russia.
    Well, the United States is not going to destroy ISIS-its offspring.
  15. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 15 October 2015 09: 16 New
    +6
    Notice the peasants of Russia (unlike other countries) before waving a "club", offers to come to an agreement peacefully ... But they usually don’t go to meet us! That's when all positions were handed over and everyone was destroyed (humpback, ebn), then applause and " cute smiles with a grin of jackals "...
    It is our business to offer, and then we are not to blame if anyone falls under the distribution by chance ... bully
  16. roskot
    roskot 15 October 2015 09: 24 New
    +2
    I will not play with you.
    1. leo3972
      leo3972 15 October 2015 09: 34 New
      +1
      Pronounced photo 5+ good
    2. orphan 63
      orphan 63 15 October 2015 09: 41 New
      0


      “I won’t play with you” - You won’t !? Well, get out of here ...... laughing
      1. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 15 October 2015 09: 50 New
        0
        Quote: Orphan 63
        “I won’t play with you” - You won’t !? Well, get out of here ......

        "abrams" trophy?
    3. Uncle lee
      Uncle lee 15 October 2015 09: 48 New
      +6
      Quote: roskot
      I won’t play with you

      Colorado: - "Well, why aren’t you a societal people, gringo!"
      K-f. "McKenna Gold"
  17. Vadim12
    Vadim12 15 October 2015 09: 26 New
    +1
    States are very understandable. They are confused that now it’s not only they who decide that someone is not afraid of them. And also beats their man-made terrorist kids. The most intrusive thing is that they can do nothing. Well, nuclear war is not an option. In the poisonous ice desert, then you will not spend dollars anywhere.
  18. Batia
    Batia 15 October 2015 09: 27 New
    +2
    The Yankees, as always, climb on someone else's hump. And having connected with Russia in a swoop will be in the backyards. And hegemony will be in the favorite place of geyropov.
  19. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 15 October 2015 09: 29 New
    +1
    It’s one thing to shout from the stands and in the press about the “wrong actions of Russia,” and another thing - having no clear reasoning to answer specific questions and proposals of the Russian military and diplomats face to face. There is nothing to cover, but "la-la, poplar" at such meetings are perceived unambiguously.
  20. roskot
    roskot 15 October 2015 09: 32 New
    +1
    Medvedev is waiting for an invitation to resolve the situation in the state kindergarten.
    1. Ratnik555
      Ratnik555 15 October 2015 11: 12 New
      0
      It would work better for him here
  21. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 15 October 2015 09: 49 New
    +2
    Terrorists refused to discuss the conflict in Syria with fighters against terrorism. belay
  22. veksha50
    veksha50 15 October 2015 09: 58 New
    +1
    "According to the White House spokesman," Russia's attempt to convince the United States to join its actions "speaks only of the isolation of the efforts of the Russian Federation ..."

    There, this Josh Ernest blurted out again: "This is - hysterical attempt Russia to find a way out of the situation "...

    Well, yes, yes ... Recently, not Russia, but the coalition created by the USA, have been hysterical ...
  23. radogos
    radogos 15 October 2015 10: 07 New
    +1
    Puppet Theatre!
  24. 5344443243366
    5344443243366 15 October 2015 10: 19 New
    +1
    Nothing new, everything is predictably an enemy, he is an enemy in Africa
  25. Engineer engineer
    Engineer engineer 15 October 2015 10: 49 New
    +3
    I suggest S. Lavrov to be nominated for a Nobel in literature for the phrase: "D-ly, b * me!" Well, you understand what I mean ...
    1. olimpiada15
      olimpiada15 15 October 2015 11: 16 New
      +1
      As for Lavrov, it’s just a shame. Why is he not awarded? Already someone, but he deserved rewards both for his labor activity and for the struggle for peace.
  26. Maksus
    Maksus 15 October 2015 10: 49 New
    +1
    Yes, the Americans are simply in shock, they do not know how to react. The 08.08.08 war for them was just a small-town dismantling, well, they did not expect that we had both airplanes and services that could be transferred to another region. They themselves have not yet developed a strategy, and therefore the answers of their officials resemble the bleating of rams - there is no common sane strategy.
    They say that Bush, the youngest, was something he might have been, but under him, US policy was clear and even. And Obama rushes about like this in the hole ...
  27. andrew42
    andrew42 15 October 2015 10: 58 New
    0
    Perfectly! The fool refused a gift! “I mean America.” What should be afraid is the introduction of the United States into the new REAL coalition against the IG and other gangs. This would make the new coalition even more cardboard than the first “pro-NATO" one. This would bind the hands of Russia, Iran and Syria, tedious coordination would begin, draining information bandits to mercenaries. Now you can no longer "diplomat" on the issue of "moderate" or "immoderate" - to wet all the gangs in Syria that did not surrender to Assad’s government troops. According to sound logic, the United States would have to abandon its feeding gangsters in Syria, but cling to them in Iraq, simultaneously portraying "interaction." That's how much I do not convince myself that the States are a well-considered parasitic state, but Zadornov is right:! Well, dumb ..! "Well, how should it be degraded. Where does the Rothschild Tribunal look? Where the hell is it (literally, he is there for the chairman) The Committee of 13? Filled the entire personnel policy, demonic.
  28. pvv113
    pvv113 15 October 2015 11: 00 New
    0
    Moscow’s calls for cooperation “were not heard not only by the United States, but also by the remaining 65 members of the international anti-terrorism coalition fighting IS”

    Who knows - besides two excavators, what damage did ISIS cause the coalition led by mattresses? hi
  29. ma_shlomha
    ma_shlomha 15 October 2015 11: 31 New
    0
    A spokesman for the White House, Joshua Ernest, said the United States had refused to accept the Russian delegation to discuss the conflict in Syria over Moscow’s reluctance to make a constructive contribution to the fight against the Islamic State terrorist group.

    The United States said it could not accept a delegation led by Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev

    Previously, when, under the leadership of President D. Medvedev, the Russian delegation to the UN refrained from supporting the Security Council resolution on Libya under number 1973 on the introduction of a no-fly zone over Libya, the US had no reason to make such a demarche as yesterday.
    They perfectly understood that the Russian leader would not protest against the military intervention of the United States and NATO in the internal conflict under the pretext of protecting peaceful Libyans.
    The establishment of the UN Security Council then the no-fly zone became a carte blanche for the destruction of the Libyan Air Force. At the same time, NATO aviation felt very comfortable in the sky over a flaming republic. Coalition aircraft in Western and Arab countries supplied the rebels with weapons, bombed government troops, and at the same time residential areas. The “peacekeepers" naturally did not bear any responsibility for war crimes in Libya.

    Now, when the power in the Russian Federation has acquired an illiberal (read - pro-Russian) shade, the United States realized that the time of weak politicians in the Russian Federation is ending.
  30. WUS 068
    WUS 068 15 October 2015 11: 35 New
    0
    Exactly - YOUR AGENDA! And you know what they wanted Russia to drag along behind you, obey you. Let yourself line up for Russia yourself and listen to what we tell you!
  31. Astronomer
    Astronomer 15 October 2015 11: 37 New
    +2
    But it seems to me that everything is going according to plan for the GDP. He did not doubt for a minute that the Yankees would refuse to negotiate. The negotiation proposal is the "bandwagon".
    Now look:
    1. The United States refused to exchange intelligence on Syria.
    2. The United States refused to transmit information about the deployment of forces of the "moderate opposition".
    3. The US refused to accept the Russian delegation to discuss the conflict in Syria.
    So Russia continues to act based on its own intelligence, its own ideas about who needs help and who needs to be destroyed.
    In general, "who did not hide - I'm not to blame!".
  32. atamankko
    atamankko 15 October 2015 12: 27 New
    0
    What to talk about with them?