Military Review

Who is instead of Obama?

25
In politics, nothing happens by chance. In big politics all the more. The coming to power of President Barack Obama in 2009 was the result of a consensus of financial elites that in reality determine US domestic and foreign policy. The same elite eight years earlier brought Bush Jr. to power, who was ordered to start wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Miscalculations in such a “cowboy strategy came to light pretty soon. As it turned out, the current America, in contrast to the American 1940, is no longer able to wage two wars at the same time. All mistakes were written off to Bush, and they quickly removed him, and Obama came to the forefront, gleaming with a snow-white smile, who was faced with the task of curtailing the immediate American presence in the conflict zones without losing control of them.




The second fundamental foreign policy goal was to re-create a system of global dominance in a format that would practically exclude the direct participation of US forces in direct conflicts or would reduce such participation to a minimum. Under Obama, emphasis was placed on the widespread incitement of regional clashes through illegal regime changes, territorial disputes, as well as the deepening of interethnic and religious contradictions. As a result, a relatively stable world turned into a solid battlefield with completely unclear prospects. Achievement worthy of the Nobel Peace Prize!

Spent a thousand times smaller amounts of money on provocations and coups than on direct military invasions, and in this sense Obama turned out to be an “energy-saving” president, although history his country, he clearly will enter a very ambiguous person. Many US citizens do not like the current head of state for quite objective reasons. His narcissism, habits and inability to articulate his thoughts clearly have long been the subject of ridicule. Separate dislike deserved his health care reform and flirting with sexual minorities.

And yet now the foreign policy has come to the fore, where the costs of “controlled chaos” are visible to the naked eye, including simple people in the street. The host of the White House is criticized, for example, because it does not in any way prevent Beijing from building artificial islands in the South China Sea, or for having “surrendered” the Crimea and the Middle East to Putin. At the same time, Putin’s foreign policy is compared in the leading United States media with Obama’s policy not in favor of the latter.

Of course, this does not mean that the American political analysts were smitten with love for the Russian president or began to have respect for him. They have neither one nor the other. The explanation is much simpler: America is being prepared for the arrival of the next leader, fundamentally different from Obama. Time saving resources has passed. The era of the next expansionism begins.

The new president, whoever he may be, will begin with “correcting mistakes” and “returning positions” that Obama has passed. But here's the problem: Barack Obama hasn't really stepped back from anywhere. Moreover, in some areas, the US position has become much stronger and more confident, at relatively low costs. A typical example is Ukraine. As an asset, the black leader can also record significant promotion of TTIP and TPP contracts. As for the chaos in the Middle East, there, as they say, everything goes according to plan ...

Under the slogan of returning positions surrendered to Obama, unprecedented interventions around the world are being prepared - into those parts of it that for some reason are not fully controlled by the hegemon. These are China, Russia, Iran and the whole Caspian Sea in general, the north of Korea (very rich in mineral resources), as well as the Arctic. The resources of these regions to the United States should be enough for another 20-30 years at the current level of consumption. Accordingly, the American “perestroika” is postponed for the same period.

The methods by which the “mistakes” will be corrected are also seen long before the new head of the White House takes office. Already, the US presidential candidates are stating the need to introduce a no-fly zone over Syria and shoot down Russian attack aircraft. If someone thinks that this is just pre-election rhetoric, such as Reagan's antics, he is deeply mistaken or engaged in self-deception. Before us is quite an objective trend. The United States is preparing to fight, fight a lot, and of course with an eye to the complete victory. Not in vain so many decades created such a mighty fleet? If you do not use it in the fight for resources today, then tomorrow the ships will have to be cut for metal, since even a world gendarme will not be able to maintain such a powerful armada. The threat of nuclear war to the American elite is much less scary than the loss of global domination.

In a recent interview for the CBS channel, President Obama made it almost openly indicated that his goal was Russia's capitulation through its exhaustion. But, apparently, he realizes that he personally has no chance to see the desired result in the presidential chair, and all possible laurels will go to his successor.

Obama, of course, is hardly as stupid as political opponents attribute this quality to him. Nevertheless, he has already played his role in the presidency, and as a leader he is gradually being written off as scrap. The time has come for new faces and new slogans.
Author:
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Siberia55
    Siberia55 15 October 2015 06: 07 New
    15
    Yes, even the hell the bald plant there ... It's just a talking head, and decisions are made anyway by others ...
    1. beitar
      beitar 15 October 2015 07: 28 New
      +5
      Obama surpassed even Jimmy Carter in his insignificance and mediocrity. Moreover, I am sure that Obama hates America and American values. Clintonsha is also not the best option. Who can surprise in a good way is Ben Carson or Marco Rubio. America and the whole world, as air, need an adequate, sane President-Republican.
      1. Tatyana
        Tatyana 15 October 2015 07: 48 New
        +8
        Quote from the article.
        China, Russia, Iran and the entire Caspian, northern Korea (very rich in minerals), as well as the Arctic. The resources of these regions should be enough for the United States for another 20-30 years at the current level of consumption. ... The era of the next expansionism begins.

        Great analytical article.
        In other words, this is about CRIMINAL Consensus of US Financial Elitesalready embarking on a decision about the beginning of the third world war.
        Forewarned - means already armed!
        In this case, need to make sure US financial elite guaranteed to receive would for it finally your personal killer retribution.
      2. marlin1203
        marlin1203 15 October 2015 09: 51 New
        +3
        Trump for President! This one, though in economic terms, operates, and not the notorious "exclusivity".
        1. ronin201
          ronin201 15 October 2015 14: 55 New
          -4
          Who cares who the president is in the states, it’s not the president who rules a narrow group of people, the president is only a representative person, the KGB rules in Russia and Putin is a representative person.
          1. Sterlya
            Sterlya 16 October 2015 00: 14 New
            +1
            Quote: ronin201
            Who cares who the president is in the states, it’s not the president who rules a narrow group of people, the president is only a representative person, the KGB rules in Russia and Putin is a representative person.

            Vaughn said. Minus with me.
            Do not confuse your talking firebrand and Putin
            1. ronin201
              ronin201 16 October 2015 07: 18 New
              0
              the grandmother is just a miserable PR man, and Putin simply studied correctly and makes excellent use of all methods of psychological influence on the masses. you can continue to believe your illusions, but it’s not ruled by leaders of states, but by a narrow circle of people who don’t PR at the bomber, with Siberian Cranes, amphora, horseback or hunting rifle ... Stalin didn’t PR by the way. So he was the ruler, and after his death all that he tonsured gradually fell apart.
              1. Sterlya
                Sterlya 16 October 2015 19: 01 New
                0
                not so simple. Maybe it’s easy for you in America, it is not so for us.
                To your regret.
                Putin is the president. And rules Russia! With the approval of the people.
                Against the Baobaobab manipulated by the Rockefellers, and all sorts of bad things, like those who got paid for the scalp of the Indians
      3. Otshelnik
        Otshelnik 15 October 2015 20: 49 New
        +1
        I think rockefellers, Rothschilds, Kissingers, Brzezinski, etc., have already decided who will be the next CEO ...
    2. USSR 1971
      USSR 1971 15 October 2015 07: 28 New
      +7
      Dvorkovich there instead of Obama and Kudrin to help. Everything will go the way. As young people say "infa weaving".
      1. Gomunkul
        Gomunkul 15 October 2015 14: 15 New
        +5
        Dvorkovich there instead of Obama and Kudrin to help.
        The other day they wanted to send Medvedev to them, but they obviously suspected something was wrong and refused. laughing
      2. The comment was deleted.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. The comment was deleted.
  2. Born in the USSR
    Born in the USSR 15 October 2015 06: 21 New
    +1
    It started so well and soberly and so lousy continued ...
  3. parusnik
    parusnik 15 October 2015 06: 35 New
    +5
    The time has come for new faces and new slogans... The time of the radish, gone, the time will come horseradish .. But Russia will not be sweet from this ..
    1. Born in the USSR
      Born in the USSR 15 October 2015 07: 03 New
      +8
      Quote: parusnik
      The time of the radish is gone, the time will come horseradish .. But Russia will not be sweet from this ..

      Both are edible and moreover, delicious! Skillfully cook the main thing wink
  4. sa-ag
    sa-ag 15 October 2015 07: 24 New
    +1
    And who will Trump be?
    1. 341712
      341712 15 October 2015 08: 19 New
      0
      Quote: sa-ag
      sa-ag Today, 07: 24 New
      And who will Trump be?

      Hardly ... More likely Clinton or Christie ...
      And that’s why, about it here ....
      http://chipstone.livejournal.com/2015/10/14/
      1. afdjhbn67
        afdjhbn67 16 October 2015 03: 06 New
        +1
        Quote: Major Yurik
        It's simple, American! Never do to others what you would not want you to do! Well, lie, of course less! negative

        But for Russia it is good that Obama is in power with his throwing and some softness, imagine a "hawk" will come in his place and we will quickly find ourselves on the verge of World War III .. or Russia will have to give way to the Americans in some cases, and Obama is well calculated that gives Putin has enough freedom of choice yes
  5. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 15 October 2015 07: 41 New
    +7
    To be honest, who will be the president before the lantern? The change of the "wedding general" will not change the US policy towards Russia (and we are always worried about this issue). As long as the United States exists for them, Russia will be an enemy and competitor in the international political arena. Therefore, you should not waste time and puzzle over who will replace Obama.
  6. Born in USSR
    Born in USSR 15 October 2015 07: 44 New
    +1
    Right Kudrin Siluanov, Dvorkovich, Fursenko, and others like them. There they belong.
  7. AlNikolaich
    AlNikolaich 15 October 2015 07: 48 New
    +5
    But the situation with the US elections is very strange, ambiguous and undemocratic! American citizen
    not able to directly participate in the elections! Electors vote instead fool
    What the hell is freedom of choice, if always offered for either Republicans or Democrats!
    And more for no one! In Congress, the same garbage! Seats are inherited, or bought!
    Otherwise, is it conceivable to imagine congressional elections where the lively poppy Kane wins!
    Aren't you funny?
    1. Gomunkul
      Gomunkul 15 October 2015 14: 18 New
      +3
      American citizen
      not able to directly participate in the elections! Electors vote instead
      Are our elections better organized? The election of governors was not long ago returned, and the mayors of cities are no longer elected by the people, but by local deputies. You do not observe a certain similarity? wink hi
    2. The comment was deleted.
  8. Tusv
    Tusv 15 October 2015 07: 52 New
    0
    Expansion to the Arctic? No matter how powerful the American fleet is, for the Arctic it is a cardboard fleet. The Arctic will not wait for the exceptional. Expansion to Russia? With power in Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, everything is in order. The next American prez will deal with Putin’s already-formed gang - Nazarbayev-Batsko. The term of presidency which will be enough for the next US condom - let it expand. It will not be sweet with China either. Look in zelkalo gentlemen future green papers. The world is changing
    1. Saratoga833
      Saratoga833 15 October 2015 15: 04 New
      0
      Quote: Tusv
      Putin-Nazarbayev-Batsko-formed gang.

      If this is a "gang" for you, then who are you?
  9. vovanpain
    vovanpain 15 October 2015 08: 27 New
    10
    But whoever was the president of the minke whales, even Mother Teresa, even the homeless from the gateway, is just the talking head of the American oligarchy who imagined themselves to be rulers of the world.
  10. Engineer
    Engineer 15 October 2015 08: 39 New
    +2
    And it doesn’t matter at all who the next president in the USA will be - the rhetoric of the White House does not depend on the president, he only plays the role of Psaki and that’s all.
  11. Xergey
    Xergey 15 October 2015 09: 14 New
    +6
    Dear author, you have analyzed Obama’s work, but there are no questions. Everything is clear and interesting. But tell me on the basis of what materials you prepared an analysis of the future actions of the United States, in fact, everything that is happening in the world now is a contradiction to everything that was written earlier, so the question arises that you so confidently indicate in your article that the United States will radically change the way it affects The world that the introduction of the United States as a no-fly zone is evidence of future aggressions, they planned everywhere and always and if no one bothered them they did it. Do you consider your analysis? what can happen tomorrow, all American papers will be dumped, or the price of oil was taken into account (by the way, no one has predicted confidently the movements in the price of oil for this year, they have increased the range to $ 20-25 maximum) or what will happen to the health of people who participate in the formation of economic component of the planet. In general, there are a lot of questions and for this I would like all the same if you write such articles then what is your analysis based on, and not just unfounded examples. (I don’t put a minus article.)
  12. Neophyte
    Neophyte 15 October 2015 10: 34 New
    +1
    Correcting "mistakes" in the American way is just a pathetic attempt at egocentrism, lost in Syria and Ukraine. The collapse of Ukraine is inevitable, it is pointless to pour funds there, everyone already understands it. It's time to forget the history of this wretched country-Ukraine! Moreover, on the agenda of history "Syria! Isn't it all that simple here? The Entente, that is, the coalition with the United States, will in every possible way interfere with the advancement of government troops to the border with Turkey, and Turkey itself is trying to pursue an independent policy. The deep contradictions will only grow."
  13. Nyrobsky
    Nyrobsky 15 October 2015 10: 35 New
    +5
    Judging by how much Trump has become in the media, both in the US, in the world and in Russia in particular, he will probably become the new president of the United States. No one is as publicized today as Trump. The Bush and Clinton clans have already tired the Americans themselves. As for the mighty fleet that the United States has been building for decades, with the launch of the Caliber from the Caspian region, this factor of military-political pressure, if not nullified, then greatly reduced, since it is no longer necessary to reach a distance of 500-300 km to destroy it. ... The splash will also arrive for 1,5 thousand km. They still cannot come to their senses. To conduct interventions, you need to have a lot of money and a strong economy, and with this, in the short term, the United States will not change for the better soon. Chances are good it will get worse.
    It is clear that in the long run the USA will freeze and will do everything possible to weaken Russia, but during this time the alignment of forces in the world may change in the form of new blocs and coalitions to counter the US.
    It’s just that you don’t have to click and be content with some geopolitical successes, but build up cooperation with China, Iran and other countries — it’s good that the current situation allows us to do this.
    1. motorized rifle
      motorized rifle 15 October 2015 13: 17 New
      0
      At the expense of trump, I agree 100%
  14. Uzzy
    Uzzy 15 October 2015 13: 05 New
    +2
    Under the slogan of returning positions surrendered to Obama, unprecedented interventions around the world are being prepared - into those parts of it that for some reason are not fully controlled by the hegemon. These are China, Russia, Iran and the whole Caspian Sea in general, the north of Korea (very rich in mineral resources), as well as the Arctic. The resources of these regions to the United States should be enough for another 20-30 years at the current level of consumption. Accordingly, the American “perestroika” is postponed for the same period.

    Incredible science fiction! The author on the basis of what you decided so? I especially emphasize this passage. Well, just like the yellow press, and the site is serious!
  15. alicante11
    alicante11 15 October 2015 13: 37 New
    +4
    IMHO, but the Americans will not tolerate the election. This is important November of next year. Can you imagine how much Russia and China will have time to work out in the field of defense during this time? What is the point to wait for amers?
    Also, I do not think that the "world elite" is not afraid of nuclear war. This is perhaps the only one. what is she afraid of. Because they will lose EVERYTHING they had at once. Sitting in bunkers, albeit luxurious ones, after having ruled over most of the 7 billion of the world's population? Incomparable. So this is an option in the most extreme case, if they start pinching, like Hitler in the 45th. Therefore, a US war against Russia is unlikely. Most likely, they will get us through Europe. Eastern Europe is already ready to tear us out with its teeth. But the teeth are rather weak, they cannot cope without amers, and even with amers it is not quick. So the fight is for the neutrality of Western Europe. At least Germany must be taken out of amer's control and then Europe is not afraid of us. And let the Americans butt the Chinese. The dragon is only scary in appearance, but soft and fluffy from the inside. At least in the economy (it will collapse in a month if the Americans stop buying their products), at least in the military sphere.
  16. Michael - 235
    Michael - 235 15 October 2015 20: 21 New
    0
    "Obama, of course, is hardly as stupid as his political opponents attribute this quality to." If this is not the case, then what is the point in publishing an article?
  17. ermolai
    ermolai 16 October 2015 04: 28 New
    +1
    Quote: rotmistr60
    As long as the United States exists, for them Russia will be an enemy and a competitor in the international political arena.

    Well, here you can only add, FSA has such a motto; do you have oil and gas? Then we go to you! they have it at the genetic level, they can capture everything that they can reach, and at the same time, destroying everyone who could even resist hypothetically in the distant future. Indians are an example. annihilate as a nation, and seize the land like no man's land and here all the methods are good, from blankets infected with smallpox to the blunt destruction of bison.
  18. Belousov
    Belousov 16 October 2015 18: 03 New
    0
    In place of Obama will come another absolution as Bush Jr. I’ll try to toughly resolve the issue with Russia, but it won’t work out - then they’ll write off as many predecessors as scrap.
  19. givargi
    givargi 17 October 2015 22: 24 New
    0
    And who will fight? The Americans imbecile, they are not even proud for cannon fodder, they are cowards!