What the ... "Ebola"? Leaders LIH dying like flies
The day before, a whole group of Western media, citing various sources, reported that the second "man" in the so-called "Islamic State" - Fadel Ahmad al-Khayali, nicknamed Haji Mutaza, was liquidated in Iraq. Deutsche Welle, for example, reports that information about the death of Haji Mutaza was confirmed by other representatives of a terrorist group operating in the Middle East. Sources say that an ally of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi was eliminated near the Iraqi city of Mosul as a result of a strike inflicted by the American drone.
After some time, Sky News Arabia TV channel came out with the material that in Iraq (near the refinery in the city of Baiji), it was either killed, or the “commander of combat operations” of ISIL Abu Salman al-Askari died a sudden death, who was considered either left hand ", or" right eye "of the same al-Baghdadi.
From the report:
And last Sunday, Iraqi, Syrian and Egyptian media spread the following statement: in the western part of Iraq (not far from the Syrian border), the country's air force attacked a convoy of cars, one of which was al-Baghdadi itself, considered to be the leader of a terrorist group "Islamic state". Some time after the attack, the first reports appeared that the leader of the igilovtsev was probably seriously injured, if he died of the wounds he had received.
As you can see, in just three days almost all the tip of the odious ISIS fell in Iraq (if, of course, to believe foreign media) ... Death to the brave, not otherwise ... It's strange that some Gerashchenko with a sign “Je suis Abu Salman on Facebook ...
It would seem a terrific success, and you need to stand and applaud the same American drone operators who pressed the right button on the joystick at the most appropriate moment. However, the applause is clearly worth saving for another case, because we should not forget that before the first reports of liquidation, or at least of striking the leaders of ISIL, the same Americans had participated (and continue to participate) in their fabulous operation, against this very LIH as if directed. That is, neither al-Baghdadi, nor al-Hayali, nor al-Askari has been able to track down them in any way, you know, they couldn’t, but here in two or three days right now - bang-bang-bang, and such a gigantic success ...
It is strange that Hillary’s candidate and her famous “Wow!” Were not shown to the most democratised people of the planet ...
So, either two or three have been eliminated - all, naturally, by “direct hits” in the very temechko. The questions “why now?” And “how well did it happen that as many as two leaders in a day?” In this situation will look somewhat strange, if only because the answers to them suggest themselves. After all, it seems that at first there were reports that the Iraqi Air Force planes struck the al-Baghdadi motorcade last Sunday after receiving data at the Baghdad Coordination Center, but later refuted this information in the States, stating that the coordinates were "given by representatives of the American coalition."
In general, the "partners", as they say, burned ... Understanding that the Baghdad Coordination Center, in which Russian experts play an important role, can really reach the top of ISIS and, good, take these Salmans and Abu Bakrov for their long black beards (well, or grab hold of other places with a dead grip), and take it alive, and ask them in detail about the system of functioning of such a desk as ISIS, Washington realized that it was time to merge the “top”. And merges ... No one, by and large, can neither confirm nor deny information about the real destruction of at least two leaders of the Islamic State militants, as no one can either confirm or deny even the very fact of their existence, and therefore in the West and they decided: well, if so, let it be as if they were all killed ...
And what ... Very, I must say, convenient. If we consider that the Western media themselves and “appointed” al-Baghdadi in their materials as the leader of the group, then they can afford the tip of ISIS and “bury”. Given the sentimental biography of the "sheikh", in which there is even such a moment as a personal meeting with the then CIA head Petraeus in a special prison in Iraqi territory, followed by a wonderful release in 2009, we can put it in the words of a classic: I gave birth to you, I will kill you. "Kill", if not real, then at least information - let, they say, they think that ISIS is "decapitated".
Why this play?
Well, first, as already mentioned, all of a sudden pro-government Iraqis would really be able to “closely meet” the same “right and left hands” of al-Baghdadi as prisoners after performing successful operations under the auspices of the Baghdad Coordination Center. After all, they could tell a lot about the participation of Petraeus in the miraculous release of the future "sheikh" from the CIA special prison with the subsequent ascent of the head of the IG to his "throne". And how Senator McCain handles a pen with the same al-Baghdadi ...
And, secondly, the States need to gain at least some points, given the real military successes of Russia in Syria, which do not leave a stone unturned from militants. However, one needs to feed one's “exclusivity”, a belief in which has been somewhat shaken even by those who yesterday did not doubt the exclusivity of the States and the unipolarity of this world.
After some time, Sky News Arabia TV channel came out with the material that in Iraq (near the refinery in the city of Baiji), it was either killed, or the “commander of combat operations” of ISIL Abu Salman al-Askari died a sudden death, who was considered either left hand ", or" right eye "of the same al-Baghdadi.
From the report:
The Iraqi province of Salah al-Din declare the death of one of the leaders of the terrorist organization, the commander of military operations LIH Abu Salman al-Askari.
And last Sunday, Iraqi, Syrian and Egyptian media spread the following statement: in the western part of Iraq (not far from the Syrian border), the country's air force attacked a convoy of cars, one of which was al-Baghdadi itself, considered to be the leader of a terrorist group "Islamic state". Some time after the attack, the first reports appeared that the leader of the igilovtsev was probably seriously injured, if he died of the wounds he had received.
As you can see, in just three days almost all the tip of the odious ISIS fell in Iraq (if, of course, to believe foreign media) ... Death to the brave, not otherwise ... It's strange that some Gerashchenko with a sign “Je suis Abu Salman on Facebook ...
It would seem a terrific success, and you need to stand and applaud the same American drone operators who pressed the right button on the joystick at the most appropriate moment. However, the applause is clearly worth saving for another case, because we should not forget that before the first reports of liquidation, or at least of striking the leaders of ISIL, the same Americans had participated (and continue to participate) in their fabulous operation, against this very LIH as if directed. That is, neither al-Baghdadi, nor al-Hayali, nor al-Askari has been able to track down them in any way, you know, they couldn’t, but here in two or three days right now - bang-bang-bang, and such a gigantic success ...
It is strange that Hillary’s candidate and her famous “Wow!” Were not shown to the most democratised people of the planet ...
So, either two or three have been eliminated - all, naturally, by “direct hits” in the very temechko. The questions “why now?” And “how well did it happen that as many as two leaders in a day?” In this situation will look somewhat strange, if only because the answers to them suggest themselves. After all, it seems that at first there were reports that the Iraqi Air Force planes struck the al-Baghdadi motorcade last Sunday after receiving data at the Baghdad Coordination Center, but later refuted this information in the States, stating that the coordinates were "given by representatives of the American coalition."
In general, the "partners", as they say, burned ... Understanding that the Baghdad Coordination Center, in which Russian experts play an important role, can really reach the top of ISIS and, good, take these Salmans and Abu Bakrov for their long black beards (well, or grab hold of other places with a dead grip), and take it alive, and ask them in detail about the system of functioning of such a desk as ISIS, Washington realized that it was time to merge the “top”. And merges ... No one, by and large, can neither confirm nor deny information about the real destruction of at least two leaders of the Islamic State militants, as no one can either confirm or deny even the very fact of their existence, and therefore in the West and they decided: well, if so, let it be as if they were all killed ...
And what ... Very, I must say, convenient. If we consider that the Western media themselves and “appointed” al-Baghdadi in their materials as the leader of the group, then they can afford the tip of ISIS and “bury”. Given the sentimental biography of the "sheikh", in which there is even such a moment as a personal meeting with the then CIA head Petraeus in a special prison in Iraqi territory, followed by a wonderful release in 2009, we can put it in the words of a classic: I gave birth to you, I will kill you. "Kill", if not real, then at least information - let, they say, they think that ISIS is "decapitated".
Why this play?
Well, first, as already mentioned, all of a sudden pro-government Iraqis would really be able to “closely meet” the same “right and left hands” of al-Baghdadi as prisoners after performing successful operations under the auspices of the Baghdad Coordination Center. After all, they could tell a lot about the participation of Petraeus in the miraculous release of the future "sheikh" from the CIA special prison with the subsequent ascent of the head of the IG to his "throne". And how Senator McCain handles a pen with the same al-Baghdadi ...
And, secondly, the States need to gain at least some points, given the real military successes of Russia in Syria, which do not leave a stone unturned from militants. However, one needs to feed one's “exclusivity”, a belief in which has been somewhat shaken even by those who yesterday did not doubt the exclusivity of the States and the unipolarity of this world.
- Alexei Volodin
- https://www.facebook.com/barackobama
Information