Hamsters started thinking ...
There are global processes of changing the development paradigm in the world. And this does not always happen within the framework of global governance. Not all of the plans behind the scenes, not all ... However, to notice this, you need to look for information in addition to the media, under the tight control of media magnates like Murdoch. The plans of the oligarchy to change the political map of the world can be found on some information leaks. For example, in 2007, a retired US Army general, Wesley Clark, told the world about Pentagon’s plans for US military operations in 7 countries. Without any justification. As the general himself said about his conversation with the representative of the General Staff:
"And after a few weeks, I ask him again [to the general from the general staff]: so what did they decide? Are we attacking Iraq or not? And he answers: Okay, Iraq. Look, what did I get out of the [cabinet of defense] today? Over the next 5 years, we dismantle 7 countries. We start with Iraq. Then we have plans for Syria and Lebanon. Libya, Somalia, Sudan. And we finish in Iran. "
You can see the full video with the statements of the general:
Today we can already say that the general did not lie. It is not clear just why Yemen is not in the list, where the situation is developing in a similar way. Perhaps he was inserted into the plan later. Well, so everything goes as part of the plan - Iraq has long been finished, the war is in Libya, it is on fire in Syria, Sudan is destroyed and the situation is also on the verge of war, Lebanon and Somalia are next in line. Well, about Iran, no one doubts - the attack on him is only a matter of time. The problem, however, is that the well-developed scenario of changing undesirable finintern modes, which has already worked several times, may stumble upon some unforeseen circumstances and fail. In particular, the courage and even the heroism of a people who do not want such changes from the outside, can become a serious problem for the plan’s executives. The talent, perseverance and strategic genius of the representatives of the legitimate "authoritarian" power, which they are trying to remove, can also stop the planned process of "democratization." Colonel Gaddafi, the leader of the socialist Jamahiriya, has been holding the defense of a small African country for more than half a year; he has broken all the records of his predecessors in terms of the duration of resistance, despite very limited resources. Thus, it delays a similar “democratization process” in Syria. Unfortunately, about the success of the colonel can be found only from independent sources. Really independent. Here, for example, the latest reports:
Additional parts of the NATO Special Forces have now been sent to Tripoli, ostensibly to organize security for the Hillary Clinton meeting. Three thousand marines were deployed under Tripoli to help the PNS militants and airport security. There, under this protection, the US Secretary of State holds meetings. Of course, such assistance PNS can outweigh the scales, which was already on the side of Gaddafi. But, regardless of the results of the new battle for the capital, we can say that the civil war in Libya is far from over, the support of Gaddafi by the people turned out to be very large and the war begins to acquire the character of national liberation. And the role of NATO as an occupier is becoming more and more obvious. And this, by the way, has already given rise to blocking a similar decision on sanctions against Syria through the UN Security Council, to which the US authorities were not very happy. The UN, which is covering up the aggressive plans of the United States, could not help the main “peacemaker” of the planet and the bombs on Syria have not yet fallen. In general, the war machine began to slow down because of little Libya and the staunch colonel.
But these are not all the failures of the Finintern lately. As a result of the crisis of the economic system of capitalism, which basically owes bankers usury, people began to wake up doubts about the correctness of such a device finance. Among the "office hamsters" there were also such that they began to somehow reflect on the causes of the recent cataclysms and there were those that practically got to the bottom of the truth! Of course, a professor of geography (!) David Harvey (David Harvey) can hardly be called a "hamster", but also a specialist on economic issues is also not called. Nevertheless, he gave an excellent lecture on economics:
On the Internet, a lot of clips appeared explaining the problems. Even in the form of rap that surprised me at all:
Click on the "SS" button to read Russian subtitles - translation (thanks to Lev Kravetsky - http://lex-kravetski.livejournal.com/384225.html). Pleasure guaranteed.
It seems that the real economy can now be studied by everyone except economists, who, judging by everything, are still selected as students in terms of loyalty to the interests of banking clans. Nevertheless, the process of general economic education went to the masses and gave its effect - in the form of mass protests against the “banksters”:
The action "Capture Wall Street" was very large-scale and was held on many cities peace with a corresponding change in the slogan - from Capture Washington, to Capture Rome and Capture Berlin.
In Rome, by the way, a peaceful demonstration turned into clashes with the police and pogroms.
And on Wall Street, she was a peaceful, financial elite, against which slogans were shouted, glanced at the demonstrators with smiles.
The main slogan of the demonstrators is "We are 99%!" it was even accepted and confirmed by it - "Yes, we are 1%". Such a poster they put in response to the windows. Like what? What can you do?
In the following days, demonstrators were driven out of Wall Street by the police, now this street is completely blocked.
Demonstrators continue to march through the streets of New York and other US cities under very tight police custody.
I believe that the financial elite in vain so dismissive of such performances. One way or another, the process affects the alignment of political forces on the planet. And the recent parliamentary elections in France have shown that they need to worry. The French left for the first time in 50 years took the Senate:
September 25 held Senate elections in France, marked by the historic success of the opposition: for the first time in the history of the Fifth Republic, the left gained an absolute majority in the upper house of parliament. The ruling party, led by Nicolas Sarkozy, once again called the elections lost to the socialists "insignificant", and it seems that the French right is gradually losing touch with reality. The most noticeable success among the left-wing parties in the Sunday elections to the upper house of the French parliament was achieved by socialists. According to preliminary data as of 27 September, the coalition of the Socialist Party and the Green Party received additional mandates by the 28 vote. Thus, in the new Senate, socialists will get 143 seats against 115, which they controlled in the chamber of the last convocation. The conditional allies of the socialists — two senate groups that unite communists, republicans, and left-wing radicals — can only boast of having retained their positions. However, this is also a good result, especially since the personal success of the socialist coalition turned out to be so significant that as a result, for the first time since 1958, the left parties will receive an absolute majority in the Luxembourg Palace. According to preliminary estimates, the 177 Senate seats from 348 will be in the hands of the socialists and their allies after the elections. The main question in this regard is how the results of the elections to the Senate will affect the alignment of political forces in France, and most importantly, how they will affect the outcome of the presidential elections scheduled for April 2012 of the year. Especially observers are concerned about the fate of the ruling right, led by the current president, Nicolas Sarkozy.
The pole of Europe has already begun. How does this process affect the United States? Congress recently rejected Obama’s proposal to combat unemployment. The president launched an initiative to adopt a plan in the amount of 447 billion dollars to reduce unemployment in the United States, which is currently kept in America at the conditional official level of 9,1%. This was a mistake of the parliament. Fraught with the fact that the next parliament will already be very different from this. For Obama's proposal was very wise, it held back the course of the crisis, kept the position of the financial oligarchy stable at the expense of new public debts. Their new portion had no effect on the stability of the system and only pushed the obvious end. The new wave of crisis will bring new masses of the population to the streets and its performances will no longer be so peaceful - the activity of the population is inversely proportional to its well-being. The evening of capitalism ceases to be languid ...
Information