Media: preparing to send to Syria the party of Russian T-72 and BMP-2

The Syrian army may soon receive the long-awaited Russian armored vehicles - T-72 and BMP-2, at least the accumulation of such equipment "in characteristic Syrian camouflage" was recorded in one of the southern ports of Russia, the agency writes Messenger of Mordovia.

During the war years, the Syrian army suffered heavy losses in tanks and other armored vehicles. Now, in the context of the unfolding offensive against the positions of the Islamists, the Syrians are forced to fight on old and vulnerable to enemy anti-tank weapons.

“As for the T-72B tanks, they have dynamic protection that can neutralize cumulative ammunition. In addition, these combat vehicles are capable of using guided weapons, ”the author notes.

The number of BMP-2, which are in service with government forces, is also very small. Machines have proven themselves in battles and are highly valued by the Syrian soldiers.

Comments

[sever.56]

http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2015/566/scwn886.png

[hedgehog in the fog]

in a good way, the technique will fall into the right hands

[vovanpain]

Need help, without technology Syrians will be hard

[avt]

Quote: vovanpain

Need help, without technology Syrians will be hard

That's just how much it, or rather, in what time frame, will be dragged by an old BDK ???

Quote: Frigate

But the problem is not only in tanks, but also in crews. Preparing a crew is more difficult than buying a tank.

Quote: RUSIVAN

Riyans are already familiar with this technique, there will be no problems, and if something, ours will help to figure it out ..

The already familiar 72s and "two" are going to chase the campaign for the Assad guard.

[lelikas]

775th pr. - 13 pieces take, although, in our place - would have long ago "brought" into the fleet a normal dry cargo ship or what more abruptly from among civilians, and then "brought" back.

[atalef]

Quote: lelikas

775th pr. - 13 pieces take, although, in our place - would have long ago "brought" into the fleet a normal dry cargo ship or what more abruptly from among civilians, and then "brought" back.

The problem is that Turkey has the right to inspect civilian vessels when passing the Bosphorus.
those. the ship must be uniquely military.
As I understand it.

[bulvas]

Quote: atalef

The problem is that Turkey has the right to inspect civilian vessels when passing the Bosphorus.
those. the ship must be uniquely military.
As I understand it.

Only not the Black Sea countries

[tolian]

Apparently wrong. Straits passed. Reported for cargo to the Turks.

[nail1972]

Today there was a message about the inclusion in the Black Sea Fleet of transport ships (from 3 to 8 pcs. According to various sources), purchased from Turkey. It is planned that they will be listed as an auxiliary fleet, and fly under the Andreevsky flag. And no one has the right to inspect warships.

[lelikas]

Quote: atalef

The problem is that Turkey has the right to inspect civilian vessels when passing the Bosphorus.
those. the ship must be uniquely military.
As I understand it.

Everything is correct; therefore, it must be included in the fleet.

[Rusich is not from Kiev]

Quote: lelikas

Everything is correct; therefore, it must be included in the fleet.

So maybe they have already entered, how much do we know.

[Maxom75]

There are no problems, the bulk carrier will be transferred to the Navy and then it will be a military one.

[Lord of the Sith]

Quote: atalef

The problem is that Turkey has the right to inspect civilian vessels when passing the Bosphorus.
those. the ship must be uniquely military.
As I understand it.

Yes, but still not in the military convoy.

[abrakadabre]

This is precisely what the bulk carrier enters into the Navy. With the raising of the naval flag, painting the hull in a military color, installing a pair of artillery turrets.

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: atalef

The problem is that Turkey has the right to inspect civilian vessels when passing the Bosphorus.
those. the ship must be uniquely military.

Yes, it’s not a question of Sanya, you officially enter the civilian cargo ship into the Navy, you hang up the pennant of the Navy and go.

[tolian]

Most likely so!

[Michael-rl]

http://bmpd.livejournal.com/1523279.html

[atalef]

Quote: lelikas

775th pr. - 13 pieces take, although, in our place - would have long ago "brought" into the fleet a normal dry cargo ship or what more abruptly from among civilians, and then "brought" back.

The problem is that Turkey has the right to inspect civilian vessels when passing the Bosphorus.
those. the ship must be uniquely military.
As I understand it.

[APASUS]

Quote: atalef

The problem is that Turkey has the right to inspect civilian vessels during the passage of the Bosphorus, i.e. the ship must be uniquely military.

Turks flagrantly violate the Montreux Convention, arrogating to themselves the right to search foreign ships.

For example, in 1997, the Republic of Cyprus wished to purchase the S-300 anti-aircraft missile system in the Russian Federation, which in those years was a completely routine matter. Both the Russians sold the S-300, and the Americans supplied their similar Patriot system to dozens of countries, including the Mediterranean. But here the Turkish government said that it would seize by force ships carrying the S-300 to Cyprus, and even carried out an illegal search in the straits of several ships flying the flags of Ukraine, Egypt, Ecuador and Equatorial Guinea.

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: lelikas

although, in the place of ours, I would have long ago "introduced" a normal dry cargo ship or what is more abruptly from among the civilians into the fleet, and then "brought" back.

Already entered one.

[Nick]

Quote: lelikas

775th pr. - 13 pieces take, although, in our place - would have long ago "brought" into the fleet a normal dry cargo ship or what more abruptly from among civilians, and then "brought" back.

MO can just charter

[GRAY]

Quote: avt

That's just how much it, or rather, in what time frame, will be dragged by an old BDK ???

"Alexander Tkachenko" can be attached to the case.

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: GRAY

"Alexander Tkachenko" can be attached to the case.

He is already at work. Here he is passing the Bosphorus

[Manul]

Quote: avt

That's just how much it, or rather, in what time frame, will be dragged by an old BDK ???

Can't we rent the Mistral from Egypt? So for 30 years ..

[avt]

Quote: Manul

Can't we rent the Mistral from Egypt? So for 30 years ..

We’ll wait and see, but the authorities have already cried out - God forbid we are resold.

Quote: GRAY

"Alexander Tkachenko" can be attached to the case.

Quote: atalef

The problem is that Turkey has the right to inspect civilian vessels when passing the Bosphorus.
those. the ship must be uniquely military.

Something like this, of course, as military transport could be stocked, but not from Novorossiysk for sure.

[GRAY]

Quote: avt

Something like this, of course, as military transport could be stocked, but not from Novorossiysk for sure.

"Alexander" has already been driven to Syria, with accompaniment of course.

[lelikas]

In the order of delirium - "Sevmorput" - Everything will fit there - both tanks and infantry fighting vehicles with armored personnel carriers;)
It is clear that no one will do this, but I would love to look at him in a ball.

[Alexey RA]

Quote: lelikas

In the order of delirium - "Sevmorput" - Everything will fit there - both tanks and infantry fighting vehicles with armored personnel carriers;)

And what a good option.
"If you interfere with the delivery of equipment to Syria on civilian ships, we will transfer the "SMP" to the Black Sea and we will pass through the straits 4 times a month. Nuclear reactor through the center of Istanbul - there ... here ... there ... here ...".

[kamikaze]

in Syria would put the sunshine Pinocchio would still be fine

[kamikaze]

this car on bearded men igil will fry their beards

[Vadim237]

Sunshine and Pinocchio are useless against quickly maneuvering small enemy groups in jeeps and in underground shelters and tunnels.

[Sivan]

Quote: Vadim237

Sunshine and Pinocchio are useless against quickly maneuvering small enemy groups in jeeps and in underground shelters and tunnels.

Just in all tunnels and burrows, the thermobar works well, because gas is spreading. Or is it a delusion?
For example, in Jobar there were no civilians at all, only militants moving through tunnels.

[Gogia]

At the expense of underground shelters in vain. Just the very thing. There is no oxygen left and the pressure drops a lot in the area of ​​the rupture of the ammunition.

[Manul]

Quote: avt

We’ll wait and see, but the authorities have already cried out - God forbid we are resold.

That's just the point - for sure there is a clause on the non-resale of Russia in the contract with Egypt. And suddenly they forgot to say about the lease ..
And why did you close up the cons, for the post I quote? I didn’t see anything terrible. Maybe it will fly to me now.

[Omskgasmyas]

The flotilla of used dry cargo ships is being purchased - 8 pcs. Photos of the first have already been online. Introduced into the auxiliary fleet of the Russian Navy and raised the flag. It is on them that the "Syrian Express" will be held. And the BDK will rest for the time being or will carry important cargo.

[Pavel Vereshchagin]

I agree that the Syrians need technology, without it it is difficult to defeat the thugs, but the stench from the American "partners" will be enough. Although we have a crush on it.

[vovanpain]

Quote: Pavel Vereshchagin

I agree that the Syrians need technology, without it it is difficult to defeat the thugs, but the stench from the American "partners" will be enough. Although we have a crush on it.

Yes, stink from them, and so won’t take so long, so what? The mongrels bark our caravan.

[prosto_rgb]

Quote: vovanpain

Need help, without technology Syrians will be hard

Of course it is.
Just one question.
Where are the active protection systems?

[lelikas]

Quote: prosto_rgb

Where are the active protection systems?

As they say, not for us, in Odessa - but where do we have active protection systems? The only car where it is nominally provided is the very one, Armata ....

[Semen Semyonitch]

Quote: vovanpain

Need help, without technology Syrians will be hard

Who would have thought?

[NEXUS]

Quote: hedgehog in the fog

in a good way, the technique will fall into the right hands

Tornadoes must also be sent to Alligators with the Night Hunters. And we’ll run around the technique and make an extra crap with the Ishilians.

[Tor5]

A very smart and specific solution! And let the mattress drop "moderately at 50 tons.
any g ... a.

[Michael easily]

Such "veiled" coordination - where the "load", there and "pour")

[abrakadabre]

And in response to make an official thank you for such a designation. Depicting in all seriousness.

[Air Force captain]

Lord help them ... in the battle with the forces of evil in your name, accept the souls of the fallen and innocently killed in your kingdom of heaven, for You do not know the difference in the children of men, but judge them by their actions. Amen

[ASK505]

Hope for God, but do not make it yourself.

[marlin1203]

Good technology, good people!

[Maxom75]

So began the Russian Langlis to Syria. In exchange, it is necessary to demand an air force base, navy and shelf in extraterritorial control (i.e. for 250 years in the ownership of Russia, then we will return it).)))

[nail1972]

Soon we will have a rest on the beaches in Syria?

[Lord of the Sith]

Finally, we are constantly discussing with friends why they still haven’t sent a batch of T-72s.

[Serg 122]

... Let them ask Petra Porazhenko for advice ...

This one will advise ...

[kamikaze]

with such a machine you can turn the hell out of igil

[Oleg552]

Do not believe those who say that quitting smoking in a week is impossible. There is a special and really working technique that will save you from this addiction in a few days, here https://dmitrinosov.blogspot.ru link Itself could not quit for a very long time, but this time it really happened.

[DMoroz]

It is necessary to supply them with ground weapons, during the battles it really is not enough

[Frigate]

But the problem is not only in tanks, but also in crews. Preparing a crew is more difficult than buying a tank.

[RUSIVAN]

The Syrians are already familiar with this technique, there will be no problems, and if something, ours will help to figure it out ...

[RUSIVAN]

This is very good, the Syrians really need technology.

[venaya]

Quote: RUSIVAN

This is very good, the Syrians really need technology.

Finally, the real use of our military equipment. No wonder people worked, and now come in handy.

[made13]

Correctly. Let Russian technology recall its effectiveness. Sales will grow and the image of the country too

[IAlex]

She is not there yet ???

[kil 31]

It seems that the BDK is loading 10 tanks. They need a lot, so you need to think about what other ships to supply them.

[IAlex]

Well, in order to think of supplies, it took 4 years, you see after another four years you’ll guess how to put all this ...

[mQn]

I think this is from the reserves of canned food .....

[Engineer]

What trash is this ?! !!!! Where is the normal technique? Where is the T-90SM? Where is the BMP-3?

[BLACK-SHARK-64]

do not rush bro everything in due time ...

[Dyatko Nebatko]

What they can use, they will receive it! I think that for free, because. in difficult times you need to help unselfishly!
And the new ones will come in handy.

[Engineer]

The whole site laughed at the Saxons and Hamers decommissioned for Ukraine, while they themselves do the same with Syria and everyone is silent. That is what tanks mean are waiting for 500 anti-tank American complexes of the Tou Syrian opposition.

[Wedmak]

Well, it’s as if we were not written off. And probably from the warehouses. Again, cars are not tanks.

[Alexey RA]

Quote: Engineer

The whole site laughed at the Saxons and Hamers decommissioned for Ukraine, while they themselves do the same with Syria and everyone is silent.

And when did we manage to write off the T-72B and BMP-2?
Or do you think that our entire army has already been rearmament on the T-72B3 and BMP-3? There is none - the legacy of the USSR is still in order. Here is the news from 25.08.2015/XNUMX/XNUMX:

An active phase has begun at the training ground of the Tsugol Eastern Military District during the joint Russian-Mongolian military training Selenga-2015, the press service of the Eastern Military District said.

On Tuesday, August 25, the combined force grouping involved in the maneuvers completed the crossing of the Onon River section.

During the practical phase of the training, the crews T-72B tanks, BMP-2 infantry fighting vehicles, armored personnel carriers BTR-80 crossed the water section of the river with a depth of about two and a half and a width of about 120 meters.

So the Syrians will fight on the same technique that our fighters serve on.

[star44]

... During the practical stage of the training, the crews of T-72B tanks, BMP-2 infantry fighting vehicles, BTR-80 armored personnel carriers overcame ...
More like a combat coordination of crews before a long business trip ... As in an old joke: "... Well, boy, move over, now we'll show them ..." But seriously - now the Syrians are not up to retraining for new equipment. It is necessary to free their land while the Russians help. There is not much time left ...

[Eugene-Eugene]

In any case, this is better than T-55, which can only be seen on fotovideo

[Alexey RA]

Quote: Engineer

What trash is this ?! !!!! Where is the normal technique? Where is the T-90SM? Where is the BMP-3?

Where in Syria are trained crews for all this?
In addition, against the background of what Assad’s forces are fighting in Syria, the T-72B and BMP-2 are new.

[provincial]

This must still be bought.

[Lex69Rus]

I think ours are afraid that they will destroy the Syrians with the latest technology. IMHO Assad troops are fighting disgustingly and such hands and Abrams burn well. What kind of tactics is it is to drive several tanks into the city without infantry and to naughty in all directions, while the militants calmly use this equipment from the tanks. It would be better, of course, to put the T-72b3, although they are again afraid of losses. I think these t72b are also modernized. Replacing the contact with contact 5 is easy to think.

[Wedmak]

Here is the time to deliver the B3 version. This is generally an economical version of B2. Compare the protection and understand everything.

[lopvlad]

Where is the T-90SM? Where is the BMP-3?

then to learn how to use it for six months?

[sharp-lad]

The reality is that training will really take up too much precious time, and the old, but combat-ready equipment, familiar to the Syrian fighters, will now be the best help!

[Awaz]

that is, Ukrainians still did not destroy all the stocks of armored vehicles)))) Although yes, the equipment does not seem to be ice. But for Syria it should do. Junk crews are easier to collect. Although a few new ones should be rolled away

[northern]

And Ukrainians here what side? Appliances from the Russian Federation, throw substances.

[Awaz]

well how. We read the censor, everything is written there. All tanks, all the way to Almaty are burned ...

[northern]

well, here you are, sorry for hitting then.
I just don’t go to garbage dumps, I'm afraid I’ll start puke on the monitor.

[WE ARE MAKING]

Friends must have! Friends need help!

[northern]

No need to have friends, we are not US.
Friends must be protected.

[TIO1969]

To solve the current challenges in Syria, these models of equipment are optimal. Do not use a microscope to chop nuts. And another important point, the readiness of the Syrian army to exploit precisely this technique. Indeed, the equipment itself without crews costs nothing!

[ikshacooper]

Quote: Engineer

What trash is this ?! !!!! Where is the normal technique? Where is the T-90SM? Where is the BMP-3?

Maybe even "Armata" with "Kurgan"?))) BMP-2 and T-72B are quite enough for the Syrian army, given the level of armament of IS militants, especially free of charge!

[Engineer]

Why not the T-34 then? That the Syrian army is not worthy of modern technology? Or do you think they are such savages that they can only fight on used technology 30 years ago?

[lelikas]

Quote: Engineer

Why not the T-34 then? That the Syrian army is not worthy of modern technology? Or do you think they are such savages that they can only fight on used technology 30 years ago?

Really ready to pay for them out of your pocket? Only honestly, discarding all reservations?

[Alexey RA]

Quote: Engineer

Why not the T-34 then? That the Syrian army is not worthy of modern technology? Or do you think they are such savages that they can only fight on used technology 30 years ago?

Syria did not previously have a BMP-3 or T-90. That is, there are no trained crews, no maintenance and repair specialists, no spare parts, no combat use experience (the same BMP-3, seduced by its 100th gun, can begin to be used as a light tank with predictable consequences).
And most importantly - Syria now has no time for training. Technique is needed at the front, and this technique must be familiar.

[Seryoga DV]

I'm wondering:
72nd always went for export without a conveyor, while our conveyors stood at all
Will these be with conveyors?
on the assembly line, I think it’s not difficult to relearn

[Setrac]

Quote: Engineer

Why not the T-34 then? That the Syrian army is not worthy of modern technology? Or do you think they are such savages that they can only fight on used technology 30 years ago?

,, Do not savages ,, let themselves produce armored vehicles

[rc56]

Quote: Engineer

Why not the T-34 then? That the Syrian army is not worthy of modern technology? Or do you think they are such savages that they can only fight on used technology 30 years ago?

T-34-85 all went to the same Syria in the summer of 1982.

He himself saw how they removed from the URs and drove under their own power from Barabash to Slavyanka for loading. For an hour, on the side of the road with his auto club, he was sunbathing while the columns passed one after another.

And these 34s were sent not out of greed, but precisely because of the speed of crew training. As they say, 72 then proved to be very good there. Only the crews were on them - all our "instructors".
.

[Wedmak]

On the right side of the tank, on the cover of the infrared "headlight" such a cute skull is drawn. Not according to the charter somehow, isn't it? ))) And the BDK stands in the background. Taki "Syrian Express" expects an increase in the intensity of the walk.

[northern]

Maybe the factory workers have fun, people too.

[demo]

The Syrian army may soon receive the long-awaited Russian armored vehicles - T-72 and BMP-2, at least the accumulation of such equipment “in the characteristic Syrian camouflage” was recorded in one of the southern ports of Russia, the Vestnik Mordoviya agency writes.

The humble Messenger of Mordovia did not name the glorious hero city of Novorossiysk.
Syrians cool help.

[Krsk]

Ice is not ice but Surprise can arrange full-format

[VNP1958PVN]

The ISIS will strongly regret that they are going to take the Russian Caucasus!

[chunga-changa]

And at whose expense is all this banquet? What and how does Assad give us?

[Dyatko Nebatko]

Do not carry the blizzard! In difficult times they help unselfishly !!!

[Saratoga833]

Quote: Dyatko Nebatko

In difficult times they help unselfishly !!!

During the Second World War, the Americans did not help us unselfishly, but they are still proud that they defeated Nazi Germany by "common efforts". And about the fact that after the war we, with a destroyed economy, paid for this aid - they keep quiet!

[lelikas]

Quote: Saratoga833

During the Second World War, the Americans did not help us unselfishly, but they are still proud that they defeated Nazi Germany by "common efforts". And about the fact that after the war we, with a destroyed economy, paid for this aid - they keep quiet!

For the sake of justice - the equipment supplied by the Americans according to lend-lease - was free, as well as lost in the battles, the one that was left to itself after the war - was payable - they paid for it. The British are another matter - they managed to sell us their equipment, receiving in return American.

[chunga-changa]

In difficult times they help unselfishly !!!

Selflessly, this means without profit - at cost. What you mean is called - for free. At whose expense is it free? Who helped us in hard times for free?

[abrakadabre]

As Citizen Woland used to say at Bulgakov: “fish can only be of the first freshness, it is also the last. The second freshness means rotten.” So it is with your games about free and selfless help.

[Garris199]

Do not have a hundred rubles, but have a hundred friends (s). And a full-fledged, powerful base (with a penny rent or without it at all) in the Mediterranean region. Then we have these tanks (T-72b) in storage, at least ass. Chew, a few thousand for sure. But we haven’t riveted them for beauty, after all, right?

[Wedmak]

We'll go there on vacation at discounts when it's over. But seriously, what is the tovarischsch score ?? There bearded men with Kalash run around, cut people's throats. Another half a year, a year, and they will come to our Caucasus. And America will give them money and plant weapons. What will you say then? "Why didn't we help Assad then?"

[northern]

It will whine, like all other liberals that Putin has completely lost.

[rc56]

Quote: chunga-changa

And at whose expense is all this banquet? What and how does Assad give us?

The cradle of his army, which must grind bandyuk before they get to the UK and the SA.

[Starik72]

This is the thing! And then the Shtatovites can be helped by scum-cutters, but that we can’t help Bashar Assad! It is necessary to deliver the equipment to the Syrians, but faster! Our air strikes are excellent, but mother’s fellow countryman also needs to be cleaned from these thugs-thugs, here tanks and armored personnel carriers come in handy, and other equipment will not hurt!

[Algetxnumx]

Everything is correct and understandable, we will help, we will help and help, but all the time there is one question that is waiting for so long, why it was allowed to bring such a situation, but there is no explanation for this question from anyone, nor from our government, nor from any kind of analysts, complete silence, but I would like to hear an intelligible answer.

[dsi]

but I would like to hear an intelligible answer.

Are you in Russia or where. Take a look around, just figured out Georgia, Donbass was blazing at its side, again Crimea. We have just begun to declare ourselves as a worthy power, and you are such requirements. Therefore, analysts are silent because they see no reason to explain the obvious ...

[Seryoga DV]

purely my opinion, they simply were not ready: everything themselves hung in the balance (a real war with NATO could begin over Crimea) and everything was more complicated with China. In addition, apparently, there was hope that after solving the problem of Obama’s red dashes, government forces would cope with the opposition themselves, and ISIS is a fairly recent Western invention.
the crisis with Ukraine was (and remains) a pretty serious thing, since they began to rattle with nuclear weapons.
perhaps it was important to solve the Iranian problem - my everyday foreboding of the war there was very strong

[Bronik]

The very case when presenting is cheaper for us. Around the pluses.

[ASK505]

Tell the enemy what you still saw there. Chatterbox is a godsend for the enemy.

[northern]

Are you talking about all the movements of military equipment in open sources?

[starriuy]

I think they will quickly throw ....

[starriuy]

How many flights

[Victorio]

why put such things?

[kizhe]

Still to slow down the supply of US weapons and then generally ice.

[Mera joota]

"Business in Russian - the alcohol was sold, the money was spent on drink." will recruit new ones?

[Setrac]

Crews gained experience in the battles, while experienced crews won on any equipment.

[gukoyan]

That's great!
Just the guys are now on the offensive, and fresh tank injections will give their plus in the offensive and on the defensive.

[starriuy]

Just this year to Syria

[starriuy]

And the very beginning

[katalonec2014]

Definitely good news, the equipment of the devastated country is just as needed, the Syrians will be grateful, since this is real help, consider humanitarian aid.

[LAB1959]

The question of the type of tanks should be considered from the angle of training of Syrian tankers and targets. Since there is no need to fight the Abrams, the T-72 is quite suitable, since the gun from the T-90 is the same and the tank is familiar to the Syrians. But why ours do not put the automatic defense system "Arena" (if I am not mistaken in the name), that is another question. And we will pump the system into a combat situation and save people. But it is not clear why the Terminator fire support vehicles will not be sent, this is not at all clear. In addition, it does not interfere with sending the "Nona", maybe the "Vienna", it is not clear where are the new self-propelled guns based on a 120mm mortar? It is not clear why not throw in new silent 12,7mm snipers, just for urban battles - on the walls in half a brick is something. A warrior for experience in applying and testing armor resistance, even without communication systems, and that will be good. It is necessary to test all new equipment in battle, remember Spain, where both the I-16 and the T-26 gave experience for the creation of new aircraft and tanks. And in terms of the cost of tanks, we can say that the more we give the old T-72 models, the more we will be able to update our tank fleet and reserves.
Speaking of fees, keeping a fleet at sea is expensive at three, and after the Libyan and Yugoslav ports were lost, this was a guard at all.

[Saratoga833]

The Syrians need to fight here and now, and they will only be happy with the supplied weapons, especially since the equipment is familiar.

[Mama_Cholli]

If lane-throwers throw ammunition from their planes to Ishilov’s aircraft, then why not help the Syrian army with the necessary machines?

[BOB044]

A reasonable decision, it is necessary to strengthen those countries where our military bases will be.

[padded jacket]

A very wise decision has long said it is necessary to arm Syria, Iraq, Hezbollah and Iran to help advisers and technical experts and let them destroy the terrorists.

[Goldmitro]

Quote: chunga-changa

And at whose expense is all this banquet? What and how does Assad give us?

He gives the lives of Syrian soldiers who have been grinding all jihadist scum from all over the world for 4 years in Syria, including from our republics of the Caucasus, where they can return if ISIS triumphs!

[Ustyuzhanin-35]

Technology is ours, soldiers are yours. The only way!

[starriuy]

And here is more significant news. In Murmansk the other day, hastily curtailed, lasting only four months - unimaginably small for such a huge ship! - repair of our only aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov. Next week, he will already embark on the Severomorsk raid, at the end of October he will receive the aircraft of the 279th separate naval fighter regiment of the Northern Fleet. And then it will go to the Barents Sea to provide training flights.

The rush for our naval reality is simply unimaginable. After all, usually even ships of much smaller sizes and combat capabilities, after being repaired for months, have been in bases. Replenish supplies and conduct naval exercises. Checkers of all ranks do not come off their decks. Of the crews, the headquarters of the rope twist, establishing a combat organization. Then - gradual completion of course tasks.

And then from the factory wall - and immediately to the sea? This happens only in urgent circumstances.
Information from the Rusnext site ...

[starriuy]

What is it for ?....

[Izotovp]

We need self-propelled guns, mortars and RPO.

[ASK505]

Make a complete list of the necessary weapons for Syria and run to the General Staff.

[Izotovp]

This is a thought !! Only to run far away, it is easier for a classmate to write there)))

[Dima Čalevo]

It is high time, in Russia this good in bulk in storage, and will help the Syrians. In the last video, from there the tanks are completely T-62 and T-55 lined with sandbags, well, this tin is already completely ..

[nazar_0753]

Nice to see the Novorossiysk Mountains in the background

[TOR2]

As for the T-72B tanks, they have dynamic protection, which is able to neutralize the cumulative ammunition.

There, in addition to dynamic protection, the campaign will soon need the "Shtora".

[Sasha75]

Well, so for reference. T 34-85 in Syria, they are fighting two, they just fought off the attack at the air base, they were helped by the SU-100 model 1944. The ammunition was small, so they shot it and abandoned it, and their fate is not known. And who is so sure that they are only fighting with new weapons, they show us combat-ready units and there’s one old thing, yes it’s all the best that’s left and T55 is what’s left and there’s need some kind of equipment, if we throw off all our old stuff there for disposal accumulated and will be happy about it. Already slipping Mosin rifles in a sniper version. And so there they fight for both old and proven and cheap weapons on both sides, and a few videos about the use of anti-tank systems are PR people who don’t remember, I remind the Americans how many tens of thousands of greens in Afghanistan were bought by unused Stingers, we will soon see a replay buy all that thrown if they sell back.
Add a photo than they are fighting.

[the47th]

Mosinka is now quite sold in stores. She is still far from "old".

[Sasha75]

Who did not understand Degtyarev.

[Sasha75]

Also not new.

[Dima Čalevo]

And what's that? czech bran

[just exp]

but Czech? not aglitsky?

[Sasha75]

And this place at the auction will be very expensive.

[Sasha75]

Although there it is not a rarity.

[Sasha75]

Not Syria, but in those parts.

[Sasha75]

Not Syria, but in those parts ..

[vkfriendly]

with what fright, the Syrian flag in the distance

[Sasha75]

Not Syria, but in those parts ...

[voyaka uh]

T-72 tanks are suitable for Syrians. They are used to them.
But will there be enough competent tankers? Almost all tankers are Alawites.
They are loyal to the president, but recruits are often peasants - teach them
technology is not fast.

[stonks]

The same first thought: "And the crews ???"

[sharp-lad]

But still, the T72B is not the T90 in the latest versions, in addition, there are still enough Syrian tankers able to train new crews.

[Astrahanec]

There was a conversation about Cuban tankers. Maybe not a duck?

[GDV]

And more bumblebees and bumblebees ... a lot of bumblebees, back oil.

[Awaz]

like now Bumblebees do not wear honey but oil))))

[Awaz]

Arabs are writing about Turkish tanks in Syria ... They ate something there ... they and the Turks lost rams altogether. They provoke a really serious conflict. What climb (if true) in the area where the Russian Aerospace Forces are bandaged.

[Yak-3P]

and now what should I think??? Mosk explosion....and if we also supply LDPR equipment??? The guys there will study the T-90 in a week... and by the way... for any of our tanks, with a normal instructor, people can study for a maximum of a week at the T-72 base

[ilyaches]

The main thing is to quickly deliver the equipment, unload it, equip it and go into battle.

[xin-l]

Lately we have a lot of people studying not only from the Middle East but also from Africa and Latin America. Perhaps these are the skills that are learned.

[Toyvo]

Quote: Rusich not from Kiev

Quote: avt

Erdogan was made an offer that he could not refuse.

For example, do not bomb ISIS oil fields. Türkiye with cheap oil, Syria with cargo.

Why aren't oil fields bombed?

[samara-58]

...and relief for the taiga!

[pensioneree]

My sister...ts (brother-in-law?) was on a ship that was arrested somewhere, either Tunisia or Kh.Z. He cooks a snack for the team, and next to him is He..r with a Kalash, but the team NEEDS to be fed! He took out a bottle of “whiskey”: “Are you a bush?” (I could take a 1 mug of a slurry and eat it with a kiln0,75) He looked sadly out the window, then drew the curtain, but now ALLAH doesn’t see! True or not, I believe him!

[rc56]

Quote: pensioneree

He took out a bottle of “whiskey”: “Are you a bush?” (I could take a 1 mug of a slurry and eat it with a kiln0,75) He looked sadly out the window, then drew the curtain, but now ALLAH doesn’t see! True or not, I believe him!

Do not believe! The Prophet wrote that wine is prohibited. And there is nothing written in the Koran for vodka, cognac and whiskey!!!
Looks like it's quite dark - the one with the machine gun...

[Black Colonel]

A little off topic, but interesting:
Su-30 fighters, which Russia supplied to Iraq, are already striking positions of Islamic State militants, Iraqi media report, citing the press center of the Iraqi army Media War Cell (MWC).

According to MWC, “a Sukhoi fighter destroyed three militant hideouts in Salaheddin province and their convoy, which was heading to the city of Mosul.”

The message is accompanied by a photograph of a Su-30 fighter with Iraqi markings.

Information that the Iraqi Air Force received Su-30 fighters was announced for the first time.

Representatives of Russian competent structures avoid commenting on the range of Russian supplies to Iraq through military-technical cooperation (MTC). However, the country’s Ministry of Defense regularly displays military equipment and weapons supplied from Russia on its website.

It was reported that due to the difficult situation in Iraq, Moscow urgently supplied Baghdad with Su-25 attack aircraft, Mi-28NE and Mi-35 helicopters, TOS-1A Solntsepek heavy flamethrower systems, and Pantsir- S1″, man-portable anti-aircraft missile systems “Dzhigit”, artillery systems and ammunition for them, armored mine clearing vehicles BRM-3M “Vepr”.

As Russian Presidential Assistant Vladimir Kozhin previously stated, Russia will continue military-technical cooperation with Iraq. “Basically these are small arms, these are armored vehicles, these are aviation equipment,” he said. The volume of supplies, according to Kozhin, is hundreds of millions of dollars.
http://warfiles.ru/show-97699-istrebiteli-su-30-nachali-nanosit-udary-po-poziciy
am-ig-v-irake.html

[Loversodrar]

Hello everyone friends! While I work at Tinkoff Bank, ordering a card for me and, accordingly, for friends comes with bonus interest; if you need a card without bank interest, but with bonuses, follow the link, order the card directly to your home and receive bonuses on your card.
http://vk.cc/4dqXYZ

[Clintona]

Hello! Here play games for 2 players fire and water all parts. Original here: http://actual-game.ru/page/%D0%B8%D0%B3%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%8C_%D0%B2_%D0%B3%D0
%BE%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B8_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%B4%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B8%D1%85_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%
D0%BC%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%85_%D0%B1%D0%B5%D1%81%D
0%BF%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%BE/

[Silman1985]

If only the equipment reaches its destination. And it did not bring death to civilians. Although later, all the same, the “Americans” and other “MEMBERS” will blame Russia for helping ISIS, not the Syrians (((

[vnord]

Quote: nail1972

Soon we will have a rest on the beaches in Syria?

In sandy camouflage.