Military Review

Media: preparing to send to Syria the party of Russian T-72 and BMP-2

152
The Syrian army may soon receive the long-awaited Russian armored vehicles - T-72 and BMP-2, at least the accumulation of such equipment "in characteristic Syrian camouflage" was recorded in one of the southern ports of Russia, the agency writes Messenger of Mordovia.


Media: preparing to send to Syria the party of Russian T-72 and BMP-2


During the war years, the Syrian army suffered heavy losses in tanks and other armored vehicles. Now, in the context of the unfolding offensive against the positions of the Islamists, the Syrians are forced to fight on old and vulnerable to enemy anti-tank weapons.

“As for the T-72B tanks, they have dynamic protection that can neutralize cumulative ammunition. In addition, these combat vehicles are capable of using guided weapons, ”the author notes.

The number of BMP-2, which are in service with government forces, is also very small. Machines have proven themselves in battles and are highly valued by the Syrian soldiers.

Photos used:
http://otvaga2004.mybb.ru/
152 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. sever.56
    sever.56 14 October 2015 13: 09 New
    62
    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2015/566/scwn886.png
    1. hedgehog in the fog
      hedgehog in the fog 14 October 2015 13: 10 New
      43
      in a good way, the technique will fall into the right hands soldier
      1. vovanpain
        vovanpain 14 October 2015 13: 13 New
        32
        Need help, without technology Syrians will be hard
        1. avt
          avt 14 October 2015 13: 18 New
          12
          Quote: vovanpain
          Need help, without technology Syrians will be hard

          request That's just how much it, or rather, in what time frame, will be dragged by an old BDK ???
          Quote: Frigate
          But the problem is not only in tanks, but also in crews. Preparing a crew is more difficult than buying a tank.

          Quote: RUSIVAN
          Riyans are already familiar with this technique, there will be no problems, and if something, ours will help to figure it out ..

          good Гнать то собираются уже привычные 72е и ,,двойки"Походу для асадовской гвардии .
          1. lelikas
            lelikas 14 October 2015 13: 42 New
            26
            775 й пр. - 13 штук берет , хотя , на месте наших - давно бы "ввел" в состав флота нормальный сухогруз или что покруче из числа гражданских , а потом "вывел" обратно .
            1. atalef
              atalef 14 October 2015 13: 48 New
              20
              Quote: lelikas
              775 й пр. - 13 штук берет , хотя , на месте наших - давно бы "ввел" в состав флота нормальный сухогруз или что покруче из числа гражданских , а потом "вывел" обратно .

              The problem is that Turkey has the right to inspect civilian vessels when passing the Bosphorus.
              those. the ship must be uniquely military.
              As I understand it.
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. bulvas
                bulvas 14 October 2015 14: 13 New
                15
                Quote: atalef

                The problem is that Turkey has the right to inspect civilian vessels when passing the Bosphorus.
                those. the ship must be uniquely military.
                As I understand it.


                Only not the Black Sea countries

                1. tolian
                  tolian 15 October 2015 10: 59 New
                  +3
                  Apparently wrong. Straits passed. Reported for cargo to the Turks.
                2. nail1972
                  nail1972 15 October 2015 15: 36 New
                  10
                  Today there was a message about the inclusion in the Black Sea Fleet of transport ships (from 3 to 8 pcs. According to various sources), purchased from Turkey. It is planned that they will be listed as an auxiliary fleet, and fly under the Andreevsky flag. And no one has the right to inspect warships.
              3. lelikas
                lelikas 14 October 2015 14: 40 New
                +7
                Quote: atalef
                The problem is that Turkey has the right to inspect civilian vessels when passing the Bosphorus.
                those. the ship must be uniquely military.
                As I understand it.

                Everything is correct; therefore, it must be included in the fleet.
                1. Rusich is not from Kiev
                  Rusich is not from Kiev 15 October 2015 01: 28 New
                  +4
                  Quote: lelikas
                  Everything is correct; therefore, it must be included in the fleet.

                  So maybe they have already entered, how much do we know.
              4. Maxom75
                Maxom75 14 October 2015 14: 53 New
                +6
                There are no problems, the bulk carrier will be transferred to the Navy and then it will be a military one.
              5. Lord of the Sith
                Lord of the Sith 14 October 2015 15: 26 New
                +8
                Quote: atalef
                The problem is that Turkey has the right to inspect civilian vessels when passing the Bosphorus.
                those. the ship must be uniquely military.
                As I understand it.

                Yes, but still not in the military convoy.
              6. abrakadabre
                abrakadabre 14 October 2015 15: 53 New
                +8
                This is precisely what the bulk carrier enters into the Navy. With the raising of the naval flag, painting the hull in a military color, installing a pair of artillery turrets.
              7. Alexander Romanov
                Alexander Romanov 14 October 2015 15: 55 New
                +6
                Quote: atalef
                The problem is that Turkey has the right to inspect civilian vessels when passing the Bosphorus.
                those. the ship must be uniquely military.

                Yes, it’s not a question of Sanya, you officially enter the civilian cargo ship into the Navy, you hang up the pennant of the Navy and go.
              8. tolian
                tolian 15 October 2015 10: 58 New
                +1
                Most likely so!
              9. Michael-rl
                Michael-rl 17 October 2015 03: 05 New
                0
                http://bmpd.livejournal.com/1523279.html
            2. atalef
              atalef 14 October 2015 13: 48 New
              -3
              Quote: lelikas
              775 й пр. - 13 штук берет , хотя , на месте наших - давно бы "ввел" в состав флота нормальный сухогруз или что покруче из числа гражданских , а потом "вывел" обратно .

              The problem is that Turkey has the right to inspect civilian vessels when passing the Bosphorus.
              those. the ship must be uniquely military.
              As I understand it.
              1. APASUS
                APASUS 14 October 2015 19: 29 New
                +3
                Quote: atalef
                The problem is that Turkey has the right to inspect civilian vessels during the passage of the Bosphorus, i.e. the ship must be uniquely military.

                Turks flagrantly violate the Montreux Convention, arrogating to themselves the right to search foreign ships.
                For example, in 1997, the Republic of Cyprus wished to purchase the S-300 anti-aircraft missile system in the Russian Federation, which in those years was a completely routine matter. Both the Russians sold the S-300, and the Americans supplied their similar Patriot system to dozens of countries, including the Mediterranean. But here the Turkish government said that it would seize by force ships carrying the S-300 to Cyprus, and even carried out an illegal search in the straits of several ships flying the flags of Ukraine, Egypt, Ecuador and Equatorial Guinea.
            3. Alexander Romanov
              Alexander Romanov 14 October 2015 15: 54 New
              +3
              Quote: lelikas
              хотя , на месте наших - давно бы "ввел" в состав флота нормальный сухогруз или что покруче из числа гражданских , а потом "вывел" обратно .

              Already entered one.
            4. Nick
              Nick 17 October 2015 09: 20 New
              0
              Quote: lelikas
              775 й пр. - 13 штук берет , хотя , на месте наших - давно бы "ввел" в состав флота нормальный сухогруз или что покруче из числа гражданских , а потом "вывел" обратно .

              MO can just charter
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. GRAY
            GRAY 14 October 2015 13: 52 New
            +9
            Quote: avt
            That's just how much it, or rather, in what time frame, will be dragged by an old BDK ???

            "Александра Ткаченко" можно к делу приставить.
            1. Alexander Romanov
              Alexander Romanov 14 October 2015 15: 59 New
              14
              Quote: GRAY
              "Александра Ткаченко" можно к делу приставить.

              He is already at work. Here he is passing the Bosphorus
          4. Manul
            Manul 14 October 2015 14: 17 New
            +8
            Quote: avt
            That's just how much it, or rather, in what time frame, will be dragged by an old BDK ???

            Can't we rent the Mistral from Egypt? So for 30 years ..
            1. avt
              avt 14 October 2015 14: 24 New
              +1
              Quote: Manul
              Can't we rent the Mistral from Egypt? So for 30 years ..

              We’ll wait and see, but the authorities have already cried out - God forbid we are resold.
              Quote: GRAY
              "Александра Ткаченко" можно к делу приставить.

              Quote: atalef
              The problem is that Turkey has the right to inspect civilian vessels when passing the Bosphorus.
              those. the ship must be uniquely military.

              request Something like this, of course, as military transport could be stocked, but not from Novorossiysk for sure.
              1. GRAY
                GRAY 14 October 2015 14: 28 New
                +2
                Quote: avt
                Something like this, of course, as military transport could be stocked, but not from Novorossiysk for sure.

                "Александра" уже гоняли в Сирию, с сопровождением естественно.
              2. lelikas
                lelikas 14 October 2015 14: 43 New
                +5
                В порядке бреда - "Севморпуть" - Туда влезет все - и танки и БМП с БТРами ;)
                It is clear that no one will do this, but I would love to look at him in a ball.
                1. Alexey RA
                  Alexey RA 14 October 2015 17: 25 New
                  12
                  Quote: lelikas
                  В порядке бреда - "Севморпуть" - Туда влезет все - и танки и БМП с БТРами ;)

                  And what a good option.
                  "Будете мешать доставлять технику в Сирию на гражданских судах - переведём на Чёрное море "СМП" и будем 4 раза в месяц проходить через проливы. Атомный реактор через центр Стамбула - туда... сюда... туда... сюда...". laughing
              3. kamikaze
                kamikaze 14 October 2015 21: 11 New
                0
                in Syria would put the sunshine Pinocchio would still be fine
                1. kamikaze
                  kamikaze 14 October 2015 21: 27 New
                  0
                  this car on bearded men igil will fry their beards
                2. Vadim237
                  Vadim237 14 October 2015 23: 07 New
                  -1
                  Sunshine and Pinocchio are useless against quickly maneuvering small enemy groups in jeeps and in underground shelters and tunnels.
                  1. SIvan
                    SIvan 15 October 2015 16: 17 New
                    +3
                    Quote: Vadim237
                    Sunshine and Pinocchio are useless against quickly maneuvering small enemy groups in jeeps and in underground shelters and tunnels.

                    Just in all tunnels and burrows, the thermobar works well, because gas is spreading. Or is it a delusion?
                    For example, in Jobar there were no civilians at all, only militants moving through tunnels.
                  2. Gogia
                    Gogia 15 October 2015 21: 47 New
                    +4
                    At the expense of underground shelters in vain. Just the very thing. There is no oxygen left and the pressure drops a lot in the area of ​​the rupture of the ammunition.
              4. Manul
                Manul 15 October 2015 00: 14 New
                +1
                Quote: avt
                We’ll wait and see, but the authorities have already cried out - God forbid we are resold.

                That's just the point - for sure there is a clause on the non-resale of Russia in the contract with Egypt. And suddenly they forgot to say about the lease .. winked
                And why did you close up the cons, for the post I quote? what request I didn’t see anything terrible. Maybe it will fly to me now. belay
          5. Omskgasmyas
            Omskgasmyas 15 October 2015 11: 11 New
            +2
            Закупается флотилия б\у сухогрузов - 8 шт. Фото первого уже были в сети. Введен в состав вспомогательного флота ВМФ России и поднят флаг. Вот на них и будет держаться "Сирийский экспресс". А БДК пока отдохнут или будут возить важные грузы.
        2. Pavel Vereshchagin
          Pavel Vereshchagin 14 October 2015 13: 19 New
          +5
          Согласен, техника нужна Сирийцам, без нее трудно одолеть головорезов, но вот вони от америкосовских "партнеров" будет предостаточно.Хотя нам на это накласть.
          1. vovanpain
            vovanpain 14 October 2015 13: 28 New
            12
            Quote: Pavel Vereshchagin
            Согласен, техника нужна Сирийцам, без нее трудно одолеть головорезов, но вот вони от америкосовских "партнеров" будет предостаточно.Хотя нам на это накласть.

            Yes, stink from them, and so won’t take so long, so what? The mongrels bark our caravan.
        3. prosto_rgb
          prosto_rgb 14 October 2015 22: 52 New
          0
          Quote: vovanpain
          Need help, without technology Syrians will be hard

          Of course it is.
          Just one question.
          Where are the active protection systems?
          1. lelikas
            lelikas 15 October 2015 01: 06 New
            +3
            Quote: prosto_rgb
            Where are the active protection systems?

            As they say, not for us, in Odessa - but where do we have active protection systems? The only car where it is nominally provided is the very one, Armata ....
        4. Semen Semyonitch
          Semen Semyonitch 17 October 2015 11: 26 New
          0
          Quote: vovanpain
          Need help, without technology Syrians will be hard

          Who would have thought? what
      2. NEXUS
        NEXUS 14 October 2015 14: 48 New
        +4
        Quote: hedgehog in the fog
        in a good way, the technique will fall into the right hands soldier

        Tornadoes must also be sent to Alligators with the Night Hunters. And we’ll run around the technique and make an extra crap with the Ishilians.
    2. Tor5
      Tor5 14 October 2015 13: 16 New
      +5
      Очень разумное и конкретное решение! А матрасня пусть сбрасывает "умеренным по 50 тн.
      any g ... a.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. Michael easily
          Michael easily 14 October 2015 13: 51 New
          +4
          Такая "завуалированная" координация - куда "груз", туда и "наливай" )
        2. abrakadabre
          abrakadabre 14 October 2015 15: 56 New
          +3
          And in response to make an official thank you for such a designation. Depicting in all seriousness.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. Air Force captain
      Air Force captain 14 October 2015 13: 43 New
      +4
      Lord help them ... in the battle with the forces of evil in your name, accept the souls of the fallen and innocently killed in your kingdom of heaven, for You do not know the difference in the children of men, but judge them by their actions. Amen
      1. ASK505
        ASK505 14 October 2015 14: 49 New
        +3
        Hope for God, but do not make it yourself.
    5. marlin1203
      marlin1203 14 October 2015 14: 48 New
      +3
      Good technology, good people! laughing
    6. Maxom75
      Maxom75 14 October 2015 14: 52 New
      +3
      So began the Russian Langlis to Syria. In exchange, it is necessary to demand an air force base, navy and shelf in extraterritorial control (i.e. for 250 years in the ownership of Russia, then we will return it).)))
      1. nail1972
        nail1972 15 October 2015 15: 46 New
        +4
        Soon we will have a rest on the beaches in Syria? wink
    7. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 14 October 2015 16: 00 New
      +1
      Finally, we are constantly discussing with friends why they still haven’t sent a batch of T-72s.
    8. Serg 122
      Serg 122 14 October 2015 18: 51 New
      +4
      ... Let them ask Petra Porazhenko for advice ...

      This one will advise ... wassat
    9. kamikaze
      kamikaze 14 October 2015 21: 34 New
      +1
      with such a machine you can turn the hell out of igil
    10. Oleg552
      Oleg552 16 October 2015 02: 38 New
      0
      Do not believe those who say that quitting smoking in a week is impossible. There is a special and really working technique that will save you from this addiction in a few days, here https://dmitrinosov.blogspot.ru link Itself could not quit for a very long time, but this time it really happened.
  2. DMoroz
    DMoroz 14 October 2015 13: 09 New
    +5
    It is necessary to supply them with ground weapons, during the battles it really is not enough
  3. Frigate
    Frigate 14 October 2015 13: 10 New
    +3
    But the problem is not only in tanks, but also in crews. Preparing a crew is more difficult than buying a tank.
    1. RUSIVAN
      RUSIVAN 14 October 2015 13: 12 New
      +6
      The Syrians are already familiar with this technique, there will be no problems, and if something, ours will help to figure it out ...
  4. RUSIVAN
    RUSIVAN 14 October 2015 13: 10 New
    +2
    This is very good, the Syrians really need technology.
    1. venaya
      venaya 14 October 2015 13: 15 New
      +2
      Quote: RUSIVAN
      This is very good, the Syrians really need technology.

      Finally, the real use of our military equipment. No wonder people worked, and now come in handy.
  5. made13
    made13 14 October 2015 13: 11 New
    +9
    Correctly. Let Russian technology recall its effectiveness. Sales will grow and the image of the country too good
  6. IAlex
    IAlex 14 October 2015 13: 11 New
    +2
    She is not there yet ???
    1. kil 31
      kil 31 14 October 2015 13: 15 New
      +3
      It seems that the BDK is loading 10 tanks. They need a lot, so you need to think about what other ships to supply them.
      1. IAlex
        IAlex 14 October 2015 13: 21 New
        -4
        Well, in order to think of supplies, it took 4 years, you see after another four years you’ll guess how to put all this ...
  7. mQn
    mQn 14 October 2015 13: 12 New
    +7
    I think this is from the reserves of canned food .....
  8. Engineer
    Engineer 14 October 2015 13: 13 New
    -32
    What trash is this ?! !!!! Where is the normal technique? Where is the T-90SM? Where is the BMP-3?
    1. BLACK-SHARK-64
      BLACK-SHARK-64 14 October 2015 13: 17 New
      +4
      do not rush bro everything in due time ... angry
    2. Dyatko Nebatko
      Dyatko Nebatko 14 October 2015 13: 20 New
      11
      What they can use, they will receive it! I think that for free, because. in difficult times you need to help unselfishly! yes
      And the new ones will come in handy.
      1. Engineer
        Engineer 14 October 2015 13: 33 New
        -21
        The whole site laughed at the Saxons and Hamers decommissioned for Ukraine, while they themselves do the same with Syria and everyone is silent. That is what tanks mean are waiting for 500 anti-tank American complexes of the Tou Syrian opposition.
        1. Wedmak
          Wedmak 14 October 2015 13: 40 New
          10
          Well, it’s as if we were not written off. And probably from the warehouses. Again, cars are not tanks.
        2. Alexey RA
          Alexey RA 14 October 2015 13: 54 New
          15
          Quote: Engineer
          The whole site laughed at the Saxons and Hamers decommissioned for Ukraine, while they themselves do the same with Syria and everyone is silent.

          And when did we manage to write off the T-72B and BMP-2? what
          Or do you think that our entire army has already been rearmament on the T-72B3 and BMP-3? There is none - the legacy of the USSR is still in order. Here is the news from 25.08.2015/XNUMX/XNUMX:
          An active phase has begun at the training ground of the Tsugol Eastern Military District during the joint Russian-Mongolian military training Selenga-2015, the press service of the Eastern Military District said.

          On Tuesday, August 25, the combined force grouping involved in the maneuvers completed the crossing of the Onon River section.

          During the practical phase of the training, the crews T-72B tanks, BMP-2 infantry fighting vehicles, armored personnel carriers BTR-80 crossed the water section of the river with a depth of about two and a half and a width of about 120 meters.

          So the Syrians will fight on the same technique that our fighters serve on.
          1. star44
            star44 14 October 2015 15: 51 New
            +6
            ... During the practical stage of the training, the crews of T-72B tanks, BMP-2 infantry fighting vehicles, BTR-80 armored personnel carriers overcame ...
            Больше похоже на боевое слаживание экипажей перед длительной командировкой... Как в старом анекдоте: "... Ну ка, парень, подвинься, сейчас мы им покажем..." laughing But seriously - now the Syrians are not up to retraining for new equipment. It is necessary to free their land while the Russians help. There is not much time left ...
          2. The comment was deleted.
        3. Eugene-Eugene
          Eugene-Eugene 14 October 2015 15: 10 New
          +6
          In any case, this is better than T-55, which can only be seen on fotovideo
    3. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 14 October 2015 13: 30 New
      20
      Quote: Engineer
      What trash is this ?! !!!! Where is the normal technique? Where is the T-90SM? Where is the BMP-3?

      Where in Syria are trained crews for all this?
      In addition, against the background of what Assad’s forces are fighting in Syria, the T-72B and BMP-2 are new.
    4. provincial
      provincial 14 October 2015 13: 32 New
      0
      This must still be bought.
    5. Leks69Rus
      Leks69Rus 14 October 2015 13: 35 New
      -8
      I think ours are afraid that they will destroy the Syrians with the latest technology. IMHO Assad troops are fighting disgustingly and such hands and Abrams burn well. What kind of tactics is it is to drive several tanks into the city without infantry and to naughty in all directions, while the militants calmly use this equipment from the tanks. It would be better, of course, to put the T-72b3, although they are again afraid of losses. I think these t72b are also modernized. Replacing the contact with contact 5 is easy to think.
      1. Wedmak
        Wedmak 14 October 2015 13: 45 New
        +2
        Here is the time to deliver the B3 version. This is generally an economical version of B2. Compare the protection and understand everything.
    6. lopvlad
      lopvlad 14 October 2015 14: 23 New
      +1
      Where is the T-90SM? Where is the BMP-3?

      then to learn how to use it for six months?
      1. sharp-lad
        sharp-lad 14 October 2015 20: 07 New
        +2
        The reality is that training will really take up too much precious time, and the old, but combat-ready equipment, familiar to the Syrian fighters, will now be the best help! hi
  9. Awaz
    Awaz 14 October 2015 13: 19 New
    +1
    that is, Ukrainians still did not destroy all the stocks of armored vehicles)))) Although yes, the equipment does not seem to be ice. But for Syria it should do. Junk crews are easier to collect. Although a few new ones should be rolled away
    1. northern
      northern 14 October 2015 14: 44 New
      +2
      And Ukrainians here what side? Appliances from the Russian Federation, throw substances.
      1. Awaz
        Awaz 14 October 2015 15: 59 New
        +2
        well how. We read the censor, everything is written there. All tanks, all the way to Almaty are burned ...
        1. northern
          northern 14 October 2015 16: 52 New
          +1
          well, here you are, sorry for hitting then.
          I just don’t go to garbage dumps, I'm afraid I’ll start puke on the monitor.
  10. WE ARE MAKING
    WE ARE MAKING 14 October 2015 13: 20 New
    +3
    Friends must have! Friends need help!
    1. northern
      northern 14 October 2015 17: 02 New
      +2
      No need to have friends, we are not US.
      Friends must be protected.
  11. TIO1969
    TIO1969 14 October 2015 13: 21 New
    15
    To solve the current challenges in Syria, these models of equipment are optimal. Do not use a microscope to chop nuts. And another important point, the readiness of the Syrian army to exploit precisely this technique. Indeed, the equipment itself without crews costs nothing!
  12. ikshacooper
    ikshacooper 14 October 2015 13: 22 New
    13
    Quote: Engineer
    What trash is this ?! !!!! Where is the normal technique? Where is the T-90SM? Where is the BMP-3?

    Может еще и "Арматы" с "Курганцами"?))) БМП-2 и Т-72Б вполне достаточно для Сирийской армии, учитывая уровень вооруженности боевиков ИГ, тем более на безвозмездной основе!
    1. Engineer
      Engineer 14 October 2015 13: 25 New
      -32
      Why not the T-34 then? That the Syrian army is not worthy of modern technology? Or do you think they are such savages that they can only fight on used technology 30 years ago?
      1. lelikas
        lelikas 14 October 2015 13: 32 New
        +5
        Quote: Engineer
        Why not the T-34 then? That the Syrian army is not worthy of modern technology? Or do you think they are such savages that they can only fight on used technology 30 years ago?

        Really ready to pay for them out of your pocket? Only honestly, discarding all reservations?
      2. Alexey RA
        Alexey RA 14 October 2015 13: 34 New
        16
        Quote: Engineer
        Why not the T-34 then? That the Syrian army is not worthy of modern technology? Or do you think they are such savages that they can only fight on used technology 30 years ago?

        Syria did not previously have a BMP-3 or T-90. That is, there are no trained crews, no maintenance and repair specialists, no spare parts, no combat use experience (the same BMP-3, seduced by its 100th gun, can begin to be used as a light tank with predictable consequences).
        And most importantly - Syria now has no time for training. Technique is needed at the front, and this technique must be familiar.
        1. Seryoga DV
          Seryoga DV 14 October 2015 13: 56 New
          +1
          I'm wondering:
          72nd always went for export without a conveyor, while our conveyors stood at all
          Will these be with conveyors?
          on the assembly line, I think it’s not difficult to relearn
      3. Setrac
        Setrac 16 October 2015 09: 29 New
        +2
        Quote: Engineer
        Why not the T-34 then? That the Syrian army is not worthy of modern technology? Or do you think they are such savages that they can only fight on used technology 30 years ago?

        ,, Do not savages ,, let themselves produce armored vehicles
      4. rc56
        rc56 16 October 2015 14: 12 New
        +2
        Quote: Engineer
        Why not the T-34 then? That the Syrian army is not worthy of modern technology? Or do you think they are such savages that they can only fight on used technology 30 years ago?


        T-34-85 all went to the same Syria in the summer of 1982.

        He himself saw how they removed from the URs and drove under their own power from Barabash to Slavyanka for loading. For an hour, on the side of the road with his auto club, he was sunbathing while the columns passed one after another.

        И отправляли эти 34-ки не из-за жадности, а именно из-за скорости подготовки экипажей. Как говорят, 72-ки тогда себя очень не плохо там себя зарекомендовали. Только экипажи на них были - все наши "инструктора".
        .
  13. Wedmak
    Wedmak 14 October 2015 13: 22 New
    +3
    У правого танка на крышке инфракрасной "фары" милый такой череп нарисован. Не по уставу как-то, не? ))) А заднем плане БДК стоит. Таки "Сирийский экспресс" ожидает увеличение интенсивности ходок.
    1. northern
      northern 14 October 2015 17: 04 New
      +1
      Maybe the factory workers have fun, people too.
  14. demo
    demo 14 October 2015 13: 23 New
    +4
    The Syrian army may soon receive the long-awaited Russian armored vehicles - T-72 and BMP-2, at least the accumulation of such equipment “in the characteristic Syrian camouflage” was recorded in one of the southern ports of Russia, the Vestnik Mordoviya agency writes.

    The humble Messenger of Mordovia did not name the glorious hero city of Novorossiysk.
    Syrians cool help.
  15. Krsk
    Krsk 14 October 2015 13: 24 New
    +1
    Ice is not ice but Surprise can arrange full-format
  16. VNP1958PVN
    VNP1958PVN 14 October 2015 13: 26 New
    +6
    The ISIS will strongly regret that they are going to take the Russian Caucasus!
  17. chunga-changa
    chunga-changa 14 October 2015 13: 26 New
    -18
    And at whose expense is all this banquet? What and how does Assad give us?
    1. Dyatko Nebatko
      Dyatko Nebatko 14 October 2015 13: 27 New
      +7
      Do not carry the blizzard! In difficult times they help unselfishly !!!
      1. Saratoga833
        Saratoga833 14 October 2015 14: 10 New
        +5
        Quote: Dyatko Nebatko
        In difficult times they help unselfishly !!!

        Нам американцы помогали в период ВОВ отнюдь не бескорыстно, но до сих пор гордятся, что "общими усилиями" победили фашистскую Германию. А про то, что после войны мы, при разрушенном хозяйстве, платили за эту помощь - помалкивают!
        1. lelikas
          lelikas 15 October 2015 01: 14 New
          0
          Quote: Saratoga833
          Нам американцы помогали в период ВОВ отнюдь не бескорыстно, но до сих пор гордятся, что "общими усилиями" победили фашистскую Германию. А про то, что после войны мы, при разрушенном хозяйстве, платили за эту помощь - помалкивают!

          For the sake of justice - the equipment supplied by the Americans according to lend-lease - was free, as well as lost in the battles, the one that was left to itself after the war - was payable - they paid for it. The British are another matter - they managed to sell us their equipment, receiving in return American.
      2. chunga-changa
        chunga-changa 14 October 2015 14: 26 New
        -3
        In difficult times they help unselfishly !!!

        Selflessly, this means without profit - at cost. What you mean is called - for free. At whose expense is it free? Who helped us in hard times for free?
        1. abrakadabre
          abrakadabre 14 October 2015 16: 06 New
          +2
          Как говорил гражданин Воланд у Булгакова: "рыба может быть только первой свежести, она же и последней. Второй свежести - значит тухлая" Так и с вашими игрищами про бесплатную и бескорыстную помощь.
        2. Garris199
          Garris199 15 October 2015 01: 56 New
          +2
          Do not have a hundred rubles, but have a hundred friends (s). And a full-fledged, powerful base (with a penny rent or without it at all) in the Mediterranean region. Then we have these tanks (T-72b) in storage, at least ass. Chew, a few thousand for sure. But we haven’t riveted them for beauty, after all, right?
    2. Wedmak
      Wedmak 14 October 2015 13: 30 New
      15
      Будем в отпуск туда ездить по скидкам, когда все кончится. А если серьезно, какой счет товарисчщь?? Там бородачи с калашами бегают, горла людям режут. Еще пол-года, год и на наш Кавказ пожалуют. А Америка им деньжат и оружия подбросит. Что тогда говорить будете? "Чего мы тогда Асаду не помогли?"
      1. northern
        northern 14 October 2015 17: 08 New
        +1
        It will whine, like all other liberals that Putin has completely lost.
    3. rc56
      rc56 16 October 2015 14: 15 New
      +2
      Quote: chunga-changa
      And at whose expense is all this banquet? What and how does Assad give us?


      The cradle of his army, which must grind bandyuk before they get to the UK and the SA.
  18. Starik72
    Starik72 14 October 2015 13: 27 New
    +2
    This is the thing! And then the Shtatovites can be helped by scum-cutters, but that we can’t help Bashar Assad! It is necessary to deliver the equipment to the Syrians, but faster! Our air strikes are excellent, but mother’s fellow countryman also needs to be cleaned from these thugs-thugs, here tanks and armored personnel carriers come in handy, and other equipment will not hurt!
  19. Algetxnumx
    Algetxnumx 14 October 2015 13: 28 New
    0
    Everything is correct and understandable, we will help, we will help and help, but all the time there is one question that is waiting for so long, why it was allowed to bring such a situation, but there is no explanation for this question from anyone, nor from our government, nor from any kind of analysts, complete silence, but I would like to hear an intelligible answer.
    1. dsi
      dsi 14 October 2015 13: 54 New
      +2
      but I would like to hear an intelligible answer.

      Are you in Russia or where. Take a look around, just figured out Georgia, Donbass was blazing at its side, again Crimea. We have just begun to declare ourselves as a worthy power, and you are such requirements. Therefore, analysts are silent because they see no reason to explain the obvious ...
    2. Seryoga DV
      Seryoga DV 14 October 2015 14: 10 New
      +2
      purely my opinion, they simply were not ready: everything themselves hung in the balance (a real war with NATO could begin over Crimea) and everything was more complicated with China. In addition, apparently, there was hope that after solving the problem of Obama’s red dashes, government forces would cope with the opposition themselves, and ISIS is a fairly recent Western invention.
      the crisis with Ukraine was (and remains) a pretty serious thing, since they began to rattle with nuclear weapons.
      perhaps it was important to solve the Iranian problem - my everyday foreboding of the war there was very strong
  20. bronik
    bronik 14 October 2015 13: 32 New
    +5
    The very case when presenting is cheaper for us. Around the pluses.
  21. The comment was deleted.
    1. ASK505
      ASK505 14 October 2015 14: 54 New
      +2
      Tell the enemy what you still saw there. Chatterbox is a godsend for the enemy.
    2. northern
      northern 14 October 2015 17: 11 New
      +1
      Are you talking about all the movements of military equipment in open sources?
  22. starriuy
    starriuy 14 October 2015 13: 38 New
    +5
    I think they will quickly throw ....
  23. starriuy
    starriuy 14 October 2015 13: 41 New
    +5
    How many flights
    1. Victorio
      Victorio 14 October 2015 21: 44 New
      +2
      why put such things?
  24. kizhe
    kizhe 14 October 2015 13: 42 New
    +2
    Still to slow down the supply of US weapons and then generally ice.
  25. Mera joota
    Mera joota 14 October 2015 13: 43 New
    -5
    "Бизнес по-русски - спирт продали, деньги пропили.." Начать масштабное наступление на Т-55/62, потерять подготовленные экипажи, а поставку лучших (чем Т-55/62) Т-72 оставить на потом... Типа экипажи наберут новые?
    1. Setrac
      Setrac 16 October 2015 09: 33 New
      0
      Crews gained experience in the battles, while experienced crews won on any equipment.
  26. gukoyan
    gukoyan 14 October 2015 13: 43 New
    +2
    That's great!
    Just the guys are now on the offensive, and fresh tank injections will give their plus in the offensive and on the defensive.
  27. starriuy
    starriuy 14 October 2015 13: 44 New
    0
    Just this year to Syria
  28. starriuy
    starriuy 14 October 2015 13: 45 New
    -1
    And the very beginning
  29. katalonec2014
    katalonec2014 14 October 2015 13: 47 New
    +2
    Definitely good news, the equipment of the devastated country is just as needed, the Syrians will be grateful, since this is real help, consider humanitarian aid.
  30. LAB1959
    LAB1959 14 October 2015 13: 49 New
    +8
    Вопрос по типу танков должен рассматриваться под углом обученности сирийских танкистов и целям. Так как воевать с Абрамсами не предстоит, то Т-72 вполне подходит, так как пушка с Т-90 такая же и танк для сирийцев знакомый. А вот почему наши не ставят автоматическую защитную систему "Арена" (если не ошибаюсь в названии),то это уже другой вопрос. И систему прокачаем в боевой обстановку и людей спасем. Но не понятно почему не пошлют машины огневой поддержки " Терминатор" вот это уже совсем не понятно. Кроме этого не мешает и отправить "Ноны" может и "Вену", не понятно где новые САУ на базе миномета 120мм? Не ясно почему не вбросить новые бесшумные снайперки 12,7мм, как раз для городских боев - по стенам в полкирпича самое-то. Ратник для опыта нприменения и проверки бронестойкости, даже без систем связи и то будет хорошо. Испытать в бою необходимо всю новую технику, вспомните Испанию, где и И-16 и Т-26 дали опыт для создания новых самолётов и танков. А по стоимости танков можно сказать так, чем больше отдадим Т-72 старых образцов, тем больше будем иметь возможность обновить свой танковый парк и резерв.
    Speaking of fees, keeping a fleet at sea is expensive at three, and after the Libyan and Yugoslav ports were lost, this was a guard at all.
    1. Saratoga833
      Saratoga833 14 October 2015 14: 24 New
      +1
      The Syrians need to fight here and now, and they will only be happy with the supplied weapons, especially since the equipment is familiar.
  31. Mama_Cholli
    Mama_Cholli 14 October 2015 13: 50 New
    +3
    If lane-throwers throw ammunition from their planes to Ishilov’s aircraft, then why not help the Syrian army with the necessary machines?
  32. BOB044
    BOB044 14 October 2015 13: 58 New
    +1
    A reasonable decision, it is necessary to strengthen those countries where our military bases will be.
    1. padded jacket
      padded jacket 14 October 2015 14: 03 New
      0
      A very wise decision has long said it is necessary to arm Syria, Iraq, Hezbollah and Iran to help advisers and technical experts and let them destroy the terrorists.
  33. Goldmitro
    Goldmitro 14 October 2015 14: 03 New
    +3
    Quote: chunga-changa
    And at whose expense is all this banquet? What and how does Assad give us?

    He gives the lives of Syrian soldiers who have been grinding all jihadist scum from all over the world for 4 years in Syria, including from our republics of the Caucasus, where they can return if ISIS triumphs!
  34. Ustyuzhanin-35
    Ustyuzhanin-35 14 October 2015 14: 18 New
    +2
    Technology is ours, soldiers are yours. The only way!
  35. starriuy
    starriuy 14 October 2015 14: 21 New
    +3
    And here is more significant news. In Murmansk the other day, hastily curtailed, lasting only four months - unimaginably small for such a huge ship! - repair of our only aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov. Next week, he will already embark on the Severomorsk raid, at the end of October he will receive the aircraft of the 279th separate naval fighter regiment of the Northern Fleet. And then it will go to the Barents Sea to provide training flights.

    The rush for our naval reality is simply unimaginable. After all, usually even ships of much smaller sizes and combat capabilities, after being repaired for months, have been in bases. Replenish supplies and conduct naval exercises. Checkers of all ranks do not come off their decks. Of the crews, the headquarters of the rope twist, establishing a combat organization. Then - gradual completion of course tasks.

    And then from the factory wall - and immediately to the sea? This happens only in urgent circumstances.
    Information from the Rusnext site ...
    1. starriuy
      starriuy 14 October 2015 14: 28 New
      0
      What is it for ?....
  36. Izotovp
    Izotovp 14 October 2015 14: 42 New
    -1
    We need self-propelled guns, mortars and RPO.
    1. ASK505
      ASK505 14 October 2015 14: 57 New
      -2
      Make a complete list of the necessary weapons for Syria and run to the General Staff.
      1. Izotovp
        Izotovp 14 October 2015 15: 42 New
        +2
        This is a thought !! Only to run far away, it is easier for a classmate to write there)))
  37. Dima Čalevo
    Dima Čalevo 14 October 2015 14: 50 New
    +2
    It is high time, in Russia this good in bulk in storage, and will help the Syrians. In the last video, from there the tanks are completely T-62 and T-55 lined with sandbags, well, this tin is already completely ..
  38. nazar_0753
    nazar_0753 14 October 2015 15: 18 New
    -2
    Nice to see the Novorossiysk Mountains in the background
  39. TOR2
    TOR2 14 October 2015 15: 41 New
    +1
    As for the T-72B tanks, they have dynamic protection, which is able to neutralize the cumulative ammunition.
    Там походу помимо динамической защиты скоро и "Штора" понадобится.
  40. Sasha75
    Sasha75 14 October 2015 16: 32 New
    +5
    Well, so for reference. T 34-85 in Syria, they are fighting two, they just fought off the attack at the air base, they were helped by the SU-100 model 1944. The ammunition was small, so they shot it and abandoned it, and their fate is not known. And who is so sure that they are only fighting with new weapons, they show us combat-ready units and there’s one old thing, yes it’s all the best that’s left and T55 is what’s left and there’s need some kind of equipment, if we throw off all our old stuff there for disposal accumulated and will be happy about it. Already slipping Mosin rifles in a sniper version. And so there they fight for both old and proven and cheap weapons on both sides, and a few videos about the use of anti-tank systems are PR people who don’t remember, I remind the Americans how many tens of thousands of greens in Afghanistan were bought by unused Stingers, we will soon see a replay buy all that thrown if they sell back.
    Add a photo than they are fighting.
    1. the47th
      the47th 16 October 2015 18: 39 New
      +1
      Мосинка сейчас вполне себе продаётся в магазинах. До "старья" ей пока далековато.
  41. Sasha75
    Sasha75 14 October 2015 16: 35 New
    +6
    Who did not understand Degtyarev.
  42. Sasha75
    Sasha75 14 October 2015 16: 36 New
    +2
    Also not new.
    1. Dima Čalevo
      Dima Čalevo 14 October 2015 23: 08 New
      +1
      And what's that? czech bran
      1. just exp
        just exp 15 October 2015 20: 57 New
        0
        but Czech? not aglitsky?
  43. Sasha75
    Sasha75 14 October 2015 16: 38 New
    +2
    And this place at the auction will be very expensive.
  44. Sasha75
    Sasha75 14 October 2015 16: 39 New
    +1
    Although there it is not a rarity.
  45. Sasha75
    Sasha75 14 October 2015 16: 46 New
    +4
    Not Syria, but in those parts.
  46. Sasha75
    Sasha75 14 October 2015 16: 47 New
    +3
    Not Syria, but in those parts ..
    1. vkfriendly
      vkfriendly 16 October 2015 14: 27 New
      0
      with what fright, the Syrian flag in the distance
  47. Sasha75
    Sasha75 14 October 2015 16: 48 New
    +6
    Not Syria, but in those parts ...
  48. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 14 October 2015 16: 52 New
    +3
    T-72 tanks are suitable for Syrians. They are used to them.
    But will there be enough competent tankers? Almost all tankers are Alawites.
    They are loyal to the president, but recruits are often peasants - teach them
    technology is not fast.
    1. stonks
      stonks 14 October 2015 17: 22 New
      0
      Та же первая мысль: "А экипажи???"
    2. sharp-lad
      sharp-lad 14 October 2015 20: 13 New
      0
      But still, the T72B is not the T90 in the latest versions, in addition, there are still enough Syrian tankers able to train new crews.
    3. Astrahanec
      Astrahanec 15 October 2015 18: 20 New
      0
      There was a conversation about Cuban tankers. Maybe not a duck?
  49. GDV
    GDV 14 October 2015 19: 55 New
    +2
    And more bumblebees and bumblebees ... a lot of bumblebees, back oil.
    1. Awaz
      Awaz 14 October 2015 20: 33 New
      +4
      like now Bumblebees do not wear honey but oil))))
  50. Awaz
    Awaz 14 October 2015 20: 35 New
    +4
    Arabs are writing about Turkish tanks in Syria ... They ate something there ... they and the Turks lost rams altogether. They provoke a really serious conflict. What climb (if true) in the area where the Russian Aerospace Forces are bandaged.