Media: preparing to send to Syria the party of Russian T-72 and BMP-2

The Syrian army may soon receive the long-awaited Russian armored vehicles - T-72 and BMP-2, at least the accumulation of such equipment "in characteristic Syrian camouflage" was recorded in one of the southern ports of Russia, the agency writes Messenger of Mordovia.


Media: preparing to send to Syria the party of Russian T-72 and BMP-2


During the war, the Syrian army suffered heavy losses in tanks and other armored vehicles. Now, in the conditions of an unfolding offensive against the positions of the Islamists, the Syrians are forced to fight on the old and vulnerable to anti-tank weapons of the enemy.

"Concerning tanks T-72B, they have dynamic protection, which is able to neutralize cumulative ammunition. In addition, these combat vehicles are capable of using guided weapons, ”the author notes.

The number of BMP-2, which are in service with government forces, is also very small. Machines have proven themselves in battles and are highly valued by the Syrian soldiers.

Photos used:
http://otvaga2004.mybb.ru/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

152 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. sever.56 14 October 2015 13: 09 New
    • 62
    • 0
    +62
    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2015/566/scwn886.png
    1. hedgehog in the fog 14 October 2015 13: 10 New
      • 43
      • 0
      +43
      in a good way, the technique will fall into the right hands soldier
      1. vovanpain 14 October 2015 13: 13 New
        • 32
        • 0
        +32
        Need help, without technology Syrians will be hard
        1. avt
          avt 14 October 2015 13: 18 New
          • 12
          • 0
          +12
          Quote: vovanpain
          Need help, without technology Syrians will be hard

          request That's just how much it, or rather, in what time frame, will be dragged by an old BDK ???
          Quote: Frigate
          But the problem is not only in tanks, but also in crews. Preparing a crew is more difficult than buying a tank.

          Quote: RUSIVAN
          Riyans are already familiar with this technique, there will be no problems, and if something, ours will help to figure it out ..

          good The already familiar 72s and deuces are going to drive, Campaign for the Assad Guard.
          1. lelikas 14 October 2015 13: 42 New
            • 26
            • 0
            +26
            775 Ave. - 13 pieces are taken, although, if we were our place, I would have long ago introduced a normal dry cargo ship or something more abruptly from the civilian fleet, and then brought it back.
            1. atalef 14 October 2015 13: 48 New
              • 20
              • 0
              +20
              Quote: lelikas
              775 Ave. - 13 pieces are taken, although, if we were our place, I would have long ago introduced a normal dry cargo ship or something more abruptly from the civilian fleet, and then brought it back.

              Проблема , гражданские суда турция имеет право досматривать при прохождении Босфора.
              those. the ship must be uniquely military.
              As I understand it.
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. bulvas 14 October 2015 14: 13 New
                • 15
                • 0
                +15
                Quote: atalef

                Проблема , гражданские суда турция имеет право досматривать при прохождении Босфора.
                those. the ship must be uniquely military.
                As I understand it.


                Only not the Black Sea countries

                1. tolian 15 October 2015 10: 59 New
                  • 3
                  • 0
                  +3
                  Apparently wrong. Straits passed. Reported for cargo to the Turks.
                2. nail1972 15 October 2015 15: 36 New
                  • 10
                  • 0
                  +10
                  Today there was a message about the inclusion in the Black Sea Fleet of transport ships (from 3 to 8 pcs. According to various sources), purchased from Turkey. It is planned that they will be listed as an auxiliary fleet, and fly under the Andreevsky flag. And no one has the right to inspect warships.
              3. lelikas 14 October 2015 14: 40 New
                • 7
                • 0
                +7
                Quote: atalef
                The problem is that Turkey has the right to inspect civilian vessels when passing the Bosphorus.
                those. the ship must be uniquely military.
                As I understand it.

                Everything is correct; therefore, it must be included in the fleet.
                1. Rusich is not from Kiev 15 October 2015 01: 28 New
                  • 4
                  • 0
                  +4
                  Quote: lelikas
                  Everything is correct; therefore, it must be included in the fleet.

                  So maybe they have already entered, how much do we know.
              4. Maxom75 14 October 2015 14: 53 New
                • 6
                • 0
                +6
                There are no problems, the bulk carrier will be transferred to the Navy and then it will be a military one.
              5. Lord of the Sith 14 October 2015 15: 26 New
                • 8
                • 0
                +8
                Quote: atalef
                Проблема , гражданские суда турция имеет право досматривать при прохождении Босфора.
                those. the ship must be uniquely military.
                As I understand it.

                Yes, but still not in the military convoy.
              6. abrakadabre 14 October 2015 15: 53 New
                • 8
                • 0
                +8
                This is precisely what the bulk carrier enters into the Navy. With the raising of the naval flag, painting the hull in a military color, installing a pair of artillery turrets.
              7. Alexander Romanov 14 October 2015 15: 55 New
                • 6
                • 0
                +6
                Quote: atalef
                The problem is that Turkey has the right to inspect civilian vessels when passing the Bosphorus.
                those. the ship must be uniquely military.

                Yes, it’s not a question of Sanya, you officially enter the civilian cargo ship into the Navy, you hang up the pennant of the Navy and go.
              8. tolian 15 October 2015 10: 58 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Most likely so!
              9. Michael-rl 17 October 2015 03: 05 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                http://bmpd.livejournal.com/1523279.html
            2. atalef 14 October 2015 13: 48 New
              • -3
              • 0
              -3
              Quote: lelikas
              775 Ave. - 13 pieces are taken, although, if we were our place, I would have long ago introduced a normal dry cargo ship or something more abruptly from the civilian fleet, and then brought it back.

              Проблема , гражданские суда турция имеет право досматривать при прохождении Босфора.
              those. the ship must be uniquely military.
              As I understand it.
              1. APASUS 14 October 2015 19: 29 New
                • 3
                • 0
                +3
                Quote: atalef
                Проблема , гражданские суда турция имеет право досматривать при прохождении Босфора.т.е. корабль должен быть однозначно военным.

                Turks flagrantly violate the Montreux Convention, arrogating to themselves the right to search foreign ships.
                For example, in 1997, the Republic of Cyprus wished to purchase the S-300 anti-aircraft missile system in the Russian Federation, which in those years was a completely routine matter. Both the Russians sold the S-300, and the Americans supplied their similar Patriot system to dozens of countries, including the Mediterranean. But here the Turkish government said that it would seize by force ships carrying the S-300 to Cyprus, and even carried out an illegal search in the straits of several ships flying the flags of Ukraine, Egypt, Ecuador and Equatorial Guinea.
            3. Alexander Romanov 14 October 2015 15: 54 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              Quote: lelikas
              although, in our place, it would long ago have "included" a normal dry cargo ship in the fleet or something more abruptly from among civilians, and then would "withdraw" it back.

              Already entered one.
            4. Nick 17 October 2015 09: 20 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: lelikas
              775 Ave. - 13 pieces are taken, although, if we were our place, I would have long ago introduced a normal dry cargo ship or something more abruptly from the civilian fleet, and then brought it back.

              MO can just charter
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. GRAY 14 October 2015 13: 52 New
            • 9
            • 0
            +9
            Quote: avt
            That's just how much it, or rather, in what time frame, will be dragged by an old BDK ???

            "Alexander Tkachenko" can be put to business.
            1. Alexander Romanov 14 October 2015 15: 59 New
              • 14
              • 0
              +14
              Quote: GRAY
              "Alexander Tkachenko" can be put to business.

              He is already at work. Here he is passing the Bosphorus
          4. Manul 14 October 2015 14: 17 New
            • 8
            • 0
            +8
            Quote: avt
            That's just how much it, or rather, in what time frame, will be dragged by an old BDK ???

            Can't we rent the Mistral from Egypt? So for 30 years ..
            1. avt
              avt 14 October 2015 14: 24 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: Manul
              Can't we rent the Mistral from Egypt? So for 30 years ..

              We’ll wait and see, but the authorities have already cried out - God forbid we are resold.
              Quote: GRAY
              "Alexander Tkachenko" can be put to business.

              Quote: atalef
              The problem is that Turkey has the right to inspect civilian vessels when passing the Bosphorus.
              those. the ship must be uniquely military.

              request Something like this, of course, as military transport could be stocked, but not from Novorossiysk for sure.
              1. GRAY 14 October 2015 14: 28 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                Quote: avt
                Something like this, of course, as military transport could be stocked, but not from Novorossiysk for sure.

                “Alexander” has already been driven to Syria, accompanied naturally.
              2. lelikas 14 October 2015 14: 43 New
                • 5
                • 0
                +5
                In the order of delirium - "Sevmorput" - Everything will fit in there - both tanks and infantry fighting vehicles with armored personnel carriers;)
                It is clear that no one will do this, but I would love to look at him in a ball.
                1. Alexey RA 14 October 2015 17: 25 New
                  • 12
                  • 0
                  +12
                  Quote: lelikas
                  In the order of delirium - "Sevmorput" - Everything will fit in there - both tanks and infantry fighting vehicles with armored personnel carriers;)

                  And what a good option.
                  "You will interfere with the delivery of equipment to Syria on civilian ships - we will transfer the NSR to the Black Sea and will pass through the straits 4 times a month. Nuclear reactor through the center of Istanbul - there ... here ... there ... here ... here". laughing
              3. kamikaze 14 October 2015 21: 11 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                in Syria would put the sunshine Pinocchio would still be fine
                1. kamikaze 14 October 2015 21: 27 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  this car on bearded men igil will fry their beards
                2. Vadim237 14 October 2015 23: 07 New
                  • -1
                  • 0
                  -1
                  Солнцепёки и Буратины бесполезны против быстро маневрирующих малочисленных групп противника на джипах и в подземных укрытиях и тоннелях.
                  1. SIvan 15 October 2015 16: 17 New
                    • 3
                    • 0
                    +3
                    Quote: Vadim237
                    Sunshine and Pinocchio are useless against quickly maneuvering small enemy groups in jeeps and in underground shelters and tunnels.

                    Just in all tunnels and burrows, the thermobar works well, because gas is spreading. Or is it a delusion?
                    For example, in Jobar there were no civilians at all, only militants moving through tunnels.
                  2. Gogia 15 October 2015 21: 47 New
                    • 4
                    • 0
                    +4
                    На счет подземных укрытий зря. Как раз самое-то Там кислорода не остается и давление сильно падает в районе разрыва боеприпаса.
              4. Manul 15 October 2015 00: 14 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Quote: avt
                We’ll wait and see, but the authorities have already cried out - God forbid we are resold.

                That's just the point - for sure there is a clause on the non-resale of Russia in the contract with Egypt. And suddenly they forgot to say about the lease .. winked
                And why did you close up the cons, for the post I quote? what request I didn’t see anything terrible. Maybe it will fly to me now. belay
          5. Omskgasmyas 15 October 2015 11: 11 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            A flotilla of used bulk carriers is being bought - 8 pcs. Photos of the first were already online. Introduced into the auxiliary fleet of the Russian Navy and raised the flag. This is where the Syrian Express will be held. And the BDK will have a rest or will carry important loads.
        2. Pavel Vereshchagin 14 October 2015 13: 19 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          I agree, the Syrians need the equipment, without it it’s difficult to defeat the cutthroats, but there will be plenty of stinks from the American “partners”. Although we need to do this.
          1. vovanpain 14 October 2015 13: 28 New
            • 12
            • 0
            +12
            Quote: Pavel Vereshchagin
            I agree, the Syrians need the equipment, without it it’s difficult to defeat the cutthroats, but there will be plenty of stinks from the American “partners”. Although we need to do this.

            Yes, stink from them, and so won’t take so long, so what? The mongrels bark our caravan.
        3. prosto_rgb 14 October 2015 22: 52 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: vovanpain
          Need help, without technology Syrians will be hard

          Of course it is.
          Just one question.
          Where are the active protection systems?
          1. lelikas 15 October 2015 01: 06 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: prosto_rgb
            Where are the active protection systems?

            As they say, not for us, in Odessa - but where do we have active protection systems? The only car where it is nominally provided is the very one, Armata ....
        4. Semen Semyonitch 17 October 2015 11: 26 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: vovanpain
          Need help, without technology Syrians will be hard

          Who would have thought? what
      2. NEXUS 14 October 2015 14: 48 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: hedgehog in the fog
        in a good way, the technique will fall into the right hands soldier

        Tornadoes must also be sent to Alligators with the Night Hunters. And we’ll run around the technique and make an extra crap with the Ishilians.
    2. Tor5
      Tor5 14 October 2015 13: 16 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      A very reasonable and specific solution! And let the mattress dump "moderate in 50 tons.
      any g ... a.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. Michael easily 14 October 2015 13: 51 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          Such a "veiled" coordination - where the "load", there and "pour")
        2. abrakadabre 14 October 2015 15: 56 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          And in response to make an official thank you for such a designation. Depicting in all seriousness.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. Air Force captain 14 October 2015 13: 43 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Lord help them ... in the battle with the forces of evil in your name, accept the souls of the fallen and innocently killed in your kingdom of heaven, for You do not know the difference in the children of men, but judge them by their actions. Amen
      1. ASK505 14 October 2015 14: 49 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Hope for God, but do not make it yourself.
    5. marlin1203 14 October 2015 14: 48 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Good technology, good people! laughing
    6. Maxom75 14 October 2015 14: 52 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      So began the Russian Langlis to Syria. In exchange, it is necessary to demand an air force base, navy and shelf in extraterritorial control (i.e. for 250 years in the ownership of Russia, then we will return it).)))
      1. nail1972 15 October 2015 15: 46 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Soon we will have a rest on the beaches in Syria? wink
    7. Lord of the Sith 14 October 2015 16: 00 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Finally, we are constantly discussing with friends why they still haven’t sent a batch of T-72s.
    8. Serg 122 14 October 2015 18: 51 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      ... Let them ask Petra Porazhenko for advice ...

      This one will advise ... wassat
    9. kamikaze 14 October 2015 21: 34 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      с такой машиной можно превратить перемогу и ад игил
    10. Oleg552 16 October 2015 02: 38 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Do not believe those who say that quitting smoking in a week is impossible. There is a special and really working technique that will save you from this addiction in a few days, here https://dmitrinosov.blogspot.ru link Itself could not quit for a very long time, but this time it really happened.
  2. DMoroz 14 October 2015 13: 09 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    It is necessary to supply them with ground weapons, during the battles it really is not enough
  3. Frigate 14 October 2015 13: 10 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    But the problem is not only in tanks, but also in crews. Preparing a crew is more difficult than buying a tank.
    1. RUSIVAN 14 October 2015 13: 12 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      The Syrians are already familiar with this technique, there will be no problems, and if something, ours will help to figure it out ...
  4. RUSIVAN 14 October 2015 13: 10 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    This is very good, the Syrians really need technology.
    1. venaya 14 October 2015 13: 15 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: RUSIVAN
      This is very good, the Syrians really need technology.

      Finally, the real use of our military equipment. No wonder people worked, and now come in handy.
  5. made13 14 October 2015 13: 11 New
    • 9
    • 0
    +9
    Correctly. Let Russian technology recall its effectiveness. Sales will grow and the image of the country too good
  6. IAlex 14 October 2015 13: 11 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    She is not there yet ???
    1. kil 31 14 October 2015 13: 15 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      It seems that the BDK is loading 10 tanks. They need a lot, so you need to think about what other ships to supply them.
      1. IAlex 14 October 2015 13: 21 New
        • -4
        • 0
        -4
        Ну для того чтобы додуматься до поставок потребовалось 4-ре года, глядишь еще через четыре года догадаются как это все поставить...
  7. mQn
    mQn 14 October 2015 13: 12 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    I think this is from the reserves of canned food .....
  8. Engineer 14 October 2015 13: 13 New
    • -32
    • 0
    -32
    What trash is this ?! !!!! Where is the normal technique? Where is the T-90SM? Where is the BMP-3?
    1. BLACK-SHARK-64 14 October 2015 13: 17 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      do not rush bro everything in due time ... angry
    2. Dyatko Nebatko 14 October 2015 13: 20 New
      • 11
      • 0
      +11
      What they can use, they will receive it! I think that for free, because. in difficult times you need to help unselfishly! yes
      And the new ones will come in handy.
      1. Engineer 14 October 2015 13: 33 New
        • -21
        • 0
        -21
        The whole site laughed at the Saxons and Hamers decommissioned for Ukraine, while they themselves do the same with Syria and everyone is silent. That is what tanks mean are waiting for 500 anti-tank American complexes of the Tou Syrian opposition.
        1. Wedmak 14 October 2015 13: 40 New
          • 10
          • 0
          +10
          Well, it’s as if we were not written off. And probably from the warehouses. Again, cars are not tanks.
        2. Alexey RA 14 October 2015 13: 54 New
          • 15
          • 0
          +15
          Quote: Engineer
          The whole site laughed at the Saxons and Hamers decommissioned for Ukraine, while they themselves do the same with Syria and everyone is silent.

          And when did we manage to write off the T-72B and BMP-2? what
          Or do you think that our entire army has already been rearmament on the T-72B3 and BMP-3? There is none - the legacy of the USSR is still in order. Here is the news from 25.08.2015/XNUMX/XNUMX:
          An active phase has begun at the training ground of the Tsugol Eastern Military District during the joint Russian-Mongolian military training Selenga-2015, the press service of the Eastern Military District said.

          On Tuesday, August 25, the combined force grouping involved in the maneuvers completed the crossing of the Onon River section.

          During the practical phase of the training, the crews T-72B tanks, BMP-2 infantry fighting vehicles, armored personnel carriers BTR-80 crossed the water section of the river with a depth of about two and a half and a width of about 120 meters.

          So the Syrians will fight on the same technique that our fighters serve on.
          1. star44 14 October 2015 15: 51 New
            • 6
            • 0
            +6
            ... During the practical stage of the training, the crews of T-72B tanks, BMP-2 infantry fighting vehicles, BTR-80 armored personnel carriers overcame ...
            It’s more like crew co-ordination before a long business trip ... Like in an old joke: "... Well, man, move in, now we will show them ..." laughing But seriously - now the Syrians are not up to retraining for new equipment. It is necessary to free their land while the Russians help. There is not much time left ...
          2. The comment was deleted.
        3. Eugene-Eugene 14 October 2015 15: 10 New
          • 6
          • 0
          +6
          In any case, this is better than T-55, which can only be seen on fotovideo
    3. Alexey RA 14 October 2015 13: 30 New
      • 20
      • 0
      +20
      Quote: Engineer
      What trash is this ?! !!!! Where is the normal technique? Where is the T-90SM? Where is the BMP-3?

      Where in Syria are trained crews for all this?
      In addition, against the background of what Assad’s forces are fighting in Syria, the T-72B and BMP-2 are new.
    4. provincial 14 October 2015 13: 32 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      This must still be bought.
    5. Leks69Rus 14 October 2015 13: 35 New
      • -8
      • 0
      -8
      I think ours are afraid that they will destroy the Syrians with the latest technology. IMHO Assad troops are fighting disgustingly and such hands and Abrams burn well. What kind of tactics is it is to drive several tanks into the city without infantry and to naughty in all directions, while the militants calmly use this equipment from the tanks. It would be better, of course, to put the T-72b3, although they are again afraid of losses. I think these t72b are also modernized. Replacing the contact with contact 5 is easy to think.
      1. Wedmak 14 October 2015 13: 45 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Here is the time to deliver the B3 version. This is generally an economical version of B2. Compare the protection and understand everything.
    6. lopvlad 14 October 2015 14: 23 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Where is the T-90SM? Where is the BMP-3?

      then to learn how to use it for six months?
      1. sharp-lad 14 October 2015 20: 07 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        The reality is that training will really take up too much precious time, and the old, but combat-ready equipment, familiar to the Syrian fighters, will now be the best help! hi
  9. Awaz 14 October 2015 13: 19 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    то есть хохлы все же не уничтожили все запасы бронетехники )))) Хотя да , техника внешне не айс.Но для Сирии должна подойти . Экипажи на старье проще насобирать . Хотя несколько бы новеньких стоило бы откатать
    1. northern 14 October 2015 14: 44 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      And Ukrainians here what side? Appliances from the Russian Federation, throw substances.
      1. Awaz 14 October 2015 15: 59 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        ну как. Цензор читаем , там все написано. Все танки , вплодь до Арматы сожжены ...
        1. northern 14 October 2015 16: 52 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          well, here you are, sorry for hitting then.
          I just don’t go to garbage dumps, I'm afraid I’ll start puke on the monitor.
  10. WE ARE MAKING 14 October 2015 13: 20 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Friends must have! Friends need help!
    1. northern 14 October 2015 17: 02 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      No need to have friends, we are not US.
      Friends must be protected.
  11. TIO1969 14 October 2015 13: 21 New
    • 15
    • 0
    +15
    Для решения стоящих сейчас задач в Сирии, эти образцы техники оптимальны. Не надо микроскопом орехи колоть. И еще важный момент, готовность сирийской армии эксплуатировать именно эту технику. Действительно же, сама техника без экипажей ничего не стоит!
  12. ikshacooper 14 October 2015 13: 22 New
    • 13
    • 0
    +13
    Quote: Engineer
    What trash is this ?! !!!! Where is the normal technique? Where is the T-90SM? Where is the BMP-3?

    Maybe also “Almaty” with “Kurgan”?))) BMP-2 and T-72B is quite enough for the Syrian army, given the level of armament of the IS fighters, especially at no cost!
    1. Engineer 14 October 2015 13: 25 New
      • -32
      • 0
      -32
      Why not the T-34 then? That the Syrian army is not worthy of modern technology? Or do you think they are such savages that they can only fight on used technology 30 years ago?
      1. lelikas 14 October 2015 13: 32 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Quote: Engineer
        Why not the T-34 then? That the Syrian army is not worthy of modern technology? Or do you think they are such savages that they can only fight on used technology 30 years ago?

        Really ready to pay for them out of your pocket? Only honestly, discarding all reservations?
      2. Alexey RA 14 October 2015 13: 34 New
        • 16
        • 0
        +16
        Quote: Engineer
        Why not the T-34 then? That the Syrian army is not worthy of modern technology? Or do you think they are such savages that they can only fight on used technology 30 years ago?

        Syria did not previously have a BMP-3 or T-90. That is, there are no trained crews, no maintenance and repair specialists, no spare parts, no combat use experience (the same BMP-3, seduced by its 100th gun, can begin to be used as a light tank with predictable consequences).
        And most importantly - Syria now has no time for training. Technique is needed at the front, and this technique must be familiar.
        1. Seryoga DV 14 October 2015 13: 56 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          I'm wondering:
          72nd always went for export without a conveyor, while our conveyors stood at all
          Will these be with conveyors?
          on the assembly line, I think it’s not difficult to relearn
      3. Setrac 16 October 2015 09: 29 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: Engineer
        Why not the T-34 then? That the Syrian army is not worthy of modern technology? Or do you think they are such savages that they can only fight on used technology 30 years ago?

        ,, Do not savages ,, let themselves produce armored vehicles
      4. rc56 16 October 2015 14: 12 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: Engineer
        Why not the T-34 then? That the Syrian army is not worthy of modern technology? Or do you think they are such savages that they can only fight on used technology 30 years ago?


        T-34-85 all went to the same Syria in the summer of 1982.

        He himself saw how they removed from the URs and drove under their own power from Barabash to Slavyanka for loading. For an hour, on the side of the road with his auto club, he was sunbathing while the columns passed one after another.

        And these 34s were sent not because of greed, but precisely because of the speed of crew training. As they say, 72 matches then proved to be very good there. Only the crews were on them - all of our "instructors".
        .
  13. Wedmak 14 October 2015 13: 22 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    У правого танка на крышке инфракрасной "фары" милый такой череп нарисован. Не по уставу как-то, не? ))) А заднем плане БДК стоит. Таки "Сирийский экспресс" ожидает увеличение интенсивности ходок.
    1. northern 14 October 2015 17: 04 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Maybe the factory workers have fun, people too.
  14. demo 14 October 2015 13: 23 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    The Syrian army may soon receive the long-awaited Russian armored vehicles - T-72 and BMP-2, at least the accumulation of such equipment “in the characteristic Syrian camouflage” was recorded in one of the southern ports of Russia, the Vestnik Mordoviya agency writes.

    The humble Messenger of Mordovia did not name the glorious hero city of Novorossiysk.
    Syrians cool help.
  15. Krsk 14 October 2015 13: 24 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Ice is not ice but Surprise can arrange full-format
  16. VNP1958PVN 14 October 2015 13: 26 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    The ISIS will strongly regret that they are going to take the Russian Caucasus!
  17. chunga-changa 14 October 2015 13: 26 New
    • -18
    • 0
    -18
    And at whose expense is all this banquet? What and how does Assad give us?
    1. Dyatko Nebatko 14 October 2015 13: 27 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      Do not carry the blizzard! In difficult times they help unselfishly !!!
      1. Saratoga833 14 October 2015 14: 10 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Quote: Dyatko Nebatko
        In difficult times they help unselfishly !!!

        The Americans helped us during the Second World War not at all disinterestedly, but they are still proud that they defeated fascist Germany by “common efforts”. And about the fact that after the war we, with the destroyed economy, paid for this help - keep quiet!
        1. lelikas 15 October 2015 01: 14 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Saratoga833
          The Americans helped us during the Second World War not at all disinterestedly, but they are still proud that they defeated fascist Germany by “common efforts”. And about the fact that after the war we, with the destroyed economy, paid for this help - keep quiet!

          For the sake of justice - the equipment supplied by the Americans according to lend-lease - was free, as well as lost in the battles, the one that was left to itself after the war - was payable - they paid for it. The British are another matter - they managed to sell us their equipment, receiving in return American.
      2. chunga-changa 14 October 2015 14: 26 New
        • -3
        • 0
        -3
        In difficult times they help unselfishly !!!

        Selflessly, this means without profit - at cost. What you mean is called - for free. At whose expense is it free? Who helped us in hard times for free?
        1. abrakadabre 14 October 2015 16: 06 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          As citizen Woland said at Bulgakov: “fish can be only the first freshness, it can be the last. Second freshness means rotten” So it is with your games about free and disinterested help.
        2. Garris199 15 October 2015 01: 56 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Do not have a hundred rubles, but have a hundred friends (s). And a full-fledged, powerful base (with a penny rent or without it at all) in the Mediterranean region. Then we have these tanks (T-72b) in storage, at least ass. Chew, a few thousand for sure. But we haven’t riveted them for beauty, after all, right?
    2. Wedmak 14 October 2015 13: 30 New
      • 15
      • 0
      +15
      We will go on vacation there at a discount when everything is over. But seriously, what is the score toll ?? There, bearded men with Kalash run, people cut their throats. Another half a year, a year will come to our Caucasus. And America will give them some money and throw up weapons. What will you say then? "Why didn’t Assad help us then?"
      1. northern 14 October 2015 17: 08 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        It will whine, like all other liberals that Putin has completely lost.
    3. rc56 16 October 2015 14: 15 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: chunga-changa
      And at whose expense is all this banquet? What and how does Assad give us?


      The cradle of his army, which must grind bandyuk before they get to the UK and the SA.
  18. Starik72 14 October 2015 13: 27 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    This is the thing! And then the Shtatovites can be helped by scum-cutters, but that we can’t help Bashar Assad! It is necessary to deliver the equipment to the Syrians, but faster! Our air strikes are excellent, but mother’s fellow countryman also needs to be cleaned from these thugs-thugs, here tanks and armored personnel carriers come in handy, and other equipment will not hurt!
  19. Algetxnumx 14 October 2015 13: 28 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Everything is correct and understandable, we will help, we will help and help, but all the time there is one question that is waiting for so long, why it was allowed to bring such a situation, but there is no explanation for this question from anyone, nor from our government, nor from any kind of analysts, complete silence, but I would like to hear an intelligible answer.
    1. dsi
      dsi 14 October 2015 13: 54 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      but I would like to hear an intelligible answer.

      Are you in Russia or where. Take a look around, just figured out Georgia, Donbass was blazing at its side, again Crimea. We have just begun to declare ourselves as a worthy power, and you are such requirements. Therefore, analysts are silent because they see no reason to explain the obvious ...
    2. Seryoga DV 14 October 2015 14: 10 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      purely my opinion, they simply were not ready: everything themselves hung in the balance (a real war with NATO could begin over Crimea) and everything was more complicated with China. In addition, apparently, there was hope that after solving the problem of Obama’s red dashes, government forces would cope with the opposition themselves, and ISIS is a fairly recent Western invention.
      the crisis with Ukraine was (and remains) a pretty serious thing, since they began to rattle with nuclear weapons.
      perhaps it was important to solve the Iranian problem - my everyday foreboding of the war there was very strong
  20. bronik 14 October 2015 13: 32 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    The very case when presenting is cheaper for us. Around the pluses.
  21. The comment was deleted.
    1. ASK505 14 October 2015 14: 54 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Tell the enemy what you still saw there. Chatterbox is a godsend for the enemy.
    2. northern 14 October 2015 17: 11 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Are you talking about all the movements of military equipment in open sources?
  22. starriuy
    starriuy 14 October 2015 13: 38 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    I think they will quickly throw ....
  23. starriuy
    starriuy 14 October 2015 13: 41 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    How many flights
    1. Victorio 14 October 2015 21: 44 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      why put such things?
  24. kizhe 14 October 2015 13: 42 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Still to slow down the supply of US weapons and then generally ice.
  25. Mera joota 14 October 2015 13: 43 New
    • -5
    • 0
    -5
    "Business in Russian - they sold alcohol, drank the money .." Start a large-scale offensive on T-55/62, lose trained crews, and leave the supply of the best (than T-55/62) T-72 for later ... Like crews will they recruit new ones?
    1. Setrac 16 October 2015 09: 33 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Crews gained experience in the battles, while experienced crews won on any equipment.
  26. gukoyan 14 October 2015 13: 43 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    That's great!
    Just the guys are now on the offensive, and fresh tank injections will give their plus in the offensive and on the defensive.
  27. starriuy
    starriuy 14 October 2015 13: 44 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Just this year to Syria
  28. starriuy
    starriuy 14 October 2015 13: 45 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    And the very beginning
  29. katalonec2014 14 October 2015 13: 47 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Definitely good news, the equipment of the devastated country is just as needed, the Syrians will be grateful, since this is real help, consider humanitarian aid.
  30. LAB1959 14 October 2015 13: 49 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    Вопрос по типу танков должен рассматриваться под углом обученности сирийских танкистов и целям. Так как воевать с Абрамсами не предстоит, то Т-72 вполне подходит, так как пушка с Т-90 такая же и танк для сирийцев знакомый. А вот почему наши не ставят автоматическую защитную систему "Арена" (если не ошибаюсь в названии),то это уже другой вопрос. И систему прокачаем в боевой обстановку и людей спасем. Но не понятно почему не пошлют машины огневой поддержки " Терминатор" вот это уже совсем не понятно. Кроме этого не мешает и отправить "Ноны" может и "Вену", не понятно где новые САУ на базе миномета 120мм? Не ясно почему не вбросить новые бесшумные снайперки 12,7мм, как раз для городских боев - по стенам в полкирпича самое-то. Ратник для опыта нприменения и проверки бронестойкости, даже без систем связи и то будет хорошо. Испытать в бою необходимо всю новую технику, вспомните Испанию, где и И-16 и Т-26 дали опыт для создания новых самолётов и танков. А по стоимости танков можно сказать так, чем больше отдадим Т-72 старых образцов, тем больше будем иметь возможность обновить свой танковый парк и резерв.
    Кстати о платах, держать флот в море в три дорогого обходится, а после того как потеряли Ливийские и Югославские порты так вообще караул.
    1. Saratoga833 14 October 2015 14: 24 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      The Syrians need to fight here and now, and they will only be happy with the supplied weapons, especially since the equipment is familiar.
  31. Mama_Cholli 14 October 2015 13: 50 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    If lane-throwers throw ammunition from their planes to Ishilov’s aircraft, then why not help the Syrian army with the necessary machines?
  32. BOB044 14 October 2015 13: 58 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    A reasonable decision, it is necessary to strengthen those countries where our military bases will be.
    1. padded jacket 14 October 2015 14: 03 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      A very wise decision has long said it is necessary to arm Syria, Iraq, Hezbollah and Iran to help advisers and technical experts and let them destroy the terrorists.
  33. Goldmitro 14 October 2015 14: 03 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Quote: chunga-changa
    And at whose expense is all this banquet? What and how does Assad give us?

    He gives the lives of Syrian soldiers who have been grinding all jihadist scum from all over the world for 4 years in Syria, including from our republics of the Caucasus, where they can return if ISIS triumphs!
  34. Ustyuzhanin-35 14 October 2015 14: 18 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Technology is ours, soldiers are yours. The only way!
  35. starriuy
    starriuy 14 October 2015 14: 21 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    And here is more significant news. In Murmansk the other day, hastily curtailed, lasting only four months - unimaginably small for such a huge ship! - repair of our only aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov. Next week, he will already embark on the Severomorsk raid, at the end of October he will receive the aircraft of the 279th separate naval fighter regiment of the Northern Fleet. And then it will go to the Barents Sea to provide training flights.

    The rush for our naval reality is simply unimaginable. After all, usually even ships of much smaller sizes and combat capabilities, after being repaired for months, have been in bases. Replenish supplies and conduct naval exercises. Checkers of all ranks do not come off their decks. Of the crews, the headquarters of the rope twist, establishing a combat organization. Then - gradual completion of course tasks.

    And then from the factory wall - and immediately to the sea? This happens only in urgent circumstances.
    Information from the Rusnext site ...
    1. starriuy
      starriuy 14 October 2015 14: 28 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      What is it for ?....
  36. Izotovp 14 October 2015 14: 42 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    We need self-propelled guns, mortars and RPO.
    1. ASK505 14 October 2015 14: 57 New
      • -2
      • 0
      -2
      Make a complete list of the necessary weapons for Syria and run to the General Staff.
      1. Izotovp 14 October 2015 15: 42 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        This is a thought !! Only to run far away, it is easier for a classmate to write there)))
  37. Dima Čalevo 14 October 2015 14: 50 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    It is high time, in Russia this good in bulk in storage, and will help the Syrians. In the last video, from there the tanks are completely T-62 and T-55 lined with sandbags, well, this tin is already completely ..
  38. nazar_0753 14 October 2015 15: 18 New
    • -2
    • 0
    -2
    Nice to see the Novorossiysk Mountains in the background
  39. TOR2 14 October 2015 15: 41 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    As for the T-72B tanks, they have dynamic protection, which is able to neutralize the cumulative ammunition.
    There, in addition to dynamic protection, the campaign will soon need the “Curtain" too.
  40. Sasha75 14 October 2015 16: 32 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Ну, так для справки. Т 34-85 в Сирии воюют два точно отбивали атаку на авиабазу им помогала СУ-100 образца 1944г боезапас был небольшой, так что расстреляли его машины бросили и их судьба не известна. И кто так уверен, что там воюют только новым оружием нам показывают боеспособные части и там одно старьё да это всё самое лучшее что осталось и т55 это то, что осталось и там нужна техника хоть какая, если мы туда всё своё старьё скинем что на утилизацию накопилось и этому рады будут. Уже проскакивают винтовки Мосина в снайперском варианте. А так что там за оружие как с двух сторон воюют старым и проверенным и дешёвым а несколько видео о применении противотанковых комплексов это пиар кто не помнит, напомню американцы за сколько десятков тысяч зелёных в Афганистане выкупала неиспользованные Стингеры скоро будем смотреть повтор выкуп всего того что туда накидали если продадут обратно.
    Add a photo than they are fighting.
    1. the47th 16 October 2015 18: 39 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      The mosquito is now quite currently sold in stores. Until the "junk" she is far away.
  41. Sasha75 14 October 2015 16: 35 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Who did not understand Degtyarev.
  42. Sasha75 14 October 2015 16: 36 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Also not new.
    1. Dima Čalevo 14 October 2015 23: 08 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      And what's that? czech bran
      1. just exp 15 October 2015 20: 57 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        but Czech? not aglitsky?
  43. Sasha75 14 October 2015 16: 38 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    And this place at the auction will be very expensive.
  44. Sasha75 14 October 2015 16: 39 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Although there it is not a rarity.
  45. Sasha75 14 October 2015 16: 46 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Not Syria, but in those parts.
  46. Sasha75 14 October 2015 16: 47 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Not Syria, but in those parts ..
    1. vkfriendly 16 October 2015 14: 27 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      with what fright, the Syrian flag in the distance
  47. Sasha75 14 October 2015 16: 48 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Not Syria, but in those parts ...
  48. voyaka uh 14 October 2015 16: 52 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    T-72 tanks are suitable for Syrians. They are used to them.
    А вот хватит ли грамотных танкистов? Почти все танкисты - алавиты.
    They are loyal to the president, but recruits are often peasants - teach them
    technology is not fast.
    1. stonks 14 October 2015 17: 22 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      The same first thought: "And the crews ???"
    2. sharp-lad 14 October 2015 20: 13 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      But still, the T72B is not the T90 in the latest versions, in addition, there are still enough Syrian tankers able to train new crews.
    3. Astrahanec 15 October 2015 18: 20 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      There was a conversation about Cuban tankers. Maybe not a duck?
  49. GDV
    GDV 14 October 2015 19: 55 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    And more bumblebees and bumblebees ... a lot of bumblebees, back oil.
    1. Awaz 14 October 2015 20: 33 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      типо теперь Шмели не мед носят а нефть ))))
  50. Awaz 14 October 2015 20: 35 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Арабы чо то пишут про танки турецкие в Сирии... Они там совсем что ли уху ели ... ы с Турками потеряли рамсы совсем. Провоцируют же реально серьезный конфликт . Какого лезут ( если это правда) в зону где ВКС РФ ровняют бандитов.