The White House: Coalition plans have not changed due to the actions of the Russian Federation in Syria

A spokesman for the White House, Josh Ernest, said that the plans of the international coalition led by the United States did not change and were not reduced due to the actions of the Russian Federation in Syria.

“We are still focused on discussions at a practical, operational level in order to make the environment for our pilots conducting operations in the sky over Syria at least a little safer and to ensure that Russian actions do not prevent the continuation of our operations. So far, there was no need for the United States or our coalition partners to reduce our operations in any way because of what Russia is doing now in Syria, ”RIA "News".

Ernest noted that the Russian and American side held two video conferences on the Syrian issue and are planning new ones.

“The President (US Barack Obama) made it clear that the conflict in Syria will not turn into a“ war by proxy ”between the US and Russia. This is a firm commitment that our president accepted, and we will abide by it, ”he said.

Ernest reiterated the White House’s position that the United States supports the “constructive contribution” of the Russian Federation to the fight against the terrorist group “Islamic State”, although they still don’t see such a “constructive contribution”.

“But we are open to this. We would welcome a shift in their (Russia) strategy that would allow them to realize the goal that they, in their own words, set for themselves. We think that multilateral efforts will be more effective than unilateral actions by countries such as Russia, ”Ernest concluded.

Comments

[Uncle lee]

until they see such a “constructive contribution”. Yes, they do not see beyond their own nose!

[Motherland Russia]

They all see ...
They just do it purposefully.
Like children, "pussy is measured."

[Kostyar]

multilateral efforts will be more effective than the unilateral actions of countries such as Russia, ”Ernest concluded.

What the hell is PROVISIONAL hints of what such countries .... and ???
With such countries as yours, God forgive us, USA (mustache), it’s a sin to say hello to us in Russia !!!

[Finches]

White House spokeswoman Josh Ernest said the plans for an international coalition led by the United States have not changed ... and added to himself:"And there weren't any plans!"

[DIVAN SOLDIER]

I still don’t understand why ours didn’t squeeze them out from Syria, they fly quietly and dump the cargo of Ishilov’s.

[MIKHALYCH1]

Something the USA got nervous ...! Is Iran going to fight their "ISIS fosterlings"? Well then, everything is clear .. Dare, gentlemen, but we have our own coalition formed on the BV!

[Vend]

Coalition plans have not changed due to Russian actions in Syria

So ours will destroy ISIS, and the Western coalition of ISIS to support and protect. All clear.

[marlin1203]

The rhinoceros is large, very dangerous and has very poor eyesight ... but this is not his problem ...

[Leviton]

They don’t see theirs ... very bad with eyesight

[dr.star75]

“They don’t see their own ... very badly with vision” no, the belly interferes.

[vovanpain]

Of course they have not changed, bombing excavators, hospitals and weddings, but not terrorists.

[Alexander 3]

They will still bomb empty nightmares in the desert.

[rotmistr60]

Coalition plans have not changed due to Russian actions in Syria

Well, of course they have not changed. Fight against the IG do not care, the main thing is to overthrow (not dismiss) B. Assad. And then even the grass does not grow. The main thing - the American said, the American did.

[Russia]

Ernest reiterated the position of the White House that the USA support a “constructive contribution” RF in the fight against the Islamic State terrorist group, although they still don’t see such a “constructive contribution”»

What are they talking about?
Gopher again?
Right K. Lavrov !!!

[Denis DV]

Where is the world heading? Yes, the average intestine provides more objective information about US activities.

[Reserve buildbat]

“But we are open to this. We would welcome a shift in their (Russia) strategy that would allow them to realize the goal that they, in their own words, set for themselves. We think that multilateral efforts will be more effective than unilateral actions by countries such as Russia, ”Ernest concluded.

From which we conclude: the Russian Aerospace Forces should not bomb terrorists, but excavators, hospitals and weddings. It will be more effective, according to Ernest.

GENITALLY !!!

[79807420129]

Quote: stock buildbat

“But we are open to this. We would welcome a shift in their (Russia) strategy that would allow them to realize the goal that they, in their own words, set for themselves. We think that multilateral efforts will be more effective than unilateral actions by countries such as Russia, ”Ernest concluded.

From which we conclude: the Russian Aerospace Forces should not bomb terrorists, but excavators, hospitals and weddings. It will be more effective, according to Ernest.

GENITALLY !!!

And then to hang on Russia all those shoals that they themselves did.

[dr.star75]

But Russia’s plans changed! They began to bomb more often.

[Mountain shooter]

What was he supposed to say? That the Russians really "closed the sky" for the minke whales, and now they fly carefully and with a look when ours are not around? To do this, you must first resign, and he has a mortgage, and the children are at Harvard ...

[Dezinto]

Coalition plans have not changed due to the actions of the Russian Federation

But in the world of geopolitics, in the arrangement of chess on the board - much has changed!

[Shooting]

The whole situation in the world clearly reflects the victory of strategic thinking over tactical.

They returned Crimea - the west is taken aback and begins to take hasty decisions (sanctions, etc.) just to give an answer to Russia.
A volley in Syria - the west is generally in shock, no decisions are already visible, just throwing and blah blah blah without action.

But all these are our tactical tasks. And the West is completely bogged down in confrontation with us to resolve these tasks.

After our next step, it seems to me that the West will simply turn out to be an extras in world geopolitics.

Yes, all our steps have been taken in the military sphere, but they will certainly also be in the economic sphere.

[pvv113]

A spokesman for the White House, Josh Ernest, said that the plans of the international coalition led by the United States did not change and were not reduced due to the actions of the Russian Federation in Syria.

As the desert was bombed, they will continue to bomb. As ISIS was fed, they will continue

[gukoyan]

Do not the plans change? Hmmmm, again they will just fly, bomb hospitals and tractors? And yell that we are in opposition to bomb ...

[N-SKiy]

By putting a plus on the article, as I understand it, do you support it? And we agree with the words of Chenomazov * We will not mind if Russia shares with us the burden of responsibility for the war with IS "speech at the UN.

[roskot]

He himself understood what he said - We would welcome the change of their (Russia) strategy, which would allow them to realize that goal.
We will also welcome a change in your strategy if you leave the long-suffering Syrian land. And we are not alone ...

[Lelek]

Ernest reiterated the White House’s position that the United States supports the “constructive contribution” of the Russian Federation to the fight against the terrorist group “Islamic State”, although they still don’t see such a “constructive contribution”.

How shoud I understand this? There is a constructive contribution, but the Americans DO NOT SEE it. Nihuse phrase, match Vitalik Klitschko. It is likely that the system worked, America needs to be rebooted (IMHO fix 0x80070005).

[Wolka]

there is never a lot of money, especially in a war, and our task in Syria now is to remain at our expenses so that the Yankees and their coalition spend as much as possible with invariably zero results, so that they run out financially faster, and the subsequent result does not take long. .

[vladimirw]

We think that multilateral efforts will be more effective than the unilateral actions of countries such as Russia, ”Ernest concluded.
And we think that you don’t think shit, our President told you this at the UN Assembly

[boris-1230]

Russia began to fight, so the ISIS fled, and so far they have only expanded their territory of influence despite the "effective" NATO operation. We would be silent, we saw how NATO members are fighting in Serbia and Iraq.

[Steppe]

Do Americans seriously think they will be believed? Believe that they will not take aggressive action and wage war against Russia? Are we children? Is it possible to believe those who still have not said a word of truth? I think they will wage a war against us. And precisely by the wrong hands. In any case, in Syria.