The Russian military handed over to the American side their proposals on the safety of flights in the sky of Syria

The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation prepared and transmitted to the Pentagon its proposals on a flight safety agreement in Syria, which may be concluded between the parties, transfers RIA News message of the Russian department.




“Fulfilling the agreements reached during the video conference held on October 10, 2015, the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation prepared proposals for filling out the text of a possible Russian-American agreement on ensuring flight safety aviation during operations in the airspace of Syria ", - said in a release.

It is reported that the draft document was transmitted on Tuesday.

The press service added that "Russian specialists are ready to hold the next 14 video conference on October 2015 of the year."
Photos used:
RIA News. Ada Baguian
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. svetoruss 14 October 2015 09: 22 New
    • 11
    • 0
    +11
    The essence of the proposal: - Fly away.
    1. marlin1203 14 October 2015 09: 24 New
      • 15
      • 0
      +15
      "We will not beat on take-off. Maestro" laughing
      1. vovanpain 14 October 2015 09: 27 New
        • 15
        • 0
        +15
        Satisfied with the ruins of the Pentagon. Maestro lol
        1. Batia 14 October 2015 10: 20 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Not the topic, but sad. In Kiev, on the road going down to the Dnieper stood a bronze monument to the Maestro. He was demolished by the Maidan.
          1. Uncle lee 14 October 2015 10: 31 New
            • 6
            • 0
            +6
            Quote: Batia
            He was demolished by the Maidan.

            Because they are even afraid of monuments. A living Maestro would kick their ass!
      2. shibi 14 October 2015 09: 29 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        I won’t beat ... I’ll shake it!
    2. Finches 14 October 2015 09: 26 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      But who is there to talk to in this Pentagon? There are already civilians, pederasts and women ... Warriors! Like Serdyukov, whose whole military thought was in the phrase:"And let's bomb this bridge too!" laughing
      1. Kostyar 14 October 2015 09: 30 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        The United States is demanding guarantees that the Russian aerospace forces will not bring down their Hercules with humanitarian aid for moderate terrorists.

        Of course, we will not shoot down, they themselves will fall on terrorists with "humanitarian" loads of explosives ...
      2. MIKHALYCH1 14 October 2015 09: 36 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        I think this proposal .... Do not stick your nose where gentlemen do not ask! Otherwise ...
  2. A-Sim 14 October 2015 09: 23 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    "Our answer to McCain."
    1. Turbo rabbit 14 October 2015 09: 25 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      This poor fellow can’t forget the Vietnamese pit. Here, at the word "Russia" and tears his fart.
    2. Mowgli 14 October 2015 09: 29 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: A-Sim
      "Our answer to McCain."


      And Rat Christie from previous news.
  3. Turbo rabbit 14 October 2015 09: 24 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Strange they require flight safety. They really think that we have pilots like ours, can they confuse a hospital with terrorists? Are they apparently afraid that their planes will be confused with the ISIS?
    1. ltc22A 14 October 2015 10: 03 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Turbo-Rabbit
      Strange they require flight safety. They really think that we have pilots like ours, can they confuse a hospital with terrorists? Are they apparently afraid that their planes will be confused with the ISIS?

      Question of the day: And why should the Russian Defense Ministry agree with the Pentagon on flight safety? Our VKS forces are located in Syria and fly at the request of the President and Government of Syria. WHAT do American planes do there? Who called them there?
      Is ISIS having airplanes?
  4. raid14 14 October 2015 09: 27 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    The United States is demanding guarantees that the Russian aerospace forces will not bring down their Hercules with humanitarian aid for moderate terrorists.
    1. vorobey 14 October 2015 09: 32 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: raid14
      The United States is demanding guarantees that the Russian aerospace forces will not bring down their Hercules with humanitarian aid for moderate terrorists.


      it is necessary to give guarantees ... we will bomb loads of pickers ...
      1. veksha50 14 October 2015 10: 08 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: vorobey
        . we will bomb the loads of pickers ...



        Um ... so - the costs are more ... it is easier for the transporter to "land" ... One will "sit down" - the other will think about it ...

        PS It is only necessary that these transporters bring down the Syrian Air Force ... The masters of the sky, so to speak ... Well, they have every right to do so ...

        And our VKS at this time, let them be covered from the attack of fighters of the "coalition" ...
        1. vorobey 14 October 2015 10: 24 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: veksha50
          Um ... so - the costs are more ...


          in the next topic like that ...


           vorobey (2) SU  Today, 09:43 ↑



          Quote: Good I

          Maybe so ... But there have been no statements, neither from our side, nor from the United States, nor from terrorists, either that our air forces or air forces of the SAR have dealt a blow to the place of discharge ...


          and why should the bombing place be dumped ... why should partners upset the bomb, it’s necessary to dig where the rat drags it all ... they pick up a person 4-5 on pickups, and then all this needs to be concentrated and distributed

          they give us target designation ... DB (Lavrov S.V.)
          1. veksha50 14 October 2015 11: 03 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: vorobey
            they give us target designation ... DB (Lavrov S.V.)


            Why give it ... Washington-White House-Pentagon-Langley ... And no more ...
  5. rf xnumx 14 October 2015 09: 27 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    The Russian military handed over to the American side their proposals on the safety of flights in the sky of Syria
  6. venaya 14 October 2015 09: 28 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    We spent a myriad of money and American blood to destroy the USSR. We must not let him return

    In russians spring it is reported that candidates in the presidential race are afraid of the revival of the USSR, some offer to bomb the Russians in Syria.
    1. veksha50 14 October 2015 10: 13 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: venaya
      Candidates for the presidential race are afraid of a revival of the USSR, some suggest bombing Russians in Syria.



      They do what they fear correctly ...

      Well, as for the Russian bombing in Syria ... Putin set Shoigu's task to increase the grouping by another 60 aircraft ... If this option succeeds, then a "coalition of 65 countries" should be thoughtful ...

      PS There are already speculations about the closure of the Bosphorus by Turkey ... Wouldn’t it be better to start driving the “express trains” from our North? Although bypassing, though for a long time, however, no one will block ... And be sure to give a cover to the "express", both underwater and air ... Let Tu-95 and Tu-160 routes run somewhere nearby. .
  7. asadov 14 October 2015 09: 30 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    There is only one suggestion - do not waste fuel, just sit and watch how our business is doing.
  8. Decathlon 14 October 2015 09: 31 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    "safety agreement"
    In short: “we are flying - you are sitting”, “we are sitting - and you are sitting” Somehow, probably ?!
  9. rotmistr60 14 October 2015 09: 34 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Ours once again show their openness and interest in cooperation. And in response, the frantic statements of American politicians in the United States, bordering on black insanity.
  10. russmensch 14 October 2015 09: 48 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Well, why not give guarantees - yes, please fly. But first, please be kind enough to provide flight routes and the coordinates of the drop point. What is this? At the same time, we will see where the moderate and where not the moderate ...
  11. sl22277 14 October 2015 09: 50 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The President of Russia recently voiced a response from Washington regarding the goals of where Russian Aviation operates. If you think that we do not strike where we need it, then tell me: Where should I bomb? The answer was: We are not ready for this. Then say: Where do not bomb? The answer was: We are not ready for this.
    Then what are you blaming us for ?! Generally no answer ....
  12. kill the fascist 14 October 2015 09: 52 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    the suggestions are simple, I think, fly here, don’t pop into this one, and yet - they saw a RF plane on the radar bring down quickly.
  13. MATROSKIN-53 14 October 2015 09: 53 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The essence of the sentence: Americans, do not stick your nose where the dog does not shit ...
  14. veksha50 14 October 2015 10: 05 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    "The Russian military handed over to the American side their proposals on the safety of flights in the sky of Syria"...

    Honestly, I don’t understand these Chinese ceremonies in any way ...

    In the airspace of Syria, the owners, according to international and domestic law, are the Air Force of Siri ...

    Russian Aerospace Forces operate at the invitation of the legitimate government of Syria ...

    But aviation of the so-called coalition without any UN Security Council resolution, without the request and permission of the Syrian government, easily invades the airspace of an independent country, bombing someone on its territory, and behaves like a robber and a robber ...

    So I have a question - why do we need to agree with the robber on which side of the road to go, so as not to disturb him ???
  15. roskot 14 October 2015 10: 09 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Yes, I did not shoot down your planes. But stay away.
  16. MIKHALYCH1 14 October 2015 10: 10 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Many of us played as “Indians” as a child .... And Chingachgook “Apt Eye” now lives and acts in everyone’s soul ... (for pilots and designers for sure))))
  17. Steppe 14 October 2015 12: 18 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I suggest the following. We will not bomb, but we will land and check. If you carry only food and toilet paper - fly on. If the weapon - we take everything away, and the pilot is delayed until the circumstances are clarified. Destroy food - suddenly poisoned. If the landing pilot hurries to dump the cargo, we destroy the dumped cargo, we land and check the pilot. If the pilot does not want to land for verification, we bring down the plane along with the pilot.
  18. iouris 14 October 2015 13: 37 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    If it is impossible to close the airspace over Syria from the forces of the "coalition", this means that they will soon have to leave.