New York Times: Syrian opposition appealed to the United States with a request to put anti-aircraft weapons

The New York Times published material stating that after the start of the Russian operation aviation on the territory of Syria from the command of opposition groups began to receive reports on the supply of larger batches of American arms, in particular, anti-tank weapons.




“We receive what we ask for in a short time,” one of the RIA reports "News".

It is also noted that the first deliveries of TOW anti-tank missile systems took place back in 2013 during the secret program of Saudi Arabia, the United States and allied countries. The rebels themselves say that in 2013, the Saudi authorities bought more than 13 thousands of weapons from the United States. And the CIA is responsible for the operation, not the Pentagon, which last week curtailed a program of combat training for Syrian opposition members. At the moment, arms shipments have increased significantly.

“We can get as much as we need and when we need it.” You just need to specify the required number, ”said a representative of one of the groupings, assuming that the main reason for this is intervention in the Russian conflict.

According to the publication, in the near future, the Syrian conflict could turn into a mediated war between the United States and the Russian Federation.

The material also emphasizes that the Syrian opposition members need anti-aircraft weapons to fight government and Russian aviation. In particular, they transmitted a similar request ten days ago through the operations center in Turkey, but for the time being, Washington fears that weapons may fall into the hands of terrorists.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

70 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. saniajan 14 October 2015 06: 47 New
    • 46
    • 0
    +46
    Read - ISIS turned to the United States ... And they will deliver, the nannies of terrorism
    1. INVESTOR 14 October 2015 06: 51 New
      • 31
      • 0
      +31
      If you put MANPADS, you need to defiantly fill them with a couple of American-style civilian aircraft, and throw the used MANPADS into position.
      1. Zoldat_A 14 October 2015 07: 42 New
        • 31
        • 0
        +31
        Quote: INVESTOR
        If you put MANPADS, you need to defiantly fill them with a couple of American-style civilian aircraft, and throw the used MANPADS into position.

        Such a direct provocation is the life credo of the USA, the country of self-arrows and provocations. AND we always behave like pupils of the Institute of Noble Maidens in a port tavern - we all hope for their decency. It never was, never will be!

        Sorry, why do the opposition use anti-aircraft weapons? ISIS has bombers? Or are Ashton Carter’s "grandfather covenants" beginning to come true? You need to directly ask the United States - whose planes do they want to bring down the hands of the "opposition"? So that all illusions are dispelled. "Gauges" and enough for them ...

        Counter proposal - IN THE CASE of the US opposition’s air defense missile systems - to give Assad some tactical nuclear weapons. He will find where to crave them.
        1. Semen Semyonitch 14 October 2015 07: 56 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          Quote: Zoldat_A
          Sorry, why do the opposition use anti-aircraft weapons?

          Sorry, is there an opposition? laughing
          1. Zoldat_A 14 October 2015 08: 11 New
            • 14
            • 0
            +14
            Quote: Semen Semenych
            Sorry, is there an opposition?

            I do not like the answers to the question, but in this case - it’s exceptionally correct! good

            Opposition in Syria is the same myth as the "guilt" of bin Laden in world terrorism in general and in the explosion of towers on September 11 - in particular. The same myth as the assassination of Kennedy by the unsung Oswald. Like Pearl Harbor, the Gulf of Tonkin, the cruiser Maine, the civil war for the liberation of blacks ... The United States is the country of the Great Samostrel.

            During perestroika, one of the satirists blurted out that the USSR was creating problems for itself, and then heroically overcoming them. The United States makes money by creating problems for the rest of the world. Tired of this sluggish schizophrenia, lasting from Fulton! Already a war - so a war! One hell - over the Reichstag or over the Capitol Raise the Banner of Victory ....
        2. just exp 14 October 2015 09: 04 New
          • 8
          • 0
          +8
          Assad will not crave nuclear fuel anywhere, this is the territory of HIS country, it is necessary to protect it, and not poison it.
          and here is a hint that Strela-S will get into Afghanistan (just in case with a bookmark by date, so that they wouldn’t work after six months or a year) and hto knows how he flies, the chinook is gray-winged, the apache is young.
          1. Zoldat_A 14 October 2015 10: 42 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            Quote: just EXPL
            hint that Arrows-S will get to Afghanistan (just in case, with a bookmark by date, so that they wouldn’t work after six months or a year) and hto knows how he flies, the chinook is gray-winged, the Apache is young.

            But this is nishtyak - they are with their own ragged rag to them and according to the hare. good Moderate opposition, I think, if you look, we will find there ...
        3. INVESTOR 14 October 2015 09: 25 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Quote: Zoldat_A
          Quote: INVESTOR
          If you put MANPADS, you need to defiantly fill them with a couple of American-style civilian aircraft, and throw the used MANPADS into position.

          Such a direct provocation is the life credo of the USA, the country of self-arrows and provocations. AND we always behave like pupils of the Institute of Noble Maidens in a port tavern - we all hope for their decency. It never was, never will be!

          Sorry, why do the opposition use anti-aircraft weapons? ISIS has bombers? Or are Ashton Carter’s "grandfather covenants" beginning to come true? You need to directly ask the United States - whose planes do they want to bring down the hands of the "opposition"? So that all illusions are dispelled. "Gauges" and enough for them ...

          Counter proposal - IN THE CASE of the US opposition’s air defense missile systems - to give Assad some tactical nuclear weapons. He will find where to crave them.


          Yes We Rat! To live with wolves howl like a wolf !!!
    2. vovanpain 14 October 2015 06: 52 New
      • 22
      • 0
      +22
      Quote: sanyadzhan
      Read - ISIS turned to the United States ... And they will deliver, the nannies of terrorism

      Yes, most likely the striped ones themselves create a fuss that would push the shaitanam pzrk
      1. Beaver 14 October 2015 07: 19 New
        • 11
        • 0
        +11
        "Mom, we're all crazy." wassat
        Stripes deliver weapons to terrorists while
        Washington fears arms could fall into terrorist hands
    3. Andrea 14 October 2015 06: 53 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      Quote: sanyadzhan

      Read - ISIS turned to the United States ... And they will deliver, the nannies of terrorism
      Well, everything p.ipets "moderate"!
      One has only to fart in the direction of our aviation, we will discard noodles through them. laughing
    4. fa2998 14 October 2015 06: 54 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      Quote: sanyadzhan
      Read - ISIS turned to the United States ... And they will deliver, the nannies of terrorism

      But we already went through this. We are in Afghanistan, the United States aviation, “Stingers” to the bearded men! Although, from high stands, “we fight terrorism”. I’m thinking of a couple of skyscrapers with planes to demolish, we can change our minds!
      1. EvgNik 14 October 2015 07: 09 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Quote: fa2998
        I think a couple of skyscrapers to demolish by airplanes, we can change our minds

        It is a pity the Pentagon did not get there. But: Carthage ... ugh, Washington must be destroyed.
        1. AndreyS 14 October 2015 07: 50 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Quote: EvgNik
          It is a pity the Pentagon did not get there.

          So there is no pentagon, but Langley needs to be demolished! And all its branches!
          1. abrakadabre 14 October 2015 11: 28 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            There EVERYTHING needs to be demolished. Both the Pentagon and Langley.
        2. abrakadabre 14 October 2015 11: 27 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          And reclaimed to its original state.
    5. kodxnumx 14 October 2015 07: 22 New
      • 10
      • 0
      +10
      What is stopping Russia from destroying the thrown weapon to the militants together with the terrorists who will come to pick it up, because ours are seen on coin holders where the United States and its allies are dumping the cargo, you just need to wait for those who come for him!
    6. Starover_Z 14 October 2015 07: 38 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      According to the publication, in the near future, the Syrian conflict could turn into a mediated war between the United States and the Russian Federation.

      I just thought that in this case Syria would turn into Vietnam-2!
      1. sa-ag 14 October 2015 08: 42 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Starover_Z
        I just thought that in this case Syria would turn into Vietnam-2!

        No, there was an ideological confrontation
    7. Dreiko11 14 October 2015 07: 44 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Americans through Syrian aplasia arm ISIS
    8. UralMan 14 October 2015 08: 47 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: sanyadzhan
      Read - ISIS turned to the United States ... And they will deliver, the nannies of terrorism

      After all, they will definitely put ... Then wait for the second Vietnam ...
      There will be a lot of trouble ... our pilots have itched their hands for a long time to kick the Yankees' ass and comb their scallops
    9. marlin1203 14 October 2015 09: 40 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Most likely they won’t. If you would like to have delivered. And so this is tantamount to declaring war on us.
    10. Max_Bauder 14 October 2015 09: 43 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: sanyadzhan
      Read - ISIS turned to the USA ..


      removed from the language

      Quote: sanyadzhan
      And they’ll deliver, the nannies of terrorism


      it is necessary to capture a sample and prove to the united nations that the igil is supported, introduce a no-fly zone for them as a sanction. And where these anti-aircraft guns will level everything along the perimeter of the kilometer with the ground without making close fire contact.
      1. your1970 14 October 2015 11: 39 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Something life-giving-napalm there or thermobaric kilometers so with 5 ....
  2. carabiner sks 14 October 2015 06: 51 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Afghan situation threatens to recur ...
    1. Andrey Yuryevich 14 October 2015 07: 18 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      Vietnam, Afghanistan ... everything is as old as the world, history is developing in a spiral. what's next? Syrian pilots with Russian names will bring down the staff? or are they still afraid to go to the lists?
      1. Zoldat_A 14 October 2015 07: 49 New
        • 10
        • 0
        +10
        Quote: Andrew Y.
        Vietnam, Afghanistan ... everything is as old as the world, history is developing in a spiral. what's next? Syrian pilots with Russian names will bring down the staff? or are they still afraid to go to the lists?

        Vietnam was a long time ago, they don’t remember it ... McCain alone - and then only Freud will unearth memories. And in Afghanistan they did not fly. I think the situation will go, as with the “Stingers”. It remains only to hope that our "commanders-in-chief" will find, as the GDP put it, "an adequate response to inadequate actions."

        А pay attention to how much America’s mind has fallen from Afghanistan - then even though the Stingers were quietly sending, it was smart enough not to talk about it to the whole world. And now Nuremberg’s own people are "raising the floor."
  3. Ural resident 14 October 2015 06: 52 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    It is not in vain that consultations are underway with the states - for sure, there will be some kind of agreement on MANPADS, although they will spoil these spoilers in full - such is their soul. Not yourself, so through the Saudis they will begin to deliver. I hope that our options have been calculated, and they will have time to crush the Dushmans before they get anything.
    1. Zoldat_A 14 October 2015 07: 57 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: A resident of the Urals
      Not themselves, so through the Saudis they will begin to deliver.

      Here, in VO, one from the Donbass wrote that the United States is supplying 12,7mm Barrett M82 to the ukrovok via Bulgaria. And nothing, everyone is silent.

      Let the Yankees deliver what they want and to whom they want! What are they afraid of, or what?!? Only then do we need to remove ALL moral restrictions from ourselves. War is war. We never wanted a war, but we were never afraid to fight. And in the USA, probably, too few “plastics” come from Iraq and Afghanistan.
  4. sl22277 14 October 2015 06: 56 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    I think until the rise of terrorism in the United States will be supported, to put it mildly, "Opposition." In any war, the United States is doing everything possible and impossible to delay its end. America is not fighting in order to win, but in order to fight. It's very simple: the American oligarchy makes money from war.
  5. Decathlon 14 October 2015 07: 00 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    That is, according to the logic (or rather, the lack thereof) of the USA, the explosions of the twin towers are the work of only oppositionists ?! Then the hell was the whole world to declare that they are declaring war on terrorism ?! The "exceptional" got confused ...
  6. rotmistr60 14 October 2015 07: 00 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    “We receive what we ask in a short time”

    Bandits openly say that the United States helps them. No “moderate" should be taken into account when striking.
  7. mamont5 14 October 2015 07: 01 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: sanyadzhan
    Read - ISIS turned to the United States ... And they will deliver, the nannies of terrorism

    This option should always be kept in mind. I hope our military have.
  8. exalex2 14 October 2015 07: 02 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    So after all, they themselves will then receive a spelled from "their own." We are not flying there alone. And to distinguish from the earth who is who is very problematic.
    1. lwxx 14 October 2015 07: 21 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      So after all, they themselves will then receive a spelled from "their own." We are not flying there alone. And to distinguish from the earth who is who is problematic ..System: friend or foe, no one has yet canceled. I think during consultations with colleagues from the SGA our solution will be found, for example, we can begin to supply modern man-portable air defense systems to counter NATO’s illegitimate air raids.
    2. donavi49 14 October 2015 08: 24 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Americans, British and other Frenchmen act simply - they go in echelons above the MANPADS range. They have a ban on dropping less than 4000 m. Therefore friendly fire is excluded.

      The VKS is actively flying less than 3000m, that is, in the reach of MANPADS. CABs are not so rich, and if MANPADS turn off crocodiles with rooks, then the ladies will feel much better.

      So it is quite possible that they will deliver soon. Perhaps through the Saudis and Turks. Perhaps they will outbid what Eagle Strel in eastern Europe.

      Here, after all, what’s the matter, MANPADS may not be limited. The Babahs once captured Osa from Assad. Understood fired 6 missiles - shot down 4 LA. Since every launch was filmed, losses are identified. That wasp was not destroyed, just rockets ran out. And in Eastern Europe, you can collect a whole brood of Os ... But why go far they are in Jordan, but Ukraine, Poland and Georgia will still pay for their Wasps and send specialists for free to such a thing.

      True, there is already a real risk that they will shoot without understanding who and will fill up Rafal / Tornado for the company.
      1. Vadim237 14 October 2015 10: 00 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Against these Os and MANPADS, we have electronic warfare on helicopters and bombers.
        1. donavi49 14 October 2015 10: 52 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Even Lipa is not on Crocodiles ... Only heat traps.
  9. Buffalo 14 October 2015 07: 03 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    U.S. anti-aircraft guns are only supplied with Russian bombs KOB-500.
    Take the kit, gentlemen, terrorists? laughing
  10. 31rus 14 October 2015 07: 05 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    That’s why the CIA oversees this issue with anti-tank and man-portable air defense systems, it’s time to officially declare a no-fly zone over Syria, the goal is obvious until the territory of Syria is released to make the war “long” and harm as much of Russia as possible, here not only weapons will be sure to help in recruiting militants and new training centers around the world (including in Europe), participation in the territories controlled by the militants and special forces is quite possible, it seems now as in the war of 1941-1945 all forces will be thrown to one Syrian front
  11. Taygerus 14 October 2015 07: 12 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    "however, while Washington fears that weapons may fall into the hands of terrorists"
    Yes, not what they are not afraid of, they are just looking for delivery methods through intermediaries so that they do not shine once again, otherwise they are already lit up to the full - a vile gangster state, in a word, the world stronghold of terrorism
  12. Mountain shooter 14 October 2015 07: 12 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    It’s just not clear what cynicism whales can reach. Put MANPADS - it will be necessary to organize the interception of transportation, take into account in the planning of operations, etc. Who would be there to throw something homing in Afghanistan? And help the Taliban in the war of liberation? I understand that stupidity, but so suddenly I wanted to!
  13. Pro100Igor 14 October 2015 07: 14 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    That's the whole answer. lol
  14. Wolka 14 October 2015 07: 21 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    task number 1: to close the possible ways and points of supply of weapons to the IS militants and other "moderate opposition" terrorist groups, primarily the border with Turkey, work for intelligence and special forces, Iran is in the know ...
  15. bairat 14 October 2015 07: 21 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    moderate head cutters
  16. Meh-forester 14 October 2015 07: 22 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    If the Americans do this, then they will be the last draki. Since the events in that region showed that any weapon, the American is no exception, very quickly migrates from one owner to another. And air defense systems, may well be used not only against Russian aviation, but also against American. The question is how much do they need it? The answer is probably soon to find out ...
  17. Alexander S. 14 October 2015 07: 22 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    nothing new. But one thing is interesting ... when finally the American soldiers begin to die from our weapons? For example ... Americans fly over Syria ... we supply it with air defense ... and they shoot down their planes. Or should we not do that?
  18. bmv04636 14 October 2015 07: 24 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Are they not afraid that civilian planes will begin to fall in Ben Gurion?
  19. Mama_Cholli 14 October 2015 07: 26 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    That's all ... Now it is clear to everyone who the moderate Syrian opposition is.
  20. Old Siberian 14 October 2015 07: 27 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Whose planes will be shot down by these "moderate positioners" guess two times.
  21. Zaurbek 14 October 2015 07: 45 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    This is a dangerous business. You can start supplying air defense to Emen, to Afghanistan.
    1. donavi49 14 October 2015 08: 36 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Even Mansur is dangerous in Afghanistan - he threatens to conquer Tajikistan there, after defeating the local collaborators (the Kabul government) and the invaders.

      Another option is Khorasan, which was washed down by the brother of Mula Omar - but this is the Caliphate with the traveling baboons who want to crush the whole of Central Asia.

      Iran is trying to help in Yemen, but there is a big problem. Naval blockade by the forces of the Navy of Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Bahrain and Pakistan. And the Americans are hanging out with reconnaissance ships there, merging coalitions with data on suspicious ships so that they fly on board. Even the small schooners coming from Sudan no longer pass. Large ports are broken, the Hussites have only small marinas. In general, abandoning weapons is the main and key problem.
  22. Svetovod 14 October 2015 07: 57 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Well, how can poor cannibals help the poor? The whole world needs to chip in and throw off what they do not mind. The United States will throw off weapons and Russia will not stand aside and will throw off weapons. Highly accurate.
  23. NDA
    NDA 14 October 2015 08: 04 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Sooner or later, this was to happen ... but how will it go on?
  24. Monster_Fat 14 October 2015 08: 34 New
    • -2
    • 0
    -2
    Syria is doomed. Our sworn "partners" Assad will not allow them to win, in any case, even despite the help of Russia. If suddenly, Assad, with the help of Iran, begins to win, then the Saudis and the Americans will intervene in the war, and then the EU. Even if this does not happen, then they also have a “C” plan - “peacefully”, at all kinds of conferences, to divide Syria and create a “Kurdish” “corridor” for Qatari gas to Europe. Alas, Syria became doomed after the terrible mistake of our foreign ministry, led by M, which allowed the "international coalition" to destroy the regime in Libya.
    1. starpom 14 October 2015 12: 13 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Monster_Fat
      Syria is doomed.

      Is not a fact
    2. starpom 14 October 2015 12: 13 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Monster_Fat
      Syria is doomed.

      Is not a fact
    3. Odysseus 14 October 2015 14: 02 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Monster_Fat
      If suddenly, Assad, with the help of Iran, begins to win, then the Saudis and Americans will intervene in the war, and then the EU

      The United States and the Saudis are already de facto fighting. But they cannot send land forces, the Saudis are stuck in Yemen, the Americans simply have no free forces. The most dangerous are the open borders and the endless number of mercenaries that can be transferred to Syria for the American and saudi money.
      Quote: Monster_Fat
      Even if this does not happen, then they also have a “C” plan - “peacefully”, at all kinds of conferences, to divide Syria and create a “Kurdish” “corridor” for Qatari gas to Europe

      In general, we can agree that the situation in Syria is critical, now its division into 3 parts is the only way out for Assad. The Kurdish corridor for gas is unrealistic, it will either have to finish ISIS, or negotiate with the Shiite government of Iraq, and most likely do both. Plus, independent Kurdistan is a time bomb for Turkey. In any case, there is no other way out for Assad.
      Quote: Monster_Fat
      Alas, Syria became doomed after the terrible mistake of our foreign ministry, led by M, which allowed the "international coalition" to destroy the regime in Libya.

      Enough mistakes were made there and in Syria (that is, "reverence" towards the Western "partners") in the period 2011-2013.
  25. Sergey-8848 14 October 2015 08: 34 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    So the Americans openly admit that they themselves do not know who commands the very opposition, and where it is located. Then who turns to them? It turns out that you can easily tinkle at the Pentagon, the CIA (or immediately into the Oval Office, if officials have blunted), introduce yourself as a great commander who honors democratic values, and trample military-technical assistance?
  26. boris-1230 14 October 2015 08: 55 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    ISIS do not fly on airplanes, whose planes will they shoot down? And like everyone has one enemy ISIS. US cynicism and arrogance go wild
  27. ibu355yandex.ru 14 October 2015 08: 56 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    All this testifies only to one thing - the goals of the "moderate Syrian opposition", America and ISIS coincide at this stage. This is the overthrow of the Assad regime, nothing more!
  28. Watchdog 14 October 2015 09: 07 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    For every suzuka we will find our own bazooka!
  29. Vikxnumx 14 October 2015 09: 11 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    And where did a hundred “Eagles” migrate from the Lviv province?
    1. Vadim237 14 October 2015 10: 03 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Someone sold them, and from someone they are still hidden at home.
  30. Vikxnumx 14 October 2015 09: 15 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: rotmistr60
    Bandits openly say that the United States helps them. No “moderate" should be taken into account when striking.

    On the contrary! Queue first! Or let out of turn (ammunition to choose the VKS and the Russian Navy)!
  31. evge-malyshev 14 October 2015 10: 11 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    "... Syrian opposition needs anti-aircraft weapons to fight government and Russian aviation."

    Wanted to "Patriot" s and "Stinger" s to attract into their ranks? Cards in your hands ... But you can’t hide the “Patriot” and there is a right to it, but I hope we’ll also deal with the “stinger” s.
  32. pvv113 14 October 2015 10: 21 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    from the command of the opposition groups began to receive reports on the supply of larger batches of American arms

    The US has already supplied weapons to Afghanistan, so much so that it’s impossible to find any ends
    The U.S. Department of Defense cannot determine in whose hands the arms delivered to Afghanistan fell, RIA Novosti reports citing the report of the Special Inspector for Afghanistan Reconstruction Projects John Sopko.
    “We are very concerned that the weapons that the US taxpayers paid for could be in the hands of the rebels and used to kill American and Afghan military and civilians,” the report said.
    According to Sopko's report, it’s difficult to track the exact amount of weapons, since the Pentagon’s data are unreliable. The United States sent at least 465 small arms to Afghanistan.

    http://www.aif.ru/politics/world/1217327
  33. Goldmitro 14 October 2015 10: 33 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    In particular, they (the "Syrian opposition") sent a similar request ten days ago through an operations center in Turkey, but so far Washington is worried that the weapons might fall into the hands of terrorists.

    When it was Washington and its accomplices in the Arab monarchies who were afraid to supply the gangs of jihadist terrorists they had created with weapons to fight Russia, including the Stingers, which were delivered to Afghanistan! So in the near future MANPADS will appear in ISIS and other jihadist and "moderate" gangs fighting in Syria!
  34. Kelwin 14 October 2015 10: 40 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    "... Syrian opposition needs anti-aircraft weapons to fight government and Russian aviation."
    We’ll figure it out somehow, they haven’t seen adult toys there yet, like the Tu-160. Another question is, who knows whose hollowed-out hands will fall into the mattress mat and where they will plant it. And if in civilian terms, in Turkey, for example, you don’t get to our Buk there, then what? Or they achieve this. Interestingly, mattresses were taught in childhood that matches are not a toy for children ...
  35. 4ekist 14 October 2015 11: 39 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    I think that sooner or later Dushmans will have a sight. There would be a demand, there would be a proposal. I won’t be surprised if there are also combat crews there. I’ll remove them from the independent “suddenly”.
  36. Stariknv 14 October 2015 12: 11 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Terrorists appealed to the United States to deliver rockets in order to bring down Russian and American planes
  37. GDV
    GDV 14 October 2015 23: 09 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It is necessary so, the first stinger took off, followed by oil terminals and not only in Syria but also in Libya.