I do not want to be a general!

I registered on the “Military Review” website this summer. At first I just read it. Then fascinated, interesting articles, statements and comments. It is felt that on the site adult men with experience in life and in military affairs participate in discussions. Of course, not everyone is currently military, but military service is for sure.


At first, everything was perceived as a simple game, to gain pluses, to get another “title”. Subsequently began to pay more attention to the content of the comments on the articles. I noticed that there are wise and business proposals, and there are just emissions with an eye to getting a plus sign.

Marshals added, and the quality of comments falls.

As far as I understand, let this be a game, but you need to play in this case honestly! And if you received a high “rank”, then your comments, and maybe suggestions, should correspond to your status on the topwar website? And the further you “grow”, the more responsibly you have to approach the content of your statements and comments. It should not be emissions like “death to the fascists,” as I wrote in my article, I don’t remember which of the users, or the indignation that they grabbed a plus sign, and even more so the mat or a hint of it.

Today I have the status of a “colonel”, and, as it were, with experience, but I feel I don’t want to be a general. And even more so marshal. I am not a military man, not an analyst, and the “title” of a colonel suits me perfectly, that is, I can afford to put in a cheerful smiley face and laugh heartily. Without risking to be condemned by some "marshals" who are not marshals at all, but lovers of rattling about something, and some of them have a place on a talk show with Andrey Malakhov and others. Let them discuss the color of the next star's panties!

And what about one discussion of “marshals” and “generals” topics: “Like in the old days: they would be hit by“ Stingers? ”I was just outraged by how site users were discussing ways to destroy our VKS base in Syria throughout the day. And the bulk of truly “literate ways” was expressed precisely by “carriers of high command marks.” And on 100% sure, our common enemies will certainly use these “tips” in Syria.

Well and further, I write especially literate comments with details, I don’t have time for references to articles and facts, but I try to be aware of the main political and military events.

For the reasons stated above, I would prefer to remain in the “officer corps”, and since there is no other way to remain in the so-called “golden middle” (and sometimes you want to express your point of view), you, the users of the site, if not against it, put a minus for article, I will be very grateful to you, otherwise there is not much left to the “general”.

(From VO editorial. Article rating does not affect the author’s rating.)
Author:
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

196 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. apro 15 October 2015 04: 59 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    I really want the icon- to appear? So I want to put some, you write.
    1. Mahmut 15 October 2015 06: 30 New
      • 15
      • 0
      +15
      And I am 100% sure that our common enemies will certainly take advantage of these “tips” in Syria.

      Well, why only enemies. Defining the direction of potential threats for the defenders is also not superfluous.
      Suppose that the next wise advice on how to attack a military base was noted by both the attacker and the defending side. What will happen if the attackers want to use it. And there will be an ambush and cruel defeat for them. Or I'm wrong.
      1. Lukich 15 October 2015 09: 02 New
        • 11
        • 0
        +11
        Quote: Mahmut
        And I am 100% sure that our common enemies will certainly take advantage of these “tips” in Syria.

        but I’m not sure that the terrorists from Syria are tracking the comments on the Military Review website. with all due respect to the site
        1. tomket 15 October 2015 09: 20 New
          • 11
          • 0
          +11
          Quote: Lukich
          that Syrian terrorists are tracking comments on the Military Review website. with all due respect to the site

          Yeah. Someone wrote about the "Stingers" on the VO, and the terrorists read and beat themselves on the forehead with their fist. How could we never have thought of this before !! Call Obama let him go with a thousand "Stingers" for dinner!
          1. Manul 15 October 2015 09: 52 New
            • 7
            • 0
            +7
            Quote: tomket
            Yeah. Someone wrote about the "Stingers" on the VO, and the terrorists read and beat themselves on the forehead with their fist. How could we never have thought of this before !! Call Obama let him go with a thousand "Stingers" for dinner!

            winked As the bearded man imagined tearing curls from frustration, so laughter made out laughing .
            The author should have limited himself to the literary-rating aspect; he was in vain drawn to state security. Of course, comments are always visible for the sake of pluses, but we have a very serious resource for the administration for this - they will squeeze anyone, despite past merits.
            And also - I turn to the author, we have the opportunity to file a complaint. If you think that a person has crossed the line of good and evil, you can slander him. I used this function myself because, like you, it depends on us how much the site will be good. And I have jumps and mistakes. I received warnings from administrators, but I try to analyze and make my comments better. And the advantages for the title are not an end in itself - this is the comment rating. Perhaps we can turn your message into a favor only in one way (it is unlikely that the plusophiles will stop writing for the sake of ranks, and do not forget, there are trolls with us who also work for the rank - how do you define them?) - ask the administration not to take into account the advantages provocative comments. But the sacred question arises - who will determine the quality criterion? So what can leave everything as it is?
        2. SRC P-15 15 October 2015 09: 21 New
          • 8
          • 0
          +8
          you, users of the site, if you don’t mind, put a minus for the article, I will be very grateful to you, otherwise there is not much left for the “general”.

          Dear author, to your regret, as written below your article -
          (From VO editorial. Article rating does not affect the author’s rating.)
          ,
          So these disadvantages will not help you. And if you really would like to get more minuses, then put the flag in your hands - write something in support of the USA or the Islamic State, and a shaft of minuses is provided to you. So you seem to be a little cunning.
          I apologize in advance for directness.
          1. kayman4 15 October 2015 10: 48 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Interested in how many of those discussing have real data on the base defense device on hand? To build any normal plans without at least partially opening the defense system (at all levels) is nonsense.
        3. Altona 15 October 2015 11: 19 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Lukich
          but I’m not sure that the terrorists from Syria are tracking the comments on the Military Review website. with all due respect to the site

          -------------------
          Ukrainians read so 100% ... Russian after all ... laughing
        4. woron333444 15 October 2015 16: 12 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Yes, and the General Staff will not read.
  2. Ivan Slavyanin 15 October 2015 05: 08 New
    • 30
    • 0
    +30
    I agree with the author one hundred percent! The fact is that “VO” created a virtual value - army ranks - and many, to get them, say nonsense, and as much as possible! Even evaluating the articles, many, not understanding the essence of the article, but highlighting individual phrases, taking it out of context, begin to judge and put pros or cons.
    1. venaya 15 October 2015 05: 33 New
      • 20
      • 0
      +20
      Quote: Ivan Slav
      Even evaluating the articles, many, not understanding the essence of the article, but highlighting individual phrases, taking it out of context, begin to judge and put pros or cons.

      How I personally experience it. As soon as a comment essentially requires thinking, endless minuses immediately fly. So I want to ask the commenters: Do you really not want to think? At least somehow explain your position.
      1. Rav075 15 October 2015 05: 52 New
        • 19
        • 0
        +19
        I completely agree! Express your own opinion on the article or the issue under discussion, and instead of the discussion you get a "-". Trying to explain further, and here .... ATU ITS, ATU !!! After that, there is no desire to comment on anything for a few days. request
      2. Alexander Romanov 15 October 2015 06: 09 New
        • 9
        • 0
        +9
        Quote: venaya

        How I personally experience it. As soon as a comment essentially requires thinking, endless minuses immediately fly.

        Dear, someone who, and you sculpt minuses to all who are not hitting. Because you do not complain. As I understand it, take revenge on easy wink
        1. venaya 15 October 2015 06: 37 New
          • 6
          • 0
          +6
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          and you sculpt minuses to all who are not hitting. Therefore, you do not complain.

          Talentedly! It is important to blame, and then even though the grass does not grow. sad
          1. Alexander Romanov 15 October 2015 06: 56 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            Quote: venaya

            Talentedly! It is important to blame, and then even though the grass does not grow.

            Yes, no, without talent, I just looked at who and to whom and how many minuses I posted in the topic and just wink
            1. Bekas1967 15 October 2015 08: 47 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              And there’s nothing to look at others, you have to watch yourself ..
              1. Aleksey_K 15 October 2015 19: 30 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Quote: Bekas1967
                And there’s nothing to look at others, you have to watch yourself ..

                Dear, you are wrong. "Alexander Romanov" is a moderator, so almost all the information on the site is available to him, well, the most different statistics on readers too, as well as means of influencing the reader.
                To understand who you are having a conversation with, click the mouse or something named "Alexander Romanov" or another "name" and you will get brief information about the reader.
            2. My address 15 October 2015 20: 19 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Citizens!
              Companions!

              I dislike Romanov because of his stubborn faith in GDP. But one must be objective, he: does not lie; does not mess; far from ddurrakk.

              And, most importantly, under the article - well, what is attached to the statement about ways to spoil Russia and that it is impossible to do this? After all, the main point of the article is that the so-called The generals in most do not pull on the generals. I even in one note had a request to assign me two lumens, two stars, what I achieved in civilian life, so that I could show off from what had been achieved, but what was actually achieved. Do not print it. And the fact that many have a lot of advantages earned by useless, but positive comments, where does it go? And the disgusting literacy of some of the "Generals," which even me, a troechnik in Russian, is shocking?

              I consider it necessary to change some of the rules of the site. And that's fine.
          2. Buffalo 15 October 2015 08: 23 New
            • 8
            • 0
            +8
            What is, that is, Sasha!
            I remembered one bike.
            On a market day, in the town square, some stranger publicly announced that Vasily’s father has two daughters and both are whores.
            People silently listened to the stranger, taken aback by the news.
            But, one idle man, suddenly remembering, went up to the slanderer and said to his face:
            - Father Vasily has no daughters! He has two sons and both are quiet guys!
            To which the slanderer answered him:
            - And now, let him now try to wash himself!
          3. andj61 15 October 2015 09: 48 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: venaya
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            and you sculpt minuses to all who are not hitting. Therefore, you do not complain.

            Talentedly! It is important to blame, and then even though the grass does not grow. sad

            Alexander Romanov is a moderator, and he can simply and easily check who you have set up cons! yes
            So you are clearly cunning - there is no reason not to believe Romanov. request
            1. ava09 15 October 2015 10: 03 New
              • 6
              • 0
              +6
              Quote: andj61
              there is no reason not to believe Romanov


              Not about trust in Romanov, but about trust in general. Any position and access to information does not guarantee the objectivity of the holder.
        2. EvgNik 15 October 2015 07: 25 New
          • 8
          • 0
          +8
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          As I understand it, avenge easy

          I noticed that if I answered the minus one, even warning that I myself did not minus, then for a few days you get minuses for any comments. Revenge does not paint.
          1. Bekas1967 15 October 2015 08: 48 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Fate of the weak ... and the vain, of which there are many ..
            1. Turkir 15 October 2015 09: 58 New
              • 5
              • 0
              +5
              I join your opinion.
              What is it worth only annoying comments about - "the caravan goes", "a lot of bukaff" and just pictures that "fit" to articles on completely different topics.
        3. vladimir_krm 15 October 2015 08: 39 New
          • 7
          • 0
          +7
          And what - anyone can find out who puts the cons to him?

          However, it doesn’t matter: they have the right. As for the article, just as I was an aging two-year-old, it remained so. This is my honestly deserved. And the "general" title does not play any role here. Well, the admins made the rating like this, the original one. Funny thanks. But not more. Not children to chase or refuse.
          1. andj61 15 October 2015 09: 50 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: vladimir_krm
            And what - anyone can find out who puts the cons to him?

            It used to be, now only moderators can find out.
            1. Ingvar 72 15 October 2015 14: 41 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: andj61
              It used to be

              Something I do not remember when it was? winked
              1. Aleksey_K 15 October 2015 20: 01 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Quote: Ingvar 72
                Quote: andj61
                It used to be

                Something I do not remember when it was? winked

                Believe me, it was like that.
                1. Ingvar 72 15 October 2015 20: 43 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: Алексей_К
                  Believe me, it was like that.

                  I rarely accept on faith. wink You and I are at about the same time at VO, but I don’t remember when it was possible to see a minuscule to a mere mortal. To the moderator, yes, but I have not seen the authors of any pluses or minuses.
      3. Lukich 15 October 2015 09: 03 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Quote: venaya
        Don't you really want to think? At least somehow explain your position.

        totally agree with you. put a minus - justify
        1. Manul 15 October 2015 09: 59 New
          • 6
          • 0
          +6
          Quote: Lukich

          totally agree with you. put a minus - justify

          This does not always work out. If everyone will justify the minus, we will have ten pages of comments on a regular article, and thirty on a top one.
      4. marlin1203 15 October 2015 10: 14 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        Yeah ... I caught 64 minuses here the other day, and when I try to establish the reasons for the misunderstanding, there are as many more! Nothing - Alive laughing
        1. afdjhbn67 15 October 2015 10: 43 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          Quote: marlin1203
          Yeah ... I caught 64 minuses here the other day, and when I try to establish the reasons for the misunderstanding, there are as many more! Nothing - Alive laughing


          my anti-record is 116 minuses - I felt like a real liberal laughing
          It happens that the herd instinct just works .. And the rest is a normal site (Sanya fix) a responsible team, a community of interests, and that bribes 90 percent if they served the Motherland in uniform no more
          1. ava09 15 October 2015 11: 03 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: afdjhbn67
            And the rest is a normal site (Sanya fix)


            )))))))))PRETTY BOY -))))))))))
          2. atalef 15 October 2015 12: 56 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: afdjhbn67
            Quote: marlin1203
            Yeah ... I caught 64 minuses here the other day, and when I try to establish the reasons for the misunderstanding, there are as many more! Nothing - Alive laughing


            my anti-record is 116 minuses - I felt like a real liberal laughing
            It happens that the herd instinct just works .. And the rest is a normal site (Sanya fix) a responsible team, a community of interests, and that bribes 90 percent if they served the Motherland in uniform no more

            116
      5. alicante11 15 October 2015 11: 11 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        As soon as a comment essentially requires thinking, endless minuses immediately fly


        Well, on my own I can say that I almost do not minus the comments that I answer. Because it means there is a rational thought, albeit controversial from my point of view. And the interlocutor, even with opposing views, must be respected. And if a stupid or very arrogant comment can be answered only by going to the person, then there is no sense in substituting a warning or ban, it’s better to put a minus sign. Also, if comments have already been commented on in a style with which I agree, I don’t feel like repeating myself somehow. Therefore, minus (and plus for the comment with which I agree) is the best option.
        1. Manul 15 October 2015 20: 51 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: alicante11
          And if a stupid or very arrogant comment can be answered only by going to the person, then there is no sense in substituting a warning or ban, it’s better to put a minus sign.

          Brilliant. On this thread (thanks to the author)) there are already so many unique phrases, I don’t have time to enter them in the quote box.
      6. Altona 15 October 2015 11: 22 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: venaya
        How I personally experience it. As soon as a comment essentially requires thinking, endless minuses immediately fly. So I want to ask the commenters: Do you really not want to think? At least somehow explain your position.

        -----------------
        There is always a category of “silent avengers” who put a “minus” just like that, so don’t bother ... Such is the la vie ... laughing
      7. Karabanov 15 October 2015 16: 41 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: venaya
        How I personally experience it. As soon as a comment essentially requires thinking, endless minuses immediately fly. So I want to ask the commenters: Do you really not want to think? At least somehow explain your position.

        Perhaps I will also express myself ... You know, the VO site is not the most "advanced" in terms of real estimates, forecasts, analytics of various aspects. There are plenty of dumb schoolboys and various sofa marshals.
        Like everywhere, who wants to curry favor and grab stars there are several simple solutions:
        1) You need to submit your comment as high as possible on the thread (preferably first), the higher the more likely it is to be read (quality is not the most important point). After all, many people simply do not watch all the comments, and laziness ...
        2) The reading individual pays attention to the status of the commentator - title, flag, and the number of pluses.
        Herd feeling is triggered here. Many advantages - I’ll add. Nenuacho, am I dumber than others?
        If "Marshal" means Tipo - special. Fuini won't say ...
        The flag is, say, Israeli or Lithuanian, then the stopudovo squabble has fuzzed ... They read it already biased.
        3) More comments should be added to the comment. Like - to the Nazis death, the mattresses are stupid ... Well, or at worst put a photo of a tricolor or a smug Putin.
        This is a kind of competition for not self-sufficient and not distant comrades. And the most interesting thing is that they do not climb really serious sites where techies, engineers, real generals and other specialists are present, shkolota and plus collectors. Nobody will listen to them there. And here..
        In general, I agree with you, the quality of comments is steadily declining. Sensibly and essentially quite a few statements. If you talk about topical issues, moreover, those who have been suffering by you, they begin to accuse of plagiarism or, like, did you even serve? Many people like not to take off their pink glasses and live in a virtual machine. There is a fashion for patriotism today (for this expression I mercilessly zaminusut).
        Unfortunately, it must be admitted that nothing will change from this anyway, whether we want it or not. So I recommend really curious and thoughtful companions, among the present slag, to select more sober and adequate comments. Although they are in the minority, they are also present.
    2. EvgNik 15 October 2015 05: 49 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Quote: Ivan Slav
      many, not understanding the essence of the article, but singling out individual phrases, taking them out of context, begin to judge and put pros or cons

      Have you noticed? If the article is quite voluminous, comments like "Too many beeches" appear. And there are much fewer comments on these articles than on informational messages of 15-30 lines.
      1. Uncle VasyaSayapin 15 October 2015 09: 49 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Simple and understandable - just understandable and everyone is interested in discussing it. But difficult is difficult for perception and therefore people are lost and silent. About this, Cyril Parkinson wrote, having studied the functioning mechanism of British institutions for another 30-40s. hi
    3. Alexander Romanov 15 October 2015 06: 08 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Quote: Ivan Slav
      Even evaluating articles, many, not understanding the essence of the article,

      Firstly, percent of 90, they read only the headline and the maximum is the last paragraph.
      And secondly, things will change soon hi
      1. atalef 15 October 2015 06: 26 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Quote: Ivan Slav
        Even evaluating articles, many, not understanding the essence of the article,

        Firstly, percent of 90, they read only the headline and the maximum is the last paragraph.
        And secondly, things will change soon hi

        Title and first 5 comments to understand where and where the wind is blowing.
        1. Bekas1967 15 October 2015 08: 53 New
          • 9
          • 0
          +9
          The wind is blowing at the mill of cheers-patriotism. “We’ll tear it all and take it away (here recently one wanted to blow the Ukrainian official)” - I grabbed so many advantages)))
      2. Lukich 15 October 2015 09: 33 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        And secondly, things will change soon

        how? new site concept?
      3. andj61 15 October 2015 09: 56 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Quote: Ivan Slav
        Even evaluating articles, many, not understanding the essence of the article,

        Firstly, percent of 90, they read only the headline and the maximum is the last paragraph.
        And secondly, things will change soon hi

        Alexander, and you will not open this veil of mystery about changes? winked
        Over the past year, all these issues have been repeatedly discussed, there have been many proposals to change the system of "ranks" or to cancel them, but nothing has been changed. It is clear that the possibility of chasing the "ranks" introduces some element of the game, and many are interested in it. And more visitors to the site - more deductions from advertising, more "benefits" to administrators. But I would still like to know, and maybe, what the hell isn’t joking, and the moderators will give such an opportunity to discuss the changes. The decision will still be made by no means on the basis of voting. soldier
      4. Manul 15 October 2015 10: 00 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        Quote: Alexander Romanov

        And secondly, things will change soon

        belay All will be demoted ...
        1. Buffalo 15 October 2015 10: 22 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          Nah, everyone will be awarded the title of Marshal, so that there is no envy and inequality on the site. laughing
          1. ava09 15 October 2015 11: 13 New
            • 5
            • 0
            +5
            Quote: Bison
            Nah, everyone will be awarded the title of Marshal, so that there is no envy and inequality on the site.


            I won’t be surprised if I find out that someone from the "high-ranking" stars, "granted" on the site washes. -))))) Guys, this is VIRTUAL reality. In life, your own MIND is important and it does not depend on even the real army rank, and even on the "Internet" and even more so ...
            1. perm23 15 October 2015 11: 50 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Totally agree with you.
            2. Manul 15 October 2015 11: 54 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: ava09
              I won’t be surprised if I find out that someone from the "high-ranking" stars, "granted" on the site washes. -))))) Guys, this is VIRTUAL reality. In life, your own MIND is important and it does not depend on even the real army rank, and even on the "Internet" and even more so ...

              We are washing good news here. drinks And new good acquaintances. And stars. Do you feel sorry for our liver?
          2. Scraptor 15 October 2015 20: 55 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Introduce buttonholes lol
      5. vsoltan 15 October 2015 10: 46 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        For a long time and repeatedly and many raised the issues of changing the structure of the forum .... Waiting for ...
      6. Aleksey_K 15 October 2015 19: 48 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Firstly, percent of 90, they read only the headline and the maximum is the last paragraph.
        And secondly, things will change soon

        1. I suggest not to put minuses on comments. If someone doesn’t like it, just let his rating not increase.
        2. I also propose expanding the boundaries of rating increase. If I liked, for example, the 10 comments of one reader, then I would like to put my “+” on each comment (that is, the total of 10 pluses), but only one for one comment.
        3. It would not be bad for plus and minus if it remains, to provide the reader with a choice of the parameter by which he evaluates the comment. And the moderators should monitor the correspondence of the chosen parameter and the content of the comment, well, the removal of this plus or minus, if the reader just takes revenge. I myself, for example, am also sinful by this.
        4. And I suggest stricter with violations of the rules - for example, the word "crest" in the rules is not allowed to be written, but it is used very often.
        5. If the comment does not comply with the rules, then the message "comment deleted" is usually displayed. I propose: delete the comment, but allow the reader to correct his comment and restore it after verification. Sometimes it’s enough to fix one word.
    4. atalef 15 October 2015 06: 16 New
      • 30
      • 0
      +30
      Quote: Ivan Slav
      The fact is that “VO” created a virtual value - army ranks - and many, to get them, say nonsense, and as much as possible!

      it’s enough 100 to scream while shouting, to quote Bismarck’s fictitious quote, not to forget more electronic warfare, and of course to walk along the 5-th column and the Jews.
      And that's it, you're a marshall.
      Of course, I understand that in general (+) and (-) is a cut of both level and mood.
      This is a given and this can be applied both with humor and with regret.
      But this fact and in general would not play any role if the skulls did not give a restriction in the comments.
      Many perceive the title - as if it is something that they are standing in this world and an addition to unrealized toys in war games.
      Well, the same is good. As they say, no matter what the child is amusing - if only not with his hands.
      The problem is that people who do not have any knowledge, understanding, or anything that can not reach high ranks and the possibility of influence-- except Uryayay and drafts are bald.
      It would be nice if the site had the option (for those who wish) to refuse the rating and remain an ordinary (or ensign wink )
      1. Alexander Romanov 15 October 2015 06: 18 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: atalef
        Of course, I understand that in general (+) and (-) is a cut of both level and mood.

        Catch a plus, before you are driven into the skull laughing
        1. atalef 15 October 2015 06: 25 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Quote: atalef
          Of course, I understand that in general (+) and (-) is a cut of both level and mood.

          Catch a plus, before you are driven into the skull laughing

          Hi Sanya.
          Drive - but as they say in Africa
          - If rape cannot be avoided, relax and try to have fun laughing
          1. Alexander Romanov 15 October 2015 06: 37 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: atalef
            - If rape cannot be avoided, relax and try to have fun

            I already gave you the garters wink
            Zionists are healthy laughing
          2. Buffalo 15 October 2015 10: 28 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Liznul?
            Deflection counted!
            Careful, with this - you can completely lick it.
          3. lelikas 15 October 2015 11: 49 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: atalef
            Drive - but as they say in Africa

            The State Department from the next article will defend! :)
        2. domokl 15 October 2015 06: 35 New
          • 8
          • 0
          +8
          Pulled in the belly. He rubbed his epaulettes with an asidol ... Now it seems like a real one.
          The conversation about general uniforms has been going on for years. And about the quality of comments too. And things are still there now. Therefore, I agree with the author. There can be no general from the comments. And there cannot be a general without agreement with other generals or marshals.
          But I also think about ensigns. Why not? Necessary, even necessary people. Legs and hands of the army, and of such sites. You need to think about it.
          Sanya, hi! hi
          1. Alexander Romanov 15 October 2015 06: 54 New
            • 9
            • 0
            +9
            Quote: domokl
            And there cannot be a general without agreement with other generals or marshals.

            Sanya, you propose creating a commission for admission to the generals and marshals. So this is corruption on the site. There will be bribes to offer, and if they start to give a lot, I don’t get tired wassat
            1. EvgNik 15 October 2015 07: 30 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              Will offer bribes

              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              create a commission for admission to generals and marshals

              Thanks, laughed.
              1. Scraptor 15 October 2015 21: 11 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Accepted into the generalissimo ... I want a gray generalissimo. laughing laughing laughing
                I lured a number of shopkeepers on the site to stupidly spoil Yaki-38/141 and gloriously praise the glamorous F-35, but it's good that at least the "anniversary of the end of the Poltava confrontation" is not soon ....
          2. Colonel 15 October 2015 09: 40 New
            • 10
            • 0
            +10
            Quote: domokl
            Army legs and arms

            Like, will I go to service while my hands are on? wink
            Warrant officers, do not be offended by the barracks humor. Folklore all the same. In revenge about the officers:
            lieutenant - does not know anything;
            Art. lieutenant - knows something;
            captain - knows everything;
            major - forgot something;
            lieutenant colonel - remembers something;
            Colonel - knows where to sign;
            General - remembers how to sign.
            But seriously, in my opinion, for those who wore real epaulettes for at least a few years, all the dances with virtual shoulder marks on the drum.
            For atalefa - you know, again, in my opinion, no one on the site got skulls in vain. I periodically put you cons, but also advantages. And your virtual rank is higher than mine. Questions to the "mechanism" of the site, of course, are. But not enough to inflate the problem out of it.
            Someone from the ancients said: "I did everything I could. Who can let it do better." It seems to me in the subject.
          3. afdjhbn67 15 October 2015 10: 55 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: domokl
            But I also think about ensigns. Why not? Necessary, even necessary people. Legs and hands of the army, and of such sites. You need to think about it.
            Sanya, hi!
            Reply Quote Report Abuse


            All with the Ukrainian flag, regardless of rank - immediately to the warrant officers, part of the supply managers to the site to employ ... laughing
            1. atalef 15 October 2015 13: 02 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: afdjhbn67
              Quote: domokl
              But I also think about ensigns. Why not? Necessary, even necessary people. Legs and hands of the army, and of such sites. You need to think about it.
              Sanya, hi!
              Reply Quote Report Abuse


              All with the Ukrainian flag, regardless of rank - immediately to the warrant officers, part of the supply managers to the site to employ ... laughing

              Well, yes, a crest without a line that ....- who served continued knows
      2. venaya 15 October 2015 06: 29 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: atalef
        ... and of course walk along the 5th column and the Jews. And that's it, you're a marshall.

        I understand your problems, but my experience also shows that try to praise Russia or the peoples inhabiting it, often an inexplicable reaction also arises. Although I recall: this is the site of the "Military Review" of the Russian Federation, and not at all foreign. There are many peoples in the world, even read, comment, but the praise of foreigners should naturally be surprising, perhaps you just need to be a little more modest.
        1. Bekas1967 15 October 2015 09: 02 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Truly valuable and great does not require praise, it speaks for itself. There is no reason to shout “Greatness of Russia” on every corner, it is clear to everyone in the whole world. It is also clear that Jews, let's say, are not the last people on this planet ..
          1. alicante11 15 October 2015 11: 27 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Truly valuable and great does not require praise, it speaks for itself. There is no reason to shout at every corner about the "Greatness of Russia",


            There is no need to scream, but letting them trample the Motherland into the mud is also not an option. Truth and objectivity steers. As there in the midshipmen there was "life to the motherland, honor to nobody."
            1. Buffalo 15 October 2015 11: 40 New
              • 8
              • 0
              +8
              This is not from the Midshipmen.
              This is the "Code of the Russian officer." Compiled by Valentin Kulchitsky, 1904


              “Code of Honor of a Russian Officer”

              1. Do not promise if you are not sure that you will fulfill the promise.

              2. Keep yourself simple, with dignity, without fatigue.

              3. It is necessary to remember that border where politeness full of dignity ends and cringing begins.

              4. Do not write rash letters and reports rashly.

              5. Be less frank - you will regret it. Remember: my tongue is my enemy!

              6. Do not cut it - you can’t prove daring, but you’ll compromise yourself.

              7. Do not rush to get on a short foot with a person whom you have not recognized enough.

              8. Avoid cash accounts with friends. Money always spoils relationships.

              9. Do not take offensive remarks, witticisms, ridicule spoken after, which often happens on the streets and in public places, at your own expense.

              Be above it. Go away - you won’t lose, but you will get rid of the scandal.

              10. If you can’t say anything good about someone, then refrain from talking bad, if you know.

              11. Do not neglect anyone's advice - listen. The right, whether to follow it or not, will remain with you. Managing to take good advice from another is no less an art than giving yourself good advice.

              12. The officer’s strength is not in impulses, but in indestructible calm.

              13. Take care of the reputation of the woman who trusted you, no matter who she is.

              14. There are situations in life when you need to silence your heart and live with reason.

              15. The mystery communicated by you to at least just one person ceases to be a mystery.

              16. Always be on the lookout and don't dissolve.

              17. Try to keep your words soft in the argument, and your arguments firm. Try not to annoy the enemy, but to convince him.

              18. At public masquerades, officers are not allowed to dance.

              19. When speaking, avoid gestures and do not raise your voice.

              20. If you enter a society in the midst of which there is a person with whom you are in a quarrel, then, greeting everyone, it is customary to give a hand and to him, of course, if this cannot be avoided without paying attention to those present or to the owners. Giving a hand does not give rise to excessive talk, but does not oblige you to anything.

              21. Nothing teaches as awareness of one’s mistake. This is one of the main means of self-education. Only he who does nothing is not mistaken.

              22. When two people quarrel, both are always to blame.

              23. Authority is acquired by knowledge of business and service. It is important that subordinates respect you, not be afraid. Where there is fear, there is no love, but there is a secret ill-will or hatred.

              24. There is nothing worse than indecision. Better a worse decision than hesitation or inaction. You will not return the missed moment.

              25. The one who fears nothing is more powerful than the one whom everyone fears.

              26. Soul - to God, heart - to a woman, duty - to the Fatherland, honor - to no one!
          2. perm23 15 October 2015 11: 55 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Sorry, well, I think it’s time for us to shout about Great Russia for a long time. and then over the past years, everyone around has shouted about the greatness of the West. And if today we will not praise our Russia, then our children will not respect it. Because they will only hear about the great West.
        2. atalef 15 October 2015 09: 08 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          Quote: venaya
          Quote: atalef
          ... and of course walk along the 5th column and the Jews. And that's it, you're a marshall.

          I understand your problems, but my experience also shows that try to praise Russia or the peoples inhabiting it, often an inexplicable reaction also arises. Although I recall: this is the site of the "Military Review" of the Russian Federation, and not at all foreign. There are many peoples in the world, even read, comment, but the praise of foreigners should naturally be surprising, perhaps you just need to be a little more modest.

          In general, I have no problems, since this day I opened this site and saw what many people don’t even know about, I understand the pros and cons of the ranks, I think - you should leave the ranks - just do not limit the skull in comments - this will bring some order and will force some to abandon practice - to drive into the skull - just to shut up their mouth, if a person does not violate the rules of the site, he has the right to speak out regardless of the rating
          1. alicante11 15 October 2015 11: 37 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            this will restore some order and force some to abandon practice - to drive into the skulls - just to shut up


            Yes, here's a nonsense. ONE user, and even several, well, he will not be able to drive anyone into the "skull". You’ll rather drive yourself. For me, somehow, for reckless five minuses per day during a heated discussion, half the rating. Like five warnings at a time. So those who are not accepted by the majority of site users are driven into the skull. So if you really don’t feel like looking at “non-kosher” comments, then put everyone in an emergency, leave only Alexander Romanov, the Tower, Domokl, with whom you probably started the site. It's just that. But then you will not have the opportunity to control the audience with your comments. They simply will not be seen by anyone. So you have to pay for all the pleasures, even with virtual skulls.
          2. Scraptor 15 October 2015 21: 18 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: atalef
            I'm on this site since its opening

            so-so-so, from now on - in more detail ... Were you in the initiative group? lol

            "Well, Semyon Semenovich !?" laughing
            Oh yeah ...
      3. inkass_98 15 October 2015 07: 25 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: atalef
        walk on the 5-th column and the Jews.

        This is our everything! It goes without the fifth column, especially since the dispute is with people who are close in upbringing and (sometimes) the level of education, but who live in a country with a completely different standard of living and approach to the system of life values.
        Here it is like with skakkami, with all the proletarian hatred - to the nail :)
        Z.Y. I’ll add a rating so that they don’t immediately drop to the skulls :)
      4. Good me 15 October 2015 08: 16 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: atalef
        it’s enough 100 to scream while shouting, to quote Bismarck’s fictitious quote, not to forget more electronic warfare, and of course to walk along the 5-th column and the Jews.
        And that's it, you're a marshall.


        Another “reverse process” is also possible, which is confirmed by practice: the user begins to troll by pulling the interlocutor into a discussion on favorable terms for himself, using the “ARE PROVE!” Technique, while unceremoniously touching on topics of religion, interethnic relations and other “sick” issues ...

        But the people on the site, not the frayer, see everything ... And such faces, from the "colonels", in two days, "roll down" to the "foreman".
        1. Manul 15 October 2015 10: 06 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Good I
          Another “reverse process” is also possible, which is confirmed by practice: the user begins to troll by pulling the interlocutor into a discussion on favorable terms for himself, using the “ARE PROVE!” Technique, while unceremoniously touching on topics of religion, interethnic relations and other “sick” issues ...

          good Peerless !!! hi Especially
          drawing the interlocutor into a discussion on favorable terms
          1. Scraptor 15 October 2015 21: 20 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            ask for a link (proof) you still must not forget ... so they are taught, then show the language and turn guz.
        2. lelikas 15 October 2015 11: 54 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Good I
          Another “reverse process” is also possible, which is confirmed by practice: the user begins to troll by pulling the interlocutor into a discussion on favorable terms for himself, using the “ARE PROVE!” Technique, while unceremoniously touching on topics of religion, interethnic relations and other “sick” issues ...

          But the people on the site, not the frayer, see everything ... And such faces, from the "colonels", in two days, "roll down" to the "foreman".

          I have long offered not to ban trolls, but rather leave a couple for divorce. It is more interesting with them - they can be fed.
          And if a person is guided by the troll’s machinations - alas - this means that he still needs to work on himself.
      5. Buffalo 15 October 2015 08: 41 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        It turns out that not all soldiers carry marshal wands in their knapsacks! laughing And not every soldier wants to become a general! There are pacifists, or those who dress up in their toga. Or appeals to high ideals, setting himself the task of achieving mundane selfish goals.
        I agree only with the fact that usually “nods” and “approvers”, who do not enter into heated discussions, are gaining faster pluses.
        Second moment. Whoever scored the first lines in a branch sets the tone, both in sight and in pluses. The rest, at best, respond. And at worst, no one is watching their review. The defect in the comment system is evident.
        1. biznaw 15 October 2015 13: 00 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Bison
          Second moment. Whoever scored the first lines in a branch sets the tone, both in sight and in pluses. The rest, at best, respond. And at worst, no one is watching their review. The defect in the comment system is evident.


          I could not resist put a plus. I'm sorry ...
          At first I thought that the ranks were real, I was looking in the registration form for a column to put my own, I was disappointed. Not seriously, this is a rank for plus or minus for a military site. Than these teenage complexes with toys with the title are better than nothing at all. Who has long been on the site already knows the price of each other, and beginners will find out.
          1. Ingvar 72 15 October 2015 15: 14 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: biznaw
            At first I thought that the ranks were real, I was looking in the form of registration for a column to put my own, I was disappointed.

            He laughed heartily! Is it natural naivety or subtle glum? With the Union (in all history), we did not have as many marshals as here!laughing
            1. BMW
              BMW 15 October 2015 17: 36 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: Ingvar 72
              With the Union (in all history), we did not have as many marshals as here!

              Great Russia, and the marshals in it can not be counted.
      6. Bekas1967 15 October 2015 08: 55 New
        • -1
        • 0
        -1
        It’s not just a “piece”)))) it’s better to be a corporal)))
      7. Turkir 15 October 2015 10: 01 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        It would be nice if the site had the option (for those who wish) to refuse the rating and remain an ordinary (or ensign wink)

        Leave the ranks alone - let it be just a "servant".
        what
      8. The comment was deleted.
      9. Ural resident 15 October 2015 10: 28 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        Also noticed - for the "cheers" here the people are gaining ratings. Only some critical comment - immediately minus. I myself like to support a not always popular opinion - for truth is born in a dispute. And do not care about the cons. I’m a patriot, but I don’t accept hatred - we really suffered because of this in history. We are really now at the crossroads of time and danger is hanging over our civilization. And you have to be very thoughtful, pragmatic and cautious in actions and statements. And it’s not a sin to learn from enemies - there are a lot of talented people. And this is possible only in polemics and discussions.
        On the Ukrainian topic, discussions were generally off-scale - they called the Ukrainians themselves zombie dancers, watered the censor and did the same themselves. What are we better then? As something happens for us - Ukrainians rejoice - as they have - ours are jumping here for joy. Some comparisons are not good ...
        all messages like "The caravan goes" minus right away, alternative opinions - plus
      10. afdjhbn67 15 October 2015 10: 52 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: atalef
        it’s enough 100 to scream while shouting, to quote Bismarck’s fictitious quote, not to forget more electronic warfare, and of course to walk along the 5-th column and the Jews.
        And that's it, you're a marshall.


        In Sasha today, the shoulder strap looks more cheerful laughing
        Actually, this is a robust and quite original idea with titles, and if something goes wrong, we spoil something ourselves ..
      11. alicante11 15 October 2015 11: 23 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        The problem is that people who do not have any knowledge, understanding, or anything that can not reach high ranks and the possibility of influence-- except Uryayay and drafts are bald.


        Well, what are you modest about? You also had a lot of stars. Just your comments, as well as the actions of your fellow tribesmen, often cause a well-deserved indignation. Still, the Russian site and peremptory comments, of course, will not add to your popularity.

        It would be nice if the site had the option (for those who wish) to refuse the rating and remain an ordinary (or ensign wink)


        And safely troll the majority of the site? C'mon, it’s the same as letting the Hezbollah fighter walk around the Jewish city, albeit not with a gun, but with a bat and a note that the police and local residents have no right to fight back and dodge.
      12. korvin1976 15 October 2015 11: 46 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Strangely enough, I completely agree, both with the article and with atalef.
        Personally, I do not care about the ranks and other whitewash, make me ordinary, I will not be offended. In the region, make a sergeant, this is my real army rank.
        All these pluses and minuses, of course, are of little importance, they are simply necessary, but .... certainly they should not influence any titles and regalia there.
        The lion part of the pluses is under comments like:
        I agree with the previous speaker;
        All sorts of copyrights;
        A big quote from another user, and under it 8 -20 letters, about nothing;
        and everything else is in the same vein.
        It is very rare to find pluses when a full detailed answer is given in the commentary, which reflects the author’s thought. I understand that reading such comments is difficult: "a lot of bukf"
        My policy for setting "ratings":
        If the comment is substantive, and carries a certain thought, a thought which gives rise to reflection. Such a comment is clearly worthy of a plus
        If the comment is about nothing, more precisely about what I talked about above, then this comment is clearly not a plus, and there is a desire to minus this comment. For this is called flood, and not otherwise
        Well, now about the minuses, I only minus those comments that carry a certain thought, but this thought carries either lies or serious insults. Moreover, I leave the simple insulting comments that do not carry a bit of thought untouched, such comments are already the problem of the moderators.
        I will never deny justified comments, and even if I fundamentally disagree with them. A forum for that and a forum that would be an opportunity for communication.
        After reading my thoughts, just go through the comments on this article and see that what I have stated is 80% obvious somewhere
      13. lelikas 15 October 2015 11: 47 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: atalef
        And that's it, you're a marshall.

        And then what? All at once cease to carry nonsense?

        To the author of the article - if you still do not understand how many children and teenagers are sitting here, for whom this is a really interesting game, then we (teenagers) ((just kidding)) are not to blame.
        Do not like the title - write to admins - they will fix it.
        As the fashion of whining began half a year ago - the Marshals are minus me - there seemed to be five articles, nothing has changed.
        I would be quite satisfied with the midshipman's epaulettes (yes, black) - should I write an article too now?
      14. Ingvar 72 15 October 2015 14: 52 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: atalef
        quote a fictitious quote from Bismarck

        Why fictional? Uncle spawn many clever quotes.
        Quote: atalef
        and of course, walk along the 5th column and the Jews.

        As a rule, representatives of the so-called fifth column are Jews. An accident? It is unlikely that if you look at coincidences from the point of view of Grigory Klimov.
        Well, the rest according to the comment I agree with you, +.
        Well, hello or something, Levoslav! You don’t sin on me, I haven’t put you a minus for a hundred years. Although often disagree. hi
        1. atalef 15 October 2015 16: 49 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Ingvar 72
          Well, hello or something, Levoslav! You don’t sin on me, I haven’t put you a minus for a hundred years. Although often disagree.

          hi
          And you, hello, faithful hi
          1. Ingvar 72 15 October 2015 17: 20 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: atalef
            And you, hello, faithful

            The faithful there are found near you, but I am Orthodox! wink How are you? What is the mood among the Jewish people about our flights near you? Surely people think differently, or how? hi
            P.S. Something Igor67 was gone, is it not in Latakia that it serves MI-24s? His theme. laughing
            1. atalef 15 October 2015 17: 34 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: Ingvar 72
              The faithful there are found near you, but I am Orthodox!

              What difference does it make between Christians and Muslims, Jesus from Judea wink - the son of God or the prophet
              Quote: Ingvar 72
              How are you? What is the mood among the Jewish people about our flights near you?

              Apparently flying together wink
              Russian Defense Ministry: Israeli and Russian pilots train for flights over Syria
              publication time: 16: 31 | latest update: 16: 31 blog printable photo version
              Russian Defense Ministry: Israeli and Russian pilots train for flights over Syria
              Russian and Israeli military pilots began training on Wednesday to ensure flight safety over Syria, an official TASS news agency reported Thursday, October 15, citing a Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Igor Konashenkov.

              "Yesterday, the first stage of the training on the interaction of the aerospace forces of Russia and the Israeli air force took place in the interests of preventing dangerous incidents in the sky of the Syrian Arab Republic. Today will be the second stage of the training with Israeli colleagues," the publication quoted the official as saying.

              According to Konashenkov, the parties inform each other about the actions of the aircraft, using the "hot line" between the Russian aviation control center at the Khmeimim airbase and the Israeli Air Force command post for this purpose.

              On the eve of the Israeli media reported that the command of the Israel Defense Forces and the leadership of the armed forces of the Russian Federation have completed work on the creation of a special structure to coordinate actions in everything related to the operations of Russian aviation in Syria.

              Quote: Ingvar 72
              Surely people think differently, or how?

              Believe me - he does not think in any way. Today the piano does not play
              Quote: Ingvar 72
              P.S. Something Igor67 was gone, is it not in Latakia that it serves MI-24s? His theme.

              Yes, no, today there is his comment on VO.
              1. Ingvar 72 15 October 2015 20: 39 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Quote: atalef
                What difference does it make between Christians and Muslims

                Neither one nor the other Sanya. Orthodox - from the word praise the Right! And there is Reality and Nav. wink
                Quote: atalef
                Believe me - does not think in any way

                belay How's that?
                Quote: atalef
                Yes, no, today there is his comment on VO.

                I didn’t see it, I need to look at the profile. hi
      15. Scraptor 15 October 2015 20: 57 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Everything, after this comment you are not a sergeant again - the “professor” may not cry, the topic of pushing anisemitism always takes out. laughing
        How would you, in the company of other hymenopteran trolls, spend 30 years the output holes from the Su-25 cannon on a Malaysian Boeing would not give out Buk's shrapnel holes for the input 8,4mm ... Although they explained the teke several times.
    5. Finches 15 October 2015 06: 50 New
      • 10
      • 0
      +10
      "Voltaire, Milton and the Panic ..."sagitch "- the famous phrase asks for the language! Just do not call the distinguished, sagitch, me:" a miserable and insignificant person! laughing

      Personally, I have no difference in this VO chip with military ranks - a good brand idea and nothing more! I don’t even see a reason for discussion! I rarely put pluses and even less often minuses, but I’ll gladly put pluses, otherwise judging by the article, you really want a beautiful marshal epaulette for your avatar, and the evil participants of VO do not appreciate you! They wrote an entire article ... laughing

      If you think the comments are stupid and uninteresting - do not read them! Or dilute with your smart and thoughtful comments! No problems!

      Regards hi
      1. Bugor 15 October 2015 07: 11 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Homer was there .... Homer, Milton and Panikovsky. All are blind.
        1. Finches 15 October 2015 07: 33 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Thank you for the amendment! hi

          Indeed, Homer! I’ve confused something in the morning ...!
    6. smershxnumx 15 October 2015 07: 08 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      I support the article. To the author - plus!
    7. tomket 15 October 2015 09: 22 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Ivan Slav
      and many, to get them, say nonsense, and as much as possible!

      Express nonsense okay. The question is, who is adding these nonsense?
    8. perm23 15 October 2015 11: 48 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Well, about the rank, I agree with you. I don’t have anything for me. I had not even looked at it before until a similar article appeared some time ago. Well, someone likes it. Let it be . And as for the discussion of articles and statements - this is, as always, everyone understands in their own way what is written. Therefore, minus and plus. I do not understand that everyone is so against it. Well put me minus what. Maybe I'm wrong or right. I'll think about it.
  3. svp67 15 October 2015 05: 10 New
    • 12
    • 0
    +12
    And the bulk of truly “literate ways” was expressed precisely by “carriers of the high command marks”. And I am 100% sure that our common enemies will certainly take advantage of these “tips” in Syria.
    I can not answer this statement. It does not occur to the author that in order to organize a normal defense it is necessary to calculate as many options as possible for an OPPONENT. So that this knowledge can and will help our enemies, but only if we ourselves do not possess it and, accordingly, we do not think up countermeasures.

    Well, the author wants to stay in the "eternal colonels", maybe the administration will introduce for him a separate title of "retired colonel", in which no changes will be taken into account, but within the rules.
    1. Andrey Yuryevich 15 October 2015 05: 48 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Seryozha, we are Ural people, people are responsive .. help a respected colleague? when meeting in the comments, "sagitch", we will give minuses .... well, the guy asks that we will not help or what? wink hi
      1. EvgNik 15 October 2015 05: 55 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Andrew Y.
        the man asks that we will not help or what?

        But still you need to be able to stay in the rank. Well, not everyone wants to become marshals. Some, having reached a rank, are reset to zero, and start over.
        1. Andrey Yuryevich 15 October 2015 06: 01 New
          • 6
          • 0
          +6
          Quote: EvgNik
          Well, not everyone wants to become marshals. Some, having reached a rank, are reset to zero, and start over.

          like children, by golly ... they are playing titles. what's the difference? they pay a lot of attention to their own person ... do you need a rating or communication with Men, and the opportunity to express your point of view on this or that information?
          1. domokl 15 October 2015 06: 38 New
            • 6
            • 0
            +6
            Hi Andrew. I agree. I have the same opinion. The cubs. Everyone knows very well those who are interested in reading and who can simply be viewed. The title can be confusing only for beginners.
          2. EvgNik 15 October 2015 07: 37 New
            • 10
            • 0
            +10
            Quote: Andrew Y.
            need a rating or communication with Men,

            Rating - a second time. The main thing is the opportunity to express your opinion and the opportunity to know whether you are right or not. There is nothing to agree with, and most importantly: sometimes after reading the comments, you get more information than from the article itself.
            1. perm23 15 October 2015 12: 01 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Yes, for me the main thing is. Read what others write, speak out for yourself. And then sit and ponder. A rating - maybe someone needs it.
              1. Dante Alighieri 15 October 2015 14: 33 New
                • 3
                • 0
                +3
                I support. I registered with VO in December of the 2012, and before that, for about a year and a half, I was just a visitor without a residence permit. Pay attention to my current "rank", which by the way completely suits me. (Like in that song: I served not ranks and not for orders, I don’t like the stars for pulling, But I served the captain’s stars in full. Aty-bats, aty-bats). This is because I rarely allow myself loud statements, preferring to carefully read the replicas of visitors, looking for rational grains missed by the authors and which in general supplement the main texts of the articles. I carefully save the articles I especially carefully and painstakingly save in profile or on the media, so that I can later return to them later. I express myself solely on burning issues, and according to this, I am convinced that bravado, in other words I can’t say, with ranks and ratings, is perfect childishness, which comes mainly from those who came to the site relatively recently (in the year of Crimean Victoria), he grabbed bonuses in a patriotic wave and now in his eyes he appears only as a guru in all aspects of this resource and sincerely wonders why he is "belittled" when it comes not to abstract statements, but, for example, to specific "+" and "- "one or another phenomenon Niya (which itself involves complex formal logic operation). To these comrades I want to say one thing: "Do not despair." Take a look at the Professor - a person who regularly receives minuses according to a number of his convictions, continues to defend them with enviable tenacity, without changing either his principles or himself. What is his honor and praise. hi
                1. Ingvar 72 15 October 2015 15: 31 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  Quote: Dante
                  Take a look at the Professor - a person regularly receives cons on a number of his convictions

                  Sometimes with distinctly noticeable trolling. He has such a trait, for which they minus. I myself put it cons very rarely, only if I really ask, like today -
                  Quote: Professor
                  Two more Iranian generals killed in Syria
                  Pancake. I did not have time to celebrate the previous event, and the good news is like that.
                  Not beautiful, even disgusting. Nobody is dancing with us, after the pockets of another suicide belt at the bus stop explode. A maximum of words like "themselves ran into their policies of the chosen people."
                  Well, I agree with you, although at first I chased the pluses the same, I tried to be the first to be noted. hi
                  1. Dante Alighieri 15 October 2015 16: 31 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    Eh, which of us did not minus the Professor? winked Therefore, he needs to be given some kind of achievement: "For perseverance" or "Resistance, which the Romans envy." Although it’s probably better not to mention the Romans, the invaders of a free Jew and all that laughing .
        2. Uncle VasyaSayapin 15 October 2015 10: 09 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          I think the site attracts readers with these titles. Who cares about communication, rather than titles, may not pay attention to them and the whole business. But since there is a demand for the lack of ranks, they could at will leave people without shoulder straps at all.
  4. RU-Officer 15 October 2015 05: 21 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Author:
    For the reasons stated above, I would prefer to remain in the “officer corps”, and since there is no other way to remain in the so-called “golden middle” (and sometimes you want to express your point of view), you, the users of the site, if not against it, put a minus for article, I will be very grateful to you, otherwise there is not much left to the “general”.

    Yes, don’t worry. So, dear sagitch, what to be - that cannot be avoided. yes . The rules of the “game” are established, the “thought” is in full swing, the “spears” are breaking, people are communicating, learning, developing (well, I would like to think so ... repeat ) Although it’s not a matter of "uniform", but in general - you are right. As Winnie the Pooh turns out: "There is spelling, but it is a little lame" ... laughing And who said that the “colonel” on “VO” is the “golden mean”? what From personal experience I can reassure you - if there is no race for "quantity", and, accordingly, focus on "quality" - then the "Marshal" will not be shining for you soon. stop "What is our life? Game!" hi
  5. Russian063 15 October 2015 05: 22 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Comrade "Colonel" seriously believes that the enemy has not calculated all the ways to destroy the air base? Then we will probably bomb schoolchildren in Syria, not cruel and treacherous terrorists.
  6. dsi
    dsi 15 October 2015 05: 29 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Thought - Surely after the death of Iranian generals in Syria. I read the article, but not you drift. Here the generals are not shot, look around. Wherever you spit in the Marshal you will get. Here I am curious -And the generalissimo will be here?
    1. biznaw 15 October 2015 13: 08 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Exactly. And for this reason I opened the article ...
      Quote: dsi
      Thought - Surely after the death of Iranian generals in Syria. I read the article, but not you drift. Here the generals are not shot, look around. Wherever you spit in the Marshal you will get. Here I am curious -And the generalissimo will be here?
  7. EvgNik 15 October 2015 05: 42 New
    • 9
    • 0
    +9
    I noticed for a long time that although site rules do not allow repetition, some members of our community actively use them, up to the appearance of anecdotes, photos and videos in the comments to one article. But the "gophers" are already sickened up (video - "saw a gopher?"). I won’t say that this is always done on purpose, to raise the rating, sometimes on emotions, or to say something, but there’s nothing to be done. But still, you must try to follow the rules of the site and sometimes refresh them in memory. The spelling is lame, it happens in a hurry and you press the next letter, but not everyone has time to read the comment and correct the errors, but someone is very painful.
    1. igordok 15 October 2015 06: 57 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: EvgNik
      I noticed for a long time that although site rules do not allow repetition, some members of our community actively use them, up to the appearance of anecdotes, photos and videos in the comments for one article.

      Alas, this does not happen intentionally. You’ll put a good, from your point of view, commentary on the comment. Go down lower, look, you're not the only one to think of such a thing. And your koment to remove laziness or is already impossible.
    2. Captain45 15 October 2015 19: 13 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: EvgNik
      And the "gophers" are already sick of it (video - "saw a gopher?").

      On "VO" there are "gophers", as in Instagram laughing The main thing is to insert, and what doesn’t matter.
  8. Kovlad 15 October 2015 05: 45 New
    • 9
    • 0
    +9
    Another nonsense, all careerists, one I'm good! The author, if you are interested in this site, then just read, if interested, participate. And such articles regularly appear.
  9. Baloo 15 October 2015 05: 48 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The author made laugh. laughing
  10. Wolka 15 October 2015 05: 56 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    I agree with the author, with the army ranks of the participants of the VO forum it’s obviously too much, it would be more correct to introduce certain orders, medals, bows, swords and other attributes of “military valor” ... soldier
    1. Alexander Romanov 15 October 2015 06: 12 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      Quote: Volka
      it would be more correct to introduce certain orders, medals, bows, swords and other attributes of "military valor"

      Star of the Hero of Russia against your nickname, avatar in the iconostasis lol
      1. Andrey Yuryevich 15 October 2015 06: 24 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Star Hero of Russia against your nickname, avatar in the iconostasis

        and if the "ban" is posthumous ...? belay lol
      2. atalef 15 October 2015 06: 31 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Quote: Volka
        it would be more correct to introduce certain orders, medals, bows, swords and other attributes of "military valor"

        Star of the Hero of Russia against your nickname, avatar in the iconostasis lol

        And can foreign ones be? An order of garter, bathhouse or exotic - although a problem, some part is clearly required - swords, diamonds or oak leaves to the cross.
        1. Alexander Romanov 15 October 2015 06: 35 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          Quote: atalef
          Order of the garter, bathhouse or exotic - although the problem

          Will you catch the garter wassat Imported wink
          1. kagorta 15 October 2015 11: 28 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            This is not a garter.
          2. kagorta 15 October 2015 15: 36 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            This is a garter, she holds a stocking. And you have a stocking belt in the picture.
        2. Baloo 15 October 2015 07: 21 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          As for bruliks, more can be, such as how much? wassat
          1. Scraptor 15 October 2015 21: 43 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            only for cryptocurrency, and for preferential price - 1 ruble = 1dollar (Deja Vu) wink
        3. Buffalo 15 October 2015 09: 04 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Do you want the dunce order? - Foreign!
          Do you recall De Funes?
        4. Bekas1967 15 October 2015 09: 08 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Some would have crossed the crosses at the right time.
        5. Good me 15 October 2015 09: 18 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: atalef
          And can foreign ones be? Order of a garter, bathhouse or exotic - although a problem, some part will be clearly demanded - swords, diamonds or oak leaves to the cross.


          Crosses made of oak ...
        6. Scraptor 15 October 2015 21: 22 New
          • -1
          • 0
          -1
          Yes, especially to you ... and with acorns so that the rudel is not conceited.
          or with a swastika winked
      3. EvgNik 15 October 2015 07: 45 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Star of Hero of Russia against your nickname

        Why is a star necessary? State awards to distribute are allowed only to the government. You have to draw your own ones (to announce a competition).
        1. Alexander Romanov 15 October 2015 08: 44 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: EvgNik
          . You have to draw your own ones (to announce a competition).

          There is nothing to do more administration.
    2. venaya 15 October 2015 06: 18 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      with the army ranks of the participants of the VO forum, it’s obviously too much, it would be more correct to introduce certain orders, medals, bows, swords and other attributes of “military valor” ... soldier

      You can imagine how much less interest in this case will be in such an entertaining game. The effort to decline, comments will become faded. I am not against changes, but only towards improvements, but experience shows that, as a rule: "the best is the enemy of the good."
    3. Kuzyakin15 15 October 2015 06: 55 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      [quote = Volka] I agree with the author, with the army ranks of the participants of the VO forum it’s obviously too much, it would be more correct to introduce certain orders, medals, bows, swords and other attributes of “military valor” ... soldier[where does the title, insignia, medals?
      Just interesting to read, communication ...
      The men here are mostly thinking, competent, professionals, each in their field. Interesting! It is interesting to read opinions, even if I completely disagree.
      In my opinion, there is great luxury in VO, the luxury of living human communication. And the titles ... Adult men always remain a little children and continue to play war games
      / Quote]
    4. EvgNik 15 October 2015 07: 39 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Volka
      it would be more correct to introduce certain orders, medals, bows, swords and other attributes of "military prowess".

      What a good idea.
      1. Good me 15 October 2015 15: 39 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: EvgNik
        Quote: Volka
        it would be more correct to introduce certain orders, medals, bows, swords and other attributes of "military prowess".

        What a good idea.


        Do you nefig. Bows ... Ryushechki ... Homosapiences, damn it.
  11. Uncle lee 15 October 2015 06: 00 New
    • 11
    • 0
    +11
    -How good to be a general, how good to be a general!
    Better work, but I won’t name the Signora.
    I will be just a general, I will become a general,
    If the corporal, if the corporal survive! lol
    1. Andrey Yuryevich 15 October 2015 06: 25 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Uncle Lee
      -How good to be a general, how good to be a general!
      Better work, but I won’t name the Signora.
      I will be just a general, I will become a general,
      If the corporal, if the corporal survive! lol

      + I remembered my childhood, my mother’s records ... hi
      1. Uncle lee 15 October 2015 09: 22 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Corporal except minus left no arguments fool
        1. Uncle lee 15 October 2015 16: 18 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          Wow! The corporal was raging! Not smart and mean. hi
    2. afdjhbn67 15 October 2015 11: 03 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Uncle Lee
      -How good to be a general, how good to be a general!
      Better work, but I won’t name the Signora.
      I will be just a general, I will become a general,
      If the corporal, if the corporal survive! lol


      I recalled the army saying - the general is not a rank, the general is happiness .. laughing
  12. Russian Uzbek 15 October 2015 06: 13 New
    • -16
    • 0
    -16
    "" Marshalov is increasing, and the quality of comments is falling ""
    and what do you want from the "yellow" site?
    1. Alexander Romanov 15 October 2015 06: 19 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      Quote: Russian Uzbek
      and what do you want from the "yellow" site?

      Do not like the sit, go to another.
    2. dsi
      dsi 15 October 2015 06: 28 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quality goes into quantity. The conclusion is a tightening of the site’s policy. It follows that the number of users will be reduced. Do you need this? ...
      1. Alexander Romanov 15 October 2015 06: 38 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: dsi
        The conclusion is a tightening of the site’s policy.

        Conclusion, you do not know anything about the politics of Sait!
        Quote: dsi
        It follows that the number of users will be reduced. Do you need this? ...

        It only grows and does not fall.
        1. dsi
          dsi 15 October 2015 07: 28 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Conclusion, you do not know anything about the politics of Sait!

          I suppose you know everything! So enlighten. sad
      2. Buffalo 15 October 2015 08: 54 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        And why is a democratic system bad when everyone is equal in the discussion?
        Marshals on the forum, from which ripples in their eyes, resemble a bathhouse, where people shine not with their bare ass, but with orders. laughing
    3. forester 15 October 2015 06: 34 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Quote: Russian Uzbek
      and what do you want from the "yellow" site

      Then why are you here? go to some other blue one
    4. Andrey Yuryevich 15 October 2015 06: 53 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Russian Uzbek
      "" Marshalov is increasing, and the quality of comments is falling ""
      and what do you want from the "yellow" site?

      shit on the "censor", he is "yellow-black"! laughing
    5. EvgNik 15 October 2015 07: 48 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Russian Uzbek
      and what do you want from the "yellow" site?

      You yourself are yellow, with blue.
    6. Turkir 15 October 2015 10: 03 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      It doesn’t matter what we want.
      The main thing you want.
    7. The comment was deleted.
    8. Tambov Wolf 15 October 2015 14: 35 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Why do you think that the site is “yellow”? On the “yellow” sites of the coward Fili Kirkorov and bra Alla Pugacheva discuss. And here there are discussions of foreign and domestic policy, a review of weapons, historical excursions and much more, about which on the “yellow” sites and never heard of. Of course, if you like how the priest of Moses differs from the priest of Penkin, then here you definitely will not find it.
  13. populist 15 October 2015 06: 22 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    put a minus for the article, I will be very grateful to you, otherwise there is not much left for the "general".

    The author does not know what you can get the cons?
    The opinion of the author always coincides with the opinion of the majority, with the trend?
    I would have spoken out several times against it, you look, and you would have gotten “skulls”.
    One could speak out against the discussion of the base, sharply against it.
    And a bunch of cons in your pocket
    1. Uncle VasyaSayapin 15 October 2015 11: 04 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      The author wants to pick up the pros, not the minuses. Just don't know how. Most people consider themselves to be the most ... Just like no luck. And I think that you need to be simpler, to perceive life as it is and not to bother with all kinds of nonsense.
  14. sl22277 15 October 2015 06: 27 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    If I don’t like some kind of statement, comment, but it does not contain lies, insults or anti-Russian statements, I just pass by. But if I liked the comment I want to support the author’s point of view, I put a plus. And the majority opinion does not bother me at all. Regarding the rank on the site, this only confirms once again that the person’s comments are relevant, interesting, sometimes controversial, there is a discussion, sometimes a debate. But a forum has been created for that. PS If Marshall wrote: "Death to the Fascists," this does not mean that I do not support him, I support him, I simply do not value him.
  15. Yellow 15 October 2015 06: 29 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    And how can one become a general on the forum, or at least a colonel?
    1. atalef 15 October 2015 06: 34 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Yellow
      And how can one become a general on the forum, or at least a colonel?

      Ask Vatnik, he will explain hi
      1. Andrey Yuryevich 15 October 2015 07: 01 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: atalef
        Quote: Yellow
        And how can one become a general on the forum, or at least a colonel?

        Ask Vatnik, he will explain hi

        to "Mikhan" in a "personal" -enlighten! yes laughing
        1. Manul 15 October 2015 10: 31 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Andrew Y.
          to "Mikhan" in a "personal" -enlighten!

          belay What are you, Yurich?
          Yellow, you in no case do not listen to this wit! Mikhan will teach you only one thing - without the People’s Commissar 100 grams, even Samantha Power will be attractive to sin! wassat
          1. evil partisan 15 October 2015 10: 38 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: Manul
            Mikhan will teach you only one thing - without 100 grams of the People’s Commissar, to desire any scary chick, even Samantha Power!

            This is how unhealthy sensations are born request... What is Samantha ?? fool Meehan fuse love on psaku !! yes
            And not after 100g., But after a liter, and not the People’s Commissars, but Martel ... winked
            1. Andrey Yuryevich 15 October 2015 11: 59 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              This is how unhealthy sensations are born request... What is Samantha ?? fool Meehan fuse love on psaku !! yes
              And not after 100g., But after a liter, and not the People’s Commissars, but Martel ... winked[/ Quote]
              Plus you sclerosing partisans, for a quality amendment! yes
            2. Ingvar 72 15 October 2015 15: 42 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              Quote: wicked partisan
              Meehan crush on Psaku !!

              When did he, adulter? am But what about the promise to blow Vasilyeva?
              1. evil partisan 15 October 2015 16: 54 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Quote: Ingvar 72
                he promised to blow Vasilyeva! Only now something is going for a long time. Or do we not know something?

                What would you, Colleague, know Mikhan and Vasiliev from one city - Orenburg yes.
                After the first promises of Meehan to blow sad as you deigned, Vasilyeva abruptly turned to the opposition to Putin yes and dumped in Ukraine. yes So the process of inflating is not possible request for purely technical reasons. Not yet possible ... winked
                1. Captain45 15 October 2015 19: 20 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  Quote: wicked partisan
                  What would you, Colleague, know Mikhan and Vasiliev from one city - Orenburg

                  A colleague, but you don’t confuse about Vasilyeva? As far as I remember, she is from Murmansk, she still owes a lot of housing and communal services to a local housing office (why she dumped him on the outskirts, the court went to trial), and Orenburg attributed to her because that she gave the list of the Orenburg football team "Gazovik" as a list of soldiers of the RF Armed Forces who died in the Donbass
                  1. evil partisan 15 October 2015 19: 44 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    Quote: Captain45
                    As far as I remember, she is from Murmansk,

                    what
                    Hmmm sad ... Well, then Meehan got it there too yes .
                  2. Andrey Yuryevich 16 October 2015 04: 12 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    Quote: Captain45
                    that she gave the list of the Orenburg football team "Gazovik" as a list of soldiers of the Russian Armed Forces who died in the Donbass

                    you're talking about different basil ....
                    1. evil partisan 16 October 2015 06: 03 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      Quote: Andrew Y.
                      you're talking about different basil ....

                      Those. You, Colleague, suspect that Mikhan is simply excited by the name of Vasiliev? what And I thought: why did they keep Serdyukov’s girlfriend for so long under house arrest? And it’s over there that ... By the way. If suddenly Meehan wants Samantha, then he needs to hurry, otherwise they will lead away:
                    2. Captain45 16 October 2015 09: 47 New
                      • 1
                      • 0
                      +1
                      Quote: Andrew Y.
                      Quote: Captain45
                      that she gave the list of the Orenburg football team "Gazovik" as a list of soldiers of the Russian Armed Forces who died in the Donbass

                      you're talking about different basil ....

                      Possibly. They, entich Vasilyevs, now like guano after a bath and all have something to do with it. No wonder and confuse requestWhether it’s the case in the early days, they will put the stamp of the BOP on the forehead, you won’t confuse who stole and who buried laughing
        2. Ingvar 72 15 October 2015 15: 40 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Andrew Y.
          to "Mikhan" in a "personal" -enlighten!

          Himself so! wink And in general, do not drive against Mikhan, he promised to blow Vasilyeva! repeat Only now something is going for a long time. Or do we not know something? request
          And for the experience of gaining a rating, ideally, you need to send Thoughts to the Giant! laughing
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. Alexander Romanov 15 October 2015 06: 45 New
      • 12
      • 0
      +12
      Quote: Yellow
      And how can one become a general on the forum, or at least a colonel?

      1. Change the flag to Israeli.
      2. Often write well about the US president.
      3. Stay democratic values.
      And you will be happy wink
      1. atalef 15 October 2015 07: 25 New
        • 8
        • 0
        +8
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Quote: Yellow
        And how can one become a general on the forum, or at least a colonel?

        1. Change the flag to Israeli.
        2. Often write well about the US president.
        3. Stay democratic values.
        And you will be happy wink

        With the help of about such wishes, Eve slipped off an apple and ... now we suffer.
        1. Alexey Lobanov 15 October 2015 09: 28 New
          • 7
          • 0
          +7
          Quote: atalef
          Eve chucked an apple and ... now we suffer


          "-Adam! Well, do you feel sorry for the ribs !?
          - No, God, I’m not sorry! Just a hunch some bad ... "
      2. Buffalo 15 October 2015 09: 01 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        1. Change the flag to Israeli.
        2. Often write well about the US president.
        3. Stay democratic values.
        And you will be happy wink

        Something I do not see happiness on atalef's face, although he has something similar in abundance. laughing
        1. Uncle VasyaSayapin 15 October 2015 11: 08 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          This is humor. A list of what you do not need to do.
        2. atalef 15 October 2015 12: 53 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Bison
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          1. Change the flag to Israeli.
          2. Often write well about the US president.
          3. Stay democratic values.
          And you will be happy wink

          Something I do not see happiness on atalef's face, although he has something similar in abundance. laughing

          What is due to Jupiter. Not allowed to a bull
          1. Buffalo 15 October 2015 13: 16 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            As they say in the army:
            - The laid .... laughing
    3. Turkir 15 October 2015 10: 05 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Depends on the number of your comments and pluses-endorsements to your thoughts.
    4. evil partisan 15 October 2015 10: 39 New
      • -1
      • 0
      -1
      Quote: Yellow
      And how can one become a general on the forum, or at least a colonel?

      Right now, I'll unsubscribe to you - how ... yes
  16. populist 15 October 2015 06: 33 New
    • -2
    • 0
    -2
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    Quote: Ivan Slav
    Even evaluating articles, many, not understanding the essence of the article,

    Firstly, percent of 90, they read only the headline and the maximum is the last paragraph.
    And secondly, things will change soon hi

    1 It is very interesting how things will change. The rating problem seems unsolvable.
    2 Sometimes it is enough to read only the heading and the fallacy of the author’s reasoning is already clear.
    1. Alexander Romanov 15 October 2015 06: 50 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: populist
      The rating problem seems unsolvable.

      Even as solved.
      Quote: populist
      2 Sometimes it is enough to read only the heading and the fallacy of the author’s reasoning is already clear.

      Do you rate books by title too?
      1. populist 15 October 2015 23: 07 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Still as solved

        Intrigued!
        Do you rate books by title too?

        Books also have authors.
        If you read the books of Isaev, Mukhin, Kara-Murza, Zinoviev, Delyagin, then there is a certain guarantee of quality.
    2. EvgNik 15 October 2015 07: 55 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: populist
      Sometimes it’s enough to read only the heading and the author’s reasoning is already clear.

      And sometimes the content of an article is exactly the opposite of the title. So it’s better to read the articles and not the headings.
      1. populist 15 October 2015 23: 24 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        EvgNik
        And sometimes the content of an article is exactly the opposite of the title. So it’s better to read the articles and not the headings.

        So then it is, but it is reasonable to object; what can the author of the article write if he failed to reflect his topic or main idea in the title?
  17. mr.vasilievich 15 October 2015 06: 37 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Too many cheers-patriotic comments, almost meaningless. Little responsibility.
    1. Andrey Yuryevich 15 October 2015 07: 03 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: mr.vasilievich
      Too many cheers-patriotic comments, almost meaningless. Little responsibility.

      there are Rules for this, but in general the topic is already as old as the world: http: //topwar.ru/77943-commentarii-k-state-o-.html
  18. sl22277 15 October 2015 06: 43 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Russian Uzbek
    "" Marshalov is increasing, and the quality of comments is falling ""
    and what do you want from the "yellow" site?


    I don’t think that you wanted to offend the site, you simply formulated your thoughts incorrectly in two ways. Therefore, they picked up the minuses, apparently the word "Yellow" - in the figurative sense of the word.
  19. Baloo 15 October 2015 06: 45 New
    • 18
    • 0
    +18
    put a minus for the article, I will be very grateful to you, otherwise there is not much left for the "general".

    Yo ... real colonel! I propose introducing the title of “Honorary Colonel”, “Odd Colonel”, “Not yet Colonel”, “Already Colonel”. Mark type of medal, badge.

    Well, but seriously ... Here, military and civilian people exchange opinions, and someone conducts a meticulous multivariate analysis for themselves of events, phenomena, facts. What is VO for me? It’s like a tuning fork, where I compare my vision of what is happening in Russia, around Russia, against Russia with the public. The flying trolls here try to bend their line ... But the bears do not react to insects until the number of them exceeds a critical value. For me, this is a site of like-minded people and humor, even if not always e ... delicate, I welcome. Yellowness? In what? The conversational style prevails over the literary. So philologists have been periodically bouncing around and trying to reform the Russian language, although I personally am against it. I consider the VO site to be quite democratic, taking this opportunity, I thank the authors and moderators for their work, which allows us to communicate. hi
    Ps: be mutually polite, do not turn discussions into an exchange of spits and a bazaar.
    Politeness is a sign of the power of thought and play of the mind.
    1. MIKHAN 15 October 2015 07: 01 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Well spoken Baloo! hi I join completely.
    2. Rurikovich 15 October 2015 08: 28 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Balu
      Ps: be mutually polite, do not turn discussions into an exchange of spits and a bazaar.
      Politeness is a sign of the power of thought and play of the mind.

      I absolutely agree and fully support good And then a lot of "familiarists" began to appear, who, not seeing a person, not understanding the meaning of what was said, begin to familiarize themselves with a periodic transition to a banal expansion with spraying snot winked
      It is disgusting. We are Russian people, not some Western “it” lol
      hi
    3. Bekas1967 15 October 2015 09: 12 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      And also self-righteousness. What is the strength, brother? .....
  20. free 15 October 2015 06: 47 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    make me ordinary!
    1. Alexander Romanov 15 October 2015 06: 51 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: free
      make me ordinary!

      And what's the use of building up the pros and becoming a general again.
    2. Baloo 15 October 2015 07: 08 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Ordinary general divan troops agree? Telegraph urgently to the General Staff of divan troops. bully
  21. MIKHAN 15 October 2015 06: 48 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    I would tell the author of the article how to stay a colonel, but I won’t ..... (some comrades will be offended)))))
    And there have already been a lot of such articles on the site ... I call them silent articles about myself! hi
  22. The comment was deleted.
  23. mamont5 15 October 2015 07: 05 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    "For the reasons stated above, I would prefer to remain in the" officers ""

    Does this title give you anything? This is not the first time that such a question has been raised, but what exactly is to be done? Either review and evaluate EVERY comment, which is physically impossible even for the army of moderators, or ... ignore these ranks. And if you want to make an opinion about a person, then look at him and his statements specifically.
    And as regards the issuance of "military secrets", then ... I doubt it very much. Then it should be forbidden to publish numerous detective and spy literature, otherwise, there, sometimes, SUCH advice can be gleaned. Which, incidentally, is what the CIA does, if, of course, the book "Condor" 6 days is believed.
  24. askort154 15 October 2015 07: 18 New
    • 10
    • 0
    +10
    To the pensioner in the winter, the Internet is an outlet. "Traveling" on all sites, as in space.
    But most of all "pulls" on VO. Why? It’s just that it draws here like in a warm dwelling on a cold day.
    filth and come here to "recharge." Naturally, this is not an “Olympus”, but where is it ?! And we are not “geniuses” here.
    I cast a quick glance at the "ranks" to determine the "experience" of the participant. I don’t put any disadvantages in principle (maybe a couple jumped out by mistake). It is especially comfortable here on holidays and holidays - there is no smell, no ringing of glasses, and the mood is like in a sauna, the spirit of a single team is felt. Thanks to the organizers of the site. Well, skeptics and whiners
    always have been, are and will be, as in any collective. The world would have long gone mad if there had been a majority.
  25. Grim Reaper 15 October 2015 07: 36 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Again raised the issue of color differentiation of pants. ☺
  26. Mikhail Krapivin 15 October 2015 07: 56 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Ivan Slav
    Even evaluating the articles, many, not understanding the essence of the article, but highlighting individual phrases, taking it out of context, begin to judge and put pros or cons.


    But wasn’t it always and everywhere?
  27. Roust 15 October 2015 08: 19 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Frankly, only it smells of PR. But! Everyone has a strictly personal opinion, and striving to "earn" on this highly respected site "rank" is childishness.
  28. Stinger 15 October 2015 08: 24 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The author is right. When collecting proposals for improving the site, among other proposals, it was proposed to exclude these children's ranks. I think it was the right offer. Gradually, VO turns into a computer game - who first reaches the highest level.
    1. Banshee 15 October 2015 09: 05 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      The first was Romanov ...
      1. MIKHAN 15 October 2015 10: 04 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: Banshee
        The first was Romanov ...

        Nobody will catch A. Romanov .. I tried)))) I don’t want to! crying
      2. Captain45 16 October 2015 09: 57 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Banshee
        The first was Romanov ...

        How is Adam, then who is Eve? lol I remember the women were present on the site in greater numbers, now it’s mainly Egoza (Elena), the rest can be seen by the life of her husband, whitewash, children laughing
    2. Hleb 15 October 2015 09: 07 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Well, along with opinions on improving the site, there was also harvesting precisely by rating and shoulder straps. polls were created, and the majority voted in favor of the format that we see today. That is, the majority then arranged pros / cons and stars, and at the request of the "Bolsheviks" the result. on the old forum all this was immortalized, but it was cleaned up.
      but in general VO also likes it) how long have these topics come up periodically and recruits are reminiscent of the good old Military Review.
      PS
      Roma writes that the first was Romanov ... really?
      1. Alexander Romanov 15 October 2015 11: 05 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: Gleb
        Roma writes that the first was Romanov ... really?

        Lies Banshee like a gray Meren
        1. MIKHAN 15 October 2015 11: 38 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Quote: Gleb
          Roma writes that the first was Romanov ... really?

          Lies Banshee like a gray Meren

          Sasha, but you’re not afraid of warnings ..)))) laughing
  29. Terminolol 15 October 2015 08: 49 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    There are really not enough competent comments in the news section. It happens that any patriotic vyser in the forefront gains a bunch of likes, when a thoughtful comment reflecting the opinion of the author gains dislikes just because it does not coincide with the majority opinion.
    It infuriates when minus interesting articles (news) only because they are not patriotic, not understanding or forgetting why this minus is needed.
  30. Old26 15 October 2015 08: 50 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: venaya
    How I personally experience it. As soon as a comment essentially requires thinking, endless minuses immediately fly.

    Not necessary. Of course there is such an option, but sometimes it’s minus for the fact that your comment is contrary to the opinion of the minus.

    Quote: Rav075
    I completely agree! Express your own opinion on the article or the issue under discussion, and instead of the discussion you get a "-". Trying to explain further, and here .... ATU ITS, ATU !!! After that, there is no desire to comment on anything for a few days

    And you "hammer" on all these minuses. There are always adequate people on the site who not only support the discussion, but sometimes discover something new for you that you don’t know (and nobody knows everything about everything). Do not pay attention to the "cons", especially if you yourself are 100% sure that you wrote. Just a "minus" says that "promoted" you - as they say "not in the subject" (although self-conceit and self-esteem can go off scale for him).

    Quote: Good I
    Another “reverse process” is also possible, which is confirmed by practice: the user begins to troll by pulling the interlocutor into a discussion on favorable terms for himself, using the “ARE PROVE!” Technique, while unceremoniously touching on topics of religion, interethnic relations and other “sick” issues ...

    I always used and use one rule. And here and on other sites / forums. "If you do not want to receive an enemy (enemy), never talk with strangers about three things: about women, religion and football"
    Therefore, participation in discussions on political branches is minimized. I prefer to talk about hardware
  31. Million 15 October 2015 08: 51 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    No wonder they say that brevity is the sister of talent! To read the multi-page thoughts of a person who is in no way involved in military service, or to the army in general, building its conclusions on unverified information from the Internet, no, thank you!
    PS.A title can be canceled
  32. akudr48 15 October 2015 08: 51 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Marshals added, and the quality of comments falls.

    Yes it is. Thanks to the author for paying attention.
    While the portal allows you to specify only the quantity of the type “like - dislike” on any comment on the quality.

    One more indicator should be introduced - the quality of the commentary, since there are very reasoned and detailed remarks that are clearly useful, but which you disagree with, for example, for ideological reasons.
    Then it would be possible to put "-" in the existing rating, and, nevertheless, put "+" for the content or quality of the comment.

    Since everyone here is part of the divan troops, and there are mishandled Cossacks and traitors in the troops, it would be useful to introduce the sign “friend or foe” with criteria such as “patriot”, “liberal”, “statesman”, “market man” or immediately "5th column", etc.
    Thus, the community of the portal would automatically be structured according to the specified criteria into divisions, regiments and battalions of their own and others.

    There is much to offer without getting off the couch.
    For example, sending, if necessary, companies of their patriots to the enemy’s websites, say on ECHO MOSCOW, to scout the situation and restore order there by force of argument.
    Or put the HBO team on a tank biathlon if HBO is a thinking tank, which is indisputable, in my opinion. Rogozin will be stunned looking at our victories ...
    1. MIKHAN 15 October 2015 10: 30 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: akudr48
      Since everyone here is part of the divan troops, and there are mishandled Cossacks and traitors in the troops, it would be useful to introduce the sign “friend or foe” with criteria such as “patriot”, “liberal”, “statesman”, “market man” or immediately "5th column", etc.

      Someone here long ago suggested introducing a “shoot button ..” Laughter with laughter, but the essence is in it! bully
      1. alicante11 15 October 2015 11: 53 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Someone here long ago suggested introducing a “shoot button ..” Laughter with laughter, but the essence is in it!


        So ban on what? Just the three moderators are ready. So everything is according to the "laws of war."
      2. Manul 15 October 2015 12: 02 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Someone here long ago suggested introducing a “shoot button ..” Laughter with laughter, but the essence is in it!

        laughing Are the outfits out of turn?
        Maybe there is not enough elementary star shooting? Tucked up, minus a star without talking - this will be a warning. If it’s completely ordinary, it’s too much and not vital somehow, and it is used in very rare cases. And if you take off one at a time, this can often be brought up.
        1. MIKHAN 15 October 2015 12: 26 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          Quote: Manul
          Quote: MIKHAN
          Someone here long ago suggested introducing a “shoot button ..” Laughter with laughter, but the essence is in it!

          laughing Are the outfits out of turn?
          Maybe there is not enough elementary star shooting? Tucked up, minus a star without talking - this will be a warning. If it’s completely ordinary, it’s too much and not vital somehow, and it is used in very rare cases. And if you take off one at a time, this can often be brought up.

          Well so me "without trial or investigation", shoulder straps tore off and demoted to an ordinary rating for lyam was in the "Zindan" a month in June for a month ... In August, a heart attack from thunder and grief slammed ... laughing laughing laughing Now he’s calm (sometimes he puts it on turns) So men don’t chase the rating .. Write what you think and analyze .. They always read good comments! hi
          1. Manul 15 October 2015 12: 49 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: MIKHAN

            Well so I was "without trial or investigation", shoulder straps tore off and demoted to an ordinary rating for lyam was in the "Zindan" a month in June for a month ... In August, a heart attack from bum and grief banged ... Now it’s calm (well, sometimes it brings on bends) So guys do not chase the rating .. Write what you think and analyze .. Good comments always read!

            belay You, that .. You need to protect your health. Although I understand you - I have a similar situation in my life - after the affair I was expelled from the council where I had been for many years .. He grabbed my heart. So it’s heartless and cruel - to ban people and rip off shoulder straps, especially without warning. And I gave you a plus in the rating a long time ago, you’ve been a well-deserved marshal hi
            1. MIKHAN 15 October 2015 13: 34 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Quote: Manul
              Quote: MIKHAN

              Well so I was "without trial or investigation", shoulder straps tore off and demoted to an ordinary rating for lyam was in the "Zindan" a month in June for a month ... In August, a heart attack from bum and grief banged ... Now it’s calm (well, sometimes it brings on bends) So guys do not chase the rating .. Write what you think and analyze .. Good comments always read!

              belay You, that .. You need to protect your health. Although I understand you - I have a similar situation in my life - after the affair I was expelled from the council where I had been for many years .. He grabbed my heart. So it’s heartless and cruel - to ban people and rip off shoulder straps, especially without warning. And I gave you a plus in the rating a long time ago, you’ve been a well-deserved marshal hi

              Thank you Ilya! hi Take care of your heart .. Good luck!
    2. Uncle VasyaSayapin 15 October 2015 11: 24 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      I think not everyone wants to enroll in divisions, regiments, battalions. And introducing their traitors among their "liberals" is already cool. Almost like a computer game. You still forgot to divide people into white and red, nationalists and internationalists, Zaputinists and all-props. And beat the pros and cons to stupor. Sofa on the sofa. Tryndets.
  33. ASK505 15 October 2015 08: 55 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    Article in essence. A plus. The level of communication needs to be raised. And "ranks," as someone aptly remarked earlier, are "no more than feathers from the nth place."
    1. MIKHAN 15 October 2015 10: 38 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: ASK505
      And "ranks," as someone aptly remarked earlier, are "no more than feathers from the nth place."

      I was plucked, it was so luxurious ... laughing
    2. alicante11 15 October 2015 11: 55 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Article in essence. A plus. The level of communication needs to be raised.


      Again the question is - how? The fascists were determined by the shape of the skull, the Jews are determined by the inimitable "grassing" in the word "times." And how will we determine the level of the visitor at VO?
  34. Oleko 15 October 2015 09: 24 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    For the reasons stated above, I would prefer to remain in the “officer corps”, and since there is no other way to remain in the so-called “golden middle” (and sometimes you want to express your point of view), you, the users of the site, if not against it, put a minus for article, I will be very grateful to you, otherwise there is not much left to the “general”.

    "How good it is to be a general, how good it is to be a general, I’m better than you to work, Senora I won’t name ..." The impression is that many were carried away and began to take the simple game of stars and epaulets seriously. I read VO and comments with pleasure. But the trouble is, in the purse of a civilian pensioner with the military specialty "Barrier and Mine Clearance" from the rank of foreman and sergeant absolutely nothing will be added. Therefore - the matter of time, fun hour. I get off the couch and go to the yoga complex I'll scroll. Good deal. I’ve been doing it for 25 years. Saving on drugs and not having to go to the doctors is worth it. And the missus brought the projection. It is necessary to "force" and light in a three-story house to do. 18 apartments. So, forum users, all the best to you.
  35. 2s1122 15 October 2015 09: 39 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I don’t know, my opinion is all right. Comments should be essentially based on personal experience and knowledge, but with humor.
  36. kirpich 15 October 2015 09: 43 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    And secondly, things will change soon



    I want to believe. Ah, then the rules say one thing, but in fact ... request
  37. MIKHAN 15 October 2015 09: 56 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    If anyone does not want to be a general, contact us, we decide ... We will agree! bully
  38. Jackking 15 October 2015 10: 03 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The article is correct. The only remark is that those who have marshal and general stars are most likely to relate to the divan troops of Russia in terms of military experience. Or simply put, having seen enough of the movies, they flush with their "knowledge" in tact and strategy on the forum ...
    1. Turkir 15 October 2015 10: 13 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      The only remark is that those who have marshal and general stars are most likely to relate to the divan troops of Russia in terms of military experience.

      I think the current generals are busy with other things or not?
  39. Ignatius 15 October 2015 10: 21 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: akudr48
    Marshals added, and the quality of comments falls.

    Yes it is. Thanks to the author for paying attention.
    While the portal allows you to specify only the quantity of the type “like - dislike” on any comment on the quality.

    One more indicator should be introduced - the quality of the commentary, since there are very reasoned and detailed remarks that are clearly useful, but which you disagree with, for example, for ideological reasons.
    Then it would be possible to put "-" in the existing rating, and, nevertheless, put "+" for the content or quality of the comment.

    Since everyone here is part of the divan troops, and there are mishandled Cossacks and traitors in the troops, it would be useful to introduce the sign “friend or foe” with criteria such as “patriot”, “liberal”, “statesman”, “market man” or immediately "5th column", etc.
    Thus, the community of the portal would automatically be structured according to the specified criteria into divisions, regiments and battalions of their own and others.

    There is much to offer without getting off the couch.
    For example, sending, if necessary, companies of their patriots to the enemy’s websites, say on ECHO MOSCOW, to scout the situation and restore order there by force of argument.
    Or put the HBO team on a tank biathlon if HBO is a thinking tank, which is indisputable, in my opinion. Rogozin will be stunned looking at our victories ...


    Very constructive suggestions. The organizers and moderators of the site should think about their implementation.
  40. Anatole Klim 15 October 2015 10: 24 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Such articles really regularly appear on the VO website, I’m already reading the third in two years and they’ll probably continue to appear, because new participants come and they seem to care about this issue, the author only registered in the summer. I think that this childhood illness will get big shoulder straps gradually, and the site colleagues will stop paying attention to these virtual shoulder straps and will pay attention to the essence of the comment, so I have colleagues whose comments I always read with respect and support shoulder straps they are different, but I don’t and never will have a black list.
    I’ll say a few words about Uri patriots with slogan comments, they too annoyed me at first, but then I thought, what if it’s just a schoolboy who went to the site and, in fact, he can’t write anything but slogans, and then there’s big guys with big shoulder straps they took it and put it in a corner (zamusunuyut, and even laughed), because we were all young and did not immediately learn to think, and so involuntarily he will begin to read articles and comments, think, analyze. And so, this guy leaves the site and ends up on some liberal site, where he will be bombed with brains and watch, another fan of false values ​​has appeared. Let's be tolerant, or something. I have always been an opponent of turning the VO site into a narrow club of great experts.
  41. Buffalo 15 October 2015 11: 07 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    I read an article by sagitch about the reluctance to grow in the rank, remembered a joke about Brezhnev.
    Citizens communicate with the Secretary General. One asks:
    - Leonid Ilyich, I heard that you traveled the whole world and collected all the awards. Brezhnev in response:
    - Yes, I have been to almost all countries. As for the awards, then here you are mistaken. I even recently had to refuse one of the highest awards of the African state!
    - What is this award?
    - A nose ring.
  42. Abbra 15 October 2015 11: 10 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    I would have given the order in the place of the creators of VO ... For Wisdom, For Wit, For Stupidity ... There’s a lot to come up with. fellow
  43. Old warrior 15 October 2015 12: 48 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Seriously measured by the epaulettes - ridiculously and stupid.
  44. The Sparkle 15 October 2015 13: 22 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    These ratings must be weighty or they become ridiculous.
    To give officer ranks only if you write articles for the site - for labor / service / contribution to the development of the site.
    And the rest / like me / let them run in the rank from private to foreman.
    And in general, I did not serve - "unfit in peace ...". Can then take off my epaulettes? It will be quite comfortable for me in ordinary users.)))
    Moderators can also make a distinction from simply writing articles for the forum - how the guard differs from the combined arms unit.
    I had the status of a moderator on one of the sites, and I know this is hard work! But about warrant officers do not come up with ...)))
    That's all...)))
    The thought broke off.)))
    1. MIKHAN 15 October 2015 13: 41 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Flame
      The thought broke off.)))

      Sorry .... I would still read ..)))) laughing
  45. Tambov Wolf 15 October 2015 14: 47 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Likes, pros, cons, speakers, generals, etc. etc. On some sites, sales are underway, on others it is necessary to get into the stream in accordance with the line. And maybe, as old Famusov said from an immortal work, a little paraphrase: - “If evil stopped, I would collect (likes, minuses , pluses, etc.), and burn it. "
    1. Landwarrior 15 October 2015 15: 16 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Yes, it’s been noticed for a long time, how karma is fastened to the resource, the pursuit of pluses begins hi
      (although, say, in ancient times FIDO plus, on the contrary, was a punishment winked )
  46. Landwarrior 15 October 2015 15: 04 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I also wanted to have the sergeant’s shoulder straps fixed to me, but alas ...
    And about the fact that there are only adults, I don’t know. The ancient forum "rule of 10 schoolchildren" also works here laughing
  47. Vadimsh 15 October 2015 15: 10 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    there is a rational grain, I also agree when they start discussing how the spirits will smash the air base, it seems that the command does not know the tactics and fundamentals of military operations, does not have combat experience and does not take into account the experience of military operations in the DRA and the Czech Republic.
  48. Vadim12 15 October 2015 15: 43 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It seems to me that smart people are sitting in our General Staff. I think all possible options have been calculated, provided for in terms of safety and technology and personnel.
  49. Radikal 15 October 2015 17: 00 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Lukich
    Quote: Mahmut
    And I am 100% sure that our common enemies will certainly take advantage of these “tips” in Syria.

    but I’m not sure that the terrorists from Syria are tracking the comments on the Military Review website. with all due respect to the site

    Yes, most likely just like that, just a few other people do it .... Trained.
  50. sanyavolhv 15 October 2015 17: 55 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    health
    I personally come here for the sake of humor. I understand something in psychology .... I do not need titles.
    I want to note this site is not always read by ordinary people. officials meet, they need to make a decision, there are opinions for and against. need to weigh. who will weigh? analysts pay big money? what for ? here suck up and down. if you drain the water ... sometimes there may be nothing left in the dry residue. will we help Russia with our brains?
    further more. Of course, did you notice how America refers to Internet resources? then they are monitoring. So, like the Russian nomenclature, they work out and earn their bread. So the Western nomenclature collects their bread here. will we help the west?
    and further. eeeee nuuuu about the creation of public opinion, I will not talk. I will say that any site can be used to create public opinion. To do this, you can create some articles with which to check the "calibration" of their thoughts, their arguments ....
    and so all is well beautiful marquise, all is well.