I do not want to be a general!
I registered on the “Military Review” website this summer. At first I just read it. Then fascinated, interesting articles, statements and comments. It is felt that on the site adult men with experience in life and in military affairs participate in discussions. Of course, not everyone is currently military, but military service is for sure.
At first, everything was perceived as a simple game, to gain pluses, to get another “title”. Subsequently began to pay more attention to the content of the comments on the articles. I noticed that there are wise and business proposals, and there are just emissions with an eye to getting a plus sign.
Marshals added, and the quality of comments falls.
As far as I understand, let this be a game, but you need to play in this case honestly! And if you received a high “rank”, then your comments, and maybe suggestions, should correspond to your status on the topwar website? And the further you “grow”, the more responsibly you have to approach the content of your statements and comments. It should not be emissions like “death to the fascists,” as I wrote in my article, I don’t remember which of the users, or the indignation that they grabbed a plus sign, and even more so the mat or a hint of it.
Today I have the status of a “colonel”, and, as it were, with experience, but I feel I don’t want to be a general. And even more so marshal. I am not a military man, not an analyst, and the “title” of a colonel suits me perfectly, that is, I can afford to put in a cheerful smiley face and laugh heartily. Without risking to be condemned by some "marshals" who are not marshals at all, but lovers of rattling about something, and some of them have a place on a talk show with Andrey Malakhov and others. Let them discuss the color of the next star's panties!
And what about one discussion of “marshals” and “generals” topics: “Like in the old days: they would be hit by“ Stingers? ”I was just outraged by how site users were discussing ways to destroy our VKS base in Syria throughout the day. And the bulk of truly “literate ways” was expressed precisely by “carriers of high command marks.” And on 100% sure, our common enemies will certainly use these “tips” in Syria.
Well and further, I write especially literate comments with details, I don’t have time for references to articles and facts, but I try to be aware of the main political and military events.
For the reasons stated above, I would prefer to remain in the “officer corps”, and since there is no other way to remain in the so-called “golden middle” (and sometimes you want to express your point of view), you, the users of the site, if not against it, put a minus for article, I will be very grateful to you, otherwise there is not much left to the “general”.
(From VO editorial. Article rating does not affect the author’s rating.)
At first, everything was perceived as a simple game, to gain pluses, to get another “title”. Subsequently began to pay more attention to the content of the comments on the articles. I noticed that there are wise and business proposals, and there are just emissions with an eye to getting a plus sign.
Marshals added, and the quality of comments falls.
As far as I understand, let this be a game, but you need to play in this case honestly! And if you received a high “rank”, then your comments, and maybe suggestions, should correspond to your status on the topwar website? And the further you “grow”, the more responsibly you have to approach the content of your statements and comments. It should not be emissions like “death to the fascists,” as I wrote in my article, I don’t remember which of the users, or the indignation that they grabbed a plus sign, and even more so the mat or a hint of it.
Today I have the status of a “colonel”, and, as it were, with experience, but I feel I don’t want to be a general. And even more so marshal. I am not a military man, not an analyst, and the “title” of a colonel suits me perfectly, that is, I can afford to put in a cheerful smiley face and laugh heartily. Without risking to be condemned by some "marshals" who are not marshals at all, but lovers of rattling about something, and some of them have a place on a talk show with Andrey Malakhov and others. Let them discuss the color of the next star's panties!
And what about one discussion of “marshals” and “generals” topics: “Like in the old days: they would be hit by“ Stingers? ”I was just outraged by how site users were discussing ways to destroy our VKS base in Syria throughout the day. And the bulk of truly “literate ways” was expressed precisely by “carriers of high command marks.” And on 100% sure, our common enemies will certainly use these “tips” in Syria.
Well and further, I write especially literate comments with details, I don’t have time for references to articles and facts, but I try to be aware of the main political and military events.
For the reasons stated above, I would prefer to remain in the “officer corps”, and since there is no other way to remain in the so-called “golden middle” (and sometimes you want to express your point of view), you, the users of the site, if not against it, put a minus for article, I will be very grateful to you, otherwise there is not much left to the “general”.
(From VO editorial. Article rating does not affect the author’s rating.)
Information