Designing Russian tomorrow

What to oppose the multidimensional strategy of globokrats to repel an attack in all directions


In the US National Military Strategy (NAF), where the installations are laid for which the US military will fight, it all comes down to the implementation of a program to build an international order. But the American leadership, which promotes these plans, is not free, but only fulfills the will of those who pay. Given the subordination of the leadership of the United States to globokratyam, the goal laid down in the NAF is in fact pursuing the establishment of a new world order through a planetary war.

Giving an assessment of the political situation in the United States, former President Jimmy Carter, in an interview with OWN (The Oprah Winfrey Network), broadcast at the end of September 2015, said: “America has become an oligarchy instead of democracy. Now no one can be nominated as an election candidate from both Democrats and Republicans if he is unable to collect 200 – 300 million dollars or more. The current presidential campaign has become unprecedented in the amounts poured into candidates. Money comes from the richest donors. This is roughly 400 families. The personal investment of some of them reaches 10 million dollars and more. ”

The New-York Times at the end of August led a list of donors who made millions of investments in the presidential race.

Brave New World


The well-known American journalist R. Perry, the author of the trilogy about the Bush family, writes about neocons (neocons): “American neocons, who have enormous power within the US government and the media, are threatening the planet. Their strategies of regime change in the target countries begin with“ soft forces ”- from propaganda against the government to the financing of internal opposition groups. This is followed by economic sanctions and political destabilization campaigns. And then there is a transition to open military intervention using the full power of the American armed forces. Obama staffed his administration with people desired for neocons, such as R. Gates in the Department of Defense and General D. Petraeus as commander on the battlefield. Interventionist strategies have allowed groups associated with the US government to extract profits from chaos and put together huge fortunes. ”

The program of the new order is subject to four projects, which are expressed in the NAF in the appropriate formulations.

First of all, this is a political plan for building a global empire, where all peoples, through the use of military force, must submit to a single center. In NAF, this is called forming an all-inclusive network of allies and partners who protect and share the interests of the United States. In essence, in the depths of the United States, the core of the universal dictatorship already exists. This is recognized by many American experts and publicists. Someone calls this formation a deep state, someone - a secret, for which the US serves for the time being as a cover, a shell. At a certain point, when it is necessary to come to the surface, the outer shell will be dropped, like reptile skin, and destroyed along with American statehood. And the US Army will do it, national in its name and global in essence. This universal orientation of the US Armed Forces is enshrined in the NAF.

Designing Russian tomorrowOther components of building a new world order are the program of forming an appropriate economic foundation and a religious project. The latter is intended to translate all humanity with the help of military violence into the universal religion of worship of a single ruler. All this is being done under the cover of the military-strategic task of promoting universal values ​​through abandoning traditional values ​​and the faith that forms them.

Of course, the plans provided for the use of military force. The NAF says that the US military should be applied inclusively and be able to conduct large-scale integrated operations, relying on a widespread stabilizing presence. Thus, the military project and the formation of a comprehensive army are the fourth component of the program.

Since Russia in this war is the main target for extermination, it is necessary to report that according to the American strategic guidelines, political, religious, economic aggression is being carried out against our country, involving the use of armed forces.

What can we oppose to this multidimensional strategy to repel an attack in all directions of impact?

We are still a monarchy


The defense strategy is doomed to become as multidimensional. A global empire has risen against our country, the core of which already exists as a network of various entities and structures of total governance. One power must confront another, comparable to it. By the way, in the West everywhere they write and say that the threat is not the Russian Federation, but Russia. We now have these two concepts are synonymous. But Russia is a historically completely different entity, which is associated with a powerful state, victorious in almost all wars in the past.

If the notion “Russian Empire” is included in the picture of modern war and strategy, then everything that is written in the American NAF is built into the system of reverse symmetry and opposition to what was in our country.

They say that the empire does not die, but only passes the baton. Incredibly, but nevertheless Russia is alive, moreover - it exists legally. And this is not idle speculation, but clear legal grounds that are in full compliance with international norms. Crimean Prosecutor Natalya Poklonskaya at the opening in Livadia of the monument to Nicholas II said: "That paper, a copy of the paper, which in textbooks stories presented as alleged renunciation of power, it has no legal meaning. This is a copy of a piece of paper, signed with a pencil, without complying with all the legal and procedural procedures and forms, so this paper does not carry any legal force. ”

“Russian legislation did not provide for the emperor’s abdication of power,” writes Alexander Bokhanov, a doctor of historical sciences, “so from a legal point of view, from the standpoint of the basic laws of the Russian empire, this abdication was illegal ... There is a certain text signed by the Sovereign and it says:“ Chief of Staff ... "The word" manifesto "does not exist there, since in order for the manifesto to appear, this document must be cashed by the senate. The Senate was no longer ... 1 September 1917, Kerensky and the company took and proclaimed Russia a republic, although they had no right to do so. Nikolai Alexandrovich remained the anointed King - this is not to be canceled by any acts. And this anointing is nowhere to be abolished. And he stayed, and the Tsar was murdered in Yekaterinburg, who, albeit with the added authority of his power. And legally, the monarchy in Russia has not been canceled, because there was no national forum of some kind that, so to speak, had the right to make a decision on behalf of the country. Hope was on the Constituent Assembly, but he was dispersed by the Bolsheviks. And therefore, the issue from a formal point of view is solved simply - Russia de jure remains a monarchy, which to this day has not been abolished by legal means. ”

The Russian state can be considered legally abolished only in the case of succession and succession on the part of the new government. But that did not happen. Neither the RSFSR nor the USSR did not recognize such a succession. The preambles of the Soviet constitutions relied on the rule that Soviet statehood began in the 1917 year since the October Revolution.

International law does not recognize automatic succession. De jure, we remain the Russian Empire.

Succession is associated with the problem of citizenship. “Citizenship does not condition the succession,” says law expert Alexander Lyubich. - The logic is only the opposite: succession determines citizenship. It is impossible to draw a conclusion on the succession of the latter with respect to the first, on the basis of the citizens obtaining the liquidated state of the citizenship of the state that started governing the country.

But the new states did not have not only succession, but also legal continuation. In 1917 – 1918, this transition did not occur.

And the empire is alive


Even after 1918, our country was ruled by different regimes with no continuation between them. Hence, from the legal point of view, in the absence of succession and legal continuation, the Russian Empire remains subject to international law. In favor of this is another circumstance. It concerns the question of the legal capacity of the state. According to international law there is a presumption of eternal state legal capacity. This means that the loss of the ability to exercise control over the territory means the loss by the state of only capacity, but does not entail loss of legal capacity.

An analysis of international law leads to the following legal conclusion: The Russian Empire remains a state that has lost its legal capacity. However, its legal capacity was not terminated by the succession to another state, since the RSFSR, referred to as 1991, the Russian Federation, did not assign it.

We emphasize: succession determines citizenship. But if there is no succession, then our people, in accordance with legal canons, objectively continue to be citizens of the Russian Empire, acting as carriers, successors and defenders of its historical program.

If we look at the history of Russia, then our tradition, that is, the spiritual canons transmitted from generation to generation, the political canon, the political and economic forms, corresponds to the historical program, which also includes four projects: political, religious, economic and military.

Third Rome, New Jerusalem


The political project “Russia - the Third Rome” is aimed at building an Orthodox monarchic statehood, continuing the traditions of the Byzantine Empire (Rome the Second) and accepting the baton from it.

Saint Seraphim of Sarov prophesied about the rebirth of the all-powerful All-Slavic kingdom. As it follows from this prophecy, the borders of the revived Russia will be determined by the spiritual community and the voluntariness of the peoples included in it.

The political program "Russia - Third Rome" is inseparable from the religious - "Russia - New Jerusalem". The country is regarded as the keeper of universal Orthodoxy. But at the same time, she respects traditional Islam and, in cooperation with it, contributes to the unity and construction of the state.

Historian Peter Multatuli cites a number of facts confirming this: “The most bloody and long-lasting clash of Russians with Muslims in the Caucasian War was caused not by Russia's aggressive aspirations, but by the intervention of the enemies of Russia — Britain and Turkey. As a result, many leaders of the Caucasians, including Imam Shamil, understood this. Accepted and cared for by Alexander II, Shamil wrote to the sovereign: “My sacred duty is to convince the children of their duties to Russia and its legitimate kings. I will them to be loyal subjects of the Tsar of Russia, to faithfully serve the new Fatherland. ”

General Peter Krasnov, in his book devoted to the feat of the Russian soldier, noted: “Emperor Wilhelm gathered all the Muslim prisoners in a separate camp and, flirting with them, built them a beautiful stone mosque. I do not remember exactly who was invited to this camp, who wanted to demonstrate the dislike of Muslims to the Russian "yoke" and their contentment in German captivity, but the matter ended badly for the Germans. At the end of the inspection of an exemplary camp and a mosque, several thousand Russian Muslim soldiers were gathered on the parade ground. “And now you sing your prayer to us,” said the inspecting person. The mullahs stepped forward. Whispering with the soldiers. Soldiers' masses started up, leveled, and the thousand-voiced choir under the German sky, together with the walls of the newly built mosque, struck together: "God Save the Tsar!"

In the 1916 year, when the liberal opposition press intensified attacks on the government, Mufti Muhammat-Safa Bayazitov wrote in a telegram to Chairman of the Council of Ministers Boris Stürmer: “The faithful sons of the Emperor, the Russian people, steadfastly endure the test of God sent to our Homeland and we are confident that the time will come when our enemies will be smashed against the steel army of the Russian army and the glory and greatness of our dear Motherland - Russia will shine to the joy of our Great Sovereign and his multibreeding nations, He also includes Russian Muslims, who were and will be the devoted sons of their Fatherland and the stronghold of the Russian Throne. ”

The famous monk foreteller Abel (1757 – 1841) prophesied about the implementation of the religious project “Russia - New Jerusalem”: “Great then Russia will be, throwing off the yoke of the godless, will return to the origins of its ancient life, by the times Equal to the Apostles, it will learn the mind-mind in bloody conversation. The smoke of incense and prayers will fill and flourish like Aki kreen of heaven. Great fate destined to her. This is why she will suffer, in order to be purified and to kindle the light in the revelation of tongues. ”

Power, complexity, wealth, happiness


The economic project (another component of the historical program of our people, correlated with the Russian Empire) focused on the public interest and the development of the national economy under a controlled banking system. The well-known economist Edmond Trey emphasized: “If the big European nations are going to have events between 1912 and 1950 for years the same way they developed between 1900 and 1912, by the middle of this century Russia will be above all in Europe both in terms of politics and in the field of financial and economic. "

Back in 1815, at the congress in Vienna, Natan Rothschild suggested to Alexander I to create a central bank (similar to the United States Federal Reserve System), but the king rejected this proposal. The State Bank of Russia was fully subordinate to the state and served as an instrument of government policy. He provided industry and trade in loans with very low interest rates. Gold reserves remained the largest in the world.

In 1914, more than 80 percent of arable land in European Russia was in the hands of the peasants. By 1913, the country has become the largest agricultural producer.

In terms of industrial production growth, our country has overtaken the UK and the USA. Russian industry satisfied 80 percent of the country's domestic needs, that is, it had almost complete economic independence. The state bank gave loans at almost zero interest. It is not surprising that for a long time in the country remained the lowest taxes in the world, almost no inflation was observed.

Labor legislation was so advanced and so humane that US President William Taft said: "The Emperor of Russia adopted such legislation for workers that is closer to perfection than the laws of any democratic country."

Being in the 1919 revolution of Odessa, seized by fire, Ivan Bunin writes: “Our children, grandchildren will not be able to imagine the Russia in which we once (that is, yesterday) lived, which we did not appreciate, did not understand, this power, complexity, wealth, happiness. "

The threat in the modern militaristic context of the United States is understood as the Russian state that currently exists in the depths of our present statehood, which is an example of an independent, prosperous and just power system. It provides a sovereign, self-contained existence, not built into an all-encompassing order, and provides an example to other nations.

In this sacred sense of our statehood lies the main threat to the enemy. And without knowing it, we legally remain citizens of this empire, carriers and continuers of the work of our ancestors, who for centuries have implemented their historical power program.

Where to get the king?


To counter the onslaught of the global democracy, we urgently need a military project. Two world cores, between which a compromise is impossible, enter into a decisive clash.

And if we do not turn to our historical program, we will be doomed to slavishly implement the aggressor’s suicidal plans for us. But how to restore power and where to get the king in our time? Recall why the Russian Empire fell. There were both external and internal causes. The main of them was spiritual. The people fell away from faith. St. John of Kronstadt addressed the people: "You have forgotten God and left Him, and He left you with His fatherly providence and put you in the hands of unbridled, wild arbitrariness." If the power fell through falling away from faith, it means that it will be restored through the coming of the people to faith. Then God will send the king.

Intermediate stage is possible. He was necessary and Ivan Ilyin wrote about this in 1950: “Or inside Russia there will arise a Russian national dictatorship that will take the reins of government into its strong hands ... and lead Russia to unity, preventing all and all separatist movements in the country; or such a dictatorship will not work out, and unimaginable chaos will begin in the country ... Then Russia will be gripped by anarchy and will present itself as the head of its national, military, political and religious enemies ... It goes without saying that all our “good neighbors” will want to take advantage of this state of anarchy; All sorts of military interventions will begin under the pretext of “self-defense”, “reconciliation”, “establishment of order”, etc. And then “good neighbors” will again use all types of intervention. ”

Ivan Bunin writes about what the country is waiting for: “Republic, monarchy? Most likely, at first there will be some kind of military dictatorship - the day and time of which, of course, cannot be guessed, then something like “council of ten” (from iron dealers, former “specialists”) ... Subsequently, the monarchy is not excluded ... . Saying that there is no return to the past, only people who are either cunning, or stupid, or not knowing the history of Russia can.

Entering the Russian empire does not mean returning to the former borders. This is a return to another, traditional device for us, which will allow us to break out of bondage and control from the global democracy.

As I.Ilyin wrote: “The world behind the scenes buries a united national Russia. It is stupid. Short sighted. Hastily in hatred and hopelessly for ages. Russia is not human dust and not chaos. She is first and foremost a great nation, not wasted its forces and not desperate in his vocation. These people are starving for a free order, for peaceful labor, for property and for national culture. Do not bury him prematurely! The historic hour will come, it will rise from an imaginary coffin and demand its rights back! ”
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

54 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. venaya 14 October 2015 05: 52 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    America has become an oligarchy instead of democracy. ... Russian legislation did not provide for the possibility of the emperor's abdication from power ...

    Opportunities for maneuver in our country are greater than anywhere else. I think there are no less prospects. Not everything is lost, everything is just beginning.
    1. kodxnumx 14 October 2015 09: 43 New
      • -5
      • 0
      -5
      Russia needs a monarch! You need to return the historical name of the Russian Empire.
      1. alicante11 14 October 2015 12: 28 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Russia needs a monarch! You need to return the historical name of the Russian Empire.


        This is how some people like the “master of the Russian land” standing on them. Sorry, but the "slave in the galleys" is closer to me, because, in fact, we are colleagues with him, only he sits higher and feed better. And the real owners, fortunately, do not put it on display, but steal themselves slowly.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Interface 15 October 2015 18: 10 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        You need a madhouse. Urgently. This is exactly what Russia needs.
  2. mr.vasilievich 14 October 2015 05: 59 New
    • 11
    • 0
    +11
    In the war with Nazi Germany, all the so-called democratic countries were defeated, and the "dictatorial" Soviet Union survived. I think that in today's realities for Russia, especially with the existing embezzlement, there would be a disastrous model of serene democracy. Some elements of a strong central government are simply necessary.
  3. Andrey Yuryevich 14 October 2015 06: 00 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Crimean prosecutor Natalya Poklonskaya at the opening of the monument to Nicholas II in Livadia said: “That paper, a copy of the paper that was presented in the history books as supposedly the abdication of power, has no legal meaning. This is a copy of a piece of paper, signed in pencil, without following all the legal and procedural necessary procedures, forms, therefore this paper does not carry any legal force. ”
    oh how ... we are the monarchy! when will the king be crowned? what
    1. nadezhiva 14 October 2015 09: 05 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      The question of who no longer sounds laughing There are no options.
    2. evil partisan 14 October 2015 09: 30 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Quote: Andrew Y.
      when will the king be crowned?

      You personally, Colleague, I will bring the date separately yes . In the meantime, “KU” train. And then last time you have this greeting somehow ... vulgarly sad came out. You need to be more humble, more humble. yes
      Pgivet, metallurg drinks
      Now on wink . Article from the category: "cleverness from scratch with the help of quotes from famous people", i.e. - about nothing ...
    3. vladimirw 14 October 2015 12: 29 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Why rush to the extreme that the President has no power to curb the liberals in power and the oligarchs? Will the king appear? FUNNY
  4. afdjhbn67 14 October 2015 06: 17 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    Free flight of thought - nonsense
    1. venaya 14 October 2015 06: 31 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: afdjhbn67
      Free flight of thought - nonsense

      Tatyana Gracheva is not seen in conformism, you can see her other works. The free flight of thought is not a flaw, but gives a variety of options when solving complex problems. Who knows what fate prepares for us.
      1. kayman4 15 October 2015 03: 37 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        The last king, if I remember, brought the country to revolution ....
  5. Coconut 14 October 2015 06: 19 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    in the photo, the eagle has free space UNDER the tail .. wassat
  6. populist 14 October 2015 06: 21 New
    • 10
    • 0
    +10
    Where to get the king?

    Yes, take the king is not a thing!
    They did not translate with us!
    Vladimir the Wise, Joseph the Terrible, Nikita the Miracle Worker, Leonid the Chronicler, a labeled bear, Borka the drunkard, Vladimir Borets. So, no problem.
    1. Eaglealex 14 October 2015 06: 29 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Populist, ahead of, took off the tongue
    2. Uncle lee 14 October 2015 07: 30 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Yes, take the king is not a thing!
      The king is king, and most importantly the will and spirituality of the people!
    3. Xsanchez 14 October 2015 13: 23 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Vovchik the Mad, Joseph was not a king, rather a prime minister, the king was Misha Kalinin, then Molotov, after the Crazy Khrushchev (Nikitos), after the Lenya kisser.
      1. Ladoga 14 October 2015 21: 33 New
        • -2
        • 0
        -2
        ,, the king was Misha Kalinin ,,!

        Well, what a king, in fact! Rather, a humble servant, bring it - bring it, go out, I. Stalin openly chuckled at him. ,, King ,, God forgive me ...
  7. Eaglealex 14 October 2015 06: 28 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And the monarchy didn’t go away after 17, it was just an elected king: first, Vladimir the Great, then Joseph the Terrible, followed by Nikita Zemlepashets, followed by Leonid Chronicler, Yuri 2 Dolgoruky, Konstantin Stary, Mikhail Mecheny, Boris Krasnyy Nos .... It seems nobody I forgot. It looks like socialism, but in reality - a monarchy ... With a human face ...
    1. venaya 14 October 2015 07: 06 New
      • -1
      • 0
      -1
      Quote: EagleAlex
      But the monarchy after 17 did not go anywhere ... Socialism seems to be, but in reality it is a monarchy ... With a human face ...

      A monarchy does not at all mean a political structure such as socialism, capitalism or what the hell. Monarchies existed not only hereditary, but also re-elected, it all depends on the legislation on succession. By the way, in the work "On the State" Plato called democracy, as a form of government, the worst kind of state. control look.
  8. strelets 14 October 2015 06: 31 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Even if we declare ourselves the successors of the Russian Empire, I doubt that they will return the Russian gold settled in the west. Not for that he was appropriated.
    1. Eaglealex 14 October 2015 06: 33 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Let them choke ...
  9. ImPerts 14 October 2015 06: 34 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Crimean prosecutor Natalya Poklonskaya at the opening of the monument to Nicholas II in Livadia said: “That paper, a copy of the paper that was presented in the history books as ostensibly renunciation of power, has no legal meaning. This is a copy of a piece of paper, signed in pencil, without following all legal and procedural necessary proceduresforms therefore this paper does not carry any legal force».

    An interesting maxim. But what about the resolutions of Stalin, with which the de-Stalinists shook and shake ?!
    Z. S. I will only be for the recognition of the act invalid, it will mean that Stalin was lied to.
  10. nik4422 14 October 2015 06: 42 New
    • -8
    • 0
    -8
    Quote: Andrew Y.
    oh how ... we are the monarchy! when will the king be crowned?

    The faster the better.
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. populist 14 October 2015 06: 52 New
    • -6
    • 0
    -6
    [quote = populist] [quote] [quote]
    Vladimir Borets. So, no problem. [/ Quote]
    Vladimir Borets - not because the black belt.
    But because it fights against terrorists, p.i.nd.so.sami, white-bellied, Vasiliev, etc.
    1. VEKT 14 October 2015 09: 13 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      [quote] [quote = populist] [quote] [quote]
      Vladimir Borets. So, no problem. [/ Quote]
      Vladimir Borets - not because the black belt.
      But because it fights against terrorists, p.i.nd.d.sami, belolentochnikami, Vasiliev, etc. [/ quote]
      And then he did not overcome Vasiliev.
    2. Victor Demchenko 14 October 2015 10: 50 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      and really helps everyone, especially small business!
      1. bastard 14 October 2015 13: 03 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: Victor Demchenko
        and really helps everyone, especially small business!

        It really helps, it helps! Such touching concern for people! I already had tears of tenderness in my eyes, I was so moved by the blessings of Radiant, right now I’ll be happy, excuse me, the memories surged.
        All! I can’t do it anymore! I’ll go take 400 drops of valerian with alcohol.
        And ishsho Sun-like "helps" education, village, health care. . .
        Purely subjective opinion, maybe someone else.
  13. sa-ag 14 October 2015 07: 40 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Who is in a hurry to the serfs, and then all sorts of countesses with marquises from EP, LDPR and other SRs will get into the queue for souls
  14. Boris55 14 October 2015 07: 43 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Quote: Tatyana Gracheva
    This is a return to another device that is traditional for us, which will allow us to break out of bondage and control by globocracy.

    Globalization is an objective process. Division of labor is the most efficient mode of production. Mankind has been striving for this from its very inception (male earner, female guardian of the outbreak, etc.). There is no need to "break out of bondage and control by the global democracy." No need to get out of the natural process of human development. This process must be led.

    At the last UN session, in the person of Putin and Obama, two concepts of human development were revealed to the world
    The peoples of the earth have two ways of living:
    - European globalization, where the rule of the strong and
    - Globalization in Russian, that is, in fairness (not to be confused with egalitarianism).
    I choose globalization in Russian.
    1. Monge 14 October 2015 11: 05 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      globalization according to European dominated by the right to strong and
      - Globalization in Russian, that is, in fairness (not to be confused with egalitarianism).
      It depends on which side to look, sort of like a "spy" and a "scout"
      1. Boris55 14 October 2015 11: 15 New
        • -1
        • 1
        -2
        Quote: Monge
        It depends on which side to look, sort of like a "spy" and a "scout"

        Obama - "who is not under us is against us." This is a concept for self-destruction.
        Putin - all countries and peoples are equal. This concept is for creation.
        Do you feel the difference?
    2. Uncle Joe 14 October 2015 18: 01 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Boris55
      At the last UN session, in the person of Putin and Obama, two concepts of human development were revealed to the world
      The peoples of the earth have two ways of living:
      - globalization in European
      Carried out under capitalism in the interests of, above all, the Western bourgeoisie.
      - globalization in Russian
      Which should be carried out under capitalism in the interests of the Western and Russian bourgeoisie.

      i.e in fairness (not to be confused with leveling)
      wassat

      I choose globalization in Russian.
      Trotsky would be proud of you.
      1. Boris55 14 October 2015 19: 57 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        Quote: Uncle Joe
        Carried out under capitalism in the interests of, above all, the Western bourgeoisie.

        Globalization goes on regardless of the social system, starting from the primitive, when there was no trace of the bourgeois and continues to this day.
        The bourgeois rule in the West through their proteges - presidents.
        In our last election, the president won with national front.
        Can you name how many bourgeois are included in the popular front?
        Regarding the emoticon - our participation in Syria - fair or not? What about the Americans?
        1. Uncle Joe 15 October 2015 00: 44 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Boris55
          In our last election, the president won with national front.
          And probably ran for ONF? laughing

          Can you name how many bourgeois are included in the popular front?
          Bourgeois and their henchmen in ONF 100%.

          The central headquarters of the ONF is especially pleased:

          Govorukhin Stanislav Sergeevich - EdRo
          Timofeeva Olga Viktorovna - EdRo
          Aitkulova Elvira Rinatovna - EdRo
          Batalina Olga Yurievna - EdRo
          Bogomaz Alexander Vasilievich - EdRo
          Bocharov Andrey Ivanovich - EdRo
          Vasiliev Alexander Nikolaevich - EdRo

          Etc. lol

          Regarding the emoticon - our participation in Syria - fair or not? What about the Americans?
          2 bandits share what you inherited - this fair, or not? smile

          And personally, you double greetings from the front-line all-conquering just Putin laughing


          MOSCOW, 14.10.2015/20151014/1301970265 - RIA Novosti. Russian President Vladimir Putin awarded Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev the Order of Merit to the Fatherland, I degree, for his great contribution to the socio-economic development of the Russian Federation, a corresponding decree was published on the official Internet portal of legal information on Wednesday. http://ria.ru/society/XNUMX/XNUMX.html

          October 14 2015
          Putin proposed banning quotes from the Bible and the Qur'an as extremism
          The President introduced a bill to the State Duma according to which the sacred books of Christianity, Islam, Judaism and Buddhism cannot be recognized as extremist materials, which is done in development of one of the provisions of the Constitution
          Based on the preamble of the aforementioned Federal Law, it is precisely Christianity, Islam, Judaism and Buddhism that form an integral part of the historical heritage of the peoples of Russia.
          "In connection with the foregoing and in order to ensure equal respect for world traditional religions, the bill proposes to establish that the Bible, the Koran, Tanah and Ganjur, which constitute the spiritual basis of these religions, their contents and quotes from them cannot be recognized as extremist materials," - emphasized in the document.
          http://www.interfax.ru/russia/473437
  15. Steppe 14 October 2015 08: 15 New
    • -4
    • 0
    -4
    I believe that the revival of the monarchy in Russia is not a bad idea. And so that there would be no disputes in the struggle for the throne between the descendants of the Romanovs, I believe that the tsar should be chosen from them through a vote of Russian citizens.
    1. TanakaKenshin 14 October 2015 10: 27 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      The Romanovs loved the right to the throne and washed away. So - well, stump them.
  16. lwxx 14 October 2015 08: 26 New
    • -3
    • 0
    -3
    Volodka to the kingdom ?! wassat
  17. anip 14 October 2015 08: 43 New
    • 11
    • 0
    +11
    Designing Russian tomorrow


    Already designed:
    The Ministry of Finance proposed to double the salaries of officials of the State Duma apparatus
    http://lenta.ru/news/2015/10/13/duma/
    http://www.gazeta.ru/business/news/2015/10/13/n_7764995.shtml

    Salaries of teachers and doctors in 2016 will be reduced by 34 billion rubles.
    http://www.rbc.ru/economics/11/10/2015/5617d5a59a7947268ae2a278

    Rejoice, hoo-Utriots.
    1. VEKT 14 October 2015 09: 20 New
      • 9
      • 0
      +9
      Already designed:
      The Ministry of Finance proposed to double the salaries of officials of the State Duma apparatus
      http://lenta.ru/news/2015/10/13/duma/
      http://www.gazeta.ru/business/news/2015/10/13/n_7764995.shtml

      Salaries of teachers and doctors in 2016 will be reduced by 34 billion rubles.
      http://www.rbc.ru/economics/11/10/2015/5617d5a59a7947268ae2a278

      Rejoice, hoo-Utriots.
      Well, the cherry on the cake
      Russian President Vladimir Putin said that Russia will follow the path of demonopolization of railway transport and electricity. source: http: //ria.ru/economy/20151013/1301036473.html
      it's time to cut the rails.
      1. sa-ag 14 October 2015 09: 29 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        Quote: VEKT
        Already designed:
        The Ministry of Finance proposed to double the salaries of officials of the State Duma apparatus
        http://lenta.ru/news/2015/10/13/duma/
        http://www.gazeta.ru/business/news/2015/10/13/n_7764995.shtml

        Salaries of teachers and doctors in 2016 will be reduced by 34 billion rubles.
        http://www.rbc.ru/economics/11/10/2015/5617d5a59a7947268ae2a278

        Rejoice, hoo-Utriots.
        Well, the cherry on the cake
        Russian President Vladimir Putin said that Russia will follow the path of demonopolization of railway transport and electricity. source: http: //ria.ru/economy/20151013/1301036473.html
        it's time to cut the rails.

        You can add this to the heap - "the Ministry of Finance has made its proposals to save budget funds. According to RBC, citing its own sources, officials offer to abandon the indexation of pensions and other social payments." abolition of indexation of pensions for working pensioners in 2016
        1. Gardamir 14 October 2015 10: 33 New
          • 6
          • 0
          +6
          Here are the words that Vladimir the Great said yesterday at the “Russia is ringing” international gangway
          And finally, after all, I will allow myself to say a good word to the Government of the Russian Federation, the Central Bank. Despite all the difficulties and difficulties faced by the Russian economy, our management team in the field of economics has demonstrated a high level of responsibility, consistency and ability to achieve results. It seems to me that this is also a good prerequisite in order to believe that Russia is a good place to work together and invest here.
          1. anip 14 October 2015 17: 03 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: Gardamir
            Here are the words that Vladimir the Great said yesterday at the “Russia is ringing” international gangway
            And finally, after all, I will allow myself to say a good word to the Government of the Russian Federation, the Central Bank. Despite all the difficulties and difficulties faced by the Russian economy, our management team in the field of economics has demonstrated a high level of responsibility, consistency and ability to achieve results. It seems to me that this is also a good prerequisite in order to believe that Russia is a good place to work together and invest here.


            Moreover, Putin has repeatedly said something like that. But hurray to the Patriots is not familiar with everything, they scream "scatter-get-up-s-kalen", even despite the next robbery of the population in December 2014 and continuing to this day.

            Due to the collapse of the ruble, the welfare of Russian families in dollar terms collapsed by 40% over the year and returned to the 2005 level, according to Credit Suisse's annual Global Wealth Report.
            http://www.exocur.ru/blagosostoyanie-rossiyan-za-god-snizilos-na-40-i-vernulos-n

            a-uroven-2005-year /
  18. akudr48 14 October 2015 08: 44 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    The author correctly pointed out that the world is ruled by globocracy, financial oligarchic clans of an international nature.

    These more rulers of the world (on 2–3 roles, they are satisfied) should include our more than hundreds of billionaires who stole and exported about 1500 billion from Russia, took their children and mistresses away (the son of Yakunin, who is a British citizenship) and they actually moved there, continuing to steal in Russia and export abroad, in front of all our bodies, deputies and the rower in the galleys, our clear sun ...

    Until this thieves' mushroom picker is eradicated, and leaks and holes are not boarded on board the ship Russia, all dreams of a new Russia (Third Rome, new Jerusalem) are not only fruitless dreams, but also just fairy tales for children ml. age.
    1. Uncle Joe 14 October 2015 18: 14 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: akudr48
      These more rulers of the world (on 2–3 roles, they are satisfied) should include our more than hundreds of billionaires who stole and exported about 1500 billion from Russia, took their children and mistresses away (the son of Yakunin, who is a British citizenship) and they actually moved there, continuing to steal in Russia and export abroad, in front of all our bodies, deputies and the rower in the galleys, our clear sun ...
      Those billionaires who were not at all in 2000, already had 2001 in 8, and 2013 in 131.
  19. Volzhanin 14 October 2015 09: 15 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    It remains the case for small:
    1. Conduct a general reading of the scum of society, which at present has captured almost all the power structures. Especially in the State Duma there is an excess of parasites.
    2. Amend the Constitution and individual laws.
    3. Unlink the economy from the dollar.
    4. Focus on building a social society.

    Then all these globalists, multinational corporations, mattresses, Anglo-Saxons and Zhidomassons will be just spitting under our feet!
  20. Kyrgyz 14 October 2015 09: 32 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    And who will be the king? and how to justify what is worthy? - nonsense
  21. vladimirvn 14 October 2015 09: 37 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    The revolutionary situation is when the tops cannot steal in a new way, and the lower classes do not want to thump in the old.
  22. Was mammoth 14 October 2015 10: 01 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Something of late has often come up with the theme of monarchy. With dubious references, even to "international law". What is it for? No, no, really. "Died, so died." Russia is a republic, not a monarchy.
    1. sa-ag 14 October 2015 10: 27 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Was Mammoth
      What is it for? No, no, really. "Died, so died." Russia is a republic, not a monarchy.

      That's right, my grandfather, for example, fought with this tsarism and fought with all sorts of whites, and I think some here also have such ancestors, what benefits this mythical newly-born monarchism will bring, but no, there will be all the same groups, with the same interests, only in a new frame, only the zeal of bureaucracy is noticeable to please the very top, sometimes reaching the point of absurdity
    2. VEKT 14 October 2015 10: 47 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Do you think it’s just that the influence of the church is increased? Monarchy is possible only justified by the church, the source of power of the monarch is not a people but a god.
  23. 19max70 14 October 2015 10: 48 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    “And if we don’t turn to our historical program, we’ll be doomed to slavishly realize the aggressor’s suicidal plans for us.” - To turn to the historical program, you need to know the history. What story do we know? How deep do we know her?
    Many are ready to bring cement, stone, sand. Who is the architect?
  24. Aleksandr1959 14 October 2015 11: 29 New
    • -3
    • 0
    -3
    As for the monarchy in Russia, Roman Valerievich Zlotnikov writes very well.
    More recently, at the word "monarchy" I contemptuously pursed my lips. People in the modern world who were serious about the monarchy seemed to me mummers, kind of overgrown overgrown.

    But one day I came across a guide with a UN rating on quality and life expectancy. I was surprised to find that seven of the top ten countries are monarchies. I tried to explain this by accident. Then I thought that all these countries are primarily democracies. The monarchy there is just a tradition that has no practical significance. Can Canada or Australia be considered monarchical states? After all, where are they, and where is the British queen ?! But the question hit me, and I began to dig. And he came to the conclusions that struck me.

    Firstly, the monarchy is not one of the forms of government, but rather the most successful form of organization of the nation. By a nation, I do not mean a certain limited ethnic group, but the entire set of peoples, which managed to create a strong and stable state. Regardless of size.

    For example, the Flemish-Walloon nation at one time managed to create the Kingdom of Belgium, the Austro-Hungarian-Czech-Slovak - the mighty Austria-Hungary, and the Serbo-Croatian - Yugoslavia.

    An interesting pattern: in the case of a multinational state, the integrity of the country is preserved only with the preservation of the monarchy. And where they lost the monarchy, only one zilch remained from the state.


    ..monarchy is not an application to stability and prosperity, but an additional resource that makes it easier to bear the disease, recover more quickly from political and economic hardships.


    http://samoderjavie.ru/node/895
    1. sa-ag 14 October 2015 11: 42 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      The USSR was itself a completely strong and stable state without any monarchy, and the stability of the monarchy is relative, recall Cromwell, in Serbia Karageorgievichs changed, “six bullets like in Sarajevo” (C), Nicholas II, the monarchy gives nothing new to the people, this is the other side of the oligarchocracy , with other ceremonies, and all the same - the well-being of persons close to the body and, according to the residual principle, the rest of the people
      1. Aleksandr1959 14 October 2015 12: 20 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        The USSR was a stable state until the death of I.V. Stalin. Which is not in vain, now called the "Red Monarch." He did not inherit any firms, financial contributions, he left the Power as an inheritance. After the Khrushchev military coup, the country slowly. but surely rolled downhill. And in the 70s there was a group of high-ranking party officials who began to prepare the surrender of the USSR for their own selfish purposes. To do this, they used Gorbachev, Yeltsin and others like them. Apparently, one of the representatives of this group was Member of the Politburo of the CPSU A.N. Yakovlev.
        It must be understood that the nomenclature as a social community gradually realized its interest, which by the 80s consisted in the destruction of Soviet society. That was precisely the problem that the USSR could no longer develop, having a social structure with the dominance of nomenclature — this way of organizing management no longer worked — from there the emergence and aggravation of negative trends in the economy and society. Therefore, the choice arose, either the USSR or the nomenclature, and the latter chose their beloved. In general, she retained herself by results, seizing property and laying it at the basis of her new dominance in post-Soviet countries.
        1. Uncle Joe 14 October 2015 18: 19 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Aleksandr1959
          The USSR was a stable state until the death of I.V. Stalin. Which is not in vain, now called the "Red Monarch"
          According to the system of our Constitution, the USSR should not have a sole president, elected by the entire population, on a par with the Supreme Council, and able to oppose the Supreme Council. The collegiate president in the USSR is the Presidium of the Supreme Council, including the chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Council, elected not by the entire population, but by the Supreme Council and accountable to the Supreme Council. The experience of history shows that such a construction of the supreme organs is the most democratic, guaranteeing the country from undesirable accidents.
          I. Stalin T.14 s.144
          1. Aleksandr1959 14 October 2015 18: 30 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            And who really made the decisions? Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR M.I. Kalinin? It is unlikely.
            1. Uncle Joe 15 October 2015 00: 55 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: Aleksandr1959
              And who really made the decisions? Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR M.I. Kalinin?
              Read the Constitution of the 36th year, and such questions will disappear by themselves.

              PS For one meaning of the phrase "democratic centralism" you can take a look.
  25. Tambov Wolf 14 October 2015 12: 01 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    "We, there is a third Rome, and there will be no other." It is said firmly and forever. Everything else is from Satan.
  26. Old warrior 14 October 2015 14: 27 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The only opportunity for Russia to exist is the Empire.
  27. The comment was deleted.
  28. vostok1982 14 October 2015 17: 28 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    There is no return to the old, and a fool is one who tries to enter the same river twice. It is necessary to invent new meanings, to design something, hitherto unprecedented. Something attractive, simple, bright, purely Russian and at the same time - common, from which neither the Tartar, nor the Kazakh, nor the Ukrainian will turn their backs. Russia is already perceived as the leader of the Resistance, it is necessary to move in this direction, at the same time being filled not only with the negation of the decadent West, but also with the creation of our concepts, our goals.
  29. solidus 14 October 2015 17: 36 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    Unfortunately, at the moment we have no industry other than the military. Import substitution is not possible, because not own equipment. Even our products are manufactured using imported equipment. Sadly, without it we won’t even bake bread. What can we say about machines, machining centers, mining, engineering. It is worth noting that military production is also impossible without imported machines. In order to revive an empire, you need to have a platform, at the moment it does not exist. What to dissemble, we don’t have our own Steve Jobs, we have a lot of tanks and oil, since we are still in the game.
    1. Ladoga 14 October 2015 23: 11 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      ,, What to dissemble, we don’t have our own Steve Jobs, there are many tanks and oil, since we are still in the game. ,,

      We do not have Steve Jobs, but there is Prokhorov, a billionaire who set out to somehow make a typewriter of a very ridiculous appearance, but somehow quickly blown away. What can I say, if in the 90s DuPont alone was equal in volume of its products to the entire chemical industry in Russia.
      Although, one plus is still there - the water in the Volga (at that time) was cleaner.
  30. Azovian 15 October 2015 10: 37 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Someone long ago and not "ordinary" said that Russia without Ukraine will cease to be an Empire. Probably it is. Ambitions remained, empires did not. There is less desire to enter the site. Complete glorification of Russia. And there are not many reasons for delight. You can joke as much as you like. But Russia is losing dill. For rent Donbass. But UPA knows his business. Almost every day in the schools of the occupied territories of Donbass, “glorious warriors” give lectures in uniform to schoolchildren. In the Zaporizhzhya region Rus. lang lit. not taught for two years. Not a gram of Pushkin, Lermontov, Tolstoy, not to mention Mayakovsky ... And now the children will be brought up on the traditions of the UPA, Maidan, Bandera. These are the words of Poroshenko. Rejoice, rossine, dill, like, agreed to buy your gas! Is this the most important thing?