New missiles for the PAK FA

Photos of the latest air-to-surface missiles, designed to arm Russian aircraft, including the PAK FA, have appeared on the Internet. Among them, the X-59MK2 rocket and X-58USHKE square section. Reports about it Rossiyskaya Gazeta.

X-59MK2 is designed to engage stationary targets with known coordinates. According to the newspaper, “the ammunition guidance system is combined: inertial and satellite GPS / GLONASS, the optical-electronic homing head is turned on in the final part of the trajectory.” It is reported that the flight of the rocket occurs at a height from 50-ti to 300 m, the types of combat units - cassette and penetrating.

The second missile, the X-XNUMHUSHKE, is anti-radar. “The ammunition is equipped with a broadband passive homing head: the rocket hears any activity on the air, but no one hears it. The “killer” of the radar flies three times faster than sound over a distance of 58 kilometers and delivers an 250-kilogram high-explosive warhead to the target, ”the newspaper writes.

Both missiles are currently being tested on T-50. According to the Commander-in-Chief of VKS Bondarev, “PAK FA with weapons shows excellent results. "

Comments

[maxim1987]

beauties!

[Serafim-k]

I agree, especially the X-58USHKE .. It resembles the "behavior" of a shark that smelled blood, it turns out there is no salvation for ERL .. !! Well done, our military industrial complex ..!

[Mera joota]

Quote: Serafim-K

it turns out for ERL there is no salvation .. !! Well done our military-industrial complex ..!

This is the level of the end of the last century. Modern anti-radar missiles are equipped with multi-band seeker for invented means of countering them. Starting from turning off the radar, ending with the use of false emitters and equipment for "displacement" of the EM pulse forcing the PRR to be triggered by the target. The Kh-58USHKE is equipped with a passive seeker and a "modern" INS; The INS allows, when the enemy radar is turned off, to "remember" the location of the radar and to hit there, due to the powerful warhead, a large radius of destruction is provided.
You can compare what they ALREADY have:

[absurdity]

Do you think our missiles are less adapted to countering electronic warfare?

[kotvov]

This is the level of the end of the last century,
I understand that you are advanced. But tell me in the open press, will they publish TTD of new equipment?

[mmk]

It looks like a chatter, but about the price I generally am silent, if any.

[Dezinto]

They probably stand like a cast-iron bridge. But ... definitely needed!

Another SURPRISE! How's the CIA intelligence? Have you already tweeted about new Russian missiles? - Well, everything means a report of 500 pages of reflection is ready.

[NEXUS]

Quote: DEZINTO

They probably stand like a cast-iron bridge. But ... definitely needed!

A new aircraft, for new combat conditions and new methods of warfare, means a new arsenal is also needed for it. I think this is not the latest news about new missiles for our fighters and bombers.

[marlin1203]

Only a native Muscovite could say about the "cast-iron bridge" - This is a purely Moscow chip related to the history of urban development. Yes, unfortunately, all modern high-tech weapons are very expensive. But on the plane of the 5th generation there is no other ammunition and it makes no sense to hang up.

[Lissyara]

Amuse the people. About bridges. A joke.
Our officials went on an exchange of experience abroad. They were well greeted sitting in a bathhouse plump Hennessey. Our shocked by this reception.
- Where did such funds come from?
“See the bridge over there?”
- Yes
- There the car went over the bridge, she brought a dollar to our table. .. on this and thump
A year passes and our officials are already receiving guests on the Volga. Met cool, brandy, cognac, caviar, girls. Foreigners are shocked by this reception.
- Where did the money come from?
“See the bridge over there?”
- Not
- This is thumping. ..

[Lissyara]

Here the other day, the Americans were puzzling. I periodically watch their channels. So their antediluvian Sidewinder AIM-9 appreciated as many as 600 thousand of their raccoons. At the real price in 60 thousand thousand missed.
Although I respect the rocket. Already from 1956 g. Is in service. The same age as the B-52 and our Tu-95.
I wonder who was named after? Rattlesnake or bad man?

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

Quote: LiSSyara

Although I respect the rocket. Already since 1956 it has been in service

To say that Sidewinder has been in service since 1956 is roughly the same as saying that the T-90 is a small modification of the T-34 and has been in service with domestic aircraft since the pre-war era.
Just look a little on the Internet, all the data is in the public domain - you will see for yourself that the Sidewinder of 1956 and Sidewinder 9X in terms of capabilities are related approximately like the T-34 and T-90.

Quote: LiSSyara

I wonder who was named after? Rattlesnake or bad man

Snakes, snakes :)))

[Lissyara]

Let's take our R-73. Also "rocket-soldier". Although it is written that the dashing Georgian guys have been releasing it since 1983, in reality it appeared earlier. Although the name now has a modern one RVV-MD.
I just still wear epaulets)))
But you are cool with tanks. Actually, the T-64 hohlothank with all modifications was the basis. Then the T-72 was born in Tagil, Lower which. And the race rushed to the T-90.
Something reminiscent of the construction of the Lada. There was Fiat, and we turned it into 30, 05 for 07 years.
Armata, this is really NEW.

[Lissyara]

Smart people minus with justification. Not pretending to be woodpeckers. So put this minus in your "priest".
And if it is not true that I wrote, justify your weighty facts.

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

Quote: LiSSyara

Let's take our R-73. Also "rocket-soldier". Although it is written that the dashing Georgian guys have been releasing it since 1983, in reality it appeared earlier. Although the name now has a modern one RVV-MD.

Unfortunately, I did not quite understand you, or maybe I didn’t understand you at all. R-73 is a wonderful thing, at the time of its appearance, it is probably the best short-range missile in the world, and now it's still wow. RVV-MD is its modification, how deep it is - I don’t know, but I don’t think that they screwed up a couple of rivets there :) In my opinion, there is a very serious revision of the base R-73.
In 1983, the R-73 was adopted, right? And that she could have appeared in the troops before - so you, as a military man, I think you know better than me what was there, but how. If not secret - please tell me, I will be very grateful for the information.

Quote: LiSSyara

But you are cool with tanks.

Well, you understand that I have exaggerated. T-90 is not a small modification or T-34 :))) In principle, the same applies to sidewinders

[Lissyara]

Andrey, RVV MD and R old woman, it’s about like T72 of the first release and T90С. A good example. Take the Tu-95 MS, the 55 car of the year. What is left of it except the glider?

[Lissyara]

By the way, on the T-34, still a seventh of Asia and Africa are fighting.

[Nick]

Competent move. The square section allows more complete use of the limited internal volume of the fuselage.

[kil 31]

Quote: Nick

Competent move. The square section allows more complete use of the limited internal volume of the fuselage.

But still, rudders and wings will interfere. So it makes no difference round or square. Unless of course you hide the wings and rudders inside the rocket before launch.

[Nick]

Quote: keel 31

But still, rudders and wings will interfere. So it makes no difference round or square. Unless of course you hide the wings and rudders inside the rocket before launch.

You are on the right track. The wings add up, this can be understood by the example of a close instance. In addition, it is possible to arrange the products in a staggered manner so that the buoying parts do not touch ...

[kil 31]

Nick (1) You're on the right track. The wings fold, this can be understood by the example of a close instance. In addition, it is possible to arrange the products in a checkerboard pattern so that the buoying parts do not touch.

Well, good. Just not in the photo, not in the article about this. Could boast to the end.

[kotvov]

Could brag to the end,
here for this head and daden.

[Throw]

And there is also a triangular section

[WUA 518]

Quote: Nick

The wings fold, this can be understood by example

[NordUral]

Take a closer look. Perfectly fit into the medium profile. This is not a square, but a rectangle, which will allow you to place more suspensions in a row.

[Azitral]

Facets. Although without much fanaticism that interferes with the business, cut products will have a lower location signature. It is said that round bombs are visible INSIDE the "faceted" "stealth" under certain conditions.

[Sukhoi]

X-58 is like normal ...

[Lissyara]

People, do not write nonsense. About squares and circles.
See how rotary drums are arranged on the Tu-160 and Tu-95MS. And what is the best way to hang on the suspension.
There is information on the Internet.

[A1L9E4K9S]

Both missiles are currently being tested on the T-50. According to the commander of the VKS Bondarev, "PAK FA with weapons shows excellent results."

Good luck defending Russia.

[Penetrator]

X-58USHKE square section - anti-radar. The munition is equipped with a broadband passive homing head: the rocket hears any activity on the air, but no one hears it

I always believed that streamlined aerodynamic forms are less noticeable for radars. Wrong, right?

[Wedmak]

Wrong, right?

Not always. F-117A is an example. The main thing is not to reflect the radar signal in his direction.

[gjv]

Quote: Penetrator

Wrong, right?

If you have time, try reading:
"The method of boundary waves in the physical theory of diffraction", Ufimtsev P. Ya., Ed. Soviet Radio, 1962.
A.N. Lagarkov, M.A. Poghosyan Fundamental and applied problems of stealth technologies // Herald of the RAS. - 2003. - T. 73, No. 9.
Bochkarev A.M., Dolgov M.N. Radar of stealth aircraft // Foreign Radioelectronics. - 1989. - No. 2.

[Vladimirets]

Video pleased, such an open secret. Where are the rockets? Drum roll ... inner compartment !!! Sit down five.

[Zai pali]

Fine, just fine. As I argued with idiots 10 years ago, and said that a strong army is needed.

[ilyaches]

Quote: Zai Pali

Fine, just fine. As I argued with idiots 10 years ago, and said that a strong army is needed.

At one time, if memory serves, Emperor Nicholas said: "Russia has two allies: the army and the navy."

[NordUral]

Today he would add: and the videoconferencing.

[Rus86]

Emperor Alexander III, more precisely

[Wedmak]

In the subject of missiles. Almaz-Antey conducted a field experiment in the case of the crash of MH-17. Very detailed shown. One can imagine that at 800 km / h the cabin will simply break.
I would like to hear the comments of people close to the topic.

[Amurets]

At high penetration rates, 2-3 striking elements were enough to wrap and tear off the skin from aircraft. Especially good photographs were from Vietnam. Not necessarily hits from anti-aircraft missiles. Small-caliber assault rifles successfully operated at low altitudes and, therefore, from their hits, the skin of aircraft plucked often.

[starshina pv]

yes even triangular, the main thing is to find the target and tear it to pieces !!!

[gop]

the rocket operates on the alah-akbar signal and flies there

[staryivoin]

We can build the bridges ourselves ... We build rockets so that NATO and their dark leader understand Russia has experienced a period of weakness. The world is changing. In order not to need missiles, you just need to respect the interests of not only your own but also those of others ... Well, whoever doesn’t understand, he needs missiles in wort

[tomket]

To completely remove the cannon from the sash is not fate at all ...

[kotvov]

It’s not destiny to completely remove the canopy from the sash at all .... ,,
you’re wrong, there are videos showing the test of the sash.

[Lt. Air Force stock]

And what about the new medium-range missile K-77PD / RVV-AE-PD developed for PakFa?
Launch range 180 kilometers.

[Vadim237]

Like the T 50 itself, this rocket will be massively launched after 2020.

[Mercenary]

Something I immediately got sick of going to the radar station along the VUS, even at a distance of more than 250 km. It's time to squeeze robots there or a dozen Shell M-1

[Black Colonel]

Do not like the vertical side surfaces of these missiles. Radar visibility will be greater. Purely my idea. Although, the designers provided, for sure, this problem. Perhaps there is a professional approach than a sofa expert.

[Pro100Igor]

Do not like the vertical side surfaces of these missiles. Radar visibility will be greater. Purely my idea. Although, the designers provided, for sure, this problem. Perhaps there is a professional approach than a sofa expert.

. At a speed three times the speed of sound, the visibility of the rocket will not play a significant role. On the lacquer, it flashes a maximum of two times. According to such data, it will be hard to stop her.

[WUA 518]

Quote: Pro100

At a speed three times the speed of sound, the visibility of the rocket will not play a significant role.

??????????????????

[gjv]

Quote: WUA 518

??????????????????

!!!!!!! ... Small (or big?) Bewilderment (or misunderstanding?). After all, it was a question of anti-radar, to say the X-58USHKE. However and

Quote: Pro100

three times the speed of sound

sounds hyperbolic. After all, the developers themselves believe that

The speed range (numbers M) of the carrier’s flight at the time of launch:
- from the external points of the suspension - 0,47 ... 1,5

[Evkur]

Let's call it "missile defense killer" once firing it, you can blind an entire military base for a very long time !!!!

[Black Colonel]

"missile defense killer"
And what does the missile defense ??? Rather, air defense?

[Buffalo]

The other day, there was information that a prototype engine for PAK DA was successfully tested at Kuznetsov’s company. So, missiles by the way.

[DarkMatter]

Photos of the latest rockets appeared on the Internet

I do not understand which PHOTO APPEARED? This is not a MAX photo? MAX was in summer.
The photo is already unknown how much they hang in the internet, now mid october. good morning

[afrikanez]

To be honest, it’s even unusual to see a rocket of square cross section. It looks just great.