Syrian Islamists are planning a terrorist attack at a Russian air base in Latakia

117
The representative of the Movement for the Liberation of Homs - a faction of the opposition Syrian Free Army, interacting with Al-Qaeda - spoke in an interview with The Daily Beast about plans to introduce a suicide bomber into the staff of the Russian air base in Lattakia.



“At first we will withstand violent aerial bombardments, then we will weaken Russia in all possible ways, including by introducing agents into the armed forces of the regime in order to obtain data on the actions of the Russians. We will carry out operations with the participation of suicide bombers from among the implanted militants, ”he said. "Reedus".

Al-Hourani noted that the strikes of Russian aircraft lead to panic in the ranks of the opposition, and a particularly difficult situation has developed in the enclave between the cities of Homs and Hama in the western region of Syria.

According to him, the militants of the Movement for the Liberation of Homs and the Islamic State are in the dense environment of government units and are subjected to constant air strikes. To counter them, they need to get information about the plans of the troops of Bashar Assad and the Russian military from the inside.

In addition, Al-Hourani appealed to the United States with a request for the supply of modern weapons, in particular, air defense, stressing that the military wing of the Movement for the Liberation of Homs closely cooperates with Al-Qaeda, but is not part of the "Islamic State ".

The Pentagon and NATO have repeatedly repeatedly accused the Russian Federation of attacks on the so-called moderate Syrian opposition, while the data on exactly where their positions are and has not followed. Moreover, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg could not name any armed group that would fight against the Assad regime, not cooperating with the IG and Al-Qaida.
117 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +35
    13 October 2015 12: 19
    "... the militant wing of the Movement for the Liberation of Homs works closely with al-Qaeda, but is not part of the Islamic State."

    No, well then everything is fine. These are moderate, for democracy. The fool is clear.
    1. -128
      13 October 2015 12: 23
      It is not clear what we are counting on there.

      I believe that our main goal in Syria is not ISIS (the international coalition has bombed ISIL for more than a year, and there is no result, it is naive to believe that something will change here from the participation of our Air Force). So the main goal is different. The main goal is to keep Assad's regime in power, at all costs. That means they will bomb everyone who opposes Assad, and this is not only ISIS, but also other opposition groups, including those opposing Assad and ISIS. So we are no longer fighting terrorism, but are becoming participants in the civil war, one of the parties to the civil war. What are the consequences of such a step, history has shown repeatedly.

      I don’t know who Putin’s adviser to Syria, but we put ourselves in an extremely bad strategic situation, as we refused to participate in the international coalition against ISIS, which has already been created. We decided to act on our own. However, we are not in Syria the force on which the development of events depends, we immediately lose initiative and become a subordinate side. Our position here is extremely vulnerable. We depend on how the situation develops on the land theater of operations, which is not modeled by us, but ISIS, the Syrian opposition, Kurds, Assad’s troops and the international coalition. In an environment where Assad’s army is retreating and losing new areas every year, we may be in a situation of direct military conflict on the ground if Assad’s opponents reach our military bases.

      Let's imagine that tomorrow Assad will tell Putin that the Syrian army is exhausted, ISIS or the opposition have broken through in several sectors of the front, and he needs even more military assistance, including ground forces, otherwise our airbase will be under threat. What will Putin answer? There are only two alternatives: we send more troops to Syria, then more, then more, including ground troops, or we wind up all operations and leave Syria, which will be perceived in the world as "fled with wet pants." There are no other options. And both are bad. Now we depend on Assad even more than he does on us.

      In terms of strategy, we got involved in Syria in a very dangerous game that we will not be able to win. Afghanistan and Vietnam also began with small contingents, but every year they only increased.

      We are gradually getting involved in a foreign civil war, rather than participating in the war on international terrorism.
      1. +66
        13 October 2015 12: 33
        Quote: Orel
        С point of view of strategy, we got involved in Syria in a very dangerous game that we will not be able to win.

        Another great strategist - "everything is lost, we will all die." Change your nickname from Eagle to Ostrich. Or Rooster.
        1. +13
          13 October 2015 12: 36
          Penetrator-
          Another strategist:
          apparently at home one channel on a CNN TV box ...
        2. +2
          13 October 2015 14: 26
          broiler is better
      2. -62
        13 October 2015 12: 35
        Why are there so many minuses))) Does everyone here believe that the Syrian army is able to conquer all of Syria with the support of our 30 airplanes and helicopters ??? What did Assad expect these 4 years then, if his army is so strong? 30 planes? Guys. You are crazy. Take off your pink glasses, otherwise you will have to wash your face with blood in the Syrian sands, after the arrival of the summon for the mobilization of reservists.
        1. +22
          13 October 2015 12: 39
          Do you know what they did to alarmists at all times? Find out.
          1. +3
            13 October 2015 14: 27
            shoot right away
        2. +29
          13 October 2015 12: 43
          I explain the minus:
          1. It is necessary to restore control of the Syrian government over the territory.
          2. The international coalition did not work with the Syrian government, so neither the first nor the second made progress. (although it’s still questionable whether the goal of the coalition is the destruction of ISIS)
          3. It seems to me that you are here specifically and knowingly verbally turning the situation around.

          I will not say that you are a mishandled Cossack, let other users decide this.
          1. +10
            13 October 2015 12: 59
            Quote: theadenter
            1. It is necessary to restore control of the Syrian government over the territory.

            First of all, it is necessary to restore control over the border. To interrupt the supply and replenishment in the ranks of the militants. The rest will follow.
            1. +3
              13 October 2015 13: 21
              Of course, the main thing is to cut off the militants from the supply routes. But I doubt that the person to whom I answered - these details will be interesting. So desperately pushing his (is it true?) Point of view.
            2. 0
              13 October 2015 20: 48
              how do you imagine it? arranging the border is an expensive pleasure even for developed countries. and for Syria it is generally impossible. besides, its length in Syria is enormous. The USSR could afford it, but unfortunately Russia is not everywhere. what to say about Syria. I would like to hear something optimistic. but only general phrases. and for what? And How? unclear. besides, there are too many enemies around. and even if the situation is good, with open borders with Turkey and other "neighbors", bandit and terrorist attacks by extremists of all stripes will continue
          2. +5
            13 October 2015 13: 17
            The international coalition bombed both ISIS and the Syrian Army, for the international coalition there is no difference. Now the Syrian army under the umbrella of Russian air defense, that’s perked up. Plus, regular attacks by our Air Force on supply bases, warehouses and convoys of militants significantly weakened their combat potential, and morale. Especially when you know that at any moment a bomb may fall on your head and you cannot stop it.
        3. +15
          13 October 2015 12: 45
          Dear Orel!
          You are slightly (to put it mildly!) NOT IN THE TOPIC.
          Went on a business trip, were a month on the islands, or - otherwise cut off from life?
          It's not about kvass patriotism or pink glasses.
          For a start, read the selection on the topic "Russian Aerospace Forces in Syria" at least on VO. Political, military alignments and prospects for the development of the situation in and around Syria - terribly far from your ideas.
        4. +17
          13 October 2015 12: 49
          Quote: Orel
          Take off your pink glasses, otherwise you will have to wash your face with blood in the Syrian sands, after the arrival of the summon for the mobilization of reservists.

          You made fun of the "mobilization of reservists". Although, even with such a hypothetical possibility, this clearly does not threaten you - if you receive a summons, you will squeal: "I do not intend to die for Abramovich's yacht!" and sdristnesh towards the western border.
        5. The comment was deleted.
        6. +8
          13 October 2015 12: 56
          Quote: Orel
          Why so many minuses)))

          For a statement based on nothing!
          Quote: Orel
          Does everyone here believe that the Syrian army is capable of conquering all of Syria with the support of our 30 airplanes and helicopters ???

          And YOU think that to "pile" poorly trained abreks need 100500 aircraft?
          Quote: Orel
          What did Assad expect these 4 years then, if his army is so strong?

          For 4 years, Assad alone fought off the United States, the EU, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, NATO, etc., and now Russia, Iran, and some others have come.
          Quote: Orel
          Take off your pink glasses, otherwise you will have to wash your face with blood in the Syrian sands, after the arrival of the summon for the mobilization of reservists.

          Do you listen to the President? There will be no ground operation!
          Or do you care, are you on your own wave?
        7. +4
          13 October 2015 13: 08
          Quote: Orel
          Does everyone here believe that the Syrian army is capable of conquering all of Syria with the support of our 30 airplanes and helicopters ???

          Does this tell you anything?
          To fight not by numbers, but by skill?
          Once 30 aircraft perform the task, it means A.V. Suvorov lives, we know how to fight.
        8. +7
          13 October 2015 13: 08
          Why do you need advantages if you are a minus in life ... The fifth column acted in such a way that generated fear, insecurity, rumors, suspicions, panic. The Syrian army was strong enough and that is why it lasted 4 years. Russia also retreated to Moscow and once even burned it ... Only the final result is completely different ...
        9. +6
          13 October 2015 13: 11
          Cons are not for your vision of the problem, but for the fact that there is no need to express such thoughts here. Why think about it. And about washing with blood, it may have to, well, it’s better there than in their cities. I think you as a man should understand this, that you need to protect your family, protect your homeland, and not let the enemy into your house, so that you can expel him from there later. One of my grandfathers after the war said that when they retreated at 41, the old men and women spit after them and shouted that the army was leaving us, running away. Then he reached Kenisberg, the second died at 42. And about Assad’s army, it’s not powerful, it’s normal and aviation is very necessary in such conflicts. Assad did not have it, and there were no pilots or weapons for her. So we can provide very substantial assistance to the ground forces with 30 airplanes. During the Second World War, there was one Messer or the Junkers who caused fear. And when the enemy is afraid and fearful, this is a good groundwork for victory.
        10. +5
          13 October 2015 13: 12
          Quote: Orel
          Why are there so many minuses))) Does everyone here believe that the Syrian army is able to conquer all of Syria with the support of our 30 airplanes and helicopters ??? What did Assad expect these 4 years then, if his army is so strong? 30 planes? Guys. You are crazy. Take off your pink glasses, otherwise you will have to wash your face with blood in the Syrian sands, after the arrival of the summon for the mobilization of reservists.

          Can you take off the pink glasses from your eagle eye?
          Why when the United States needed to remove Hussein in Iraq and Gaddafi in Libya, they bombed them quickly enough despite the fact that these were states that had their own armies, aviation, and air defense systems. And ISIS, which has neither serious air defense, nor aviation, has been bombing this coalition for two years, and they only capture new territories?
          Why, those 50-60 fighters trained by the United States for the so-called "moderate opposition" immediately went over to the side of ISIS along with weapons? And they didn't even stay in the "opposition". Maybe because you can't linger on something that isn't there? And why there are many.
        11. +3
          13 October 2015 13: 13
          Nobody believes that he can. I think that the Syrian army will be able to stabilize the front. To recapture key cities and highways, and then, with the support of the Iranians, will be able to slowly clean up the entire territory. Maybe Russia will open its Lenglis and begin deliveries of T-72, TOS, BTR, BMP, self-propelled guns from storage depots. The accumulation of military equipment and a stable front will continue the offensive to the east of Syria. In the eastern part of Syria, desert regions prevail, where the superiority in aviation will be more significant than in the western. Assad will have to solve a number of tasks, such as agreeing with the Kurds on the federation, expanding the powers of the Sunnis in power and closing the borders tightly, the passage yard that existed earlier will not allow to save the country. Plus, the restoration of the country and the revision of its guidelines when communicating with neighbors, Assad was faced with the fact that Israel is not the only enemy for Syria (Jordan, Turkey and part of Lebanon). We should try to explain to him that the state of Syria will not survive if it continues to pursue an ideology in the spirit of Iran (we will destroy Israel, and whatever happens). It's time to start thinking and as soon as possible.
        12. +8
          13 October 2015 13: 30
          Quote: Orel
          will have to wash themselves with blood in the Syrian sands, after the arrival of the agenda for the mobilization of reservists.

          Dear, for all those like you, the state has already taken care of and prepared a special version of "Warrior".
        13. 0
          13 October 2015 13: 37
          "30 planes?"
          The ISIS has no and never will.
        14. +5
          13 October 2015 13: 47
          There are so many minuses for not moving your brains. There are no idiots who will remove the mobilization reserve from their native expanses to remote theaters of war. Your training manual is not perfect.
        15. -1
          13 October 2015 14: 15
          set a plus, but it turned out that 7 minuses, well, not a miracle, huh?
          1. 0
            14 October 2015 18: 03
            checked on you - minus is normally set.
        16. 0
          13 October 2015 15: 15
          Well, I didn’t convince .... I wouldn’t have sat in the tank with you ... In general, I’d take you out into the open field, put you facing the wall - and a bullet in the forehead.
        17. 0
          13 October 2015 18: 48
          If Assad’s Army wasn’t capable, it wouldn’t have survived 4 years
        18. 0
          15 October 2015 00: 40
          kaolitsiya only pretends to be at war with igil. day bomb the desert at night throw off weapons.
          igil vsegolish instrument of political terror in the hands of the usa wassat
      3. zzz
        zzz
        +22
        13 October 2015 12: 36
        Quote: Orel
        In terms of strategy, we got involved in Syria in a very dangerous game that we will not be able to win

      4. +7
        13 October 2015 12: 37
        I believe that our main goal in Syria is not ISIS (the international coalition has bombed ISIL for more than a year, and there is no result, it is naive to believe that something will change here from the participation of our Air Force). It seems that you have missed the last two weeks. Well, yes, this is our propaganda: that we have done more in a week than the illegitimate coalition led by the SGA. bully Or firmly believe that partners, oh sorry, colleagues are fighting ISIS? laughing And the calculation is primarily economic, political and military. And about the ground operation, the president clearly outlined our position and I believe him.
        1. -26
          13 October 2015 12: 48
          It seems that you have missed the last two weeks. Well, yes, this is our propaganda: that we have done more in a week than the illegitimate coalition led by the SGA. bully Or firmly believe that partners, oh sorry, colleagues are fighting ISIS?


          I have not missed anything. I just don’t see how we can achieve our goals. The goals are global. Destroy ISIS. Do you believe that 30 planes and helicopters are capable of this ??? Or is the Syrian army capable? (what she did then these 4 years, if so strong). So it turns out that Assad is not able to win, and our military intervention is not able to make a decisive contribution to the victory over ISIS. Then the question. Why is this all? If we are going to get involved in the war, then it’s understandable, but it’s still a dead end.
      5. +8
        13 October 2015 12: 37
        "You are a good man, but not Orel" (c) lol
        1. +1
          13 October 2015 17: 12
          Quote: pofigisst74
          You are a good man, but not Orel

          There are different eagles in the world. There are eagles that fly, there are those that feed on carrion(a lot of pecking). Feel the difference!
      6. +4
        13 October 2015 12: 38
        I recommend fortune telling on the cards of some fortuneteller. Maybe something more beautifully predicted than your calculations.
      7. +7
        13 October 2015 12: 40
        You forgot to add "putinslilvsepapalo", do not be distracted from the training manual.
      8. +5
        13 October 2015 12: 41
        Change the nickname from the eagle to something softer.
      9. +10
        13 October 2015 12: 42
        Quote: Orel
        I don’t know who Putin’s adviser to Syria, but we put ourselves in an extremely bad strategic situation, as we refused to participate in the international coalition against ISIS, which has already been created.

        Dear, you didn’t eat whites by chance? Who is it, and who should it join?
        You probably forgot that it was precisely Russia that acts in Syria legitimately, and that it complies with all international obligations.
        Quote: Orel

        In terms of strategy, we got involved in Syria in a very dangerous game that we will not be able to win. Afghanistan and Vietnam also began with small contingents, but every year they only increased.

        Are you not a liberal democrat?
        Obviously, you have one of these habits, everything is gone.
      10. +12
        13 October 2015 12: 44
        Quote: Orel
        I don’t know who is Putin’s adviser in Syria,

        well that's not you
        Quote: Orel
        but we put ourselves in an extremely bad strategic situation

        Who are "we? I’m embarrassed to ask ... Does your military education allow you to talk about strategy?
        Quote: Orel
        but we put ourselves in an extremely bad strategic situation, as we refused to participate in the international coalition against ISIS, which has already been created

        Quote: Orel
        We decided to act on our own. However, we are not in Syria the force on which the development of events depends, we immediately lose initiative and become a subordinate side.

        Do you even understand what you are writing? Well, Klitschko is clear, the brains are beaten off. You are contradicting yourself in three lines.
        Being the head of a rat is better than the tail of an elephant (Russian folk wisdom)
        Quote: Orel
        We are gradually getting involved in a foreign civil war, rather than participating in the war on international terrorism.

        Do not read before dinner, at night, and in the morning liberal media
        1. -17
          13 October 2015 12: 56
          Who are "we? I’m embarrassed to ask ... Does your military education allow you to talk about strategy?


          And your military education allows you to believe that 30 aircraft can destroy ISIS?)))
          1. +15
            13 October 2015 13: 18
            Quote: Orel
            And your military education allows you to believe that 30 aircraft can destroy ISIS?)))

            My education and some combat experience let me know:
            - if you sit tight in a trench and don’t snarl, then they will first be bombarded with mines, then with hand grenades, eventually they will throw donkey shit ... and they will shoot in the same trench
            - I also think that war is fueled by supplies. Roads are the arteries of war. Transport is her blood. It is necessary not only to pound forehead on the forehead, but also to break down well-functioning mechanisms. No b / p - no shooting. There is no food and water, no rest - no physical strength. No salary - the mercenaries fell out.
            - an adversary who walks to his full height without any concern, overgrows with fortifications, develops infrastructure, impudes, accumulates fats and reserves. He begins to think about gold and white captives, which Russia has a lot of infidels ... so, for me, let him crawl on his belly, dirty and hungry, and think how to save the skin under the bombs, and is it better to squander, because along with the Russian bombs on the ground is the Syrian army.
          2. +3
            13 October 2015 13: 35
            Even 30 aircraft (PO-2) during the Great Patriotic War, controlled by girls, caused awe, fear and respect from the Nazi army. Only in Syria is far from PO-2. Therefore, knowing for what purposes they work, what ammunition they use, and their performance characteristics. it can be assumed that such a quantity is enough to bring another 2 or 3 unfriendly countries in the neighborhood into a non-operational state.
      11. +12
        13 October 2015 12: 46
        Of course, you’re an outstanding strategist and analyst, but thank God, the position of an ostrich with his head in the sand and an ass at the top would not have done well. Where would ISIS go after Assad’s fall on a guess from Washington guess 3 times. And this coalition is oh don’t tell my cat, following your liberal values, it’s too expensive to bomb dunes, excavators, weddings and hospitals, so join the coalition yourself
        1. -19
          13 October 2015 12: 50
          If you are all for the war and are so brave, then pack your bags and go volunteers to fight for Assad. Your position is even more cowardly than mine.
          1. +3
            13 October 2015 13: 21
            Quote: Orel
            If you are all for the war and are so brave, then pack your bags and go volunteers to fight for Assad. Your position is even more cowardly than mine.


            And you are also a demagogue, besides ... everyone should do their job and do well. If it’s a doctor, then it’s good to treat it, if it’s a military man, he can fight skillfully ... that means if he is a citizen of Russia, then defending Russia's interests is most effective, i.e. in accordance with their profession.

            So your words, like, but why don’t you fight in Syria, are not worth a damn !!!

            What kind of eagle you are, you ... "vdorzhyvopryzhvryvzhi" ... there are simply no normal words on you !!! am
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. +3
            13 October 2015 13: 56
            Quote: Orel
            If you are all for the war and so brave

            Do you know why the state of Israel is still alive?
            Because they are wolves, not a herd of bleating sheep. Their policies have a lot of dark spots, are contradictory, and their methods do not shine with sterility. But ... they have been living in a "bearded environment" for a long time. They wave black flags and knives around them, but they know that if necessary, the Jews will mix them with mud, and so that feathers, and black flags, and knives will fly.
          4. +4
            13 October 2015 14: 15
            Quote: Orel
            go to fight for Assad.

            What does Assad have to do with it ?, pilots are fighting for Russia's interests.

            Quote: Orel
            Your position is even more cowardly than mine.

            Where is it more cowardly ...?
      12. +3
        13 October 2015 12: 49
        Not an eagle, not an eagle at all. And so .... No.
      13. +11
        13 October 2015 12: 55
        Boris Borisych? Nadezhdin? It is you?
      14. +5
        13 October 2015 12: 59
        Quote: Orel
        I don’t know who Putin’s adviser to Syria, but we put ourselves in an extremely bad strategic situation, as we refused to participate in the international coalition against ISIS, which has already been created.

        Are you sure this coalition was created against ISIS? And not to protect the so-called. the "moderate" opposition, which fights exclusively against Assad, and constantly loses when meeting with ISIS and al-Qaeda, losing weapons right in their original packaging?

        In addition, let me remind you that last month the coalition discussed the issue of a no-fly zone and open deliveries of weapons to Syria. And what a "no-fly zone" is all well remembered in Libya.
        Quote: Orel
        We depend on how the situation develops on the land theater of operations, which is not modeled by us, but ISIS, the Syrian opposition, Kurds, Assad’s troops and the international coalition.

        You forgot two more players who are actively fighting on earth: Hezbollah and Iran behind it.
        Quote: Orel
        We are gradually getting involved in a foreign civil war, rather than participating in the war on international terrorism.

        The problem is that this civil war is essentially being waged by terrorists. And "moderate" puppets simply supply them with weapons, simulating battles.

        In addition, as the events of recent days show, the air strikes of the aerospace forces and the navy are not bad at promoting dialogue on an intra-Syrian settlement with the true owners of those fighting against Assad.
      15. +7
        13 October 2015 13: 02
        I apologize-- hi But really, Bashar al-Assad has not proved in so many years of fighting against scumbags that he will not leave Syria and his people hi , and the main backbone of the Syrian army is far from being prepared by the amers "armed forces of Iraq, Afghanistan, etc., etc.", I think Assad understands everything perfectly and remembers Gaddafi's will hi .My humble opinion. With respect to all members of the forum hi
      16. +3
        13 October 2015 13: 04
        repost this crap in your ear ... oh, of course, on Echo of Moscow and the Censor - you will collect a lot of plus signs.
        1. -11
          13 October 2015 13: 17
          I understand that it is difficult to think logically, when victorious reports are broadcast from all the media, but this must be done ... Do not exaggerate or overestimate the capabilities of Assad and Russia in this conflict. Underestimating the enemy and reassessing one’s strength is a definite defeat. While you are reasoning everything in this vein.
          1. +7
            13 October 2015 13: 29
            Quote: Orel
            I understand that it is difficult to think logically, when victorious reports are broadcast from all the media, but this must be done ... Do not exaggerate or overestimate the capabilities of Assad and Russia in this conflict. Underestimating the enemy and reassessing one’s strength is a definite defeat. While you are reasoning everything in this vein.


            Well, enlightened us, the orphans and the dead, you are our light. You are our all-logical logician, appreciated it means that only you alone are correct, and all our intelligence, and all Syrian intelligence, Iranian ... are dumb and stupid ...

            But you, in fact, offer to bow to the mattresses to go ... and if you were at the beginning of World War II, how would you sing ... everything, it's time to give up, that would save people ...? Do you know who you are after this, to tell or guess yourself?
          2. The comment was deleted.
      17. The comment was deleted.
      18. +2
        13 October 2015 13: 15
        Orel SU Today, 12:23 ↑
        It is unclear what we are counting on there .... From the point of view of strategy, we got involved in Syria in a very dangerous game that we will not be able to win.

        K-a-a-a-a-no! Blame for everything ... blame all around! "White and fluffy" guys, pupils of the most democratic government on Earth, dared to bomb. They are all Democrats and fighters for the American way of life! N-e-e-e-zya so! And they are even more to blame for the fact that:
        The militants of the Homs Liberation Movement and Islamic State are surrounded by government units and are subjected to constant air strikes. To counter them, it is necessary to obtain data on the plans of the troops of Bashar al-Assad and the Russian military from the inside.

        Due to the fact that no one at all tells ... where the Russian Aerospace Forces will fly ... where the strike will be !!! Previously, the Judas were in the Syrian Armed Forces ... but now they are worn out ... however ... In the Russian contingent, no one is interested in obtaining "30 pieces of silver" ...
        But the worst thing is that the Russian Federation REFUSED FOR THREE DAYS TO REPORT THIS Amer before the air strike! How to fight, if there is NO INFORMATION FROM THE OWNER and you do not know WHEN AND WHERE TO GO, AND WHEN IT IS NECESSARY TO MAKE FEET .... If it goes on like this, then I MAY rather, and not MONEY EARN ...
        Most Russians do not fight correctly!
        1. -7
          13 October 2015 13: 28
          Simple question. What did the Syrian army do for 4 years? Why didn’t she liberate the country, if so strong? Why did she wait for Russian intervention and retreat? 30 aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces - is Assad's decisive advantage in the war or what ???

          The answer is on the surface. Assad does not have the military strength to win on earth. Who will give these ground forces? It is not clear yet. Nobody wants to provide them. This means that all this "beautiful picture" from TV does not bring decisive results. If the goals are not achieved, then the resources are wasted. The goal is to destroy ISIS. So we stated. Now think about how this is possible, given the above facts that are available. It cannot be denied. Assad is weak. Infantry and tanks should be sent either by Russia or Iran. Iran will not interfere on a large scale, they have the lifting of sanctions on their noses. We, I don't know, would not want to, we do not have the physical strength for this. This is objective.
      19. +5
        13 October 2015 13: 34
        I haven’t set a minus yet, but I’ll indicate what is wrong in your text, as it seems to me personally.
        Quote: Orel
        I believe that our main goal in Syria is not ISIS (the international coalition has bombed ISIL for more than a year, and there is no result, it is naive to believe that something will change here from the participation of our Air Force).

        Here you have two false statements. First of all, our target is the Isis. It is in its ranks that the inhabitants of the Caucasus and Central Asia are fighting, who, upon returning, will recruit "brothers" for a holy war against Russia in order to build a caliphate, as Basayev once tried to do by attacking Dagestan from Chechnya, although the real goal of these bandits is simply to cut and kill people with impunity, to receive money from the USA and NATO, and of course to rape a bunch of girls, each to have a harem of hundreds of slaves. This is the goal of every Igil bandit. Islam is a cover for robbery and murder.
        And the second statement - the international coalition is not bombing the igil or bombing, it "sucked" money from its taxpayers, since the salaries there are higher than ours, in order to depict the conduct of the war, as if they are bombing, although in reality, shells are dropped somewhere in the bombs, but in reality what the West was doing was just supplying the militants with weapons and equipment, "accidentally" dropping them on their heads. In this they have succeeded so much that this igil has grown to two-thirds of the territory of Syria and Iraq. Compare with the effect that the Russian aviation achieved in just a week of battles.
        Quote: Orel
        keep Assad in power at all costs

        Assad’s regime needs to be preserved not so much because he is personally attractive to Russia, but because he is the legitimately elected president of Syria and secular authorities. And who do you think is more worthy than he is for power in Syria, Islamist radicals cutting heads? whoever it is, it will be the choice of the Syrian people only, after clearing the country of the infection of the igils, they will most likely hold a referendum in Crimea, to decide how many parts Syria will break up, and who will rule the confederation.
        Quote: Orel
        In an environment where Assad’s army is retreating and losing new areas every year, we may be in a situation of direct military conflict on the ground if Assad’s opponents reach our military bases.

        Assad's army, if you do not watch the news and read, is now busy only with liberating city after city from igils. And in the case of approaching our bases, the Russian Federation has and cooler bombs than "caliber" missiles that can incinerate a territory comparable to a city, so they will not get there.
        Quote: Orel
        We are gradually getting involved in a foreign civil war, rather than participating in the war on international terrorism.

        civil war is when their own people of one country are fighting for power, for a regime which they believe will be more appropriate for the country, and the army is fighting for the army. And when hastily gathered bandits, thugs from different countries slaughter and kill citizens, the inhabitants of one country do not care about the country at all - this is genocide, this is intervention, this is terrorism.
        1. -10
          13 October 2015 13: 46
          ISIS can be defeated only by a common front, and it will not be until Assad is in power. No matter how regrettable it may sound, Assad must leave. The Syrian army will remain, but will receive the support of all key players (both from the West and from the East) and then ISIS will be able to defeat. While Assad is in power, his opponents on earth will be fed with everything necessary and the alignment here is not in our favor. To calculate the defeat of Assad, one calculator is enough. This is already arithmetically calculated. Assad must sacrifice his power to restore the country. Otherwise, the Syrian army will be exhausted, destroyed and conquered Syria will be no one.
          1. +3
            13 October 2015 15: 20
            storyteller. the Syrian army for 4 years was destroyed by the whole world and it is still combat ready. the world is not blind to see who has cheated where and supporters of the actions of the Russian Federation more and more.
          2. +1
            13 October 2015 22: 42
            Quote: Orel
            ISIS can be defeated only by a common front, and it will not be until Assad is in power. No matter how regrettable it may sound, Assad must leave. The Syrian army will remain, but will receive the support of all key players (both from the West and from the East) and then ISIS will be able to defeat. While Assad is in power, his opponents on earth will be fed with everything necessary and the alignment here is not in our favor. To calculate the defeat of Assad, one calculator is enough. This is already arithmetically calculated. Assad must sacrifice his power to restore the country. Otherwise, the Syrian army will be exhausted, destroyed and conquered Syria will be no one.

            Absolutely false concept - Events that happened earlier (Iraq and Libya) proved this. The Syrian government army only keeps it because it is rallied around Assad.
      20. +3
        13 October 2015 13: 35
        "... if Assad's opponents get to our military bases."
        One of the key phrases. They, opponents of Assad, can only be reached there under guard and with their trousers cut.
        "... when Assad's army retreats and loses new areas every year."
        The latest data does not match your statements.
        To you -
      21. +3
        13 October 2015 13: 42
        Picked up :-) :-) :-)
        1. -8
          13 October 2015 13: 51
          Picked up :-) :-) :-)


          The cons do not bother me much. I just wonder how many "hurray-patriots" we have. It's nice to find pluses in your posts, but that's not the main thing. The main thing is that there are still people who are able to think critically. So there is hope.
          1. +2
            13 October 2015 13: 57
            Thank you all for the discussion. And those who are "for" and those who are "against". I respect the opinion of everyone, but unfortunately I do not agree with the majority. Good luck to all! ;) I apologize for not being able to answer everyone, there are a lot of you)))
            1. +7
              13 October 2015 14: 22
              Quote: Orel
              Thank you all for the discussion. And those who are "for" and those who are "against".

              Yes-ah, not sickly Orel conducted a "poll" on the topic of the Russian Aerospace Forces being in Syria! laughing Obviously, someone is probing the mood of Russian citizens on this issue.
          2. +11
            13 October 2015 14: 14
            Quote: Orel
            Picked up :-) :-) :-)


            The cons do not bother me much. I just wonder how many "hurray-patriots" we have. It's nice to find pluses in your posts, but that's not the main thing. The main thing is that there are still people who are able to think critically. So there is hope.

            You have a bad hope for VO, then ostriches hiding their heads in the sand, and then when he gets a bearded shaitan they don’t greet him to put up his head, so you’d better go to the State Department’s Echo or rain, they’ll warm it, pat it on your head, cry there, a cookie receive, and here it seems to you it will be difficult for sdes.
      22. +5
        13 October 2015 13: 54
        Quote: Orel
        It is not clear what we are counting on there.
        I believe that our main goal in Syria is not ISIS (the international coalition has bombed ISIL for more than a year, and there is no result, it is naive to believe that something will change here from the participation of our Air Force). So the main goal is different.

        You make a mistake and answer it yourself ...
        1) It is naive to believe that coalition air forces bomb them at all.
        2) Do you really think that after inflicting 28 thousand blows in a year and dropping about 70 thousand bombs, they fell on ISIS? Even if there was a bomb for every action movie, this organization had to lose half of its members.
        3) Russia in 1 week delivered 112 attacks and destroyed:
        Command points 19
        Ammunition depots, fuel and lubricants, weapons 12
        Explosive factories 9
        Armored vehicles 71
        Manpower 380 fighters
      23. +5
        13 October 2015 13: 57
        I read your message to the end of Orel. Although after these lines
        I was personally struck by laughter
        Quote: Orel
        as refused to participate in the international coalition against ISISalready created.

        What coalition? Coalition wants to remove Assad Therefore, according to your words, the special forces of the GRU of the Russian Federation should physically destroy Assad and for this Barak would give Vova a candy with the words well done Vovchik, are you now my favorite poodle and not Cameron? laughing

        Quote: Orel
        However, we are not in Syria the force on which the development of events depends, we immediately lose the initiative and become a subordinate.

        We would be a subordinate if we entered into a coalition that is tightly controlled from Washington.

        Quote: Orel
        Syrian army exhausted, ISIS broke through in several sections of the front

        We have been hearing this mantra for 4 years ... Unlike Libya, Syria has been holding these same 4 years despite the weapons of the States, Saudi-Qatars grandmothers, ISIS training camps in Turkey and Jordan ... + You generally map the military operations in Syria watched when was the last time ??? Where exactly is ISIS and how far is it from Latakia?

        Summing up:
        To fight ISIS and all other groups that will join him (most likely it will be because the "Dark Lord" will bring everyone together in order to declare "Paid Jihad" to Russia) in Syria there is someone - Kurds, Syrians Alawites / Shiites, Lebanese, Iranians. The first three, when Assad is defeated, will have one alternative to cutting off the head and they know about it Iran, a similar fate awaits a few years later ... So that there is someone to fight and the motivation is the most that neither is strong - NOT TO LOSE LIFE.

        And according to your "Analysis" similar to a hackneyed record of "liberals from 90", one can say one thing he gives -Incompetence.
      24. The comment was deleted.
      25. +1
        13 October 2015 14: 00
        Quote: Orel
        It is not clear what we are counting on there.

        I will say briefly - Eyes open!

        For the fact that on "YOU" sorry, but this phrase does not imply any other treatment, not that calico.
      26. 0
        13 October 2015 14: 25
        have you been given much silver coins?
      27. +1
        13 October 2015 14: 49
        You can enter the coalition, it is important when. First you need to finish everything that goes along the border with Turkey, this is not ISIS, but from there the supply goes, and there the oil goes. And then you can fight ISIS together. That would then not to share power in Syria with anyone. In this game, everyone has two aces fake in his pocket and no one needs fair play.
      28. 0
        13 October 2015 14: 49
        You can enter the coalition, it is important when. First you need to finish everything that goes along the border with Turkey, this is not ISIS, but from there the supply goes, and there the oil goes. And then you can fight ISIS together. That would then not to share power in Syria with anyone. In this game, everyone has two aces fake in his pocket and no one needs fair play.
      29. 0
        13 October 2015 15: 26
        The eagle "wanted to get up and say a clever thing, it turned out to lie on the floor and fart" (c) lol even minus laziness that crap ...
      30. 0
        13 October 2015 15: 31
        not an eagle or even a falcon ...
    2. 0
      13 October 2015 16: 12
      Quote: teron
      No, well then everything is fine. These are moderate, for democracy. The fool is clear.

      Well, for the moderate, the aerospace forces in Syria have moderate bombs. Pink in flowers and birds bully
  2. +7
    13 October 2015 12: 19
    The enemy is cunning and treacherous. Warrior - be vigilant !!!
  3. +6
    13 October 2015 12: 19
    Well, the al-Qaeda affiliate has gone nuts! Give them air defense ... Won't you be bad, gentlemen "moderate"? Well, as for the suicide bombers ... Now you all walk under Allah, the videoconferencing just help you meet him as quickly as possible.
  4. +6
    13 October 2015 12: 19
    Well, now the real work and the opportunity to show their professional suitability for the special services of Syria have appeared. The main thing is that they do not oversleep this special contingent.
  5. zzz
    zzz
    +6
    13 October 2015 12: 20
    Are you ready to accept the answer?
  6. +4
    13 October 2015 12: 20
    "... on the supply of modern weapons ..."
    Somewhere this request met me! Now, however, the beggar petition was somehow forgotten ... Not up to him, miserable!
  7. +12
    13 October 2015 12: 21
    It’s good that the shaitans give an interview. Whoever is warned is armed. Let the shaitan live until at least tomorrow the scarecrow kuev
  8. +11
    13 October 2015 12: 21
    Something was not heard of their threat when the Americans bombed
  9. +5
    13 October 2015 12: 21
    Well, the "moderate" showed their faces.
  10. +4
    13 October 2015 12: 22
    In addition, Al-Khurani turned to the United States with a request for the supply of modern weapons, in particular, air defense systems, stressing that the combat wing of the Homs Liberation Movement works closely with al-Qaida, but is not part of the Islamic State "

    It is very interesting how they got together to officially ask for support with weapons from America, given that Al-Qaeda is an organization officially recognized by the UN, and by the US itself as a terrorist one. Like "maybe he can ride"?
  11. +7
    13 October 2015 12: 22
    "First, we will withstand the violent aerial bombardment, then ..." Whoever survives will shave off their beards and go to Europe
  12. +3
    13 October 2015 12: 22
    And the USA will provide them with suicide bombers?
  13. +6
    13 October 2015 12: 23
    And how do they want to enter the staff? Yes, there probably is a check on the base using technical means, and not all objects in the local community should have access ... I can’t imagine, to be honest, how it will be if there are means of checking the regime at the air base ...
    1. +2
      13 October 2015 12: 27
      I agree, this is not to go to the supermarket. To penetrate such a closed facility, and even in wartime it is more difficult than to be born back to mother.
      1. +1
        13 October 2015 12: 46
        "A donkey laden with gold will pass through any gate."
  14. +4
    13 October 2015 12: 23
    Forewarned is forearmed!
  15. +1
    13 October 2015 12: 25
    In addition, Al-Hourani appealed to the United States with a request for the supply of modern weapons, in particular, air defense, stressing that the military wing of the Movement for the Liberation of Homs closely cooperates with Al-Qaeda, but is not part of the "Islamic State ". I do not understand. Al-Qaeda is considered a terrorist organization in the states. Also at the UN. Annusra under which brand they hide is also considered ter. organization. It is not possible that this bearded man knows something and is sure of help.
  16. 0
    13 October 2015 12: 26
    The Pentagon and NATO have repeatedly repeatedly accused the Russian Federation of attacks on the so-called moderate Syrian opposition, while the data on exactly where their positions are and has not followed. Moreover, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg could not name any armed group that would fight against the Assad regime, not cooperating with the IG and Al-Qaida.

    Where can they (and to whom?) Help deliver? Most states were clouded and lost. Would be pricked in a pure: true goals, agents of influence and communication, the goals of the created man-made mess ...
  17. hartlend
    +1
    13 October 2015 12: 27
    Forewarned is forearmed.
    1. +2
      13 October 2015 12: 37
      It’s a pity, I didn’t give the names, it would be very good. wink
  18. artmoney
    -37
    13 October 2015 12: 28
    I hope the Americans tossed the stingers .. the pilots must land and then they are getting impudent
    1. +18
      13 October 2015 12: 31
      .... I hope the Americans tossed the stingers .. the airstrikers need to be landed, or else they are being impudent ...

      .... got lost heart ???? ..... Scatter !!!!! ..... On the censor ..... There is your place !!!!
      1. +6
        13 October 2015 12: 36
        they already started to run away from him, so it stinks there :-)
    2. +6
      13 October 2015 12: 36
      Quote: artmoney
      I hope the Americans tossed the stingers .. the pilots must land and then they are getting impudent

      Fight in the cache. There, the Javelins are waiting for you.
    3. +4
      13 October 2015 12: 37
      Sala to the heroes?
    4. +3
      13 October 2015 12: 41
      Quote: artmoney
      I hope the Americans ...

      You should not hope for idiots ...
    5. +2
      13 October 2015 12: 52
      Quote: artmoney
      it is necessary to land and then they are impudent

      , Characteristics, study the stingers and aircraft, sparrows will be shot down with the Americans together.
    6. The comment was deleted.
    7. +2
      13 October 2015 12: 58
      What's Durk open day? laughing
      1. 0
        13 October 2015 15: 22
        do not say some kind of influx (wise men)
    8. +3
      13 October 2015 13: 02
      Quote: artmoney
      I hope the Americans tossed the stingers .. the pilots must land and then they are getting impudent

      Oh yes ... Americans are sleeping and seeing how to better equip those whom they themselves bomb. For the moderate opposition has already become famous for the regular surrender of weapons to the opposition implacable.
      And how neighboring Israel will be glad to supply the latest MANPADS of the latest models ...
    9. 0
      13 October 2015 14: 16
      They will throw it, only then all these weapons will fall to the Syrian army and for one proof there will be one hundred percent that the United States armed the militants.
    10. +1
      13 October 2015 15: 45
      how hearted you are crying got drunk overdue cookies, duck is now not like urine, already diarrhea in the head beats belay
    11. 0
      13 October 2015 22: 03
      Quote: artmoney
      I hope the Americans tossed the stingers .. the pilots must land and then they are getting impudent

      ---------------------
      Do you yourself write from the pub? Do you visit "Eternal Call" and "Life-Giving Stream" in the evenings?
    12. 0
      13 October 2015 22: 45
      Quote: artmoney
      I hope the Americans tossed the stingers .. the pilots must land and then they are getting impudent

      Go away!
  19. +3
    13 October 2015 12: 28
    RESULT, really, therefore, ours are fucking them! ... hi
    - Well, for the hunt, Mikhalych! drinks
  20. +3
    13 October 2015 12: 29
    Thanks for the warning! I think who should be heard.
  21. +4
    13 October 2015 12: 33
    Here on the site, all of you, users, as if specially for ISIS and the like, have already held a meeting on the topic "How to bomb, destroy, inflict maximum damage on our Aerospace Forces in Syria", even with the involvement of experienced combatants.
    Probably it’s not necessary to lay out such considerations here, leave them to yourself, the site is not only used by patriotic Russians, I think the enemies respect it, and find a lot of interesting things for themselves!
    1. +1
      13 October 2015 12: 59
      That's right, anyone has a reason, thoughts, experience, communicate with the same well in closed mode. not on a public site. I already wrote about this. started to minus.
  22. +3
    13 October 2015 12: 35
    the feeling that the speechwriter was written to him by the same speechwriter as John Kerry
  23. +6
    13 October 2015 12: 36
    something like that inspired
  24. +2
    13 October 2015 12: 36
    Well, well, where is this "moderate opposition", everything is the same, terrorists do not say, at least on the left, at least on the right, at least from top to bottom, one devil is only a side view, therefore subject to immediate complete destruction ...
  25. +1
    13 October 2015 12: 39
    It seems that this "oppositionist" is 15 years old ... "Moderate" Al-Qaeda, martyrs at a military base, air defense systems - did Patriot study well? Or send instructors too? Kindergarten, by itself the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine! wassat
    Another duck from "The Daily Beast", they came up with it themselves - they spread it themselves, they dragged Al-Qaeda so that other idiots would not seriously bother with the supply of aid, otherwise they would have to answer for the fake. request
    IMHO
  26. +2
    13 October 2015 12: 46
    In general, at first I didn’t even understand why our planes were not in shelters, but in taxiing, built in a ruler.
    It is clear that it was easier to maintain. And ours are not afraid of artillery raid, since they blocked the entire district within a radius of 15 km.
    Against sabotage by the local - there is no protection. Whether you’ve been tested three times, your family is at risk, they will take the child, and they will blackmail you with his life. It just takes time, intelligence work, experienced personnel for any such action. The key word is time. Give them six months - get with a high degree of probability. For a month - the probability is much less.
  27. +1
    13 October 2015 12: 50
    Al who? Hunyani, do not overdo it, otherwise your head will burst from dreams.
  28. +1
    13 October 2015 12: 53
    When the Mongols came to Russia, they shouted: "We are dark!", And our soldiers answered them: "don't give a shit." The same is necessary to answer the bandits. The time will come to all of them will be sentenced to life ... from a slingshot in the balls!
  29. +1
    13 October 2015 12: 57
    Quote: zzz
    Are you ready to accept the answer?

    Right! How about basking in the sun? Yes, and hail in the desert can begin, and a hurricane, and rooks may fly by, and ducklings ... negative
  30. +1
    13 October 2015 12: 58
    Quote: Orel
    We are gradually getting involved in a foreign civil war, rather than participating in the war on international terrorism.

    Come on ahead of time to panic. There will be no second Afghanistan, I personally believe in GDP (I have proved it more than once with my actions). And what our people are doing in Syria right now, everyone should understand this. Otherwise, sooner or later Beslan will be again and, God forbid, that is worse. soldier
  31. +2
    13 October 2015 12: 58
    Soon the sun will be sunbathing on the way.
  32. 0
    13 October 2015 13: 09
    I wonder how long the so-called IS, if it weren’t for the former officers of Saddam and the presence of supplies across the Turkish border? I read statements by IS figures and I understand that it’s good to run distillations with commanders like Al-Khurani wassat .
  33. 0
    13 October 2015 13: 19
    Cutting off from the supply is feasible? I think this is what happens. The Americans are in trouble, they are dropping the cargo. But this is fixable if from the ground by a "stinger", and who and what and X .. knows him, there are no such groupings.
  34. 0
    13 October 2015 13: 21
    Whatever it was, but this reptile (ISIS) must be crushed, once climbed - it is necessary to achieve success
  35. +1
    13 October 2015 13: 26
    Quote: coconut tim
    "First, we will withstand the violent aerial bombardment, then ..." Whoever survives will shave off their beards and go to Europe



    and Europe is waiting for them !!!
  36. +1
    13 October 2015 13: 26
    Quote: Orel
    And your military education allows you to believe that 30 aircraft can destroy ISIS?))

    It is impossible to completely destroy ISIS from the air. But to deprive the Malomalski of ammunition depots, command posts and training camps - completely.
    Modern warfare devours ammunition, it is difficult to estimate the total cost of ammunition in such a war, but I think they amount to tens of tons per day. Now imagine the supply of hundreds of small groups of terrorists from warehouses of 2-3 zinc on donkeys, because all transport will also be destroyed.
    Military logistics is one of the most important components of modern warfare. This sword does not need anything, and any firearm requires a lot of ammunition, mortars and artillery in general guard for logisticians. And this is not counting provisions for troops, uniforms, fuel and lubricants, etc. (However, ISIS is not quite an army)
    As a result, our air strikes will reduce the war to a partisan one, and this is already the case for the Syrian army, even later after the destruction of large groups of militants, for the Ministry of Internal Affairs and special services.
    So do not write about the philosophical discourse on the stupidity and futility of war ...
    1. +4
      13 October 2015 14: 01
      The Syrian army, unfortunately, does not control the border
      with Turkey. From there is a continuous supply
      ammunition for militants. Some groups share with others
      (for the right to transport through its territory).
      As a result, all groups are armed.
      1. +3
        13 October 2015 23: 05
        Kurds control almost half. With the support of Russia and the loyalty of the Kurds, Assad is able to return the rest of the border, though if he does not chew the snot and finally negotiates with the Kurds, only weapons and ammunition come from Iraq.
  37. -4
    13 October 2015 13: 42
    Quote: Maxom75
    Nobody believes that he can. I think that the Syrian army will be able to stabilize the front. To recapture key cities and highways, and then, with the support of the Iranians, will be able to slowly clean up the entire territory. Maybe Russia will open its Lenglis and begin deliveries of T-72, TOS, BTR, BMP, self-propelled guns from storage depots. The accumulation of military equipment and a stable front will continue the offensive to the east of Syria. In the eastern part of Syria, desert regions prevail, where the advantage in aviation will be more significant than in the western. Assad will have to solve a number of tasks, such as agreeing with the Kurds on the federation, expanding the powers of the Sunnis in power and closing the borders tightly, the passage yard that existed earlier will not allow to save the country.


    Much of this has already been done. No result. Many are not destined to come true. Arms have been delivered for a long time. Have you heard of the Syrian Express? The Sunnis were allowed into power, they promised reforms. But as the saying goes: "It's too late to drink Borjomi". The point of no return has been passed. Assad is doomed. The only question is in time and in the conditions of his departure.
  38. The comment was deleted.
  39. 0
    13 October 2015 18: 03
    Quote: Penetrator
    Quote: Orel
    С point of view of strategy, we got involved in Syria in a very dangerous game that we will not be able to win.

    Another great strategist - "everything is lost, we will all die." Change your nickname from Eagle to Ostrich. Or Rooster.

    Apparently, this is not an "eagle", but a bald eagle.
  40. 0
    13 October 2015 18: 10
    Quote: voyaka uh
    The Syrian army, unfortunately, does not control the border
    with Turkey. From there is a continuous supply
    ammunition for militants. Some groups share with others
    (for the right to transport through its territory).
    As a result, all groups are armed.

    This is all true, but ... one must strive to destroy the militants and take control of the border.
    As for the attacks against Russian bases, I think that there will undoubtedly be attempts, but here our (and Syrian) SB card is in hand.

    By the way, with regards to the Syrian Free Army:
    "There is a video where the chief of staff of the Syrian Free Army, General Salim Idris, calls IS his brothers, telling how they jointly captured the Abu Dukhur airfield.

    This is the very "moderate Syrian opposition" that the West is shielding today. Therefore, today the question is not about the salvation of Assad, but about the salvation of the Syrians themselves, and Russia intervened in a timely manner. "
    http://warfiles.ru/show-97480-siriyskaya-svobodnaya-armiya-nazvala-ig-svoimi-bra
    tami.html
  41. 0
    13 October 2015 21: 37
    There’s nothing bad, you’ll see. So far, all Putna’s moves have been based on 100% calculations that the actions will be successful. Example -Crimea, as they screamed that it was all the beginning of the war and the Russians shamefully escaped, they scared the terrorist attacks not childishly. Nitsche-all a bunch.
    The same thing is with Syria, the president clearly said in an interview - yes, we have thought through and calculated everything, there is no reason not to believe him.
    And then, why repeat the obvious nonsense about the second Agan? Officially announced - we will not participate in the ground operation. Even if everything is bad, there are still so many new bombs and warheads that have not been tested and are waiting in the wings. Russia can make quite simply a lunar landscape from the entire Middle East.
    You don’t need to be afraid of the fact that America and comrades will fit in for him - they will not fit in until the bombs fall on their heads, they will express concern, wrinkle their faces and endure, there is no particular fool to exchange a well-fed life for a quick death.