Military Review

US official: Iranian test of a ballistic missile violates UN resolution

15
Iran’s recent ballistic missile test contradicts UN Security Council resolution number 1929, CNN reported, citing a US administration official.




RIA News recalls that on Sunday the Iranian media reported on the successful testing of a ballistic missile. Information was shared with the press by Defense Minister Hossein Dehgan.

As the source said, “if based on information from open sources, the test is a violation of the UN Security Council resolution 1929, which stipulates that Iran cannot participate in any activities related to ballistic missiles.”

At the same time, he stressed that the test launch “does not contradict the nuclear agreement reached in July between Iran and the six countries, since the agreement will focus on limiting access to nuclear arms».

According to him, there is another resolution of the UN Security Council - the 2231 number - on reaching this agreement and "banning Iran from taking part in events related to ballistic missiles designed to deliver nuclear warheads." However, this resolution has not yet entered into force.
Photos used:
AFP 2015
15 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Dreiko11
    Dreiko11 13 October 2015 08: 36 New
    13
    as the Americans are testing something, this is for defense purposes, as other countries are testing, then all sorts of bans immediately appear ...
    1. vodolaz
      vodolaz 13 October 2015 08: 49 New
      +6
      Only celestials can do anything, the rest are unworthy.
      1. Now we are free
        Now we are free 13 October 2015 09: 06 New
        11
        Everyone does Gesheft in the war with ISIS ...
        1). Syria continues to live without fear that it will be beheaded or burned alive.
        2). Turkey, under the guise of bombing Kurds + buys oil from ISIS + Raises its price to the United States and Co. (say you want us to train and supply ISIS? Then pay or give us carte blanche for bombing the Kurds in Syria and Northern Iraq, for example)
        3). Iran got out of sanctions and busily noticing no one is developing its missile program + trying to spread its influence in Syria (the IRGC is not for-thanks! It’s fighting ...).
        4). Flirting with Moscow and gaining new Russian weapons, Turkey, like Turkey, raises its price to the strange occupier of the United States + Thanks to the presence in the conflict with ISIS, such allies as Iran and the Russian Federation have the opportunity to survive (which was not provided for by the US plans).
        5). Израиль ест попкорн и смотрит прекрасный для себя сериал Шииты vs Суниты +Получил скорее всего от Москвы гарантии, что "Высокоточка" не попадёт в руки Хэзболлы и возможно гарантии того, что "Голаны" а (возможно и не только) останутся таки за Израилем, когда закончится весь шухер...
        6). Россия выбила для себя военно-морскую базу в Тартусе и базу ВВС в Латакии и что то мне говорит что эти базы отнюдь не последние... +Рекламирует Online своё вооружение в формате Full HD (как когда то Американцы и Ко в далёком 1991 году) +Имеет прямую возможность воздействовать на рост цен на нефть (Это ВКС РФ ещё нефтяные скважины ИГИЛ ещё не бомбили...) +Уничтожает слетевшихся как мухи на г... террористов -фундаменталистов вне своей территории. +Выступает в роли миротворца защищающего мир от ИГИЛа, который до этого так усердно раскручивали США (в пику Американской программе "Управляемого хаоса") словно США подготовили ИГИЛ к брачной ночи с собой любимыми а первым в постель перед США влез Путин и закрыл перед недоумевающими штатами дверь в спальню (мол спасибо, что подготовил девушку Обама, но "Жарить я её буду один) а ты иди пока поанонируй покричи какие мы плохие в своём НАТОвском гареме.
        6). Китай оказывая молчаливую поддержку России старается ослабить США и её свору не вступая с ними в открытое противостояние +Одобрительно кивает утилизации своих "тревожных Уйгуров" в Сирии +С аппетитом поглядывает на углеводороды Сирии +Лелеет план "Нового шёлкового пути": Китай-Иран-Россия-ЕС в противовес Американскому закручиванию гаек и попыткам экономически ослабить Китай.

        Единственное не знаю какой гешефт получают: США, СА и Катар. Хотя возможно они и оплачивают "Сирийскую вечеринку". wassat

        PS This music will be eternal ...
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. Zoldat_A
      Zoldat_A 13 October 2015 08: 54 New
      +1
      Quote: Dreiko11
      as the Americans are testing something, this is for defense purposes, as other countries are testing, then all sorts of bans immediately appear ...

      Moreover, America generally somehow drools over the presence or absence of resolutions of a UN, when it makes some decisions ...

      The American principle is Quod licet Jovi non licet bovi (lat. “What is permitted to Jupiter is not allowed to a bull”). Так вы, господа "исключительные", уже определитесь - либо мы живём по международному праву, либо бомбим кого хотим, оружием снабжаем того, кого хотим и оранжевые революции делаем где хотим...
  2. VseDoFeNi
    VseDoFeNi 13 October 2015 08: 40 New
    +7
    Only the hegemon and NATO have the right to violate UN resolutions !!! How dare ??? laughing
    1. Simon
      Simon 13 October 2015 08: 51 New
      0
      Correctly! Let’s better watch themselves, they violate any UN resolutions more. Though in Syria, even in Europe.
  3. GRAY
    GRAY 13 October 2015 08: 42 New
    +4
    Since a nuclear agreement has been concluded, it means the missile cannot be used to deliver a nuclear warhead smile and does not fall under UN resolution. Run more.
  4. ssn18
    ssn18 13 October 2015 08: 43 New
    +5
    Все как в старой армейской поговорке: "Существует два мнения. Одно - мое, второе - не правильное"
  5. rf xnumx
    rf xnumx 13 October 2015 08: 46 New
    +3
    US official: Iranian test of a ballistic missile violates UN resolution
    They do not like it, count better how many bloodsuckers you violated
  6. MIKHALYCH1
    MIKHALYCH1 13 October 2015 08: 47 New
    +2
    Well, staff members ... As soon as something is not by their decree, the UN immediately remembers! And the Iranians fellows work slowly ...
  7. vovanpain
    vovanpain 13 October 2015 08: 47 New
    11
    The Americans themselves do not know what they want, then the launch does not contradict, it violates the resolution. One word is unwise people ... b
  8. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 13 October 2015 08: 52 New
    +3
    Whatever Iran does, the United States will not like it. Therefore, the reaction of the Americans is predictable, but for Iran it is not an instruction for immediate execution. Which is absolutely correct.
    1. Buffalo
      Buffalo 13 October 2015 11: 24 New
      +1
      Marked for sure!
      US reaction to Iran:
      "Ты виноват лишь тем, что хочется мне кушать...."
  9. Zoriz
    Zoriz 13 October 2015 09: 16 New
    +2
    The existence of America in itself already violates ALL UN resolutions, the laws of world equilibrium, international law and the logic of common sense.
  10. Old26
    Old26 13 October 2015 09: 16 New
    0
    In fact, both resolutions relate primarily to Iran’s nuclear program. In resolution 1929 there is only one clause related to ballistic missiles (Clause 9), and even then, this clause mainly concerns not the transfer of technology and the testing of such missiles in Iran
  11. afrikanez
    afrikanez 13 October 2015 09: 21 New
    +2
    Does the United States itself implement many UN resolutions? angry
    1. Gormenghast
      Gormenghast 13 October 2015 09: 37 New
      0
      Yeah; especially resolutions on lifting illegal sanctions from Cuba, which were adopted by the UN General Assembly almost unanimously (except for the United States naturally) laughing

      About 22 resolutions.
  12. mpzss
    mpzss 13 October 2015 09: 31 New
    0
    I think this: no one has the right to tell the state how to develop! it's like having sex in the square!
  13. mvg
    mvg 13 October 2015 09: 38 New
    -1
    Well, not so good. Russia has drawn itself into a war in which there is no military solution. Having made significant concessions, I think both before the Jews and before the SA and China. At the same time, she turned against herself Sunnis - most Arabs ..
    Iran, maybe militarily, which is what it represents and has undoubted influence, but I strongly doubt that in the economy (oil reserves) and militarily it will be able to confront its opponents (Qatar, SA and Israel). Also an eternal confrontation.
    США, может и удивились, что не "последняя затычка" в любом конфликте, несомненно, не последний участник в оной. Все так же контролирует СА, Ирак, Ебипет и др. Уверен, что имеет пару козырей в рукаве.
    Turkey in chocolate, smashes the Kurds with impunity, has cheap oil and Western support. Attention to Syria, turns a blind eye to their own problems (the same Kurds). Will never allow the creation of a Kurdish state.
    I don’t understand the benefits of Russia? Assad will not be anyway, either they will kill, or they will be replaced by a Sunni ... and Khan bases. There is almost no oil in Syria, what is explored under the Gollan is garbage, Israel will not give them back. There will still be a transit, it cannot but be ... The SA and Qatar will not allow it to be absent. Well, it will raise the country's prestige, test and show its armament in a promising market ... But this is pulling into conflict for years .. and this is not Afghanistan .. Is the game worth the candle? I really want the GDP to have a plan and a couple of jokers.
    The opinion of the amateur who is following the conflict ...
  14. pvv113
    pvv113 13 October 2015 09: 49 New
    +1
    US official: Iranian test of a ballistic missile violates UN resolution

    A miracle happened - mattresses remembered about the UN !!!
  15. Buffalo
    Buffalo 13 October 2015 11: 21 New
    +1
    Israel also created its weapons in defiance of the Treaty on its Non-Proliferation.
    Today, Israel, the possessor of nuclear weapons, openly threatens Iran with war.
    Why is Iran worse? The fact that Israel and the US do not like him?
  16. Old26
    Old26 13 October 2015 11: 39 New
    0
    Quote: afrikanez
    Does the United States itself implement many UN resolutions?

    Каких резолюций ООН? Совета безопасности или Генассамблеи? Первые имеют обязательность к применение. Вторые - это "протокол о намерениях". Там не действует ВЕТО, но и применение необязательно...
  17. Region 23
    Region 23 13 October 2015 20: 25 New
    0
    Abbas Arakchi, Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister for Legal and International Affairs, stressed that under no circumstances would the Islamic Republic of Iran consult with foreign countries on issues of national security and the defense industry.
    “The test of the latest Emad ballistic missile in Iran does not violate the Joint Comprehensive Action Plan (JCPC) for the Iranian nuclear program,” Arakchi explained as part of the events marking the 70th anniversary of the United Nations.
    According to the deputy foreign minister of Iran, resolution 2231, adopted by the UN Security Council, annulled 6 previous resolutions regarding Iran. At the same time, the implementation of the JCPOA will cause a fundamental change in relations between Iran and the UN Security Council.
    http://www.iran.ru/news/politics/98818/MID_IRI_ispytanie_raket_ne_protivorechit_
    SKPD