US official: Iranian test of a ballistic missile violates UN resolution

Iran’s recent ballistic missile test contradicts UN Security Council resolution number 1929, CNN reported, citing a US administration official.

RIA News recalls that on Sunday the Iranian media reported on the successful testing of a ballistic missile. Information was shared with the press by Defense Minister Hossein Dehgan.

As the source said, “if based on information from open sources, the test is a violation of the UN Security Council resolution 1929, which stipulates that Iran cannot participate in any activities related to ballistic missiles.”

At the same time, he stressed that the test launch “does not contradict the nuclear agreement reached in July between Iran and the six countries, since the agreement will focus on limiting access to nuclear arms».

According to him, there is another resolution of the UN Security Council - the 2231 number - on reaching this agreement and "banning Iran from taking part in events related to ballistic missiles designed to deliver nuclear warheads." However, this resolution has not yet entered into force.

Comments

[Dreiko11]

as the Americans are testing something, this is for defense purposes, as other countries are testing, then all sorts of bans immediately appear ...

[vodolaz]

Only celestials can do anything, the rest are unworthy.

[Now we are free]

Everyone does Gesheft in the war with ISIS ...
1). Syria continues to live without fear that it will be beheaded or burned alive.
2). Turkey, under the guise of bombing Kurds + buys oil from ISIS + Raises its price to the United States and Co. (say you want us to train and supply ISIS? Then pay or give us carte blanche for bombing the Kurds in Syria and Northern Iraq, for example)
3). Iran got out of sanctions and busily noticing no one is developing its missile program + trying to spread its influence in Syria (the IRGC is not for-thanks! It’s fighting ...).
4). Flirting with Moscow and gaining new Russian weapons, Turkey, like Turkey, raises its price to the strange occupier of the United States + Thanks to the presence in the conflict with ISIS, such allies as Iran and the Russian Federation have the opportunity to survive (which was not provided for by the US plans).
five). Israel is eating popcorn and watching a wonderful series of Shiites vs Sunites + Most likely I received guarantees from Moscow that Vysokotochka will not fall into the hands of Hezbollah and possibly guarantees that the Golan and (perhaps not only) will remain with Israel. when all the nix is ​​over ...
6). Russia knocked out for itself a naval base in Tartus and an air force base in Latakia, and something tells me that these bases are by no means the last ... + Online advertises its weapons in Full HD format (like the Americans and Co. did back in 1991) + Has a direct opportunity to influence the rise in oil prices (This is the RF Aerospace Forces have not yet bombed the ISIS oil wells ...) + Destroys the fundamentalist terrorists who have flown like flies to the city ... outside its territory. + Acts as a peacemaker protecting the world from ISIS, which the United States had previously so diligently promoted (in spite of the American program of "Controlled Chaos") as if the United States had prepared ISIS for their wedding night with their loved ones and Putin was the first to get into bed in front of the United States and shut it in front of bewildered states the door to the bedroom (they say thank you for preparing the girl Obama, but "I will fry her alone) and you go and cannonize and shout how bad we are in our NATO harem."
6). China, providing tacit support to Russia, is trying to weaken the United States and its pack without entering into open confrontation with them + Nods approvingly to the disposal of its "alarming Uyghurs" in Syria + Looks with appetite at Syria's hydrocarbons + Cherishes the "New Silk Road" plan: China-Iran-Russia -EU versus American tightening of the nuts and attempts to weaken China economically.

The only thing I do not know is what kind of gesheft they get: the USA, CA and Qatar. Although they may be paying for the "Syrian Party".

PS This music will be eternal ...

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: Dreiko11

as the Americans are testing something, this is for defense purposes, as other countries are testing, then all sorts of bans immediately appear ...

Moreover, America generally somehow drools over the presence or absence of resolutions of a UN, when it makes some decisions ...

The American principle is Quod licet Jovi non licet bovi (lat. “What is permitted to Jupiter is not allowed to a bull”). So you, gentlemen, "exceptional", have already decided - either we live according to international law, or we bomb whoever we want, we supply whoever we want with weapons and we do orange revolutions wherever we want ...

[VseDoFeNi]

Only the hegemon and NATO have the right to violate UN resolutions !!! How dare ???

[Simon]

Correctly! Let’s better watch themselves, they violate any UN resolutions more. Though in Syria, even in Europe.

[GRAY]

Since a nuclear agreement has been concluded, it means the missile cannot be used to deliver a nuclear warhead and does not fall under UN resolution. Run more.

[ssn18]

Everything is like the old army saying: "There are two opinions. One is mine, the second is not correct."

[rf xnumx]

US official: Iranian test of a ballistic missile violates UN resolution

They do not like it, count better how many bloodsuckers you violated

[MIKHALYCH1]

Well, staff members ... As soon as something is not by their decree, the UN immediately remembers! And the Iranians fellows work slowly ...

[vovanpain]

The Americans themselves do not know what they want, then the launch does not contradict, it violates the resolution. One word is unwise people ... b

[rotmistr60]

Whatever Iran does, the United States will not like it. Therefore, the reaction of the Americans is predictable, but for Iran it is not an instruction for immediate execution. Which is absolutely correct.

[Buffalo]

Marked for sure!
US reaction to Iran:
"Your only fault is that I want to eat ...."

[Zoriz]

The existence of America in itself already violates ALL UN resolutions, the laws of world equilibrium, international law and the logic of common sense.

[Old26]

In fact, both resolutions relate primarily to Iran’s nuclear program. In resolution 1929 there is only one clause related to ballistic missiles (Clause 9), and even then, this clause mainly concerns not the transfer of technology and the testing of such missiles in Iran

[afrikanez]

Does the United States itself implement many UN resolutions?

[Gormenghast]

Yeah; especially resolutions on lifting illegal sanctions from Cuba, which were adopted by the UN General Assembly almost unanimously (except for the United States naturally)

About 22 resolutions.

[mpzss]

I think this: no one has the right to tell the state how to develop! it's like having sex in the square!

[mvg]

Well, not so good. Russia has drawn itself into a war in which there is no military solution. Having made significant concessions, I think both before the Jews and before the SA and China. At the same time, she turned against herself Sunnis - most Arabs ..
Iran, maybe militarily, which is what it represents and has undoubted influence, but I strongly doubt that in the economy (oil reserves) and militarily it will be able to confront its opponents (Qatar, SA and Israel). Also an eternal confrontation.
The United States may have been surprised that not the "last plug" in any conflict, undoubtedly, is not the last participant in it. All the same controls the SA, Iraq, Ebipet and others. I am sure that he has a couple of trump cards up his sleeve.
Turkey in chocolate, smashes the Kurds with impunity, has cheap oil and Western support. Attention to Syria, turns a blind eye to their own problems (the same Kurds). Will never allow the creation of a Kurdish state.
I don’t understand the benefits of Russia? Assad will not be anyway, either they will kill, or they will be replaced by a Sunni ... and Khan bases. There is almost no oil in Syria, what is explored under the Gollan is garbage, Israel will not give them back. There will still be a transit, it cannot but be ... The SA and Qatar will not allow it to be absent. Well, it will raise the country's prestige, test and show its armament in a promising market ... But this is pulling into conflict for years .. and this is not Afghanistan .. Is the game worth the candle? I really want the GDP to have a plan and a couple of jokers.
The opinion of the amateur who is following the conflict ...

[pvv113]

US official: Iranian test of a ballistic missile violates UN resolution

A miracle happened - mattresses remembered about the UN !!!

[Buffalo]

Israel also created its weapons in defiance of the Treaty on its Non-Proliferation.
Today, Israel, the possessor of nuclear weapons, openly threatens Iran with war.
Why is Iran worse? The fact that Israel and the US do not like him?

[Old26]

Quote: afrikanez

Does the United States itself implement many UN resolutions?

What UN resolutions? Security Council or General Assembly? The former are binding. The second is a protocol of intent. VETO does not work there, but the application is optional ...

[region 23]

Abbas Arakchi, Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister for Legal and International Affairs, stressed that under no circumstances would the Islamic Republic of Iran consult with foreign countries on issues of national security and the defense industry.
“The test of the latest Emad ballistic missile in Iran does not violate the Joint Comprehensive Action Plan (JCPC) for the Iranian nuclear program,” Arakchi explained as part of the events marking the 70th anniversary of the United Nations.
According to the deputy foreign minister of Iran, resolution 2231, adopted by the UN Security Council, annulled 6 previous resolutions regarding Iran. At the same time, the implementation of the JCPOA will cause a fundamental change in relations between Iran and the UN Security Council.
http://www.iran.ru/news/politics/98818/MID_IRI_ispytanie_raket_ne_protivorechit_
SKPD