Military Review

In February, the Indian fleet will be replenished with a nuclear submarine

51
Indian Navy will adopt the first Arihant submarine of domestic construction in February 2016 g, reports TASS message indian express.




According to a newspaper source, "the submarine sea trials on the high seas were successfully completed earlier, and the last trials will begin in the near future, during which missiles from the Arihant will be launched."

The publication said that “within a month, the first subsonic Indian medium-range cruise missile (up to 1 thousand km) of Nirbhay surface-to-surface class and the first Indian ballistic missile for submarines (with a range of to 700 km) ”.

According to the newspaper, Arihant has a displacement of 6 thousand tons and is capable of underwater speed up to 30 nodes.

The government allocated $ 2,9 billion for the construction of nuclear submarines. According to the Indian Express, the naval command has already received permission to order two regular submarines of the same class. Their number is planned to be brought to 5 units.

Currently, the Indian Navy has one submarine "Nerpa". It was transferred to Russia in 2012 g for rent for 10 years. The Indian boat name is Chakra.

Photos used:
http://bastion-karpenko.ru/
51 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. PlotnikoffDD
    PlotnikoffDD 12 October 2015 18: 08 New
    +3
    Will the missiles be with nuclear warheads or not?
    1. lelikas
      lelikas 12 October 2015 18: 30 New
      +7
      Quote: PlotnikoffDD
      Will the missiles be with nuclear warheads or not?

      "K-15 Sagarika" warheads up to 1 ton.
      1. Kostyar
        Kostyar 12 October 2015 19: 47 New
        -4
        Well, the Indians popped .....
        1. marlin1203
          marlin1203 12 October 2015 20: 57 New
          +4
          2,9 billion Baku rubles! .. belay Well how many "boreev" could you buy? Do you know? And I know - 4 !!! Really such a desire among the Indians to develop their own defense industry. Yes, and the boat turned out "so-so" no
          1. Bersaglieri
            Bersaglieri 12 October 2015 21: 30 New
            +4
            This is the cost of the creation program + the first instance. “Northwind” cost much more.
            Well, in the series, about 400-500 Baku will be, i.e. 2 times cheaper than Severodvinsk or Borea
            1. Russian Uzbek
              Russian Uzbek 12 October 2015 21: 40 New
              +6
              "Arianto" to "Borea" as to the moon ... it's a different level
              1. Bersaglieri
                Bersaglieri 12 October 2015 23: 05 New
                0
                By itself. Arihant is level 671 RTMK
            2. igorka357
              igorka357 13 October 2015 06: 06 New
              +1
              Where does this information come from, eh? I was always amazed at the awareness of some individuals like you!
          2. afdjhbn67
            afdjhbn67 13 October 2015 03: 40 New
            +2
            Quote: marlin1203
            2,9 billion Baku rubles! .. belay Well how many "boreev" could you buy? Do you know? And I know - 4 !!! Really such a desire among the Indians to develop their own defense industry. Yes, and the boat turned out "so-so" no


            And how many jobs? what is the technology step? and there is no one independence? (import substitution)
    2. One, two, on the left.
      One, two, on the left. 12 October 2015 23: 22 New
      +1
      And where did the technology come from? No need to explain the obvious.
      1. Bersaglieri
        Bersaglieri 12 October 2015 23: 35 New
        +1
        Since the first “Chakra" partly (ie Project 670), a little the French suggested, pretty much the USSR / Russia with documentation on 670, 671 and 971
  3. Rurikovich
    Rurikovich 12 October 2015 18: 13 New
    +1
    Maybe 6000t?what
    1. Rader
      Rader 12 October 2015 18: 21 New
      0
      Quote: Rurikovich
      Maybe 6000t?what

      A displacement of 6 tons is a torpedo, not a submarine wassat So yes, they made a mistake on three zeroes laughing
      P.S. Is this underwater or surface displacement indicated?
      1. Voha_krim
        Voha_krim 12 October 2015 21: 24 New
        -1
        Quote: Rader
        Quote: Rurikovich
        Maybe 6000t?what

        A displacement of 6 tons is a torpedo, not a submarine wassat So yes, they made a mistake on three zeroes laughing
        P.S. Is this underwater or surface displacement indicated?

        The article clearly states
        According to the newspaper, Arihant has a displacement of 6 thousand т

        Thousand - it is abbreviated thousand! Is it not clear?
    2. avt
      avt 12 October 2015 18: 32 New
      +2
      Quote: Rurikovich
      Maybe 6000t?

      Yes, but there were 7000
      Quote: Rader
      P.S. Is this underwater or surface displacement indicated?

      They don’t yet know the campaign themselves, but they swim down to the okiyan and find out, well, when they plunge and emerge, if they do not forget to measure. wassat
      Quote: PlotnikoffDD
      Will the missiles be with nuclear warheads or not?

      They want 4 divided into each of the four fit and with a range of well, no less than 3500km. While this is not, what will be put? They don’t know the campaign either - what kind of “Brahmos” or what’s their own “Fire” for 700 kilometers. In general, the main thing for them is that the sailors sailed, and then like Shiva, or Krishna, or Vishna, or Kali, or still someone - they will solve thousands of them. And so, if the boat turned out without golovnyakov - well done. The Brazilians also said that they would build it, but so far it’s silence, and they drew this ticket to the nuclear-powered club - we can see if it will pass.
      1. Rurikovich
        Rurikovich 12 October 2015 18: 50 New
        0
        Ooh, finally fixed ... Already right - "6tys.t" smile
      2. Andrey NM
        Andrey NM 13 October 2015 03: 44 New
        +1
        Based on the data presented here, the missile is slightly better than the product 4K-10, which was adopted by the army in 1968 and was on a submarine of project 667a. And if the guidance system is only inertial with simple dispersion, then everything is clear. Ours had three "heads" and a range of 2500 at maximum. Development of the level of the late 60s. I wonder how the boat itself is in hardware.
        In appearance, I immediately drew an association with "azuha".
    3. igorka357
      igorka357 13 October 2015 06: 08 New
      -1
      It says so, blow up the balls!
      1. Rurikovich
        Rurikovich 13 October 2015 08: 08 New
        +1
        For the gifted - at the time of reading this article and the appearance of the first comment (read the time hi ) the article stated "6t", which subsequently corrected and caused a second comment with this statement!
        Ude has repeatedly noticed that there are inaccuracies in the articles, which are then corrected in the wake of pointing to them!
        And, Dear Igor 357, you would first learn good manners before making any comments wink hi
  4. Armored optimist
    Armored optimist 12 October 2015 18: 14 New
    -6
    They have a vigorous bonba, even if they don’t say it, they will have to keep in mind.
    Life is getting worse. Soon every bandyugan will have something nuclear.
    1. KazaK Bo
      KazaK Bo 12 October 2015 18: 35 New
      -2
      Armored optimist
      They have a vigorous bonba, even if they don’t say it, they will have to keep in mind.

      It’s not a secret to anyone that India has a “VEGETABLE” bomb ... Another secret - for whom are these “vigorous” submarines? ... Indeed, India has very serious disagreements with only two neighbors over separate areas in Tibet and Kashmir ... In the case of a "very hot stage of relations" (God forbid !!!) with these neighbors such ships are unlikely to be needed ... and enough territory ... And "vigorous" boats are needed for a distant enemy ... HERE AND QUESTION (???) - WHO IS IT?
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. arane
        arane 12 October 2015 21: 55 New
        +1
        Quote: KazaK Bo
        Armored optimist
        They have a vigorous bonba, even if they don’t say it, they will have to keep in mind.

        It’s not a secret to anyone that India has a “VEGETABLE” bomb ... Another secret - for whom are these “vigorous” submarines? ... Indeed, India has very serious disagreements with only two neighbors over separate areas in Tibet and Kashmir ... In the case of a "very hot stage of relations" (God forbid !!!) with these neighbors such ships are unlikely to be needed ... and enough territory ... And "vigorous" boats are needed for a distant enemy ... HERE AND QUESTION (???) - WHO IS IT?

        Yes, from whom ...... From the lights of exclusivity, suddenly the Indians, with their castes, decide to democratize
        1. Greenwood
          Greenwood 13 October 2015 06: 46 New
          0
          No, the Indians have a good relationship with them. India’s entire nuclear program is directed against China and Pakistan.
    2. stonks
      stonks 12 October 2015 20: 39 New
      +1
      India and Pakistan have nuclear weapons.
      And if the missiles on the nuclear submarines are with high-explosive warheads, then why should India spend billions on nuclear submarines ?! fellow
  5. lelikas
    lelikas 12 October 2015 18: 19 New
    +6
    “Arihant” (INS Arihant, अरिहन्त, “Destroyer of the Enemies”) - they mock her for a long time, it is clear that the first, but from the ninth year they launched her into the water.
  6. olegglin
    olegglin 12 October 2015 18: 23 New
    0
    Well, maybe scare the Chinese ...
    1. kil 31
      kil 31 12 October 2015 18: 28 New
      +1
      What will China and Pakistan say? what
      1. bulvas
        bulvas 12 October 2015 18: 33 New
        +1
        Quote: Kil 31
        What will China and Pakistan say? what


        China may remain silent, but Pakistan also wants to, only not 6 but 7 tons
        1. kil 31
          kil 31 12 October 2015 19: 25 New
          +1
          Quote: bulvas
          Quote: Kil 31
          What will China and Pakistan say? what


          China may remain silent, but Pakistan also wants to, only not 6 but 7 tons

          Probably will not be silent. No matter how they are opponents. China already has a problem in the water area, the United States, Korea, Japan are crushing there, not counting other small countries. Now also India will seethe screws of the nuclear-powered ship. If the boat shows itself normally, they will begin to do bundles of them. They will find money. So, China is obliged to say something. hi
          1. Boa kaa
            Boa kaa 13 October 2015 00: 08 New
            +1
            Quote: Kil 31
            So, China is obliged to say something.

            The Chinese plan to have 5-6 SSBN pr 094. Americans rated the program at 4 units.
            The new SSBN is an improved version of "Xia" with a reduced noise level, an improved reliability index of nuclear power plants and new REV systems. The Americans believe that this is pr.93 with an embedded missile section.
            The construction of SSBN pr.94 is carried out according to plan. SSBN capable of carrying 12-16 new SLBM "JL-2" with a range of 8000 km. This allows you to hit targets in the United States with SSBN deployed off the coast of China. And when deploying SSBNs to the northeast of the Kuril Islands, 75% of the United States is defeated.
            The 3-speed ballistic missile launcher "JL-2" has a firing range of 8-10 thousand km, can carry from one MHP with a capacity of 1,0 MT to 3 homing balloons with a capacity of 90 kt. Estimated starting weight of more than 20 tons.
            In July 2004, China launched the JL-2 SLBM. The firing range was estimated at 13 thousand km. There were statements of intent to carry BS under the Arctic ice.
            As you can see, this is not 700km of Hindu Arihanta. So the Hindus need to catch up.
          2. igorka357
            igorka357 13 October 2015 06: 13 New
            0
            Do you want to make nuclear submarine packs in batches? Do you live in any world, we don’t rivet them in batches, and the Americans whose Fed doesn’t rivet as well, although the technology has been worked out to the smallest detail ... and you say Indians will rivet batches ... funny to her- to god!
      2. The comment was deleted.
  7. Rader
    Rader 12 October 2015 18: 28 New
    0
    And how many ballistic missiles did they manage to shove into it? And anyway, where are even the brief TTX of this submarine? And it’s only said in the article about 6 tons and 30 knots request
    1. lelikas
      lelikas 12 October 2015 18: 33 New
      +5
      Ship Type SSBN
      Designation of the Arikhant project
      Codification of NATO Arihant class
      Speed ​​(underwater) 24 knots [1] 30 knots [2]
      Ultimate immersion depth 300 m
      Autonomy of swimming 90 days
      100 crew
      Cost ~ 2,9 billion US dollars
      dimensions
      Surface displacement ~ 6000 t
      The greatest length (on KVL) 110 m
      The width of the body naib. 11 m
      Average draft (on design waterline) 9 m
      Power point
      Atomic. 80 MW reactor [2]
      weaponry
      Torpedo
      mine weapons 6x533mm TA
      Missile armament 12 SLBM K-15 Sagarika
      1. avt
        avt 12 October 2015 18: 39 New
        +1
        Quote: lelikas
        Missile armament 12 SLBM K-15 Sagarika

        what like 4 vertical launchers then? Where is 12 from?
        1. Rader
          Rader 12 October 2015 19: 08 New
          +1
          Quote: lelikas
          Ship Type SSBN
          Designation of the Arikhant project
          Codification of NATO Arihant class ...

          So much better! Thank you, but:
          Quote: avt
          Quote: lelikas
          Missile armament 12 SLBM K-15 Sagarika

          what like 4 vertical launchers then? Where is 12 from?

          a similar question, where are 12 stuffed? belay
          1. andron352
            andron352 12 October 2015 19: 33 New
            0
            3 to the mine.
            on Yasen for 4
            1. igorka357
              igorka357 13 October 2015 06: 20 New
              +1
              Come on, tell me how four SLBMs were shoved into mine 885 right away ... how did you overcome the wise guys, do you even learn the mat part before you drive the shit out and disgrace!
        2. igorka357
          igorka357 13 October 2015 06: 16 New
          0
          Eight more rockets from behind on a barge with a crane will be dragged along wink !
  8. evil partisan
    evil partisan 12 October 2015 18: 34 New
    0
    will adopt the first nuclear-powered Arihant submarine
    Oh ... Not good IT ...
  9. awersa
    awersa 12 October 2015 18: 39 New
    +1
    Not so long ago there was news here that the Chinese for diesel packs are building six roofing felts, eight roofing felts ... that's where the legs grow from here)))
  10. roskot
    roskot 12 October 2015 18: 39 New
    +1
    Pakistan certainly will not be silent. Will order too.
  11. Funnels
    Funnels 12 October 2015 18: 44 New
    +5
    They began to build their own, maybe without waiting for the year 2022, “Nerpa” would be returned home. She would be useful to us now.
  12. APASUS
    APASUS 12 October 2015 18: 53 New
    0
    Honestly, I don’t believe in the Indian genius from whom it was interesting to lick. India can’t finish its tank, while the aircraft was being built it became obsolete and now the boat, and even a nuclear reactor
    1. arane
      arane 12 October 2015 22: 00 New
      +1
      Quote: APASUS
      Honestly, I don’t believe in the Indian genius from whom it was interesting to lick. India can’t finish its tank, while the aircraft was being built it became obsolete and now the boat, and even a nuclear reactor

      How licked from whom? They rent our boats atomic .....! And compare with the 667 project
  13. akudr48
    akudr48 12 October 2015 20: 18 New
    -1
    Own rockets
    Own satellites and space stations
    Own nuclear submarine fleet
    Own electronics
    Own software and programming industry
    Own pharmacology and medical industry
    Own aviation and tank industry (beginning of the journey)
    .................................................. ...

    The Indians have done a lot, much remains to be done. It would be right for us to work with them jointly, both under the BRAMOS program, and in aviation (here the brake with the T-50) and in other areas.

    This is India, which is already included in the major league of countries in military - technological terms.

    We will rejoice for a country that has never harmed Russia, is close to Russians, an Aryan country,
    all the more, the arias came to India from present-day Russia ...
    1. Maksus
      Maksus 12 October 2015 23: 41 New
      0
      I would like to clarify a couple of points:
      1. How is India close to Russia?
      2. Does it bother you that our ancestors 70 years ago drove ARIEV into the earth?
      3. The famous songwriter Arkady Ukupnik is not your relative?
    2. igorka357
      igorka357 13 October 2015 06: 24 New
      -2
      Of all the points, only 4 5 6 is possibly more than half Indian, about everything else that is theirs, we can only say in quotation marks! So do not tell the people!
  14. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 12 October 2015 20: 24 New
    +1
    I'm afraid for the Indians. it’s dangerous to sail on a submarine from India.
  15. mmk
    mmk 12 October 2015 20: 46 New
    0
    Interested in the fact of global security in the event of a boat accident, how well they are built in a quality manner, if it is torpedoed. Type radiation and all that. You sit fishing and then the bam pecks, hooked, and there is a bearing with two heads and three tails.
    1. arane
      arane 12 October 2015 22: 02 New
      +3
      Quote: mmk
      Interested in the fact of global security in the event of a boat accident, how well they are built in a quality manner, if it is torpedoed. Type radiation and all that. You sit fishing and then the bam pecks, hooked, and there is a bearing with two heads and three tails.

      This is the best variant! And he’ll take a fishing rod and do something unnatural with the fisherman wassat
  16. sad1940
    sad1940 13 October 2015 00: 02 New
    0
    Quote: Rurikovich
    Maybe 6000t?what

    So you need to read carefully - it says: 6 thousand. t. What is not clear?

    Admins! Where do your comments always disappear?
  17. Foresterer
    Foresterer 13 October 2015 00: 45 New
    -1
    I have long noticed, and it catches the eye, the more beautiful the weapon, the more deadly and tenacious it is. This boat is no different in beauty and elegance. This is me, in passing.
  18. Old26
    Old26 13 October 2015 20: 39 New
    0
    Quote: Bersaglieri
    Well, in the series, about 400-500 Baku will be, i.e. 2 times cheaper

    I don’t think so. The first two boats we have - 23,2 billion rubles, or about 800 million dollars. Subsequent, as they wrote - about 430-433. Plus almost 300 million more for R&D. In any case, in the series the boats will be close for money

    Quote: BoA KAA
    As you can see, this is not 700km of Hindu Arihanta. So the Hindus need to catch up.

    this is only the first step. K-4 mod. 1 with a range of 3500 km has already been tested, K-4 mod. 2 with a range of 5000 km and a K-5 with a range of 6000 km are being developed.

    Quote: arane
    How licked from whom? They rent our boats atomic .....! And compare with the 667 project

    And if we compare our 667A with "George Washington" laughing Well, tell me, why reinvent the wheel when there is a proven boat architecture, proven over the years of operation?

    Quote: andron352
    a similar question, where are 12 stuffed?

    In 4 mines. The caliber of each K-15 is 71 cm. The mines are intended for the future, for K-4 missiles (at least for the Arihant) and possibly for K-5 (in subsequent ones). Of course, 4 launchers are few - not a bad start. our first also had 3 rockets in general