In February, the Indian fleet will be replenished with a nuclear submarine

October 12 2015

Indian Navy will adopt the first Arihant submarine of domestic construction in February 2016 g, reports TASS message indian express.

According to a newspaper source, "the submarine sea trials on the high seas were successfully completed earlier, and the last trials will begin in the near future, during which missiles from the Arihant will be launched."

The publication said that “within a month, the first subsonic Indian medium-range cruise missile (up to 1 thousand km) of Nirbhay surface-to-surface class and the first Indian ballistic missile for submarines (with a range of to 700 km) ”.

According to the newspaper, Arihant has a displacement of 6 thousand tons and is capable of underwater speed up to 30 nodes.

The government allocated $ 2,9 billion for the construction of nuclear submarines. According to the Indian Express, the naval command has already received permission to order two regular submarines of the same class. Their number is planned to be brought to 5 units.

Currently, the Indian Navy has one submarine "Nerpa". It was transferred to Russia in 2012 g for rent for 10 years. The Indian boat name is Chakra.

Photos used:: http://bastion-karpenko.ru/

Military Reviewin Yandex News

Military Reviewin Yandex Zen

The comment was deleted.
PlotnikoffDD 12 October 2015 18: 08
+3

3

0
Will the missiles be with nuclear warheads or not?
1. lelikas 12 October 2015 18: 30
  +7
  
  7
  
  0
  Quote: PlotnikoffDD
  Will the missiles be with nuclear warheads or not?
  
  "K-15 Sagarika" warheads up to 1 ton.
  1. Kostyar 12 October 2015 19: 47
    
    -4
    
    -4
    
    0
    
    Well, the Indians popped .....
    1. marlin1203 12 October 2015 20: 57
      
      +4
      
      4
      
      0
      
      2,9 billion Baku rubles! .. Well how many "Boreys" could you buy? Do you know? And I know - 4 !!! Is it possible that the Indians have such a craving for the development of their own defense industry. And the boat turned out to be "so-so"
      1. Bersaglieri 12 October 2015 21: 30
        
        +4
        
        4
        
        0
        
        This is the cost of the creation program + the first copy. "Boreas" cost much more.
        Well, in the series, there will be about 400-500 Baku liams, i.e. 2 times cheaper than "Severodvinsk" or "Borey"
        
        Russian Uzbek 12 October 2015 21: 40
        
        +6
        
        6
        
        0
        
        "Ariantu" to "Boreas" as to the moon ... it's another level
        
        Bersaglieri 12 October 2015 23: 05
        
        0
        
        0
        
        0
        
        By itself. Arihant is level 671 RTMK
        
        igorka357 13 October 2015 06: 06
        
        +1
        
        1
        
        0
        
        Where does this information come from, eh? I was always amazed at the awareness of some individuals like you!
      2. afdjhbn67 13 October 2015 03: 40
        
        +2
        
        2
        
        0
        
        Quote: marlin1203
        2,9 billion Baku rubles! .. Well how many "Boreys" could you buy? Do you know? And I know - 4 !!! Is it possible that the Indians have such a craving for the development of their own defense industry. And the boat turned out to be "so-so"
        
        And how many jobs? what is the technology step? and there is no one independence? (import substitution)
2. One, two, on the left. 12 October 2015 23: 22
  +1
  
  1
  
  0
  And where did the technology come from? No need to explain the obvious.
  1. Bersaglieri 12 October 2015 23: 35
    
    +1
    
    1
    
    0
    
    From the first "Chakra" partly (ie Project 670), the French suggested a little, pretty much the USSR / Russia with documentation on 670, 671 and 971
Rurikovich 12 October 2015 18: 13
+1

1

0
Maybe 6000t?
1. Rader 12 October 2015 18: 21
  0
  
  0
  
  0
  Quote: Rurikovich
  Maybe 6000t?
  
  A displacement of 6 tons is a torpedo, not a submarine So yes, they made a mistake on three zeroes
  P.S. Is this underwater or surface displacement indicated?
  1. Voha_krim 12 October 2015 21: 24
    
    -1
    
    -1
    
    0
    
    Quote: Rader
    Quote: Rurikovich
    Maybe 6000t?
    
    A displacement of 6 tons is a torpedo, not a submarine So yes, they made a mistake on three zeroes
    P.S. Is this underwater or surface displacement indicated?
    
    The article clearly states
    According to the newspaper, Arihant has a displacement of 6 thousand т
    
    Thousand - it is abbreviated thousand! Is it not clear?
2. avt 12 October 2015 18: 32
  +2
  
  2
  
  0
  Quote: Rurikovich
  Maybe 6000t?
  
  Yes, but there were 7000
  Quote: Rader
  P.S. Is this underwater or surface displacement indicated?
  
  They don’t yet know the campaign themselves, but they swim down to the okiyan and find out, well, when they plunge and emerge, if they do not forget to measure.
  Quote: PlotnikoffDD
  Will the missiles be with nuclear warheads or not?
  
  They want 4 divided into each of the four accommodating and with a range of no less than 3500 km. While this is not the case, what will they put? They also don’t know what kind of “Brahmos”, or some other “Fire” of their own, about 700 kilometers away. someone else - they will solve thousands of them. And so, if the boat turned out to be without fires - well done. The Brazilians also announced that they would build it, but so far there is silence, but they have drawn this ticket to the club of nuclear-powered ships - we'll see if they pass or not.
  1. Rurikovich 12 October 2015 18: 50
    
    0
    
    0
    
    0
    
    Ooh, finally we fixed it ... Already right - "6 thousand tons"
  2. Andrey NM 13 October 2015 03: 44
    
    +1
    
    1
    
    0
    
    Based on the data presented here, the rocket is slightly better than the 4K-10 product, which was put into service in 1968 and was on the Project 667a submarine. And if the guidance system is also only inertial with simple dispersion, then everything is clear. Ours had three "heads" and a range of 2500 at maximum. Development of the level of the late 60s. Interestingly, how the boat itself is "iron".
    In appearance, I immediately drew an association with "azuha".
3. igorka357 13 October 2015 06: 08
  -1
  
  -1
  
  0
  It says so, blow up the balls!
  1. Rurikovich 13 October 2015 08: 08
    
    +1
    
    1
    
    0
    
    For the gifted - at the time of reading this article and the appearance of the first comment (read the time ) "6t" was indicated in the article, which was subsequently corrected and caused a second comment with this statement!
    Ude has repeatedly noticed that there are inaccuracies in the articles, which are then corrected in the wake of pointing to them!
    And, Dear "Igorka357", would first learn good manners, before making comments to someone
Armored optimist 12 October 2015 18: 14
-6

-6

0
They have a vigorous bonba, even if they don’t say it, they will have to keep in mind.
Life is getting worse. Soon every bandyugan will have something nuclear.
1. KazaK Bo 12 October 2015 18: 35
  -2
  
  -2
  
  0
  Armored optimist
  They have a vigorous bonba, even if they don’t say it, they will have to keep in mind.
  
  The fact that India has a "NUCLEAR" bomb is not a secret for anyone ... The secret is different - for whom are these "nuclear" submarines? ... After all, India has very serious disagreements with only two neighbors because of certain regions in Tibet and Kashmir ... In the event of a "very hot stage of relations" (God forbid !!!) with these neighbors, such ships are hardly needed ... and there is enough territory ... And "vigorous" boats are needed for a remote enemy ... THIS IS THE QUESTION (???) - WHO IS IT?
  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. arane 12 October 2015 21: 55
    
    +1
    
    1
    
    0
    
    Quote: KazaK Bo
    Armored optimist
    They have a vigorous bonba, even if they don’t say it, they will have to keep in mind.
    
    The fact that India has a "NUCLEAR" bomb is not a secret for anyone ... The secret is different - for whom are these "nuclear" submarines? ... After all, India has very serious disagreements with only two neighbors because of certain regions in Tibet and Kashmir ... In the event of a "very hot stage of relations" (God forbid !!!) with these neighbors, such ships are hardly needed ... and there is enough territory ... And "vigorous" boats are needed for a remote enemy ... THIS IS THE QUESTION (???) - WHO IS IT?
    
    Yes, from whom ...... From the lights of exclusivity, suddenly the Indians, with their castes, decide to democratize
    1. Greenwood 13 October 2015 06: 46
      
      0
      
      0
      
      0
      
      No, the Indians have a good relationship with them. India’s entire nuclear program is directed against China and Pakistan.
2. stonks 12 October 2015 20: 39
  +1
  
  1
  
  0
  India and Pakistan have nuclear weapons.
  And if the missiles on the nuclear submarines are with high-explosive warheads, then why should India spend billions on nuclear submarines ?!
lelikas 12 October 2015 18: 19
+6

6

0
“Arihant” (INS Arihant, अरिहन्त, “Destroyer of the Enemies”) - they mock her for a long time, it is clear that the first, but from the ninth year they launched her into the water.
olegglin 12 October 2015 18: 23
0

0

0
Well, maybe scare the Chinese ...
1. kil 31 12 October 2015 18: 28
  +1
  
  1
  
  0
  What will China and Pakistan say?
  1. bulvas 12 October 2015 18: 33
    
    +1
    
    1
    
    0
    
    Quote: Kil 31
    What will China and Pakistan say?
    
    China may remain silent, but Pakistan also wants to, only not 6 but 7 tons
    1. kil 31 12 October 2015 19: 25
      
      +1
      
      1
      
      0
      
      Quote: bulvas
      Quote: Kil 31
      What will China and Pakistan say?
      
      China may remain silent, but Pakistan also wants to, only not 6 but 7 tons
      
      Probably will not be silent. No matter how they are opponents. China already has a problem in the water area, the United States, Korea, Japan are crushing there, not counting other small countries. Now also India will seethe screws of the nuclear-powered ship. If the boat shows itself normally, they will begin to do bundles of them. They will find money. So, China is obliged to say something.
      1. Boa kaa 13 October 2015 00: 08
        
        +1
        
        1
        
        0
        
        Quote: keel 31
        So, China is obliged to say something.
        
        The Chinese plan to have 5-6 SSBN pr 094. Americans rated the program at 4 units.
        The new SSBN is an improved version of the "Xia" with a reduced noise level, improved reliability of nuclear power plants and new REV systems. The Americans believe that this is Project 93 with an embedded missile section.
        The construction of the SSBN pr.94 is going according to plan. The SSBN is capable of carrying 12-16 new JL-2 SLBMs with a range of 8000 km. This allows you to hit targets in the United States using SSBNs deployed near the coast of China. And when SSBNs are deployed northeast of the Kuril Islands, 75% of the US territory is defeated.
        The 3-stage SLBM "JL-2" has a firing range of 8-10 thousand km, and can carry from one MRLS with a capacity of 1,0 Mt to 3 MIRVs with a capacity of 90 kt. The estimated starting weight is over 20 tons.
        In July 2004, China launched the JL-2 SLBM. The firing range was estimated at 13 thousand km. There were statements of intentions to carry the BS under the Arctic ice.
        As you can see, this is not 700km of Hindu Arihanta. So the Hindus need to catch up.
      2. igorka357 13 October 2015 06: 13
        
        0
        
        0
        
        0
        
        Do you want to make nuclear submarine packs in batches? Do you live in any world, we don’t rivet them in batches, and the Americans whose Fed doesn’t rivet as well, although the technology has been worked out to the smallest detail ... and you say Indians will rivet batches ... funny to her- to god!
  2. The comment was deleted.
Rader 12 October 2015 18: 28
0

0

0
And how many ballistic missiles did they manage to shove into it? And anyway, where are even the brief TTX of this submarine? And it’s only said in the article about 6 tons and 30 knots
1. lelikas 12 October 2015 18: 33
  +5
  
  5
  
  0
  Ship Type SSBN
  Designation of the Arikhant project
  Codification of NATO Arihant class
  Speed (underwater) 24 knots [1] 30 knots [2]
  Ultimate immersion depth 300 m
  Autonomy of swimming 90 days
  100 crew
  Cost ~ 2,9 billion US dollars
  dimensions
  Surface displacement ~ 6000 t
  The greatest length (on KVL) 110 m
  The width of the body naib. 11 m
  Average draft (on design waterline) 9 m
  Power point
  Atomic. 80 MW reactor [2]
  weaponry
  Torpedo
  mine weapons 6x533mm TA
  Missile armament 12 SLBM K-15 Sagarika
  1. avt 12 October 2015 18: 39
    
    +1
    
    1
    
    0
    
    Quote: lelikas
    Missile armament 12 SLBM K-15 Sagarika
    
    like 4 vertical launchers then? Where is 12 from?
    1. Rader 12 October 2015 19: 08
      
      +1
      
      1
      
      0
      
      Quote: lelikas
      Ship Type SSBN
      Designation of the Arikhant project
      Codification of NATO Arihant class ...
      
      So much better! Thank you, but:
      Quote: avt
      Quote: lelikas
      Missile armament 12 SLBM K-15 Sagarika
      
      like 4 vertical launchers then? Where is 12 from?
      
      a similar question, where are 12 stuffed?
      1. andron352 12 October 2015 19: 33
        
        0
        
        0
        
        0
        
        3 to the mine.
        on Yasen for 4
        
        igorka357 13 October 2015 06: 20
        
        +1
        
        1
        
        0
        
        Come on, tell me how four SLBMs were shoved into mine 885 right away ... how did you overcome the wise guys, do you even learn the mat part before you drive the shit out and disgrace!
    2. igorka357 13 October 2015 06: 16
      
      0
      
      0
      
      0
      
      Eight more rockets from behind on a barge with a crane will be dragged along !
evil partisan 12 October 2015 18: 34
0

0

0
will adopt the first nuclear-powered Arihant submarine
Oh ... Not good IT ...
awersa 12 October 2015 18: 39
+1

1

0
Not so long ago there was news here that the Chinese for diesel packs are building six roofing felts, eight roofing felts ... that's where the legs grow from here)))
roskot 12 October 2015 18: 39
+1

1

0
Pakistan certainly will not be silent. Will order too.
Funnels 12 October 2015 18: 44
+5

5

0
They began to build their own, maybe, without waiting for 2022, "Nerpa" would be returned home. She would be useful to us now.
APASUS 12 October 2015 18: 53
0

0

0
Honestly, I don’t believe in the Indian genius from whom it was interesting to lick. India can’t finish its tank, while the aircraft was being built it became obsolete and now the boat, and even a nuclear reactor
1. arane 12 October 2015 22: 00
  +1
  
  1
  
  0
  Quote: APASUS
  Honestly, I don’t believe in the Indian genius from whom it was interesting to lick. India can’t finish its tank, while the aircraft was being built it became obsolete and now the boat, and even a nuclear reactor
  
  How licked from whom? They rent our boats atomic .....! And compare with the 667 project
akudr48 12 October 2015 20: 18
-1

-1

0
Own rockets
Own satellites and space stations
Own nuclear submarine fleet
Own electronics
Own software and programming industry
Own pharmacology and medical industry
Own aviation and tank industry (beginning of the journey)
.................................................. ...

The Indians have done a lot, much remains to be done. It would be right for us to work with them jointly, both under the BRAMOS program, and in aviation (here the brake with the T-50) and in other areas.

This is India, which is already included in the major league of countries in military - technological terms.

We will rejoice for a country that has never harmed Russia, is close to Russians, an Aryan country,
all the more, the arias came to India from present-day Russia ...
1. Maksus 12 October 2015 23: 41
  0
  
  0
  
  0
  I would like to clarify a couple of points:
  1. How is India close to Russia?
  2. Does it bother you that our ancestors 70 years ago drove ARIEV into the earth?
  3. The famous songwriter Arkady Ukupnik is not your relative?
2. igorka357 13 October 2015 06: 24
  -2
  
  -2
  
  0
  Of all the points, only 4 5 6 is possibly more than half Indian, about everything else that is theirs, we can only say in quotation marks! So do not tell the people!
Zaurbek 12 October 2015 20: 24
+1

1

0
I'm afraid for the Indians. it’s dangerous to sail on a submarine from India.
mmk 12 October 2015 20: 46
0

0

0
Interested in the fact of global security in the event of a boat accident, how well they are built in a quality manner, if it is torpedoed. Type radiation and all that. You sit fishing and then the bam pecks, hooked, and there is a bearing with two heads and three tails.
1. arane 12 October 2015 22: 02
  +3
  
  3
  
  0
  Quote: mmk
  Interested in the fact of global security in the event of a boat accident, how well they are built in a quality manner, if it is torpedoed. Type radiation and all that. You sit fishing and then the bam pecks, hooked, and there is a bearing with two heads and three tails.
  
  This is the best variant! And he’ll take a fishing rod and do something unnatural with the fisherman
sad1940 13 October 2015 00: 02
0

0

0
Quote: Rurikovich
Maybe 6000t?

So you need to read carefully - it says: 6 thousand. t. What is not clear?

Admins! Where do your comments always disappear?
forester 13 October 2015 00: 45
-1

-1

0
I have long noticed, and it catches the eye, the more beautiful the weapon, the more deadly and tenacious it is. This boat is no different in beauty and elegance. This is me, in passing.
Old26 13 October 2015 20: 39
0

0

0
Quote: Bersaglieri
Well, in the series, about 400-500 Baku will be, i.e. 2 times cheaper

I don’t think so. The first two boats we have - 23,2 billion rubles, or about 800 million dollars. Subsequent, as they wrote - about 430-433. Plus almost 300 million more for R&D. In any case, in the series the boats will be close for money

Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
As you can see, this is not 700km of Hindu Arihanta. So the Hindus need to catch up.

this is only the first step. K-4 mod. 1 with a range of 3500 km has already been tested, K-4 mod. 2 with a range of 5000 km and a K-5 with a range of 6000 km are being developed.

Quote: arane
How licked from whom? They rent our boats atomic .....! And compare with the 667 project

And if we also compare our 667A with "George Washington" Well, tell me, why reinvent the wheel when there is a proven boat architecture, proven over the years of operation?

Quote: andron352
a similar question, where are 12 stuffed?

In 4 mines. The caliber of each K-15 is 71 cm. The mines are intended for the future, for K-4 missiles (at least for the Arihant) and possibly for K-5 (in subsequent ones). Of course, 4 launchers are few - not a bad start. our first also had 3 rockets in general