British military attache received a note on publications about the attack on Russian aircraft

The press service of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation reported that the military attache at the British embassy received a note asking for clarification about the publications in the media that the British Air Force pilots were instructed to attack Russian military aircraft in the event of a threat.




“Today, the military attache at the British Embassy in Moscow was invited to the Russian Defense Ministry, where he was handed a note requesting official clarifications on the fact published in the British media referring to high-ranking sources in the Ministry of Defense of this country about allegedly received by pilots of the Royal Air Force Forces of instructions "in case of threat to their lives" to apply against Russian aircraft weapon to defeat ", - leads message RIA "News".

According to the Ministry of Defense, the military attache of Britain said that he had no information on this subject, promising to provide an official response in the near future.
Photos used:
http://globallookpress.com
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Same lech 12 October 2015 06: 39 New
    • 10
    • 0
    +10
    “In case of threat to their lives” use weapons of destruction against Russian planes, ”


    The Anglo-Saxons, as always, launched a test ball in order to find out how the Russians would react.

    KREMLIN reacted quickly .... but it’s not worth it to rush to LONDON for every clarification on every market news ... there is no official communique from there yet.
    1. venaya 12 October 2015 06: 45 New
      • 16
      • 0
      +16
      Quote: The same Lech
      ... until there is an official communique from there.

      It is the official communique that they do not need to publish at all. The traditional task: to gossip, and then according to the reaction, something will burn out. Playing on the nerves, I think so.
      1. Xanna 12 October 2015 09: 12 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        laughing They published the media, and officials will have to puff. Moreover, the answer with a probability of 90% will be that there was nothing like that. And this answer must be made public as much as possible so that it is not inconsequential to realize "freedom of the press" hi
      2. NEXUS 12 October 2015 09: 14 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: venaya
        Playing on the nerves, I think so.

        Putin told Solovyov yesterday about one of the points of use of precision weapons? "WE HAVE A WILL, IF IT IS NECESSARY, TO USE IT!" So this request of our side is more likely to correct the behavior of our pilots in Syria, and not the nerves about stupid statements by the Britons.
    2. Very old 12 October 2015 06: 47 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Remember the "test ball" from Reagan?

      It seems that the naughty Saxons have pubic jokes crawling from drinking establishments to a wide street
    3. Login_Off 12 October 2015 06: 55 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      So we need to write with reference to senior officials that in the event of an attack on our aircraft, they can drop the "extra" ammunition at the Naglosaks Air Base in Iraq.
      1. Weigher 12 October 2015 07: 38 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Russia needs to make a no-fly zone over Syria for the United States and Co.
      2. Dembel77 12 October 2015 07: 50 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        The dissemination of false information with reference to "anonymous sources" in order to create the necessary public opinion or to escalate military hysteria is an integral and integral part of the so-called information wars. I think that we also have specialists of this kind. We will not succumb to deception and respond adequately to provocations. So you are mistaken, gentlemen, imperialists - now it’s our turn to hand over the cards! Fight back if you can! Unless of course you know how to play (which by the way you can not see).
    4. Azitral 12 October 2015 08: 18 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      It does not deserve a reaction, since it is nonsense. Project: ours answer EXACTLY THE SAME indication. This means that every British fighter approaching a strike distance = a danger to life, and THEREFORE, must receive a preventive plunge. After - God forbid! - A downed Russian plane automatically begins an intense, heated conflict in the air.
      So, I think, fake.
    5. Tra-ta-ta 12 October 2015 09: 38 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      but don’t throw yourself at every market news ...
      And I think that you just need to react like this to the "yapping Mosek" so that the service does not seem to be honey ...
    6. kodxnumx 12 October 2015 10: 34 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Correctly, let everyone answer for the words, and if they said A, then let the B. Ostrovites speak!
  2. A1L9E4K9S 12 October 2015 06: 41 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Britain’s military attache stated that he has no information on this,

    Well, yes, well, yes, the sheep is not wine and he doesn’t know anything.
  3. inkass_98 12 October 2015 06: 41 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Ways of departure did not provide, or what? The Britons also need to get someone like Psakushka or Kirby under-admitted - and they look "dashing and silly," and they can "wind up" any question.
  4. moskowit 12 October 2015 06: 41 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Correctly. Our authorities must respond much more quickly and harshly to every unfriendly or deceitful attack against Russia!
    1. Junior, I 12 October 2015 07: 16 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      You can’t cut with hot!
      But you can and need to troll so that they lose their temper and throw out another stupid thing that will cost them trillions of dollars.
  5. morpogr 12 October 2015 06: 43 New
    • 11
    • 0
    +11
    But what a good idea to troll the NATO military for fake publications of their pseudo-media, and the American had to call up heap for verbiage cnn. The West must answer for its freedom of speech.
  6. Russia 12 October 2015 06: 46 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    he has no information on this subject, having promised to provide an official response in the near future.

    Yes, he’s still far from Psaki!
    But striving - it is noticeable. laughing
  7. EvgNik 12 October 2015 06: 47 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    It is told to the west not to get confused, but let them not get confused. In the course of a year they themselves only managed to stir up an anthill.
  8. sl22277 12 October 2015 06: 47 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    If this gentleman does not have “information”, this does not mean that this was not. Rather lies.
    They deliberately escalate the situation, pursuing one goal to somehow harm Russia.
  9. Kos_kalinki9 12 October 2015 06: 48 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Right in the morning and onto the carpet? have you even given a cup of coffee to drink? Well cruel Russians laughing On empty stomach recourse , without breakfast sad and on lyuli wassat
  10. samarin1969 12 October 2015 06: 48 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    And what do the Royal Air Force do there? ...
    1. EvgNik 12 October 2015 06: 53 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: samarin1969
      And what do the Royal Air Force do there?

      Like what? They have there in 62 countries happening ... sorry - there was an anti-terrorist operation against IS. During the whole year.
  11. rotmistr60 12 October 2015 06: 49 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    British military attaché said he has no information on this subject, promising to provide an official response soon.

    In the "near future" - when? To run into Russia and make stuffing in the media, masters, and as an answer to keep, they are oriented towards the future. In the future, maybe Britain will not, because wash off to hell.
  12. Dimsanych 12 October 2015 06: 49 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Yes, they will answer now. And the answer begs the corresponding. If the pilots are threatened with a life threat, they will shoot to kill. What's wrong with that?! This is so obvious. They fly in military vehicles with weapons, not corn, however. We will also act in case of emergency.
    They are pushing the water in the mortar.
    Another thing is that under the threat of life you can understand much, especially in the sky. They took aim - a threat to life ?! Nearby flew - a threat to life? Every combat mission there is a threat to life. What now, start shooting right away? How chicks behave
  13. bronik 12 October 2015 06: 49 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    “In case of threat to their lives” use weapons of destruction against Russian planes ”

    The British pilot became ill with his heart, well, where are the Russian planes.
  14. Mountain shooter 12 October 2015 06: 53 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Nothing, rub off and leave. But generally it’s tough. So was the order or not? Or just brought fresh coke to London?
  15. aszzz888 12 October 2015 06: 55 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Yeah, one more wanted a war with us!
    Something liquid under their nose, and in their pants.
  16. aziatt 12 October 2015 07: 00 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    In words, they are all heroes, and how it comes to business so immediately - I'm not me and not my ass. As they always just bark, idle tricks.
    The dog is asked: Che barking?
    - scare
    - What’s your tail?
    - Smear, so as not to hit.
    Here it is such an Anglo-Saxon mass, from ancient times.
  17. kuz363 12 October 2015 07: 12 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The British have always been enemies of Russia. The Crimean War of 1854, the civil war in the Caspian Sea and the White Sea ... They always strove to pinch off a piece of the pie.
  18. MEHT 12 October 2015 07: 16 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    British military attache received. And on this, it was necessary to put an end to it. laughing
  19. tommy717 12 October 2015 07: 31 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    But as soon as Ashton Carter croaked that our planes would fall in Syria, the Amer helicopter crashed in Afghanistan.
    "According to RIA Novosti, citing Western media, a NATO mission helicopter crashed in the Afghan capital of Kabul, resulting in the deaths of five soldiers and five more injured."
    Here is the mental answer. They say that thoughts are material, and curses come back.
  20. f, hfrjlf, hf 12 October 2015 08: 04 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I do not understand England, what is immortal or what? would have regretted their pilots, had not enough of kings and queens, kindergarten, by golly
  21. Million 12 October 2015 08: 48 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Let the British not attack! The consequences may be sad for them.
  22. TVM - 75 12 October 2015 08: 49 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    This trial ball is only to find the weaknesses of Russia. And our reaction was quite normal and worthy. I think that the arrogant Saxons realized that in the case of provocative actions on their part, they would get on the nose. And this is normal. Now they will calm down and will only bark from the gateway.
  23. olhon 12 October 2015 09: 46 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And in return you can get a lyuley ..
  24. roskot 12 October 2015 11: 31 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Fushington gave the command fas, London answered yes.