British military attache received a note on publications about the attack on Russian aircraft

36
The press service of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation reported that the military attache at the British embassy received a note asking for clarification about the publications in the media that the British Air Force pilots were instructed to attack Russian military aircraft in the event of a threat.



“Today, the military attache at the British Embassy in Moscow was invited to the Russian Defense Ministry, where he was handed a note requesting official clarifications on the fact published in the British media referring to high-ranking sources in the Ministry of Defense of this country about allegedly received by pilots of the Royal Air Force Forces of instructions "in case of threat to their lives" to apply against Russian aircraft weapon to defeat ", - leads message RIA "News".

According to the Ministry of Defense, the military attache of Britain said that he had no information on this subject, promising to provide an official response in the near future.
  • http://globallookpress.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    12 October 2015 06: 39
    “In case of threat to their lives” use weapons of destruction against Russian planes, ”


    The Anglo-Saxons, as always, launched a test ball in order to find out how the Russians would react.

    KREMLIN reacted quickly .... but it’s not worth it to rush to LONDON for every clarification on every market news ... there is no official communique from there yet.
    1. +16
      12 October 2015 06: 45
      Quote: The same Lech
      ... until there is an official communique from there.

      It is the official communique that they do not need to publish at all. The traditional task: to gossip, and then according to the reaction, something will burn out. Playing on the nerves, I think so.
      1. 0
        12 October 2015 09: 12
        laughing Published by the media, and officials will have to take the rap. Moreover, the answer with a 90% probability will be that nothing like that happened. And this answer should be made public as much as possible so that it would be discouraging to realize "freedom of the press" hi
      2. +1
        12 October 2015 09: 14
        Quote: venaya
        Playing on the nerves, I think so.

        How did Putin say yesterday to Solovyov about one of the points of using high-precision weapons? "WE HAVE THE WILL, IF IT IS NECESSARY, TO APPLY IT!" So this request from our side is more likely to correct the behavior of our pilots in Syria, and not nerves about the stupid statements of the Britons.
    2. +3
      12 October 2015 06: 47
      Remember Reagan's trial balloon?

      It seems that the naughty Saxons have pubic jokes crawling from drinking establishments to a wide street
    3. +8
      12 October 2015 06: 55
      So we need to write with reference to high-ranking officials that in the event of an attack on our aircraft, they can drop the "extra" ammunition at the Naglosax airbase in Iraq.
      1. +5
        12 October 2015 07: 38
        Russia needs to make a no-fly zone over Syria for the United States and Co.
      2. +3
        12 October 2015 07: 50
        The dissemination of false information with reference to "anonymous sources" with the aim of creating the desired public opinion or whipping up military hysteria is an integral and integral part of the so-called information wars. I think that we also have such specialists. We will not give in to deception and will respond to provocations with dignity. So you are wrong, gentlemen imperialists - now it's our turn to deal the cards! Fight back if you can! Unless, of course, you know how to play (which by the way is not visible to you).
    4. 0
      12 October 2015 08: 18
      It does not deserve a reaction, since it is nonsense. Project: ours answer EXACTLY THE SAME indication. This means that every British fighter approaching a strike distance = a danger to life, and THEREFORE, must receive a preventive plunge. After - God forbid! - A downed Russian plane automatically begins an intense, heated conflict in the air.
      So, I think, fake.
    5. 0
      12 October 2015 09: 38
      but don’t throw yourself at every market news ...
      And I think that it is just necessary to react like this to the "yapping of mosek", so that the service does not seem like honey ...
    6. +1
      12 October 2015 10: 34
      Correctly, let everyone answer for the words, and if they said A, then let the B. Ostrovites speak!
  2. +4
    12 October 2015 06: 41
    Britain’s military attache stated that he has no information on this,

    Well, yes, well, yes, the sheep is not wine and he doesn’t know anything.
  3. +3
    12 October 2015 06: 41
    Didn't you foresee any escape routes? Britts also need to get themselves someone like Psakushka or under-admiral Kirby - and they look "dashing and silly", and they can "wind up" any question.
  4. +4
    12 October 2015 06: 41
    Correctly. Our authorities must respond much more quickly and harshly to every unfriendly or deceitful attack against Russia!
    1. +2
      12 October 2015 07: 16
      You can’t cut with hot!
      But you can and need to troll so that they lose their temper and throw out another stupid thing that will cost them trillions of dollars.
  5. +11
    12 October 2015 06: 43
    But what a good idea to troll the NATO military for fake publications of their pseudo-media, and the American had to call up heap for verbiage cnn. The West must answer for its freedom of speech.
  6. +3
    12 October 2015 06: 46
    he has no information on this subject, having promised to provide an official response in the near future.

    Yes, he’s still far from Psaki!
    But striving - it is noticeable. laughing
  7. +2
    12 October 2015 06: 47
    It is told to the west not to get confused, but let them not get confused. In the course of a year they themselves only managed to stir up an anthill.
  8. +4
    12 October 2015 06: 47
    If this gentleman does not have "information", it does not mean that this was not. Rather lies.
    They deliberately escalate the situation, pursuing one goal to somehow harm Russia.
  9. +2
    12 October 2015 06: 48
    Right in the morning and onto the carpet? have you even given a cup of coffee to drink? Well cruel Russians laughing On empty stomach recourse , without breakfast sad and on lyuli wassat
  10. +2
    12 October 2015 06: 48
    And what do the Royal Air Force do there? ...
    1. +2
      12 October 2015 06: 53
      Quote: samarin1969
      And what do the Royal Air Force do there?

      Like what? They have there in 62 countries happening ... sorry - there was an anti-terrorist operation against IS. During the whole year.
  11. +1
    12 October 2015 06: 49
    British military attaché said he has no information on this subject, promising to provide an official response soon.

    In the "near future" - this is when? To run into Russia and make stuffing in the media masters, and how to keep the answer, so they focus on the future. In the future, there may not be Britain either. will wash away to hell.
  12. +3
    12 October 2015 06: 49
    Yes, they will answer now. And the answer begs the corresponding. If the pilots are threatened with a life threat, they will shoot to kill. What's wrong with that?! This is so obvious. They fly in military vehicles with weapons, not corn, however. We will also act in case of emergency.
    They are pushing the water in the mortar.
    Another thing is that under the threat of life you can understand much, especially in the sky. They took aim - a threat to life ?! Nearby flew - a threat to life? Every combat mission there is a threat to life. What now, start shooting right away? How chicks behave
  13. +1
    12 October 2015 06: 49
    “In case of threat to their lives” use weapons of destruction against Russian planes ”

    The British pilot became ill with his heart, well, where are the Russian planes.
  14. +2
    12 October 2015 06: 53
    Nothing, rub off and leave. But generally it’s tough. So was the order or not? Or just brought fresh coke to London?
  15. +1
    12 October 2015 06: 55
    Yeah, one more wanted a war with us!
    Something liquid under their nose, and in their pants.
  16. +5
    12 October 2015 07: 00
    In words, they are all heroes, and how it comes to business so immediately - I'm not me and not my ass. As they always just bark, idle tricks.
    The dog is asked: Che barking?
    - scare
    - What’s your tail?
    - Smear, so as not to hit.
    Here it is such an Anglo-Saxon mass, from ancient times.
  17. +1
    12 October 2015 07: 12
    The British have always been enemies of Russia. The Crimean War of 1854, the civil war in the Caspian Sea and the White Sea ... They always strove to pinch off a piece of the pie.
  18. +1
    12 October 2015 07: 16
    British military attache received. And on this, it was necessary to put an end to it. laughing
  19. +2
    12 October 2015 07: 31
    But as soon as Ashton Carter croaked that our planes would fall in Syria, the Amer helicopter crashed in Afghanistan.
    "As reported by RIA Novosti, citing Western media, a NATO mission helicopter crashed in the Afghan capital of Kabul, as a result of the emergency, five servicemen were killed and five more were injured."
    Here is the mental answer. They say that thoughts are material, and curses come back.
  20. 0
    12 October 2015 08: 04
    I do not understand England, what is immortal or what? would have regretted their pilots, had not enough of kings and queens, kindergarten, by golly
  21. 0
    12 October 2015 08: 48
    Let the British not attack! The consequences may be sad for them.
  22. 0
    12 October 2015 08: 49
    This trial ball is only to find the weaknesses of Russia. And our reaction was quite normal and worthy. I think that the arrogant Saxons realized that in the case of provocative actions on their part, they would get on the nose. And this is normal. Now they will calm down and will only bark from the gateway.
  23. 0
    12 October 2015 09: 46
    And in return you can get a lyuley ..
  24. 0
    12 October 2015 11: 31
    Fushington gave the command fas, London answered yes.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"