Three whales of Russian statehood

Russian statehood, the strength of our country, rests on three pillars - ideology, military power, and economy.


That in the time of Russia, that under Ivan the Terrible, that under the Romanovs, that under the USSR, that now the ideology is essentially the same. We are constantly collecting land lost under the rule of either narrow-minded people or outright traitors. In the territory under control, under different flags and in different ways, they tried to build a strong state, a just society. We are special, we are different, we are a separate unique civilization. "Moscow is the third Rome, the fourth is not to be," and the point. When this was forgotten, troubles and revolutions began, we lost land and population in order to start everything from the beginning.

Great historical year - the cycle of Russia lasts for decades and centuries. When we are weak, fragmented and weak-willed, this is February and -30 ° C. Wait, everything will change soon, because Russia is the best example of the law of thermal expansion, and winter is not eternal.

And now we have spring, Russian spring. Of course, with frost, with gusts of thorny westerly wind, with thunderclouds somewhere in the south, with magnetic storms on our southwestern outskirts. But all this on the scale of our history is only an eructation of winter, which is not able to restrain the tread of the Russian spring.

The military power of our country has repeatedly baffled many, ranging from ancient foreign wise men to American supercomputers. Steppe nomads, crusaders, Carls, Napoleons, and Hitlers noted reckless courage and boldness, fatalism, the amazing resilience of the Russian soldier.

My father is sure that the whole thing is in Orthodoxy and its influence on our mentality. I do not argue with him, but I am sure that the matter is also in our not very gentle climate, since in the history did not notice a single case of serious military defeats from aggressors living in milder weather conditions and at a comparable level of science and technology. Only the Mongols at one time inflicted a total defeat on our ancestors, since they came from such an ass of the world that even our severe frosts did not impress the invaders.

Our “fight” whale never failed Russia, and if the other two were just as “cool”, the map of the country would include the entire planet with its surroundings. And we usually endure military defeats from ourselves, during unrest and internal strife, when the “ideological whale” once again picks up some measure or as a result of trivial treachery.

Our economy is always lagging behind, and always catching up with someone. Many say that Russia has always lived through the export of raw materials. Previously, it was hemp and flax, now oil and gas. Let anyone else try to convince others that the presence of natural resources is bad, for such a “divorce” only under Yeltsin could have been told. Another thing is that whenever we, using our own resources, open spaces and a talented population, try to qualitatively transform our country, we apparently become quite vulnerable. Enemies are attacking ideology, which leads to confusion, or military invasion, which INEVITABLY ends with the need to feed and rebuild the invaders. So that's a cunning plan.

It so happened that 15 years ago, all three whales of our statehood were more like dried vobla (this is exactly the ideology that was sharply blown away, and then the other two), and Russia on such “strong” supports, raking both sides, cheerfully went to the bottom .

Let us not now talk about the role of the individual in history, but we all understand by whom Russia not only did not collapse, but such notions as national pride, greatness of the country, and confidence in the future have returned to our life. Recall, a little earlier, the word "ideology" was almost banned.

The army was revived from non-existence. New weapons and equipment look spectacular and effective. Ossetia, Crimea, Syria ... This toothy whale turned out.

In modern Russia, the “economic kitenish” against the background of its counterparts is clearly too small. Although in our country it was moved from the beginning that a sword was forged first, and then only a plow. It was possible, of course, and vice versa, but the ruins of careless cities, from ancient to Tripoli and Sirte, tell us that we are doing everything correctly.

What does not kill, then makes us stronger. The events of August 2008 only accelerated the development of our army and the military industrial complex. They staged a bloody butt in Ukraine, tried to “stir up” the Maidan in Moscow, cause a split in society, and achieved the opposite — the people fully supported the power. Thanks for waking up.

Now the sanctions ... The West has already done everything to revive the Russian army, patriotism has returned. Now, thanks to the sanctions, we eat for the most part ours, try to build more, not relying on "partners." I hope that the difficult economic situation will force the "collective Chubais" out of high offices, driving decent and smart people there.

Now here is Syria, our drying and dead thugs in the desert ...

Americans are doing everything to glorify our army, our weapons. Over the year with more than their own bombings, they did not advance at all to the DECLARED goals in this country, and in a few days ours caused serious damage to the unofficial US infantry and disrupted the sale of "scorched" oil.

LIH is a favorite brainchild of Western intelligence agencies, and in order to protect this sprout of future chaos already on a global scale, outside they blinded the “shell” of some “moderate” and “opposition” “fighters with the dictator Asad”, and inside the egg itself is an Iblis state.

And here comes the Russian hero and (this arrives), and this egg, forgive, pinches. Squealed most of all from Washington, so it is his. It remains only to stick a needle into the egg, and the skin that wasting over the buck will not survive this. But a needle is not bombs, not rockets, and not "Russian tomahawks" even, but true. The truth is about who created and supports evil, who in the end is evil, and who opposes it.

Successful actions of Russian troops will undoubtedly raise the prestige of Russia all over the world. Particularly cynical comrades may ask that, they say, we have suffered from this prestige, not just once or twice, military losses and exorbitant expenses, but someone else has cut the coupons. I am sure that this operation will at least be repulsed.

Our help to Syria is not only helping an ally, destroying the enemy "in a strange land with little blood", but also a smart advertising campaign of the domestic military-industrial complex. It may well be that the defense industry will become the high-tech engine of our economy that will pull it up.

If our expedition succeeds (and the hysteria of the “partners” just says that we are doing everything correctly), the sanctions policy of the West will look quite awkward. Europe may well need the Syrian experience and the help of Russia already inside the EU borders - the refugees are painfully similar to the invading army. Even if everything is not so dramatic, the next generation of politicians in many European countries will definitely not support the pressure on Russia - the defender, moreover, to their own detriment.

Another caveat: if (when) our military bases, with the full approval of local authorities, stand on the site of the former ISIL, then the KSA and other sheikhs will be much more compliant in the matter of pricing oil and oil products. I think that with the entry of Russia into the war, plans to build "enemy gas pipelines" through the territory of Syria can be safely thrown into the dustbin.

Turkey will also lose its oil from terrorists, and with great enthusiasm it will participate in joint energy projects with Russia. Although while the Turks are filling their price, it may well be that it will be easier to supply gas through the territory of Ukraine’s friendly Ukraine. You know, somehow everything changes too quickly, nothing can be ruled out.

To stop us, NATO terrorists, called "partners," can begin supplying their most modern weapons to ISIS terrorists. For example, with the help of the “attack” on the “capital” of the Iblis state followed by the “unexpected” defeat of the “moderate”. This can make life difficult for the SAA, but not for us.

I am more concerned about the coordinated actions of ISIS and the Americans in Afghanistan. In Central Asia alone aviation you won’t fight back - there is little hope for local armies. In any case, this is a common problem of Moscow, Tehran and Beijing, and we are destined to solve it together. Surely there are similar agreements between the security forces of the three countries, because the "move by Afghanistan" among our enemies was easy to read and there was a solution to the problem.

Finally, one question: what will Russia do if the Black Sea straits overlap Turkey? Under any pretext, under the pressure of "senior comrade." NATO countries wanted to spit on any treaties, there was no supply of ammunition, equipment, personnel, etc., and everything, the mission failed.

Turkey and its president are painfully nervous about our actions in Syria - to see, a lot of things are losing. I’m not at all surprised if Erdogan takes such a step. Then either goodbye Syria, or "carry out a package of measures to rename Istanbul back to Constantinople." Both options have nowhere worse, because they mean a big war, but, I hope, the strength of our VKS and the Caspian flotilla showed the severity of the situation even to the most dull.

The battle for Syria will be long and difficult. In the event of a defeat, our "sovereign whales" will again be blown away, all three, and the discussion of the physical survival of Russia is already under way, but victory opens up brilliant prospects in politics, economics, and security. Only now the Syrians feel sorry, they hardly dreamed of arranging a fight ring from their country for the world heavyweights, they are not Ukrainians.
Author:
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

47 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. venaya 13 October 2015 05: 53 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    That in the time of Russia, that under Ivan the Terrible, that under the Romanovs, that under the USSR, that now the ideology is essentially the same. We constantly collect land lost during the reign of either narrow-minded people or outright traitors.

    "We are constantly collecting land"- Oh my God, my favorite national occupation. Before you collect, first of all, you need to find out what exactly you have scattered, so to speak -“ announce the entire list. " necessary, but how, tell me.
    1. BMW
      BMW 13 October 2015 06: 41 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      It is written beautifully, but slurred.
      And more:
      It may well be that the defense industry will become that high-tech locomotive of our economy that will pull it up.

      Under the USSR, it did not stretch, and now it will not help. Skewing leads to disability.
      confidence in the future.

      Oh, some questions, but no answers.
      Quote: venaya
      Recall, a little earlier, the word "ideology" was almost banned.

      As nebylo, no. And building a country on brotherhood and truth is a slogan, not an ideology. Which is refuted by the actions of the authorities.
      1. venaya 13 October 2015 07: 01 New
        • -1
        • 0
        -1
        Something I really didn’t understand you, somehow it was presented unintelligibly, we look:
        Quote: bmw
        It is written beautifully, but slurred.
        It may well be that the defense industry will become that high-tech locomotive of our economy that will pull it up.
        Under the USSR, it did not stretch, and now it will not help. Skewing leads to disability.
        confidence in the future.
        Oh, some questions, but no answers.
        Quote: venaya
        Recall, a little earlier, the word "ideology" was almost banned.

        As nebylo, no. And building a country on brotherhood and truth is a slogan, not an ideology. Which is refuted by the actions of the authorities.

        See: "that the defense industry will become that high-tech locomotive of our economy that will pull it up"- what do you disagree with here? After all, this is the abukah of the economy. Is it possible to base the economy on non-renewable energy resources? This is only a help, but not a prospect. So it was in the 30s and after the war, do you really disagree? Sorry, you thoroughly confused me.
        As for ideology, it’s even more complicated: ideology of patriotism, here is the foundation, in which particular embodiment, these nuances are not always fundamental, that is, secondary.
        1. BMW
          BMW 13 October 2015 08: 01 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: venaya
          : “that the defense industry will become that high-tech locomotive of our economy that will pull it up” - what do you disagree with here?

          The economy should be balanced, industries should develop evenly. Let us recall the USSR, when other branches were brought in to please the defense industry. Look at China, first they lifted light industry, then they lifted heavy and electronics with information. technology. But this is also a warp. And in our country, the textile industry is almost dead, and how will the defense industry take it up or the production of final fish products? It all comes down to two branches of defense industry and raw materials. Where is heavy engineering or civil aviation? All industries should profit from the final cost of the final product, i.e. maximize value added. Do we have this?
          Quote: venaya
          , in which particular embodiment, these nuances are not always fundamental, that is, secondary.

          Well you give !!!! In the third Reich, patriotism just went through the roof, but what about the implementation option?
          1. venaya 13 October 2015 10: 52 New
            • -2
            • 0
            -2
            Quote: bmw
            ... Well, you give !!!! In the third Reich, patriotism just went through the roof, but what about the implementation option?

            I’ll start from the end: patriotism in Germany was purely Nazi, alluvial, of foreign origin, even their leader until the 28th year had Austrian citizenship (from this year preparations began for a new World War). Indeed, even the name of the capital of the country, used to be the capital of Prussia (formerly Porussia), Berlin had a purely Russian origin.
            But about the economy: examples of other states, although instructive, are not always feasible. China began its takeoff after the visit of US President R. Reagan in the 70s. The Chinese economy has developed through direct investments from the United States, to create opposition to the USSR, in the economic and future military field. Relations between the USSR and China, at that time, were more than strained, it almost went to war. So the example of China itself is so-so. Nobody will help us now, they will only push us. How many? Unknown What you write has a foundation, but the methods for getting out of this are different. Without the introduction of breakthrough technologies, this is impossible, but no one will give us breakthrough technologies without their own defense industry, this is not permissible for them. Everything will have to be done by ourselves, naturally not forgetting the civilian sector, based on breakthrough, high-tech defense industry technologies. This is the case in the USA itself.
            1. BMW
              BMW 13 October 2015 11: 20 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: venaya
              . Without the introduction of breakthrough technologies, this is impossible, but no one will give us breakthrough technologies without their own defense industry, this is not permissible for them. Everything will have to be done by ourselves, naturally not forgetting the civilian sector, based on breakthrough, high-tech defense industry technologies

              All this is clear and correct. Only industry in complete stagnation, where will we apply them? For their implementation, a base is needed, but it actually is not. Just a feeling that all achievements are simply buried, and tightly. The same GLONAS how many years they crawl, and the cart is almost in place. Why does applied computer science stall, because we are not inferior to the others, one example is Kaspersky. Why does the microelectronic base stall? Examples of the sea.
            2. sa-ag 13 October 2015 11: 27 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: venaya
              Without the introduction of breakthrough technologies, this is impossible, but no one will give us breakthrough technologies without their own defense industry, this is not permissible for them. Everything will have to be done by ourselves, naturally not forgetting the civilian sector, based on breakthrough, high-tech defense industry technologies. This is the case in the USA itself.

              Well, there is an example using new technologies made by PAK FA, it will help to build a regional civilian airliner, or the case with Armata, that with the help of those technologies they will build an inexpensive mass tractor for agriculture? No, they will not build it because the military-industrial complex in both the USSR and the Russian Federation is not a locomotive of the economy, but only an expensive article, everything is very expensive and secret there, it’s in the USA, a middle-class country, a bunch of all sorts of new products, if they are not secret they try to put on the market, that the same example with Velcro, it's space development
          2. Vladimir 1964 13 October 2015 13: 29 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: bmw
            The economy must be balanced,

            Quote: bmw
            Well you give !!!! In the third Reich, patriotism just went through the roof, but what about the implementation option?


            Michael, I liked your comment. hi
      2. lelikas 13 October 2015 11: 52 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Here are a few more whales -
        MOSCOW, October 12. / TASS /. The seventh strategic nuclear submarine of the Borey type will receive the name "Emperor Alexander III", the corresponding order has already been signed, a source at the Russian Navy’s commander’s commissar told TASS on October 12.
        “The bookmark is scheduled for the second half of December this year,” the agency’s interlocutor recalled.
        Submarines of the Borey type should become the basis of Russia's naval strategic nuclear forces for the coming decades. As previously reported, by 2020 it is planned to build eight such submarines, three of which have already been transferred to the fleet. Each such boat carries 16 Bulava intercontinental ballistic missiles.
        Now the construction of the series continues under an improved project - Borey-A. Its first representative was the submarine "Prince Vladimir", laid down in 2012. In 2014, two submarines were laid down at once - Prince Oleg and Generalissimo Suvorov.
    2. vladimirZ 13 October 2015 06: 57 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Russian statehood, the strength of our country, rests on three pillars - ideology, military power, and economy.
      - from an article by FC SKIF

      You just need to add that state ideology in modern Russia is prohibited by the Constitutionwritten and created at the behest of American instructors.
      The economy eke out a miserable existence under the pressure of liberal ideas, pro-American compradors in power, in the Government, CBR, other government agencies.
      And how will such statehood hold if the "two whales" of the three are frail, such as "dried roach"?
      Do not hold on to military power alone! Have you forgotten the experience of the late USSR?
      1. Azitral 13 October 2015 09: 37 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        ... state ideology in today's Russia is prohibited by the Constitution, written and created at the behest of American instructors ...
        And we are in public order. By the way, the only possible option, because well, this is not a state matter! It can only tactfully support, so as not to vomit. And - a penny to all of us, if we are not able to.
        1. venaya 13 October 2015 10: 13 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Azitral
          ... state ideology in today's Russia is prohibited by the Constitution, written and created at the behest of American instructors ....

          I’ll add a little: of course, foreigners also wrote the Constitution, but only during statehood it did not get 50% of the votes required by law for the total number of registered voters required by law adopted at the time of voting. So I'm sorry, I personally do not see any legislative basis for, at least, the non-compliance with the prohibition of state ideology, in view of the flimsy legal justification for the legality of adopting the constitution itself. It’s time to learn to make laws for ourselves, especially the basic ones.
      2. Uncle Joe 13 October 2015 17: 08 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: vladimirZ
        You just need to add that state ideology in modern Russia is prohibited by the Constitutionwritten and created at the behest of American instructors
        You're lying again.

        Ideology is a system of political, legal, moral, religious, aesthetic and philosophical views and ideas in which people's attitudes to reality are recognized and evaluated (encyclopedic dictionary)

        That is, ideology is a system of values ​​(dyad good-bad) and the worldview based on it.


        Article 13 1. In the Russian Federation, ideological diversity is recognized.
        2. No ideology can be established as state or mandatory.

        At the same time, something as state or mandatory can only be established by fixing in a legal norm.
        That is, in order for ideology to be established as state and mandatory, it must be fixed in a legal norm, while ceasing to be an ideology (worldview, value system), and turned into a legal norm, into a law.

        That is, the constitution prohibits make laws (they are accepted by the State Duma of the Russian Federation), establishing a "correct" and mandatory way of thinking - now this can only be done through a popular referendum.
        Thanks to this article, no EP can, by a majority of its votes, pass a law obliging a citizen to think in the way that the bourgeois-oligarchic authorities want — cannot establish criminal or administrative responsibility for the way of thinking.


        The Constitution of the Russian Federation (written in Russia and adopted at a nationwide referendum) is based on certain worldviews and a system of values ​​- it is the state ideology that has become law.


        You all know this, but for some reason you continue to lie.
        1. vladimirZ 13 October 2015 17: 54 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Article 13 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation
          .
          2. No ideology can be established as a state or mandatory.
          - Uncle Joe (1)


          Do you know how to read and understand Russian?
          There is no state ideology. It is written in Russian: "No ideology can be established as state or mandatory"
          - so it is written in the Constitution of the Russian Federation and you are given.
          What else are you making up, trying to pull by the ears what is not.
          1. Uncle Joe 13 October 2015 20: 44 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: vladimirZ
            Do you know how to read and understand Russian?
            I am able both that, and another - apparently unlike you. In addition to these skills, I also know the definitions of the terms used, and I understand the algorithm of the legal mechanisms.

            If you do not agree with the obvious scenario, which I chewed in the previous comment, then please be kind enough to answer what ideology is and how it can be established as a state (all state is mandatory) or mandatory (in the Russian Federation, as in any other state, everything obligatory = state)?

            There is no state ideology. It is written in Russian: "No ideology can be established
            It is written in Russian that it cannot be installed, and not that it does not exist.

            You undertake to assert that there is no ideology without bothering to figure out what it is, in fact, and, in the end, you are talking nonsense of the same plan that you carried in relation to the supremacy of international law (you didn’t even bother to find out what m-law is)

            What else are you making up, trying to pull by the ears what is not.
            Once again - WHAT IS IDEOLOGY WHAT IS EXACTLY FORBIDDEN BY THE CONSTITUTION?
            1. vladimirZ 14 October 2015 06: 08 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              then kindly answer what ideology is and how it can be established as a state
              - Uncle Joe (1)

              You are funny. One must understand what is simply “ideology” and what is “state ideology”. You need to know their differences. These are different concepts.

              Ideology is a combination of worldview views and practical actions, aimed at realizing interests and needs various classes and social groups.

              State ideology is a combination of worldviews and practical actions of the stateaimed either at protecting the fundamental interests of the people, or, conversely, against them.

              State ideology can express the interests and will of the minority (as it is today) or the majority, as it was before in the USSR.
              Now why in the Constitution of the Russian Federation it is written about the prohibition of state ideology.
              Writing openly that the state ideology in Russia today is the ideology of the interests of a rich minority, as opposed to the interests of the people, this meant coming into conflict with the foundation of the Constitution, which states that the people are the only sovereign and source of power.
              Such a state ideology would never find a response among the majority of the people and would not become nation-wide.

              Therefore, it is easier to write down an official ban on state ideology in the Constitution, but to preserve it, in fact in the form of an unofficial state ideology of a rich class minority, and express it in the form of a combination of worldview views and practical actions aimed at realizing the interests and needs of a rich class of oligarchs and officials, in counterbalance to national interests.
              Thus, there is no state nationwide ideology supported by all the people in Russia.

              So, what is your advice “You undertake to assert that there is no ideology without bothering to figure out what it is, in fact, and, in the end, are talking nonsense ...” pay attention to yourself before condemning others.

              Read at least some material about state ideology, for example, “State ideology” by Alexander Yakovlev, Doctor of Philosophy, Professor.
              http://library.by/portalus/modules/theoryoflaw/readme.phparchive&id=1395574960&s

              tart_from & subaction = showfull & ucat
              1. Uncle Joe 14 October 2015 16: 29 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                You write about the ideological attitudes of the STATE, but am I funny? laughing

                And it’s okay to write it yourself (among the generally accepted definitions you can’t find such nonsense), no, they pulled this gentleman from http://viperson.ru/people/yakovlev-aleksandr-ilich

                The state is a political form of organization of society, a political system, an instrument in the hands of the ruling class.
                This is not a man - he has neither worldviews, nor interests.

                The worldview of the state is the worldview of the ruling class, common to all representatives of the latter.
                And the practical actions of the state, always aimed at upholding the interests of the ruling class, and not at upholding or infringing upon the interests of the abstract people, are called politics.

                Now why is it written in the Constitution of the Russian Federation
                Reread two first chapters: a democratic state of law, a people as a source of power, a person as the highest value, a welfare state, equality before the law and the court, inadmissibility of adopting laws that derogate rights and freedoms - what is this?
                Where did all this come from the ceiling? Haphazardly, in isolation from the worldview and its underlying values?
                What lies at the basis of the first 64 articles - is it by chance not an ideology that has become the main norm, and therefore has ceased to be an ideology, has ceased to be perceived as an ideology?

                Now, like 79 years ago (where and in what form was the communist ideology fixed, what?) There is the only way to make the ideology of the state - to push it into a costitation, into a hard-to-change part (otherwise the legislative body will change it at its discretion) , which was done, as a result of which ideology ceased to be an ideology, and became the main norm.

                and express it in the form of a set of worldview views and practical actions aimed at realizing the interests and needs of a rich class of oligarchs and officials, as opposed to national interests
                This is not a consequence - it is a reason.

                Again, re-read the 1st and 2nd chapters, then look out the window and answer your question - what is common between the prescribed and the implemented?

                You can put in the 13th article even a communist ideology, at least 10 commandments - everything will remain as it is. It will remain because the ruling class is the bourgeoisie, and power is an oligarchy (that is, the majority does not have legal ways to influence it)
                As long as this situation persists, no constitutional amendments will change anything, while nonsense about the lack of state ideology in the constitution, and the presentation of this fake "absence" as the root of all problems will play into the hands of the oligarchy, giving it an active, but not very smart, parts of the population a false target.

                Thus, there is no state nation-wide ideology supported by all the people in Russia
                For the third time, re-reading the first two chapters of the constitution ...


                PS About how you can establish an ideology as state or mandatory, you "modestly kept silent."
                1. vladimirZ 15 October 2015 05: 05 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  To discuss with you, Uncle Joe (1), is "pour over from empty to empty."
                  I have such a boring relative, similar to you, discarding all generally accepted concepts, and trying to prove something "own", but in fact is nonsense.
                  Based on self-digging in your knowledge, you discard the knowledge already accumulated and found by other people. Trying to drop what is already there.
                  With people like you, you just need to stop the argument and not continue it.

                  For the rest who are looking for the answer why there is no state ideology in Russia, I will give an article and a video of the scientific-public conference "State ideology and modern Russia" in 2014.
                  http://rusrand.ru/science/gosudarstvennaja-ideologija-i-sovremennaja-rossija
                  1. Uncle Joe 15 October 2015 23: 18 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    Do you feel ashamed to hide behind such primitive verbiage in trying to save face? smile

                    What - on the topic absolutely, absolutely nothing to say? Yakovlev, with a company from the center of Sulakshin, forgot to enlighten you about how ideology can be established as a state, and how it was done in the USSR? laughing

                    Yes, it looks like a sucker is really not a mammoth ...
  2. Kir1984 13 October 2015 05: 57 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Ideology may be, but something does not smell of ideas
    1. The comment was deleted.
  3. nimboris 13 October 2015 05: 58 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    - Kashchei, where is your death?
    - In the egg.
    - Thousand (kick in the groin)
    - Oh-yo, damn it, but not in that. laughing
    But in fact, the collective West is Koschey. It is even customary to portray him in European armor - armor, with a direct euro sword laughing
    This is me compared to the needle and the egg.
  4. ImPerts 13 October 2015 06: 02 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Loses Erdogan, loses. The United States is losing its uniqueness and position as King of the Hill. Turkey - hopes for a king of the slides in the region. the Saudis and Qatar lose hope for a Sunni caliphate and total Islamization.
    Z. S. Turkey before Erdogan had no conflicts with surrounding countries, Turkey Erdogan is trying to quarrel with the entire perimeter.
  5. afdjhbn67 13 October 2015 06: 58 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    They thought up this foolishness with the national idea in the days of ebna .. then they had to spam people’s brains, but on the whole the article is good, our patriots will generally be delighted ..
    1. afdjhbn67 13 October 2015 07: 39 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: afdjhbn67
      They thought up this foolishness with the national idea in the days of ebna .. then they had to spam people’s brains, but on the whole the article is good, our patriots will generally be delighted ..


      I’ll recover - Hooray patriots,
      1. Shurale 13 October 2015 08: 10 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        This nonsense with a national idea as invented during ebony

        This is not a fool, it was necessary to destroy the old national idea, but alas, they really couldn’t come up with anything, Putin shouted "People, well, come up with what thread is the national idea! We don’t get anything !!!"
        And therefore, it doesn’t come out that there are only two national ideas, the old one cannot be missed abroad, the third is not given ...
        1. Uncle Joe 13 October 2015 17: 33 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Shurale
          the old one cannot be received abroad
          Actually, it turns out that the sucker is not a mammoth, and bourgeois quasi-patriotism in the mythologized consciousness has completely taken root.

          Another thing is that the economy fails, and brains start working better on an empty stomach. lol
  6. Tatar 174 13 October 2015 07: 02 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Posted by FC SKIF
    The battle for Syria will be long and difficult. In case of defeat, our “sovereign whales” will again surrender, all three, and we will already talk about the physical survival of Russia, but the victory opens up brilliant prospects in politics, economics, and security.

    Let's not think about defeat. The victory and completion of the liberation of Syria will be sooner or later. We have vast experience in liberating the territories of other countries, and it will help us. God and the Army with the Navy are with us!
  7. V.ic 13 October 2015 07: 25 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Only the Mongols at one time inflicted on our ancestors tabscess lesionbecause they came from such an ass of the world that even our severe frosts did not impress the invaders in any way. The author of FC SKIF

    And so total that the notorious crusaders were forced to flee as the Mongol troops approached, remembering the defeats from the Mongols during their campaign in Europe (including the battle of Legnica = 1241 from R.Kh.). The author forgot to mention the ever-memorable “Iron Timur,” which reached Yelts, who smashed all who stood in his way.
    1. venaya 13 October 2015 07: 59 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: V.ic
      Only the Mongols at one time inflicted on our ancestors tabscess lesionbecause they came from such an ass of the world that even our severe frosts did not impress the invaders in any way. The author of FC SKIF
      And so total that the notorious crusaders were forced to flee when the Mongol troops approached, remembering the defeats of the Mongols during their campaign in Europe ...

      Please forget about "mongols“- such a country arose in 1905, so they still don’t call themselves Mughals. The whole muddy“ story ”was muddied by the masson Karamzin so that we still can’t wash ourselves, it all smells of terrible Russophobia. By the way, in school textbooks they refused this term. It’s good if we, too, finally stop repeating utter nonsense.
      1. V.ic 13 October 2015 10: 22 New
        • -1
        • 0
        -1
        Quote: venaya
        Please forget about the "Mongols" - such a country arose in 1905, so they still do not call themselves Mughals.

        And then I did not know! Just a little bit ... But you too have questions: are you unaware of the presence in the history of China of a "purely Chinese" Yuan dynasty (1271-1368)? What kind of "Chinese emperor" was Khubilai Khan and what sexual relationship did he have with Genghis Khan?
    2. Azitral 13 October 2015 09: 41 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      He was from the south and he was smart. Dumped on time.
      1. V.ic 13 October 2015 10: 24 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Azitral
        He was from the south and he was smart. Dumped on time

        It’s good to be smart, like my wife later ... Timur was a commander who did not know defeats.
  8. Reptiloid 13 October 2015 07: 45 New
    • -3
    • 0
    -3
    I liked the article, thanks to the author.
    Three whales are still of different sizes.
    One-- stepped up, looking and the others will be pulled up to its size!
  9. sa-ag 13 October 2015 07: 47 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    "Russian statehood, the strength of our country, rests on three pillars - ideology, military power, economy"

    Sorry, but what kind of ideology is this, what purpose does it determine and what are the ways to achieve it? And what about the economy? As far as I know, the commodity model prevails, which is very dependent on the price of raw materials and something is not visible investment in industry
  10. Gardamir 13 October 2015 07: 49 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    We constantly collect land lost during the reign of either narrow-minded people or outright traitors
    I don’t know what the author collects, but for some reason everyone keeps silent about the gifts to the Chinese and Norwegians. Good gathering, two presented one chopped off.
    And the word partners is used only by one person, he has all the partners, he would have to bargain in the bazaar, and not manage the country, there are all partners.
    About Syria. What are the naive who believe that the igil can be destroyed in the vastness of Syria. How many of us have been brought in over the past 15 years. They have their own restaurants, where only their own go, please do whatever you like, the policemen will not go there.
    And as for patriotism, as they say, love for one's native is patriotism.
    1. BMW
      BMW 13 October 2015 08: 41 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Gardamir
      And as for patriotism, as they say, love for one’s native is patriotism

      Absolutely, otherwise they turned it into an idea - what is stupidity.
      Quote: Gardamir

      And the word partners is used only by one person, he has all the partners, he would have to bargain in the bazaar, and not manage the country, there are all partners.

      I already wrote that the word "partners" just jars, if you follow the logic of the Russian language, then partners are in business and sex. Draw your own conclusions, I think the second.
  11. Shurale 13 October 2015 08: 07 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    Three whales of Russian statehood

    I do not know how it was before, but now there are three whales of the Russian state:
    1) Commodity Economics
    2) Theft
    3) Corruption
  12. N-SKiy 13 October 2015 08: 25 New
    • -3
    • 0
    -3
    Only the Mongols at one time inflicted a total defeat of e on our ancestors, because he came from such an ass of the world that even our severe frosts did not impress the invaders in any way.
    Quote: venaya
    Quote: V.ic
    Only the Mongols at one time inflicted on our ancestors tabscess lesionbecause they came from such an ass of the world that even our severe frosts did not impress the invaders in any way. The author of FC SKIF
    And so total that the notorious crusaders were forced to flee when the Mongol troops approached, remembering the defeats of the Mongols during their campaign in Europe ...

    Please forget about "mongols“- such a country arose in 1905, so they still don’t call themselves Mughals. The whole muddy“ story ”was muddied by the masson Karamzin so that we still can’t wash ourselves, it all smells of terrible Russophobia. By the way, in school textbooks they refused this term. It’s good if we, too, finally stop repeating utter nonsense.

    And the Tatars occurred by the decision of Lenin’s grandfather used to be called Bulgars. There is an educational video on YouTube (Who are the Russians)
    1. venaya 13 October 2015 09: 06 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: N-SKiy
      ... And the Tatars occurred by the decision of Lenin's grandfather, formerly called Bulgars. There is an educational video on YouTube (Who are the Russians)

      Well, it’s slander, for both grandfather and grandmother. In 1918, such an inscription really appeared in a passport of the nationality type “Tatar”, but it has its own history: In the XNUMXth century there were really Tatars, but this was not a nationality, but a specialty such as “Vikings”, etc. , that is, people involved in military affairs (robbery, too, hence the proverb: "an uninvited guest is worse ..."). At the same time, a tribe of "Bulgars", of Finno-Ugric origin, who had nothing to do with the Turkic tribes, lived on the Volga, but someone taught them to the language from the Turkic language group. They are direct relatives of the “non-Volga Bulgars” of modern Bulgarians, the latter still speak the dialect of the Russian language, because all the same from the Volga. They write what was called the "Tatars" of the Volga Bulgars after the campaigns of John IV, somehow.
  13. Ilya77 13 October 2015 08: 51 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    How to love power after such news here - http://lenta.ru/news/2015/10/13/duma/. What are they in the Duma, completely fucked up. Everyone is urged to tighten their belts, and they themselves raise their salaries by 2 times.
    1. sds87 13 October 2015 09: 48 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Well, they work in the sweat of our faces, and we, the people, hang around the bucks in their opinion. Therefore, the people shrink their belts, and buy pants for themselves 3 sizes more to buy - * opa does not fit already. I'm already out of action of our government and the State Duma. It feels like they really (politicians, not the people) want to make a revolution in the near future - to bring the boil in the people to a critical mass.
  14. Volzhanin 13 October 2015 09: 02 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    So I think - we have a full house of traitors, collaborators, agents of influence and other rubbish. And the closer to the tops of power, the greater their percentage. They are like weights on their feet, they do not allow either to scatter or fly up.
    Well, how can we conduct an effective foreign policy when our ghouls from the economic (and not only) bloc openly poke crowbars into the wheels of the Russian economy !!!
    The author hopes
    I hope that the difficult economic situation will force us to drive out the "collective Chubais" from high offices, bringing decent and smart ones there
    I also hope, but it is obvious that one hope is not enough, and nowhere else have I come across any meaningful program to remove these trash of society from government.
  15. loaln 13 October 2015 09: 53 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Many were interested in this promise. I will repeat myself. From a different angle.
    "That in the time of Russia, that under Ivan the Terrible, that under the Romanovs, that under the USSR, that now the ideology is essentially the same. We constantly collect land lost during the reign of either far-sighted people or outright traitors."

    Tearful. But inaccurate. This is not an ideology. This is a function of the state. And, here, it is supported by ideology. Unity, democracy, omnipotence of money. Something else in history was not noticed. And in what phraseological shell this or that ideology turned into, was determined by the era, national characteristics, level of economic development, prevalence of religious views, etc.
    So, the current attempts of "ideologists" - this is another attempt to "pull" a new verbal husk on one of the financial monsters or monsters in order to ensure their comfortable existence.
    And the use of patriotic mantras for these purposes will quickly lead to the effect of "palling". And then, when it will really be necessary, understanding will arise about the ambiguity that has arisen for its practical use.
  16. loaln 13 October 2015 09: 54 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    As a postscript.
    A new ideology is not created when those who do not explain the main thing to their people rule.
    Why can one overthrow the state system (we did not observe the collapse of the USSR, namely, the overthrow of the state system) and use it to blame the Constitution for the immutability of the state system.
    This is nothing more than the protection of state criminals. And what ideology can be on this basis? Another myth?
  17. akudr48 13 October 2015 09: 59 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    the strength of our country rests on three pillars - ideology, military power, and economy.

    This is true, but not complete.

    It is bad that the author did not say about the main force - about the Russian people, which still shows miracles of patience and endurance, despite the robbery of its "elite" during the reforms (which have not yet ended, are still ahead ..), not paying attention to looting, stealing and taking wealth to our sworn partners for the cordon, forgetting about her, the elite, betrayal and work for the enemy, and other tricks of the "elite".

    What will end earlier - such an "elite" or the country of Russia, that is the question.
  18. traveler 13 October 2015 11: 05 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    1 whale of Russian statehood - the population. centuries-old demographic superiority over external neighbors and national minorities inside. if there were 10 times less Russians, it would be Belarusians (no offense, a good people and a wonderful country), with an appropriate role in the world and on the map. therefore, population growth, or at least maintaining it at the current level should be the main task, without it, sooner or later everything will begin to crumble.
  19. Selevc 13 October 2015 11: 31 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    Russian statehood, the strength of our country, rests on three pillars - ideology, military power, and economy.
    I’ll add a “fly in the ointment” to the “barrel of honey” which the article represents ... There is no ideology in modern Russia (but it was in the USSR) - one can hardly call ideology the pursuit of personal enrichment, military power is the legacy of the USSR and its continuation (not enough what is created from scratch, it’s good that not everything is lost (Ukraine is a vivid example of self-destruction of the military-industrial complex), the economy is where, surprisingly, not everything is so bad ... At every corner they shout that the Russian economy depends on raw materials - but is this really critical? After all, you reduce external debt (while others accumulate), build your planes, make your cars, ships, and much more ... There is enormous potential for development - in general, everything is not so bad as the mattresses with the gay men are trying to imagine !!! It’s just that they’re bad - but politics is an eternal, rash struggle - so listen and think the other way around !!!
  20. Reptiloid 13 October 2015 11: 56 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    Quote: Reptiloid
    I liked the article, thanks to the author.
    Three whales are still of different sizes.
    One-- stepped up, looking and the others will be pulled up to its size!

    The minus is not clear, it follows --- U.K.r.p.Nil. S.I.
  21. w3554152 13 October 2015 12: 38 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Russian statehood, the strength of our country, rests on three pillars - ideology, military power, and economy.

    Did the author really not know that the Russian Civilization rests on other "pillars" - the idea of ​​justice, Pushkin and the Russian language. Everything else is derivative. Article minus.
  22. Stirbjorn 13 October 2015 12: 54 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Actually, I thought that one of the whales would be - the people ...
    1. Artakon 13 October 2015 14: 05 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Stirbjorn
      Actually, I thought that one of the whales would be - the people ...

      From ancient times, the people have performed only a service function. The people is a means, not an end
  23. Artakon 13 October 2015 14: 04 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    It looks like a school essay
  24. ALEA IACTA EST 13 October 2015 17: 18 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Hatred, brute force and money are some precarious support ...
  25. sanyavolhv 13 October 2015 17: 51 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    health.
    article minus. the country is held by PEOPLE, Economics, and the army. why the author did not notice the people in the country ??? BIG - .
    ideology is necessary for the people. but ideology itself does NOT MEAN ANYTHING.
  26. LCA
    LCA 13 October 2015 20: 51 New
    • -2
    • 0
    -2
    Unifying is the Idea of ​​creating the Kingdom of God on Earth through the efforts of people themselves in God's guidance. In it, none of the people will be a slave to another, no one will oppress and tyrannize others, and everyone will live freely, developing their personal development potential, based on dialogue with God (and not faith in God) through life.

    The future is realized not according to the proclaimed ideals, but according to the real morality of people, which controls the entire mental activity of individuals and collectives.
    If morality prevailing in society does not change, then the sequence “past - present - future” really closes in the ring. And these rings are infernal circles of endless torment on Earth.

    At the beginning of XXI, Russia again faces the need for a new cultural transformation, but this time more grandiose and hitherto unknown to all the peoples of the planet Earth. Its essence lies in moral transformation, which is possible provided that reasoning on the authority of traditions, scriptures and leaders gives way to a culture of feelings and thinking, which will enable each individual to become a person. And this process has begun in Russia.

    Therefore, the future development of mankind lies precisely in the mainstream of high morality, justice and righteousness, although there are still many difficulties to overcome.


    A concept is first of all morality and a moral outlook accompanying morality, from the position of which an understanding of the work of the social system as a whole is expressed, from the understanding of which a leading plan for living arrangement is developed.

    The concept of society’s life as an ideal and as a set of tools designed to bring this ideal to life.

    Ideology is not always an expression of a concept, but one of the means of bringing the concept to life.

    Conceptual power is objectively lawful, both due to the fact that all legislation is always an expression of one or another concept of the organization of society’s life, and due to the fact that conceptual power is an inalienable property of everyone who has risen worldview and self-discipline to the ability to implement it .

    Russia needs conceptually powerful people.

    The term “conceptual power” should be understood in two ways:
    - firstly, as the power of the group that is capable of forming the concept of public life, introducing it into the real process of public administration, and also adjusting it as necessary in the process of implementing public administration;
    - secondly, as the power of concept over society.

    CONCEPTUAL POWER carries:
    • recognition of factors that put environmental pressure on society;
    • forming a vector of goals in relation to the factor exerting pressure;
    . the formation of an appropriate concept for managing society’s resources in relation to the identified factor.

    The conceptual power in Russian civilization will rise to its full potential - the ideological, legislative, executive and judicial authorities will not go anywhere and will, in accordance with the full function of management, do their job in the concept of democracy in God.

    And all legislation is border lines or front lines on which one concept protects itself from the implementation in the same society of another concept that is not compatible with it.