Who is next? Democracy is waiting!

We were happy to hear about the award of the Nobel Prize in literature to the Belarusian writer Svetlana Aleksiyevich. Russian-speaking writer, a man, apparently, close to us in spirit. Somehow, the rightness of a person who wrote about the Great Patriotic War a book “Not a Woman's Face in a War” was already perceived a priori. It gained such fame, translated into 20 languages, for which the film and performances were created.


But after the article in the Spanish “EL PAÍS”, where Aleksiyevich’s communication with the Spanish journalists, whom she invited to her home in Minsk, is described, suddenly came to mind stories about some of our heroes. They did not know the fear on the war fronts, but in the post-war period they broke down, broke down as individuals for various reasons. On the other options just do not want to think.

I cite this article in abbreviation, omitting the lyrics.

This time, the Nobel Prize for Literature has nothing to do with the catastrophes described earlier in her books, neither to World War II, nor to the Soviet military experience in Afghanistan, nor to the Chernobyl accident or the collapse of the USSR. She is worried about Russia. She already sees what is happening with the Russian people. “Now you can expect anything,” says Svetlana. “Five or six years ago, when I spoke about Russian nationalism, nobody believed me. Nevertheless, we have several Russian ... Putin's third term pulled us out of the romanticism of 90's. The country has changed, deceived the people. Now orient it in the right direction. I mean anti-Western militarism. When I was in Russia in search of material for my last book, I saw deceived and aggressive people, which could lead to a bad end. But no one expected the return of the Soviet era, which captures a country that has already tried to start a new life. Previously, the ultimate goal was to preserve the empire, but I don’t know what the logic and motives of what is happening now, ”she says about Russian foreign policy, not hiding concerns about the need to turn this machine back as soon as possible. “In the nineties, we asked for freedom, and people were silent. The country was not ready for change. Violence, moral degradation came, and when Putin suddenly pressed the most primitive button, the people began to speak, and when he spoke, we were all afraid, ”she says. (Note: here is a quote, not a translation error).

Further short reference from “EL PAÍS”: Svetlana Alexievich was born in Ukraine. She is the daughter of the Soviet military. When my father left the army, the family settled in Belarus. Her book "The Voices of Chernobyl" was published by the Spanish publishing house Debolsillo. The latest book, The End of the Homo Sovieticus, will be published at the beginning of 2016.

Well, finally, the reason for the award was clarified. She is worried about Russia. And Aleksievich freely comes to the place where she cares so much, to collect the necessary materials. For some reason, the “Soviet” regime does not interfere. How well she knows Russian life, the mood and aspirations of the working people. (Sorry for the Soviet style.) As a true prophet, he warns about something terrible that will certainly happen soon if Putin’s machine is not turned back.

How well chosen moment! About Ukraine already began to forget somehow. European interest has cooled. And then please: Belarus is in development. The newly-minted Nobel laureate is seriously worried about Russia captured by the Soviet era. At the same time, for some reason, I recall fantastic films with the landing on Earth of bloodthirsty aliens. Otherwise, how could this most evil era be able to seize Russia?

Lukashenko, who won the presidential election for the fifth time, is openly moving toward a rapprochement with the European Union and the United States. It seems that from Russia he wants to fuck as much as possible. And this does not show any originality. This is exactly what Yanukovych did when he declared that it was necessary to extract the maximum benefit from the geographical position of Ukraine, because it is between Europe and Russia. Maybe they still have the wrong rake, they do not give the desired effect. Where is now a lover of convergence by the name of Yanukovych, whose life was saved by Putin?

Sad feeling arises when leaders of countries do not learn lessons. Probably, they did not study well at school and were not used to doing work on mistakes.

It seems that bears are also found in Belarusian forests. Of these, you can make a lot of stuffed animals. Then hang on the wall, and when their mole eats, then you can throw out. This is not a problem, is it?
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Finches 13 October 2015 06: 22 New
    • 49
    • 0
    +49
    Personally, I appreciate her work as shit! Moreover, this is not an insult, but a statement of fact, but I do not impose this opinion on anyone! As for the writer's remarks - she really wanted to receive the Nobel Prize, she received it - the act of an ordinary corrupt whore! But all the same, I recommended such individuals to speak on their own behalf, and not on behalf of the whole people! With us, even Lev Nikolaevich and Alexander Sergeevich did not allow themselves to do this! Fyodor Mikhailovich could, but even then selectively ... The Nobel laureates should be more modest ...
    1. vodolaz 13 October 2015 07: 15 New
      • 14
      • 0
      +14
      Quote: Finches
      Personally, I value her work as shit!

      And I didn’t hear about it, apparently fortunately)))) Although, after the Nobel was awarded the title to the main American Negro, I became disappointed in her, at least in these nominations, the faith in science was still preserved.
      1. Bekas1967 13 October 2015 08: 17 New
        • -27
        • 0
        -27
        Well, are the Negroes not people ??? Racists have already grabbed onto the site! Where do you get the everyday aplomb from? Come up to the Negro and spit in his face then if you want to. Well, grab it to the full cradle. By the way, if it is white president, you kiss him the ass? White love Russia so much, fascists only white happen!
        1. RU-Officer 13 October 2015 09: 09 New
          • 25
          • 0
          +25
          "Bekas1967", dear, and where did you find racist reasoning at "vodolaz"? fool In fact, Obama is a Negro, so what - command me to call him "excessively tanned," or what? What are you doing out of the blue racist showdown? We have already made friends with Solovyov Zhirinovsky laughing and you all the same ... negative By the way - about people. Take a trip to Detroit, for example, where the “indigenous” people will quickly explain to you about the tolerance and color sensation of the world. angry And if this is far from handy - at least to Europe, now the "refugees" are lighting it - and all from the same opera. hi
          1. Bekas1967 13 October 2015 09: 57 New
            • -9
            • 0
            -9
            I can explain, but from personal experience it’s useless to people like you! A person directly indicates race, doesn’t just write to Obama, if he were white, he wasn’t such a stupid president. (By the way, Bush’s oligophrenic is white)) )))) that is, the US problem is that they have a black president?))) only in this? if we turn to a person to add his race, then this is what we get - the Negro poet Pushkin, crest Gogol, and Zh Zhirinovsky ... And so on! Our lumpen and dodges from the workers' quarters, fans, are no better than those who ignite in Europe. Why go so far ??? Or are you for stoves in which they burn well? And then ??? we are on the different line of the Front .... the fascists also began with the words F and q, then they marked everyone, then in the geto, and then the COOKERS! DO NOT START .. Don’t tell me! I’ve seen enough. AND YOU'RE GO AND LOOK.
            1. Bekas1967 13 October 2015 16: 47 New
              • -5
              • 0
              -5
              Here are those who are minus me personally: you are no different from ukronatsik !!! Hitler also started with nat.idea, how many ended up not understanding, they were not burned in concentration camps ... ANY EXCELLENCE IN THE MINDS OF PEOPLE OF OUR NATION IS OVER OTHERS AND THERE IS AN ORDINARY FASCISM. Having hated others on a national basis, you are ready-made material for the Nazis. It remains only to unite and extinguish all who are NOT SUCH .... You have mixed up patriotism with Naziism. In the first case, you love your homeland, but the second you hate strangers. .
          2. Lexeus 13 October 2015 10: 03 New
            • 6
            • 0
            +6
            Son at school called "African American" smile to the "bloody battle" lol , and he rushed to the director, the result is a fine ... They are all spoiled there, arrogant and stupid ...
            1. Bekas1967 13 October 2015 11: 55 New
              • -10
              • 0
              -10
              Yeah, tell the little snitches here? Or have forgotten how in the 37th they knocked on each other?
              1. Russian Uzbek 13 October 2015 12: 43 New
                • -5
                • 0
                -5
                TOMORROW LIFE WILL MAKE AND EVERYTHING AGAIN ON THE RACES WILL RUN TO KNOW FRIEND ON FRIEND !!!
                so this is nothing unusual ... from the point of view of human psychology - this is NORMAL ... completely normal behavior of human society
                1. Alena Frolovna 13 October 2015 14: 02 New
                  • 5
                  • 0
                  +5
                  Who is next? Democracy is waiting!


                  Meanwhile, in one of the supermarkets

              2. The comment was deleted.
              3. Lexeus 13 October 2015 21: 26 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Yes, I do not laughing remembered, and judging by 1967, you should not remember that either laughing
        2. lukewarm 13 October 2015 09: 53 New
          • 12
          • 0
          +12
          Unlike you, dear, vodolaz did not slip to personal insults of members of the forum. This is me about
          Quote: Bekas1967
          you only deal with everyday aplomb
          .
          So you have aplomb with Ksenia Sobchak, you are our "non-fiction" tolerant. By the way, it’s strange that I didn’t write anything about quilted jackets, snipe. As for the style and logic of presentation, it begs. Or is it still to come?
          What about the case? The Obama Peace Prize immediately became a laughing stock. He was called the president of the war even in his first term, and all his wars were predicted. And not even because of personal qualities, but he is just like a puppet behind the scenes doomed to do so.
          1. Bekas1967 13 October 2015 10: 07 New
            • -12
            • 0
            -12
            It’s not for you to instruct me! I’m still keeping my party card, well-deserved !!! And racism is just a bum and confusion !!! the next one will follow Obama and will not change anything! They are enemies by ideology but not by nationality ...
        3. Bekas1967 13 October 2015 16: 50 New
          • -3
          • 0
          -3
          See people "12 years of slavery", maybe you’ll just think ... it just won’t change, Nazism is worse than cancer, it’s not treated (((
        4. Bekas1967 13 October 2015 20: 25 New
          • -1
          • 0
          -1
          Oh, and dofiga, you Natsik (((I continue to take it on the minuses .. I repeat: YOU ROGED OUT !!!!!!! B D Y O undeterred ... Pushkin did a billion times more for Russia than all of you put together .Tagil rules(((((
      2. Buffalo 13 October 2015 11: 04 New
        • 8
        • 0
        +8
        Yuri Kobaladze, in one of the TVs. interview, told a joke about the Nobel Prize.
        Two scouts are talking, American and Soviet.
        American:
        - What is your reward given to a foreign citizen who has committed treason in relation to his homeland and switched to your side?
        - Present to the title Hero of the Soviet Union.
        Soviet:
        - And what do you reward traitors to the motherland who have switched to your side ??
        - The Nobel Prize.
        1. Bekas1967 13 October 2015 11: 58 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          They ran across to us for ideological reasons, and to them for material reasons. That's the whole difference! I’ll tell you a huge difference.
    2. Loner_53 13 October 2015 07: 54 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Personally, I value her work as shit!


      Not in the eyebrow but in the eye, or rather you will not say.
    3. Russian Uzbek 13 October 2015 08: 27 New
      • 9
      • 0
      +9
      so nobel in literature in 99% of cases - and give for shit! except Sholokhov, no WRITER comes to mind!
      solid "essayists" and "essayists" ....
      and enough already about this lady - tired ...
    4. Max_Bauder 13 October 2015 09: 16 New
      • 12
      • 0
      +12
      Well, finally, the reason for the award was clarified. She cares about Russia


      That's it!

      The West is interested in any insignificant who could say bad things about his homeland and thereby rise above other relatives, pride is what drives such personalities. Do something useful for your country and become the pride of your people, but no, it’s easier to cheat on it, then others will pat it on the head, or it will be enemies. Making a name for yourself on black is easier than on white.

      As for the interest of Western spies from citizens dissatisfied with the authorities, I recalled the story of a driver who had an excursion in Kazakhstan, in Almaty: I’m talking with tourists from the USA, telling me about the country, they look out the window and they’re not interested, I suspected - it’s not tourists, they don’t take pictures of scenic spots, but when military trucks or military men see them, they start to “click”, and they ask - what is this ?, I answer - the military exercises are carried out, planned. And then one asks me how you accidentally - here you are - Russian, live with Kazakhs, they do not oppress you? to which I replied - yes, they have one quality, I am very dissatisfied with it. And then all ears pricked up, listened. I say - Everyone pulls you to visit, you come to their house, they all feed and feed you for slaughter, beshparmakami, kazy, drink koumiss, you see my stomach is already big from all this food, and so I don’t drive, I'm tired has already. laughing So the spies broke off. wink
    5. GRAY 13 October 2015 09: 24 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Quote: Finches
      The Nobel laureates must be more modest ...

      What other modesty? There is no conscience and never was.
      I don’t know if Aleksievich is worried about the fate of Russia, but the fact that Russia is not worried about the fate of Aleksievich (and what she got there) is for sure.
    6. Vend 13 October 2015 11: 51 New
      • 9
      • 0
      +9
      Quote: Finches
      Personally, I value her work as shit!

      And not only you.
      "Swiss writer Helene Richard-Favre, author of the books" Nouvelles de nulle part "," Nouvelles de rien "and" Nouvelles de Personne "addressed an open letter to Svetlana Aleksievich, Nobel laureate-2015 in literature reports baltnews.ee.

      Recall that the Belarusian writer Svetlana Alexievich at a press conference in Minsk after she received the Nobel Prize stated that the war in Donbass, which killed more than 8 thousand people, was the result of foreign intervention.

      “This is an occupation, this is a foreign invasion,” said Aleksiyevich.

      Also, a Belarusian writer said that in Russia “86% of people became happy” to kill people in Donetsk.

      We give the text of the open letter Helene Richard-Favre, which she wrote Alexievich.

      “Madam Aleksievich,

      in the Donbas, which you mentioned during your press conference, a woman named Lilia, 24's, broke off her leg when, following her maternal instinct, she covered her 11-month-old son with her body. They were both on the bus, which was under fire.

      This, like many other similar cases of murder and destruction in the Donbas, is the result of government action, which is supported by the West.

      I urge you to read this article by a French journalist based in Donetsk: http://dnipress.com/fr/posts/lilia-24-ans-une-jambe-arrachee-elle-sauve-son-peti
      t-garcon /

      What happened to Lilia is far from an isolated incident, and I hope you understand this. (Lily was treated in Moscow, - Ed.)

      We all have to choose the topics about which we write. You made your choice and found your audience that admires them.

      But you, the one that made the basis of your creativity the fight against lies, how can you claim that 86% of Russians rejoice in the deaths of people in the Donbas?

      Madame, by stating this, you are not just lying, you are not just mistaken, you have disdained reality.

      Sincerely, Helen RISHAR-FAVR "

      French original: http://voix.blog.tdg.ch/archive/2015/10/10/lettre-ouverte.html

      Translation - Arkady Beinenson "
    7. Bekas1967 13 October 2015 16: 58 New
      • -8
      • 0
      -8
      Well done! I called the woman a whore grabbed the pluses, the General. The officer himself will not allow this. If her work doesn’t affect you, just don’t read and ignore how I do it, but to be rude in this style for the pros is lower than the man ... officers, WHY WHY ??? where are we going?
      1. Finches 13 October 2015 21: 12 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Call me to the duel-My email: [email protected]! Call-Eugene! St. Petersburg!
        1. Bekas1967 16 October 2015 16: 55 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Write to me in PM.
      2. BMP-2 14 October 2015 00: 04 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        The lieutenant no longer pour: otherwise he sees a woman where she has long been gone ... drinks

        But
        90s romanticism
        - says that either a person has big problems with memory, or banditry is the norm for him. But then you do not need to wait for everyone around to shatter before the next Manka bond.
  2. Kos_kalinki9 13 October 2015 06: 31 New
    • 15
    • 0
    +15
    Yesterday there was an article about her, today two. Is it too much honor given to this "writer". Well, I'm sorry, the next farted, the wind blew and okay. Forgot.
  3. loha 13 October 2015 06: 37 New
    • 16
    • 0
    +16
    and where does it come from? that she is a Belarusian writer, from the fact that she has been living in Minsk for the last year.?
    so she didn’t write a word on mov, and her works of art never pull, journalism is somehow
    with claims that she was someone who said something.
  4. Mentor 13 October 2015 06: 38 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    The article is a minus. As usual, the author made an elephant from several statements of Lukashenko, and, following the sweet habit of some, he runs with a cry of "Everything is lost." I completely agree with Zyablicev’s opinion, the only thing I want to add is that this laureate went along the path of Solzhenitsyn, collecting all his fiction and rumors in his books. That's just unlike Solzhenitsyn, she does not know how to write independently. The reporter of the district newspaper. Well, the Swedes, by order of the liberals, made an icon for people who agree to everything, just to once again discredit Russia and Belarus.
    1. EvgNik 13 October 2015 07: 04 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Quote: Mentor
      That's just unlike Solzhenitsyn write independently she can not

      This is true that she cannot write on her own (Solzhenitsyn as a writer is nothing — a male Alexievich), but she is not a writer! She is a mediocre journalist, living not with her ideas and thoughts. “The War Does Not Have a Female Face” is a collection of memoirs of women who survived the war. Not a writer Aleksievich - journalist, conjuncturist writing for orders.
    2. afdjhbn67 13 October 2015 07: 13 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      Quote: Mentor
      The article is a minus. As usual, the author made an elephant from several statements of Lukashenko, and, following the sweet habit of some, he runs with a cry of "Everything is lost." I completely agree with Zyablicev’s opinion, the only thing I want to add is that this laureate went along the path of Solzhenitsyn, collecting all his fiction and rumors in his books. That's just unlike Solzhenitsyn, she does not know how to write independently. The reporter of the district newspaper. Well, the Swedes, by order of the liberals, made an icon for people who agree to everything, just to once again discredit Russia and Belarus.


      Quote: My address
      Great Solzhenitsyn?

      I do not agree. I was brought up on L. Tolstoy, London, Pushkin, Dickens, Chekhov, etc. In Solzhenitsyn decently written only the story "One Day ...". On a pull, in 70-x, took out the "Cancer Corps" and stunned unreadable. Then I tried something else and in the same way. It is quite likely the version of the literary processing of "One Day" by a real writer, attached to him by a girl, with whom he quarreled.
      I have a question for praising Solzhenitsyn - did you read it? Similarly, the "Doctor Zhevago" Pasternak, which, in my opinion, the average literature. And they did not print it foolishly in the USSR, otherwise they would have forgotten this book a year later.

      I am waiting for all the Nobel Prizes to be officially awarded "For contributions to the fight against Russia."

      At Solzh I really could only read "One Day" .. I fully share your opinion.
      1. ingener1966 13 October 2015 11: 20 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        As for Solzhenitsyn completely agree, unreadable !!!! I began to read about twenty times, and could not master a single work to the end ..... request
    3. oracul 13 October 2015 07: 18 New
      • -4
      • 0
      -4
      Do not simplify - it’s obvious that Lukashenko is more cunning, more resourceful, more power-hungry, and more a nationalist than Yanukovych. Relate to what he says and does (South Ossetia, Abkhazia, the former president of Kyrgyzstan, Donbass, Ukraine, the change of historical vectors in Belarus) and then you will understand that inside he follows his special course.
      1. afdjhbn67 13 October 2015 07: 30 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: oracul
        Do not simplify - it’s obvious that Lukashenko is more cunning, more resourceful, more power-hungry, and more a nationalist than Yanukovych. Relate to what he says and does (South Ossetia, Abkhazia, the former president of Kyrgyzstan, Donbass, Ukraine, the change of historical vectors in Belarus) and then you will understand that inside he follows his special course.


        Or maybe just smarter? So many derogatory epithets-as if you describe the enemy of Russia ..
  5. free 13 October 2015 06: 54 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    sometimes just sorry that now is not the 37th!
  6. press officer 13 October 2015 06: 56 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Soon, with such "successes", both Sobakosshvili and Parashe and Zayts will give the Nobel Prize to the spectacle-eyed and bloody pastor, and to our "intercessors" and young reformers from the 90s! Nobel became Shnobelev!
  7. V.ic 13 October 2015 07: 13 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Nobel Prizes in literature and peacemaking = this is pure perversion.
  8. BLOND 13 October 2015 07: 28 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    I have a more mundane question ...
    And in Minsk there is nobody to spit at least for her feet (let him drown, so to speak, to express the opinion of the people and not the mattresses)
    1. kotvov 13 October 2015 11: 30 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      And what in Minsk there is nobody to spit at least for her feet ,,
      and you think she lives in Belarus, her address is Paris.
  9. rotmistr60 13 October 2015 07: 31 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Already after Obama was awarded the Peace Prize in advance, it was possible to put a bold cross on this profanity. And literary prizes have been awarded to someone from the USSR for decades, only the so-called "fighters with the regime." Therefore, I think that you should not waste time discussing the next trick of the Nobel Committee.
    1. good uncle 13 October 2015 08: 58 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Moreover, the "fighters" from literature very often turned out to be vile liars ...
  10. Gloomy Hedgehog 13 October 2015 07: 54 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Now it’s easiest to get a prize or a grant using this scenario:
    1. To get recognition or to be well covered in the Western media
    2. Be an ardent supporter of the spread of the American democracy
    3. And most importantly - to crap, crap and again crap on the Russian World.
    4. Go for the Nobel Prize.
  11. Dry_T-50 13 October 2015 08: 11 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Who is this such, this Alekseevich?
  12. Kolka82 13 October 2015 08: 39 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Sukhoy_T-50
    Who is this such, this Alekseevich?

    Well, if so, as you slightly changed her last name, turning it into a middle name, then she is
  13. Volzhanin 13 October 2015 08: 47 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Aunt is like in senility. Ugh! And they forgot.
  14. good uncle 13 October 2015 08: 56 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Shnobel Prize ??? where does her prestige come from ??? for me, so after the mess of deceit, he should have ended.
  15. Erg
    Erg 13 October 2015 08: 57 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Nothing. Time will pass, and such “svetlana” will decrease. Everything goes to this.
  16. akudr48 13 October 2015 09: 51 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    Lukashenko, who won the fifth time in the presidential election, is openly moving towards rapprochement with the European Union and the United States. It seems that he wants to fuck from Russia as much as possible. And this does not show any originality. This is exactly what Yanukovych did

    It’s hard to argue with this, just as I wouldn’t want the opposite for sofa marshals and generals.

    Lukashenko would be good as the President of a united Russia reunited with Belarus, but he would never be like that because of the stupidity and greed of the Russian ruling class.

    Therefore, the task of disloyalty and the drift to the West of Lukashenko or those who succeed him in the end, the solution to this problem, is to change the "effective owners", beneficiaries of the collapse of the USSR, in Moscow.
    1. shaman2001 13 October 2015 13: 26 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      He’s not going anywhere. He just wants to quietly, in contrast with the "bad" Putin, get rid of Western and American sanctions, which is generally correct, because in the economy of the Republic of Belarus it’s a matter of seams. He does not want to get into the market in full. But if you do nothing, then the country simply will not survive.
  17. lukewarm 13 October 2015 10: 02 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    B. Mussolini and A. Hitler were nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in 1935 and 1939. respectively. Predecessors of Obama. So to speak. And for the literary Nobel finally can be silent. The Nobel Prize is an instrument of influence of "civilized" countries and a way to express preferences by encouraging loyal followers. So objectivity there did not smell by definition, with the exception of perhaps, natural sciences. And even then, in order to show supposedly impartiality.
  18. Gormenghast 13 October 2015 10: 07 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    ... pulled us out of the romanticism of the 90s.


    What is she talking about? About unemployment, devastation, hunger, prostitution, banditry and rats on city streets (I saw it myself)?

    ... the people began to speak, and when he spoke, we were all scared


    What about this? Is it not too bold for Mr. Aleksievich (even to the Shnobel laureate) to assert that the whole PEOPLE is mistaken? So the people are not right, but is she right? And does this not mean that if the voice of the people turned out to be scary, then because something was done wrong; that the people did not forget the war of 92-99 (against the people) and is ready to present the bill to the overseas organizers of this war?
  19. anip 13 October 2015 10: 10 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    We were pleased to learn about the award of the Nobel Prize in Literature to the Belarusian writer Svetlana Aleksievich. Russian-language writer, a person, apparently, close to us in spirit.

    With joy??? Yes, look at her physics and surname. "God's chosen" nation rushing a mile away. Why rejoice?
    After I saw the news about her and herself on the TV screen, I tried to read one of her "works", namely, "Zink Boys" - this is some kind of turbidity from fragments of foggy thought, generously seasoned with ellipses. Guesses were justified one hundred percent.
  20. VD chauvinist 13 October 2015 11: 10 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Since I am an amateur in literature, I do not presume to judge the works of Mrs. Aleksievich. But I am firmly convinced that Sholokhov, Simonov, Stadnyuk, Bondarev, Rasputin, Tvardovsky - this series can be continued - not with you, the newly made Nobel, they are OUR and they are with US.
  21. sa-ag 13 October 2015 11: 11 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    "... But no one expected the return of the Soviet era, which was invading a country that was already trying to start a new life."

    Soviet era, now ??? She beguiled something, maybe in Belarus it somehow looks and looks, but not outside of it ...

    "... Previously, the ultimate goal was to preserve the empire, but I don’t know what the logic and motives of what is happening now"

    Well, and also a writer, everything is simpler and more prosaic, no "... and apple trees will bloom on Mars" - oil and gas business
  22. marna 13 October 2015 11: 19 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Something I missed, for what it the most significant literary work of an idealistic orientation(The Nobel Prize for Literature is awarded) The young lady received the prize. The most profitable business today is to scold Russia and teach us life.
  23. Grach710 13 October 2015 11: 27 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    That Makarevich, that Alekseevich, it makes no difference. To guess (the more the better) and cry over the fate of the unfortunate and deceived Russian people. This is the only way to get the Nobel Prize. hi
  24. ilyaches 13 October 2015 11: 29 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Finches
    ... then she really wanted to get the Nobel Prize ...


    Of course I wanted, if only a joke, almost the bucks.
  25. Buffalo 13 October 2015 11: 32 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    With all my heart it turns from this "corrupt girl of imperialism"! - Before they had time to put her hand in, a flood of barking mongrel scattered across Russia with the help of biased media.
    And if earlier in her publications the containment wrote more and more about menstruation for women in the war (“The war has no woman’s face”), but about how the mother strangled the baby with her own hands so that he wouldn’t give out the partisans who were standing in the reed thicket, now she puts forward purely political demands, in the interests of her master, strives to bite more painfully.
    And I remembered the lines of Sergei Yesenin, about another borosopisator, Demian Poor:

    And yet, when I read in Pravda
    The truth about Christ the lascivious Demian -
    I felt ashamed that I was
    Into vomit, spewed intoxicated.

    May Buddha, Moses, Confucius and Christ
    A distant myth - we understand this, -
    But still you can’t, like a year old dog,
    Barking at everything and everyone.

    No, you, Demian, did not offend Christ,
    You didn’t touch Him with your pen -
    The robber was, Judah was -
    You just lacked!

    You are a blood clot at the cross
    I dug my nostril like a fat hog,
    You just grunted at Christ
    Efim Lakeevich Pridvorov!

    / "Message" to the Evangelist "Demian" /
    http://www.100bestpoems.ru/item_info.php?id=14454
  26. Buffalo 13 October 2015 11: 33 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    People of the servile rank -
    Real dogs sometimes ...

    Jacob appeared so from his youth,
    Only Jacob had joy:
    Master, to cherish, to protect, to please ...

    / N.A. Nekrasov, "Who Should Live Well in Russia" /
  27. roskot 13 October 2015 13: 37 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    And the story is not worth a damn. In the 90s there was a shallow. To everyone. I rushed abroad. And there is no work with her profession. There are enough of them. They suggested pouring mud over Russia. I want to eat. I agreed. That would have been given to the Nobel. Apparently he will continue to slander further.
  28. Oleko 13 October 2015 16: 56 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    I read the book Aleksievich "The war does not have a female face" when I was a teenager (now 63 g). The book struck with its naturalism. I only remember how she described hand-to-hand combat in the trenches with the Germans. The crunch of breaking bones under the butts, inhuman screams She wrote that after the third melee people went crazy. Natalya Petrovna Bekhtereva (Kingdom of Heaven), academician, director of the Brain Institute of RAMS, said that cameramen, both German and Russian, went crazy after filming. This is that Alexievich.
    So where did this Aleksievich go? Where did Makarevich go, solo songs I have his whole disc and I’m not going to stomp him and throw him in the trash ... Where did Liechka Akhezhzhakova, a wonderful actress, who played more than one role in Ryazanov’s films go? What kind of dope is it in their heads that they don’t see the obvious? My wife, a native of Sevastopol, grew up and studied there, in 1974 she left for her husband in Baltiysk. Somehow having quarreled with her, I blurted out "It would be better if the Crimea would not have been attached if such women live there." About 15 minutes rang in my head (the handle of my little one is heavy, Every day I carry a portfolio of 6-7 kg for coordination, you know ...). When I laughed, we made ki to each other. The wife said the following: “Sevastopol’s never considered themselves Ukrainians. We absorbed the glory of Sevastopol. In 2008, I stood next to Gorodnitsky (wife of a poet and bard), when he performed“ Sevastopol will remain Russian, ”which was going on, you you can’t imagine. " When this bacchanalia began, all her friends went to cook for the militia. Helped than anyone than he could. Already then they said that if the PS enters Sevastopol, then he will enter the dead city. They will protect until the last person. And after this, Akhedzhakova asks for forgiveness from the possessed ISIS? Leah, don’t try to come to Baltiysk ... Makar calls us fools and cattle? Does Babyshka Aleksievich pour crocodile tears over the unfortunate RF?

    What is the matter with them?
  29. Mikhail3 13 October 2015 17: 53 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    She is the daughter of a Soviet military

    That is, the Nobel Prize, as it were, to all the "daughters of officers." In general, not everything is so simple ...
    In response to the timid sprouts of the awakening of Russian identity from the terrible, and even seemingly irreversible lethargy, increased pressure from the West. It is logical in general. And the use of traitors is very logical and expected. Computer texts that regularly appear on the network for our psycho-processing are very alien. You know ... with surprisingly correct spelling and punctuation, clear, balanced, neatly arranged ... dead like a stone in a sorting wall. According to all the laws of the American military psychological sciences, these texts should crush us, deprive us of an understanding of reality, stop, confuse ... nifiga does not work.
    So you have to bet on Alikseevich and others like her. Although the lyrics were junk, but at least alive, breathing, stupid and dumb, but real. Let them out. They will give the aunt money, we can get drunk, all the good.
  30. Vlad5307 13 October 2015 22: 52 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: rotmistr60
    Therefore, I think that you should not waste time discussing the next trick of the Nobel Committee.

    In the field of literature, this has long been the Shnobel Committee! laughing
  31. Buffalo 14 October 2015 07: 35 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Order of Judah, a kept woman and Mebel Prize, in addition!
  32. Buffalo 14 October 2015 07: 41 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Shnobel medal (copper), weight - 24 kg, for the borosyapisnitsa.