Nobel sanctioned schnobel

The Russian-language writer from Belarus Svetlana Aleksiyevich became the winner of the Nobel Prize in literature for 2015 year “a monument to the suffering and courage of our time” for polyphonic creativity. But in fact - for the wretched slander on Russia, in which not even the shadow of talent flashes.


Nobel sanctioned schnobel


Nobel laureates before were such Russian writers as Bunin, Pasternak, Sholokhov, Brodsky, Solzhenitsyn. Great, albeit to some extent, shocking creators - but what a genius without outrageous?

The “dark alleys” of Bunin became, of course, a sexual outrage for their time. But there was both the highest syllable and the artistic justification of this literary sedition. Phrases, crawling to the soul, to tears.

“Matrenin Yard” and “One Day of Ivan Denisovich” Solzhenitsyn - also shocking, but real literary works. And then let him release such nonsense as the "Gulag Archipelago" and "Red Wheel", it is still a writer with a capital letter. Well, reeled; well, fell under the conjuncture - with whom of the greats also does not happen!

Sholokhov in general received his Nobel Prize without the slightest equivalents to the western side, openly declaring: “I write at the behest of my heart, and my heart belongs to the Communist Party”. His "Silent Don" is a novel of novels both in language and in the immense depth of penetration into the soul of the people. Much stronger than the sugary "Gone With the Wind" Mitchell and even the harsh "Grapes of Wrath" by Steinbeck.

Brodsky is a great poet who understands. Very boring and abstruse in many of his verses - but the author of such pearls as the aesthetic "Elegy to John Donna" and the anti-aesthetic poem "Presentation", all from audacious shocking:

“They say the Plenum has opened.”
"He hit her between the eyes with a log."
"Above the Arab Peace Hut
The Yeld Parkhaty is proudly flying ... "
"He was a simple worker all his life."
"By the way, we all jerk off ..."


Pasternak, in addition to his outstanding love lyricism, also wrote outstanding epics, including such verses about Lenin:

He was like a lunge on the rapier.
Chasing after expressed,
He bent his jacket topyrya
And the front end of the sleeper.
Words could be about fuel oil,
But the hull is bending
Breathed flight bare essence
Break through the stupid layer of husk.
And this naked burr
Reporting out loud to everything
What was traced in blood:
He was their sound face ...
Centuries envy envious,
Jealous of their jealousy of one,
He ruled the flow of thought
And only because of the country.


Yes, the West found in all these writers a sign of Fronde - but the main reason for awarding them the Nobel Prize was their great and desperate literary gift.

And suddenly all this former luxury of the Nobel objectivity has broken overnight.

Aleksiyevich, the author of conjuncture-perestroika essays like “The war has a non-female face” and “Chernobyl prayer”, has no relation to fiction at all. She is an ordinary essayist, but an extraordinary social activist who contrived to grab the Lenin Komsomol Prize and a bunch of Western anti-Soviet and anti-Russian prizes. And charmed by the Nobel Committee, which has completely gone crazy with hatred of Russia, with its pearls:

"About Moscow and the DPRK
I recently returned from Moscow, found the May holidays there. I heard the orchestras rattling at night and Tanks on the pavement. The feeling that I was not in Moscow, but in North Korea.

About victory and emptiness
Millions burned in the fire of war, but in the permafrost of the GULAG, as well as in the land of our city parks and forests, there are also millions. Great Victory betrayed. She blocked Stalin's crimes from us. And now they use victory, so that no one will guess what kind of emptiness we are in.

Oh joy after returning Crimea
The rally for the victory in the Crimea gathered 20 thousand people with posters: “The Russian spirit is invincible!” “We will not give Ukraine to America!” “Ukraine, freedom, Putin”. Prayers, priests, banners, pathetic speeches - some kind of archaic. A squall of applause stood after a speech by one speaker: “All the key strategic objects were captured by Russian troops in the Crimea ...” I looked around: rage and hatred on faces.

About the feeling of life
One Italian restaurateur posted an ad "We do not serve the Russians." This is a good metaphor. Today the world is beginning to fear again: what is there in this pit, in this abyss, which has nuclear weapons, crazy geopolitical ideas and does not know the concept of international law.

About Russian people
We are dealing with a Russian man who has fought for almost 200 for the past 150 years. And never lived well. Human life is worth nothing to him, and the notion of greatness is not that a person should live well, but that the state should be large and packed with rockets. In this vast post-Soviet space, especially in Russia and Belarus, where the people of 70 have been deceiving, then another of 20 have been robbed, and very aggressive and dangerous people have grown up for the world.

About free life
Take a look at the Baltics - there is a completely different life today. It was necessary to consistently build the very new life that we talked about so much in the 90s. We so wanted a really free life, to enter this common world. And now what? Second hand full.

About Putin
And Putin seems to have come for a long time. Overthrown people in such a barbarism, such an archaic, medieval ...

About Maidan
There, in the Kremlin, they cannot believe that not a Nazi coup occurred in Ukraine, but a popular revolution. Fair ... "


Bunin has such an essay "Cursed Days", where he in black colors of hopeless doubts depicted the October Revolution. But, unlike Aleksiyevich, Bunin's soul ached for what he sincerely did not understand — all of this he sees through in his essay and vividly takes on the soul. And when he finally realized what it was about, years after 30 after his emigration, he went to the USSR Embassy to ask back to his homeland. Well, I did not interrogate him - and I died in a foreign land, breathing love for my motherland, which I left because of his complex feelings.

And for the current Nobel laureate, everything is simple: know yourself Russia is high - and you will be happy, and the foreign circulation of your poor books. And the Nobel Committee, descending to such a profound devaluation - from the fiery Bunin, the bright Pasternak and the immense Sholokhov to the dull Russophobe Aleksiyevich - puts a shameful cross on himself.

The Nobel Prize for Peace has already become essentially a Nobel Prize. In addition, there is a literary, becoming a reward for a naked hatred of Russia, without any creative embellishment. And the recognizable sanction schnobel is already sticking out of it.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

52 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Same lech 12 October 2015 07: 16 New
    • 23
    • 0
    +23
    The Nobel Peace Prize from a person who invented dynamite that killed millions of people on the planet .... this is duplicity, cynicism and mockery of the very nature of reason.

    I have a very negative attitude to the Nobel Peace Prize giving it to all rascals without a twinge of conscience.
    1. subbtin.725 12 October 2015 07: 28 New
      • 21
      • 0
      +21
      "About Moscow and the DPRK

      About Russian people

      About Putin

      In vain she is.
      And for the current Nobel laureate, everything is simple: know yourself high Russia - and you will be happy, and the foreign circulation of your wretched books.

      We say, Svetlana Aleksievich - we recall the “ECHO MSCWA” led by Venediktov and others like them. Everyone understands the criteria by which they give these handouts to the West: they want Russia, that means well done, fighters for bullshit.
      1. Karabanov 12 October 2015 08: 04 New
        • 23
        • 0
        +23
        Take a look at the Baltic states - today there is a completely different life. It was necessary to consistently build the very new life that we talked about so much in the 90s.

        Is she talking about this Baltic? Where are the former SS-ovsky degenerates honored?
        1. andj61 12 October 2015 08: 39 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Quote: Karabanov
          Is she talking about this Baltic? Where are the former SS-ovsky degenerates honored?

          Illustrative photo! And the Latvian flag here evokes associations with the Nazi: both this and that red with white, in Latvian a white stripe - on the Nazi - a white circle. In Latvian, only the swastika is not enough!
          1. Slobber 12 October 2015 09: 08 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            And the Latvian flag here causes associations with the Nazi

            And I have with the Austrian, is this normal?
            1. kotvov 12 October 2015 11: 08 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              And I have with the Austrian, is that normal ?,
              it’s not a matter of the flag, but of the policy pursued by the country. Some ss-eve are extolled, other accomplices, the third story is rewritten for the sake of oneself. I’m thinking of this.
            2. Weyland 12 October 2015 13: 26 New
              • 4
              • 0
              +4
              Quote: razgildyay
              I have with the Austrian, is that normal?


              Fine. For Hitler was born in Austria!
            3. The comment was deleted.
            4. ALEA IACTA EST 12 October 2015 18: 20 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: razgildyay
              And I have with the Austrian

              They didn’t have enough imagination, so they stole the flag from Austria. lol
      2. BMP-2 12 October 2015 10: 27 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        We say, Svetlana Aleksievich - remember
        (so to speak, inspired by the lyrics :):

        "Everyone sees what he is looking for,
        what he is teeming with - and so on ... "
      3. Belgorod 12 October 2015 11: 44 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        About Venediktov
        [media = http: // http: //www.youtube.com/watch? v = LJn63An7mKY]
        Well, that's awesome
        And here is completely
        [media = http: // http: //www.youtube.com/watch? v = MSKvGJmV5y4]
        It's an hour and a half. Look - you will not regret it !!!!
        Smeared the whole Maidan on the wall. He brought five maydanut magazines, they climbed onto the wall and fled from the studio. The editor freaked out, ran away and then called to the studio and tried to say something, and Venya wiped his feet on him
        They thought - Venia would be to blame Putin, and he tore them up like a hot-water bottle.
        And in the end, Putin gave MY PRESIDENT, and don’t dare to touch him with dirty Bandera paws (this is my free translation)
        Take a look. You will not regret!
        1. Same lech 12 October 2015 12: 14 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          And in the end, Putin gave MY PRESIDENT, and don’t dare to touch him with dirty Bandera paws (this is my free translation)
          Take a look. You will not regret!


          I did not expect this from him honestly ... I'm in shock.
          1. northern 13 October 2015 09: 05 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            And I was just expecting, and it was from him.
            Venya, along with the “Matzo’s ear”, is also a weather vane, repainted if necessary in the blink of an eye. As it became clear that no one will regret the fifth column, so immediately "Putin is his president." Despite the fact that his brainchild is still that anti-Russian serpentarium.
      4. Russian Uzbek 12 October 2015 12: 09 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        "" "And for the current Nobel laureate, everything is simple: know yourself high Russia - and you will be happy, and the foreign circulation of your wretched books" "
        so now it’s everywhere! write nasty things about Russia or worry about the "rights" p.i.d.o.d.o. and other perverts and you will be the Oscar and the Nobel Prize
    2. Mikado 12 October 2015 12: 42 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: The same Lech
      The Nobel Peace Prize from a person who invented dynamite that killed millions of people on the planet .... this is duplicity, cynicism and mockery of the very nature of reason.

      I have a very negative attitude to the Nobel Peace Prize giving it to all rascals without a twinge of conscience.


      It seems to me that the point is not who invented what, but how specific individuals use this invention in a particular case. When Kalashnikov died, the liberal party in all forums raised a howl a la "bastard, there he is dear, his invention killed so many people!" But he did create AK to protect his own people!

      By the way, personally, we can be grateful to Nobel. It was his naval mines (made by order of the Russian government) that minefields were laid out on the outskirts of Kronstadt during the Crimean War, which is why the huge squadron of impudent French did not even try to get close to it.

      And in awarding you are absolutely right hi
    3. Asadullah 12 October 2015 13: 54 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Nobel Peace Prize from a man who invented dynamite that killed millions of people on the planet ....


      The Nobel Peace Prize has nothing to do with the person who produced dynamite. By the way, very few people were killed by dynamite, mainly due to careless explosions in the mining industry, picric acid, TNT and gunpowder killed the most. Even with his talent of mind, Nobel could not understand why they give a peace prize. As for Aleksievich, she received a prize in literature, not in the world.

      As for the Nobel Committee, it has long ceased to be a world authority, and has become only one of the organs of propaganda of Western civilization. An engaged office, in which certain power circles of the Western world are played. In which for their active participation in the collapse of the geopolitical enemy, they can be appointed Honorary Saints, like Wojtylu. Such a boring fight between ethical pornography, where hypocrisy, the most harmless pripampas.
    4. northern 13 October 2015 09: 01 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: The same Lech
      The Nobel Peace Prize from a person who invented dynamite that killed millions of people on the planet .... this is duplicity, cynicism and mockery of the very nature of reason.

      So the winners of this award are directly relevant - Obama, Gorbachev
    5. tyler15 14 October 2015 07: 07 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Gorbachev - who destroyed millions of people in the USSR ... Obama - the most peaceful ruler in the whole world.
  2. Imperialkolorad 12 October 2015 07: 18 New
    • 13
    • 0
    +13
    Now the prize in literature and even more so in the world looks like the stigma of a degenerate and cynical of liars.
  3. aszzz888 12 October 2015 07: 21 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Same LEKHA (2) SU Today, 07: 16 New
    The Nobel Peace Prize from a person who invented dynamite that killed millions of people on the planet .... this is duplicity, cynicism and mockery of the very nature of reason.


    I agree.
    But no Nobel, so different, they would have come up with the same anyway.

    And the fact that all these awards are politicized, and they are led by those who foment war, is beyond any doubt.
    1. Weyland 12 October 2015 13: 29 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: aszzz888
      no Nobel, so different, anyway would have come up with such a thing.


      The question is - would this other institute a Peace Prize?
  4. kostyan77708 12 October 2015 07: 22 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    That’s how you have to give a kick under .. and send to where, in their opinion, it’s better to live without the right to return!
    1. iury.vorgul 12 October 2015 08: 25 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Sorry, I wanted to put "+", accidentally clicked on "-". And this Russophobia, by the way, constantly lives in France.
    2. northern 13 October 2015 09: 10 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: kostyan77708
      That’s how you have to give a kick under .. and send to where, in their opinion, it’s better to live without the right to return!

      Unfortunately, at the moment of history we do not have an institution of deprivation of citizenship. And so it would be worth some to send in free swimming. However, many rats have already liquidated themselves and disappeared from the horizon.
  5. venaya 12 October 2015 07: 29 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    “Matrenin Yard” and “One Day of Ivan Denisovich” Solzhenitsyn - also shocking, but real literary works. And then let him release such nonsense as the "Gulag Archipelago" and "Red Wheel", it is still a writer with a capital letter. Well, reeled; well, fell under the conjuncture - with whom of the greats also does not happen!
    ... know yourself high Russia - and you will be happy, and the foreign circulation of your wretched books.

    For a long time, the Nobel Prize has become a household name. The Nobel Committee itself has nothing to do with it, it is controlled like a tassel, forcing it to stick out something decent with outrageously indecent actions. They are not free people, but ordinary clerks of foreign power.
  6. Kos_kalinki9 12 October 2015 07: 30 New
    • 9
    • 0
    +9
    About free life
    Take a look at the Baltics - there is a completely different life today. It was necessary to consistently build the very new life that we talked about so much in the 90s. We so wanted a really free life, to enter this common world. And now what? Second hand full.

    Of course in sprat another life. There, even people are divided into citizens and not citizens. Democracy, damn it, freedom of choice.
    1. Semurg 12 October 2015 09: 20 New
      • -8
      • 0
      -8
      Quote: Kos_kalinki9
      About free life
      Take a look at the Baltics - there is a completely different life today. It was necessary to consistently build the very new life that we talked about so much in the 90s. We so wanted a really free life, to enter this common world. And now what? Second hand full.

      Of course in sprat another life. There, even people are divided into citizens and not citizens. Democracy, damn it, freedom of choice.

      why then the local Russians are not returning to the Russian Federation, and not even citizens are holding onto to life in the Baltic states? At the expense of the Nobel Prize, when Alferov received it, everyone wrote that they finally recognized the achievements of Russian science, and when Alex received it they wrote that it was a worthless and engaged prize. By the way, both Bunin and Solzhenitsyn and Pasternak were more than once branded by the authorities at the time, and devastating articles were published about their worthless work, as they are now squealing about Alex's work. Reading her book at war was not a woman’s face; for me, a good thing, though hard.
      1. Asadullah 12 October 2015 14: 18 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Reading her book at war was not a woman’s face; for me, a good thing, though hard.


        Do you know how many such “good” things are in the world? You don’t have enough to reread life. The question is not whether this aunt can write, the question is what she is awarded for, because behind her are hundreds of thousands who write better than her head. The author explained in a simple and easy-to-understand language, for which she was noticed and sipped. The factor was not her pen skill, but her citizenship and political position.

        Alferov received the prize only for the fact that his personal friends, titled scholars of world renown, wrote indignant letters to the Nobel Committee. that the person on whose works all the information devices of the world work. was not even considered there as a candidate. Thanks to this pressure, in general, independent and honest people, and among scientists there are not few, very few, Alferov became a laureate. So go deeper than the headlines.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  7. Shadowcat 12 October 2015 07: 30 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    As already said, if you put a ferrimagnet in Nobel’s hands and wrap it with copper wire, you get a good generator.
  8. afdjhbn67 12 October 2015 07: 30 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    I looked at the litmir of this now Nobel work .. I could not read some nonsense, the lure only in the title. It’s just time to rename this award to Shnobelevskaya .. It has become litmus paper for Russophobes.
  9. rotmistr60 12 October 2015 07: 33 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    in fact, for miserable slander to Russia, in which even a shadow of talent does not flicker.

    And what to expect from the west. If you want to bend in front of them - pour as much dirt on Russia as possible, you look and they will notice you. And not only will they notice, but also for the sake of Russophobia, they will also celebrate.
  10. cth; fyn 12 October 2015 07: 34 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Issue a book with 500 sheets or so that will only say: Russia is bad, maybe I’ll get a prize ... But a denyuzhka can be spent on good deeds.
  11. Neophyte 12 October 2015 07: 49 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    The hatred of Russia for this lady goes wild! I was not too lazy and revered her "opuses", to put it mildly, full of g ... oh and mediocrity! Yes, gentlemen, the Nobel became a Shnobelevka! The West is delighted with the appearance of a "light of thought" and therefore , another candidate: Frau Merkel - could not stand the competition!
  12. My address 12 October 2015 08: 03 New
    • 16
    • 0
    +16
    Great Solzhenitsyn?

    I do not agree. I was brought up on L. Tolstoy, London, Pushkin, Dickens, Chekhov, etc. In Solzhenitsyn decently written only the story "One Day ...". On a pull, in 70-x, took out the "Cancer Corps" and stunned unreadable. Then I tried something else and in the same way. It is quite likely the version of the literary processing of "One Day" by a real writer, attached to him by a girl, with whom he quarreled.
    I have a question for praising Solzhenitsyn - did you read it? Similarly, the "Doctor Zhevago" Pasternak, which, in my opinion, the average literature. And they did not print it foolishly in the USSR, otherwise they would have forgotten this book a year later.

    I am waiting for all the Nobel Prizes to be officially awarded "For contributions to the fight against Russia."
    1. afdjhbn67 12 October 2015 08: 34 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: My address
      Great Solzhenitsyn?

      I do not agree. I was brought up on L. Tolstoy, London, Pushkin, Dickens, Chekhov, etc. In Solzhenitsyn decently written only the story "One Day ...". On a pull, in 70-x, took out the "Cancer Corps" and stunned unreadable. Then I tried something else and in the same way. It is quite likely the version of the literary processing of "One Day" by a real writer, attached to him by a girl, with whom he quarreled.
      I have a question for praising Solzhenitsyn - did you read it? Similarly, the "Doctor Zhevago" Pasternak, which, in my opinion, the average literature. And they did not print it foolishly in the USSR, otherwise they would have forgotten this book a year later.

      I am waiting for all the Nobel Prizes to be officially awarded "For contributions to the fight against Russia."

      At Solzh I really could only read "One Day" .. I fully share your opinion.
  13. Name 12 October 2015 08: 08 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Very interest takes me apart, namely: Aleksievich voted for someone, because Lukashenko who congratulated her on October 11 said that "Russia is the closest country in Belarus, and there is no doubt about it." laughing
  14. Das Boot 12 October 2015 08: 22 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    literary Nobel in relation to Russian-speaking authors is awarded not for talent, but for position.
    "Zinc Boys" did not like. In general, it has always been a joke that the status of a Nobel laureate automatically makes an extraordinary writer an oracle and a prophet.
    1. EvgNik 12 October 2015 08: 43 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Das Boot
      the status of a Nobel laureate automatically makes an extraordinary writer of the oracle and prophet

      And automatically makes it unreadable from it.
      1. Das Boot 12 October 2015 09: 36 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: EvgNik
        And automatically makes it unreadable from it.

        nonsense. Booker and Nob arouse empirical interest in its owner.
  15. Rurikovich 12 October 2015 08: 26 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Personally, I only about this award and found out that we have Madame Aleksievich ... what And immediately there was no doubt about what she was writing about. For knowing the deceit, hypocrisy and adherence to double standards, we can safely say that she received this “approval” of the Geyropa by no means laudatory speeches by Lukashenko or Putin ... Most likely it was a kind of message before the elections, as well as the easing of the so-called sanctions and other gingerbread cookies who are trying to influence the situation in the country. Nobody is counting on the so-called opposition, which was put in the last election. So they try differently.
    My opinion is that this is an elementary policy that does not take into account the economy. How many times already I repeat that politics without an economy is an ordinary trepidation. And only a fool can believe that Europe will open its markets to our goods or begin to push money into the economy. Ukraine is an example of this. So everything will be as it was before. Positioning their multi-vector politics will make smiling faces west, but trade with the East. These are the realities of the location between the two great apologists with different values ​​- Russia and Geyropa. We have examples in the form of the Baltic states and Ukraine, so I have no doubt that I will choose the people and the leadership. Only if people can speak directly, then politicians have a hard time. That's why they are politicians lol I only judge matters from an economic point of view ...
    Personally, my opinion hi
  16. EvgNik 12 October 2015 08: 39 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    "" puts on itself a shameful cross ""
    The Nobel for literature, for politics - should not exist at all. That the cross is put on them, it is clearly read. Who have been in these categories over the past 25 years? Judah, betraying not only himself, but also his people. So the cross is set long ago.
  17. Gurtanchik 12 October 2015 08: 48 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    How many opportunistic lackeys and lackeys have divorced who for the sake of profit decide to smear their homeland with shit. And how they lovingly warm them over the hill. It becomes sick of such scum.
  18. SPIKER 12 October 2015 08: 48 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    God be her judge, this “laureate” !!! Surely, he lives not in Belarus, but somewhere on the Cote d'Azur ... it turned out, it turned out, it was necessary to mock in the direction of White Russia and Russia itself ... and this is the result - bucks in Yes! And the Nobel Prize is no longer the same, has turned into a handout for “hard work” against our world, especially in the nominations “Literature” and “For Peace.” Well, and after she was awarded a sheep a picture and say -there is nothing, no words - only matyuki !!!
  19. evil partisan 12 October 2015 09: 21 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    S. Aleksievich (from the latter): "Russians have always destroyed Belarusians." yes http://newsrbk.ru/news/2327038
    But during perestroika, my wife and I directly read her articles, short stories, stories, or whatever she wrote ... Just like Korotich, Bunich, Afanasyev. Every word was caught right ... Lord! How blind we were !! fool
    1. afdjhbn67 12 October 2015 10: 46 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: wicked partisan
      S. Aleksievich (from the latter): "Russians have always destroyed Belarusians." yes http://newsrbk.ru/news/2327038
      But during perestroika, my wife and I directly read her articles, short stories, stories, or whatever she wrote ... Just like Korotich, Bunich, Afanasyev. Every word was caught right ... Lord! How blind we were !! fool


      So if you were alone, I read and believed half the country .. and at that time the most advanced and active, they did us cool, I write and cry crying laughing
  20. ava09 12 October 2015 09: 34 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    (C) She is an ordinary essayist, but an outstanding social activist who managed to grab the Lenin Komsomol Prize and a bunch of Western anti-Soviet and anti-Russian prizes.

    "Both ours and yours, for the wafer we’ll dance with everything ..." When you think about such "laureates", it becomes, by and large, a pity for this old and soulless woman who was spiritually lowered.
    1. afdjhbn67 12 October 2015 10: 48 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: ava09
      (C) She is an ordinary essayist, but an outstanding social activist who managed to grab the Lenin Komsomol Prize and a bunch of Western anti-Soviet and anti-Russian prizes.

      "Both ours and yours, for the wafer we’ll dance with everything ..." When you think about such "laureates", it becomes, by and large, a pity for this old and soulless woman who was spiritually lowered.


      Read on the Echo - a delight turning into a squeal .. ghouls
  21. kasimsot 12 October 2015 10: 12 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    liter is not a science. it’s necessary for the benefit of all people to work with numbers and microbes, but I also know how to write, especially when there is a fence and someone else.
  22. VSkilled 12 October 2015 10: 13 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Not at all surprised.

    In the 90s, the West was sure that Russia could no longer rise: it was “breathing in the air”, a little more and the fate of the USSR would befall it.

    So, there was no sense in pretending to be a well-wisher, allegedly "sincerely wishing good on the path to the development of democracy". You could throw off the mask and call a spade a spade.

    At the same time, a documentary appeared on TV, in which the CIA curators openly said that they had the ability to influence all kinds of awards and ratings.

    I especially remembered the thought that IM was "purely on the drum" of the so-called literary value of the work. The main criterion was the thickness of the crap layer, with which the author tried to cover the "totalitarian regime".

    Here is the same picture. Another lambskin makes his modest Jewish business with the support of his fellow tribesmen from abroad.


    Conclusion: Madame Aleksievich is an ordinary glove doll worn by Uncle Sam in the next ideological war against Russia.

    Shnobelevka? Do not make me laugh. Schnobel is organized by Schnobels, mainly for Schnobels. Abamka, by the way - is also a "laureate", don’t you remember?

    "Fighter for peace," his mother ...
  23. press officer 12 October 2015 10: 45 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Well, yes .. Well, yes .. Shnobelevskaya is already 100%! Since it was even given to the organizers of the "jasmine revolution" in Tunisia! good Soon the IS will be issued, and then all blue-pink will begin to give! Ugh! What muck! angry
    Foreigners fell into the hands of something decent, they screwed everything up! fool
  24. Begemot 12 October 2015 10: 52 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    One thing is good, now Aleksievich at least has money, maybe he’s going to the hairdresser, to the cosmetic salon, otherwise it’s sickening to look at this kikimora, apparently, dirty thoughts tend to reflect on the appearance, almost vomited from its appearance. Abomination, Brrr, as I recall ...
  25. Andryukha G 12 October 2015 11: 06 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    This lady, after studying at the Belarusian BSU and working in the Soviet communist newspaper Mayak Kommunizma, was included in the denunciation of Soviet reality and since 2000 she had been living comfortably in European countries abroad, but she settled in the Belarusian capital again in 2013 (to be seen as her old sponsors, an order was prepared to prepare the overthrow "the last dictator of Europe"). Her photo has been hanging on opposition Belarusian websites sponsored by Poland and the USA over the past few years, and it is not surprising that this (notorious Russophobia) was nominated for a Nobel Prize, the choice of prize-winners of which is comparable to the victory of certain people in Eurovision.
  26. Gormenghast 12 October 2015 11: 17 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    I know Bunin, Pasternak, Sholokhov, Brodsky, even I read Solzhenitsyn.

    Who is Aleksievich - for the first time in my life I hear. What would that mean?
    1. dropout 12 October 2015 22: 59 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Gormengast
      Who is Aleksievich - for the first time in my life I hear. What would that mean?


      Do not worry, I have not read it either, and I dare to assure you, we are far from alone.
  27. Djozz 12 October 2015 11: 20 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    What is the debate about, a primitive graphomaniac and adaptation, ready for a little money to lie under anyone, the second Akhedzhakova in appearance and habits! He imagines himself to be the salt of the earth and the conscience of the people, but in fact G.A.vno. (C)
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  28. Buffalo 12 October 2015 12: 07 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    With all my heart it turns from this "corrupt girl of imperialism"! - Before they had time to put her hand in, a flood of barking mongrel scattered across Russia with the help of biased media.
    And if earlier in her publications the containment wrote more and more about menstruation for women in the war (“The war has no woman’s face”), but about how the mother strangled the baby with her own hands so that he wouldn’t give out the partisans who were standing in the reed thicket, now she puts forward purely political demands, in the interests of her master, strives to bite more painfully.
    And I remembered the lines of Sergei Yesenin, about another borosopisator, Demian Poor:

    And yet, when I read in Pravda
    The truth about Christ the lascivious Demian -
    I felt ashamed that I was
    Into vomit, spewed intoxicated.

    May Buddha, Moses, Confucius and Christ
    A distant myth - we understand this, -
    But still you can’t, like a year old dog,
    Barking at everything and everyone.

    No, you, Demian, did not offend Christ,
    You didn’t touch Him with your pen -
    The robber was, Judah was -
    You just lacked!

    You are a blood clot at the cross
    I dug my nostril like a fat hog,
    You just grunted at Christ
    Efim Lakeevich Pridvorov!

    / "Message" to the Evangelist "Demian" /
    http://www.100bestpoems.ru/item_info.php?id=14454
  29. Buffalo 12 October 2015 12: 25 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    People of the servile rank -
    Real dogs sometimes

    Jacob appeared so from his youth,
    Only Jacob had joy:
    Master, to cherish, to protect, to please ...

    / N.A. Nekrasov, "Who Should Live Well in Russia" /
  30. CONTROL 12 October 2015 12: 28 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    ... So, by the way: the place of birth of the "writer from Belarus" is Ivano-Frankivsk, the most that there is a Bandera nest in western Ukraine ... and the corresponding family ...
    And you all thought, what do grebes grow on? On pure manure - on it, darling ...
  31. Epifan 12 October 2015 12: 54 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    It is clear that the work of Aleksievich clearly did not even stand next to the work of Pasternak or Brodsky, and in the same Russia or Belarus there are much more talented writers. But, if the stars are lit, then this is definitely someone really needs. And we get from the Nobel Committee a classic version of Ostap Bender - "Homer, Milton and Panikovsky." Bravo!
    Everything is in place. It’s immediately clear where the snobel grows from.
    http://oleglurie-new.livejournal.com/261455.html
  32. Igor Polovodov 12 October 2015 13: 13 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    too much honor is a pug!
  33. Wolka 12 October 2015 13: 51 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    after all this, the Nobel’s losing all meaning, first Obama, whose hands are in blood, an award for peace, now an award in literature of a certain mediocrity that blasphemes Russia, but has not created anything brilliant or grandiose in world literature ...
    1. WUA 518 12 October 2015 14: 24 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      It seemed to me alone?
      1. Mikado 12 October 2015 14: 41 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        One field of berries. I don’t even want to swear.
  34. The comment was deleted.
  35. Thomas 12 October 2015 16: 24 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    About the prize laughing
    1. Gormenghast 12 October 2015 18: 36 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      The plot is excellent laughing You can’t do without a Nobel Prize.

      Where is Sholokhov with some kind of "Quiet Don".
  36. Thomas 12 October 2015 16: 26 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    I enclose the cover
  37. Conn 12 October 2015 17: 03 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Even the operating instructions for the washing machine have more artistic value than the “prose” of this Russophobic metiska!
  38. Goldmitro 12 October 2015 17: 37 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The Nobel Peace Prize has already become essentially a Shnobel Prize. In addition, the literary comes, becoming a reward for naked hatred of Russia, without any creative embellishment.

    A tendency has long been revealed that makes the choice of the Nobel Committee predictable that the more stupid Russophobia, the more primitive anti-Russian stench that comes to hysteria, the more likely the chances of a Nobel Prize!
  39. ALEA IACTA EST 12 October 2015 18: 18 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    A lot of attention to some kind of flea. The news of some drunken brawl in some Saransk would deserve more attention.
  40. palm 12 October 2015 21: 31 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The author of this opinion seems to be outraged not so much by the quality of the works of the laureate as by the political views of the latter. Zero tolerance and zero tolerance for a different opinion. You might think other laureates were Russophiles. Let the Kremlin give Ts. Abramovich a prize to establish the Abramovich Prize and give it to Tsar Vladimir Vladimirovich first.
  41. Vasisualiy 13 October 2015 00: 01 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    That's right, from the Nobel Prize there was only a snobel of "instant anti-war defenders" and hairy donkey ears of mattress covers.
    I do not believe in this award for a long time, since then, when it was given to one humpbacked Judah.
  42. Buffalo 13 October 2015 18: 46 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Shnobelevsky medal for the kept woman of the West, Aleksievich.