Military Review

North Korean missiles against the Patriot Saudi complexes

44
According to the French edition of TTU, which refers to South Korean intelligence, the DPRK delivered a number of Hwasong 6 ballistic missiles to Yemen’s Hussits (Ansar Allah group), some of which were used by rebels in June at Saudi troops located in Najran and in the area of ​​the air base in King Khaled.


Hwasong 6 tactical missile at a parade in Pyongyang

"The Saudi Patriot SAMs were able to intercept only 40% of the 20 P-17 / Hwasong 6 missiles launched until today," the publication quotes the blog. bmpd. “At the same time, Riyadh is sure that the launched rockets were obtained by Hussites not from North Korea, but delivered by Iran.”

According to TTU, recently, “Saudi Arabia appealed to the United States and received consent to purchase 600 missiles of the Patriot PAC-3 complex under a contract worth 5,4 billion dollars, which also includes training and telemetry missiles, simulators, a service system, and personnel training” etc.
Photos used:
http://www.flickr.com
44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Kos_kalinki9
    Kos_kalinki9 10 October 2015 10: 36 New
    27
    So so so. Saud adult got? Reached by investing in terrorists?
    1. Eugene-Eugene
      Eugene-Eugene 10 October 2015 10: 45 New
      12
      Saud on an adult has become?
      1. Temples
        Temples 10 October 2015 11: 06 New
        14
        According to TTU, recently “Saudi Arabia turned to the United States and agreed to purchase 600 Patriot PAC-3 missiles under a contract worth $ 5,4 billion,


        Received consent! What is going on with the world of reporters and magazines!
        The seller gives the buyer consent to the purchase!
        But where does he (the seller) get to fuck!
        The seller carries money of 5,4 billion !!! and he sees whether he agrees !!!
        Well, they say, they persuaded me to take money from you.
        Да все эти войны лишь для того что бы клепать эти ракеты безостановочно и продавать. Война в пределах собственного бытия этим "хозяевам жизни" не нужна. Война нужна где-то подальше, но нужна ОБЯЗАТЕЛЬНО!!!
        With the money raised from the war, they buy yachts, islands and countries with slaves and journalists, who then creep in front of the owner and work to create another conflict on the planet!

        And the Russians are to blame anyway! wassat
        1. alone
          alone 10 October 2015 11: 46 New
          11
          Quote: Temples
          Received consent! What is going on with the world of reporters and magazines!
          The seller gives the buyer consent to the purchase!
          But where does he (the seller) get to fuck!
          The seller carries money of 5,4 billion !!! and he sees whether he agrees !!!


          ))А зачем удивляетесь?Буквально пару дней назад журналист здесь в статье задает вопрос отставному военному летчику из Сирии вопрос,был ли имитация воздушного боя между СУ-30 ВКС РФ и F-15 ВВС Израилья,а он утверждает что не было.Вы не поверите статью завалили плюсами,и все форумчане хлопали в ладоши кричали ура.Только никто не удосужился задать себе вопрос:"Как мог узнать отставной сирийский летчик что происходило на воздухе между израильскими и российскими самолетами.
          P.S.Lately, the editors of the site completely forgot their editorial responsibilities. Fake on fake, errors after errors.
    2. HAM
      HAM 10 October 2015 10: 47 New
      +2
      Если за саудитов возьмутся "по-взрослому",то им никакие "патриоты" с "хищниками" не помогут-бравые только со свадьбами..
      1. spiriolla-45
        spiriolla-45 10 October 2015 11: 00 New
        +4
        Yes, it would not be bad to get the Saudi termite mound up, you see, and oil prices will rise.
        1. Basarev
          Basarev 10 October 2015 12: 28 New
          +3
          And if you throw off all the husks of the modifications with a file, it will surely turn out that in fact these new North Korean missiles are nothing more than the same old Scud in a new candy wrapper, nothing more. They even say that their newest and most modern ICBM Tephodon-3 flies on the same hitch of Skad engines.
          1. Altona
            Altona 10 October 2015 13: 04 New
            0
            Quote: Basarev
            And if you throw off all the husks of the modifications with a file, it will surely turn out that in fact these new North Korean missiles are nothing more than the same old Scud in a new candy wrapper, nothing more. They even say that their newest and most modern ICBM Tephodon-3 flies on the same hitch of Skad engines.

            ------------------------
            Не знай, батенька, какой там топливный бак прилеплен...Может могут летать дальше заявленных характеристик...Наш "Калибр" тоже считали 300 км по прямой, а летела 1500 км до цели по сложному маршруту да еще с огибанием поверхности...
        2. Altona
          Altona 10 October 2015 13: 01 New
          0
          Quote: spiriolla-xnumx
          Yes, it would not be bad to get the Saudi termite mound up, you see, and oil prices will rise.

          ------------------
          The Sauds also have no business ... The national piggy bank is melting fast, incomes are not enough to support the eternal holiday of luxury ...
      2. stonks
        stonks 10 October 2015 18: 21 New
        +2
        Patriot is weak against ballistic missiles.
        I have read for a long time that the percentage of goals captured by the patriots is worthless. Here, real military operations confirm this.
  2. aszzz888
    aszzz888 10 October 2015 10: 36 New
    +3
    The advertised Patriot, in fact, is nothing more than costly Pentagon advertising.
  3. Talgat
    Talgat 10 October 2015 10: 39 New
    10
    If this is really the case, then my applause from the resolute North Korea and the resolute Iranians!

    Вот это "пинок" под толстый зад жирных саудитов средневековых мракобесов

    In general, all these Saudis and Qatari are alive only from behind the roof of the United States - there will be another weight distribution in world geopolitics - and the Iranians will deal with them in two ways
    1. Eugene-Eugene
      Eugene-Eugene 10 October 2015 10: 55 New
      +8
      my applause resistant DPRK

      You must applaud the power next to the DPRK.
    2. zyablik.olga
      zyablik.olga 10 October 2015 11: 33 New
      +4
      Quote: Talgat
      If this is really the case, then my applause from the resolute North Korea and the resolute Iranians!

      Unfortunately this is fake. No.
  4. jaguarstas
    jaguarstas 10 October 2015 10: 41 New
    +4
    Пора бы Саудам поплатиться за все то зло, что они принесли своим соседям. В хорошей компании за такое поведение давно бы уже устроили "темную". Но "это ж памятник, кто его посадит!" (с)
  5. demon1978
    demon1978 10 October 2015 10: 41 New
    +5
    At the same time, Riyadh is sure that the launched missiles were received by the Khusts not from North Korea, but delivered by Iran. ”

    Just like:
    -You took seeds from aunt, from Aunt Nyura ???
    -Not at the woman Klava, she sits closer and pours with a hill !!!
  6. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 10 October 2015 10: 43 New
    +8
    Patriot is a normal modern air defense system. Like the c300. The question is in whose hands she is. Here we must ask the question, how are the Arabs fighting? Running Scud is not difficult, it is difficult to get out of it. It’s more difficult to shoot down, but if a projectile flies into the desert of which in Arabia 80% of the territory, then why shoot it down. And most likely the Arabs do not know how to use the technology and this is a fact!
    1. Kos_kalinki9
      Kos_kalinki9 10 October 2015 10: 52 New
      0
      Quote: Zaurbek
      Patriot is a normal modern air defense system. Like the c300. The question is in whose hands she is. Here we must ask the question, how are the Arabs fighting? Running Scud is not difficult, it is difficult to get out of it. It’s more difficult to shoot down, but if a projectile flies into the desert of which in Arabia 80% of the territory, then why shoot it down. And most likely the Arabs do not know how to use the technology and this is a fact!

      Are you not sure that a local gunner will appear in Yemen with the name Abdullah and the name YN, or PARK?
      1. Zaurbek
        Zaurbek 11 October 2015 15: 56 New
        0
        Как говорил товарищ Сталин:"кадры решают все!" ..и кому это нужно. И все может быть.
    2. kil 31
      kil 31 10 October 2015 10: 55 New
      +1
      At the same time, Riyadh is sure that the launched missiles were received by the Khusts not from North Korea, but delivered by Iran. ” It’s clear that Iran. The Saudis have long been begging for Islamabad a filling for their ballistic missiles. While they have an agreement, we will set when Riyadh will have a hopeless situation. So they escalate the situation.
    3. igor67
      igor67 10 October 2015 10: 58 New
      +4
      Quote: Zaurbek
      Patriot is a normal modern air defense system. Like the c300. The question is in whose hands she is. Here we must ask the question, how are the Arabs fighting? Running Scud is not difficult, it is difficult to get out of it. It’s more difficult to shoot down, but if a projectile flies into the desert of which in Arabia 80% of the territory, then why shoot it down. And most likely the Arabs do not know how to use the technology and this is a fact!

      Maybe they can, or maybe not, maybe you're right because the desert takes 80%, it’s worth shooting down, all the more likely the complex calculates the flight path, and yet Patriot has one advantage, and this is a fact: which was not what, but the military use was , the most distant Syrian plane shot down last year, well, in 90 a couple of Scuds
  7. vit
    vit 10 October 2015 10: 49 New
    +3
    yes, the warriors of them are still those ... there is a lot of noise and show-offs, little use. more or less they can fight only with the wrong hands, well, they can scoff at the prisoners, and there’s only one zilch, not warriors.
  8. Nymp
    Nymp 10 October 2015 10: 50 New
    +1
    Если прототип даже старых наших ракет справился с "патриотом"... ну какая разница в чьих руках оружие при этом? Иранцы тоже какбы не своим оружием умыли!
  9. hartlend
    hartlend 10 October 2015 10: 53 New
    +2
    По сообщению французского издания TTU, ссылающегося на южнокорейскую разведку, КНДР поставила йеменским хуситам (группе "Ансар Аллах") некоторое количество баллистических ракет Hwasong 6.

    A good start for an article about missiles would be easier to write - one grandmother said.

    intercept only 40% of the 20 missiles launched to date

    Why confuse interest and things, you can just write 8 out of 20 missiles. A purely Western manner of presenting information to confuse everyone.
  10. Vladimir 1964
    Vladimir 1964 10 October 2015 10: 54 New
    +6
    According to the French edition of TTU, which refers to South Korean intelligence, the DPRK delivered a number of Hwasong 6 ballistic missiles to Yemen’s Hussits (Ansar Allah group), some of which were used by rebels in June at Saudi troops located in Najran and in the area of ​​the air base in King Khaled.


    Интересная новость, но все таки больше похожа на фейк или "отжим" деньжат на "Пэтриот". Для пуска Hwasong 6, кроме машины (ПУ) изображенной на фотографии необходимы ещё несколько транспортных средств, пункт управления, подготовки к запуску и т.д. и т. п. Скрытно переместить все это хозяйство достаточно сложно в современных условиях. Да и после первого же пуска саудиты подняли бы ор на весь мир, а тут 20! пусков и лишь просьба по "Пэтриотам". Вспомним пуски "Скадов" в Ираке, сколько было разговоров и документальных подтверждений, а здесь?

    One can’t believe it, Dear colleagues. winked hi
  11. Mera joota
    Mera joota 10 October 2015 10: 54 New
    +2
    If so, how many targets were destroyed by Husit rockets?
  12. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 10 October 2015 11: 00 New
    +1
    Not like the truth. Why do Hussites need such missiles? It would be easier for them. Is it possible that it is a bit of a sandal in Riyadh, but this has not yet been heard. No, an obvious fake.
  13. Polite Moose
    Polite Moose 10 October 2015 11: 04 New
    +1
    Даже если предположить, что новость - не фейк, не могу не заострить внимание на той детали, что все "сообщальщики" о поставках этих ракет в Йемен обвиняют в этом своих традиционных, так сказать "оппонентов". Южная Корея обвиняет Северную, СА обвиняет Иран. Если бы спросили мнение у хохло-СМИ, то и к бабке не ходи, поставщика назвали бы 100%.
    Успокаивает молчание по этому поводу китайского агентства "Синьхуа", т.к. скорее всего этих поставок не было "Ни ..."
  14. traveler
    traveler 10 October 2015 11: 06 New
    -7
    the Hussites have no chance against the Saudis, they can bite, but no more. weight categories are different.
    but Iran, with its actions, is pushing its neighbors more and more to the transition from the Cold War to the Hot War. and the coalition looms not a gift - KSA, Israel, Turkey. the Arabians have loot, the Turks and Jews have agents, weapons and instructors, and those who want to partisan against the Persian government will not be hard to find - even Azeri, even Balochi, and Iranian Kurds can be wound through the same barzani.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 10 October 2015 11: 09 New
      +4
      Quote: traveler
      . and the coalition looms not a gift - KSA, Israel, Turkey. it’s easy for Arabians to have loot, for Turks and Jews, agents and instructors, and those who want to partisan against the Persian government will not be hard to find - even Azeri, even Balochi, and Iranian Kurds can be wound

      Are you by any chance not the US ambassador? I haven’t read big bullshit for a long time.
      1. traveler
        traveler 10 October 2015 12: 06 New
        +1
        it’s not by chance that the ambassador didn’t dump me such a sinecure.
        why bullshit? Am I wrong somewhere?
  15. kot stepan
    kot stepan 10 October 2015 11: 14 New
    +2
    Once upon a time, it was necessary to deliver two nuclear strikes without any announcement of the show - the first against Qatar, the second against Saudi Arabia (excluding only Mecca and Madina from the list of attacked targets); On major cities in oil and gas fields, infrastructure, etc.
    And in the Middle East peace and tranquility would have been established for a long time.
    Yes, I’m bad and I don’t feel sorry for them at all - I remember and understand how much blood they drank.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 10 October 2015 11: 18 New
      0
      Цитата: kot stepan
      Once upon a time, it was necessary to deliver two nuclear strikes without any announcement of the show - the first in Qatar, the second in Saudi Arabia (

      Given the development of events, we will soon apply not 2, but 222, and not only on them. Only it will not matter much.
  16. Mera joota
    Mera joota 10 October 2015 11: 16 New
    +1
    Жуткая лажа. Самое интересное все ссылаются на сайте /www.ttu.fr статьи на которую все ссылаются "Patriot contre SCUD" нет.
    The Saudis wrote about the launch of the SCADs and the fact that the Hussites launched two missiles that were successfully intercepted by the Patriots.
  17. Arkan
    Arkan 10 October 2015 11: 20 New
    +2
    “The Saudi Patriot air defense systems were able to intercept only 40% of the 20 R-17 / Hwasong 6 missiles launched to date,” the bmpd blog quotes the publication. “At the same time, Riyadh is confident that the launched missiles were received by the Khusts not from North Korea, but delivered by Iran.”


    Верблюжатникам достается не по детски, это им не постановочные верблюжьи бега, где верблюд короля всегда чемпион, демократия у них такая. Фуфло эти "патриоты" и их обслуга то же. Этим гаремным воинам что ни дай, все равно не в тему.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Mera joota
      Mera joota 10 October 2015 11: 32 New
      +1
      Quote: Arkan
      Camels are not childish

      You are in the know to see ... And how many Hussites fired Skud missiles on the Saudis?
  18. Dr dron
    Dr dron 10 October 2015 11: 24 New
    +5
    Quote: aszzz888
    The advertised Patriot, in fact, is nothing more than costly Pentagon advertising.

    Of course, I understand that our trains are the most train trains in the world. But what, do you personally know specifically about the patriot? About his guidance system, range of detection and destruction, of what installations the SAM consists of, how to counteract it ... to say that? Damn, well, already tired of reading these amateurish sayings!
    1. figvam3
      figvam3 10 October 2015 11: 28 New
      +1
      DRON, if you are such a great connoisseur of American weapons, then enlighten us, you probably know his technical data not on Wikipedia, but YOU USED THIS SYSTEM YOURSELF ??? Well, tell us please !!! YOU ARE NOT A DEALER ??? Wikipedia ONLY DO NOT retell
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Mera joota
        Mera joota 10 October 2015 11: 49 New
        +1
        Quote: fig3
        Well, tell us please !!!

        Here it is necessary to proceed from the veracity of the information specified in the article. To begin with, no article cited by the source exists. All this is sucked from the finger (or worse). Think for yourself. Why would the Hussites buy Scuds from the Koreans? Why the hell did they surrender to them? The accuracy of the R-17 complex missiles differs little from the German Fau-2, they only shoot at large cities with chemical stuffing or nuclear warheads. Of course, you can try to get Scud at a military base, but the probability of causing any damage is close to zero. Well, some of the militants need to be trained to use this bandura ... Husits ​​are easier to buy with this money and grenade launchers, which is much more productive.

        PS: The Hussites, according to the Saudis, made two launches by the Scuds, which were captured in the warehouses of the Yemeni army, but both missiles (again from the words of the Saudis) were intercepted. The Hussites themselves did not say anything about Scud.
    2. figvam3
      figvam3 10 October 2015 11: 31 New
      0
      Missile defense mode

      He needs a special satellite in orbit. This satellite must inform [17] in advance to the PATRIOT location station the coordinates of the rocket and its flight path [18]. It takes as much as 90 seconds. (almost 10 times longer than the S-400). THAT IS WHAT THE FAVORITE WIKIPEDIA IS TO US
      IF YOU ARE A BIG KNOWLEDGE AND NOT A TRAVELER, TELL US TO US, JUST DO NOT QUOTE Wikipedia, I UNDERSTAND YOU PERSONALLY KNOW ABOUT THIS COMPLEX NOT BY HEARING ??? PERSONALY TO SAY THIS FROM IT WAS AFFECTED ??? At the end of the war, disputes began in the USA about the effectiveness of the Patriot complex. Critics have sometimes claimed such low accuracy of interception as 25% in Saudi Arabia and 33% in Israel. Advocates indicated very high efficiency.
      So, representatives of the US Army published data on 80% of successful interception in Saudi Arabia and 50% in Israel
      1. Amurets
        Amurets 10 October 2015 12: 36 New
        +2
        3! And what do you dislike about Wikipedia. At the end of the article there are always links to sources from which these or other materials are taken and, in most cases, you can find in-depth material from the link. You probably trust the rocket technology website. So, increasing the firing range from 300km from KVO 450m to 900km KVO increased to 3000m. And now tell me why I need to spend an expensive missile defense missile if the target goes on a miss. It is known that the nuclear warhead is not responsible and will not be damaged. And who told you that with missile guidance needs a satellite. Data from a satellite is needed when an adversary uses strategic missile weapons in the early detection and analysis of the flight path of a target.
  19. Zai pali
    Zai pali 10 October 2015 11: 38 New
    +1
    The Saudis will still get theirs.
    1. alone
      alone 10 October 2015 11: 47 New
      0
      Цитата: Zai Pali
      The Saudis will still get theirs.

      Is it really from you?))) wink
      1. Zai pali
        Zai pali 10 October 2015 14: 16 New
        +1
        Well, not from Australia, we are no warriors drinks . But their enemies are only arriving.
  20. Dr dron
    Dr dron 10 October 2015 11: 42 New
    +1
    Quote: fig3
    DRON, if you are such a great connoisseur of American weapons, then enlighten us, you probably know his technical data not on Wikipedia, but YOU USED THIS SYSTEM YOURSELF ??? Well, tell us please !!! YOU ARE NOT A DEALER ??? Wikipedia ONLY DO NOT retell

    Все, что вам положено знать, вы уже прочитали в вики ))) Ну серьезно, без обид. Вас евреи и прочь, разводят и вы им все выкладываете на блюдечке с синей коемочкой. Не раз наблюдал на многих сайтах, как тщеславные люди, в попытках "вовзвыситься" выкладывают свои знания, которые, может быть составляют некоторую степень секретности. Ну не будьте такими наивными... Враг не дремлет)))
    PS still a patriot, a rather serious complex, do not underestimate it ...
    1. Kos_kalinki9
      Kos_kalinki9 10 October 2015 15: 05 New
      +1
      Quote: Dr Dron
      Quote: fig3
      DRON, if you are such a great connoisseur of American weapons, then enlighten us, you probably know his technical data not on Wikipedia, but YOU USED THIS SYSTEM YOURSELF ??? Well, tell us please !!! YOU ARE NOT A DEALER ??? Wikipedia ONLY DO NOT retell

      Все, что вам положено знать, вы уже прочитали в вики ))) Ну серьезно, без обид. Вас евреи и прочь, разводят и вы им все выкладываете на блюдечке с синей коемочкой. Не раз наблюдал на многих сайтах, как тщеславные люди, в попытках "вовзвыситься" выкладывают свои знания, которые, может быть составляют некоторую степень секретности. Ну не будьте такими наивными... Враг не дремлет)))
      PS still a patriot, a rather serious complex, do not underestimate it ...
  21. Seneca
    Seneca 10 October 2015 12: 06 New
    +1
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    Цитата: kot stepan
    Once upon a time, it was necessary to deliver two nuclear strikes without any announcement of the show - the first in Qatar, the second in Saudi Arabia (

    Given the development of events, we will soon apply not 2, but 222, and not only on them. Only it will not matter much.

    И чего вы так соседей и близких ненавидите или уже бункеров для всех накопали. Что то частенько начинает проскакивать среди "урашек". Вас бы в обычном бункере подержать хотя бы трое суток чтобы вы поняли все на что вы хотите обречь своих окружающих.
  22. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 10 October 2015 12: 12 New
    0
    Да, лепота. Новейшие ЗРК "Патриот" Самой Великой Державы не могут перехватить слегка модернизированные древнейшие советские ракеты. Что там говорить о "Калибрах" и, тем более, об ужасных "Ярсах" и "Рубежах".
    1. Zai pali
      Zai pali 10 October 2015 14: 23 New
      0
      The American military industry is redeployed to offensive weapons. Yars and Frontiers if they fly, then I'm afraid there will be no one to stop them. But Iskander is a great weapon. Why Russia does not leave the agreement on medium-range missiles is a mystery to me.
  23. Wolka
    Wolka 10 October 2015 16: 03 New
    0
    I don’t like this Saudi triangle for a long time ...
    1. Mikhalych 70
      Mikhalych 70 10 October 2015 23: 23 New
      0
      Maybe we fuck ?! belay
  24. Old26
    Old26 10 October 2015 17: 15 New
    +4
    Quote: Gormengast
    Да, лепота. Новейшие ЗРК "Патриот" Самой Великой Державы не могут перехватить слегка модернизированные древнейшие советские ракеты. Что там говорить о "Калибрах" и, тем более, об ужасных "Ярсах" и "Рубежах".


    I’ll tell you another terrible secret. Even two.

    FIRST SCARY SECRET.
    "Пэтриот" не сможет перехватить и минометную мину, выпущенную из 120-мм миномета.

    SECOND SCARY SECRET.
    The newest Russian S-400 complex and even the promising S-500 will not be able to intercept the same mortar mine ...

    Damn, this is a site MILITARY REVIEW or some bunch of stuff? It looks like the second

    Можно узнать, с какого Х.Р.ЕНА "Пэтриот" должен перехватывать "Ярсы "
    и "Рубежи"???? Или написать более нечего?? Комплекс, предназначен для перехвата ракет типа "Точка", "Лэнс" и близких к ним. Дальность перехвата порядка 100 км. Причем здесь МБР?????
    Даже "СКАД" не для него. В первой войне в Заливе его использовали из-за отсутствия чего-то другого. По принципу - "на безрыбье и рак рыба". То же самое сейчас в СА.

    I agree with those who wrote, and what for, to intercept a missile, which not only has a 3 km KVO, and carries a head half to three times smaller than the Soviet original ... Or do you need to shoot, even if it flies past? What for? Spend millions of missiles to intercept junk ??? After all, she does not shoot at vital points. Yemenis have only 6 SCAD launchers with ammunition of 33 missiles. If something remains, then a little. Let them shoot
  25. Fight cat
    Fight cat 10 October 2015 22: 28 New
    0
    that’s who benefits from the war on the Arabian Peninsula, it’s the Amerikos, the money earned from weapons !! laughing
  26. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 11 October 2015 18: 45 New
    0
    A rocket flies along a ballistic trajectory and is easy to calculate. The PAC 3 flight speed is enough to intercept the SCAD missile. The only gripe is that the SCAD missile warhead is not destroyed, it flies further and is undermined. In the conditions of shooting at a megalopolis, this becomes critical.