North Korean missiles against the Patriot Saudi complexes

44
According to the French edition of TTU, which refers to South Korean intelligence, the DPRK delivered a number of Hwasong 6 ballistic missiles to Yemen’s Hussits (Ansar Allah group), some of which were used by rebels in June at Saudi troops located in Najran and in the area of ​​the air base in King Khaled.

Hwasong 6 tactical missile at a parade in Pyongyang

"The Saudi Patriot SAMs were able to intercept only 40% of the 20 P-17 / Hwasong 6 missiles launched until today," the publication quotes the blog. bmpd. “At the same time, Riyadh is sure that the launched rockets were obtained by Hussites not from North Korea, but delivered by Iran.”

According to TTU, recently, “Saudi Arabia appealed to the United States and received consent to purchase 600 missiles of the Patriot PAC-3 complex under a contract worth 5,4 billion dollars, which also includes training and telemetry missiles, simulators, a service system, and personnel training” etc.
  • http://www.flickr.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +27
    10 October 2015 10: 36
    So so so. Saud adult got? Reached by investing in terrorists?
    1. +12
      10 October 2015 10: 45
      Saud on an adult has become?
      1. +14
        10 October 2015 11: 06
        According to TTU, recently “Saudi Arabia turned to the United States and agreed to purchase 600 Patriot PAC-3 missiles under a contract worth $ 5,4 billion,


        Received consent! What is going on with the world of reporters and magazines!
        The seller gives the buyer consent to the purchase!
        But where does he (the seller) get to fuck!
        The seller carries money of 5,4 billion !!! and he sees whether he agrees !!!
        Well, they say, they persuaded me to take money from you.
        Yes, all these wars are only for the purpose of riveting these missiles non-stop and selling. These "masters of life" do not need war within the limits of their own being. The war is needed somewhere far away, but it is absolutely necessary !!!
        With the money raised from the war, they buy yachts, islands and countries with slaves and journalists, who then creep in front of the owner and work to create another conflict on the planet!

        And the Russians are to blame anyway! wassat
        1. +11
          10 October 2015 11: 46
          Quote: Temples
          Received consent! What is going on with the world of reporters and magazines!
          The seller gives the buyer consent to the purchase!
          But where does he (the seller) get to fuck!
          The seller carries money of 5,4 billion !!! and he sees whether he agrees !!!


          )) Why are you surprised? Just a couple of days ago, a journalist here in an article asks a retired military pilot from Syria a question whether there was an imitation of an air battle between the SU-30 of the Russian Aerospace Forces and the F-15 of the Israeli Air Force, but he claims that it was not. Believe me, the article was overwhelmed with pluses, and all the members of the forum clapped their hands and shouted hurray. Only no one bothered to ask themselves the question: “How could a retired Syrian pilot find out what was happening in the air between Israeli and Russian planes.
          P.S.Lately, the editors of the site completely forgot their editorial responsibilities. Fake on fake, errors after errors.
    2. HAM
      +2
      10 October 2015 10: 47
      If they take up the Saudis "in an adult way", then no "patriots" with "predators" will help them - the brave only with weddings ..
      1. +4
        10 October 2015 11: 00
        Yes, it would not be bad to get the Saudi termite mound up, you see, and oil prices will rise.
        1. +3
          10 October 2015 12: 28
          And if you throw off all the husks of the modifications with a file, it will surely turn out that in fact these new North Korean missiles are nothing more than the same old Scud in a new candy wrapper, nothing more. They even say that their newest and most modern ICBM Tephodon-3 flies on the same hitch of Skad engines.
          1. 0
            10 October 2015 13: 04
            Quote: Basarev
            And if you throw off all the husks of the modifications with a file, it will surely turn out that in fact these new North Korean missiles are nothing more than the same old Scud in a new candy wrapper, nothing more. They even say that their newest and most modern ICBM Tephodon-3 flies on the same hitch of Skad engines.

            ------------------------
            Don't know, my friend, what kind of fuel tank is stuck there ... Maybe they can fly beyond the declared characteristics ... Our "Caliber" also counted 300 km in a straight line, and flew 1500 km to the target along a difficult route and even with a bend over the surface ...
        2. 0
          10 October 2015 13: 01
          Quote: spiriolla-xnumx
          Yes, it would not be bad to get the Saudi termite mound up, you see, and oil prices will rise.

          ------------------
          The Sauds also have no business ... The national piggy bank is melting fast, incomes are not enough to support the eternal holiday of luxury ...
      2. +2
        10 October 2015 18: 21
        Patriot is weak against ballistic missiles.
        I have read for a long time that the percentage of goals captured by the patriots is worthless. Here, real military operations confirm this.
  2. +3
    10 October 2015 10: 36
    The advertised Patriot, in fact, is nothing more than costly Pentagon advertising.
  3. +10
    10 October 2015 10: 39
    If this is really the case, then my applause from the resolute North Korea and the resolute Iranians!

    This is a "kick" under the fat ass of the fat Saudis of medieval obscurantists

    In general, all these Saudis and Qatari are alive only from behind the roof of the United States - there will be another weight distribution in world geopolitics - and the Iranians will deal with them in two ways
    1. +8
      10 October 2015 10: 55
      my applause resistant DPRK

      You must applaud the power next to the DPRK.
    2. +4
      10 October 2015 11: 33
      Quote: Talgat
      If this is really the case, then my applause from the resolute North Korea and the resolute Iranians!

      Unfortunately this is fake. No.
  4. +4
    10 October 2015 10: 41
    It is time for the Saud to pay for all the evil that they brought to their neighbors. In a good company, for such behavior, they would have arranged a "dark" one long ago. But "this is a monument to who will plant it!" (from)
  5. +5
    10 October 2015 10: 41
    At the same time, Riyadh is sure that the launched missiles were received by the Khusts not from North Korea, but delivered by Iran. ”

    Just like:
    -You took seeds from aunt, from Aunt Nyura ???
    -Not at the woman Klava, she sits closer and pours with a hill !!!
  6. +8
    10 October 2015 10: 43
    Patriot is a normal modern air defense system. Like the c300. The question is in whose hands she is. Here we must ask the question, how are the Arabs fighting? Running Scud is not difficult, it is difficult to get out of it. It’s more difficult to shoot down, but if a projectile flies into the desert of which in Arabia 80% of the territory, then why shoot it down. And most likely the Arabs do not know how to use the technology and this is a fact!
    1. 0
      10 October 2015 10: 52
      Quote: Zaurbek
      Patriot is a normal modern air defense system. Like the c300. The question is in whose hands she is. Here we must ask the question, how are the Arabs fighting? Running Scud is not difficult, it is difficult to get out of it. It’s more difficult to shoot down, but if a projectile flies into the desert of which in Arabia 80% of the territory, then why shoot it down. And most likely the Arabs do not know how to use the technology and this is a fact!

      Are you not sure that a local gunner will appear in Yemen with the name Abdullah and the name YN, or PARK?
      1. 0
        11 October 2015 15: 56
        As Comrade Stalin said: "cadres decide everything!" ..and who needs it. And everything can be.
    2. +1
      10 October 2015 10: 55
      At the same time, Riyadh is sure that the launched missiles were received by the Khusts not from North Korea, but delivered by Iran. ” It’s clear that Iran. The Saudis have long been begging for Islamabad a filling for their ballistic missiles. While they have an agreement, we will set when Riyadh will have a hopeless situation. So they escalate the situation.
    3. +4
      10 October 2015 10: 58
      Quote: Zaurbek
      Patriot is a normal modern air defense system. Like the c300. The question is in whose hands she is. Here we must ask the question, how are the Arabs fighting? Running Scud is not difficult, it is difficult to get out of it. It’s more difficult to shoot down, but if a projectile flies into the desert of which in Arabia 80% of the territory, then why shoot it down. And most likely the Arabs do not know how to use the technology and this is a fact!

      Maybe they can, or maybe not, maybe you're right because the desert takes 80%, it’s worth shooting down, all the more likely the complex calculates the flight path, and yet Patriot has one advantage, and this is a fact: which was not what, but the military use was , the most distant Syrian plane shot down last year, well, in 90 a couple of Scuds
  7. vit
    +3
    10 October 2015 10: 49
    yes, the warriors of them are still those ... there is a lot of noise and show-offs, little use. more or less they can fight only with the wrong hands, well, they can scoff at the prisoners, and there’s only one zilch, not warriors.
  8. +1
    10 October 2015 10: 50
    If the prototype of even our old missiles coped with the "patriot" ... well, what's the difference in whose hands the weapon is? The Iranians, too, did not wash with their own weapons!
  9. hartlend
    +2
    10 October 2015 10: 53
    According to the French publication TTU, citing South Korean intelligence, the DPRK has supplied the Yemeni Houthis (the Ansar Allah group) with a number of Hwasong 6 ballistic missiles.

    A good start for an article about missiles would be easier to write - one grandmother said.

    intercept only 40% of the 20 missiles launched to date

    Why confuse interest and things, you can just write 8 out of 20 missiles. A purely Western manner of presenting information to confuse everyone.
  10. +6
    10 October 2015 10: 54
    According to the French edition of TTU, which refers to South Korean intelligence, the DPRK delivered a number of Hwasong 6 ballistic missiles to Yemen’s Hussits (Ansar Allah group), some of which were used by rebels in June at Saudi troops located in Najran and in the area of ​​the air base in King Khaled.


    Interesting news, but still more like a fake or "spinning" money for the Patriot. To launch Hwasong 6, in addition to the machine (PU) shown in the photo, several more vehicles are needed, a control point, preparation for launch, etc. and so on. Covertly moving all this economy is quite difficult in modern conditions. And after the very first start-up, the Saudis would have raised the OPP to the whole world, and then 20! launches and only a request for the Patriots. Let's remember the launches of "Scuds" in Iraq, how many conversations and documentary evidence there was, but here?

    One can’t believe it, Dear colleagues. winked hi
  11. +2
    10 October 2015 10: 54
    If so, how many targets were destroyed by Husit rockets?
  12. +1
    10 October 2015 11: 00
    Not like the truth. Why do Hussites need such missiles? It would be easier for them. Is it possible that it is a bit of a sandal in Riyadh, but this has not yet been heard. No, an obvious fake.
  13. +1
    10 October 2015 11: 04
    Even if we assume that the news is not a fake, I cannot but draw attention to the detail that all the "co-conspirators" on the supply of these missiles to Yemen blame their traditional, so to speak "opponents" for this. South Korea blames North, CA blames Iran. If you asked the opinion of the Ukrainian media, then don't go to the grandmother, the supplier would be named 100%.
    The silence of the Chinese Xinhua news agency on this issue is calming. most likely these deliveries were not "No ..."
  14. -7
    10 October 2015 11: 06
    the Hussites have no chance against the Saudis, they can bite, but no more. weight categories are different.
    but Iran, with its actions, is pushing its neighbors more and more to the transition from the Cold War to the Hot War. and the coalition looms not a gift - KSA, Israel, Turkey. the Arabians have loot, the Turks and Jews have agents, weapons and instructors, and those who want to partisan against the Persian government will not be hard to find - even Azeri, even Balochi, and Iranian Kurds can be wound through the same barzani.
    1. +4
      10 October 2015 11: 09
      Quote: traveler
      . and the coalition looms not a gift - KSA, Israel, Turkey. it’s easy for Arabians to have loot, for Turks and Jews, agents and instructors, and those who want to partisan against the Persian government will not be hard to find - even Azeri, even Balochi, and Iranian Kurds can be wound

      Are you by any chance not the US ambassador? I haven’t read big bullshit for a long time.
      1. +1
        10 October 2015 12: 06
        it’s not by chance that the ambassador didn’t dump me such a sinecure.
        why bullshit? Am I wrong somewhere?
  15. +2
    10 October 2015 11: 14
    Once upon a time, it was necessary to deliver two nuclear strikes without any announcement of the show - the first against Qatar, the second against Saudi Arabia (excluding only Mecca and Madina from the list of attacked targets); On major cities in oil and gas fields, infrastructure, etc.
    And in the Middle East peace and tranquility would have been established for a long time.
    Yes, I’m bad and I don’t feel sorry for them at all - I remember and understand how much blood they drank.
    1. 0
      10 October 2015 11: 18
      Quote: kot stepan
      Once upon a time, it was necessary to deliver two nuclear strikes without any announcement of the show - the first in Qatar, the second in Saudi Arabia (

      Given the development of events, we will soon apply not 2, but 222, and not only on them. Only it will not matter much.
  16. +1
    10 October 2015 11: 16
    Terrible mess. The most interesting thing is that everyone links on the site /www.ttu.fr the article to which everyone refers "Patriot contre SCUD" no.
    The Saudis wrote about the launch of the SCADs and the fact that the Hussites launched two missiles that were successfully intercepted by the Patriots.
  17. +2
    10 October 2015 11: 20
    “The Saudi Patriot air defense systems were able to intercept only 40% of the 20 R-17 / Hwasong 6 missiles launched to date,” the bmpd blog quotes the publication. “At the same time, Riyadh is confident that the launched missiles were received by the Khusts not from North Korea, but delivered by Iran.”


    Camels do not get it childishly, this is not a staged camel race, where the king's camel is always a champion, they have such a democracy. Nonsense, these "patriots" and their servants are the same. Anything you give these harem warriors is still out of the question.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +1
      10 October 2015 11: 32
      Quote: Arkan
      Camels are not childish

      You are in the know to see ... And how many Hussites fired Skud missiles on the Saudis?
  18. +5
    10 October 2015 11: 24
    Quote: aszzz888
    The advertised Patriot, in fact, is nothing more than costly Pentagon advertising.

    Of course, I understand that our trains are the most train trains in the world. But what, do you personally know specifically about the patriot? About his guidance system, range of detection and destruction, of what installations the SAM consists of, how to counteract it ... to say that? Damn, well, already tired of reading these amateurish sayings!
    1. +1
      10 October 2015 11: 28
      DRON, if you are such a great connoisseur of American weapons, then enlighten us, you probably know his technical data not on Wikipedia, but YOU USED THIS SYSTEM YOURSELF ??? Well, tell us please !!! YOU ARE NOT A DEALER ??? Wikipedia ONLY DO NOT retell
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +1
        10 October 2015 11: 49
        Quote: fig3
        Well, tell us please !!!

        Here it is necessary to proceed from the veracity of the information specified in the article. To begin with, no article cited by the source exists. All this is sucked from the finger (or worse). Think for yourself. Why would the Hussites buy Scuds from the Koreans? Why the hell did they surrender to them? The accuracy of the R-17 complex missiles differs little from the German Fau-2, they only shoot at large cities with chemical stuffing or nuclear warheads. Of course, you can try to get Scud at a military base, but the probability of causing any damage is close to zero. Well, some of the militants need to be trained to use this bandura ... Husits ​​are easier to buy with this money and grenade launchers, which is much more productive.

        PS: The Hussites, according to the Saudis, made two launches by the Scuds, which were captured in the warehouses of the Yemeni army, but both missiles (again from the words of the Saudis) were intercepted. The Hussites themselves did not say anything about Scud.
    2. 0
      10 October 2015 11: 31
      Missile defense mode

      He needs a special satellite in orbit. This satellite must inform [17] in advance to the PATRIOT location station the coordinates of the rocket and its flight path [18]. It takes as much as 90 seconds. (almost 10 times longer than the S-400). THAT IS WHAT THE FAVORITE WIKIPEDIA IS TO US
      IF YOU ARE A BIG KNOWLEDGE AND NOT A TRAVELER, TELL US TO US, JUST DO NOT QUOTE Wikipedia, I UNDERSTAND YOU PERSONALLY KNOW ABOUT THIS COMPLEX NOT BY HEARING ??? PERSONALY TO SAY THIS FROM IT WAS AFFECTED ??? At the end of the war, disputes began in the USA about the effectiveness of the Patriot complex. Critics have sometimes claimed such low accuracy of interception as 25% in Saudi Arabia and 33% in Israel. Advocates indicated very high efficiency.
      So, representatives of the US Army published data on 80% of successful interception in Saudi Arabia and 50% in Israel
      1. +2
        10 October 2015 12: 36
        3! And what do you dislike about Wikipedia. At the end of the article there are always links to sources from which these or other materials are taken and, in most cases, you can find in-depth material from the link. You probably trust the rocket technology website. So, increasing the firing range from 300km from KVO 450m to 900km KVO increased to 3000m. And now tell me why I need to spend an expensive missile defense missile if the target goes on a miss. It is known that the nuclear warhead is not responsible and will not be damaged. And who told you that with missile guidance needs a satellite. Data from a satellite is needed when an adversary uses strategic missile weapons in the early detection and analysis of the flight path of a target.
  19. +1
    10 October 2015 11: 38
    The Saudis will still get theirs.
    1. 0
      10 October 2015 11: 47
      Quote: Zai Pali
      The Saudis will still get theirs.

      Is it really from you?))) wink
      1. +1
        10 October 2015 14: 16
        Well, not from Australia, we are no warriors drinks . But their enemies are only arriving.
  20. +1
    10 October 2015 11: 42
    Quote: fig3
    DRON, if you are such a great connoisseur of American weapons, then enlighten us, you probably know his technical data not on Wikipedia, but YOU USED THIS SYSTEM YOURSELF ??? Well, tell us please !!! YOU ARE NOT A DEALER ??? Wikipedia ONLY DO NOT retell

    You've already read everything you need to know on the wiki))) Well, seriously, no offense. You Jews and away, bred and you spread everything to them on a silver platter. More than once I saw on many sites how vain people, in an attempt to "rise", spread their knowledge, which, perhaps, constitutes a certain degree of secrecy. Well, do not be so naive ... The enemy does not sleep)))
    PS still a patriot, a rather serious complex, do not underestimate it ...
    1. +1
      10 October 2015 15: 05
      Quote: Dr Dron
      Quote: fig3
      DRON, if you are such a great connoisseur of American weapons, then enlighten us, you probably know his technical data not on Wikipedia, but YOU USED THIS SYSTEM YOURSELF ??? Well, tell us please !!! YOU ARE NOT A DEALER ??? Wikipedia ONLY DO NOT retell

      You've already read everything you need to know on the wiki))) Well, seriously, no offense. You Jews and away, bred and you spread everything to them on a silver platter. More than once I saw on many sites how vain people, in an attempt to "rise", spread their knowledge, which, perhaps, constitutes a certain degree of secrecy. Well, do not be so naive ... The enemy does not sleep)))
      PS still a patriot, a rather serious complex, do not underestimate it ...
  21. +1
    10 October 2015 12: 06
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    Quote: kot stepan
    Once upon a time, it was necessary to deliver two nuclear strikes without any announcement of the show - the first in Qatar, the second in Saudi Arabia (

    Given the development of events, we will soon apply not 2, but 222, and not only on them. Only it will not matter much.

    And why do you hate your neighbors and loved ones or have already dug up bunkers for everyone. Something often starts to slip among the "urashek". You should be held in an ordinary bunker for at least three days so that you understand everything you want to doom your associates to.
  22. 0
    10 October 2015 12: 12
    Yes, babble. The latest Patriot air defense systems of the Greatest Power cannot intercept the slightly modernized ancient Soviet missiles. What can I say about "Calibers" and, moreover, about the terrible "Yars" and "Rubezhi".
    1. 0
      10 October 2015 14: 23
      The American military industry is redeployed to offensive weapons. Yars and Frontiers if they fly, then I'm afraid there will be no one to stop them. But Iskander is a great weapon. Why Russia does not leave the agreement on medium-range missiles is a mystery to me.
  23. 0
    10 October 2015 16: 03
    I don’t like this Saudi triangle for a long time ...
    1. 0
      10 October 2015 23: 23
      Maybe we fuck ?! belay
  24. +4
    10 October 2015 17: 15
    Quote: Gormengast
    Yes, babble. The latest Patriot air defense systems of the Greatest Power cannot intercept the slightly modernized ancient Soviet missiles. What can I say about "Calibers" and, moreover, about the terrible "Yars" and "Rubezhi".


    I’ll tell you another terrible secret. Even two.

    FIRST SCARY SECRET.
    The Patriot will not be able to intercept a mortar mine fired from a 120-mm mortar.

    SECOND SCARY SECRET.
    The newest Russian S-400 complex and even the promising S-500 will not be able to intercept the same mortar mine ...

    Damn, this is a site MILITARY REVIEW or some bunch of stuff? It looks like the second

    You can find out from which H.R.ENA "Patriot" should intercept "Yarsy"
    and "Frontiers" ???? Or there is nothing more to write ?? The complex is designed to intercept Tochka, Lance and similar missiles. The interception range is about 100 km. And here is the ICBM ?????
    Even "SCUD" is not for him. It was used in the first Gulf War for lack of something else. According to the principle - "fish without fish and cancer". The same is now in CA.

    I agree with those who wrote, and what for, to intercept a missile, which not only has a 3 km KVO, and carries a head half to three times smaller than the Soviet original ... Or do you need to shoot, even if it flies past? What for? Spend millions of missiles to intercept junk ??? After all, she does not shoot at vital points. Yemenis have only 6 SCAD launchers with ammunition of 33 missiles. If something remains, then a little. Let them shoot
  25. 0
    10 October 2015 22: 28
    that’s who benefits from the war on the Arabian Peninsula, it’s the Amerikos, the money earned from weapons !! laughing
  26. 0
    11 October 2015 18: 45
    A rocket flies along a ballistic trajectory and is easy to calculate. The PAC 3 flight speed is enough to intercept the SCAD missile. The only gripe is that the SCAD missile warhead is not destroyed, it flies further and is undermined. In the conditions of shooting at a megalopolis, this becomes critical.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"