Military Review

Russia asked Britain for assistance in establishing contact with the Free Syrian Army

45
The Russian Federation appealed to Britain for assistance in establishing contact with the Free Syrian Army (FSA) to coordinate actions in the fight against the Islamic State terrorist group, as well as for the possible participation of the FSA in the political process. This request was voiced by Russian Ambassador Alexander Yakovenko during negotiations with the political director.




"According to Alexander Yakovenko, the Russian side would be grateful to the British partners for their assistance in establishing contacts with the Free Syrian Army (FSA) for coordinating efforts between it and the Syrian armed forces in the fight against IS, as well as the possible involvement of the FSA in the political process "- Leads the message of the representative of the press service of the diplomatic mission of RIA "News".

The free Syrian army is the main unification of the armed Syrian opposition. At the same time, the Syrian ambassador in Moscow, Riyad Haddad, had previously stated that the SSA group had broken up, and its representatives had joined other groups. Earlier, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov also stated that Russia does not consider members of the FSA as terrorists.

In addition, the Russian ambassador spoke about the objectives of the military operation conducted by Russia on the basis of the appeal of the Syrian government, and the course of its conduct.

"He expressed interest in receiving from the British side the information she has about the infrastructure of extremists to increase the effectiveness of air strikes," the diplomat said.

In addition, Yakovenko suggested that the British authorities find a legitimate way to participate in the bombing of the militants of the Islamic State.

“Great Britain is a sovereign country and is free to make decisions. But it should be noted that Russian military assistance is carried out at the request of the Syrian government, that is, in full accordance with international law. Whether Damascus asked Britain to provide the same assistance, I do not know, ”he quotes RIA as“News».

According to the diplomat, for Great Britain, as well as of another state, “there is another way to carry out bombardments against IS and other terrorists legitimately.

Yakovenko said that he was referring to the “mandate of the UN Security Council, provided in response to a request from the Syrian government.”

“This is what we are working on in New York now,” he stressed.
According to Yakovenko, "this is how Britain could have its share in the bombing of Syria."

“Russia is far from being able to pull the blanket over itself. We want to work together, ”he concluded.
Photos used:
http://globallookpress.com/
45 comments
Ad

The editorial board of Voenniy Obozreniye urgently needs a proofreader. Requirements: impeccable knowledge of the Russian language, diligence, discipline. Contact: [email protected]

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. nord62
    nord62 9 October 2015 09: 54 New
    33
    Absolutely the right approach. Even if all else fails, other groups will still squint in the direction of the SSA, no longer trust them, which will prompt many of the SSA to switch to Assad. But the fact that the British will give contacts is poorly believed!
    1. vovanpain
      vovanpain 9 October 2015 09: 57 New
      26
      Of course they won’t give it, because where they can’t find this SSA themselves they cannot search for felts in ISIS.
      1. bulvas
        bulvas 9 October 2015 10: 00 New
        +2
        Quote: nord62
        Absolutely the right approach.



        Yes, all the British will deceive, they do not know how to
        1. BilliBoms09
          BilliBoms09 9 October 2015 10: 26 New
          +1
          “Great Britain is a sovereign country and free to make decisions. But it should be noted that Russian military assistance is carried out at the request of the Syrian government, that is, in full compliance with international law. Did Damascus ask Britain to provide the same help, I don’t know ”
          Раньше был "Британский Лев", его можно было любить или ненавидеть, но к нему относились уважительно. Сейчас лев выродился в этакого шакала Табаки, который без позволения своего хозяина и слова сказать не смеет.Так что нашем МИД зря тратит время.
          1. GDP
            GDP 9 October 2015 10: 36 New
            +4
            so our Foreign Ministry is wasting time.

            not in vain:

            Well done our! put the plug to the British!

            If they don’t give information, then how to blame us for inaccurate bombing?

            If they give, then it will immediately become clear who is hu? Where is the real opposition, and where are the Islamists from Alkaida and ISIS, and even a split and mistrust will sow between the militants ...
            How, for example, to the same alnusra to coordinate joint military operations with the SSA if they do not have confidence that they will not give them information about them to the Russians, but through us and Assad’s troops ...

            In any case, we remain white and fluffy and have our dividends at the same time :)
          2. Boatsman_Palych
            Boatsman_Palych 9 October 2015 11: 19 New
            +2
            Yes, our jackals are just trolling wink Просто считается, что "лидеры" сирийской оппозиции в ЛондОне сидят.
        2. hydrox
          hydrox 9 October 2015 10: 29 New
          11
          Quote: bulvas
          Yes, all the British will deceive, they do not know how to

          And this is not the point here ... everyone is watching the British diplomatic trolling by Russia :: if the Anglo-Saxons give contact, we can still look for this SSA, and if we find it, we will talk with the SSA directly, without the British, i.e., the British will be moved away from this process - and time goes by and the terrorists are torn ...
          Другой расклад таков:: наш запрс сделан, но англо-саксы начинают тянуть время и не даать контакт, однако теперь уже все знают, что Россия первой попыталась решить вопрос с "умеренными", а мелкобританцы не дают для этого никаких возможностей. Опять Россия в выигрыше, а британцы в прогаре:: с нашей точки зрения "бритты не хотят, чтобы Россия дифференцировала умеренных и ИГИЛовцев" - а террористов тем временем продолжают драть ...
          And here we are winning - a win-win game, however!
        3. Buffalo
          Buffalo 9 October 2015 10: 59 New
          0
          While they lie, we destroy the terrorists.
          Time works for us.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Denis DV
        Denis DV 9 October 2015 10: 01 New
        14
        It is clear that there is no CCA, it is easier to find the address of Santa Claus. Ours mock at their Foreign Ministry and governments - go there without knowing where, bring something without knowing what laughing
        1. Corporal Valera
          Corporal Valera 9 October 2015 10: 06 New
          +9
          Yes, a noble trolling of the British.
      4. Fregate
        Fregate 9 October 2015 10: 05 New
        +6
        Да нету там "умеренных". Они с ИГИЛом одно целое. Просто их придумали и используют как посредников, готовят им бойцов, дают оружие и отправляют к ним, а потом вуаля..."Ой, они нас кинули и примкнули к ИГИЛ". Завуалированная помощь ИГИЛ и мнимая борьба с ними.
      5. Silkway0026
        Silkway0026 9 October 2015 10: 09 New
        +4
        The news itself is interesting and good.

        But the feed !!! Neither style nor literacy.

        1. Who posted the material, why there is no signature?
        2.
        This request was voiced by Russian Ambassador Alexander Yakovenko during negotiations with political director.

        Political Director - Why? Great Britain ? Gas stations? Trolleybus fleet?
        3.
        In addition, the British ambassador spoke about the objectives of the military operation conducted by Russia.

        British ambassador? or the Russian ambassador to Britain?
        1. Alexkorzun
          Alexkorzun 9 October 2015 10: 39 New
          +1
          Согласен, частенько "наши корреспонденты" лудят статейки "на коленке". А модераторы смотрят куда? мимо ?
      6. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 9 October 2015 10: 13 New
        +3
        Quote: vovanpain
        Of course they won’t give it, because where they can’t find this SSA themselves they cannot search for felts in ISIS.

        SchA in Europe will undergo urgent casting among refugees, for the post of head of the Syrian opposition laughing
        1. Alexkorzun
          Alexkorzun 9 October 2015 10: 44 New
          +1
          Да вроде после того, как американцы на вопрос об именах лидеров ССА стыдливо промолчали, высунулась какая то девица, Маис эль-Криди, функционер "Национального комитета освободительного действия Сирии", по быстрому, чтоб кураторам не так стрёмно было.
          1. Silkway0026
            Silkway0026 9 October 2015 10: 48 New
            +1
            "Национального комитета освободительного действия Сирии"


            also, I suppose, on a barbecue of some kind of London this committee is drawn up)))
      7. KazaK Bo
        KazaK Bo 9 October 2015 10: 41 New
        0
        vovanpain
        Of course they won’t give it, because where they can’t find this SSA themselves they cannot search for felts in ISIS.

        N-A-Y-D-U-T! In Soho slums or other refugee camps EVERY SECOND READY TO BECOME A HERO! If only they gave the opportunity to live in London! Similarly, such SSA will be found in Germany ... France ... Sweden, etc. .... even in Dill !!!
        This is to explain to us later ... that they all fled from the persecution of Assad .... gathered here to unite and begin a new stage in the fight against ISIS ... but without leaving London (Porizh ... Stockholm ...)! And there are worthy leaders - one lives in Porizh (but has not been in Syria for 20 years), the other .... the former minister is either in Morocco or Tunisia (another sufferer ... you see ... Assad wanted to to arrest his poor fellow ... for the opposition according to him, but ... that he stole millions of budget money and bribes - well, whoever doesn’t happen! It's a trifle) ... The truth is that there is no political force behind them ... they don’t represent ... BUT THEY WILL BECOME AN OPPOSITION AT ONCE! HOW ONLY APPOINTED BY THE LEADERS AND WILL GIVE BIG MONEY!
        So if the West needs the CCA and the leaders-FIND !!! Wait !!! And they will show on TV! 2-3 times!
    2. Maxom75
      Maxom75 9 October 2015 10: 02 New
      +2
      First you need to find this SSA (the remaining two people).))) Then already establish contacts.
    3. Vend
      Vend 9 October 2015 10: 02 New
      +2
      Quote: nord62
      Absolutely the right approach. Even if all else fails, other groups will still squint in the direction of the SSA, no longer trust them, which will prompt many of the SSA to switch to Assad. But the fact that the British will give contacts is poorly believed!

      And the British face in de ... mo. What a chic chic move. Refuse to look bad, agree, so Russia will convince the opposition to cooperate laughing For the British, the situation is stalemate laughing
    4. Andrea
      Andrea 9 October 2015 10: 16 New
      0
      Quote: nord62
      Absolutely the right approach. Even if all else fails, other groups will still squint in the direction of the SSA, no longer trust them, which will prompt many of the SSA to switch to Assad. But the fact that the British will give contacts is poorly believed!
      Assad is unlikely to accept the help of the SSA, they are not much different about ISIS. Moreover, they have to be found with difficulty, even in the UK smile , although there is an opportunity.
      And there is an opportunity for those from the SSA who have not yet merged to really earn real political dividends, and not just make claims on power and support from the United States.
    5. marlin1203
      marlin1203 9 October 2015 10: 19 New
      0
      Nah ... well this is an evil trolling on our part laughing the shaves would rather bite themselves for ... they would bite than they would help us. And if they don’t, it will once again discredit them in international geopolitics. CLASSICAL STAFF SITUATION
      1. beer-youk
        beer-youk 9 October 2015 13: 21 New
        +1
        Let me disagree. This is zugzwang, where there is a possibility of a move, but all moves worsen the position. Data cannot be given for obvious reasons. It is impossible to give, because to find in the heap of gangs of one leader with whom contact is possible is unrealistic. To appoint someone with a strong-willed decision - to provoke a split and immoderate bloody showdowns within the moderate. In short, wherever you throw - everywhere a wedge. You will not envy the little ones!
        1. theodore rasp
          theodore rasp 9 October 2015 13: 45 New
          0
          Yes, the situation is worse than the governor.
        2. theodore rasp
          theodore rasp 9 October 2015 13: 45 New
          0
          Yes, the situation is worse than the governor.
    6. fox21h
      fox21h 9 October 2015 10: 42 New
      +2
      Int our trolls, the free Syrian army has not existed for a long time, somewhere around the age of 11, some were destroyed by the Islamists, some fled, a small part joined the igil, the rest joined Ased. Well, let them try to find these units ...
      Thumb up, trolling 80 level
  2. vsoltan
    vsoltan 9 October 2015 09: 55 New
    +8
    Great Britain is a sovereign country and free to make decisions

    Some dubious intermediary ... however, our Foreign Ministry probably knows better
    1. Silkway0026
      Silkway0026 9 October 2015 10: 12 New
      +2
      Something seems to me that our intermediaries do not particularly need. This is a kind of trolling of the Westerners.
      1. MIKHAN
        MIKHAN 9 October 2015 10: 17 New
        +3
        Quote: Silkway0026
        Something seems to me that our intermediaries do not particularly need. This is a kind of trolling of the Westerners.

        And there is! In BV we have many sympathizers, since the days of the USSR (they studied with us and remember us with warmth ..)
      2. Vladimir 1964
        Vladimir 1964 9 October 2015 12: 23 New
        0
        Quote: Silkway0026
        This is a kind of trolling of the Westerners.



        Moreover, Sergey, I’m successful in trolling. It will be interesting to look at Cameron's spin. Moreover, for any outcome of this situation, the Anglo-Saxons remain in the loser. hi
  3. Decathlon
    Decathlon 9 October 2015 09: 55 New
    +8
    Такое ощущение, что в ход пошли и политические "калибры"?! Начинаем обкладывать партнёров, по-тихоньку... repeat
    1. amirbek
      amirbek 9 October 2015 10: 16 New
      0
      Quote: Decathlon
      в ход пошли и политические "калибры"?!

      began to pull pitfalls ashore
  4. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 9 October 2015 09: 56 New
    +3
    Probably for the order ... When the arrogant Saxons of Russia helped, just like that?
    Самим придется опять, а вот как только ..так они сразу тут как тут с "помощью"..И криков будет "Мы помогли России, если бы не мы то все и т.д." Все знакомо и стандартно)))
  5. Kosta153
    Kosta153 9 October 2015 09: 56 New
    +3
    Quote: nord62
    Absolutely the right approach. Even if all else fails, other groups will still squint in the direction of the SSA, no longer trust them, which will prompt many of the SSA to switch to Assad. But the fact that the British will give contacts is poorly believed!
    Of course, they won’t give. It is interesting how they argue with what.
  6. aleks700
    aleks700 9 October 2015 09: 57 New
    0
    Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has also previously stated that Russia does not consider FSA members to be terrorists.
    Well, what are the double standards? And how can pin-dos be blamed for the fact that for them there are bad terrorists and there are good ones. Well, the supreme issued. Supreme, and Lavrov is just his voice.
  7. win
    win 9 October 2015 09: 59 New
    +2
    the British will give contacts - hard to believe!

    And they will not give because of impotent malice that they cannot now influence the political process of settlement in Syria
  8. Sharky
    Sharky 9 October 2015 09: 59 New
    +1
    Откажутся предоставлять информацию, как пить дать! Отмазка будет в стиле англо-саксов: "Мы не может поделиться данными, потому что у нас есть подозрения, что завладев этой информацией, Россия поделится ей с силами Ассада или сама использует их для бомбардировок их мест дислокации"! Как-то так.
  9. Alexander 3
    Alexander 3 9 October 2015 10: 00 New
    0
    Ours to find out the coordinates of the opposition and ask, are you against B. Assad? Well, then make a decision.
  10. olimpiada15
    olimpiada15 9 October 2015 10: 02 New
    +1
    The smart move of our representatives.
    Only where and how can the British find this moderate opposition, declare the existence of such an opposition is one thing, and confirm the fact of its existence is a completely different story.
    Вспоминая репортажи начала Сирийского конфликта, силы " демократии" представляло одно движение, которое прославлял запад как борцов с "режимом тирана Асада" и незамечал их жестокостей, пока один их представителей демократов не съел перед камерой сердце сирийского солдата. Нет никаких оснований считать, что кроме террористов в Сирии есть еще влиятельные силы, противостоящие Асаду.Представители оппозиции есть,но влиятельной силой являются террористы.
  11. asar
    asar 9 October 2015 10: 02 New
    +2
    to coordinate actions in the fight against the Islamic State terrorist group

    Наши решили "дробить" оппозицию САР.
    "Подстава" ССА?!
    Diplomats in the silence of classrooms, the military - on the battlefield! One thing, one goal!

    Немного о "военном" - сегодня наши пилоты на "крокодилах" уделывают "духов"!
    But, damn it, the guys take risks (literally, they fly over their heads!), God forbid them lossless, they will return to the base!
  12. Reptiloid
    Reptiloid 9 October 2015 10: 04 New
    +1
    Quote: Kosta153
    Of course, they won’t give. It is interesting how they argue with what.

    Ours simply observe the diplomatic ritual and tick off
    1. MIKHAN
      MIKHAN 9 October 2015 10: 22 New
      +1
      Quote: Reptiloid
      Quote: Kosta153
      Of course, they won’t give. It is interesting how they argue with what.

      Ours simply observe the diplomatic ritual and tick off

      Excellent spoken! hi
  13. Stinger
    Stinger 9 October 2015 10: 07 New
    0
    А Обама-то одобрит? Лауреат всё же. А кроме шуток, ответ известен заранее. Если отбросить дипломатическую словесную шелуху, получится: "Сам д.у.р.а.к."
  14. nord62
    nord62 9 October 2015 10: 07 New
    +1
    Quote: Kosta153
    Quote: nord62
    Absolutely the right approach. Even if all else fails, other groups will still squint in the direction of the SSA, no longer trust them, which will prompt many of the SSA to switch to Assad. But the fact that the British will give contacts is poorly believed!
    Of course, they won’t give. It is interesting how they argue with what.

    The argument will be absolutely simple in diplomatic bird language: since ... based on .... since ...( etc.) - does not seem possible. And here Russia earns a few more advantages: 1) receives an argument - we turned to you for help (which is not needed for a hundred years), but you refused; 2) receives evidence that sponsors terrorists, including England; 3) shows the doubters that in fact only Russia is fighting the terrorists, and the rest are pretending - so think partners (fie - what kind of word) with whom to lead friendship ... Well and so on!
  15. evil partisan
    evil partisan 9 October 2015 10: 11 New
    0
    As young people say: level 80 trolling. yes
  16. Sergey Medvedev
    Sergey Medvedev 9 October 2015 10: 11 New
    -2
    Make contact with this CCA, find consensus and kick it! Kicking!
  17. ssn18
    ssn18 9 October 2015 10: 11 New
    0
    And I personally am interested in another question, why the SSA leaders themselves are not looking for contacts with either the Russian Federation or Assad. Not clear !!!
  18. AdekvatNICK
    AdekvatNICK 9 October 2015 10: 14 New
    +8
    The genesis of the relationship of individual comrades to the participation of the Russian Federation in the fighting in Syria:
    1. Putin will not be solved.
    2. Well no.
    3. No.
    4. Yes, where? ..
    5. Where is he going? !!
    6. Everything. Now everything is exactly.
    7. They began to bomb. Do they have something to bomb? Oh, do not make me laugh.
    8. Oh, do not tell "did not hit the civilians." How do we know ...
    9. They did not get into civilians? Damn, did they get into ISIS? Are they completely crazy? In ISIS - living people!
    10. Ahhhh! They bombed a kindergarten LIH !!! ..
    11. Okay, this was not a kindergarten or ISIS. It was a hospital in Afghan Kunduz and was bombed by the Yankees. But well-intentioned. Not that this Putin ...
    12. Soon they will be exhausted. Look - see how nervously the guy in the Su-25 pulls its wing? That's all cramps! Ah, was he just aiming to reset the bomb? ..
    13. We all consulted and decided - it's time to put an end to this. Therefore, as a sign of contempt, we stop writing about it, thinking and talking about it. Leave for communication only the middle fingers, hehe. And overthrow the Bloody one.
    14. Today, not one, but two Russians in Syria were immediately shot. This indicates an undoubted accumulation of forces for the obviously failed land offensive. And how does the land offensive end for the Russians - we know, yeah! .. Who said, "taking Berlin"? Where is this traitor ?!
    15. Strange, but four days have passed, and Putin did not launch a land offensive. It must have been completely exhausted, poor thing. And exhausted. All tyranny is doomed.
    16. They began to launch ISIS rockets from ships. Rockets! It turns out they have rockets! The latter, of course. It’s just that all Putin’s planes have already been beaten, and so we have to let the remnants of military weakness go into the air ... Ha ha ha, we will answer this. Right in the face of the TV. Mode - FSE. So write it down.
    17. They are launching rockets again.
    18. And throw bombs.
    19. And do not let ground troops into battle. Otherwise, they would have long been bogged down and lined everything! ..
    20. Stacks of their dead! Shta-be-la-mi!
    21. Ahhh ... They are just afraid. Yes. Therefore - that’s all. But we know! ..
    22. Bombs again, rockets again.
    23. Once upon a time it should end! Where does Soros just look? ..
    24. They hit again. Not in that sense, but in ISIS.
    25. Yes yo! .. 26. Yes b ..! ..
    27. Yes Yeperny theater! ..
    28. Well, figs with them ... You’re worried about them, worried - and no thanks !!!
  19. russmensch
    russmensch 9 October 2015 10: 19 New
    +2
    Ай да знатный троллинг Англии. И что им теперь делать? Не давать? - значит их там нет и Россия может мочить все что стреляет. Давать? - но тогда русские поставят этим "повстанцам" такие условия, что все затраты на них просто рухнут да и информация не нужная просочится типа задач и целей которые ставились перед ними, поставки вооружения и многое другое. Да и кем эти задачи ставились... В общем засада полная...
  20. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 9 October 2015 10: 51 New
    +3
    Double standards however ... You look at all this with a bitter grin ... Blood pours like a river in the world ... And these world prizes share everything!
  21. Monos
    Monos 9 October 2015 10: 56 New
    +5
    According to Yakovenko, "this is how Britain could have its share in the bombing of Syria."


    Affiget! Are they there, fighting for the right to bomb?
  22. veksha50
    veksha50 9 October 2015 11: 23 New
    0
    Now the news allegedly addresses this free army to Russia that they are supposedly ready to wage a joint fight against ISIS ...

    Honestly, I do not believe this ... If you even imagine that they supposedly will fight together with government troops against the Islamic State, then what does the appeal to Russia mean ??? YOU are fighting against the legitimate president, and not specifically Russia, and solve this issue (Assad) by representatives ...

    And then - fighting against Assad, you (a free army) are fighting, first of all, to bring your man (your people) to power ... What kind of joint struggle against the Islamic State can be talked about if the struggle for power again flares up between you again ???

    It seems to me that this is an attempt to introduce a fifth column into government troops, an attempt by Jesuit methods and Eastern cunning methods to obtain information about the methods, ways and plans of the struggle against IS and the opposition, and then to set up, or open a front, in general, to make disgusting how pro-government forces, and the Russian contingent ...

    But this is purely my subjective opinion ...
    1. Egevich
      Egevich 9 October 2015 12: 29 New
      +1
      Quote: veksha50
      Now the news allegedly addresses this free army to Russia that they are supposedly ready to wage a joint fight against ISIS ...

      Honestly, I do not believe this ... If you even imagine that they supposedly will fight together with government troops against the Islamic State, then what does the appeal to Russia mean ??? YOU are fighting against the legitimate president, and not specifically Russia, and solve this issue (Assad) by representatives ...

      And then - fighting against Assad, you (a free army) are fighting, first of all, to bring your man (your people) to power ... What kind of joint struggle against the Islamic State can be talked about if the struggle for power again flares up between you again ???

      It seems to me that this is an attempt to introduce a fifth column into government troops, an attempt by Jesuit methods and Eastern cunning methods to obtain information about the methods, ways and plans of the struggle against IS and the opposition, and then to set up, or open a front, in general, to make disgusting how pro-government forces, and the Russian contingent ...

      But this is purely my subjective opinion ...


      and you look at it from a different angle ... if the SSA has long been gone, then who is stopping you from creating your own SSA? continue to continue, I think, it is not necessary ... the main thing is to determine whether the name is taken ...)))
      1. veksha50
        veksha50 9 October 2015 14: 39 New
        0
        Quote: Egevich
        if the SSA is long gone, then who is preventing you from creating your own SSA?



        This is not a military issue, but a political one ...
  23. star44
    star44 9 October 2015 11: 42 New
    +1
    Полагаю, что это идет выявление учредителей ЗАО "ИГИЛ"... "Пенд.осы" уже сознались, дело за Бритами... И дальше по кругу. Плюс забили "чопик" по правомерности применения ВВС на территории суверенного государства... Фактически - идет стратегическая операция по окружению и уничтожению "противника"... В данном случае под "противником" понимается не ИГИЛ (это так, расходный материал), а непонятная антироссийская коалиция). Для простоты и абстрактности понимания происходящих в Сирии событий - наш Сталинград (подготовительный этап операции (прошел), наступательный (идет), окружение (следующий), уничтожение и последствия). Характерно, что обороняющаяся и наступающая сторона за 70 лет не поменялась, а вот противник пополнился нашими бывшими "Союзниками". Но последствия, думаю, для всех будут схожими.
    1. veksha50
      veksha50 9 October 2015 14: 38 New
      0
      Quote: Star44
      . В данном случае под "противником" understood not ISIS (this is a consumable), and incomprehensible anti-Russian coalition)



      Ну, коалиция еще и антисирийская... А в обще-то, как раз ЭТО их и страшит - что российские ВКС уничтожают не только силы ИГ, но и всю псевдоумеренную "оппозицию"...
  24. gukoyan
    gukoyan 9 October 2015 11: 56 New
    0
    Very competent approach!
  25. star44
    star44 9 October 2015 12: 01 New
    0
    Quote: Star44
    Полагаю, что это идет выявление учредителей ЗАО "ИГИЛ"... "Пенд.осы" уже сознались, дело за Бритами... И дальше по кругу. Плюс забили "чопик" по правомерности применения ВВС на территории суверенного государства... Фактически - идет стратегическая операция по окружению и уничтожению "противника"... В данном случае под "противником" понимается не ИГИЛ (это так, расходный материал), а непонятная антироссийская коалиция). Для простоты и абстрактности понимания происходящих в Сирии событий - наш Сталинград (подготовительный этап операции (прошел), наступательный (идет), окружение (следующий), уничтожение и последствия). Характерно, что обороняющаяся и наступающая сторона за 70 лет не поменялась, а вот противник пополнился нашими бывшими "Союзниками". Но последствия, думаю, для всех будут схожими.
  26. skaramaks27
    skaramaks27 9 October 2015 16: 02 New
    0
    Britons ... these are not cowboys. Their 5 and 6 is not Langley. serious guys
  27. mamont5
    mamont5 9 October 2015 17: 52 New
    0
    Quote: vovanpain
    Of course they won’t give it, because where they can’t find this SSA themselves they cannot search for felts in ISIS.

    This SSA seems to be a purely virtual entity.
  28. Alcoholic
    Alcoholic 9 October 2015 19: 33 New
    0
    А если не будет контакта не будет "свободной армии" wassat