The Pentagon: the analysis of the objectives of the VKS RF is not yet complete, but it’s already clear that these are not IG objects.

The Pentagon continues to analyze the objectives of the Russian aviation in Syria, while adhering to the initial version that the objects subjected to shelling are not related to the “Islamic State,” said a spokeswoman for the agency, Michel Baldans, to a correspondent RIA News.




Earlier, the Russian military published information about strikes against the IS, in particular in the same places where the Americans themselves bombed (Raqqah, near Palmyra, Deir ez-Zor).

“We are aware of these messages, but we can’t provide any additional information about the specific targets (aviation) of the Russian Federation,” said Baldansa.

“Nevertheless, it is obvious that Russia strikes in Syria in places where there is no IS. We continue to analyze these specific goals. ”- she added.

According to the Pentagon representative, the coalition is “deeply concerned about any actions against moderate Syrian elements, since such actions on the part of the Russian Federation lead to the radicalization of the very elements that we (the United States) support.”
Photos used:
RIA News. Dmitry Vinogradov
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

60 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. oleg-gr 8 October 2015 10: 59 New
    • 50
    • 0
    +50
    After analyzing the goals, it became clear that the Russians bombed the hospital in Kunduz. A little smoke and still come up with.
    1. Air Force captain 8 October 2015 11: 01 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Quote: oleg-gr
      After analyzing the targets, it became clear that the Russians bombed the hospital in Kunduz.

      ... in alliance with the Martians
      1. MIKHAN 8 October 2015 11: 08 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        Well, what is there to analyze ... The Syrian Army goes on the offensive! The stripping begins, and this is the most difficult, but effective action! And there Iran and Iraq will start, etc. It is time to restore and clean the Middle East devils ... (if the Saudis and Turks are rocking, I do not envy them) hi
        1. crazyrom 9 October 2015 06: 22 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          so why any tests at all, because everything is clear.
      2. lelikas 8 October 2015 11: 14 New
        • 31
        • 0
        +31
        If the video from our drone shows how dollars fly off in an explosion, it was moderate opposition!
      3. Sid.74 8 October 2015 11: 45 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: oleg-gr
        After analyzing the goals, it became clear that the Russians bombed the hospital in Kunduz. A little smoke and still come up with.

        good
        Cardboard and flightless missiles. It is a pity that the militants of the IG do not read Ukrainian bloggers, perhaps the survivors are at least a little comforted.

        Ukrainians are beginning to massively support ISIS in the secret hope that the Russian Aerospace Forces will finally zakhnet throughout Ukraine.

        Well, Petro Porosyonko is still in a drinking bout.wassat

        Pro moat Yatsenyuk post ... laughing
      4. Sasha_Sar 8 October 2015 17: 49 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        In alliance with the Khokhlov (emphasis on I), Mr. Yatsenyuk succeeded best in this
    2. Starover_Z 8 October 2015 11: 10 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      The Pentagon continues to analyze the objectives of Russian aviation in Syria, while adhering to the initial version that the objects subjected to shelling are not related to the “Islamic State”

      See the translation of the "curve". They want to say that the goals of Russian aviation are NOT THE GOALS OF ISIS!
      I think it will be more correct!
      And the goals of the IG are hospitals, weddings, funeral parties -
      Americans fly there, computer players, to them !!!
    3. Tor5
      Tor5 8 October 2015 11: 23 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Let's, let's, ananize!
    4. Tor5
      Tor5 8 October 2015 11: 24 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Well and well! It is equivalent - "I did not read Solzhenitsyna, but, I condemn!"
    5. Tor5
      Tor5 8 October 2015 11: 24 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Well and well! It is equivalent - "I did not read Solzhenitsyna, but, I condemn!"
    6. kizhe 8 October 2015 11: 49 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Yeah. And the wedding of Yemen, too, we tore into pieces!
    7. Cap-3 USSR 8 October 2015 12: 19 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Maybe they still have something to throw from the analyzes, let them pick.
    8. The comment was deleted.
    9. The comment was deleted.
  2. Lord of the Sith 8 October 2015 10: 59 New
    • 20
    • 0
    +20
    The analysis of the Pentagon report is not complete, but it is already clear that it is complete nonsense!
    1. Kent0001 8 October 2015 11: 03 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      The Pentagon is not able to do other reports.
    2. Scoun 8 October 2015 11: 03 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      Quote: Lord of the Sith
      Pentagon report analysis is not complete,

      collecting information from social networks))
      Quote: Lord of the Sith
      however, it’s already clear

      What network resources such as censor, faces and other rubbish)))
      ...... will give out the full and true nonsense! )))
    3. ROD VDVshny 8 October 2015 11: 06 New
      • 9
      • 0
      +9
      To explain which of them is who, who is moderate, and who is not very, the mattresses are not able to. It is for this reason that they refused to exchange intelligence with the Russian Federation. It’s a pity that Pskaki didn’t cheat on time ... she would have run away to the office and explained everything laughing
      1. lukewarm 8 October 2015 11: 23 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: PANEL VDVshny
        Pskaki didn’t cheat on time ..

        laughing Schaz has become fashionable among Westerners to ask for Russia. That would be the number if the mattress slut asked to the Crimea and more ... maternity capital
      2. Aksakal_07 8 October 2015 11: 35 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        To explain which of them is who, who is moderate, and who is not very, the mattresses are not able to.

        Very able to. Americans "mow" fools. They know perfectly well who is who in the Syrian "opposition". Only they would like the Russian Armed Forces to destroy only those "oppositionists" who "flew off the coils" and ceased to obey Washington curators, and, conversely, did not touch the "fighters" with the Bashar al-Assad regime.
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. The comment was deleted.
    6. The comment was deleted.
    7. The comment was deleted.
    8. sever.56 8 October 2015 11: 15 New
      • 15
      • 0
      +15
      Quote: Lord of the Sith
      Pentagon report analysis not complete



      http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2015/212/qujf736.png

      Now at the Pentagon, they are passing other tests ...
    9. The comment was deleted.
    10. Lelek 8 October 2015 11: 29 New
      • 9
      • 0
      +9
      Quote: Lord of the Sith
      The analysis of the Pentagon report is not complete, but it is already clear that it is complete nonsense!


      According to the logic of this ISBAL gang, this is the opposition supported by the Americans, and the 5 pupils who got lost somewhere (and actually switched to ISIS with weapons) were simply a misunderstanding, which spent $ 500.000.000 American Tugriks. Well, so in the crowd of bandits did not distinguish these five. We hit it on the bases, and not on individual basmachs.
      Advice to sir and sirukham - DO NOT HAVE, RUSSIA WORKS. stop
  3. Roman1970 8 October 2015 10: 59 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    According to the Pentagon representative, the coalition is “deeply concerned about any actions against moderate Syrian elements, since such actions on the part of the Russian Federation lead to the radicalization of the very elements that we (the United States) support.”
    Well, yes, train, give weapons, and "elements" in ISIS dump ...
  4. Meh-forester 8 October 2015 11: 00 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    According to the Pentagon representative, the coalition is “deeply concerned about any actions against moderate Syrian elements, since such actions on the part of the Russian Federation lead to the radicalization of the very elements that we (the United States) support.”
    The next step is to accuse Russia of creating the IG. In short, "blame everything from a bad mind to a healthy one."
    The question of the USA has already been asked - show the "moderate", let them enter into negotiation contact with the Assad authorities. And they will not touch them. So no, they don’t want not to show, not to recognize Assad’s legitimacy. For me, hard people are killing Syrian soldiers, cutting off their heads and carving hearts, as it does not pull on "moderation"
  5. vovanpain 8 October 2015 11: 01 New
    • 11
    • 0
    +11
    Yes, analyze what and whale whale anyone else, as long as you analyze, we are doing the business of making a terrogyug into the ground.
  6. Magic archer 8 October 2015 11: 01 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The Americans are simply ashamed to admit what we did in the week against Yigil more than they did in a week! Cool on their pride clicked! wink
  7. mig31 8 October 2015 11: 02 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    With State Department analyzes, the direct road to the madhouse ...
    1. tongilguk 8 October 2015 11: 45 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Hmm, intelligence is certainly on top of them. Apparently all the objects affected by them were ISIS objects. 2 excavators - we know for sure that they were managed by those who are now in ISIS, one ISIS was lying in the hospital, another came to the wedding. But Russia is bombing, don’t understand what. But for sure, those ISIS, which the states bombed among them were not.
  8. HAM
    HAM 8 October 2015 11: 03 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    When convenient- there is no "additional information about goals", and when especially convenient- the planes haven’t taken off yet, but the screech is already on, they hit the wrong ones.
  9. VseDoFeNi 8 October 2015 11: 04 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Baba Yaga against !!! Always AGAINST !!! laughing
  10. vorobey 8 October 2015 11: 05 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    There are no IG. The main thing is there are no weddings ..
  11. kil 31 8 October 2015 11: 05 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    We asked to show the goals. They analyze the goals of our aviation, because they themselves do not know anything in Syria. Here at least they will know something.
    1. avia1991 8 October 2015 11: 37 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Kil 31
      they don’t know anything in Syria

      Well, why they don’t know - they know! wink
      They analyze "in fact" when ours have already worked. And of course, they conclude that "ISIS is not there" - they really are not! The target is destroyed, the remnants of the bandits fled .. ALL! The conclusion is that "Russia hit" not there ".. wassat
  12. renics 8 October 2015 11: 06 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Yes, reasoning in the spirit of Merkelland, they themselves - then they know who is who. The fact is, today they can declare. that they are the lambs of Allah mimicking the good-natured and harmless Muslims who profess traditional Islam, and not Muslim fundamentalism in extreme form, and tomorrow when they feel their strength they will declare themselves as ISIS.
  13. Sargaras 8 October 2015 11: 06 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    I would not be surprised if it soon becomes known that the goals of Russian aviation are directly to the Pentagon and Kiev.
  14. Dimsanych 8 October 2015 11: 08 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    American slow-witted people once again continue to analyze and are worried that something has gone out of their control and passed into our control. Yes, in addition to ISIS (which is an American project), we squeeze out every shoucher from spiders that weave their nets there all over a foreign country, do their business there, drive Iraqi oil, rob and kill people, destroy cities and monuments of antiquity. And they are waiting for Assad to be demolished as soon as possible in order to arrange production of Syrian gas there for the whole of Europe, only to be extracted already with the help of American companies. Your shale didn’t work, so you decided to destroy the country and take everything from it. And in the event of your victory here and a hedgehog it is clear that our Gazprom deliveries will collapse, that oil will not rise in price until the Russian economy collapses and a coup in the country occurs. So everyone understands that on the territory of Syria we are not only helping disadvantaged people, that we are protecting the legitimate authority, but we are also fighting for our future, for the future of our country, in order to prevent the spread of striped infection for the Middle East, to our borders. HOW DO YOU REACH ALREADY AMERAS TUGODUMA !!!!!!!
  15. lopvlad 8 October 2015 11: 08 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    however, it is already clear that these are not IG objects

    please provide color photographs of ISIS facilities and at the same time tell us why during the years of coalition bombing by your coalition these objects were not destroyed even in the first phase of their construction by ISIS.
  16. pofigisst74 8 October 2015 11: 11 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    This does not lead to the radicalization of your elements, but to the destruction of terrorists. am
  17. V.ic 8 October 2015 11: 12 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    NATO Annalus is highly unreliable!
  18. Kirk 8 October 2015 11: 13 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Mattress covers bark under mattress covers, so we are doing everything right!
  19. 0255 8 October 2015 11: 13 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    “Nevertheless, it is obvious that Russia is striking in Syria in places where there is no IS. We continue to analyze these specific goals, ”she added.

    So they did not understand that Russia does not divide the Islamists into ISIS and the "moderate"? laughing
  20. kaban0072 8 October 2015 11: 14 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    The irritation of our overseas partners is quite understandable - we are "pecking" their brainchild ("moderate opposition"). The actions of the Russian Federation also seem to me to be quite logical and correct (although it is not for me to draw such conclusions with my witlessness)) - before the onset of the Assad government troops, it is necessary to numerically increase the ground grouping. The question is how to increase it without using your own ground forces? In addition to the Assad’s army itself, there are Iranian special forces (most likely it will be used pointwise in the most important areas), Hezbollah and .... and all. Thus, methodically suppressing the opposition from the air, we force them to be more accommodating in negotiations on joining forces in the fight against the Islamic State (news has already been sent about the active surrender of the so-called Syrian Free Army and a number of non-Islamic groupings). It seems likely that their further participation in the conflict is already on the side of the government army. What is the interest of the opposition? I think that the possibility of a further political settlement of the Syrian conflict against the background of the impossibility of further military confrontation. Well, our high-quality bombing intensified the thinking processes of these gentlemen)).
    And yes - there are still Kurdish formations that are also actively opposing the IS. Here, everything is somewhat more complicated - we lost a lot of time, not trying to involve them in solving Assad's problems. However, everything can be made up for, especially since the number and combat effectiveness of these formations is very, very impressive. You just need to put pressure on Assad. so that he would be more accommodating and would finally decide to give the Kurds something of a special status in Syria.
  21. The comment was deleted.
  22. SPB 1221 8 October 2015 11: 16 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    And the name of the representative is so natural, Balance. Here is the Balance from the bald, the bald and drives, what else to expect from her!
  23. V.ic 8 October 2015 11: 17 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    And the mattress mattresses themselves took information from ISIS that these creatures are exactly ISIS?
  24. AlexTires 8 October 2015 11: 18 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    It’s absolutely the same as the Pentagon claims. When they bombed Libya, too, they carried nonsense every day about the protection of civilians. In general, their opinion does not interest us. I expect the Western media to launch a campaign that ISIS is good. KhokhloSMI has already begun. Interestingly, the western one would ... it would gobble it up without choking ...
  25. BOB044 8 October 2015 11: 19 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Yes to bomb hospitals and doctors without borders. This is normal for them and the concomitant mistakes. They are afraid to admit that Russia is conducting the operation successfully. NATO will be broken in Syria.
  26. 33 Watcher 8 October 2015 11: 20 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Well, someone is holding Syrian cities with weapons in their hands, and this someone, not a government army, is bombing them. And about the analysis of goals, tell me honestly, a plug with intelligence.
  27. Stinger 8 October 2015 11: 23 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Urinalysis showed that not those whom the Americans would like to bomb. This became clear even before fecal analyzes.
  28. bubla5 8 October 2015 11: 23 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    From hamburgers, Americans brains swam
  29. Barboskin 8 October 2015 11: 24 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Forumites and Che resent ?! You didn’t understand that striking at the Islamic State is when it comes to hospitals, weddings and desiccators. But on military equipment, weapons depots, factories for the production of explosives, command bunkers, these are blows at a moderate opposition. bully
  30. Tor5
    Tor5 8 October 2015 11: 26 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Well well! Equally, “I didn’t read Solzhenitsyna, but I’m condemning you!”
  31. Nasty 8 October 2015 11: 29 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    "I am deeply concerned about any actions against moderate Syrian elements, since such actions by the Russian Federation lead to the radicalization of the very elements that we (the US) support."
    Yes, they would say bluntly- ISIS, since they were talking about the radicals. And we do not care that they are worried.
  32. MIKHAN 8 October 2015 11: 29 New
    • 12
    • 0
    +12
    Buttons are different .. and goals too ...!
  33. Imperial 8 October 2015 11: 30 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And if these are NATO facilities, how much will they analyze? Lisbon or Brussels will come to their senses)))
  34. AKESHA 8 October 2015 11: 34 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    ha ha ha well now it’s clear that they know all the objects of the ig but they themselves didn’t bombard the question of why America is for sale
  35. Alekseits 8 October 2015 11: 36 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    "I have not read the book, but I condemn everything written unanimously ..."
  36. 16112014nk 8 October 2015 11: 39 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    According to iksperds from the US, excavators should be the goals. And here they are right - they didn’t get into any excavator of the VKU of the Russian Federation.
  37. Wolka 8 October 2015 11: 39 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Yankees, it's time, oh it's time to get tested ...
  38. veksha50 8 October 2015 11: 44 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    "coalition" is deeply concerned about any actions against moderate Syrian elements, since such actions on the part of the Russian Federation lead to the radicalization of the very elements that we (USA) support"...

    Guys, I correctly understand that the states are afraid that the "radicalization" of the US-supported "Elements" will be the answer of their "cubs" to the states themselves like "what did you put us in ??? Nate, bastards, get !!!" .. .
  39. 123321 8 October 2015 11: 49 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Official Washington is trying to avoid the issue of the Caspian flotilla's missile strike on the positions of the IS terrorists. State Department representatives were briefed by reporters at the briefing. There are no official statements from the Pentagon either. It is only known that the Americans still do not want to join forces in the fight against IS. Having seen a strike by Russian cruise missiles on the IS, the representative of the State Department, Rear Admiral John Kirby did not believe his eyes. “I can’t confirm that the Russians did it at all, but Moscow is saying just that. Listen, I watched the video. And let Moscow say better what their military do. ”
  40. Arandir 8 October 2015 11: 51 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Because uh no. He is nowhere to be found. There is only a television picture. The same as a ram in a Pentagon civilian aircraft on 11/09/2001. There was a hole in the Pentagon, but they could not find the wreckage of the plane. Even turbines of refractory alloy engines have evaporated. Moreover, from the same kerosene on which these engines should work in normal mode.
    They will now write down the whole igil by the "moderate" opposition. They think they will at least beat Russia in their hands. Preventing her from fighting terrorism for the freedom of the country of Syria.
    Not those attacked.
  41. HMR333 8 October 2015 11: 52 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Penta-gon said that they read the inscription on the fence where it was said that Russia is bombing where there are no ig! just irrefutable evidence!)))
  42. Vadimsh 8 October 2015 11: 58 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Poor Michelle, where to go, where to go, all throwing and throwing (2 excavators do not let him sleep peacefully)
  43. kizhe 8 October 2015 12: 02 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Better to do an analysis of feces Obamke. Something he was completely emaciated. Probably worms.
  44. ARES623 8 October 2015 12: 04 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    They cannot analyze quickly. For a year now, they have not been able to deal with Boeing, even with fragments of ammunition. It is evident that it is difficult to pull a frog on an elephant. Everywhere some kind of inconsistency is formed in the conclusions. And in the case of the "gauges", some Amer experts went to "analyze" over the cesspool. Somehow it all happened very unexpectedly. But Iran and Iraq did not "merge" the coordination of the span - it inspires hope for the reliability of partners. But the Ukrainians once again proved themselves in the “best” form - they are trying to merge the pilots with bandits, replenish the ranks of PSs, and set out to launch anti-aircraft guns. Ukraine today is an open gangster state, and that’s all, along with the population. We'll have to converge in the "hot" - no pity, under the net, at the very root. So that only the soil remains. Let them already think where to emigrate.
  45. Anchonsha 8 October 2015 12: 07 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Pind-ss, who then has been bombing Russia for several days in a row, and as a result of which the bandits are scattering, trying to leave Syria? So this is the moderate opposition who are fighting with Assad on your bucks. We will smash such moderate ones and what difference does ISIS or other bandits
  46. roskot 8 October 2015 12: 20 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    What can I say here. It’s they who Psaki did not connect with her office. After her analysis, all the men in Russia fall out of laughter.
  47. iouris 8 October 2015 12: 42 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It was clearly said that first it is necessary to restore the sovereignty of the state, and then ... The "moderate" in Syria must prove their moderation and independence from external players and from ISIS. Fighting ISIS will become impossible if Assad falls.
  48. mvg
    mvg 8 October 2015 12: 54 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Each rocket is based on the Baksikoff lemon, I hope that commercial success is guaranteed. But the general tone of the comments cannot but rejoice .. And the statue of Liberty impressed. :-) By the way, our friends do not see the dash of the former tribesmen from the country of radishes and Raphaelok. I apologize for the lack of culture.
  49. INGVVAR 8 October 2015 13: 47 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I give a certain report on the offensive of the Syrian troops (source Live leaks)
    https://www.youtube.com/embed/mswOeuSJRqM
  50. Stariknv 8 October 2015 15: 08 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The United States first needs to do an analysis of its bombing and then do an analysis of Russian bombing.