NORAD: The challenge we face is Russian long-range aviation and cruise missiles

The head of the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), Admiral William Gortney, said that the latest Russian cruise missiles are a "very big challenge" for the US defense, as they allow long-range aviation Destroy targets in North America while remaining in the airspace of the Russian Federation.




The admiral noted that Russian long-range aviation is better than the Soviet, therefore, intercepting Russian missiles is much more difficult than intercepting Soviet strategic bombers.

“Cruise missiles are very effective, it’s very hard to defend against them, and this is a very big challenge for NORAD,” quotes Admiral Gortney, a former American aircraft carrier combat pilot, during the Atlantic Council in Washington RIA "News".

“The challenge we face is Russian long-range aviation and the threat of Russian cruise missiles from submarines and (other) underwater and surface platforms. This is a challenge, because for 57 years NORAD has been engaged in defense. It was assumed that Soviet or Russian long-range aviation is part of our combat space, and we must deal with them there, ”the NORAD commander noted.

According to the admiral, the Russian Federation has “qualitatively best forces”, compared with “the Armed Forces of the Soviet Union based on the numbers. They have a different doctrine. ”

"They deploy guided missiles that are very accurate and have a very large radius of action to such an extent that their long-range aviation can now not leave Russian airspace and use conventional nuclear warheads against targets and critical infrastructure in Canada, the United States and the North-West Pacific Coast (US and Canada), ”he added.

According to Gortney, "it makes us catch arrows instead of trying to shoot archers."
Photos used:
en.wikipedia.org
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

105 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. oleg-gr 8 October 2015 09: 47 New
    • 58
    • 0
    +58
    How poor and miserable we are, the admiral cried out. Give money, otherwise everything will be bad. The cunning Russians have updated their weapons, but we haven’t.
    1. vovanpain 8 October 2015 09: 49 New
      • 21
      • 0
      +21
      So think striped how else to beg for money.
      1. bulvas 8 October 2015 09: 52 New
        • 18
        • 0
        +18
        “The challenge that confronts us ...



        So sit at home and don’t poke around wherever they ask, no one “calls you” anywhere


        According to Gortney, "it makes us catch arrows instead of trying to shoot archers."


        America's favorite pastime is practicing eloquence in front of each other and blowing bubbles

        1. WKS
          WKS 8 October 2015 09: 58 New
          • 17
          • 0
          +17
          The challenge facing us is Russian long-range aviation and cruise missiles

          Yes, he is lying. Mandrave. A regional power cannot have such cruise missiles. And fireworks were launched from the Caspian.
          1. veksha50 8 October 2015 10: 52 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: wks
            And fireworks were launched from the Caspian.



            Chinese firecrackers have not yet launched ... That would have been a rumble throughout the BV !!!
          2. g1v2 8 October 2015 11: 03 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Exactly, exactly, Putin just launched fireworks on his birthday. laughing
        2. Alexey Lesogor 8 October 2015 11: 06 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          The expression is beautiful ...
        3. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. SSR
        SSR 8 October 2015 09: 54 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Quote: vovanpain
        Р'РѕС ‚Рё РґСѓРјР ° йте.

        And only citizens ruins tear farts with bricks, howling that it is fake and rockets fly only 300 km, their walnut is not able to understand what is export.
        Ps
        By the way, it’s they who give for export what is not in their own army (armored vehicles), we only had such a sitfigovina with Dryers 30
      4. WKS
        WKS 8 October 2015 09: 56 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        The challenge facing us is Russian long-range aviation and cruise missiles

        Yes, he is lying. Mandrave. A regional power cannot have such cruise missiles. And fireworks were launched from the Caspian.
        1. Polite Moose 8 October 2015 10: 30 New
          • 8
          • 0
          +8
          Quote: wks
          And fireworks were launched from the Caspian.


          This is the GDP of the DR salute fired. What else could one expect from a regional power with a torn economy?
          1. veksha50 8 October 2015 10: 54 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: Polite Moose
            This is the GDP of the DR salute fired.



            Let now the birthdays of Shoigu, Lavrov, Churkin are waiting ... Yes, and Zhirik too ... he will wash his boots, where necessary ...
      5. zeleznijdorojnik 8 October 2015 10: 51 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        noted that Russian long-range aviation is better than Soviet
        Not a pilot - a tanker. Explain to me why the current air force is much better than the USSR Air Force? Depreciation of most cars has increased, their number has decreased. The number of experienced pilots is also less than in the late Soviet years. Of course, over the past 5 years, both the training and the number of new cars have grown, but for me, they still have to saw and saw to the level of the USSR Air Force of the 89th year — like to cancer with China. Maybe I'm wrong - convince.
        1. veksha50 8 October 2015 10: 55 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Quote: zeleznijdorojnik
          Maybe I'm wrong - convince.



          For clarification, contact the Amer admiral ...
        2. Vladimir 1964 8 October 2015 11: 19 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Quote: zeleznijdorojnik
          Not a pilot - a tanker. Explain to me why the current air force is much better than the USSR Air Force? Depreciation of most cars has increased, their number has decreased. The number of experienced pilots is also less than in the late Soviet years. Of course, over the past 5 years, both the training and the number of new cars have grown, but for me, they still have to saw and saw to the level of the USSR Air Force of the 89th year — like to cancer with China. Maybe I'm wrong - convince.


          Dear zeleznijdorojnik, so the American answered you quite accurately.

          According to the admiral, the Russian Federation has “qualitatively best forces”, compared with “the Armed Forces of the Soviet Union based on the numbers. They have a different doctrine. ”


          As an example, you can use the situation with the SU-24, a fairly elderly glider, filled with modern filling and please, while reducing them (SU-24), the number, in comparison with the USSR, combat capabilities increased significantly.

          Something like this. hi
        3. Beaver 8 October 2015 11: 22 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: zeleznijdorojnik
          Explain to me why the current air force is much better than the USSR Air Force?

          It seems that this is just a Pindostanian variation on the theme "everything is gone, Obamasil".
          And here someone can explain to me such passage:
          their long-range aviation can now not leave the Russian airspace and use conventional nuclear warheads

          It is interesting that the admiral will scream when he learns about the capabilities of long-range aviation to use "unusual" nuclear warheads?
        4. aleks 62 next 8 October 2015 14: 43 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          .... Explain to me what the current air force is much better than the USSR Air Force? ...

          .... Quality .... Not always the quantity grows into quality .... Now 1 replaces 3-5 units in terms of efficiency ... But you are right .... I would like more quality .... :)))) )))
      6. The comment was deleted.
    2. Good me 8 October 2015 09: 50 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      NORAD: The challenge we face is Russian long-range aviation and cruise missiles

      Still sick of counting calls yes .
    3. svetoruss 8 October 2015 09: 52 New
      • 10
      • 0
      +10
      This is the beginning of hysteria, after yesterday's fireworks lol
    4. little girl15 8 October 2015 09: 53 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Huge surprise to the mattresses! Cache Mr. W. Gortney's turnip!
    5. andre 8 October 2015 09: 53 New
      • 9
      • 0
      +9
      I’m thinking that if there were 600 lard on the defense budget, would we have won the galaxy ?? am fellow
      1. Nyrobsky 8 October 2015 10: 20 New
        • 14
        • 0
        +14
        Quote: andre
        I’m thinking that if there were 600 lard on the defense budget, would we have won the galaxy ??

        Nooooo, we are modest and not greedy people. We don’t need a stranger, but we won’t give up our own either, and therefore, what kind of adversary will come to us will be greyhound and rake
    6. SRC P-15 8 October 2015 09: 55 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      The head of the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), Admiral William Gortney, said that the latest Russian cruise missiles are a "very big challenge" for the US defense,

      And for us, the biggest challenge is the United States, which surrounded us with its bases! And against this challenge, we have the latest cruise missiles and something else that the Americans know about and therefore sit evenly.
      That's how it was: it was only worth flapping wings to our cruise missiles, so the United States immediately in a panic. And we haven’t threatened you yet! smile
    7. Penetrator 8 October 2015 09: 56 New
      • 10
      • 0
      +10
      That is, they no longer consider the Strategic Missile Forces as a significant threat? Oh well...
      1. dauria 8 October 2015 10: 24 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        there were six continents ... where did the seventh come from? smile
        1. Penetrator 8 October 2015 10: 38 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          Quote: dauria
          there were six continents ... where did the seventh come from?

          After a nuclear strike, Eurasia will split into two continents, apparently so smile
          Or the chain of food stores "The Seventh Continent" is included in the list of priority goals. laughing
        2. V.ic 8 October 2015 10: 38 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: dauria
          there were six continents ... where did the seventh come from?

          Have you forgotten Ukraine? Not good, sir!
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. Yuyuka 8 October 2015 10: 56 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          You are an illiterate person! Our Great Ukrainian scientists have proved the existence of the mainland Hohlantida !!! am Pancake!!! and for whom is there a "zhovtoblakitnaya" button ??? belay
        5. Aleksey_K 8 October 2015 11: 01 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          Quote: dauria
          there were six continents ... where did the seventh come from?

          Many Russian citizens studied before 1991. At that time there were seven continents: Europe, Asia, S. America, South America, Africa, Australia and Antarctica. The liberals imposed on Russia that there are six continents, i.e. united Europe and Asia. But geologically these are different continental plates. In the zone of their docking, during the collision, the Ural Mountains formed. During a geological cataclysm, if, for example, a comet falls, a fault and catastrophic earthquakes and the formation of volcanoes can occur in the Ural Mountains.
          The liberals are imposing on us a lot of things; Russian scientists, traitors, are imposing this on us for dollars, as truth.
          1. qQQQ 8 October 2015 11: 15 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: Алексей_К
            Many Russian citizens studied before 1991. At that time there were seven continents: Europe, Asia, S. America, South America, Africa, Australia and Antarctica. The liberals imposed on Russia that there are six continents, i.e. united Europe and Asia.


            I’ll tell you a “terrible” secret: in the 70s they taught that there were 6 continents, probably already there were liberals. And about 7 continents were taught somewhere up to the 50s maybe a little more.
          2. qQQQ 8 October 2015 11: 15 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: Алексей_К
            Many Russian citizens studied before 1991. At that time there were seven continents: Europe, Asia, S. America, South America, Africa, Australia and Antarctica. The liberals imposed on Russia that there are six continents, i.e. united Europe and Asia.


            I’ll tell you a “terrible” secret: in the 70s they taught that there were 6 continents, probably already there were liberals. And about 7 continents were taught somewhere up to the 50s maybe a little more.
          3. dauria 8 October 2015 13: 49 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Many Russian citizens studied before 1991.


            Being a citizen of the USSR, I "crammed" 6 parts of the world in Europe, Asia, America (in its entirety) .... And 6 continents - Eurasia, S. America, Yu. America .... Liberals were not delivered in 70g. But the Colorado potato beetle has already appeared smile

            But I like the idea. Spilling them. Stalin instead of the USA - And Central, North and South America. You look and infection (Colorado beetles and liberals) we will decrease
          4. Vlad2010_vlad 9 October 2015 09: 30 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Even in the Soviet school curriculum there were no such continents as Europe and Asia, there was always a single continent EURASIA. And you are talking about parts of the world.
        6. veksha50 8 October 2015 11: 01 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: dauria
          where is the seventh from?



          After the Caspian strike, Atlantis surfaced ...
    8. vorobey 8 October 2015 09: 57 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: oleg-gr
      The cunning Russians updated their weapons, but we didn’t.


      quote- "the threat of Russian cruise missiles from submarines and (other) submarine and surface platforms."

      Other submarine platforms ... is there something we still don’t know about? or fear has big eyes ..
    9. The comment was deleted.
    10. marlin1203 8 October 2015 09: 58 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      "Mani, mani, mani! .." The best "bred" in the world are American generals. As much as they give out from the state budget, our "corrupt officials" never dreamed of.
      1. V.ic 8 October 2015 10: 39 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: marlin1203
        how much they give out from the state budget, our "corrupt officials" never dreamed of.

        And Anatoly Eduardovich does not count?
    11. Meh-forester 8 October 2015 10: 03 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: oleg-gr
      How poor and miserable we are, the admiral cried out. Give money, otherwise everything will be bad. The cunning Russians have updated their weapons, but we haven’t.

      He only counted the missiles on the bombers, at the next stage there will be submarine missiles, then mine-based missiles and, OH HORROR, mobile ... In short, the defense department’s budget can be “inflated” ... Our Serdyukov, full ... manager. Here's how to make money.
    12. vodolaz 8 October 2015 10: 08 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      I look at the mattresses very painfully when they realize that they can get Lyuli. At first they got used to iron everything from afar, and then to go down the earth. And here the Chinese are so inappropriately with their missiles that the aircraft carriers can get and, importantly, also sink.
    13. Tor5
      Tor5 8 October 2015 10: 09 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Money, money and more money! Otherwise, it will be very bad for us, oh-oh-oh!
    14. Tor5
      Tor5 8 October 2015 10: 09 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Money, money and more money! Otherwise, it will be very bad for us, oh-oh-oh!
    15. chunga-changa 8 October 2015 14: 05 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      "The blow delivered by the Caspian flotilla until now cannot be repeated by more than one of our fleets, including the ocean ones, and this is only 1/3 of the salvo of one American destroyer."
      .ttp: //nortwolf-sam.livejournal.com/1050464.html
    16. GSH-18 8 October 2015 14: 15 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      "They deploy guided missiles that are very accurate and have a very large radius of action to such an extent that their long-range aviation can now not leave Russian airspace and use conventional nuclear warheads against targets and critical infrastructure in Canada, the United States and the North-West Pacific Coast (US and Canada), ”he added.

      There is a clear fright. The CIA’s shortcomings in Russia have recently become a parable in languages. They slammed the Crimea, now the deployment of the Russian strike air group in Sria. And the latest, latest Russian caliber cruise missiles! AMERICANS messed up on the range and accuracy of our new weapon belay
      This is a buzz! good
    17. sanches-nk 8 October 2015 15: 19 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Of course I liked you bro, but the Admiral is right and said everything about the case.
  2. Air Force captain 8 October 2015 09: 47 New
    • 12
    • 0
    +12
    On October 7, a tectonic shift occurred in the consciousness of the “exceptional” .... aftershocks continue
    1. INVESTOR 8 October 2015 09: 50 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Yes guys, Russia is not Zimbabwe for you.
    2. SPACE 8 October 2015 09: 54 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: Captain Air Force
      7 October in the consciousness of the "exceptional" there was a tectonic shift

      Admiral William Gortney said that the latest Russian cruise missiles are a "very big challenge" for the US defense, as it allows long-range aviation to destroy targets in North America, while remaining in the airspace of the Russian Federation.

      Well, the cruise missile “hit” the Pentagon.
      Z.Y. In general, this event, says a lot and not only in the military aspect, like the tip of the iceberg, much remains behind the scenes. Excellent performance speaks of good planning, surprise of high efficiency, all together in a new light shows the economy, industry, the army, the leadership of the state and even parliament)))
    3. veksha50 8 October 2015 11: 05 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Quote: Captain Air Force
      On October 7, a tectonic shift occurred in the consciousness of the "exceptional" ...



      Well this is necessary, as Putin made the top American remember his birthday !!!

      When is Putin's birthday? And this is when Russia, unexpectedly from an unexpected place, turned an unexpected weapon against an unexpected target that was within her reach ... Well, very close to the hodgepodge of a coalition of 65 (!!!) states ...
      1. Yuyuka 8 October 2015 12: 52 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        good a small addition - now they’ll look forward to Putin’s birthday “impatience” - after all, obscurity is the worst, because Putin is so unpredictable belay you never know what he will ask for a birthday! and the round date is finally a complete paragraph! repeat By the way, it would be time for Saakashvili to launch the issue of “ties of his own name” - the special demand will be before the president’s birthday! lol
  3. RBLip 8 October 2015 09: 48 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    ahhh Caspian "gifts" made the mattresses to sign. God forbid our Airborne Forces to see in business - they will begin to repent ... wink
    1. vorobey 8 October 2015 09: 51 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: RBLip
      God forbid them to see our Airborne Forces in business - repent


      In Kosovo, they already intersected .. and more than once .. so you don’t get used to writing ... I’m ashamed but what can you do - there is no choice .. hi
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Good me 8 October 2015 09: 54 New
      • 9
      • 0
      +9
      Quote: RBLip
      ahhh Caspian "gifts" made the mattresses to sign. God forbid our Airborne Forces to see in business - they will begin to repent ...


      Washington reaction illustration.
      1. veksha50 8 October 2015 10: 50 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Good I
        Washington reaction illustration



        The toilet is a pity ... Obama is not ...
        1. Good me 8 October 2015 10: 59 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: veksha50
          The toilet is a pity ... Obama is not ...

          Obama, a zealot for gay rights, has no pity for us. IT, it is “designed” so that everything comes in and out easily ...

  4. ohotnik101 8 October 2015 09: 48 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    This is called "realized." Now let's talk in a different tone.
    1. sl22277 8 October 2015 10: 23 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      This is how we celebrated the president’s birthday. There was also no reason for a “call”, but it was already done. Did it finally reach Washington that a direct conflict between Russia and the USA is suicide? I think yesterday, especially for the "especially gifted", there was a demonstration of the possibility of Russia, and that's not all ....
  5. Rurikovich 8 October 2015 09: 50 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    After such a statement, another hysteria in the media and a possible increase in the Pentagon's military budget should flare up to level out a possible threat ... what Causal relationship: a threat is drawn, a search for overcoming it request
    If only the navel wouldn’t get loose ... lol
  6. Barboskin 8 October 2015 09: 50 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Whether there will still be oh-oh-oh! We just started and they were already confused! They will start mushrooms again as in Ukraine, we have not yet introduced an army, but they have already lost the Crimea, aviation has been destroyed, the army has been battered!
    1. veksha50 8 October 2015 11: 31 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Barboskin
      They will start mushrooms again as in Ukraine, we have not yet entered the army, but they have already lost the Crimea, the aircraft have been destroyed, the army is battered!



      Urkaina lost everything but her meanness ...

      Look, in the morning it’s already on the news feeds that Urkaina is preparing to equip the Syrian opposition forces with air defense systems and specialists ... In the same way, Urkaina arrived on 08.08.08, when our planes were shot down over Georgia by air defense systems and calculations. provided by Urkaina ...
  7. Denis DV 8 October 2015 09: 50 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Well, as always - give me money! laughing
  8. MIKHAN 8 October 2015 09: 51 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    This is still 2014 ..... Well prepared!
    Everything flies and works clearly ... Checked!
  9. FID
    FID 8 October 2015 09: 51 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    The admiral noted that Russian long-range aviation is better than the Soviet, therefore, intercepting Russian missiles is much more difficult than intercepting Soviet strategic bombers.



    I did not understand this at all ... And the planes (Tu-160, Tu-95, Tu-22M) are the same, and the missiles are the same ...
    1. DIVAN SOLDIER 8 October 2015 09: 54 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Shorter than the psaki of the brain.
      1. veksha50 8 October 2015 11: 35 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
        psaki brain.



        Someone can already defend a dissertation on this subject ...
    2. andj61 8 October 2015 10: 13 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: SSI
      I did not understand this at all ... And the planes (Tu-160, Tu-95, Tu-22M) are the same, and the missiles are the same ...

      That's right - but the Pentagon has a new budget every year. fellow
      That justifies the new spending. Nothing personal just business! bully hi
    3. veksha50 8 October 2015 11: 34 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: SSI
      I did not understand it at all ...


      The admiral himself did not understand what he was talking about ...

      However, the message is clear - Russia is ahead of us in armaments, give us money, and the more the better ...
    4. retardu 8 October 2015 12: 07 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Well, yes, it’s also unclear why this nagging.
      The missiles are the same, the caliber range was announced 3 years ago.
      They have the same missiles, which is not clear why.
    5. Anchonsha 8 October 2015 12: 15 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Yes, it seems that the pin-wasps panicked, it doesn’t fit in their head that someone could be cooler than them, which now have to be reckoned with, and not flaunt and supposedly not notice. But you understood this a long time ago with the advent of Putin’s politics, you felt like Kashchei your death
    6. SIvan 8 October 2015 14: 32 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      I did not understand this at all ... And the planes (Tu-160, Tu-95, Tu-22M) are the same, and the missiles are the same ...

      Well, like the X-101 - a new rocket? And all kinds of calibers. Although they are not strategic, they are dangerous.
    7. Vlad2010_vlad 9 October 2015 09: 32 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Aircraft modernized. A missile in Syria is a Russian development.
  10. A-Sim 8 October 2015 09: 52 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Lies. The "Head of the Command of the Aerospace Defense of North America (NORAD)" cannot not have all the information about the weapons of the enemy and not report about it earlier, not to take retaliatory measures, etc. Otherwise - it is not in its place.
    It seemed to me that he was a little scared.
    And by the way, in his opinion, missile defense does not exist.
    1. HAM
      HAM 8 October 2015 10: 06 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      It’s one thing for Santa Claus to follow, and trumpet about it, it’s another thing to have problems from a real opponent — you’ll get scared here!
  11. DIVAN SOLDIER 8 October 2015 09: 52 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The cowardly pi indos would be silent, since the Soviet weapons are of less quality, that you would have torn 90 in such a way that you could get our defense technology.
    1. A-Sim 8 October 2015 09: 53 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Now, if they had been hit in the 90s, then their whole "Hollywood" image would have been dispelled.
  12. nagel_Oz 8 October 2015 09: 53 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Oh, how it smells like another cut of the American budget !!
    Respect well done Putin! He showed Europeans the "long arm" of Moscow. Let the geyevropa not be deceived, the answer will fly.
  13. aszzz888 8 October 2015 09: 53 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    “Cruise missiles are very effective, it’s very difficult to defend against them, and this is a very big challenge for NORAD,” admiral Gortney quotes


    What, already flowed through the pants!?!

    Well, these are just flowers, although very beautiful, but the rest AHEAD!
  14. S_Baykala 8 October 2015 09: 54 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Not so long ago, during the visit of Shoigu to Latin American countries, there were thoughts (dreams) that it would be nice to build a missile base in Cuba to educate the staff. Reality exceeded expectations and dreams. It turned out that the base is actually not needed. If I correctly understood the performance characteristics of new missiles, then almost any surface and underwater military vessel can become their carrier. Given that the vast majority of the US state live near the coast, hysteria is supposed to be awesome. There is a boat on a friendly visit to Cuba and at the same time with it a circle crawls on the map, half the size of the states .... And another one is walking along the Pacific Ocean ....
    Ps The strongest side of the states - invulnerability due to maritime borders may be its weakness.
    1. veksha50 8 October 2015 11: 37 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: S_Baykala
      ps The strongest side of the states - invulnerability due to maritime borders may turn out to be its weakness.



      This is equally true for Naglia's viper ...
  15. ramzes1776 8 October 2015 09: 54 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Another thing would be to kick the Club under the guise of a regular container from some civilian cargo ship. Then the mattresses will be shocked and awed.
  16. Russian German 8 October 2015 09: 54 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    It would be nice now for the Foreign Ministry to make a statement and say that we do not understand the concerns of the United States. Our missile systems (by analogy with their missile defense) are not aimed at the United States!
  17. brisk 8 October 2015 09: 55 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Already managed to declare? Praise to Russian cruise missiles !! Give hypersonic 6 Mach !!
  18. Darkoff
    Darkoff 8 October 2015 09: 56 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    That's what real combat use means! In exercises, they shoot and shoot, and, except for experts, no one pays attention. It was worth once (26 times) to shy away at the cordon - wu ala! The whole world knows, down to every ordinary citizen of the NATO member countries.
  19. LVMI1980 8 October 2015 09: 57 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    And we warned
    (judging by the file date, saved from the network on September 22) soldier
    1. Oladushkin 8 October 2015 10: 34 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Then it turns out that NATO headquarters should flee to the south of Portugal :) to avoid our cruise missiles .... I will write again, it's nice .... OUR cruise missiles ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
      1. Bombardier 8 October 2015 11: 52 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Bombardier
        and after yesterday, like this:


        all morning problems with this site, and now does not allow you to insert a map ......
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. Alexey Lesogor 8 October 2015 11: 12 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      There are not enough radii from the Caspian. It would be more obvious.
      1. Bombardier 8 October 2015 12: 03 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Alexey Lesogor
        There are not enough radii from the Caspian. It would be more obvious.


        I just wanted to lay out this card.
  20. leks 8 October 2015 09: 57 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Gentlemen, the "Americans" realized that their idea of ​​an instant global strike on enemy territories received a direct competitor in the form of our 3M14 Caliber cruise missiles, so gentlemen now know that we can also respond from our territory with a non-nuclear strike on your strategic targets.
    Our only minus is the number of carriers of such missiles and the number of missiles themselves, but this is a matter for the near future, after such an effective application, we will make them like sausages.
  21. samara-58 8 October 2015 09: 58 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    AND YOU, NAGLESS YANKIS, "THINK THAT" DOUBLE ONLY YOU HAVE? .. THINK !!! fool
  22. 2224460 8 October 2015 09: 59 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    NORAD: The challenge we face is Russian long-range aviation and cruise missiles
    These de-malachol bills still live in fears of the Cold War. The whole country has a terrible dream about hundreds of rockets and planes launched from faraway Russia by heavily drunk fighting "bears"
  23. solovey 8 October 2015 09: 59 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Beehives, it not only makes you catch arrows, but makes you think well whether it is NECESSARY or NECESSARY to stir up the bear’s den wink
  24. oleggun 8 October 2015 10: 04 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The Anglo-Saxons have a hard butt on our VKS and missiles ... and it's nice)
  25. Cynic 8 October 2015 10: 08 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    To them, what began to reach, their screams _ The Russians are coming, is it time to change to _ The Russians are flying? Moreover, not for the purpose of annually knocking out appropriations to the budget (routine), but for specific projects for which they will be asked, and not weakly asked. In general, they shouted, frightened their Russian threat.
  26. paxil 8 October 2015 10: 10 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Quote: andre
    I’m thinking that if there were 600 lard on the defense budget, would we have won the galaxy ?? am fellow

    So that’s the whole point that you need to maintain more than 900 bases all over the world; no budget is enough for this.
  27. Mountain shooter 8 October 2015 10: 11 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    As Bismarck said there: "I know a hundred ways to raise a bear from a den, and not one how to drive him back!"
    Well, what, before experimenting? How long did the stick have to be taken to tease a Russian bear?
  28. barclay 8 October 2015 10: 11 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    “The challenge that confronts us is the Russian long-range aviation and the threat of Russian cruise missiles from submarines and (other) submarine and surface platforms.

    This is not a challenge. We are peaceful people, but ...
    An urgent need to object to the release of new White Swans. This will be the most powerful fist for the hegemon.
  29. Zomanus 8 October 2015 10: 14 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Missiles may not be much better.
    Carriers too.
    The target designation and tracking to the target simply improved.
    Obviously, the Americans will not succeed now everywhere and rub everything about their awesome tomahawks.
    But we also have a container version of such missiles, which the Americans will soon remember.
    And from submarines almost any of them can be shot.
    So America will have to seriously rethink its doctrines.
  30. shimus 8 October 2015 10: 16 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: oleg-gr
    How poor and miserable we are, the admiral cried out. Give money, otherwise everything will be bad. The cunning Russians have updated their weapons, but we haven’t.

    They contradict themselves !!! Obama announced to the whole World, "The Russian economy is torn to shreds ...", and here you have super-modern missiles ... How can a country with a torn economy afford it?
    :) Yankees in neuropsychiatric collapse !!!
  31. Strezhevchanin 8 October 2015 10: 20 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Quote: Good I
    Washington reaction illustration

    I doubt that they managed to run away, full pants ballast a hundred pounds)))
  32. roskot 8 October 2015 10: 25 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Arrows are like arrows. Stock up on nets if you can help. And we have enough archers.
  33. DMB3000 8 October 2015 10: 27 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Quote: oleg-gr
    How poor and miserable we are, the admiral cried out. Give money, otherwise everything will be bad. The cunning Russians have updated their weapons, but we haven’t.

    this is our Russian aspen stake (dot)
  34. BOB044 8 October 2015 10: 31 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    NORAD: The challenge we face is Russian long-range aviation and cruise missiles
    Here is NATO and St. George’s Day. Buy diapers and do not shout that you are the owners of the earth. So you will live peacefully longer. And then it’s not an hour’s time for yourself to experience what ISIS is now experiencing. We do not threaten or threaten anyone. We just say live calmly and it will cost you less. hi
  35. mpzss 8 October 2015 10: 34 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: LVMI1980
    And we warned
    (judging by the file date, saved from the network on September 22) soldier

    judging by the map, it is necessary to create the Turkish Autonomous Okrug, as part of Russia!
  36. Alex_59 8 October 2015 10: 40 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    And how at one time they scolded the 21631 project! "Under-ship", there is no own control system, no anti-aircraft defense, no anti-ship missiles. Screaming cut, rollback! A-I-I-th, that drives Zelenodolsky Shipyard to our poor sailors!

    Suddenly, the 21631 ships became the most efficient, useful and most “waged” Navy ships ...
  37. x.andvlad 8 October 2015 10: 42 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    "It makes us catch arrows instead of trying to shoot archers."
    Exactly. And each caught, and not caught (and there will be much more) will cost the "hegemon" very expensive.
  38. Batia 8 October 2015 10: 43 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Ah, what a pleasant cry! Balm for the soul. Just a bit and squeeze 3,14 dos.
  39. m-arsenich 8 October 2015 10: 45 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: andre
    I’m thinking that if there were 600 lard on the defense budget, would we have won the galaxy ??


    Do not buzz a fly! ...
  40. russmensch 8 October 2015 10: 45 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    I often had to read the posts of various foreign and our “analysts. Almost all of them considered the possibility of confrontation between the USA and the Russian Federation. And almost all agreed on one thing - Russia will be defeated. Examples of Desert Storm were given, our lag in aviation was presented with a smart look, artillery, small arms and other types of weapons. The latter provided almost mathematical proof of our lag of precision weapons by 30 years. And sometimes it was difficult for me to disagree and not believe in it. And now Russia has shown everything. In fact, in Syria according to their opinion, “unfinished” planes appeared and the Americans were immediately forced to coordinate the sorties of their aircraft. Well, albeit to avoid ... but then went sighting bombing with astonishing accuracy. The question immediately arises - it's still “smart” ammunition which Are we absent or highly trained personnel? Both of them are "unexpected" for amers. And then there is a "holiday gift" flight of 26 KR. 1500 km with a landing accuracy of 3 meters. In my opinion this is the finish. Where are the analysts? ...
  41. veksha50 8 October 2015 10: 49 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    "Cruise missiles are very effective, it’s very difficult to defend against them, and this is a very big challenge for NORAD" ...


    The Russian sailors were dumbfounded, and the Amer pilots managed it ... and they became afraid of Russian long-range aviation ...

    Correctly, the American says - THEM (i.e., ours) - ANOTHER STRATEGY !!! Mind Russia-do not understand ...

    There is an interaction between our arms and types of troops, which we ourselves did not think about ......

    PS We are a threat to NORAD !!! And your missile defense and plans for a global strike on Russia - is that the Nuland cookies ???
    And the decision today to supply lethal (supposedly defensive) weapons to Urkaine is a threat to anyone ???
  42. Brigadier 8 October 2015 10: 50 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    As soon as we began to grow stronger, the creatures immediately twitched ... It became scary! Well, how will Russia take it, and will not tolerate any next Amero-Geyropov dirty trick the next time ... soldier
  43. kizhe 8 October 2015 10: 51 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    One lesson, another science.
  44. SPB 1221 8 October 2015 10: 52 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Cool situation, when the “Challenge” appeared in front of the states, the “Answer” stopped for the mattresses!
  45. Oman 47 8 October 2015 10: 52 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Maybe it will soon reach the Psheks: the missile defense base on their territory is a “magnet” for our cruise and other missiles. bully
  46. Prutkov 8 October 2015 10: 53 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: dauria
    there were six continents ... where did the seventh come from? smile

    And Atlantis is not considered?
  47. kizhe 8 October 2015 10: 53 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    One lesson, another science.
  48. interceptor58 8 October 2015 11: 00 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It’s necessary to get the Meteorite from the suseks, then they’ll swell at all.
  49. Old26 8 October 2015 11: 01 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: SSI
    The admiral noted that Russian long-range aviation is better than the Soviet, therefore, intercepting Russian missiles is much more difficult than intercepting Soviet strategic bombers.

    I did not understand this at all ... And the planes (Tu-160, Tu-95, Tu-22M) are the same, and the missiles are the same ...

    Yes, here and think what he wanted to say. In principle, another attempt to promote their legislators to increase the budget is nothing new. All this has already passed several times: both the bombing threat and the missile

    Quote: Batia
    Ah, what a pleasant cry! Balm for the soul. Just a bit and squeeze 3,14 dos.

    As it turns out, a person needs little to be happy. It turns out the performance of the American admiral, who saw the opportunity to get more dough on this. And for the sake of increasing the budget - they will say that slingshots will be dangerous, because it’s impossible to intercept stones and a new system is needed. A regular performance with one goal is to receive additional appropriations. And do not care that all this is sewn with white thread. What Russia has applied is nothing supreme in this. Similar Cr in one form or another, we have HZ for how many years. Like the Americans. But there is an opportunity - why not take advantage. And we immediately begin to speak again. that Americans begin to fear with bricks ... bricks ...

    Well, for us, in order to squeeze them, we need to raise our own economy, and not rejoice at the statements. That's when there will be an economy, there will be new plants, development and discovery of new deposits, when there will be our own passenger liners (I’m not talking about cars), when we will export not only raw materials, but also high-tech products, and civilian, and not just military, then You can dream that we will press.
    And when we sit on a gas-oil needle, then a collapse in the prices of these "products" can squeeze us, not Americans
  50. Lelek 8 October 2015 11: 02 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    “They deploy guided missiles that are very accurate and have a very large range to such an extent that their long-range aviation can now not leave Russian airspace and use conventional nuclear warheads against targets and critical infrastructure in Canada, the United States and the Northwest Pacific coast (USA and Canada) »

    What did you think (gas station, regional country, etc.). Scratch your turnips and sit still in your overlook. You will not run up and we will be polite.
    I copied the map with Yaplakal: