Military Review

Academy of Strategic Missile Forces introduced anti-cumulative protection for the launcher

16
The Military Academy of the Strategic Missile Forces presented at the exhibition "Innovation Day of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation" a "bullet-proof vest" for the launcher of the missile complex, reports MIC with reference to Interfax-AVN.


Military Academy of the Strategic Missile Forces named after Peter the Great

"Anti-cumulative and anti-bullet protection includes deflecting elements in the form of shock-absorbing nets, steel screen 5-10 of millimeters thick, additional wall made of porous ceramics"- told the representative of the Academy.

According to him, “when firing bullets rifle weapons the grid turns them around the longitudinal axis, then when they hit the screen, the angle of impact changes, and the bullet loses its penetrating ability 3-5 times. If a grenade hits the body armor, it just explodes before it reaches the protected object. ”

The interviewee noted that "such protection can also be used for the defense of structures with explosive materials."
Photos used:
RIA News. Sergey Pyatakov
16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch 7 October 2015 17: 33 New
    +8
    Нормально мы двинулись , больше "конверсионное самонаводящееся мыло" , образно выражаясь , не разрабатываем , как пятнистый мечтал .
    1. Beaver
      Beaver 7 October 2015 17: 40 New
      27
      Нашим "Кулибиным" главное не мешать, они такое изобретут - писатели-фантасты лопнут от зависти. belay
      1. ssn18
        ssn18 7 October 2015 19: 15 New
        +9
        The main thing is to prevent the redhead from this, otherwise everything will be cut and sold.
    2. lelikas
      lelikas 7 October 2015 17: 41 New
      15
      Защита вещь хорошая , но если по передвижному комплексу МКБР стреляют из ручного оружия - значит " что то пошло не так ".
      1. Asadullah
        Asadullah 7 October 2015 17: 55 New
        +4
        но если по передвижному комплексу МКБР стреляют из ручного оружия - значит " что то пошло не так


        smile Do not shoot. But they allow the opportunity, and suddenly they shoot. Apparently, they exclude the possibility of incapacitating a complex at the cost of hundreds of millions, with actions of a couple of dollars.
        1. andr327
          andr327 7 October 2015 18: 20 New
          -1
          Then it’s not easier to make an underground concrete bunker!
          And if you put such crap on the APU, then what will be the mass of the unit. She is not small now. and if deployed in a field position, then covering the APU you need to enclose it with this five-meter fence 25x7m in a circular. Do not look everywhere wedge.
          1. serega.fedotov
            serega.fedotov 7 October 2015 19: 35 New
            0
            Quote: andr327
            Then it’s not easier to make an underground concrete bunker!

            So, not the whole building will be covered, but only important areas.
            У нас в Саратове местность сплошные балки,перелески и болотца с 2-3 метровым камышом Какой нибуть отморозок с "мухой"вполне может подобраться на дистанцию выстрела Тем более,что дорог от Светлого пригодных для "тополей"не так много-выпасти можно!
            Я конечно понимаю от РПГ на "тополе\ярсе" максимум топливо ракеты вспыхнет-ядрен-батон гарантированно не сработает,но вот вони запад подымет,да и наши подпевалы от визга охрипнут,
            And most importantly, a damaged installation minus one rocket for the Yusovites!
  2. Vladimirets
    Vladimirets 7 October 2015 17: 34 New
    +5
    Instead of the front door of the Strategic Missile Forces Academy, it would be more interesting to see the product itself. yes
  3. andr327
    andr327 7 October 2015 17: 45 New
    -5
    And it already looks like ukroboronprom, and even it becomes not funny. SHOW !!!
    am
  4. raid14
    raid14 7 October 2015 17: 53 New
    +5
    I’m translating it into Russian: the structure is a metal mesh, a RE lattice screen and a ceramic dispersion panel installed behind it at an angle of 60-70% of normal (this inclined armor was used on T-34 tanks)
    1. shasherin.pavel
      shasherin.pavel 7 October 2015 18: 00 New
      +3
      Quote: raid14
      this inclined armor was used on T-34 tanks)

      but the inclined armor did not help against the cumulative explosion. It looks like it's just a fake. Complete nonsense.
      1. raid14
        raid14 7 October 2015 18: 15 New
        +1
        Read correctly, met. the grid and the electronic devices are installed first for remote operation of the piezoelectric bomb or the destruction of rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs), then the ceramic panel ensures the retention of the pest of CS and fragments.
    2. andr327
      andr327 7 October 2015 18: 02 New
      -2
      And what is its size, and how does it look during examination in various spectra? Isn't it easier to put a radio beacon on the APU with a laser?
      1. ssn18
        ssn18 7 October 2015 19: 22 New
        0
        For an hour, are you not going to put the beacon on the APU yourself with a laser?
  5. Maxom75
    Maxom75 7 October 2015 18: 03 New
    +2
    Strange decision? What blocks are so poorly protected? From bullets and grenades, but where is the cordon then, and what does it do?
  6. carabiner sks
    carabiner sks 7 October 2015 18: 19 New
    0
    Quote: Maxom75
    Strange decision? What blocks are so poorly protected? From bullets and grenades, but where is the cordon then, and what does it do?

    From the sniper and saboteur cordon does not protect.
    1. Maxom75
      Maxom75 7 October 2015 20: 32 New
      +1
      strange, but before somehow defended.
  7. bronik
    bronik 7 October 2015 18: 35 New
    0
    Our PRTB (mobile missile and technical base) was guarded by tanks, anti-aircraft guns, infantry, and we could not even dream of such protection.
  8. ssn18
    ssn18 7 October 2015 19: 25 New
    +1
    It is written by those who do not have the slightest idea about the protection and defense of the BSP, PUBSP and PBSP, not to mention the work of intelligence and counterintelligence.
  9. NDR-791
    NDR-791 7 October 2015 19: 42 New
    +1
    Quote: lelikas
    Защита вещь хорошая , но если по передвижному комплексу МКБР стреляют из ручного оружия - значит " что то пошло не так ".

    This is really so !!! If it came to this, then you can no longer take a steam bath - they won’t let the rocket fly. And one more thing: how much does it weigh ??? Mnogososniki-powerful cars, but there is a limit to everything! Here is the last point, in my opinion, much closer to the truth. “Similar protection can also be used to defend structures with explosive materials.” . This applies to weapons depots in the first place. Until recently, some grandfathers with three rulers guarded some wood-earthen warehouses of anti-aircraft defense facilities (I DO NOT LIE !!!).
    1. ssn18
      ssn18 7 October 2015 20: 01 New
      0
      "У нас до недавнего времени некоторые древоземляные склады объектов ПВО охраняли дедушки с трёхлинейками."

      So they still meet.
    2. Moore
      Moore 8 October 2015 04: 29 New
      0
      This is really so !!! If it came to this, then you can no longer take a steam bath - they won’t let the rocket fly. And one more thing: how much does it weigh ??? Mnogososniki-powerful cars, but there is a limit to everything!

      The developers, without batting an eye, will say: shit-question, we’ll include another MAZ besides MIOM in the complex and carry a miracle defense in the wagon train. And an extra hour to expand / collapse, and other uninteresting things - God will forgive.
      Не удивлюсь, если это на вооружение таки примут, хотя когда учился вон в том здании на картинке, говорили, что ТПК "Тополя-М" в районе второй ступени держит пулю ПК 7,62 (врали наверное, раз решили допзащиту делать).
      За свою службу встречал немало забавных приказов про усиление охраны и защищённости АПУ. Ну например, чего стоил приказ воздвигнуть с внешних сторон "Крон" бревенчатые стены высотой 7-8 м и обваловать их землёй, или посадить около каждой "Кроны" по сторожевой собаке. В первом случае никто не озаботился уточнить указиловку хотя бы маленьким чертёжиком и расчётом, а во втором тупоголовым военным чинушам даже в голову не пришло параллельно указиловке ввести приказом штаты "собачьей" службы, выделить деньги на закупку собак, оборудование мест их содержания и поставить их на довольствие.
      But I still consider the most masterpiece to be a ban on the issuance of ammunition to military guard posts and arming them with whistles. It was assumed that in the event of an attack, they would, whistling, retreat to a position - and there already the enemy would be met by miracle heroes fully armed ...