Syrian military can share NATO technology with Russia

72
Acting in Syria, the Russian military receive not only combat experience, but also the opportunity to learn some Western technologies, Lev Romanov writes in an article for Messenger of Mordovia.

Syrian military can share NATO technology with Russia


For many years, the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact countries were the main arms suppliers to Syria. Western products came into the country in very limited quantities, the author notes. So France delivered the SA 342 Gazelle helicopters, "which, acting as anti-tank, showed themselves very well in 1982 in battles with the Israeli tanks».

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, when free aid came to naught and a solid currency was needed to acquire it, Syria began to look for cheaper options in countries that can hardly be called advanced in the field of armaments.

However, apart from this stories It looks like a deal with the Italian defense industry. “Specialists from the Apennines have contracted to upgrade the T-72. It should be noted that they proposed a fairly modern automated fire control system with the designation TURMS-T (Tank Universal Reconfiguration Modular System T-series - tank), ”the author writes.



The same OMS stands on the Italian main tanks C1 Ariete, as well as on “wheeled combat vehicles with heavy armament B1 Centauro, BMP VCC-80 DARDO and on modernized Czech tanks T-72CZ,” the newspaper notes.

According to him, “the monocular sight of the gunner-operator is stabilized in two planes, has a laser range finder, a second-generation thermal imager.” The sight is interfaced with a digital ballistic computer.



Information for shooting is displayed on the screen, which is placed in the eyepiece of the sight. The target detection range is up to 5 km in the afternoon and up to 4 km at night.



With the modernization of the machines was equipped with a panoramic sight of the tank commander. They also have stabilization in the 2-x planes and a thermal imager.

“Of course, these developments cannot be called the last word of science and technology, but they can cause a certain interest among our specialists. Let us recall how the upgraded Georgian T-72 SIM1 were run in Kubinka. And these Syrian tanks are much more perfect in terms of the internal filling, ”writes Romanov.



According to him, “now it would be useful to act as NATO members”, who are trying to get at their disposal any Russian military equipment, even if it has been in service for many years.

“Moreover, the modernized Syrian seventy-twenties will be able to become one of the most interesting exhibits of the exhibition of the Tank Museum in Kubinka later,” the author believes.
72 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +42
    7 October 2015 16: 42
    one cannot neglect the fruits of the human mind, even such a special one ...
  2. +20
    7 October 2015 16: 43
    They can’t, but they will share it if they have not already shared it.
    1. +1
      8 October 2015 08: 57
      Quote: sinukvl
      They can’t, but they will share it if they have not already shared it.

      They shared it without a doubt. It's just that they are doing it officially now.
      1. +1
        8 October 2015 17: 52
        Nevertheless, admit that it is not good that the Italian designs of the outdated generation are considered to be quite advanced in our country. But once the USSR was the leader and locomotive of world electronics ... Only long ago it was. When they built MESM. And after their developments they abandoned and began to copy outdated American cars - Khrushchev tried. We are still reaping the fruits - we do not have our own competitive processor: Elbrus is a military one and also uses the outdated VLIW architecture, and even the monstrous topology of 60 nm, and Baikal is a copy of British ARM. And in optics the situation is even worse: already during the time of Stalin, in this area we had a strategic lag, and it was such that the Germans loved to play shooting on their Panthers. In connection with the complete seam ... I read that even during the years of the Finnish campaign, the Germans even had an excellent radio station on training wedges ... And we only approached this in the war finale and only in the guard units. Yet the others continued to wave flags. And what’s the most annoying, these three whales of the modern army - electronics, optics and communications - are still in deep touch with us. So stuck in the fifties, while technology countries are torn in the twenty-second century and no one can stop them.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. The comment was deleted.
  3. 740
    +1
    7 October 2015 16: 46
    Reasonably. For what demon NATO technologies are needed. All the same, they never produced anything.
  4. +14
    7 October 2015 16: 47
    On the tank more than one DZ cube can not be seen, but the sight is "fancy". winked
  5. +5
    7 October 2015 16: 47
    Dismantle, assemble, shoot - and to the museum.
    1. +3
      7 October 2015 17: 41
      Quote: iliitch
      Dismantle, assemble, shoot - and to the museum.

      And to remove the drawings and give them to the developers - maybe that's interesting for future constructs and they are accumulating ...
  6. +19
    7 October 2015 16: 51
    It would be better if they brought Abrash to Cuba from Yemen!
    1. +5
      7 October 2015 17: 13
      They’ll drag him to another place.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. 0
        10 October 2015 08: 57
        so they burned down, what to drag there?
    2. +10
      7 October 2015 18: 14
      And why drag from Yemen, Lithuania is nearby, you can also compromise them laughing
      1. +2
        7 October 2015 19: 26
        Quote: afrikanez
        And why drag from Yemen, Lithuania is nearby, you can also compromise them

        what Well it is possible, but how to export it from there? it’s heavy, the trucks won’t pull, the tractor fawn belay
        1. +2
          7 October 2015 22: 27
          Quote: Corsair
          and how to export it from there? he is heavy, the trucks will not pull, the tractor fawn belay

          With its own move, Lithuania simply has nothing to stop. hi
      2. 0
        10 October 2015 08: 58
        the Lithuanians with the dough strained, so that they will sell! smile
  7. +14
    7 October 2015 16: 51
    the cruise ship launches were made by igilovites and not by anyone but the Caspian flotilla, if true, then well done Shoigu
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. gjv
      +12
      7 October 2015 17: 14
      Quote: dojjdik
      the cruise ship launches were made by igilovites and not by anyone but the Caspian flotilla, if true, then well done Shoigu

      Tonight, the naval strike group (KUG) of the Russian Navy, consisting of the Dagestan missile ship, the small missile ships Grad Sviyazhsk, Uglich, and Veliky Ustyug, struck infrastructure objects with cruise missiles of the Caliber complex from the Caspian Sea water area ISIS in Syria.
  8. +22
    7 October 2015 16: 51
    Abrash must be taken away from a dozen ISIS. Let our engines look, maybe there’s some interesting gadget there. The electronics of the tank will be inspected. We must somehow coordinate with our falcons, otherwise they wet everything that moves and does not move.
    1. +1
      7 October 2015 21: 21
      Engines from "Abrams" 35 years ago. And electronics and armor are still exported. especially in Iranian cars.
  9. +15
    7 October 2015 16: 54
    Once give it is necessary to take.
  10. +8
    7 October 2015 16: 58
    Let us recall how the modernized Georgian T-72 SIM1 circled in Kubinka. And these Syrian tanks - much more perfect in terms of internal filling "


    Well, if the Georgian were interesting, and the author writes that the Syrian is even more interesting, of course it is necessary to study. Another's experience is always interesting, especially with regard to night vision devices and thermal imagers. Yes
  11. -1
    7 October 2015 16: 58
    There will be an abrams, I have no doubt. I wanted to ask, you don’t feel offended by heavy fuel oil, you’re moroman when it comes to business, but what do you mean:) Knock yourself a couple of goals :)
  12. +4
    7 October 2015 17: 01
    Damn, I’d like to see the disassembled Obama!
    1. +2
      7 October 2015 17: 14
      Quote: Abbra
      Damn, I’d like to see the disassembled Obama!

      At the pathologist, as the time comes ...
    2. 0
      7 October 2015 17: 14
      Quote: Abbra
      Damn, I’d like to see the disassembled Obama!

      At the pathologist, as the time comes ...
    3. HAM
      +2
      7 October 2015 17: 40
      Obamsha said that nothing interesting, only the language is long .. if, of course, you are talking about Barak Abramovich.
    4. +2
      7 October 2015 18: 17
      Quote: Abbra
      Damn, I’d like to see the disassembled Obama!

      Will the circuit go? hi
      1. Fox
        +3
        7 October 2015 19: 30
        Quote: Bayonet
        Will the circuit go?

        wrong scheme ... no tail!
    5. +1
      7 October 2015 19: 42
      And why only on the barracks of Husseinovich? There is more than enough scum. Kerry, etc.
    6. 0
      8 October 2015 03: 25
      For defects? 100% is BARAK!
  13. +2
    7 October 2015 17: 04
    Well, well - these dividends are always quite by the way
  14. +8
    7 October 2015 17: 08
    Our military specialists need to study samples of Western equipment. War 08.08. It showed the backlog of the Russian military-industrial complex in encrypted communications systems, UAVs, battle control systems, tank control systems, etc. For 7 years, a great deal of work has been done in re-equipping the Russian troops with modern weapons, which is now being demonstrated in Syria.
  15. +1
    7 October 2015 17: 10
    Yes, they probably already shared it. And our specialists will find where to adapt.
  16. +37
    7 October 2015 17: 11
    The genesis of the relationship of individual comrades to the participation of the Russian Federation in the fighting in Syria:
    1. Putin will not be solved.
    2. Well no.
    3. No.
    4. Yes, where? ..
    5. Where is he going? !!
    6. Everything. Now everything is exactly.
    7. They began to bomb. Do they have something to bomb? Oh, do not make me laugh.
    8. Oh, do not tell "did not hit the civilians." How - we know ...
    9. They did not get into civilians? Damn, did they get into ISIS? Are they completely crazy? In the LIH same - living people!
    10. Ahhhh! They bombed a kindergarten LIH !!! ..
    11. Well, it was not a kindergarten and not LIH. It was a hospital in Afghan Kunduz and it was bombed by the Yankees. But after all - from the best intentions. Not like this Putin ...
    12. Soon they will be exhausted. See - see how nervously the wing guy pulls in Su-25? All this cramps! Ah, was he only aiming for the dumping of the mine? ..
    13. We all consulted here and decided that it was time to put an end to this. Therefore, as a sign of contempt, we stop writing, thinking and talking about it. Let's leave for communication only middle fingers, hehe. And overthrow the bloody.
    14. Today, not one, but two Russians in Syria got into the shot. This indicates the undoubted accumulation of forces for the deliberately failed land offensive. And how the land offensives end for the Russians - we know, yeah! .. Who said "the capture of Berlin"? Where is this traitor ?!
    15. Strange, but four days have passed, and Putin did not start a ground attack. Must-be - completely exhausted, poor thing. And exhausted. All tyranny is doomed.
    16. They began to launch missiles from ships at ISIS. Rockets! They, it turns out, have rockets! The latter, of course. It’s just that all Putin’s planes have already been beaten up, so we have to blow the remnants of military weakness ... Ha-ha-ha, we will answer this. Right in the face of the TV. Mode - FSE. So write it down.
    17. They are launching rockets again.
    18. And throw bombs.
    19. And do not let ground troops into battle. Otherwise, they would have long been bogged down and lined everything! ..
    20. Stacks of their dead! Shta-be-la-mi!
    21. Ahhh ... They are just scared. Yes. Therefore - this is all. But we know! ..
    22. Bombs again, rockets again.
    23. Once upon a time it should end! Where does Soros just look? ..
    24. They hit again. Not in that sense, but in ISIS.
    25. Yes ё! ..
    26. Come on!..
    27. Yes Yeperny theater! ..
    28. And figs with them ... You worry about them, you worry - and no gratitude !!!
    https://twitter.com/tvrain/status/651724656429395968

    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. win
      +2
      7 October 2015 18: 18
      How cute - lamb ...
  17. +1
    7 October 2015 17: 41
    That is the P-e-n-d-o-s-siya so jumps ... already and Igilovtsev recorded herself as a friend ...))
  18. +1
    7 October 2015 17: 46
    Quote: dojjdik
    the cruise ship launches were made by igilovites and not by anyone but the Caspian flotilla, if true, then well done Shoigu

    Missiles flew from the Caspian Sea not only over the territory of Russia and Syria. Apparently, the launches were agreed with other countries where there is air defense.
  19. +1
    7 October 2015 17: 46
    Syrian military can share NATO technology with Russia

    Big minus article. negative In Syria, there was no trace of NATO technology. Syria has never produced anything NATO. The author would have to learn what the term "technology" means.
    1. +10
      7 October 2015 17: 55
      all technologies in Israel, miserable goyim, in principle, can not do anything)))))))))
      1. +3
        7 October 2015 19: 53
        Yes, yes :) But seriously, they are brainy in Israel, of course, but not so much that they feel dry and comfortable if they make Russia angry. Palestinians with slingshots are one thing; Palestinians with enough modern weapons are quite another. And if they think that their numerous intelligence services completely exclude such a possibility, then they still have a big surprise! :)
    2. +11
      7 October 2015 18: 05
      Do not forget that ISIS is fighting in Syria not so long ago emptied the stocks of Iraq's arsenals, generously filled with the United States. Among other things, there are Abrams tanks, Hamvee army all-terrain vehicles, MK-19 grenade launchers and other American weapons.
      1. +7
        7 October 2015 18: 10
        Quote: raid14
        Abrams tanks, Hamvee army all-terrain vehicles, MK-19 grenade launchers and other American weapons

        These are finished samples. technicians. Not technology.

        Quote: professor
        Syria has never produced anything NATO. The author would learn what the term "technology" means

        The professor is right in this case. You and anti-Semite - no.

        At the same time, it is clear that the technique can (and should) be gutted into elements in search of new knowledge. On the basis of which (new knowledge) - you can already think about some new technologies.

        But in any case - this is a long process, and not "the Syrians have shared" Yes
        1. +3
          7 October 2015 18: 23
          Quote: professor
          The author would have to learn what the term "technology" means.

          Quote: Cat Man Null
          These are ready-made samples of equipment. Not technology.


          absolutely fair.
          Comrade Lev Romanov for the Messenger of Mordovia, sorry, he wrote nonsense.
          1. 0
            7 October 2015 19: 48
            I wrote it the other day regarding the credibility of the publication you mentioned and the people who wrote there, so they got it. Although all this shnyaga is absolutely violet to me.
        2. +8
          7 October 2015 18: 24
          After all, it is clear what was being said about the technology, the study of which will open the curtain over technology. You as bank lawyers - just to get some letters.
          1. 0
            7 October 2015 18: 30
            Quote: Eugene-Eugene
            After all, it’s clear what was discussed - about technology, the study of which will open the curtain on technology

            No, it's not clear. Here "Western technologies" are written in black to the Russians and repeatedly.
            Learning technology will not open the curtain on technology. Learn damask blades. Do you now have Damascus technology? wink
            1. +2
              7 October 2015 19: 57
              That you tell the Chinese. They will laugh.
              1. +2
                7 October 2015 23: 00
                Quote: Mikhail Krapivin
                That you tell the Chinese. They will laugh.

                They do "laugh" at the technology of manufacturing engines for their analogue, Our Su-27, but they don't buy engines in Russia, just like the Americans do over Our RD, although both have product samples ... wink Possession of a sample is not the possession of technology. And there are millions of such examples.
            2. 0
              7 October 2015 22: 50
              Something like that, Colleague
              http://kovnosh.ucoz.ru/publ/kovka_shlifovka/damask_i_bulat/2-1-0-30
            3. 0
              7 October 2015 22: 53
              The world is made in His likeness.
          2. +1
            7 October 2015 18: 33
            Quote: Eugene-Eugene
            it was a question of technology, the study of which will open the curtain on technology

            Maybe it will open slightly .. or maybe it will not .. agree, this is not at all what

            ... share NATO technologies with Russia

            No.
            1. 0
              8 October 2015 00: 44
              Quote: Cat Man Null
              Quote: Eugene-Eugene
              it was a question of technology, the study of which will open the curtain on technology

              Maybe it will open slightly .. or maybe it will not .. agree, this is not at all what

              ... share NATO technologies with Russia

              No.

              what ??? "to share NATO technology with Russia" implies a completely different meaning, everything is written correctly, and the professor is not Russian for a long time
              1. 0
                8 October 2015 00: 46
                Quote: poquello
                her ???

                Mancho ..

                Quote: poquello
                "to share NATO equipment with Russia" implies a completely different meaning

                What kind of one?

                Quote: poquello
                everything is written correctly

                Where? What is right?

                Quote: poquello
                professor is no longer Russian

                And I - a long time Russian .. so what?
                1. 0
                  8 October 2015 01: 19
                  Quote: Cat Man Null

                  Quote: poquello
                  everything is written correctly

                  Where? What is right?

                  Acting in Syria, the Russian military receive not only combat experience, but also the opportunity to learn some Western technologies, ...

                  that's bad luck, the author forgot especially for you to write that the LMS is a technique
                  1. +1
                    8 October 2015 01: 26
                    Quote: poquello
                    MSA is technique

                    Soooo .. right ..

                    Only - and where does this?

                    Russian military receive not only combat experience, but also opportunity to learn some western technologieswrites Lev Romanov

                    The difference between "technique" and "technology" is detailed above.

                    Indeed, all wink
                    1. 0
                      8 October 2015 01: 38
                      Quote: Cat Man Null
                      Only - and where does this?

                      Russian military receive not only combat experience, but also opportunity to learn some western technologieswrites Lev Romanov

                      The difference between "technique" and "technology" is detailed above.

                      opportunity to study some western technology

                      according to the received samples. It’s not Syria that will teach technology, we’ll figure it out for ourselves, Damascus ё-mine
                      1. 0
                        8 October 2015 10: 06
                        Quote: poquello
                        the opportunity to study some Western technologies from the samples received

                        Duc .. it’s been told to you twenty times before .. what is breaking through the open door?

                        Quote: poquello
                        It’s not Syria that will teach technology, we’ll figure it out for ourselves

                        Right And this is also twenty times before you have already been told.

                        This is to read first what people say. Then comprehend. And only then, if you have something to say, sculpt comments.

                        In order not to look .. silly Yes
                      2. 0
                        8 October 2015 22: 06
                        Quote: Cat Man Null

                        Right And this is also twenty times before you have already been told.

                        but it seems a little to you, everything is written in the article, and where is the professor right?
                      3. +1
                        8 October 2015 22: 11
                        Quote: poquello
                        everything is written in the article, and where is the professor right?

                        (thoughtfully): I'll start swearing obscenities ..

                        - article title: "The Syrians Share Technology"
                        - Professor: not with technology, but with models of technology
                        - me: the professor is right

                        What - more - is it incomprehensible to you ?? fool
                      4. +1
                        8 October 2015 22: 48
                        Quote: Cat Man Null
                        Quote: poquello
                        everything is written in the article, and where is the professor right?

                        (thoughtfully): I'll start swearing obscenities ..

                        - article title: "The Syrians Share Technology"
                        - Professor: not with technology, but with models of technology
                        - me: the professor is right

                        - I: Syrians will share technology - it looks much dumber in the title of this article.
                        What - more - is it incomprehensible to you ?? fool
                      5. -1
                        8 October 2015 22: 58
                        Quote: poquello
                        Syrians share technology - looks much dumber in the title of this article

                        Samples of technology wink

                        Okay .. in the third round we went, IMHO.

                        I'm not interested anymore. You are right, you are right in everything. Just don’t worry so much hi
          3. +3
            7 October 2015 18: 40
            Quote: Eugene-Eugene
            You are like banking lawyers - just to get to the bottom of a letter.

            laughing funny comparison
            Quote: Eugene-Eugene
            about technology, the study of which will open the curtain on technology.

            There is a legend that, delighted with the T-72, Assad's dad of the USSR presented the captured Magach-5 as a token of gratitude. And our DZ blazers were very interested) It was just that in those days it was not thoughtfully called "shares Israeli technologies" laughing
            1. -1
              7 October 2015 18: 56
              Quote: Das Boot
              And our DZ blazers were very interested) It was just that in those days it was not thoughtfully called "shares Israeli technologies"

              No. Maximum received a sample and copied the design. to get the technology you need to walk around the factory to the manufacturer, sketch HOW they make the product, at what temperature, on what equipment, etc.

              Quote: raid14
              That is, you claim that in this technique there are no advanced military technologies?

              I doubt that there is something advanced there, but even if there are Syrians, they can’t share the technology because they don’t have it.
              1. +1
                7 October 2015 21: 17
                Quote: professor
                No. Maximum received a sample and copied the design. to get the technology you need to walk around the factory to the manufacturer, sketch HOW they make the product, at what temperature, on what equipment, etc.

                Prof, but did I say the opposite ?? Well, this is all obvious. laughing
        3. +1
          7 October 2015 18: 38
          That is, you say that this technique does not have advanced military technologies? Composite tank armor, tank sights, and a fire control system are not of interest to Russian defense industry specialists. Is it impossible to benefit from the presented weapons that are of interest to designers and engineers? The article is titled "The Syrian military can share NATO technology with Russia" hence all the derivatives.
          1. +2
            7 October 2015 18: 50
            Quote: raid14
            That is, you affirm

            Nah .. it's you .. you say something incomprehensible negative

            TECHNOLOGY (Feminine)

            The set of processes for processing or processing materials in a particular industry, as well as a scientific description of the methods of production

            That is,

            Quote: raid14
            share NATO technologies with Russia

            - means to convey at least a "scientific description of the methods of production".

            Question: where does the Syrian military come from?

            They can share the technique. The technique can be "interesting". And they cannot with technology. Since they don't have them request
            1. +1
              7 October 2015 18: 59
              Quote: Cat Man Null
              They can share the technique. The technique can be "interesting". And they cannot with technology. Since they don't have them

              Something is tormenting me with vague doubts that this LMS of the end of the last century, which was installed, among other things, on T-72 "Czechs", is not a secret for our Research Institute "Interesting Things". Although in Kubinka, museum workers 72 with turms-t can cause a certain itch laughing
      2. 0
        7 October 2015 19: 56
        And the plane doesn’t care what to burn - the Abrams tank or the Humvi army all-terrain vehicle. And the MK-19 grenade launcher against the aircraft is not an assistant.
    3. -2
      7 October 2015 19: 57
      this is a huge minus for you, "professor" of military technology. There are heaps of American products in the Middle East, we will pick everything up.
      1. +1
        7 October 2015 22: 53
        Quote: gunter_laux
        this is a huge minus for you, "professor" of military technology. There are heaps of American products in the Middle East, we will pick everything up.

        The professor is entitled to all 100 .. What technologies the Syrians can have. If you reprint the article, so carefully. The Western articles are not about technologies, but about SAMPLES! Feel the difference. A sample is far from technology.
  20. +3
    7 October 2015 17: 54
    To dismember, dissect, study and learn everything with the benefit of the Motherland.
  21. +1
    7 October 2015 17: 58
    Hey! Military! And why the barrel of the gun is not cleaned. Not order in the tank troops.
  22. 0
    7 October 2015 18: 13
    What do you mean "can", just have to. Not a topic for discussion and speculation .. Or, again, those "brothers" who simply "drink blood", always looking for benefits. Examples of darkness, especially now.
  23. 0
    7 October 2015 18: 17
    Tell me, if when a barrel gets into a tank, it’s buried directly above the driver’s hatch? Let’s say the T-64
    1. +2
      7 October 2015 18: 24
      Quote: kervin78
      when hit in the tank, the barrel is directly above the hatch

      1. The mechanic on the T-64 has the ability to "emergency" turn the turret.

      There are two questions in this case: is the stabilizer turned on, and is the MV able to do anything at all after getting into the tank

      2. The mechanic on the T-64 has the opportunity to go to the fighting compartment. Only this .. laborious request
      1. +1
        7 October 2015 22: 55
        Quote: Cat Man Null
        Quote: kervin78
        when hit in the tank, the barrel is directly above the hatch

        1. The mechanic on the T-64 has the ability to "emergency" turn the turret.

        There are two questions in this case: is the stabilizer turned on, and is the MV able to do anything at all after getting into the tank

        2. The mechanic on the T-64 has the opportunity to go to the fighting compartment. Only this .. laborious request

        3. The tank also has a hatch on the bottom of the tank just next to the driver.
        1. 0
          7 October 2015 23: 01
          Quote: Алексей_К
          The tank also has a hatch on the bottom of the tank just next to the driver

          In the T-64 - behind the driver’s seat, to be precise.

          Only this is even more labor-intensive than removing a pair of trays from the MOH (option 2 above).
  24. +5
    7 October 2015 18: 19
    Nobody canceled work with trophies.
    The Syrians really cannot please us with something, everything is out of date. But the Americans, supplying their weapons to moderate thugs, can. I think the special forces are already working out certain areas
    1. 0
      7 October 2015 20: 07
      So, I think that even radio portraits of the "Predator" and, for example, the F-22 at different angles of attack will be useful to us. Fragments and unexploded ordnance, especially high-precision ones, then, most likely, the latest versions of the Stingers will go (do not approach us with the earlier versions). Everything will come in handy, we take wholesale !!!
  25. 0
    7 October 2015 19: 38
    Quote: afrikanez
    And why drag from Yemen, Lithuania is nearby, you can also compromise them laughing


    They want to eat, they themselves will drive.
  26. +1
    7 October 2015 19: 59
    “Now it would be useful to act as NATO members,” who are trying to get at their disposal any Russian model of military equipment, even if it has been in service for many years.
    That's why - a good thought always comes after? In the late 19th - early 20th centuries, the Japanese bought tons of documentation on projects rejected by the military department from us. What ended in 1904 everyone knows? Only one Japanese shooting distance at Tsushima is worth something. With the union, this approach justified itself, but there were excesses in copying which was not necessary (paint that reduces radiation, supposedly at times, in fact, no more than 5 percent). I think that enough time has passed since the times of the USSR, and most importantly, such a concept as "industrial espionage" has taken root in our country. And this is not "now it would be useful", but most likely it did not end or we would have already been eaten "for lunch ... with a French bun ... with whiskey."
  27. +1
    7 October 2015 20: 02
    Quote: rus-5819
    Quote: afrikanez
    And why drag from Yemen, Lithuania is nearby, you can also compromise them laughing


    They want to eat, they themselves will drive.

    Is logical. Suppose we buy some sprats from them, and Abrams comes with sprats. All together on the ship and sail.
  28. 0
    7 October 2015 21: 45
    Quote: HAM
    Obamsha said that nothing interesting, only the language is long .. if, of course, you are talking about Barak Abramovich.

    Perhaps she spoke with undisguised pride?
  29. 0
    8 October 2015 05: 14
    useful interaction however ...