"Provide 10 percent, and the capital agrees to any use, with 20 percent it becomes lively, with 50 percent it is positively ready to break its head, with 100 percent it violates all human laws, with 300 percent there is no crime for which he would not risk , at least on pain of the gallows. "
Recently it has become fashionable to show your anti-communism. Even the Council of Europe equalized communism and Nazism in its resolution. And a number of statesmen and politicians mockingly approved this action. In particular, those who began to glorify Nazism and its minions on a national scale. And the Council of Europe favorably regards the restoration of the fascist ideology in Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia. Not a word against the restoration of Bandera in Ukraine. The Council calmly looks at the persecution of those people who fought against fascism. Our deputies and the government of United Russia in response mumbled a few standard frazochek and returned to their personal affairs, more close to them.
Not being a supporter of any ideology, I want to express my opinion, of course, subjective, like every person. And let the readers judge the result.
I consider it necessary to start with the establishment of Soviet power in October 1917. Modern historians prefer to call this event a coup (and at the same time a revolution - a similar event 1793 of the year in France). This alone indicates the lack of impartiality of these scientists. I can understand the personal approach, but not in science. Reflecting on this topic, I came to the conclusion that such a difference is explained very simply: the Great French Revolution only overthrew the monarchy, and the October Revolution abolished private property. This is what infuriates the current capitalists and their servants.
Private property! Nothing can be sweeter than her, for she gives wealth, power, power. Moreover, for some reason, the fact that the “tsar-father” was overthrown not by the bloody Bolsheviks, but by completely different forces, was forgotten and held back. And it was not the Bolsheviks who went to the tsar's headquarters for his abdication, but the same Cadets, Octobrists and others, that is, representatives of big business. However, the usurpers of power and the persecutors of the "beloved" monarchs for some reason were not Kerensky, Milyukov, Putilov and others ... But let us return to the sources.
It has become fashionable to accuse the Bolsheviks of red terror, of the horrors of civil war, devastation and collapse. It is useful to recall that the civil war and the intervention of more than a dozen states was not unleashed by the Bolsheviks. Who knows, do not happen such an intervention, as if the move went storieswould then be terror or not! Terror does not honor any political regime, and Soviet Russia is no exception here. But why, then, did the white terror get forgotten? Why did they forget about the atrocities of the Entente countries in Russia? Or was their terror much more humane? Maybe they hung, shot and burned in some other, human way? So I see a sugary stuffer on the content of United Russia, choking with delight, who almost sincerely thinks the White Guards are soaked with humanism to such an extent that they were taken prisoner by the Red Army men with tea and jam, dressed and shoes, took them to the bathhouse, and then made tea with jam. their harmonica with balalaikas to fill their leisure time ... Why did the latter-day statesmen and their hangers-out forget that the interventionist countries did not disdain to take out valuables, resources, artistic works? Or maybe their actions should be considered a legitimate method of warfare against communism? However, even now the values of our country are being squandered.
These questions are very inconvenient, and rarely anyone can answer them impartially. It is much safer and more profitable to blame all the mortal sins of those who can no longer answer. And they pay very well for it. It is enough to cite as an example the well-known Viktor Suvorov, who cynically appropriated the name of the great Russian patriot and commander as a pseudonym and boasts that he became a traitor.
But back to the topic of the article. Terror was and there’s no way to get away from it, it’s a generally recognized fact, only one of its sides is hushed up. I will not say how justified he was in those conditions, you cannot rewrite history, and I will not say that the white terror was fairer only because they executed fewer people than the red ones. Although the issue of numbers is very controversial, because now it is impossible to accurately calculate how many people died at the hands of whites and at the hands of red ones. I will not whitewash and justify neither those nor those. We can not weigh human lives on the scales, the "humanity" of terror is not measured by a smaller number of ruined lives. But modern "democrats" are not at all worried. Money, given by large capital, it is necessary to work out. So the lush stream of distorted facts from the mocking Svanidze and others lashes, and rare impartial studies like Larisa Vasilyeva’s works drown in the stream.
The war died down, and the young Soviet republic accomplished what no other country in the world could repeat - in a few years the ruined and devastated country made a giant leap in its economic development. The value of this is not even denied in the West, but skillfully silenced or distorted in modern Russia. From a country that was almost completely destroyed, a great industrial power arose from chaos and ashes. This was not in any country in the world. And as it were, the modern rulers, beginning with Yeltsin and his gang, did not manage to create even the weak resemblance of this phenomenon, except for large-scale robbery of the people in the early 90s of the last century. Rather the opposite. It was these newly-minted "democrats," the henchmen of big capital, who inflicted the most shameful defeat on a country that, perhaps, since the times of Genghis Khan and Batu, has not experienced such enormous human and territorial losses. Even during the Great Patriotic War, the Nazis did not manage to inflict such significant damage on the country's economy and achieve such a reduction in human potential. After the coup in Belovezhskaya Pushcha in December 1991, the country rapidly rolled down. The rise of inflation, rising prices, rampant crime and a decline in morals began. And the mastermind of all this is buried in the prestigious cemetery of the country with the granting of various honors. In his honor, the university was renamed, despite the fact that, according to the referendum, the majority of students were opposed, and they were renamed only because the current rector was his “friend”, and he wanted to do something pleasant in memory of one of the most disgraceful politicians . They also rename the street, and not just any Driveway or Construction Road, but the street 1905 of the year, thereby erasing historical memory. But it was Yeltsin who carried out the plans of Allen Dulles to destroy the integrity of our country, the moral and moral essence of the peoples.
However, our democrats don’t care about it, everything is like water off a duck's back. "It is not important how it was," they say, "it is important how they will be remembered."
So they create an image of true guardians about the people that are loved and similar to themselves. They have no reason to remember that in the twenties of the same century, the Soviet state essentially carried out not only a political revolution, but also an economic and cultural one. And that in the most difficult years, the population of the country did not decline, but grew. Yes, philosophers and historians, writers and artists were expelled, but such phenomena existed before the October Revolution in many countries. And I repeat again: I am not talking about the comparability of phenomena, I am talking about the events themselves, regardless of the scale. Was such a gigantic transformation of the society under the Romanovs possible? Hardly. Of course, the industrial take-off of Russia at the beginning of the century was huge, but it rested on a solid foundation of the previous development. And Soviet Russia began practically from scratch. And not big capital liquidated the estates, not financial aces eliminated landlord ownership of land. In the same way, it is possible to talk about the elimination of almost completely illiteracy of the population. The Romanovs, whose fate is so annoyingly mourned by almost all current politicians, capitalists, bankers, economists, have done practically nothing in this area. And it was the Soviet government that gave knowledge, a letter and even its own alphabets to many peoples of Russia, and not a kind tsar-father. Or maybe I'm wrong? And, referring to the Romanovs, whose fate is so close to the heart of the modern regime, should I say a few words? Yes, they were shot, children were shot, but why were they ranked as saints? Why does the church love so much to kiss their remains and earnestly glorify? I am not an adversary of the church, on the contrary, I am a believer, but I am sickened by servility to no longer outstanding representatives of the royal dynasty. Which, by the way, are directly and indirectly to blame for the 9 massacres of January 1905 of the year, the punitive campaigns of 1905-1906, the Lensky shooting of the 1912 of the year and many other acts. For some reason, these things do not appear in the words of church leaders and government officials. Or are they simply considered trials that fell on the unfortunate Romanovs? In the history of each state was a lot of blood and crime. However, no one except us sprinkles ashes on his head and yells to the whole world about what a villain he is, a bastard and an idiot! Why should we be ashamed of our homeland and repent forever? Perhaps, in order to instil in all the rest, and the youth growing up in the country, the idea of the inferiority of our people? And the ROC is zealous in this disgrace with its appeals: "Repent that you have killed the king, otherwise Russia will continue to live in nothingness - because she is punished for raising a hand against the anointed of God!" And this instead of instilling in the hearts of parishioners love for the Motherland, pride in their ancestors, their wisdom, courage and achievements! Why did Peter III or Paul I not receive this honor? By the way, Paul I did something for Russia, despite all his absurdities. But Grishka Rasputin completely disappeared from all that is associated with the names of autocrats. Who lived all their lives in bliss, warmth, satiety, they were declared saints, but those who were killed on Palace Square, who were trampled to death on the Khodynka field, are not even honored by mere mention in prayers. It is also useful to recall that under tsarism there was also such a shameful phenomenon as serfdom, when the nobles and the church did not disdain to have slaves at their disposal. And the same church is concerned only with the restoration of the monarchy, but the immediate problems remain behind. And although, on the whole, during the Great Patriotic War, the Orthodox Church stood in a patriotic position, yet some high-ranking representatives of the Russian Church Abroad and the Moscow Patriarchate supported Hitler. This is explained by the fact that the leaders of the Orthodox Churches saw in the attack of Germany and its allies on the USSR an opportunity to restore church life in the occupied territories, almost destroyed or driven underground by the Soviet anti-religious policy, and in the future to restore the tsarist regime that supported Orthodoxy financially and politically. At the same time, the good goals of the faith were replaced by the betrayal of the NATIONAL interests of Russia. And the honor and glory of those church leaders who did not go on about, and advocated a holy war against fascism.
Continuing the theme of the church, I want to point out that it is not quite clear to me why during divine services the best places are given to newly-minted merchants, unscrupulous politicians and others, although everyone is equal before God. Or are church leaders concerned only with their income, the restoration of the monarchy, the construction of churches and monasteries, and all the other problems? But this also applies to the current authorities, who don’t care about rampant criminality, drug addiction, corruption, prostitution ... But why don’t they care? Rather, even indulgence, since it was precisely in the CURRENT regime that banditry flourished in full bloom, bribery was widespread, prostitution became the norm, and Chechen terrorists receive indulgences. Pensioners were deprived of the right to free travel in transport, the pensions promised by 10000 remained words, utility tariffs are growing by leaps and bounds ... In general, the complete transformation of society into a capitalist formation according to plans of Dulles, Hitler, Yeltsin, Bush. Virtually no major official or activist of United Russia has received a real term of imprisonment for his crimes. Khodorkovsky is being blown away for all of them. Why is all the same blessed property, the instincts of predation, the desire for profit? Why is not one of the oligarchs sent a call to give all the property and money to the poor? But Jesus Christ spoke about this. What do the current statesmen and church hierarchs dream about when they offer prayers for the restoration of the monarchy? About the welfare of the people? Hardly. About their privileges and wealth? Very, very likely.
What can I say, if the burial of criminal authority becomes the center of media attention. And thanks to our authorities, young people know very well who Lena Berkova and Sergey Zverev are, but they cannot remember who Maya Plisetskaya and Sergey Obraztsov are.
Moral and spiritual values are now advertised through a poshlyatinka in the form of "Comedy Club" and "Comedy woman", pornography flows like water from TV screens, the Internet and the media are full of colorful descriptions of murders and robberies that have become the norm. In the course and fashion "Albany" language ... It is necessary to open the Internet, and you can buy any prostitute at a "reasonable price." But kinoklassiki show masterpieces more often at night. And how they have not yet given the channels "Culture" and "Union" to the newly-minted rich Buratino! .. But they can, because United Russia is primarily concerned with its well-being. They plant a small fry for a stolen pie - right there and glorify and justify, allegedly, for the lack of evidence of true robbers and criminals.
In order not to be unfounded, I will give several examples of this attitude and double standards. In Blagoveshchensk, the city court put an end to the case of two former officials, who “facilitated” the budget of the Amur region for 794,6 thousand rubles. For the money they flew to Kamchatka to relax. All accused are given suspended sentences. Or in Yekaterinburg, deputies decided to create an entire palace for sittings. Apparently, things in the Sverdlovsk region are so good in all areas that the money remains to be spent only on this. And why utilities and education complain about bad conditions? They are slandering, apparently ... And I’ll also cite one excerpt from the Internet: "The court recognized that the daughter of the head of the Irkutsk election commission, who shot down two pedestrians on the sidewalk, is a witness to the accident, but not his culprit, reports BABR.RU. The culprit of the incident, as a result of which one woman died, and the second was left disabled, the court has not yet established. According to the newspaper, Anna Shavenkova’s attack on the girls in the center of Irkutsk was recorded by an external surveillance camera of the Baikal State University of Economics and Law, near which the accident occurred. However, the court did not take this into account, deciding that Shavenkova is a witness to the accident. However, according to the newspaper, the driver was not checked for alcohol in the blood.However, the procedure went through the injured. 2 occurred on December 2009 of the year.Shavenkova flew at high speed Two women were killed on the sidewalk: 34-year-old Elena and 27-year-old Yulia Pyatkovoy. Elena died as a result of the accident, and Yulia was seriously injured. Soon after the incident, a video about the accident spread on the Internet. The video shows how Shavenkova, taking off for a bus stop, got out of the car. Not paying attention to the victims, she began to inspect the damage to her car. ”
So tell me, the defenders of United Russia and the current regime: what is happening in our homeland?
Moral at the highest standards of modern society. Full triumph of freedom and democracy. However, this is precisely the secret desire of power. People with the psychology of small shopkeepers are much easier to manage than educated and thinking people. With all its sins during the Soviet era, there was no such cynicism, no sweeping immorality.
At the end of the 20-s, Stalin began a mass repression, the peak of which fell on the 1937 year. This fact is very fond of playing, talking about concentration camps, torture and so on. They cite figures of tens of millions of people shot (for the most part, this is suggested by the West), artificially whitewash everyone, regardless of the fact that there were real criminals. I will not refute any of this, because there is a lot of literature on this issue, let me just say that the British invented the concentration camps at the end of the 19 century, and torture, including mass tortures, was used very widely in the history of any state. Suffice it to recall the gladiators and slaves of ancient Rome, the despotism of Assyria and Babylon, the Spanish Inquisition, the oprichnina of Ivan the Terrible, the executioners of Peter the Great, the extermination of the peoples by the Turks during the Ottoman Empire. If you look at the solid historical works, it will not be difficult to find a lot of examples of terror against both your own and foreign peoples of almost every state. However, something I do not hear the moans about their atrocities. Or are there atrocities happening on a different, more humane basis? Why do not the French curse their king, who organized the St. Bartholomew's night? Why do not krivozashchitniki throw angry words to the British, who killed many people in honor of the empire and the robbery of half the world? Where did the righteous anger about the total extermination of Indians in America? Explain it to me, gentlemen "democrats" and others like them ...
At the beginning of the article I mentioned the notorious PACE resolution on the identity of communism and national socialism. But at the same time, the authors and those who happily voted for it, forgot that it was their states who fostered fascism, provided him with money and pushed him to take over. The Anschluss of Austria did not meet with any opposition from the leading countries of the "democratic" West. Poland has forgotten that as a result of the Munich Agreement, she received a piece of Czechoslovak territory, no one objected to the aggression of imperial Japan in China. All means were good, just to push Hitler to the east. And this is only the smallest thing that can be said about the role of the West in unleashing aggression and the Second World War. It is worth mentioning that after the end of the war thousands of SS and Nazis not only received asylum in the United States, but also were involved in work as specialists in the fight against communism. The Catholic and Protestant churches in Germany used forced labor of prisoners of war during the war. According to the testimony of a former US Army intelligence officer, William Gowan, in a federal court in San Francisco, Vatican officials sheltered Nazi war criminals and collaborators from arrest and trial. They also helped harbor and legalize property taken from the victims of the Nazis, including Jews. Thus, assistance was rendered to Klaus Barbie (“the Lyon butcher”), Adolf Eichmann, Dr. Mengele and Franz Stengel, the head of the death camp Treblinka. And these are only individual names, they can be called hundreds and thousands ... And the same Americans not only do not condemn the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, they are proud of it, as they are proud of the extermination of the Vietnamese people. How are their actions different from the actions of the communists? What other qualitative assumption underlies their actions? What do you say, gentlemen democrats and accusers? Why do former SS men feel at ease in the Baltic States today, why monuments are erected to them, verses are composed in their honor, and you are modestly silent, only occasionally squeeze out some attempts of indignation, which in the West do not care for everyone? Georgian follow-ups blow up a memorial to Soviet soldiers ... Here they are, the consequences of Yeltsinism and rotten capitalism. But do the powers that care care? So, a couple of words, that's all. Could this happen during the Soviet era?
And the last thing I want to say. Say about the people who govern us. Can they be called true patriots? People who from the heart kissed Leonid Ilyich, glorified him wherever possible, people who swore allegiance to the CPSU and commitment to communism, and in 1991, they burned together their party cards and became anti-communists at once? Who are they imposing the capitalist worldview, the servants of big capital? Try to answer, readers, can you be considered honest people of all these Chubais, Gaidar, Rossel, and others like them? Can we be considered the guardians of national welfare, when at the end of the year they brag not about their own affairs, but compete in the number of millions earned by them? And if so, when and where did they fight for our interests and dignity with you, without sparing either your life or your wallet? It is not a sin to remember those who, entering the post of the next trough, are instantly recorded in the ranks of the "United Russia". I do not believe that by the dictates of the soul, their only motive is the dictates of their own pockets, for by joining not only the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, but at least Fair Russia, these bureaucrats will instantly fly out of their familiar spots like cork from a bottle of champagne.
And one more example for defenders of the current regime. Most recently, the general director of the Kalina concern stated that he was very pleased with the fact that the trade unions had been liquidated at his enterprise. What a wonderful analogy with Henry Ford, who acted and acted similarly, with the only difference that in his office hung a portrait of the great Fuhrer of the German nation. However, I would not be surprised if the current oligarchs keep similar Parsons, if not on the walls, then in the drawers of their tables.
That, in general, is all I wanted to say. Foldable turned out or not, to judge you. I agree that the article has a lot of flaws, a small volume, and, perhaps, does not contain interesting facts. I will be glad to receive any feedback, suggestions, criticism. At the same time, please remember that, like any person, I am not devoid of bias, and do not judge too harshly.