US Air Force Commander Announces First “Visual Contact” between US and Russian Pilots

105
US Air Force commander Charles Brown in an interview CBS He said that for the first time since the start of the operation of the Russian Aerospace Forces in Syria, “visual contact between American and Russian pilots” took place. According to Brown, Russian airplanes approached 20 miles from US airplanes, and this “allowed American pilots to see Russian airplanes on their radars.” This is what a “visual contact” looks like, according to the version of the general.

US Air Force Commander Announces First “Visual Contact” between US and Russian Pilots


Charles Brown:
Our aviation makes much more sorties than Russians. If we have to go around Russian planes in Syrian airspace, then within a short period of time.


At the same time, for some reason, the commander of the US Air Force did not explain how it turns out that American aircraft and Drones are in the skies of Syria much more than Russian ones in time, and of the recent successes of the US Air Force - only two defeated excavators ...

Meanwhile, the head of the Pentagon, Ashton Carter, spoke in favor of beginning early negotiations (second round) between representatives of the Russian Defense Ministry and the US military. According to Carter, successful negotiations will reduce the risks for US and Russian aircraft during the operation of the US Air Force and the Russian Aerospace Force in the skies of Syria.

Recall that just a few hours ago, in the same Pentagon, they stated that they did not intend to hold any consultations with Russia as long as Russia "supported Assad." At the same time, Washington accused the Russian Space Forces of the Russian Federation that ISIS terrorists are allegedly not targets of air strikes.

Now they started talking about consultations again after seeing Russian airplanes on radars. Washington's opinion changes several times in one day.
  • www.af.mil
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

105 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +46
    6 October 2015 17: 06
    Hmm, however. The most visual such contact.
    1. +11
      6 October 2015 17: 09
      Well, the muzzle :)))
      When they saw Russian planes, the bricks were put aside ???
      Everything happens in the sky and nefig inflate scandals! Your time is gone !!!

      Statement by our Foreign Ministry:
      [media = https: //russian.rt.com/article/121646]
      1. +12
        6 October 2015 17: 15
        According to Brown, Russian planes approached US Air Force planes about 20 miles, and this "allowed American pilots to see Russian planes on their radar." This is what "visual contact" looks like, according to the general

        Only now they talked MIiG - 29. now suddenly SU - 30 ?! thought up nonsense again ?!
        Well then, let's give a video on YouTube, we won’t believe otherwise, you have accustomed us!
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. +6
              6 October 2015 20: 22
              Well, again we approached them. Now we are approaching NATO, then their saloons in the Syrian sky. Move away, nafig, in your omeriku and no one will "approach" you, well, you are unnecessary to us.
        2. +14
          6 October 2015 17: 34
          US Air Force Commander Announces First “Visual Contact” between US and Russian Pilots

          The visual contact of an airplane is when they see it with their eyes, and for sworn friends this is the point on the radar.
          And what will happen to them when they really see our DRY in three meters?
          1. +34
            6 October 2015 17: 43
            And what will happen to them when they really see our DRY in three meters?
            the head will stop hurting ... as in advertising - MIG and the head does not hurt =)))
            MIG and the head does not hurt
            1. 0
              6 October 2015 23: 12
              it sounds better! ONLY ONE MIG ....
              1. 0
                7 October 2015 08: 24
                Ghostly everything in this world is raging
                There is only MiG - you do not threaten him
                There is only MiG between past and future ...
                It is he who is called ...

                Eternal peace of the heart is unlikely to please
                Eternal Peace for the Gray Pyramids
                And for <...> that exploded and falls
                There is only MiG - dazzling MiG
                smile
          2. +9
            6 October 2015 18: 31
            Do I have one question about 20 miles? Is their radar so distant?
            1. +5
              6 October 2015 19: 07
              Quote: Alexey Lobanov
              Is their radar so distant?

              1. At what height was the radar carrier?
              2. At what height were ours (target)?
              3.What exactly were ours? (Su-25, Su-30)
              4.Relief?
              5. The F-16D Block 52 + s radar has an APG-68 (V) 9 range for air targets: 296 km (and about 75 km for a target with an ESR of 1 m²), this is for ideal conditions

              AFAR AGP-83 SABR FOR F-16 Fighters (USA)

              still a demo, they began to install only on Taiwanese F-16



              but actually (in the original), Lieutenant General Charles Brown, Air Force Commander of the Central Command of the US Armed Forces, told the channel CBS about "eye contact" (referring to sighting cameras) in Syrian airspace of an American F-16 aircraft with a Russian aircraft .... "The closest was a few miles from our UAVs," Brown said. "But they are not closer than about 1 miles to our20 manned aircraft."

              US pilots flying F-16s out of Turkey first picked up the Russian planes on radar. The Russians closed to within 20 miles, at which point the American pilots could visually identify them on their targeting cameras.

              Lt. Gen. Charles Brown, commander of the American air campaign, said the Russians have come even closer than that to his unmanned drones.

              "The closest has been within a handful of miles of our remotely piloted aircraft," said Brown. "But to our manned aircraft they've not been closer than about 20 miles. "


              The yellow plane is ours (Russian), the green is American (UAV and LA).
          3. +4
            6 October 2015 19: 02
            Quote: figvam
            And what will happen to them when they really see our DRY in three meters?



            Well, in the summer (in my opinion) ours laughed over the Baltic - it was howling ...

            You see, the NATO fighter from the jet of our SU almost fell ...
            1. +4
              6 October 2015 19: 14
              Quote...
              Of the recent successes, the US Air Force has only two defeated excavators ...

              Duc, why are they scaring pilots? Nerves - they are not iron ... laughing
              1. +2
                6 October 2015 21: 15
                Our aviation makes much more sorties than Russians

                The Americans were going to ditch all the excavators in Syria.
            2. +1
              6 October 2015 19: 59
              Well, to be precise, then our MiG 31 frightened the Norwegian pilot, who "cut" him.
              1. +1
                6 October 2015 21: 44
                Quote: leshiy076
                Well, to be precise, then our MiG 31 frightened the Norwegian pilot, who "cut" him.

                Yeah, the dude goes along the right lane at a speed of 1000 km / h, and then he is cut along the LEFT row at a speed of two and a half ... laughing
            3. +1
              7 October 2015 05: 12
              ... such a normal jet means that there’s nothing to be substituted against the wind lol
          4. +2
            6 October 2015 19: 49
            Quote: figvam
            this is the point on the radar.

            By the way, the range of detection by an aircraft radar is much more than 20 miles
          5. 0
            7 October 2015 03: 28
            half-pallet bricks
        3. +5
          6 October 2015 19: 30
          Quote: Samaritan
          now suddenly SU - 30



          Here is another funny thing: SU-30 MKI is armed with N011 Bars radar, which captures a fighter-type target at a distance of up to 140 km, despite the fact that the general says that the Yankes saw our aircraft at a distance of 20 miles (this is 30 -37 km).
          Those. it turns out that we could remove these Yankees, and they would not even have discovered who and from which bearing did this.
          This is beauty !!!
        4. 0
          6 October 2015 21: 56
          Quote: Samaritan
          Only now they talked MIiG - 29. now suddenly SU - 30 ?! thought up nonsense again ?!
          Well then, let's give a video on YouTube, we won’t believe otherwise, you have accustomed us!

          laughing so after all, it’s when you see the eye contact with your eyes, xs there it’s been 20 miles there, and if our planes see their radars only with 20 miles, then probably the PPC is tight with their joy wassat
        5. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
        1. +1
          6 October 2015 18: 01
          Quote: Samaritan
          According to Brown, Russian planes approached US Air Force planes about 20 miles, and this "allowed American pilots to see Russian planes on their radar." This is what "visual contact" looks like, according to the general


          Or maybe the Americans came closer to the Russian cities?
        2. 0
          6 October 2015 18: 01
          Quote: Samaritan
          According to Brown, Russian planes approached US Air Force planes about 20 miles, and this "allowed American pilots to see Russian planes on their radar." This is what "visual contact" looks like, according to the general


          Or maybe the Americans came closer to the Russian cities?
        3. +1
          6 October 2015 19: 09
          Quote: Samaritan
          Well then, let's have a video on YouTube,

          This graphic shows radar tracking of Russians coming close to US planes
      3. +16
        6 October 2015 17: 17
        Quote: Samaritan
        Well, the muzzle :)))


        A muzzle match the last name (Brown - Brown).
        Remember Mironov: "... on the face of the terrible, kind inside ..." - so this is not about him. bully
        1. 0
          6 October 2015 17: 23
          These clowns no longer know what to say and sculpt what comes to mind, without much going into the meaning.
          1. +1
            6 October 2015 19: 13
            Quote: TBM - 75
            These clowns no longer know what to say and sculpt what comes to mind, without much going into the meaning.

            Already said. The US Secretary of Defense himself demanded guarantees:
            MADRID, 6 October - RIA Novosti. US Defense Secretary Ashton Carter said he expects from the Russian side an immediate response to the proposal to agree on the rules for flights over Syria. "We are waiting for the Russians. They have to answer us. They have to do it right now," Carter said while visiting the Spanish-American military base of Moron de la Frontera.

            Now let their pilots buy CTP and CASCO policies if they want complete safety
          2. 0
            7 October 2015 05: 18
            ... why is there any sense? Those for whom this "bazaar" is all grabbed and will still make the same conclusion: Russia is the aggressor ... at least tell them about growing eggplants in the subtropical zone of the Far North, the conclusion will be the same ... everyone will be worried, worried and express ... investing information at the genetic level what
        2. ECT
          +1
          6 October 2015 18: 07
          He is a negro, he is only a cow
        3. 0
          6 October 2015 20: 15
          Quote: Lelek
          Remember Mironov: "... on the face of the terrible, kind inside ..." - so this is not about him.

          They would still have Mondays - take and cancel. And what they do not do business: of the last air "victories" - only excavators.
      4. +1
        6 October 2015 17: 25
        // Well, the muzzle:))) ///

        It’s a normal face .. Match surnames: Brown Charles))))
      5. +5
        6 October 2015 17: 30
        Quote: Samaritan
        Well, the muzzle :)))


        The physiognomy of a typical contactor! laughing
        1. 0
          7 October 2015 11: 17
          Quote: BMP-2
          The physiognomy of a typical contactor!


          The dentures were put in the wrong size. bully
      6. 0
        6 October 2015 18: 01
        this is the face of a baboon, a fellow baobab! laughing
        The intelligence on the face is directly written, to ask this shot, there is more in the sky, but where is the big result then?
        (even here arrogance, such as the fact that there are Russians, fly very little. Not that WE laughing )
        1. 0
          6 October 2015 19: 35
          Well, if the photo is US Air Force commander Charles Brown, then he chose the wrong profession, he would be better off acting in comedies.
      7. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +1
      6 October 2015 17: 13
      Nothing, they will soon meet the aces of Wang-yu-shin and Li-si-ching ... Although what can you call them in Arabic? )))
      1. +4
        6 October 2015 17: 15
        Our aviation makes much more sorties than Russians.
        It is free for them to fly and spend fuel for nothing. The effectiveness of mattress flights zilch. And our falcons fly less often, or rather. Mattresses are far from them laughing
      2. +5
        6 October 2015 17: 20
        Vlad Ymir al Put Din, personally managing each aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces!
        1. +15
          6 October 2015 17: 27
          It will be something like this: Vi Rusky Ivyan lying all, we have a video:
          1. -8
            6 October 2015 17: 35
            or so: here are our specifications:
            1. +11
              6 October 2015 20: 11
              Su-37 in an American science fiction movie ???????????????? smile
              This is equivalent, as now compare, the same planes as, for example, IL-2 of the Second World War with the modern T-50.
              Guys, the SU-37 in this passage of the film is compared with the fantastic aircraft of the future!
              Is this a real advertisement of the advantages of the SU-37 !!!
              1. +1
                6 October 2015 21: 11
                This is a film (where I was minus) "stealth", about "high" US technologies and their eternal anti-moral behavior!
              2. 0
                6 October 2015 22: 05
                Quote: Alex20042004
                This is equivalent, as now compare, the same planes as, for example, IL-2 of the Second World War with the modern T-50.
                Guys, the SU-37 in this passage of the film is compared with the fantastic aircraft of the future!
                Is this a real advertisement of the advantages of the SU-37 !!!

                belay so they also use the tricks of our planes with drag and turn in their film
                1. 0
                  7 October 2015 17: 07
                  Quote: Corsair
                  so they also use the tricks of our planes with drag and turn in their film

                  they use tubes that generate such overloads that no aircraft would have survived and would simply be dismissed. I am already silent when approaching a couple of meters on opposite courses. in short "svyatoyles", as always, struggles with common sense, logic and physics laughing
          2. +1
            6 October 2015 17: 51
            Americans are able to make advertising, one thing I didn’t understand about the dispersion of warm air and thereby knocking down the thermal head of the rocket from the target, and the engine itself does not heat up, and the skin of the plane when flying in super sound?
            1. +1
              6 October 2015 18: 14
              Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
              Americans are able to make advertising, one thing I didn’t understand about the dispersion of warm air and thereby knocking down the thermal head of the rocket from the target, and the engine itself does not heat up, and the skin of the plane when flying in super sound?


              I found a competent am
              It's not for you smart ones, it's for NATO members and the US sixes, they can't think, they believe everything that the "gods" from Washington say fellow
              1. +1
                7 October 2015 05: 29
                ... this is for taxpayers from the United States ... the same thing, such as training super-fighters to fight ISIS ($ 500 million) and modernizing the Abrams (xs skoka million), well, like "bury your money in the ground at midnight .. .WHERE?!" request
            2. The comment was deleted.
          3. +1
            6 October 2015 19: 11
            Quote: Samaritan
            It will be something like this:


            At the suggestion of the Russian pilot to conduct a training battle - there were no volunteers ...

            "Su-37 is the master of the sky" ... And this is the American test pilot speaking !!!

            And aerobatics, of course - is super !!!
    4. +2
      6 October 2015 18: 33
      Visual, this is when not on the radar, but through the lantern of the plane, you can see that your "opponent" folds out of your fingers laughing
    5. +1
      6 October 2015 18: 48
      Quote: Turbo-Rabbit
      Hmm, however. The most visual such contact.

      What kind of circus, not the air force?
      Print booklets for your pilots, take a movie or something ...........
    6. 0
      6 October 2015 21: 12
      Yeah, I can imagine what would happen if the SU-34 waved its wings 5 ​​meters from them. laughing
    7. 0
      7 October 2015 05: 10
      Our aviation makes much more sorties than Russians

      ... there’s no sense only in this ... well, except for the excavators broken by the valiant one-year-olds ...
    8. 0
      7 October 2015 08: 20
      In this it is interesting that they always shouted that their planes were the best and would see the enemy almost from the runway. And it seems like super-super-long-range missiles are being attacked before the vile Russians can do something in return. And here it’s only 20 miles. Moreover, they admit that OURS came with them to rapprochement. That is, ours saw them at a greater distance and went to intercept.
      And why, at a 25-mile distance is not fate? The United States is blowing everywhere for the range of detection and attack of any enemy in an air battle for 100 miles.
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. +2
    6 October 2015 17: 08

    Charles Brown:
    Our aircraft makes much more sorties than Russians. If we have to go around Russian planes in Syria’s airspace, then for a short time.


    At the same time, the US Air Force commander for some reason did not explain how it turns out that American aircraft and drones are in the skies of Syria significantly more Russian in time, and of the recent successes of the US Air Force - only two defeated excavators ...

    laughing laughing laughing
    1. 0
      6 October 2015 17: 37
      Hmm, getting around our planes is best for 20 miles. Closer it is dangerous to approach. It’s good that even our planes are much smaller than the American ones, otherwise they wouldn’t dare take off at all.
    2. 0
      6 October 2015 19: 08
      He said it right. And they bombed those who wanted to take more from oil. Everything is just business, nothing more. And nobody steals anything there. Have you heard at least one complaint that supposedly oil is being stolen from companies extracting it. I do not. All these gossip about theft is for the average person that I would not have thought about what was happening there. The Yankees know exactly what is happening there and are not worried. An alarm rises when a greedy and untrusted one begins to demand more. The answer is instant in the form of bombs and missiles. So that others are not strangers.
    3. 0
      7 October 2015 05: 51
      ... well, they just "are in the sky", the clock flies out and the motor resource (apologizing in advance, not an aviator, so I don’t know exactly what it’s called), well, there may be winglets waving to ISIS brothers-in-arms ... but about excavators tomorrow or even tonight they will make round eyes and say that they have nothing to do with this regrettable fact ... we are MILITARY Christmas trees, why should we bomb excavators? This is most likely Russia (we even have a movie on YouTube about it) or the Assad-ghouls spoil everything so that normal moderate people do not get it ...
  4. VP
    +4
    6 October 2015 17: 08
    What kind of radar is 20 miles?
    Our go there at a height, against the background of the earth are not disguised.
  5. +4
    6 October 2015 17: 11
    That Vasya, then not Vasya. Fighters are rushing about like a whore between two beds. And it’s scary to be out of work, and accidentally find yourself in the way of Russian aircraft. Here the poor fellow are jumping back and forth, not knowing what to do, there will be something else when the world community finally sees the light and realizes that its contributions to the NATO box office are allowed to go for wrong purposes.
    1. 0
      7 October 2015 05: 55
      ... but how long can you begin to see clearly? A WHOLE YEAR the states are busy there, they are pulling money from everyone, and the "seeing" are silent ... we need to help their insight through some small, but terrible revolution ... in the usa naturally ... in Europe it’s just about this The revolutionary movement is already used to it ...
  6. +3
    6 October 2015 17: 11
    Washington's opinion changes several times in one day.
    Washington just has several, one for allies from the Persian Gulf, another for Europe, third for Russia, fourth for domestic use, I suspect there are several more ...
  7. +1
    6 October 2015 17: 11
    We looked at the radars through binoculars. It looks like panic is growing behind the puddle - they are chattering at random. They really want to show "these Russians" the American "mother of Kuzma" - but there is no such ...
  8. +18
    6 October 2015 17: 11
    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2015/159/xzzk205.jpg

    So in Syria, they were most likely useful ... !!!
    1. +7
      6 October 2015 17: 21
      Turks also put bricks in their pants
      1. jjj
        +1
        6 October 2015 18: 23
        Already eight !!! How bids are rising
  9. +25
    6 October 2015 17: 11
    It only occurred to me ... At the numerous requests of American pilots, we are passing them the song "Phantom" performed by Sergei Chigrakov:

    1. +1
      6 October 2015 17: 42
      What Ukrainian ... hell, then Mujahideen paradise or what? Or vice versa?
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. +1
    6 October 2015 17: 13
    The question then is different - What then will they call when they really see DRY visually ????

    3 answer options

    1. dangerous proximity
    2. cropped
    3. Attack Attempt

    another - it's time to change diapers.
    1. 0
      7 October 2015 00: 31
      Quote: Hedgehog
      What then will they call when they really see DRY visually ????

      Catapult is the salvation ...
    2. 0
      7 October 2015 08: 53
      ... "express concern" was not entered ...
  12. +6
    6 October 2015 17: 14
    It seemed that Kerry (well, the head of the US Foreign Office) said that the Turks had the right to shoot down a "lost" Russian plane. I think that after that the US Air Force should be more careful when crossing the Syrian border. Assad's air defense also has the right to shoot them down ...
  13. +2
    6 October 2015 17: 17
    What kind of visual contact is this? On the locator screen, can you see 200 or 2000km and it will also be visual? Translation inaccuracies?
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. +5
    6 October 2015 17: 18
    According to Brown, Russian planes approached the US Air Force at a distance of about 20 miles, and this "allowed American pilots to see Russian planes on their radars."


    20 miles - a little over 30 km. Well, if American planes see it like that with their radars, then it's better for them not to appear there at all.
    1. 0
      6 October 2015 18: 54
      How did they determine from the mark on the radar that these were Russian aircraft? Very simple - they see all the other planes for 100 miles.
      1. +5
        6 October 2015 19: 25
        Wrong answer. Others do not fly there. And ours do not know at all that this is a restricted area. Not for nothing they began to hint that they would divide the zones where we are and where you will fly. Remember the President’s words over the entire territory of the state of Syria. This was a lot of taboos to the Syrian air force and ours just don’t know. It's just arrogance forgive me. The US Air Force always flew here and bearded did not have. And the rooks flew in and instantly found right insolently began to drop bombs in front of our eyes. Disorder. Remember the first sentence after the shock from our strike in the north where they destroyed something, plunging the USA into shock. Tell the mole in advance where you will bomb. And our answer is generally interesting. We supposedly coordinate all the objects of the bombing with the legal representatives of the Syrian authorities. We agree with the leadership of the Syrian Army. If you wish to participate, please. The USA said nothing for two days, then Assad Tiran said. A thoughtful conclusion.
  16. +2
    6 October 2015 17: 20
    At the same time, Washington accused the Russian Aerospace Forces of allegedly not being ISIS terrorists.

    yeah, only those appointed by the American authorities laughing
  17. +4
    6 October 2015 17: 20
    Our military-political leadership needs to firmly move forward. Consultations with a potential adversary will not bring any benefit. Mattresses drag out time and make it possible for all terrorists to regroup, replenish human reserves and rearm to fight our VKS. Ahead, I think, a provocation awaits us. The goal is to compromise our country in the eyes of the world community and close the Syrian sky for the flights of our aircraft
  18. 0
    6 October 2015 17: 21
    two excavators, and (SOMEWHERE SOMETHING WRITTEN) one motorcycle.
  19. +3
    6 October 2015 17: 21
    "Our aircraft makes many more flights than the Russians."

    And where does she fly in this case? On picnics, apparently?
    1. 0
      6 October 2015 18: 18
      TAKE OUT THE TERRORISTS IN LEBANON.
  20. "Allowed American pilots to see Russian planes on their radars"

    Pray that this is not the last thing your pilots see! drinks wink
  21. +1
    6 October 2015 17: 25
    Weak contact. They saw us 30 km (20 miles) away, but how long did we observe? And then "politely" lit up on their screens? The distance is lethal.
  22. 0
    6 October 2015 17: 28
    What account did this contact end with? It is a pity that none of our flyers wanted to get to know each other. I noticed interestingly that the United States has much more sorties ... (That's just a lot less sense).
  23. 0
    6 October 2015 17: 30
    The first impression is always when the person’s video is ambiguous. Looking at the photo of this command, the impression is that you look at some moron in pagons.
  24. 0
    6 October 2015 17: 33
    Durilka cardboard bully eprst, the potato in his jacket spoke, pinch me bully
  25. +1
    6 October 2015 17: 34
    Now they started talking about consultations again after seeing Russian airplanes on radars. Washington's opinion changes several times in one day.

    Like children: "We are bigger! We are longer! We are more often!"
    The "exceptional" ones shimmer. For some reason, ours do not shout to the whole world that they saw someone on their radars!
  26. +1
    6 October 2015 17: 38
    americos destroyed 2 tactical excavators)
    1. +1
      6 October 2015 17: 44
      Quote: EDDI 76
      Merikos destroyed 2 tactical excavators)

      They would have gotten dirty - the excavators were STRATEGIC))
  27. The comment was deleted.
  28. mihasik
    0
    6 October 2015 17: 40
    Look at how he was pissed off!) See photo. Satisfied with such that he saw Russian for the first time in his life! Rejoices!)
    What is it for?)
  29. +1
    6 October 2015 17: 45
    Then the Turks cried that our planes flew to them. Now the Americans will howl that we bomb their excavators. And where to go to our pilots.
    1. +3
      6 October 2015 17: 59
      Quote: roskot
      Then the Turks cried

      the Turks are crying again now our plane kept sight as much as EIGHT Turkish
      An unidentified MiG-29 on Monday, October 5, interfered with eight Turkish F-16S patrolling the border with Syria. According to the Turkish General Staff on October 6, the MiG-29 kept Turkish fighters at the sight of its radar for 4 minutes 30 seconds.

      The Turkish army said that, in addition to the actions of the MiG-29, the air defense system located on the territory of Syria prevented the patrolling of the border, which took Turkish fighters to the sight of their radar and kept them on the sight for 4 minutes 15 seconds.


      Read more at RBC:
      http://top.rbc.ru/politics/06/10/2015/5613c01b9a7947f208f591cc
  30. 0
    6 October 2015 17: 46
    Quote: Good AAAH
    My friends, read about the role of Israel in the light of the Arab mess.

    Meanwhile, Rabbi Avraam Shmulevich, the ideologist of the influential “hypersionism” in the Israeli elite’s circles, spoke about this interest very frankly in his interviews back in 2011 [2]. Recall that he praised the “Arab spring” as a blessing for Israel, saying: “The Muslim world will plunge into a state of chaos, and this will be a positive development for Jews. Chaos is the best time to take control of the situation and turn on the Jewish civilization system. Now there is a struggle over who will be the spiritual leader of mankind - Rome (West) or Israel ... Now we must take complete control in our hands ... We will not just buy the Arab elite, but we will feed it and educate ourselves. .. A person who receives freedom must simultaneously receive instructions on how to use this freedom. And we, the Jews, will write this instruction to humanity ... The Jewish heyday comes again in the fire of the Arab revolutions ”[3].

    Full Chetverikova article on

    http://communitarian.ru/publikacii/bolshoy_blizhniy_vostok/izrail_v_teni_amerika

    nskoy_geopolitiki_02112013 /

    And extremists everywhere are lacking, and not only in Israel. And we have scumbags in the person of ** moderate opposition ** are enough. But thank God they are not in power
    1. +3
      6 October 2015 18: 05
      These Zionists are the core fused with the transnationals; in fact, they dominate in the West. Hence the slender attacks on Russia. Consider that the West is a tool in their hands to achieve their goals. There will be no other pole led by Russia, they will begin to carry out even wilder plans for transforming the world. The Satanic ideology pursued in the West is their work.
      The hindrance is Russia, so it attacks us. We remain a guarantee of the normal existence of countries.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  31. +2
    6 October 2015 17: 49
    On radars, of course, it’s not scary. That smiles.
  32. +2
    6 October 2015 17: 52
    Cool guys with fragments from a kaba in the ass in horror are falling where they look! Second cool boys on fashionable toys graze away. Everything is fine, sitting in their sandbox, wipes off each other’s nozzles, mummying their mom, everything is fine !!!
  33. 0
    6 October 2015 17: 56
    and of the recent successes with the US Air Force - only two defeated excavators ...
    and a camp of doctors without borders .... in the next world they’re auknitso ... and maybe this (I would like)

  34. +1
    6 October 2015 18: 04
    Russian planes saw, but ISIS do not see. Baska twist to view Assad.
  35. The comment was deleted.
  36. 0
    6 October 2015 18: 14
    Kapets, - coordinate actions to prevent incidents. You might think ISIS has planes, or is someone else opposing the global coalition? Or is Russian aviation going to shoot down any air target in the sky of Syria? They are talking nonsense.
  37. +1
    6 October 2015 18: 15
    Explicit behavior of whores changing shoes several times a day. They are trying to keep a good face in a bad game, as it happened many times before, but this time it doesn’t roll
  38. The comment was deleted.
  39. The comment was deleted.
  40. +1
    6 October 2015 18: 32
    Literally from the words of the general himself. "We were able to identify targets as Russian aircraft when they approached 20 km to our aircraft. At such a distance they could be recognized in the cameras of the sighting system ..."
    Those. the general claimed that the F-16s were equipped with cameras, the resolution and optics of which make it possible to recognize the types of aircraft at a distance of 20km.
  41. 0
    6 October 2015 18: 32
    The US Air Force Commander announced the first "visual contact" between American and Russian pilots /
    And what unprecedented news, or was he thinking there to see flying elephants ...
  42. The comment was deleted.
  43. +1
    6 October 2015 18: 41
    False. They saw it in a video on Twitter, psaki said so after asking and consulting
  44. +2
    6 October 2015 18: 41
    Gentlemen, let's not slide into the comments to one site that is widely known in narrow circles ;-)

    In the original text, it turns out that: "they got close by 20 miles, and the American pilots were able to identify them with targeting cameras" so the translation is not well worked out ;-)

    So who would I, poorly, still explain what targeting cameras are? is it an analogue of our OLS?

    http://www.cbsnews.com/news/russian-aircraft-makes-close-contact-with-u-s-war-pl
    anes-over-syria / - original
  45. 0
    6 October 2015 18: 50
    Interestingly, and on the radar was the inscription "Obama-" and the middle finger? laughing They have a strange understanding of visual contact. Although this explains their awareness on many issues.
  46. 0
    6 October 2015 18: 52
    Americans think that ours fly-fly and go home. Wrong! I think that we will not go out of nowhere where we came to protect and help.
  47. -1
    6 October 2015 18: 54
    A man with a scrotum on his face .. Look at the photo, he has testicles on his cheekbones. What can you talk about with an egghead? Ah, I'm sorry, I'm a doctor, I’m allowed such humor. feel
  48. +1
    6 October 2015 18: 59
    " successful negotiations will reduce risks for American and Russian aircraft"...

    According to the rules of the site, you can’t incite ethnic and international hatred, but you really want this palm-born to take care first of all of preventing not Russian, but Amer’s planes ...

    In Korea, ours were beaten on the MiG-15 by Sabers, who at that time had more powerful characteristics of the mounted sights and weapons that our pilots did not have ...

    Yes, and on the Elbe, ours could bring them to the second Dunkirk ... it is a pity that Stalin did not give, he felt sorry for the "allies" ...
  49. 0
    6 October 2015 19: 01
    A change of opinion indicates the absence of any strategy. The Yankees realized that this time they were up against the Russians, and no one wanted to fight the Russians and they didn’t want to because of the amb. And at the same time, you need to somehow try to get out of the created swamp themselves, and preferably with a benefit for yourself, but this time it will not work.
  50. +1
    6 October 2015 19: 28
    It makes no sense to consult with them, all the same they will pull a blanket on themselves. Do we need this? we need to get rid of ISIS once and for all. This is our task and not sharpening ales with amers.
  51. 0
    6 October 2015 19: 35
    “We would like to remind you that just a few hours ago the same Pentagon stated that they do not intend to hold any consultations with Russia as long as Russia “supports Assad.” At the same time, Washington accused the Russian Aerospace Forces of the fact that ISIS terrorists were not allegedly the targets of airstrikes are."

    And we remind you that the SGA aviation has no business doing anything in the skies of Syria - no one invited them there, so let them bomb excavators in Afghanistan! Our Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, together with the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the SAR, need to give a warning to American representatives about the inadmissibility of their aircraft appearing in the skies of Syria and that if this happens again, they are not responsible for the consequences of an unauthorized flight! am Or let them ask Syria for permission to fly. laughing
    This will be their gratitude for the long and “successful” fight against ISIS in Syria! hi
  52. 0
    6 October 2015 19: 37
    Attention THIS IS VISUAL CONTACT!!!
  53. 0
    6 October 2015 19: 42
    I would not like, purely as a human being, to discuss the face of Count Brown. In the end, it is not his fault and it would be fairer to file a complaint about this with his parents. But regarding intelligence and education, again the words of M.I. Zadornov come to mind and the co-host of Mayak radio Tim Kirby comes to mind, who has lived in the Russian Federation for 20 years and still pays SGA for his higher education.
  54. 0
    6 October 2015 19: 45
    Quote: EDDI 76
    americos destroyed 2 tactical excavators)

    yeah, and with their help they liberated Tikrit, Kobani, Sarrin and a bunch of other territories.
    But it’s better to repeat the nonsense about excavators
  55. 0
    6 October 2015 19: 49
    It’s somehow not clear with whom and what kind of contact there was? Dot on the screen? Gorgeous! Well, the states know how to chatter, that’s their essence. Purely a Cheshire cat, not a state.
  56. +1
    6 October 2015 20: 01
    and this is not Forrest Gump's friend.
  57. 0
    6 October 2015 20: 07
    Quote: Samaritan
    or so: here are our specifications:

    Test video! Only a little out of line, instead of our (Korean) dryers, their f22 and f15, but instead of wunderwaffles, the dryers are just right for maneuverability!!!
  58. 0
    6 October 2015 20: 14
    Quote: opus
    The yellow plane is ours (Russian), the green is American (UAVs and aircraft)

    It’s also interesting to know whose planes are blue and purple? winked
  59. 0
    6 October 2015 20: 46
    For you, Stars and Stripes, it is better that this contact ALWAYS remains ONLY visual. stop
  60. 0
    6 October 2015 22: 03
    our pilots are the best in the world. We are afraid to make visual contact with our planes. It is enough to simply irradiate their plane with our radar (for example, the Su-29) for their pilots to go on the course of their bases.
  61. 0
    6 October 2015 23: 02
    Our aviation makes much more sorties than Russians.
    I wonder how many flights you fly there. Do you have permission? What is the return from this mouse fuss of yours?
  62. 0
    7 October 2015 03: 28
    Ha! Amers change not only their opinions several times a day, but also their diapers, after marks on the radar. fool
  63. 0
    7 October 2015 05: 04
    I look at this smug guy from the US Air Force, well, his whole chest is covered in medal bars, he probably received them for his successes in the struggle for the “liberation” of the peoples of the world, and it becomes funny from the words of this self-praising “liberator”...
  64. rat
    0
    7 October 2015 10: 08
    US Defense Secretary Ashton Carter said he expects an urgent response from the Russian side to the proposal to harmonize flight rules over Syrian territory. We are waiting for the Russians. They must answer us. They must do it now,” Carter said during a visit to the Spanish-American military base of Moron de la Frontera.

    A very stupid and stubborn person in his stupidity is called - D*****b. From the high rostrum of the UN General Assembly, the Russian President very clearly explained, even for them, that according to world legislation, only Russian aviation has the right to carry out combat missions in Syrian airspace. So why is it unclear? What are the answers? And if they don’t answer, then what – do the Americans agree to fly home from Syria with zinc? Stupid and stubborn people in their stupidity!
  65. 0
    7 October 2015 22: 57
    "and of the latest successes of the US Air Force - only two defeated excavators..."

    And the hospital

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"