Fight empires. The glance of Russians who never voted for Putin

108
Evaluating what is happening in the world, I can not get rid of the thought that all this is very similar to the duel of two boxers in the ring! With fraudulent and real blows, defense and fraud movements. And all this would be very spectacular, if it were not for the fact that the whole world in this fight is a ring, and the countries and people in it are only tools like boxing gloves and doping!

Probably no need to try to get to the answer - who started and who is to blame. The origins of mutual distrust, rivalry and enmity are rooted in World War II. By the end of which there are only two real forces in the world. Forces following each other, fearing the power of each other and wishing to destroy a competitor.

We will not touch stories confrontation between the two powers during the Cold War. We start from the moment of our euphoria from “perestroika” and “publicity”, from the feeling that the whole world is our friends and brothers. Recall how easily the Soviet Union collapsed, how Yeltsin’s Russia slipped from greatness and strength to shame and poverty. Recall how our "American friends" first slowly, and then faster and faster, cleaned up the hands of our allies. As we meekly surrendered one position after another, until the bombing of Serbia and the rejection of Kosovo did not show even the most distant of us, to which we can come if we do not fight back. But 90 passed, zero arrived, and Russia gradually began to climb out of the hole into which it landed. From that moment began the real duel of the two empires. At first, timidly, and then stronger and stronger, Russia began to respond to blows!

Let's follow the course of the fight.

2000. Russia regains control over Chechnya.

2001 United States launched a military operation in Afghanistan.

2002 Russia creates the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO).

2003 — 2005 The United States invades Iraq and rolls in technology "color" revolutions. In Georgia, put President Saakashvili. In Ukraine, the bet is made on Yushchenko.
In Lebanon, the withdrawal of Syrian troops Bashar Assad.
In Kyrgyzstan, seeking the expulsion of the pro-Russian President Askar Akayev.
In Uzbekistan, however, an attempt to revolt was resolutely suppressed by President Islam Karimov, which immediately caused US condemnation and sanctions.

2008 Russia protects South Ossetia from the Georgian invasion and smashes the pro-American army of Saakashvili.

2011-2012 The United States begins the cycle of revolutions of the Arab Spring.
The revolution in Tunisia.
The revolution in Egypt and the overthrow of President Hosni Mubarak.
The revolution in Yemen and the overthrow of President Saleh.
The civil war in Libya, the overthrow and murder of Muammar Gaddafi.
NATO is openly fighting on the side of the rebels.
The Syrian civil war between supporters of President Assad and the US-backed insurgents.
Chaos in North Africa and the Middle East. Strengthening Islamic extremists and the emergence of ISIS.

2013 Russia does not allow the United States to crush Syria, agreeing to eliminate the Syrian chemical weapons.

2014-2015 The United States is organizing a coup in Ukraine. The weak president Yanukovych is overthrown, nationalists and supporters of the United States come to power.
Russia includes Crimea, ridding it of chaos, instability and civil war that began in Ukraine.
The pro-Russian militia of Donbass is smashing the pro-American army of Ukraine, led by nationalists and proteges of the United States.
The United States and its allies are imposing a sanctions regime and are trying to achieve the international isolation of Russia.
The increasing chaos in North Africa and the Middle East. Flows of refugees from Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria swept Europe.
Russia amid the failures of US policy in the Middle East and Africa, amid desertion and joining ISIS, trained by the USA, Syrian opposition units, amid a massive influx of refugees into Europe frustrates the US attempt to leave it in international isolation and joins the fight against ISIS Syrian government. Operation begins to support our aviation Syrian troops.

What will happen next and where will the USA strike?

Will provoke clashes between Armenia and Azerbaijan in Nagorno-Karabakh?
They destabilize the situation in Kazakhstan, where the question of what will happen after Nazarbayev begins to be raised?
Use instability in Tajikistan and tensions in the Osh Valley in Kyrgyzstan?
Is fermentation used in Moldova so that we will have to react in some way, defending Transnistria?
Destabilize Belarus? (But so far, at least outwardly, Lukashenko is in control of the situation, and his age does not cause concern (as is the case with Nazarbayev.)

I can definitely say that they are required;
- they use Ukraine, if not as the main attack, then as a deceitful, diverting maneuver of one hundred percent;
- will begin to inflate in the world press rumors about the victims of Russian attacks among civilians and moderate opposition in Syria. There may be reports of downed Russian aircraft or shot down by Russian NATO aircraft, erroneous and inaccurate actions of Russian aviation.

And one more important point. Joining the fight against ISIS increased the risk of terrorist attacks against the people of Russia. This idea will be intensely exaggerated in order to create an atmosphere of fear and uncertainty within the country. Any failures of the army, a downed plane, a dead or captured pilot, will surely cause a storm of criticism from homegrown "fighters for a free world and democracy" working for American wages! Every opportunity to weaken Russia will be used by the United States to the full!

In general, the ball in this terrible game is now on the side of the USA, and we can only wait, trying to predict and prepare the meeting where it will fly! And now we have to work on our next blow!

And I, because I do not want chaos and destruction at home, next time I will go and vote for Putin! Thanks to the Americans!
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

108 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    8 October 2015 05: 32
    Life is a struggle, our country and our people cannot survive if we stand and smoke aside. Yes, it’s dangerous, but it’s always dangerous to live, so as not to get into the coffin right away, you need to get into the ring whenever possible.
    1. +37
      8 October 2015 06: 06
      War - anywhere and whatever it is, the bread of an American backstage! Vorotiliki from the military industrial complex put their presidents, and not quite their own - they kill! Obama can not do anything, even if he wanted to - he is a puppet! Rather, he needs to pay his debts to the guys who put him in the Oval Office - this vicious practice in the United States, for more than a dozen years! Everything is not always smooth and Congress is a little in the way, as it is now with full-blown arms deliveries to Ukraine, but nevertheless hawks are pushing the deliveries of their farts and whistles drop by drop ... Color revolutions are always chaos, which could possibly lead to a big mess in Europe or Middle east! These kids will always need the Third Reich, ISIS or corrupt, shallow pseudo heads of state, such as Poroshenko or Mishiko, who can be poisoned in Russia! Because, if Russia harnesses, this is super mega profit!
      Nothing personal, as they say - just a business!
      The GDP is good, but it was extremely difficult for him to get away from the pro-American oligarchic hook on which he put the whole country, first labeled bl ..., and then the Ural bukhar (forgive me the inhabitants of the Urals)! Although he still has to fight and fight with it - there are enough selling nits!
      1. +11
        8 October 2015 06: 37
        Quote: Finches
        War - anywhere and whatever it is, the bread of an American backstage!

        americans this is a temporary stage
        the war has been going on all the time as Russia entered the world stage, the centers of power just changed, now these are Americans before that there were limes before this Vatican, we are completely different and this will never be forgiven us
        1. +3
          8 October 2015 14: 07
          I will express my own opinion, maybe I'm wrong.

          My president has never been associated with the internal politics of the state.
          In aspects of domestic politics, there are specific officials - ministers. And their boss, prime minister. And then descending to the governors, mayors and heads of districts.
          Simply put, I do not think that the president should bridge the street in front of my house.
          Perhaps that is why I do not blame Putin for all the troubles of Russia (but I am a realist, we have a lot of trouble).
          For me, the president is, first of all, the face of the state, representing foreign policy and making global decisions, on my behalf in particular. And he copes with this.
          I am not ashamed of him at press conferences, as it was for Yeltsin. I am sure that he will be able to make a difficult decision, unlike the soft-bodied Gorbachev.

          I have no doubt that Putin, if so necessary, could solve any particular problem within the Russian Federation. The only question is - who will lead the foreign policy then, and deal with Ukraine, Syria, Nata, the USA and others? Like it or not, only the president has the authority to make decisions of this rank.

          Probably, if we didn’t have any external priorities now, Putin could only be in charge of domestic policy entirely. But these are the times.

          I’m not trying to idealize Putin at all - I have a lot of questions about his presidency and his relations with the oligarchs. But I am sure that this is the best candidate for this post today, and I do not see an adequate replacement on the horizon.
          When our liberals, demanding the resignation of Putin, show me a worthy candidate, I could probably support him. But what they are showing now is frankly weak personalities to whom there is neither trust nor confidence in their abilities.
      2. +3
        8 October 2015 07: 25
        Well, what are you, Mr. Zyablitsev, EBN is nothing more than "Ural Nugget" from the village of Butki. It is a pity that they had not been imprisoned for robbing an arms store in due time. The scoundrel ran away to watch Russia! from the roofs of cars and brake platforms.
        1. +9
          8 October 2015 07: 44
          At one time, I don’t remember which American politician said: Whatever the policy of the USSR (Russia), it does not have a right to exist.
          So expect fraternal feelings from them.
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. +10
        8 October 2015 07: 53
        Quote: Finches
        GDP is good, but it was extremely difficult for him to get away from that pro-American oligarchic hook

        Everything is according to plan and in stages. First, the battle for integrity and so as not to be cut off from the Caucasian ridge during the second Chechen one, then the battle for the Ridge (now our economic and political centers are protected by a fortress with walls thousands of meters). Then there was the battle for the Black Sea. And finally, for the first time in recent history, Russia has now reached the "international" level, even beyond the CIS limit. All stages go with the development of the corresponding line of weapons, and access to the international level also with the development of a missile gag to plug the company of the newly-made hegemon. And I am glad that Iran, by the way, geographically included in the Heartland, is simply on our side, well, we will not give it offense, because the Aryans must help each other ...
        1. +10
          8 October 2015 08: 32
          Quote: hrych
          All according to plan and in stages.

          I agree, but I am more impressed by the other picture, in which the Heartland occupies a larger territory, which includes the Black Sea
          1. +4
            8 October 2015 08: 52
            We should drop sympathy, the Heartland is primarily geological in nature. Initially, it almost repeated the contours of the drainage basin of the Arctic Ocean and the drainless basin of central Eurasia (including the basins of the Caspian and Aral seas). Which coincides with the lithospheric plates and the "folds" they form - mountains. Another thing is that the millennial holders of the true firmament of the Planet - the Aryans periodically put pressure on those around them, bringing the light of enlightenment and scientific progress. The truth is getting back all kinds of nasty things, such as the Abrahamic religions and totalitarian bloody sects, sexual perversion and this disease. Then Hartled digests this and repeats everything. At the moment, Hartled again tried to "squeeze", but received a return from the "spring". Hartland held out and went on the attack especially on the southwestern front ...
            1. GDP
              +1
              8 October 2015 13: 10
              In geopolitical and hydrographic terms, the Black Sea is a closed basin, water does not flow out of it back into the Mediterranean Sea, and the strait itself for Turkey is locked to the key by the states of Turkey ...
              So at least the northern and eastern Black Sea coast falls into the Heartland zone.
  2. +10
    8 October 2015 05: 35
    Probably, you should not try to get to the bottom of the answer - who started and who is to blame.

    You definitely do not need to dig. And trying the wrong word! Everything is already very clear. You just need to remember !!! A good memory has not stopped anyone yet.
  3. +2
    8 October 2015 05: 35
    They are afraid of wolves, do not go to the forest
  4. +4
    8 October 2015 05: 35
    "a duel between two boxers in the ring", "a ball in this terrible game" - in my opinion, are not successful comparisons of the global confrontation between two superpowers
    1. 0
      8 October 2015 06: 38
      Quote: Human-DV
      global confrontation between two superpowers

      in no time, two civilizations of European and Eurasian
  5. +8
    8 October 2015 05: 37
    I agree completely. The game is such that it is impossible to relax. And Ukraine can and will be a locomotive of anti-Russian actions, or it can be left so that it would distract us. And they’ll hit in Central Asia. It so happened that we are surrounded either by enemies or indifferent. Again by ourselves ...
    1. +1
      8 October 2015 06: 25
      Quote: Tatarus
      And they’ll hit in Central Asia.

      And it seems to me that it will start from the Baltics. Yes, everything can be expected from "our Western partners"
      1. Erg
        +2
        8 October 2015 08: 52
        It has already begun. Did not notice?
  6. +7
    8 October 2015 05: 37
    Greetings to all! Like the author, I never voted for GDP, but I fully support his policy. It’s just that he leads a duel on the Great Chessboard rather than in the ring. And as we see quite successfully. hi
    1. -4
      8 October 2015 06: 14
      There is no doubt a good article, but one hundred pounds is ordered from it.
      1. +2
        8 October 2015 06: 40
        Quote: afdjhbn67
        The article is good no doubt

        frankly, I did not see any good analysis, the listing of "collisions" of the 21st century is so without the author, everyone knows, the statement that the conflict began during WWII is generally mistaken
        1. 0
          8 October 2015 07: 18
          Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
          the statement that the conflict began during WWII is generally erroneous

          Really? Here, read if you did not know and pay attention to the date 7 November:
          "On November 7, 1944, US aircraft attacked the disposition of Soviet troops." http://oko-planet.su/history/historydiscussions/147470-7-noyabrya-1944-goda-avia
          ciya-ssha-nanesla-udar-po-raspolozheniyu-voysk-sovetskogo-soyuza.html
          But about the sinking of Soviet merchant ships: http://topwar.ru/12923-amerikanskaya-druzheskaya-pomosch.html
          1. +2
            8 October 2015 08: 45
            So what?!
            "conflict" has been going on for centuries and you are talking about the Second World War, that is, neither you nor the author have an analysis of the situation
        2. +3
          8 October 2015 08: 32
          The person wrote what he thought - thank him for that. What a manner to question everything, or rather self-conceit. Such as you discourage many from sharing their thoughts about what is happening in the world. Another person woke up from the philistine hibernation, and you hit him on the head with his butt. Be kinder.
          1. 0
            8 October 2015 08: 54
            Quote: oracul
            What a manner to question everything

            this is just an absolutely normal manner
            and as for opinions and conceit, if a person writes with a claim to analytics, then forgive me and treat the article as analytical and not as a conversation in the kitchen, where everyone has his own opinion to which he has the right.
            1. +1
              8 October 2015 10: 49
              Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
              I relate to the article as analytical and not as a conversation in the kitchen, where everyone has his own opinion to which he has the right

              In your opinion, it turns out that the analyst does not have the right to his own opinion, right?

              Did I understand you correctly?
              1. +1
                8 October 2015 11: 32
                the analyst must give calculations based on a competent analysis of events, he can make mistakes like any person, but the main thing is analysis and a comprehensive review of events and their consequences, and the article is, as it were, analytical but in terms of scope and depth - a kitchen conversation
        3. +1
          8 October 2015 09: 00
          Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
          frankly, I did not see any good analysis, the listing of "collisions" of the 21st century is so without the author, everyone knows, the statement that the conflict began during WWII is generally mistaken


          Well, Vladimir Ivanovich, I agree. Especially about WWII, because the role of the Americans in the intervention against Russia in the civil war is known for certain.
        4. +2
          8 October 2015 09: 56
          I agree. If we mean confrontation, why only WWII? And the First? That's when the global confrontation escalated to a planetary scale. And it's not a fact that he was not there before. By the way, has no one forgotten about the intervention, even if in "bad Soviet Russia"? What and why did the Americans do then? And who fed the German industry? Back in 1923 (!!!) Hitler called the notorious G. Ford the leader of the fascist movement in America. So the analysis in the article is not analysis at all. If we are talking about Syria, then let me remind the same author that the confrontation over Syria did not begin in 2013, but at least spilled out in 2011, when both Russia and China vetoed the (in fact) bombing of Syria. As for Ukraine, I also disagree with the conclusion. It is clear that the events in Syria and Ukraine are tied. With the beginning of the operation, progress was made one way or another. I think that for all the external anti-Russian rhetoric, there are agreements with the United States. Another question is for how long. It is not necessary to discount Europe, albeit outwardly impotent, but still strong enough. She is already slowly showing her teeth (take the same impending deportation of refugees). Where is China in this analysis?
          1. 0
            8 October 2015 21: 00
            China is not a player yet. and this is probably for a long time ... Although he may be looking for something for himself in the turbidity of what is happening
  7. +1
    8 October 2015 05: 51
    Well, here is another one that has become clear. This makes me happy.
  8. +2
    8 October 2015 05: 53
    The ball is with the Americans !? Actually, after our innings, they score a goal every time, so when their goalkeeper takes it out of the goal, they have no reason to be proud that they have no ball. And the fact that the author correctly noted that they will try to show themselves terrorist acts, I hope the FSB is not asleep.
  9. +6
    8 October 2015 05: 58
    It seems to be the right article. But for some reason sverbet. Why the next move for the USA? Nonsense. It seems to me that the author thinks with old stereotypes.
    Today Russia owns the ball. And the more, the stronger other states “see their light.” Probably, ISIS will become the drop that will finally give an advantage for Russia, and then, possibly, for European countries in matters of politics in Europe and Asia.
    1. +2
      8 October 2015 08: 55
      Quote: domokl
      Why the next move for the USA? Nonsense. It seems to me that the author thinks with old stereotypes.
      Today Russia owns the ball.

      Do you think we are dealing a whole series of blows now? fellow
      God forbid!
      Now Putin’s actions are surprising and - at the same time - approval.
      Such an active policy, as it is now, even in Soviet times, was not. bully
  10. +2
    8 October 2015 06: 10
    yesterday's missile salute in Syria in honor of GDP for the birthday, I hope for a long time to cool the hot heads in the EU, the USA and the world in general ...
  11. BMW
    -2
    8 October 2015 06: 16
    And I, because I do not want chaos and destruction at home, next time I will go and vote for Putin! Thanks to the Americans!

    What, the election campaign has already begun?
    And there will be explosions - I give a 100% guarantee.
    If they are satisfied with the Islamists, then with the full connivance of the FSB, if the Islamists are pressed, then the FSB itself will arrange them. The history of the Lord is repeated, remember the beginning of the 2000s. The GDP rating helped a lot. Minus, do not care. May the blind men see.
    1. +1
      8 October 2015 06: 28
      Quote: bmw
      And there will be explosions - I give a 100% guarantee.

      Already explode. Your colleagues in Syria.
      1. BMW
        -2
        8 October 2015 06: 48
        Quote: Dart2027
        Your colleagues


        Yours, which ones?
        I’m actually Orthodox. Do you write down all dissenters to terrorists or to liberoids?
        1. +1
          8 October 2015 06: 52
          Excuse me, but is there evidence of your words (about the explosions)?
          1. BMW
            -6
            8 October 2015 08: 00
            There is one proof - there were explosions.
            But the inability of the FSB to prove the involvement of terrorists and to refute allegations of involvement in the FSB, this speaks volumes, and apart from rejection does not cause anything. This leads to distrust, backed up by inaction in matters of security and protection.
            1. +1
              8 October 2015 08: 27
              Do you personally have information about the FSB's guilt?
              1. BMW
                +1
                8 October 2015 09: 19
                Do you personally have data on the guilt of terrorists?

                Instead of holding an open court hearing to refute the involvement of the FSB in preparing for the bombings, they came up with a funny story. Plus the wretched excuses of the head of the FSB. All this is very similar to the 911 investigation.
                Understatement and slurred babble, such as believe, we are not the time, cause for mistrust.
                Okay, here we will not prove anything to each other, because neither I nor you have any facts, this conversation is nothing. I mean, is it possible to trust those who are trying to lie.
                Plus brainwash: how to raise the rating?
                1. A small victorious war.
                2. Give people the image of the enemy.
                You do not have parallels: 2000-2004 and 2014-2018.
                1. +1
                  8 October 2015 11: 35
                  Quote: bmw
                  Instead of holding an open trial, deny the involvement of the FSB in preparing for the bombings

                  kindergarten webbing pants
                  Quote: bmw
                  Plus brainwash: how to raise the rating?
                  1. A small victorious war.

                  where?
                  Quote: bmw
                  2. Give people the image of the enemy.

                  Based on the logic of 41, also gave the image of the enemy?
                  Quote: bmw
                  You do not have parallels: 2000-2004 and 2014-2018.

                  no, moreover, the situations are different
                  1. BMW
                    +1
                    8 October 2015 14: 20
                    Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                    where?

                    In Syria.
                    Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                    Based on the logic of 41, also gave the image of the enemy?

                    Of course, the country was preparing at a crazy pace for war, and on two fronts. The image of the enemy unites completely different people - a feature of the human psyche.
                    Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                    no, moreover, the situations are different

                    We look
                    Chechnya Syria
                    terrorism terrorism
                    victory in the war count on victory in the war
                    approval of the US war approval of the US war will be no way out
                    terrorist attacks terrorist attacks, the probability is very high
                    economic crisis economic crisis
                    tightening of political and economic nuts in both cases (positive)
                    the destruction of state principles through aggravation of social problems (now it will increase, and at a much faster pace than 15 years ago)
                    1. +1
                      8 October 2015 14: 53
                      Quote: bmw
                      In Syria.

                      But for me the war in Syria is better than in Russia, or do you have a different opinion on this ?!
                      Quote: bmw
                      Of course, the country was preparing at a crazy pace for war, and on two fronts. The image of the enemy unites completely different people - a feature of the human psyche.

                      that is, there was no need to prepare for war ?!
                      the enemy was fictional and mythical ?!
                      Quote: bmw
                      We look
                      Chechnya Syria
                      terrorism terrorism

                      Syria is an independent state
                      Chechnya is a constituent entity of the Russian Federation, which, out of control of the state, has gone out of control due to mediocre politics and direct betrayal
                      Quote: bmw
                      victory in the war count on victory in the war

                      ?!
                      you will be surprised at in 1945, we also won and in the century before last the Cossacks were in Paris, so this is the same similar situation ?!

                      Quote: bmw
                      approval of the US war approval of the US war will be no way out
                      terrorist attacks terrorist attacks, the probability is very high

                      some kind of hash
                      Quote: bmw
                      tightening of political and economic nuts in both cases (positive)

                      you can tell what the tightening of the nuts, only specifically
                      Quote: bmw
                      the destruction of state principles through aggravation of social problems (now it will increase, and at a much faster pace than 15 years ago)

                      about the destruction of the foundations in 2000-2004 in more detail
                      1. BMW
                        0
                        8 October 2015 15: 45
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        But for me the war in Syria is better than in Russia, or do you have a different opinion on this ?!

                        War will come to us anyway. To think that we will stop them there is an illusion; they have too many patrons.
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        that is, there was no need to prepare for war ?!
                        the enemy was fictional and mythical ?!

                        I stated a fact, do not distort.
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        Syria is an independent state
                        Chechnya is a subject of the Russian Federation due to mediocre policies and direct

                        There is no difference, war is war everywhere.
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        some kind of hash

                        Chechnya
                        terrorism
                        victory in war
                        U.S. war approval
                        attacks
                        economic crisis

                        Syria
                        terrorism
                        count on victory in the war
                        US war approval will be no way out
                        threat of terrorist attacks, the probability is very high
                        economic crisis
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        you can tell what the tightening of the nuts, only specifically

                        Strengthening the vertical of power, partial circumcision of harmful economic processes, strengthening control.
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        about the destruction of the foundations in 2000-2004 in more detail

                        the growth of social inequality, the creation of a state (bureaucratic) aligarhat, the decomposition of the managerial potential of state structures, etc., only this process has been ongoing and is now gaining momentum, of course, not everything is clear, but the trend is obvious.
                      2. 0
                        9 October 2015 16: 16
                        the growth of social inequality, the creation of a state (bureaucratic) aligarhat, the decomposition of the managerial potential of state structures, etc., only this process has been ongoing and is now gaining momentum, of course, not everything is clear, but the trend is obvious.

                        From pozstol:
                        Those. Until 2000, the entire 90s of social inequality was reduced and there was no oligarchy ???! Ridiculed however wassat
                      3. BMW
                        0
                        8 October 2015 15: 51
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        But for me the war in Syria is better than in Russia, or do you have a different opinion on this ?!

                        War will come to us anyway. To think that we will stop them there is an illusion; they have too many patrons.
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        that is, there was no need to prepare for war ?!
                        the enemy was fictional and mythical ?!

                        I stated a fact, do not distort.
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        Syria is an independent state
                        Chechnya is a subject of the Russian Federation due to mediocre policies and direct

                        There is no difference, war is war everywhere.
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        some kind of hash

                        Chechnya
                        terrorism
                        victory in war
                        U.S. war approval
                        attacks
                        economic crisis

                        Syria
                        terrorism
                        count on victory in the war
                        US war approval will be no way out
                        threat of terrorist attacks, the probability is very high
                        economic crisis
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        you can tell what the tightening of the nuts, only specifically

                        Strengthening the vertical of power, partial circumcision of harmful economic processes, strengthening control.
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        about the destruction of the foundations in 2000-2004 in more detail

                        the growth of social inequality, the creation of a state (bureaucratic) aligarhat, the decomposition of the managerial potential of state structures, etc., only this process has been ongoing and is now gaining momentum, of course, not everything is clear, but the trend is obvious.
                      4. BMW
                        0
                        8 October 2015 15: 54
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        But for me the war in Syria is better than in Russia, or do you have a different opinion on this ?!

                        War will come to us anyway. To think that we will stop them there is an illusion; they have too many patrons.
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        that is, there was no need to prepare for war ?!
                        the enemy was fictional and mythical ?!

                        I stated a fact, do not distort.
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        Syria is an independent state
                        Chechnya is a subject of the Russian Federation due to mediocre policies and direct

                        There is no difference, war is war everywhere.
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        some kind of hash

                        Chechnya
                        terrorism
                        victory in war
                        U.S. war approval
                        attacks
                        economic crisis

                        Syria
                        terrorism
                        count on victory in the war
                        US war approval will be no way out
                        threat of terrorist attacks, the probability is very high
                        economic crisis
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        you can tell what the tightening of the nuts, only specifically

                        Strengthening the vertical of power, partial circumcision of harmful economic processes, strengthening control.
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        about the destruction of the foundations in 2000-2004 in more detail

                        the growth of social inequality, the creation of a state (bureaucratic) aligarhat, the decomposition of the managerial potential of state structures, etc., only this process has been ongoing and is now gaining momentum, of course, not everything is clear, but the trend is obvious.
                      5. BMW
                        0
                        8 October 2015 16: 05
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        But for me the war in Syria is better than in Russia, or do you have a different opinion on this ?!

                        War will come to us anyway. To think that we will stop them there is an illusion; they have too many patrons.
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        that is, there was no need to prepare for war ?!
                        the enemy was fictional and mythical ?!

                        I stated a fact, do not distort.
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        Syria is an independent state
                        Chechnya is a subject of the Russian Federation due to mediocre policies and direct

                        There is no difference, war is war everywhere.
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        some kind of hash

                        Chechnya
                        terrorism
                        victory in war
                        U.S. war approval
                        attacks
                        economic crisis

                        Syria
                        terrorism
                        count on victory in the war
                        US war approval will be no way out
                        threat of terrorist attacks, the probability is very high
                        economic crisis
                      6. +1
                        8 October 2015 16: 44
                        Quote: bmw
                        War will come to us anyway. To think that we will stop them there is an illusion; they have too many patrons.

                        so the more they die there the less they will come here
                        Quote: bmw
                        I stated a fact, do not distort.

                        I did not distort I continued your thought
                        Quote: bmw
                        There is no difference, war is war everywhere.

                        war it is different
                        Quote: bmw
                        Chechnya
                        terrorism
                        victory in war
                        U.S. war approval
                        attacks
                        economic crisis

                        Syria
                        terrorism
                        count on victory in the war
                        US war approval will be no way out
                        threat of terrorist attacks, the probability is very high
                        economic crisis

                        about the economic crisis in fact a Chechen company in more detail, regarding the current crisis I do not see a connection with Syria
                      7. BMW
                        0
                        8 October 2015 16: 07
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        But for me the war in Syria is better than in Russia, or do you have a different opinion on this ?!

                        War will come to us anyway. To think that we will stop them there is an illusion; they have too many patrons.
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        that is, there was no need to prepare for war ?!
                        the enemy was fictional and mythical ?!

                        I stated a fact, do not distort.
                        Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
                        Syria is an independent state
                        Chechnya is a subject of the Russian Federation due to mediocre policies and direct

                        There is no difference, war is war everywhere.
                      8. The comment was deleted.
                      9. BMW
                        0
                        8 October 2015 16: 37
                        Sorry, the phone is dull. I ask the moderators to remove unnecessary, thanks in advance.
                2. dmb
                  +2
                  8 October 2015 16: 45
                  With the preparation of the FSB bombings, you clearly went too far, if only because there was no need for this, and you are unlikely to justify it logically. If you see deliberate elimination in the actions of former Chekist soldiers, then it also seems to me that you will be wrong due to the absence of the same logic. But regarding the fooling of the working masses with a "small victorious war", victories in the long jump and an increase in the personal rating of the public, dissatisfied with their own governments, this is all to the point. And so far, it's been doing pretty well. The "working masses" as a rule read history in comics and do not know that in 1914 their ancestors also rejoiced until they felt on their own skin what a war between capitalist states was.
        2. 0
          8 October 2015 20: 00
          Quote: bmw
          I'm actually Orthodox

          This is not a panacea.
          Quote: bmw
          To terrorists you write down all dissenters or in liberoids

          It was the liberoids who shouted that it was not the bandits who were blowing it up, but the KGB.
    2. 0
      8 October 2015 21: 05
      explosions may be but at the same time may not be. Why should the FSB blow up houses or buses with its own citizens if it is easier to raise a rating with a rocket bomb in Kiev, for example.
  12. +5
    8 October 2015 06: 19
    "In general, the ball in this terrible game is now on the side of the United States, and we can only wait, trying to predict and prepare the meeting where it will fly!"

    I do not think that on the side of the United States. IMHO, they have not yet come to their senses after yesterday’s congratulation of the GDP of the Caspian flotilla. And for some time turnips will scratch while spewing out different nonsense in the media.

    "And I, since I do not want chaos and destruction at home, next time I will go and vote for Putin! Thanks to the Americans!"

    Well, at least kill, but I do not see an alternative to Putin, except perhaps Shoigu.
    1. +1
      8 October 2015 21: 17
      but at the sunset of Yeltsin you hardly heard about Putin. Here I am with a comrade mumbling about the economy and, in general, the situation with our economy. The man tells interesting things. In addition to Nabibullina and all sorts of secular uluyukaevs and Dimon with everyone else, there are many people in the country who really understand the situation and these people work and do everything so that everything works for us and how it develops. They pull the strap of problems. So probably one of them may be a candidate. In general, I have a candidate in my head, but for now I will be silent lol
  13. 0
    8 October 2015 06: 25
    The origins of mutual distrust, rivalry and hostility are rooted in the Second World War.
    already crap
  14. +2
    8 October 2015 06: 31
    And that it is necessary to "lie down" under the United States and prepare for extinction, as in Ukraine ?! The Americans will gradually but surely transform the population of the occupied countries into Indians, i.e. destroy it. In America, genocide is carried out with jewelry. You can ask the former mayor of New York, who in the late 1970s introduced a system of sterilization of a part of the population in Harlem, when for money unfortunate people were offered not to have offspring. Surely they are also doing it now in Ukraine with the Russians. For example, I do not want to share the fate of the inhabitants of Ukraine. There, fascism reigns supreme, when the fittest survives (in Ukrainian reality, the arrogant), so that the note-taking "nationalist speakers" from Ukraine, who regularly appear on our TV screens, and whose mere sight is disgusting, do not speak there. This is not how we were raised. Neither fascism nor the Americans will pass !!!
  15. +3
    8 October 2015 06: 33
    The State Department is gaining panic ... otherwise, how to understand Kirby’s phrase: "The military operation against IS will continue and will not weaken. But what is important is that a transfer of power from Assad should take place in Russia."

    Kirby responded to the surprised remarks of journalists with a question: "What did I say?"
    see http://www.unian.net/world/1146192-v-gosdepe-ssha-pereputali-rossiyu-i-siriyu
    -govorya-o-neobhodimosti-smenyi-vlasti.html
  16. +1
    8 October 2015 06: 53
    And one more important point. Entering the fight against ISIS has increased the risk of terrorist attacks against residents of Russia. This idea will be intensely exaggerated in order to create an atmosphere of fear and insecurity within the country.
    We were already terrorized and blown up in 90. If you really choose, it is better to be undermined in a modern strong Russia, not ashamed and not scared. Than in that loose loose flabby from 90's, under the drunken mumble of Yeltsin.

    Or is it such a hint in the article - renounce modern Russia and they will not undermine you? Well, no, thanks, we have already passed this rake.
  17. +1
    8 October 2015 07: 05
    Which side of the ball is the question. There are many balls and all at the same time in the game. And the conclusion is right - for PUTIN.
  18. 0
    8 October 2015 07: 06
    Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
    Quote: Human-DV
    global confrontation between two superpowers

    in no time, two civilizations of European and Eurasian

    I will support you Vladimir! This is a confrontation between two civilizations !!!
    1. +1
      8 October 2015 14: 54
      the worst thing is that all this is endless
  19. +4
    8 October 2015 07: 18
    She worked in the civil service when Putin became president. The development strategy dramatically and significantly changed immediately after the new year (that's how they got to work after the holiday). But there was such an impression, it turned out that all the bureaucratic herd (especially the leadership) deliberately sabotaged or tried to snatch for the last - everything was done on the ground exactly the opposite. There was an impression that he was working in the whole country (Putin alone just works). Finally, part of the country saw him, and even seems to understand.
  20. +1
    8 October 2015 07: 35
    It's just life. The strongest survives. Through the efforts of our ancestors, we got a huge and rich country. The object of envy of neighbors and neighbors, and not so much. And, fortunately, our ancestors also left us a shield with a sword, as well as not a timid character. Yes, and there are brains. So let's see. Not all striped-eared "cottage cheese, when the muzzle on the threshold."
  21. 0
    8 October 2015 07: 42
    here the author is right, if you want stability, you’ll go to vote for such a president
  22. +1
    8 October 2015 07: 45
    It blows like that in amateurish, but from the heart.
  23. +1
    8 October 2015 07: 59
    I wish I brought order to my country! Then let him be a king for life
  24. 0
    8 October 2015 08: 04
    Probably, you should not try to get to the bottom of the answer - who started and who is to blame.

    no. This is the most important thing at all times. Otherwise, you can easily justify the killer and condemn the victim.
  25. +3
    8 October 2015 08: 04
    It depends on what you take as a reference point. The first color revolution is the destruction of the USSR. I'm tired of the dominance of corruption, the effective destruction of medicine and education, the ongoing Americanization of the country. What has Putin done for the Russians? N AND C E G O! Therefore, I’ll go to vote, but not for Putin.
    1. 0
      8 October 2015 09: 26
      Quote: Gardamir
      What has Putin done for the Russians? N AND C E G O!

      Everything was done by Gorby and EBN. Vote for their last. You will be appreciated and promised ...
      1. -1
        8 October 2015 10: 22
        Everything was done by Gorby and EBN. Vote for their last
        So you are calling to vote for Putin? The last of Yeltsin?
    2. +1
      8 October 2015 09: 33
      He finished the war in Chechnya. Stopped free pumping of oil and gas (and not only) by foreign companies (abolition of the production sharing law). Because of what the price of these resources has risen, which has benefited Russia and its citizens. Remember the 90s, in what year people lived then. Remember the moment with Putin, Deripaska and the pen, yes, the same plant that was saved = jobs, so this was not the only plant that Putin saved from closing due to "low profitability". Kicked Berezovsky out, returning most of his assets to the state (people). I planted the thief Khodorkovsky, who wanted to sell Yukos to foreigners. Despite the fact that many receive their salaries in "envelopes", so that these ridiculous 13% of income tax is not paid (ask how much% of the salary goes to taxes in Germany), the standard of living is compared to the 90s, the beginning of the 2000s and now it can not but rejoice, but just look around if you live in Russia and remember what happened in the 90s. And where does the money for improving people's lives come from, if people do not want to pay taxes to the state, and unlike the USSR, the fat from production goes not to the budget, but to the owner's pocket?

      If you don’t see what Putin did for the Russians, then you haven’t been to Russia for a very long time or you are blind.
      1. 0
        8 October 2015 11: 12
        If you don’t see what Putin did for the Russians,
        that means he did nothing. People believed Putin, and they were killed in the Donbass, and yet he said, let him just try to shoot at the Russians. Tried and continued. And his words use sanctions; making money is just ridiculous. That is, he, as the head of the country, cannot organize a normal life for citizens? And the WTO and Juvenile Justice who came under Putin. Children continue to be selected from Russian families and sold abroad. This is Putin's market economy. The effective destruction of medicine and education has intensified in recent years. In culture, only pop is encouraged. State money contains TNT. This Putin believes that during the years of the USSR nothing good was done, but he himself does not want to be responsible for everything bad now.
        1. 0
          8 October 2015 14: 25
          Quote: Gardamir
          That is, he, as the head of the country, cannot organize a normal life for citizens?

          Kindergarten .. the leader of the country must provide a "normal life" for the citizen of Gardamir

          - and citizen Gardamir himself did not try to "organize" a "normal life" for himself?
          - But did one of the citizens delegate the right to speak to citizen Gardamir?

          My doubts on both points ..

          Quote: Gardamir
          WTO and Juvenile Justice come under Putin

          - but honestly - for you personally - has something changed with the "arrival of the WTO"? For me, somehow not ..
          - juvenile justice in the Russian Federation is not and never will be. Stop lying already ..

          Quote: Gardamir
          Children continue to be selected from Russian families and sold abroad

          Facts - in the studio .. or stop lying ..

          Quote: Gardamir
          This is Putin’s market economy

          Yes, yes, yes .. since 1991 - everything is according to Putin .. and the chapel - Putin also collapsed laughing

          Quote: Gardamir
          Public money contains TNT

          Is Gazprom-Media "state money"? I congratulate you once again lying ..

          Quote: Gardamir
          This Putin believes that nothing good was done during the years of the USSR

          A reference to Putin's statement that he "thinks so" ..

          Lying like a gray gelding .. and also "marshal" negative
          1. +1
            8 October 2015 15: 18
            the leader of the country must ensure a "normal life" for the citizen of Gardamir

            - and citizen Gardamir himself did not try to "organize" a "normal life" for himself?
            - But did one of the citizens delegate the right to speak to citizen Gardamir?
            you are too lazy to argue with argument, for the sake of pluses or something trying?
            And there are a lot of links, at least just review the speech at the UN, many pretended. that they didn’t hear how the head of the country mixed his own country with mud. No chapter ever spit in the history of his country.
            Lying like a gray gelding .. and also "marshal"
            a couple more blank notes and you will draw an asterisk.
            1. -1
              8 October 2015 17: 51
              Quote: Gardamir
              you are too lazy to argue with reason

              Nah .. not me, but it seems to you ..

              Of all your accusations against Putin, as I understand it, only

              Quote: Gardamir
              the head of the country, mixed his own country with mud

              Well, at least not "juvenile justice" or "selling children abroad," already bread ..

              Quote: Gardamir
              And there will be a lot of links

              And where? I look forward to .. wink

              Quote: Gardamir
              at least just review the speech at the UN ...

              ... and try to guess what exactly in it did not please you? belay

              Well you fucking give (C)
              1. +1
                8 October 2015 18: 24
                and try to guess what exactly in it did not please you

                at least one of the heads of state spoke in this vein about the past of his country
                1. 0
                  8 October 2015 18: 39
                  Quote: Gardamir
                  at least one of the heads of state spoke in this vein about the past of his country

                  We all should not forget the experience of the past. For example, we also remember examples from the history of the Soviet Union. The export of social experiments, attempts to spur change in certain countries, based on their ideological principles, often led to tragic consequences, led not to progress, but to degradation.

                  However it seems no one learns from the mistakes of others, but only repeats them and the export of revolutions, now the so-called "democratic", continues

                  Well, nothing new, unknown has been said. Could you give examples of when the Union "got" into obviously losing "enterprises"? Countries allegedly "socialist" that the Union fed and pumped up weapons?

                  Why it was said is highlighted in red. If Putin hadn’t said this, others would have reminded him of this., do not doubt..

                  Total: unconvincing. Still have examples?
        2. +1
          8 October 2015 14: 57
          Quote: Gardamir
          People believed Putin, and they were killed in the Donbass

          minus only for this phrase
          I don’t know who believed something to anyone but I will never forget an interview with a couple in Donetsk when the fighting was already in full swing, these (two guys 19-23) drank a juicy drink in the summer cafe and told how they voted for separation, but who should fight for freedom something else
          1. +1
            8 October 2015 15: 12
            minus only for this phrase

          2. -1
            8 October 2015 15: 21
            minus only for this phrase

      2. +2
        8 October 2015 16: 17
        Quote: From Germany
        The war in Chechnya endedTrue, due to the infusion of non-feeble budgetary funds, against the background of continuing active terrorist activity (which, lo and behold, is aimed at representatives of state power, and not at ordinary citizens, as in the rest of the Russian Federation), having previously failed the invasion of Dagestan.

        He stopped free pumping of oil and gas (and not only) by foreign companies (repeal of the law on the division of production), the truth is only in the fantasies of easily divorced suckers and scribbles of Kremlin bots: in reality, there has never been any free pumping out, the PSA law is still in effect, and the price of energy has been growing since the 99th year.

        Remember the moment with Putin, Deripaska and the pen ... - and you will get foreign "bread" at the exit, a spectacle with a local spill handle, and the absence of real consequences for Deripaska for his tricks that fall under the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (urya-urya!)

        He wiped out Berezovsky, returning most of his assets to the state (people) - "vyturil" without real consequences for the birch, after which the number of dollar billionaires increased from 8 in 2001 (in 2000 there were none), to 131 in 2013 (the growth rate of the number of billionaires was 2 times higher than the GDP growth rate)

        Planted a thief-Khodorkovsky who wanted to sell Yukos to foreigners, but was very afraid that he would not be able to do this because of Putin, who offered preferential PSAs to foreigners (why buy Yukos if you can organize a new company on preferential terms?). As a result, in order to block this decision, Hodor climbed into power, for which he sat down.
        And 11 years after the landing of the hodor through the efforts of Putin, the Russian Federation got involved in a voluntary (and therefore a court decision is obligatory for execution) trial, as a result of which it got 50 lard.

        many are paid in "envelopes", so that this ridiculous 13%
        Many, risking an old age in poverty, are forced to get paid in envelopes so as not to fly out of work. And the tax scale, supposedly flat, but actually regressive, is nothing more than a legal evasion of taxation for the rich, with the transfer of the tax burden on the shoulders of the poor.

        the standard of living compared to the 90s, the beginning of the 2000s and now can not but rejoice
        But only 20% of the population - the rest have nothing to enjoy.

        unlike the USSR, the fat from production does not go to the budget, but to the owner’s pocket?
        And how does our great leader allow such a thing ?!

        either you have not been to Russia for a very long time or you are blind
        And what is the name of the one who persecutes the repeal of the current law, and the other, like that, blizzard - a fool, or a scoundrel? smile
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +1
      8 October 2015 14: 55
      Quote: Gardamir
      What has Putin done for the Russians?

      and whom do you personally consider RUSSIAN? !!!
  26. +2
    8 October 2015 08: 26
    Neither plus nor minus did not set this bold one either an enthusiast or a panic-maker. There is no ball in the hands of the United States, in their hands they have potatoes from a bonfire that they lit. And they can’t put out the fire, their hands are busy, and it’s a pity to throw out potatoes until they figure out what to do, the other will eat the stew and go on. And the incendiaries do not have many options: either matches end or ultimately set themselves on fire.
  27. +3
    8 October 2015 09: 07
    Probably, you should not try to get to the bottom of the answer - who started and who is to blame. The origins of mutual distrust, rivalry and hostility are rooted in the Second World War.

    The author was mistaken. The sources of distrust are much earlier. It's all about our different understanding of the security principle. For Russians, “security” is a non-threatening condition. For the Anglo-Saxons, this is a set of measures so that the threat does not appear in the future. British and American politics are built on identifying the most powerful power in Eurasia and disaggregating its resources in advance. Recall the naval strategy of Great Britain in the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century. Grand Fleet should be more powerful than the combined fleets of three other countries following Great Britain in the report on the number of ships. The United States literally took this strategy. Under such conditions, it is impossible to agree with the Anglo-Saxons.
  28. +1
    8 October 2015 10: 00
    Sorry EBN died. Now I would bask in the rays of "people's love", beast. I would have poisoned myself.
    It’s good that the genus of this animal has died out.
  29. +2
    8 October 2015 10: 09
    next time I’ll go and vote for Putin! Thanks to the Americans!

    Wait a short time, soon another chance to introduce myself to vote.

    Is it not enough, except thanks to the adversary, to vote for our clear sun?

    And if the Americans hadn’t suggested who the author would have voted for, if they had found whom to vote for?
  30. +3
    8 October 2015 10: 28
    next time I’ll go and vote for Putin! Thanks to the Americans!

    How resolutely, I’ll go and vote, but earlier, it means that the author did not go and did not vote as necessary. I made a mistake.

    But now, when the struggle of empires has begun, they will have to vote, and it will not be long to wait, soon another case will be introduced to correct the mistakes of previous votes.

    Is it not enough, except thanks to the adversary, to vote for our clear sun?

    And if the Americans hadn’t suggested who the author would have voted for, if they had found whom to vote for?

    But doesn’t it seem to the author that the Russian people still need something other than a war of empires?

    For example, a working economy, excellent education, modern medicine, good nutrition, longer life expectancy, decent retirement, fair courts, a real fight against corruption, and much more, which makes the country great.

    Does our leader seriously deal with these issues, and what has the country received in this sense, or after the war of empires that he leads, all this is nothing?

    Less enthusiasm for the wars of empires, more attention and good results in internal affairs, that’s what the country needs.

    Russia, take an example from China!
  31. +1
    8 October 2015 10: 42
    Quote: Gardamir
    So you are calling to vote for Putin? The last of Yeltsin?


    the last is not the one who came to power after, but the one who pursues a policy similar to the former government.
    Putin is not a follower of Yeltsin’s policies, but is the next president after him with his personal policies and views.
    1. 0
      8 October 2015 16: 34
      Quote: lopvlad
      the last one is not the one who came to power after and the one who pursues a policy similar to the former government
      Yeltsin’s policy: privatization, integration with the West, protection of the interests of big capital, in the long term - reduction and monetization of social guarantees.
      Putin's policy: privatization, integration with the West, protection of the interests of big capital, reduction and monetization of social guarantees.

      And what is the difference?

      Putin is not a follower of Yeltsin’s policies, but is the next president after him with his personal policies and views.
      Putin:

      "Boris Nikolayevich Yeltsin, together with the new Russia, went through the path of the most difficult, but necessary transformations. He headed the process of cardinal changes that brought Russia out of the impasse. Russia received a rebirth. It became a civilized open state, and the role of the first president in the formation of this state is enormous.
      It was at this time that Russia was born open and thinking about people, democratic institutions were formed, the Constitution of Russia was adopted, which proclaimed human rights and freedom as the highest value. "

      http://top.rbc.ru/society/01/02/2011/536637.shtml
  32. +1
    8 October 2015 11: 03
    Quote: Gardamir
    What has Putin done for the Russians? N AND C E G O!


    Is the bloodless return of Crimea to Russia small or is it not an achievement but a grief for you?
    1. 0
      8 October 2015 12: 46
      that the bloodless return of Crimea to Russia is not enough
      give your teacher’s phone number in kindergarten, I’ll ask you not to give you a computer again.
  33. -2
    8 October 2015 11: 19
    their personal policies and views.
    As before, we pay taxes to America (we list it in the Fed), and the fact that he does not hide his hatred of the USSR is very unpleasant.
  34. 0
    8 October 2015 12: 14
    And I, because I do not want chaos and destruction at home, next time I will go and vote for Putin! Thanks to the Americans!

    Well said !!! I completely agree!!!!!!!
  35. +2
    8 October 2015 12: 24
    [quote = Guardamir] [quote]If you do not see what Putin did for the Russians, [/ quote] then it means he did nothing.

    Dear Gardamir, I am embarrassed to ask how old are you? You lived in the era of the 90s, when there was nothing on the shelves of shops, there was nothing to eat except gray pasta and humanitarian aid, there was nothing to dress yourself and your family? Now those who work have the opportunity to live, and not die quietly, to buy apartments, cars, at least on credit. The country has become different, the roads we complain about have become much better, popcorn, chewing gum and Pepsi-cola were not familiar to me words, I never saw them in my eyes as a child. The Internet, computers, mobile communications have become available not only to skinheads in raspberry-colored jackets, but even to pensioners. Do not entertain yourself with the idea that education and health care were at the highest level. In Moscow, houses were blown up with sleeping residents, Russia was on the verge of collapse and destruction as a single state. All this is in the past, the country experienced another turning point in history, we survived, but the West and the USA do not like it, so they created another crisis to show us their place. Choose ..... fool
    1. 0
      8 October 2015 15: 33
      , too shy to ask
      Do not be shy. I remember children's 60s, it was EVERYTHING, in the 70s it’s not like that anymore, but TVs, motorcycles, tape recorders, the beginning of the 80s, are also pretty. But everyone forgets, then we were proud of our country, and the army, and the Moscow Olympics. And now everyone is proud, there is no country, they are proud of Putin, sad.
      Are you happy with loans? Collectors are on their way to you. Forgive me from the northern part of Russia and I don’t like corn or popcorn, Pepsi-Cola drank Soviet in the 80s, and this one is harmful to health. He also used computers in the 80s and if the USSR had not been destroyed, they would still use Soviet computers. Houses were blown up during Putin’s reign, but you have already forgotten a lot.
  36. +1
    8 October 2015 14: 10
    I support the fact that Putin defends Russia's interests in the international arena is very impressive. But to vote for Putin is another question - we’ll see what happens with the Donbass and whether the circus will continue like a casino prosecutor’s office, Serdyukov-Vasilyevschina (like 8 years probation and parole), what will happen to the governors already under arrest, etc. Justice must be at home first, isn't it?
  37. 0
    8 October 2015 15: 43
    Where did my comments go?
  38. BMW
    0
    8 October 2015 15: 56
    Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
    But for me the war in Syria is better than in Russia, or do you have a different opinion on this ?!

    War will come to us anyway. To think that we will stop them there is an illusion; they have too many patrons.
    Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
    that is, there was no need to prepare for war ?!
    the enemy was fictional and mythical ?!

    I stated a fact, do not distort.
    Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
    Syria is an independent state
    Chechnya is a subject of the Russian Federation due to mediocre policies and direct

    There is no difference, war is war everywhere.
    Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
    some kind of hash

    Chechnya
    terrorism
    victory in war
    U.S. war approval
    attacks
    economic crisis

    Syria
    terrorism
    count on victory in the war
    US war approval will be no way out
    threat of terrorist attacks, the probability is very high
    economic crisis
    Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
    you can tell what the tightening of the nuts, only specifically

    Strengthening the vertical of power, partial circumcision of harmful economic processes, strengthening control.
    Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
    about the destruction of the foundations in 2000-2004 in more detail

    the growth of social inequality, the creation of a state (bureaucratic) aligarhat, the decomposition of the managerial potential of state structures, etc., only this process has been ongoing and is now gaining momentum, of course, not everything is clear, but the trend is obvious.
    1. 0
      8 October 2015 16: 49
      Quote: bmw
      War will come to us anyway. To think that we will stop them there is an illusion; they have too many patrons.

      so the more they die there the less they will come here
      Quote: bmw
      I stated a fact, do not distort.

      I did not distort I continued your thought
      Quote: bmw
      There is no difference, war is war everywhere.

      war it is different
      Quote: bmw
      Chechnya
      terrorism
      victory in war
      U.S. war approval
      attacks
      economic crisis

      Syria
      terrorism
      count on victory in the war
      US war approval will be no way out
      threat of terrorist attacks, the probability is very high
      economic crisis

      about the economic crisis in fact a Chechen company in more detail, regarding the current crisis I do not see a connection with Syria
      Quote: bmw
      Strengthening the vertical of power, partial circumcision of harmful economic processes, strengthening control.

      Is it called a nut tightening ?!
      Quote: bmw
      the growth of social inequality, the creation of a state (bureaucratic) aligarhat, the decomposition of the managerial potential of state structures, etc., only this process has been ongoing and is now gaining momentum, of course, not everything is clear, but the trend is obvious.

      it's hard to argue about the stratification itself and not about the root causes
  39. +2
    8 October 2015 16: 41
    Once again. Already here and now, as a preventative measure.

    To all the mongrels and lackeys of the US State Department, listen to my team.

    In the fifth column become. Be equal! .... Attention! ....

    To win against a sharpie is possible only if you yourself are a sharpie, but of higher qualification. The qualifications of the United States - United Shulers of America are unparalleled on planet Earth.

    It’s free! Go out! ... and comprehend what they heard.

    Regards lvi1.

    PS Everyone decides who he should be and with what authority to leave this world, but before you get into operation clean your boots.

    PPS A, this is one of the lucky Shulers of the USA (United Shulers of America). This is for those who have forgotten what international cheaters look like.
  40. +1
    8 October 2015 16: 48
    And I, because I do not want chaos and destruction at home, the next time I go and vote for Putin!
    4 years have passed, but the training manual has not changed ...
    1. -2
      8 October 2015 19: 43
      Quote: Uncle Joe
      4 years have passed, but the training manual has not changed

      Self-critical, what to say .. wink
  41. -2
    8 October 2015 19: 30
    And I’ll also run to vote for Putin! And millions more Chinese who occupy Siberia and the Far East. Everyone will be for Putin!

    “At the end of 2014, the State Duma adopted and signed by President Putin Federal Law No. 473-FZ“ On Priority Development Areas. ”This law:
    - Allows you to rent and operate by citizens of another country 60% of the territories of the Russian Federation for up to 70 years with the right to extend.
    - Allows to fully or partially repeal the current laws of the Russian Federation in most of Russia
    - Allows foreigners the extraction and export of minerals, hydrocarbons and other minerals, logging, fishing, shooting animals - in any quantity, without damages
    - Allows foreigners to elect or be elected to legislative (representative) bodies of local self-government.
    - Allows the use of the labor code of the Russian Federation by foreigners without taking into account quotas and restrictions
    - Allows foreigners to ignore parts of the border of the Russian Federation
    - Allows the use by foreigners of part of the legislation of the Russian Federation exempting them from mandatory payments and federal taxes
    - Allows you to compensate by means of the federal budget for taxes not paid by foreigners
    - Allows the eviction of indigenous people, citizens of the Russian Federation
    - Allows you to seize any movable and immovable property from the population of the Russian Federation, ignoring property rights "
    1. +1
      8 October 2015 19: 42
      Quote: Grave without Cross
      "At the end of 2014, the State Duma adopted and signed by President Putin Federal Law No. 473-FZ" On Priority Development Areas "

      The text is here: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_172962/

      Quote: Grave without Cross
      Allows you to rent and operate by citizens of another country 60% of the territories of the Russian Federation for up to 70 years with the right to extend

      What is 60%? Where is it in the law?

      Quote: Grave without Cross
      Allows to fully or partially repeal the current laws of the Russian Federation in most of Russia

      Where is it in the Law? Who will "cancel" - really foreigners?

      Quote: Grave without Cross
      Allows foreigners the extraction and export of minerals, hydrocarbons and other minerals, logging, fishing, shooting animals - in any quantity, without damages

      Lies. Or - a link to paragraph (s) of the Law, please.

      Quote: Grave without Cross
      Allows foreigners to elect or be elected to legislative (representative) bodies of local self-government

      Yah??? belay

      Quote: Grave without Cross
      Allows foreigners to ignore parts of the border of the Russian Federation

      What is it like??? belay

      Quote: Grave without Cross
      Allows you to seize any movable and immovable property from the population of the Russian Federation, ignoring property rights

      Some chaos .. Where, whip, is it in the Law ??

      Quote: Grave without Cross
      And I’ll also run to vote for Putin! And millions more Chinese who occupy Siberia and the Far East. Everyone will be for Putin!

      And the Chinese will have citizenship of the Russian Federation? Read the law on elections ..

      Kar-roche: you're all lying. And extremely lightweight.. Grave .. without brains fool
      1. -1
        8 October 2015 20: 03
        Quote: Cat Man Null
        you're all lying. And extremely lightweight

        Maybe before writing any nonsense, learn the Russian language? And wake up talented the guy. wink
        Information taken from the site "God is with us Moscow III Rome"
        There is such a patriotic, Orthodox site. All claims to them ... and to your beloved Chinese ... and, I beg you, learn Russian!
        1. 0
          8 October 2015 20: 16
          Quote: Grave without Cross
          Information taken from the site "God with us Moscow III Rome". There is such a patriotic, Orthodox site. All claims against them ...

          You placed it on your behalf here. Without a link to the site. That is why the questions are for you.

          The site, by the way .. yellowish, in my opinion. And about No. 473-FZ “On Territories of Rapid Development” - frank lies, calculated for suckers Yes

          Quote: Grave without Cross
          to your beloved Chinese ...

          In the coffin I saw them. In white slippers. I worked with them for almost three years, I don’t want to.

          Something like that..
    2. 0
      8 October 2015 20: 04
      Quote: Grave without Cross
      - Allows you to rent and operate by citizens of another country 60% of the territories of the Russian Federation for up to 70 years with the right to extend.

      you when repost from another site do even in quotes take
      Quote: Grave without Cross
      Allows foreigners to elect or be elected to legislative (representative) bodies of local self-government

      and you can confirm the postulates with quotes from the law
    3. 0
      8 October 2015 20: 08
      You are healthy?
    4. +1
      8 October 2015 21: 33
      can the text of the document? And then you’ll read such interpreters, then you will gather your thoughts, you will find a source and a pancake ... it turned out I listened to the idiot
      1. 0
        8 October 2015 21: 45
        Quote: AwaZ
        can the text of the document

        The text is here: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_172962/

        Do not work too hard, there is no such thing there. The author of this "local turmoil" has already merged, hike.

        He cannot say anything in the case, and cannot admit that he screwed up. It’s hard for him now, my sympathy ..
  42. -3
    8 October 2015 20: 22
    Here is the opinion of the expert of the former Minister of Russia, if I am not mistaken in the press of Boris Mironov about the law No. 473-FZ.
    In my opinion everything is chewed up here. Even my respected opponent will figure it out. winked
    1. 0
      8 October 2015 20: 42
      Quote: Grave without Cross
      Here is the opinion of an expert of the former Minister of Russia, if I am not mistaken according to the press of Boris Mironov about Law No. 473-FZ

      You are mistaken. IMHO you generally do this often wink

      Quote: Wiki
      Boris Sergeevich Mironov ... In 1993-1994 - Chairman of the Press Committee of the Russian Federation. In 2002-2003, he was co-chairman of the National Sovereign Party of Russia. Adheres to nationalist views. Member of the Union of Writers of Russia. A number of Mironov's publications recognized by the court as extremist

      Note Opposition, Th ..

      Quote: Grave without Cross
      Even my respected opponent will figure it out

      Nope ..

      Quote: A.S. Griboyedov, "Woe from Wit"
      I'm not stupid reader,
      And forest - exemplary

      If you want to challenge something - read the Law, look for confirmation in it of the nonsense that you posted there above, provide links to articles of the Law.

      A talking head, and with a tarnished reputation, is not an argument even once.

      Somehow Yes
      1. 0
        8 October 2015 20: 54
        Quote: Cat Man Null
        Boris Sergeevich Mironov ... In 1993-1994 - Chairman of the Press Committee of the Russian Federation.

        At least he was, my incredulous friend. And you better not remind about the trial after Vasilyeva with Serdyukov. He is the most humane in the world in relation to the enemies of the fatherland.
        1. 0
          8 October 2015 21: 05
          Quote: Grave without Cross
          about the trial after Vasilyeva with Serdyukov you better not remind. He is the most humane in the world in relation to the enemies of the fatherland

          Do not move off topic.. in fact, according to the Law No. 473-FZ "On the territories of advanced social and economic development in the Russian Federation" - is there anything to say?

          Well, besides the lies that you dragged from somewhere? wink
          1. -2
            8 October 2015 22: 08
            Yes, you can’t calm down. Alright, enjoy Dorenko, he's not an extremist. And I went to sleep.
            1. +1
              8 October 2015 23: 16
              Quote: Grave without Cross
              enjoy Dorenko

              Your persistence, yes for peaceful purposes laughing

              He already said:

              If you want to challenge something - read the Law, look for it confirmation of the nonsense that you posted there above, provide links to articles of the Law.

              And in no other way. Keep the talking heads for yourself.

              Quote: Grave without Cross
              I went to sleep

              So that you have a Chinese dream .. love
    2. 0
      8 October 2015 22: 26
      can you finish the reposts and confirm your theses with links from the law you are referring to? !!
  43. +3
    8 October 2015 21: 20
    The belated toasts to GDP look unconvincing. Without the nuclear triad, only a shadow of the Chinese monster would remain from the Russian Empire. The vertical of effective power in the presence of eternally bad boyars ends with the threshold of the GDP cabinet. Foreign policy is full of endless concessions, debt write-offs and capricious purchased allies. The very coming to power of "the Kremlin Bonaparte" is more like saving the business of the oligarchs from the Great Troubles and amerov's competitors. There was a holiday of Russian pride - Crimea ... But after April 2014, only a continuous "naibulism" in the economy and the betrayal of the Russians of Donbass ...
    1. +2
      8 October 2015 21: 33
      Quote: samarin1969
      samarin1969

      Great koment! Everything to the point and to the point! +100500 good
    2. -2
      8 October 2015 22: 24
      Quote: samarin1969
      The very coming to power of "the Kremlin Bonaparte" is more like ...
      But after April 2014 only continuous "naibulism" in the economy and the betrayal of the Russians of Donbass ...

  44. 0
    9 October 2015 09: 39
    The battle of two empires?
    According to the Theoretical History of Grigory Kvasha, this is a confrontation between the Empire (Russia) and the Totalitarian Double (USA). The shadow always seeks to take the place of the owner, but in the historical perspective it always loses. The denouement, according to Kvasha, is quite close to 2025. After this period, Russia will switch from the Imperial to the Western cycle, and the need for doubles will disappear: China will be the second double, but before that we will have to fight.
    The new empire will be Iran, the old was Great Britain.
    USA, Germany, France, Japan were never Empires, but only Shadows.
  45. 0
    10 October 2015 00: 17
    Quote: bmw
    The history of the gentleman is repeated, remember the beginning of the 2000s. The GDP rating helped a lot. Minus, do not care. May the blind men see

    You have the facts, and even then it was clear to me that this was inflated by our libers and their parties like "apple"!
    When VVP went into the second term of the presidency, how spat their community, as soon as it was not called names. Even my classmate said that it was the GDP that brought the mafia and bandits to power, forgetting that they came to power during the period of the "democrat" EBNa. I tried to convince this friend to look at the dynamics of what and how the GDP and the team are doing, but he wanted everything at once! So the current liberals run into short-term problems without seeing the direction of movement and ways of keeping such a colossus as Russia afloat! Yes, there are problems within the country and they will lead to a change in economic management - the adherents of the idea of ​​liberal capitalism will be replaced by the ideas of building socialism.
    By the way, the idea of ​​liberal capitalism is an analogue of Shiny glass beads, for which the Spaniards exchanged gold items from the natives of America. Such a substitution of concepts was carried out by the current "partners", together with the rotten and sold-out top of the CPSU. They presented their ineptitude and greed as a flaw in the theory of socialism, forgetting what influence it had on the development of all countries, and in hi first of all capitalist!
  46. +2
    10 October 2015 01: 16
    "And I, since I do not want chaos and destruction at home, next time I will go and vote for Putin! Thanks to the Americans!"

    The logic of the author of the article is certainly not cunning, I would even say it looks like a panic call "Do as I do." I also want to inform this citizen so that he does not worry and calm down, because there is plenty of chaos and destruction in our country anyway, however for me personally, this is not a reason to vote for Putin.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"