Russian UAVs will be equipped with unique radio electronics

28
Russian Drones will be equipped with unique on-board radio electronic equipment (avionics), which allows them to exchange information with the "ground" without an intermediary - a ground control center, transmits RIA News report of the Deputy General Director of the United Instrument Making Corporation (DIC) Sergey Sokolov.



According to Sokolov, the work on the creation of avionics is completed. “The military-industrial complex completed work on the avionics created in the spirit of the concept of“ network-centric wars ”. This advanced complex is the basis for building various reconnaissance unmanned aerial vehicles that can be integrated into modern automated battle control systems. ”

He noted that the equipment is universal and "can be installed on any type of drone, including these developments are being introduced into the medium reconnaissance short-range drone Corsair developed by the military-industrial complex, which is currently undergoing flight tests."

Sokolov explained that “airborne avionics include a strapdown form inertial navigation system (SINS), an onboard information recorder and a communications complex based on software-defined radio technology”.

According to him, “the ability to exchange information between the“ land ”and the drone without an intermediary allows command posts and each combat unit in the battle management system to see the data of unmanned reconnaissance online and act more quickly.”

As the agency explained, “network-centric war is a military doctrine focused on increasing combat capabilities in modern wars by achieving infocommunication superiority, combining combatants into a single network, is part of a hybrid war”.
  • http://defendingrussia.ru/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    5 October 2015 18: 01
    Our industry has always been famous for its developments ... it's time to return to them ... in this sense, the import substitution campaign is on time. The main thing is to revive the production of our own elemental base under the needs of domestic radio electronics.
    1. +2
      5 October 2015 19: 52
      Quote: silberwolf88
      Our industry has always been famous for its developments ... it's time to return to them ... in this sense, the import substitution campaign is on time. The main thing is to revive the production of our own elemental base under the needs of domestic radio electronics.

      This has been talked about for years and years ...
      1. +3
        5 October 2015 21: 32
        I agree. Only today I talked with a robotics teacher. He really is 3 years as a pension. But he said that the students simply did not care about science. And those who are interested are dumped to the west. So honor and praise to those who at least somehow move us forward.
  2. +8
    5 October 2015 18: 05
    The military-industrial complex is gaining momentum.
    Tremble villains.
    Our engineers have always been strong, but now they remain in our country, which means they are still ahead ....
  3. +3
    5 October 2015 18: 13
    Given the latest developments, much-needed acquisitions.
    1. +8
      5 October 2015 18: 24
      The most advanced UAVs are Americans and Israelis ... well, the Americans would clearly refuse us, but as if Israel would react to their use in Syria, in the end they are not shock. In such cases they say ... what would they say Professor? But you minus him so much that he simply will not answer.
      1. -1
        5 October 2015 19: 51
        Quote: katalonec2014
        The most advanced UAVs are Americans and Israelis ... well, the Americans would clearly refuse us, but as if Israel would react to their use in Syria, in the end they are not shock. In such cases they say ... what would they say Professor? But you minus him so much that he simply will not answer.


        Not us, this paid bots.
        1. +2
          6 October 2015 01: 00
          Quote: Civil
          Not us, this paid bots.

          Hurray patriots are now called that? kremleboty will pass it another option .. laughing
  4. +4
    5 October 2015 18: 15
    It was worth introducing sanctions on us, as ours, though slowly, but still began to develop our own developments in the field of UAVs.
    1. +2
      6 October 2015 02: 57
      Quote: katalonec2014
      It was worth introducing sanctions on us, as ours, though slowly, but still began to develop our own developments in the field of UAVs.

      That's right - slowly and only now ... and then more blah blah, everything is "unique" .. it's not for nothing that the professor laughs at us .. wassat
  5. +5
    5 October 2015 18: 16
    Well, let the bearded ones tremble at the sight of the angel of death. As it appears - soon the bakshish will fall on the head. So, as soon as I saw - it's time to do the legs! And without looking back, maybe you have time ... belay belay belay
  6. +4
    5 October 2015 18: 22
    Always believed in the talent of our people. And quick-witted Newtons, the Russian land to give birth ...
  7. +5
    5 October 2015 18: 28
    During the war, industry and design thought work an order of magnitude faster and more constructively. And therefore, there is nothing surprising. I won’t be surprised if some secret shock drone up to 20 tons, like SKAT, suddenly appears without identification marks, smashing the Igilov dump.
  8. +3
    5 October 2015 18: 47
    The information is described in a strange way, avionics created in the spirit of the concept of "network-centric wars" implies the construction of a whole system of control and interaction, transfer of information not only to UAVs, but also equipment, to the units participating in the battle. Are avionics tailored to the concept of "network-centric wars" or are we starting with UAVs?
  9. 0
    5 October 2015 18: 53
    The only thing that bothers is that they take off from the catapult.
    1. +1
      5 October 2015 19: 11
      Well, not only with a catapult, let’s put it. They already produce such a quantity that all at once can not be described. And Novorossia already uses radio-controlled toys in the database in conjunction with the F-1 and glasses from Ikea. (Video on the net is enough)
    2. +2
      5 October 2015 19: 16
      It is possible to use a catapult seriously reduces the cost of both the device itself and its use, and also makes it possible to launch from any surface, for example, sand, snow, rocky terrain. It is clear that with a heavy shock drones this number will not creep through and a full take-off run will be required.
  10. +2
    5 October 2015 19: 09
    Now the troops will begin to recruit gamers.
  11. +1
    5 October 2015 19: 33
    "... (avionics), which allows them to exchange information with the" ground "without an intermediary - a ground control point"

    Will the video stream via satellite be driven? Well, there’s nothing new, everything is said up to us, as they say, when I worked at the bank we had such a thing, not video, but they drove mail there and other things, the satellite modem had weak brains, it began to hang completely on twenty computers
  12. +2
    5 October 2015 19: 48
    Quote: Dyagilev
    Now the troops will begin to recruit gamers.


    It was necessary to start doing this 10-15 years ago.
    That is how much there is a system for the interaction of UAVs with units at the adversary.
    The backlog is the strongest.

    It may sound silly that all cadets of military schools must be not only taught, but also regularly forced to play computer shootings a couple of times a week.
    And among majors and above, hold computer games competitions.
    I am not kidding.
    For they (games) dictate the future development of network centrism in military affairs.
    They give development potential, ideas that are later taken by the developers of weapons and combat systems for implementation.
  13. +4
    5 October 2015 20: 28
    Russian drones will be equipped with unique on-board electronic equipment (avionics), which allows them to exchange information with the ground without an intermediary - a ground control point, reports RIA Novosti the message of the deputy general director of the United Instrument Making Corporation (OPK) Sergey Sokolov.

    Can someone translate from Russian into Russian what exactly my namesake wanted to say? How the drone will "exchange" information with the "ground" without a ground control point if the task of the drone is to transmit information to the ground, i.e. the same ground control room? request
    1. +3
      5 October 2015 20: 39
      Quote: professor
      Can someone translate from Russian into Russian what exactly my namesake wanted to say? How the drone will "exchange" information with the "ground" without a ground control point if the task of the drone is to transmit information to the ground, i.e. the same ground control room?

      good hi
      Yes, wound up by the deputy general director ... what Or a journalist ...
      So I want to say something about the grounding of the drone. laughing
      1. +2
        5 October 2015 20: 42
        Quote: andj61
        Yes, wound up by the deputy general director ... Or a journalist ...

        32 people plusanuli article. So they understood what it was about and it would not be difficult for them to explain to us, slow-witted. wink
    2. +2
      5 October 2015 21: 54
      Quote: professor
      How the drone will "exchange" information with the "ground" without a ground control point if the task of the drone is to transmit information to the ground, i.e. the same ground control room?

      Elementary, Professor: ground control will be in the air Yes . Thus, we mislead the enemy wink . He believes that the ground should be located on the ground !! fool
  14. +1
    5 October 2015 21: 10
    Dear, if you are closely following the information, it is already clear that the T-50 is almost a robot, the Armata platform is tested in automatic mode, Kamaz is testing unmanned vehicles, electronic warfare systems for protection, so draw a conclusion yourself, it turns out a "system", and this is one more step, to Professor without KP means directly to the "customer" without intermediate transfer of information and this is not necessarily a ground "customer" (air, sea, space), this will create a completely new system
    1. +7
      5 October 2015 21: 14
      Quote: 31rus
      Professor without KP means directly to the "customer" without intermediate information transfer and this is not necessarily a ground "customer" (air, sea, space), this will allow you to create a completely new system

      I do not want to offend anyone, but what is unique in simultaneously transmitting a video signal from the drone to several users? This option has long been implemented. request
  15. +2
    6 October 2015 00: 36
    It seems to me that as long as there is no Russian operating system in the computers and "Made in Russia" is written on the prots, it will not go far. sad There are algorithms, mathematical models, everything is clear, but even production equipment has to be purchased. Yes, any factory is decent to visit - BOSH, SIEMENS machine tools and Japanese-Koreans. So it's far from uniqueness. Although I would LIKE. How many years have Americans been flying on their "drummers"? But Russia still has promising projects. crying
    1. 0
      6 October 2015 16: 50
      And what does the Russian Elbrus or Baikal not suit you? Quite a processor. Yes, of course, the OS is based on bourgeois Linux. But she’s overloaded. And here I see nothing illegal.
  16. +1
    6 October 2015 04: 32
    Now the troops will begin to recruit gamers. Got it! At least some benefit from them will be! There is still half of the country in the "tanks" is cut!
  17. 0
    6 October 2015 09: 04
    Quote: professor
    I do not want to offend anyone, but what is unique in simultaneously transmitting a video signal from the drone to several users? This option has long been implemented.

    Pancake. First time I completely agree with the Professor belay . Muddy article. Or the journalist did not understand anything, and wrote garbage instead of explaining it to him. Or this electronics is unique only within the Russian Federation.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"