Military Review

The US Navy wrote off the last ship of the type Oliver H. Perry

37
In late September, on the basis of the U.S. Navy in Florida, a ceremony was held fleet the last active frigate of the Oliver H. Perry type - FFG 56 Simpson, reports the blog bmpd with reference to jacksonville.com.




"The ship was in the ranks of the US Navy exactly 30 years and was distinguished by the sinking of the Iranian missile boat P 225 Joshan (La Combattante II) during Operation Praying Mantis in the Persian Gulf 18 on April 1988, becoming the last American ship to sink an enemy warship" writes the edition.



In total, the US Navy was 51 frigate of this type. Their write-off began in 1994. According to the resource, from the number of decommissioned ships, “19 were transferred to foreign fleets: nine Turkey, including one as a source of spare parts, four to Egypt, two to Poland and Thailand, one to Bahrain and Pakistan”.

In April, the delivery of another 4 'pensioners' to Mexico and Thailand (two units each) was approved. The sale of several decommissioned frigates to Taiwan is also planned.

The US Navy wrote off the last ship of the type Oliver H. Perry
Photos used:
http://jacksonville.com/
37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. tronin.maxim
    tronin.maxim 5 October 2015 13: 00 New
    14
    You write off something for a long time, you need to send the stools and the process will go much faster!
    1. MIKHAN
      MIKHAN 5 October 2015 13: 07 New
      +6
      FFG 56 Simpson ... The series is over! laughing The USA is easier, the printing press works for them .... They will build a bunch more!
      1. lelikas
        lelikas 5 October 2015 13: 27 New
        +3
        Quote: MIKHAN
        FFG 56 Simpson ... The series is over!

        A new season has come out, where the Smitters admits to all that a bugger .... The crew of the new Simpson will also be recruited from these.
        1. Infinity
          Infinity 5 October 2015 13: 44 New
          +2
          Quote: lelikas
          You need to send the stools and the process will go much faster!

          It is necessary to give Ukraine. They asked ... laughing
          1. 2s1122
            2s1122 5 October 2015 14: 04 New
            +2
            You for the Ukrainian Navy are alien technologies, they won’t pull it. But the liferaft is just right.
          2. Rurikovich
            Rurikovich 5 October 2015 14: 06 New
            +2
            Quote: Infinity
            It is necessary to give Ukraine. They asked ...

            Do not give, but sell wink The British write off their armored personnel carriers with pleasure ... mmmm ... near lol You can also frigate the frigates. Any profit will be winked
    2. ivan bogomolov
      ivan bogomolov 5 October 2015 13: 17 New
      +3
      And his assistant, in the load for greater effect. wassat
    3. Samaritan
      Samaritan 5 October 2015 13: 25 New
      -1
      For reference: Vympel Shipyard delivered the thirtieth to the customer and launched the thirty-first boat of the 21850 Chibis project http://sdelanounas.ru/blogs/68667/
      1. Vladimir 1964
        Vladimir 1964 5 October 2015 14: 10 New
        +4
        Quote: Samaritan
        For reference: Vympel Shipyard delivered the thirtieth to the customer and launched the thirty-first boat of Project 21850


        Andrei, I'm sorry, colleague, what does this have to do with the publication?

        Do not blame me for your rating, though the comment is not clear. hi
        1. Samaritan
          Samaritan 5 October 2015 18: 24 New
          +1
          It amazes me that the site does not publish these news ... but reprints the yellow press! Fill in the blanks - so to speak :)
          He added to this news, because the fans of the Navy will mainly watch it!
    4. Andrea
      Andrea 5 October 2015 13: 40 New
      +5
      Quote: tronin.maxim
      You write off something for a long time, you need to send the stools and the process will go much faster!
      Written off is just an expression. In fact, it will be mothballed and will wait for the sale, or it will stand idle until completely lose its relevance.
      30 years for a ship is not a long time.
    5. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 5 October 2015 13: 41 New
      11
      нам ехидничать несчего,у них "бъёрков" больше 60 наклёпано,собираются довести до 90! а крейсера типа «Тикондерога» (CG-47) будут списаны к 2028 году «Берки» I и II серии (DDG-51) постепенно заменяются на DDG-51 серии III.так что,как то так.
      1. evil partisan
        evil partisan 5 October 2015 13: 56 New
        -5
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        у них "бъёрков" больше 60 наклёпано,собираются довести до 90!

        stop Stop panicking, Colleague! Let's not let Burke get to Rezh! We will lay the bones sadbut we will not give! am I personally will lie down under the cruiser soldier to save you ...
        Hi, alarmist! drinks
        1. Andrey Yuryevich
          Andrey Yuryevich 5 October 2015 15: 11 New
          +8
          he didn’t panic in life, but these are just facts for idiots. Hey Ya wink
      2. Vladimir 1964
        Vladimir 1964 5 October 2015 14: 12 New
        +1
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        нам ехидничать несчего,у них "бъёрков" больше 60 наклёпано,собираются довести до 90! а крейсера типа «Тикондерога» (CG-47) будут списаны к 2028 году «Берки» I и II серии (DDG-51) постепенно заменяются на DDG-51 серии III.так что,как то так.


        Yuryevich, do our colleagues hear you? hi
        1. Andrey Yuryevich
          Andrey Yuryevich 5 October 2015 15: 12 New
          0
          Quote: Vladimir 1964
          Yuryevich, do our colleagues hear you?

          а "наши коллеги"это кто? what and why shouldn't they hear? belay
    6. soratnik
      soratnik 5 October 2015 14: 29 New
      +1
      А наши бы его "модифицировали" и он ещё лет 20 поплавал как летают СУ-24 разработанные в 60-х годах прошлого века. Американцы слишком расточительны.
    7. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 5 October 2015 15: 26 New
      +1
      Quote: tronin.maxim
      You write off something for a long time, you need to send the stools and the process will go much faster!

      Better command of the Pacific Fleet of the early 90s. Compared to how they famously multiplied the Union’s second-strongest fleet, entrusted to them, for several years, Taburetkin is a small bipod.
  2. Lord of the Sith
    Lord of the Sith 5 October 2015 13: 01 New
    +5
    And they have by the way now a lot of ships for cancellation went. But this one really served his purpose. As already spread the table that is being prepared for cancellation.
  3. engineer74
    engineer74 5 October 2015 13: 02 New
    +7
    In April, the delivery of 4 more “pensioners” to Mexico and Thailand (two units each) was approved.

    But what about Ukraine ??? Really will not present ??? Hail !!! Obama to Gilyak! wassat
    1. MIKHAN
      MIKHAN 5 October 2015 13: 10 New
      +5
      Quote: engineer74
      In April, the delivery of 4 more “pensioners” to Mexico and Thailand (two units each) was approved.

      But what about Ukraine ??? Really will not present ??? Hail !!! Obama to Gilyak! wassat

      Ukraine has been rotting for many years ... Why do they need it?
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Good me
        Good me 5 October 2015 13: 25 New
        0
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Ukraine has been rotting for many years ... Why do they need it?


        После "Крымской весны",мало что досталось,даже из гнилья.

        И фактическое отсутствие флота для реализации поползновений к "великодержавности", руководителей укрорейха, конечно же беспокоит...
    2. 2224460
      2224460 5 October 2015 13: 10 New
      +1
      And Ukraine will be offered to chew gum and suck an icicle.
      1. lelikas
        lelikas 5 October 2015 13: 25 New
        0
        Quote: 2224460
        And Ukraine will be offered to chew gum and suck an icicle.

        They will give salmon tuna salmon.
    3. Cananecat
      Cananecat 5 October 2015 13: 12 New
      0
      That they even have no money for the maintenance of this junk. Why is it asked to give it, then to continue to pour into it ... the Yankees in this regard are quite dogmatic.
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. Mera joota
      Mera joota 5 October 2015 13: 39 New
      0
      Quote: engineer74
      But what about Ukraine ??? Really will not present ???

      If they give it, then in any case, after the ship is withdrawn from the Navy.
    6. Andrea
      Andrea 5 October 2015 13: 51 New
      +2
      Quote: engineer74
      But what about Ukraine ??? Really will not present ???
      For me, it’s better to give it!
      Не помню автора:"Хочешь разорить страну-подари ей крейсер".
      A frigate is enough for a ruin, especially since they already have one.
      1. Alexey RA
        Alexey RA 5 October 2015 15: 27 New
        +1
        Quote: Andrea
        Не помню автора:"Хочешь разорить страну-подари ей крейсер".
        A frigate is enough for a ruin, especially since they already have one.

        Помницца, когда решалась судьба "Мистралей", некоторые советовали передать их Украине - чтобы флот незалежной быстро и бесповоротно загнулся. smile

        By the way, the transfer of OHP to Ukraine was seriously discussed in 2008. But then everything died out
  4. avt
    avt 5 October 2015 13: 02 New
    0
    From the very beginning it was not a project, but a complete misunderstanding with a cannon in the middle.
    1. kepmor
      kepmor 5 October 2015 13: 31 New
      +1
      Согласен в вами,что проект был "так себе". Для войн с "папуасиями" годился но не более. Однако 30 лет в строю при их "коэффиценте боевой интенсивности"- впечатляет более чем. У нас до такого возраста, к огромному сожалению, доживают единицы- пожалуй только "Очаков" и "Сметливый" по 40 лет в строю. Очень горько вспоминать про 956 проект,который "цековские старцы" на корню загубили по своей тупости и жадности-видите ли не куда было девать ПГУ(котлы мазутные). Вот они и впихнули в новейшие ракетные эсминцы котлы от паровозов! Блин,неумные люди!
  5. aszzz888
    aszzz888 5 October 2015 13: 04 New
    0
    Here you are, that we do not need.
    Pure water wretchedness of those countries that buy. (I think try not buy it!)
    This vessel has already gone out of its own, and then buyers will also dump grandmas into it to keep it afloat.
  6. kil 31
    kil 31 5 October 2015 13: 14 New
    0
    Nothing is eternal under the Moon.
  7. demoniac1666
    demoniac1666 5 October 2015 13: 30 New
    +2
    " став последним американским кораблем, потопившим боевой корабль противника»-В смысле совсем последним!!! Больше НИКОГДА и НИ ОДИН американский корабль НИКОГО не потопит))))
  8. x.andvlad
    x.andvlad 5 October 2015 13: 46 New
    0
    If they give Ukraine, here they will have proud joy! Though decommissioned, albeit scrap metal, it is AMERICAN !!! This is almost NATO!
  9. Evgenia
    Evgenia 5 October 2015 13: 52 New
    0
    Yes, he rusted all!
  10. roskot
    roskot 5 October 2015 13: 55 New
    +1
    Yes, they went around Dill. And where to put the admirals?
    1. 2s1122
      2s1122 5 October 2015 14: 17 New
      0
      Как там было в мульте "Мадагаскар", в шлюбку и тихим ходом бороздить просторы океана.Вот куда этих адмиралов.
  11. Mera joota
    Mera joota 5 October 2015 13: 58 New
    +3
    The ship is not deservedly exposed to obstruction. This is a frigate, not a destroyer, its tasks are much more modest, hence the nomenclature of weapons. For its main function of PLO, it was very good. GAS AN / SQS-56 + towed SQR-19 + two PLO helicopters with the LAMPS system are more than good for a ship of this displacement. For comparison, domestic BOD pr.1155 had a much greater displacement and had virtually no strike weapons (except for Chabanenko). Not to mention the quantity in the series.
  12. Alex_59
    Alex_59 5 October 2015 14: 05 New
    +1
    Спорный был корабль. Артустановка в центре корпуса на надстройке - это лютая жесть. Фрегат "Старк" это гарантирует.
    1. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 5 October 2015 15: 34 New
      +2
      Quote: Alex_59
      Спорный был корабль. Артустановка в центре корпуса на надстройке - это лютая жесть. Фрегат "Старк" это гарантирует.

      А куда её ещё девать? В носу - однобалочная ПУ "стандартов". В корме - ангар и вертолётная площадка. Вот и пришлось засунуть "итальянку" в центр корпуса на надстройку.
    2. Alex_59
      Alex_59 5 October 2015 20: 45 New
      0
      Quote: Alexey RA
      And where else to put it?

      Ну остальные куда девают, немцы с французами и прочими русскими? А с такими углами обстрела... "Старк" не успел маневром по курсу загнать цель в эти углы, результат известен.

      Хотя конечно раздолбайство командира "Старка" - основная причина.
      1. Alexey RA
        Alexey RA 6 October 2015 10: 13 New
        0
        Quote: Alex_59
        Well, where are the rest doing, Germans with the French and other Russians?

        Так ОХП строились под другие задачи. Это должен был быть массовый дешёвый корабль для защиты атлантических конвоев в ходе операции Reforger (переброска сил США в Европу в начале ТМВ) и "дешёвое" дополнение эскорта АУГ и десантных сил (в дополнение к "дорогим" "Спрюенсам").
        Соответственно, главным было вписать в корпус средства ПЛО (ГАС + вертолёты) и ПВО соединения (ПУ "Стандартов"). А средства самообороны ставили уже по остаточному принципу.
        Quote: Alex_59
        А с такими углами обстрела... "Старк" не успел маневром по курсу загнать цель в эти углы, результат известен.

        Not so simple.
        Если бы цель изначально была классифицирована как враждебная и не было бы этих политических игрищ Госдепа с "дружественным Ираком", то "Старк" успевал и сманеврировать, и выдать ЦУ по цели, и даже поразить её до глубины души. А тут "Старк" 15 минут сопровождал цель (следуя постоянным курсом), дождался, пока она приблизится на 12 миль и захватит ФР своей БРЛС - и только после этого ПУ ЗРВ внезапно понял, что цель находится вне сектора стрельбы R2D2 и что неплохо бы сменить курс.
        Agree that with KON escort in wartime, no one would wait until the Tu-16/22 / 22M approaches 12 miles. smile
  13. Arktidianets
    Arktidianets 5 October 2015 18: 28 New
    0
    They can afford it, they have dishes up to a fig
  14. Olegovi4
    Olegovi4 5 October 2015 18: 35 New
    +1
    "став последним американским кораблем, потопившим боевой корабль противника" - а мне вот это больше всего понравилось. может пророчество....
  15. tomcat117
    tomcat117 5 October 2015 22: 01 New
    0
    The US Navy wrote off the last ship of the type Oliver H. Perry

    ... теперь его надо сброситьна на голову ИГИЛУ в пустыне, "по ошибке", взамен взорванного трактора, ох уж он им и пригодится против наших.
  16. Sevastopol 76
    Sevastopol 76 8 October 2015 23: 50 New
    0
    I went to demobilization)