Military Review

Heavy commander tread

40
Heavy commander tread



News about the beginning of Russia's military participation in operations against ISIS in Syria has firmly seized the lead on inforkanalah the world. Moreover, the entire day, even in Western countries, such havoc reigned in the presentation of the material that it was simply impossible to disassemble at least some official attitude of the politicians of these countries to the actions of Russia. It was only by the end of the day (in Europe), apparently coordinating the position with the State Department, that the tone of the messages more or less leveled off and became moderately negative. But in any case, the tone of numerous statements and statements of politicians and analysts expressed one main feeling - confusion.

Confusion happens by surprise. I don’t know if anyone seriously thought that Putin’s meeting with Obama could change Russia's position on the Syrian issue, but this surprise itself is even more surprising. Indeed, for a couple of months now, as Russia, without hiding at all, was preparing this operation. Remember the recent history with the prohibitions of the passage of our aircraft over Bulgaria and Greece, the cries of the State Department about this. And a multiple increase in the intensity of the work of the Syrian Express? In the blog of my comrade nosikot about this there is a whole group of great photos. That is, Russia did not hide anything, was preparing for a long time, actively and completely openly. So why suddenly such a surprise on the verge of "shock and awe"?

In the “Syrian history,” which has been lasting for four years, there are a lot of different questions, without answers to which it is extremely difficult to understand everything that is happening today, as well as the complex and ambiguous reaction in the West to these events. These are the questions that many ask themselves:

1. Why did Russia decide to directly participate in events just now, four years later? And why, or rather, why, yet decided?
2. Why is the West, in principle, opposed Assad?
3. Why did the West with the start of the war in Syria never decide on direct military participation by analogy with Libya?
4. What is ISIS, who created it and why?
5. Why is the US reaction to Russian activity so ambiguous?
6. Why are Syria’s neighbors Turkey and KSA behaving strangely?
7. What is the role of Israel in the events in Syria?
8. Where did the coordination center in Baghdad suddenly come from? And why in Baghdad?
9. How are Ukraine, Syria and Yemen connected?

Such questions may be much more. And, most interestingly, not one of them has a simple and unambiguous answer. Unfortunately, modern humanity has become accustomed to simple questions and the same simple answers to them. It is necessary to find at least one plausible explanation for an event, how a person calms down and considers it to be true until the moment when another oddity ceases to fit into the painted picture of the world. All this can be very clearly observed in Syria.

From the very beginning, the process of destabilization in Syria was perceived as an element of the “Arab spring”. Four years ago, few doubted that the events in this country would clearly develop according to the Libyan or, at worst, Egyptian scenario. But time passed, and the farther, the more what was happening in this country began to differ significantly from the “standard”. To the surprise of many, Assad behaved completely differently than Gaddafi. To even greater surprise, the Syrian army was in no hurry to decompose and scatter. And the awesomeness of the Western coalition in the fight against the “dictator” looked absolutely surprising. It is possible to attribute this indecision to the influence of Moscow and Tehran, which immediately took a fairly clear position, having provided Assad with real help by people (Iran) and weapons (Russia), but from a purely military point of view this help was hardly capable of changing anything fundamentally. Even the Russian S-300s delivered to Assad could not have drastically affected the situation if the West had used massive bombing. Moreover, the Syrian leader, for his part, was also not in a hurry to put them into business. The repeated and almost unpunished raids of the Israeli aviation on Syrian objects to confirm this.

And here arises the main question. Was it necessary for the West to win a quick and decisive victory in Syria? And the answer to this question is very twofold. A very quick and very decisive victory for the West in Syria definitely wanted and even planned. But under the guise of the triumph of the internal opposition, which has decisively displaced its dictator. That is, I wanted to, but only in the form in which it could be represented by purely intra Syrian fights. And as soon as this plan failed, the “game” immediately shifted to long sluggish maneuvers. This moment must be very well understood. It is connected with the fact that the planning of the fall of Assad proceeded simultaneously under several mutually exclusive strategic scenarios.
The first, the one that is fast and internal, had several consistent results. The fall of Assad - the coming to power in Syria of forces controlled by the West - the attack of the coalition on Iran - the creation of a single zone of tension from Syria to Afghanistan - pressure through the South on Russia. I have already painted this script in some detail before, because now I give it only in the form of a bare diagram. In parallel, this scenario envisaged the construction of oil and gas pipelines from the Middle East to Europe from KSA, Qatar and Iran, bypassing Russia, that is, creating a powerful opportunity for economic pressure on Russia (and China). Under this scenario, large-scale financing of the Syrian rebels from Qatar and KSA was attracted. From the north, for assisting in the destruction of Assad, Turkey was promised control over the regions inhabited by Syrian Kurds. And this assistance was planned in the form of direct participation of the Turkish military in ground operations.

At some point, this script failed. I am not ready to state unequivocally why exactly this happened. Has the impact on the events of Russia, whether the active assistance to Assad from Iran and Hezbollah, or ambivalence to what is happening in US ruling circles? Most likely, the last factor played a crucial role, if not decisive. If you recall, the beginning of events falls on the first term of the Obama presidency, when the State Department ruled Hillary Clinton. But the failures began after the election of Obama for a second term, when he managed to get rid of the reckless partner in tandem. And this is not a matter of personal confrontation. This is a question of the fundamental choice of the path of development of the USA from two mutually exclusive alternatives. In the scenario, carried out in the life of Clinton, Obama was prepared for the role of sacred sacrifice, which for some reason was not at all happy and tried in every way to avoid the fate prepared for him.

Here to the place to recall a number of mystical predictions that are in direct connection with the events taking place in the region in question.

There are three basic predictions:
1. The rise of Russia will begin with the fall of Syria.
2. The last president of the United States will be 44, he is a black American.
3. 3-I world war will begin with the territory of Iran.

There are other, more vague, in which the beginning of the "apocalypse" and the arrival of the Savior are associated precisely with Syria.

Any predictions are always just a more or less likely forecast of events for a certain scenario. And this scenario, which involves fundamental changes in the entire modern world order, is primarily dangerous for the current authorities of all countries involved in the scenario. Even for Russia, whose predictions promise the return of greatness, its realization is extremely dangerous, associated with colossal casualties and losses. And even more so this scenario is not attractive for Iran and the United States. Is it any wonder that there is a constant search for alternatives that can change what was intended and put the story in a different direction?

The Clinton clan - The Rockefellers saw salvation in the rapid buildup of threats to Russia at all costs. Creating a huge single aggressive space in the southern underbelly of Russia from the Caucasus to Afghanistan, with insufficiently active opposition from Russia, could well not only create huge security problems for it, but also lead to the complete collapse of our country. It is necessary to assume that the hordes of religious militant fanatics managed to cross the mountains to the Great Steppe on such a broad front, and our country would have been waiting for a war more terrible than the Great Patriotic.

The key to starting this scenario was the fall of Iran. And here you can remember the persistence of Israel in recent years has led the United States to war against this state. By all means, including even aerial bombardment of objects on its territory.

And the key to the attack on Iran was the fall of Syria. While Assad's radars are capable of monitoring the airspace over their own country, a successful attack on Iran for a potential coalition was not at all guaranteed. And failure could easily lead to unpredictable consequences for both Israel and the United States. The death of Israel and the loss of American influence in the Middle East would be the least of the evils. This is, so to speak, a geopolitical factor with a military bias.

Asad’s stubbornness led the Clinton clan to begin the creation of a Caliphate not in all the previously planned space, but in its relatively controlled part in Iraq with the transition to Syria. At the same time, under the influence of Obama’s resistance, there was a change in the script itself. Now under the immediate threat was not Russia, but Saudi Arabia. The war with Iran was supposed to turn into a religious war between the Sunnis and the Shiites. For this, even a provocation was carried out with the explosion of the situation in Yemen. The simultaneous lifting of sanctions on Iran was to solve two urgent problems. Eliminate direct US involvement in hostilities, as well as strengthen Iran by unblocking its oil trade so that it can win the war against KSA. Then the United States planned to destroy the weakened winner under the guise of a peacekeeping operation. As a result, the entire Middle East would become a gigantic space of chaos, not controlled by anyone and nothing. As a result, Russia would be seriously and for a long time occupied by the suppression of this chaos on its southern borders, and the United States could once again reap the laurels of the winner by proxy. For this, even Israel would be sacrificed, at the same time eliminating for the US a source of huge and unnecessary country spending. And to tidy up Europe completely, controlling at the same time Russia's revenues from energy supplies to it.

According to open sources, it is extremely difficult to judge all the nuances of a secret policy and the negotiations held between all parties. But anyway, Iran did not go into a trap. He accepted the sacrifice in the form of the lifting of sanctions, but is not yet seeking to fight with KSA. The Saudis themselves found themselves in a dual position. Understanding perfectly well that their salvation is no longer in US support, but quite the contrary, they sharply reduced support for Syrian rebels, and at the same time tried to stop Iran’s activity in Yemen.

As for ISIS, the United States has driven itself into a kind of trap. After it turned out that Russia had leverage over Turkey, preventing its direct participation in ground operations in Syria, the United States urgently needed an armed mass capable of destroying the remnants of Syrian statehood. On the territory of Syria itself, there were not enough people, it was necessary to connect Iraq. This is how ISIS was born. There is more than enough evidence on the same network that it is the United States that is behind the creation, financing and arming of ISIS. But at the same time, the United States cannot publicly declare its support for ISIS without a cardinal loss of image. After all, it is their own henchmen sitting in power in Iraq. And the external image of ISIS is so disgusting for any civilized person that open support is suicidal for any respectable politician.

As a result, the United States declared a public war of ISIS in approximately the same way as in 39, England and France declared war on Hitler without making any real effort. And if we add to all this the continuing need for the development and financing of ISIS and the blatant illegality of any actions by the United States and the coalition in the region from the point of view of international law, then it becomes clear the depth of the abyss that the United States has dug. But this gap could have remained covered for some time with a fig leaf, if not for one “but”. This "but" - the actions of Russia.

Here it is necessary to highlight a few points. First, the exact time selected. Despite the loud howl of “patriots” of all stripes, Russia managed to almost completely stop the situation in the Donbas. Today, the possibility of a sharp escalation of military confrontation in Ukraine is reduced to almost zero. And the sluggish development of the situation in this country is in the hands of Russia. Today, neither from the United States, nor from the side of Europe drowning in the flows of refugees, Ukraine should not wait for substantial financial assistance. And for almost two years of power, the junta brought its own economic situation to complete incapacity. Today, the survival of Ukraine is only a matter of assistance from Russia, and no one else. This explains the panic and the amazing "schizophrenia" of the statements and actions of politicians in Kiev. And this assistance is provided, but exactly to the extent not to allow a new round of civil war.

Freedom from problems in Ukraine allowed Moscow to move to more active actions in Syria. And here, too, there are three levels of tasks and goals.

The first and most obvious is the indicative legitimate use of force. If this use of force is also effective, and there is almost no doubt about it, then in a fairly quick time (months) Syria has every chance of restoring full-fledged statehood. Of course, this will require wisdom from the side of Assad. Compromise with those with whom, in principle, it is possible to reach an agreement, granting autonomy to the Kurds, and so on. But for the whole world it will be a demonstration of effective power from Russia. Against this background, the position of the United States will look extremely pale, even within the political crisis, signs of which are already observed in the political circles of the United States. Obama is already trying in every way to distance himself from what Clinton and his comrades have done in the Middle East. And thus virtually eliminate it from the presidential race that has begun.

The second level of tasks that Russia solves in Syria is the control of the coast. Given the landscape in Syria, there are not many places where a gas pipeline can be laid across its territory to the Mediterranean coast. This is the valley of the Bekaa River. And its control areas of Tartus and Latakia. The Russian bases in these areas actually take control of all possible points of the gas pipeline construction. An alternative route is possible only on the territory of Israel, but this option is unacceptable for the latter. Too high risks for its own statehood.

Finally, there is a third, most serious level. It seems that an agreement was reached with Assad on the creation of full-fledged Russian military bases on the territory of Syria. Naval in Tartus and military in Latakia. And this event, if held already global geopolitical values. From the 18 of the 20th century, Russia sought to emerge from the Black Sea to the expanses of the Mediterranean. And each time her efforts were blocked by the West. Base in Syria is the complete control of the Mediterranean region. Moreover, the entire infrastructure of NATO is aimed at repelling threats only from the North. The flight time from Syria to Italy is just 20 minutes. Gibraltar - 30 minutes. About the control of Suez and not have to say. The importance of Turkey as a member of NATO is practically reduced to zero. And the same Egypt is already in full demonstrating its loyalty and friendliness towards Russia. In this context, rumors about selling Mistral to Egypt look interesting.

What is most interesting, all these plans of Russia are obvious to the USA. But it is much more curious that the United States does not even try to seriously hinder these plans. The enemies of Russia even began to shout that this Russia is acting on the order of the United States, playing into their hands. But everything is different. Both Russia and the United States, represented by Obama, are still acting within the framework of the strategy of the Global TC. The United States relinquishes control over the Middle East of Russia, while simultaneously trying to finally subjugate Europe to itself. But already as an elementary colony, allowing the United States to nest in the framework of the "Atlantic partnership" and recover in this self-isolation after a long economic self-destruction.

If you look at the chronology, then from May-June, the time when, apparently, the final decision was made on Syria (remember Kerry’s “historic” visit to Sochi?), All actions by the United States and Russia are more or less coordinated. The United States is reducing its activity in Ukraine, but at the same time initiating a massive invasion of refugees to Europe. At the same time, the debt market of the EU through Greece is being tested for strength, and recently they are setting up an exemplary spanking of one of the largest European companies - Volkswagen. At the same time, any actions of Russia to increase aid to Syria are indicatively ignored.

The external cold tone in relations between Russia and the United States should not deceive anyone. In addition to the "realpolitik", there is also a public policy, designed for an internal audience. Today, it can be stated that it is very likely that the United States will leave the Middle East as the leading Player. And the main indicator of this is not even Russia's activity in Syria, but the creation of a focal point in Iraq. Iraq is also leaving American influence. In its place comes Russia and partly Iran.

But the game is not over yet. Ahead of a new round, the round of the struggle for Europe. And here, while the US is ahead of Russia by several steps. But even the mention of casual problems of secret backroom unions in Putin’s speech from the UN podium suggests that Russia is not only aware of these plans, but is also ready for active opposition. Another thing is whether there is enough time and resources for this. But in any case, it will be another story.

In the meantime, there is a process of manifestation of geopolitical decisions of the GAC in the Middle East. The process of manifestation of geopolitical greatness of Russia. And, which is very significant, in full accordance with the norms of international law.
Author:
Originator:
http://chipstone.livejournal.com/1277176.html
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. marlin1203
    marlin1203 6 October 2015 14: 03 New
    +4
    Old as the world ... "What is allowed to Jupiter ..." That's just bulls against! .. laughing And this will have to be reckoned with.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 6 October 2015 14: 21 New
      +5
      1. Why did Russia decide to directly participate in events just now, four years later? And why, or rather, why, yet decided?
      It was necessary to rearm the army a little. 4 years ago we would be crushed there.
      2. Why is the West, in principle, opposed Assad?
      He does not like the west, that’s all.
      3. Why did the West with the start of the war in Syria never decide on direct military participation by analogy with Libya?
      Such an option would not have rolled in the UN. Russia would veto
      5. Why is the US reaction to Russian activity so ambiguous?
      They come to their senses, there will be a reaction and everything else.
      6. Why are Syria’s neighbors Turkey and KSA behaving strangely?
      And what is the oddity?
      7. What is the role of Israel in the events in Syria?
      Bye bystander.
      8. Where did the coordination center in Baghdad suddenly come from? And why in Baghdad?
      Because there everything happened with ISIS.
      9. How are Ukraine, Syria and Yemen connected?
      Everywhere ears stick out.
      4. What is ISIS, who created it and why?
      ISIS was created by the former military of Saddam, who was kicked out of service. Who is financing it now is not known and it is not clear. ISIS lays a bolt on everyone and on us and on the amers with the Saudis.

      Well, roll for 3 world goblets or something recourse
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. Alexander Romanov
                Alexander Romanov 6 October 2015 15: 34 New
                0
                Quote: MainBeam
                Go away yourself.

                This is not for you, you have deleted the comment above
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                2. Eugene-Eugene
                  Eugene-Eugene 6 October 2015 18: 48 New
                  +2
                  Surface analysis, both in the author and in the comments, is not a word about China, and this country is not the last player in this game.
            2. The comment was deleted.
      2. rosarioagro
        rosarioagro 6 October 2015 14: 50 New
        +1
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        It was necessary to rearm the army a little. 4 years ago we would be crushed there.

        What 4 years ago, that now ISIS and air defense did not have ISIS and others, well, apart from MANPADS from the arsenals of Libya and Iraq, who and what would crush the air group there?
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 6 October 2015 15: 01 New
          0
          Quote: rosarioagro
          What 4 years ago, that now ISIS and air defense did not have ISIS and others, well, apart from MANPADS from the arsenals of Libya and Iraq, who and what would crush the air group there?

          And then and now our main enemy is the United States, and not a bunch of scumbags. And then we would have faced the states. And now we will face.
      3. SALLAK
        SALLAK 6 October 2015 16: 44 New
        0
        The article answers questions, offers answers, and you have mostly air concussion ... Why ?? Just be smart? Especially ridiculed 3 question and answer ...
      4. Constructor1
        Constructor1 6 October 2015 16: 44 New
        +1
        Yes, an interesting article, I do not agree with all the conclusions, but the versions are interesting))
      5. igor.borov775
        igor.borov775 6 October 2015 18: 34 New
        +2
        There are a lot of questions, but alas, there are no unambiguous answers. What is more, Saddam. The leaders of this gathering were trained under the supervision of a Yankee. You don’t have to think about the US that they are stupid. No, they have calculated everything. The only thing they didn’t think of was Russia. All this mess was laid by the great experts in creating conflicts for the future by England. It in the last century created smoldering problems wherever it could. Borders. Look only at Africa constantly conflicts across borders. This is also the case here. The Yankis also take this into account. Even before the invasion of Iraq, they did not hide the fact that many states in the Middle East should not be. New ones need to be created. They pulled the KSA and the Emirates to the struggle for a change of government in northern Africa. Bummer only in one place occurred with Algeria. He managed it himself and the democrat said no. Emirates and KSA then politely estranged from those affairs and offered to do the same there closer. It’s a kind of carte blanche. But they simply didn’t leave it unattended but corrected it. And the former military were just soldiers in the Empire created by these craftsmen. Putin suddenly declared at the General Assembly that is, Russia is saving the statehood of the countries of the Middle East. Nobody expected this. And then bombs rained down on all these gentlemen. And a statement at the official request and agreement of the representatives (legitimate) and the authorities of the state of Syria. There are no other representatives. This immediately confused all the maps of the great democrats. And here they also missed that Zrdogan a year ago called for learning the Ottoman language. It is clear that Persia will no longer be able to disintegrate from within. Such a heap of contradictions at first glance. And these are all the lights for protecting human rights.
      6. Bkmz
        Bkmz 6 October 2015 18: 41 New
        0
        I join the glass. Well, as they say: "Be sure to groan - the whole world is in ruins, but then!"
      7. SPACE
        SPACE 6 October 2015 20: 46 New
        0
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        ISIS was created by the former military of Saddam, who was kicked out of service.

        The USSR actually created the military and intelligence of Saddam, they were always under the hood of the KGB, probably now the FSB is in the know ...
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Who is financing it now is not known and not clear.

        The US financial corporations themselves can put and remove presidents and they can afford the financing and organization of a warrior, including secretly even from their own government. The publicly conducted policy of the official authorities of the United States and not only is forced to adhere to the norms of international law, even in the case of informational propaganda cover.
    2. Sterlya
      Sterlya 6 October 2015 15: 03 New
      +1
      it will be easier to answer questions in a couple of weeks (maybe)
    3. igor.borov775
      igor.borov775 6 October 2015 17: 46 New
      +3
      In principle, the prospect review is correct. By the end of the year, the signing of the Antlantic Free Trade Zone should be agreed. The review forgot to mention one more aspect. Signature of the Pacific Free Trade Zone is being prepared. Russia has no place in all these grandiose projects. Now China and China have been added to Russia. China has already checked this and knows. Russia and China are outcasts in these open spaces. And there is no talk of all the rest. They also want to get into these zones, but so far bypass. In this grandiose common market, North America, the EU is Europe's caretaker in Europe. Two Australia and Japan are still claiming in the east. no keeper in the east has been selected. In principle, PAX AMERICA is preparing to earn money. We and China are excluded from this holiday. Such are the problems that will appear before us in the near future. Abama is in a hurry. This is the most important thing for him, and everything else is to make the outcasts solve the problems that they themselves created the USA. As they said earlier, to distract attention.
      1. Dembel77
        Dembel77 6 October 2015 20: 17 New
        0
        Not a bad story. It was written in a fascinating and competent way (not a single grammatical error and only three spelling). Everything is finely chewed for direct-flow brains (flies into one ear, passes through the brain and immediately flies out of the other). In general, I am glad to read! One did not catch up - where does the commander and his heavy tread?
  2. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 6 October 2015 14: 04 New
    +23
    Remember Putin's Plan ..? And he acts damn it .. bully
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. inkass_98
      inkass_98 6 October 2015 14: 39 New
      +3
      Quote: MIKHAN
      Remember Putin's Plan ..?

      The old gangster was right. With a kind word and a revolver, a much greater degree of persuasion can be achieved.
  3. Sharky
    Sharky 6 October 2015 14: 06 New
    +30
    I want to tell you a story that happened yesterday in a bar with me. After a working day, we all as usual gathered at the bar for a couple of cups of beer ... My work colleagues from different countries (I am from Russia) communicate in English. We have a Scot in our team, one more from London, a Dutchman, a couple of Lithuanians and one from the former Dutch colony - Sint Maarten. We never talk about politics; this is our unspoken rule. About fishing, women, repairs, sports (I even began to watch rugby with a Scot, although I did not know the rules of the game at all) ... But not about politics. And then, as usual, we dispersed a couple of cups of beer, discussed all kinds of gossip about work, when the TV turned on and spicy on the Sky news channel! Well, there is a report about ISIS and how they blow up cultural monuments in the Syrian Palmyra. “Warm”, after a couple of cups of tea of ​​beer, an elderly Scotsman immediately began to protest: “This is a crime! You have to punish it!” Everyone waved their heads approvingly (me too). But the video went on and unexpectedly for me, the Dutchman (also already warm) said that he supported Putin and what he was doing in Syria! Also stating that there is a lot of propaganda on Skynews and in general, there’s only one depressu! No good news! Everyone nodded their heads and began to assent, but for me it was a revelation that, despite all the Western propaganda, EU residents can still separate cutlets from flies! Already not the heart somehow it became easy! In short, it was immediately decided to turn off this mediocre box (they just finished showing off the shooting of our bombing and some kind of nonsense started) and got another bottle out of the refrigerator :). Of course, I attacked them yesterday, that today I’m fishing for a sutra, but I’m in a good mood! Here it is.
    1. neri73-r
      neri73-r 6 October 2015 15: 49 New
      -2
      (I am from Russia)


      If you are from Russia, then please write in Russian! stop
      1. Temples
        Temples 6 October 2015 17: 07 New
        +5
        Well, you too, my friend in Russian write! hi
      2. arane
        arane 6 October 2015 18: 42 New
        +3
        Well, there are different errors. Often just technical! Why bounce?
        I use the iPad. Recently wrote about Brzezinski. So this bastard (iPad) everywhere Bzezhinsky changed to Dzerzhinsky. I did not notice. He himself laughed for a long time.
        1. afdjhbn67
          afdjhbn67 7 October 2015 01: 08 New
          +1
          Quote: arane
          Well, there are different errors. Often just technical! Why bounce?
          I use the iPad. Recently wrote about Brzezinski. So this bastard (iPad) everywhere Bzezhinsky changed to Dzerzhinsky. I did not notice. He himself laughed for a long time.

          I minus you for this, I apologize, I return the favor laughing hi
        2. Weyland
          Weyland 7 October 2015 01: 14 New
          0
          Quote: arane
          So this bastard (iPad) everywhere Bzezhinsky changed to Dzerzhinsky.


          And right - nefig BжезInsky call Bзежinsky! wink
        3. The comment was deleted.
      3. Sharky
        Sharky 6 October 2015 19: 42 New
        0
        I look that you are neri73-r - literate ... Only they themselves got into trouble laughing!
  4. A1L9E4K9S
    A1L9E4K9S 6 October 2015 14: 09 New
    0
    Not everything is so simple in this world, the devil himself will break his legs, but he will not figure it out.
  5. kolkulon
    kolkulon 6 October 2015 14: 13 New
    0
    The main thing is that health is enough for implementation. We cannot find another such head.
    1. Cube123
      Cube123 6 October 2015 15: 26 New
      +3
      Quote: kolkulon
      The main thing is that health is enough for implementation. We cannot find another such head.

      Most importantly, he managed to create a TEAM capable of action. And he managed to drive away that depressu that enveloped the country from the beginning of the 80s. It is amazing how quickly, by historical standards, this was done. So much for the role of personality in history.
  6. figter
    figter 6 October 2015 14: 27 New
    +1
    What is most interesting, all these plans of Russia are obvious to the USA. But it is much more curious that the United States does not even try to seriously hinder these plans. The enemies of Russia even began to shout that this Russia is acting on the order of the United States, playing into their hands. But everything is different. Both Russia and the United States, represented by Obama, are still acting within the framework of the strategy of the Global TC. The United States relinquishes control over the Middle East of Russia, while simultaneously trying to finally subjugate Europe to itself. But already as an elementary colony, allowing the United States to nest in the framework of the "Atlantic partnership" and recover in this self-isolation after a long economic self-destruction.

    Thus, we fully expect the transfer of the vector of tension from the Middle East back to Europe. Then it will be "Hello again, Ukraine!" After all, the United States cannot but crap! Ukraine is now in the very state when it will be guided by any promises, if only they would give money.
    1. Uncle VasyaSayapin
      Uncle VasyaSayapin 6 October 2015 14: 33 New
      +3
      The USA fenced off Ukraine from us by Ukraine. It’s difficult to climb into Europe without deciding with Ukraine. I think somehow.
  7. Mainbeam
    Mainbeam 6 October 2015 14: 29 New
    +2
    this scenario provided for the construction of oil and gas pipelines from the Middle East to Europe from KSA, Qatar and Iran, bypassing Russia, that is, it created a powerful opportunity for economic pressure on Russia

    At least someone wrote about the economics of war.
    Thanks for the article, there would be more of these.
    And then they’ll go to the top, the media will retell, and the analysts - zero.

  8. Ignatius
    Ignatius 6 October 2015 14: 37 New
    +1
    Meanwhile, in Yemen ...

    “The army and people's committees reflected the efforts of Saudi mercenaries to move to Bab al-Mandeb four times,” an FNA source said on Monday.

    “Army forces and people's committees killed or wounded dozens of Saudi coalition soldiers and their mercenaries who tried to maintain control of Bab al-Mandeb,” the source added.

    An FNA source, who is an army officer, said the Saudi military were also defeated in the Jebel al-Nasr region and lost a number of forces.

    The strait of Bab al-Mandeb (divides the Arabian Peninsula and Africa) and its coastal areas were under massive ground and air strikes by Saudi forces under the leadership of the coalition and forces loyal to the fugitive president Mansour Hadi.

    The Yemeni Ministry of Defense was the first to confirm on Sunday that the large-scale offensive by the Saudi coalition, in order to take control of the Bab al-Mandeb Strait in West Yemen, was repelled.

    In an interview for al-Mayadin news channel, an informed source denied the occupation of the Bab al-Mandeb Strait by Saudi Arabia.

    “Clashes continue in Bab al-Mandeb and the army, and people's committees forced the mercenaries and coalition forces to leave,” he added.

    Yemeni forces and Ansarullah (a paramilitary group of Shiite Zeidites) shot down a helicopter and a reconnaissance drone in the western regions of the country.

    Saudi Arabia bombed Yemen for 194 days to restore power to President Hadi, a close ally of Riyadh. At least 6445 Yemenis were killed in the conflict, including hundreds of women and children.

    Hadi resigned in January and refused to reconsider the decision, despite calls from the revolutionaries of the Ansarullah Huti movement.

    Despite Riyadh's claims that he is bombing the positions of Ansarullah fighters, Saudi warplanes also raid residential areas and civilian infrastructures.

    Source http://podrobnosti.biz/news/7372-proliv-bab-almandeb-polnostyu-kontroliruetsya-y

    emenskoy-armiey /
  9. Boa kaa
    Boa kaa 6 October 2015 14: 44 New
    +6
    Good analysis. But he only confirms that the states are "rolling up". They scored in BV, can not do anything in Syria, slowly gray out Ukraine. Teeth hold on to Europe. Why?
    And remember Obama’s speech when he presented the new doctrine of the multipolar world. The main efforts are Southeast Asia, the main rival is China. Even the world gendarme already lacks the forces for comprehensive control in all directions.
    Let's see what they show in the Asia-Pacific region. The first steps have already been taken: an economic union of the region has been created with free trade, but without the leading player - China. Undercover fuss seems to start from the economic field. Let's see what's next ...
    Yours faithfully, hi
  10. kepmor
    kepmor 6 October 2015 14: 50 New
    +2
    Good analytics, although there are controversial issues, but they can be understood and reasoned only after some time. Finally, the main idea was voiced - the primary source of world chaos are the Zionist world clans (the Rothschilds, Rockefellers and other liquid massonism). And the main goal of the liquid masses is the destruction of RUSSIA both as a state and as a cultural and moral heritage. The Jews need only the territory and bowels of RUSSIA. The terrible thing for us Russians is that their "servants" have settled everywhere in RUSSIA since the age of 17. The most odious people in power, business, rotten intelligence and home-grown opposition are mostly Jews. They don’t have a sense of patriotism for the country, which they live in (and most of them have dual or even triple citizenship). They are ruled only by an indefatigable sense of profit!
  11. Gray 43
    Gray 43 6 October 2015 14: 55 New
    0
    Shtatniks fear that China, under the guise of a BV, will begin to tackle its affairs in the strategic zone of the United States in Southeast Asia, not without reason is it waiting for something, despite all the predictions about the participation of the PRC army against terrorists in Syria
  12. Lecha57
    Lecha57 6 October 2015 14: 59 New
    0
    The NATO Fighter crushed NATO warriors for the tremendous success of our aviation, and therefore they began to unleash anti-Russian hysteria.
  13. Denis DV
    Denis DV 6 October 2015 15: 28 New
    +1
    Where without mysticism. The Pashtuns still believe that the Russian cavalry will converge in a great battle with the English, and will race thousands of horses without riders! bully article +
  14. dimhl
    dimhl 6 October 2015 16: 35 New
    0
    People! did not quite understand why:
    "This is the Bekaa River Valley. And it is controlled by the regions of Tartus and Latakia. Russian bases in these areas actually take control of all possible points of the gas pipeline construction. An alternative route is possible only through Israel, but this option is unacceptable for the latter. The risks are too high for it own statehood. "
    Who can - make it clear
  15. Sergelis
    Sergelis 6 October 2015 16: 43 New
    0
    An interesting article, but too many speculation, and all the speculation in a positive bias for Russia
    1. igor.borov775
      igor.borov775 6 October 2015 18: 51 New
      +1
      Explain where the speculation is. What is wrong. What is the creation of the Atlantic Free Trade Zone. Or in another Pacific Zone. Then you have a poor idea of ​​what bets have been made and what will happen in the near future. By the way, everywhere in these created zones the jurisdiction can be judged by the press yourself guess which is higher. Here in the EU is higher than the British. And if everything goes well. OH WELL.
  16. akudr48
    akudr48 6 October 2015 16: 47 New
    +1
    Today it can be stated that with a high degree of probability the United States will leave the Middle East as a leading player.

    For today and in the long run, it is by no means possible to state what the author said above.

    As long as there is oil in the Middle East, there is Israel and there is Saudi Arabia, the United States will remain the leading player.

    You can move them and take on some of the functions of a leading player, which Russia is trying to do.

    But they will not leave the Middle East. If you remain a realist, not a dreamer.
    1. igor.borov775
      igor.borov775 6 October 2015 18: 54 New
      +1
      And who told you that they donate everything to Russia, no. They won’t surrender anything. just a little status quo will be different if you succeed.
  17. Donrumum
    Donrumum 6 October 2015 17: 34 New
    0
    Thank you for the article. Author 5+.
  18. Denis Skiff
    Denis Skiff 6 October 2015 21: 01 New
    +1
    From the outside it seemed at some point that Syria was in the balance, from disappearance along with Assad.
    1. Lyton
      Lyton 7 October 2015 05: 20 New
      0
      Quote: Denis-Skiff
      From the outside it seemed at some point that Syria was in the balance, from disappearance along with Assad.

      It was true komenty that Assad was about to end, but then bam and help came from where they had been waiting for her in Syria for a long time.
  19. Alex_59
    Alex_59 8 October 2015 08: 43 New
    0
    I am glad that ours act prudently and most importantly non-standardly, tearing down the tower for everyone and constantly turning the chessboard over. I've been watching this for a long time. It feels like the United States and its allies are setting things up, driving us to the point they need, but each time the Russian Federation is not just outside the trap, but even behind the attackers. There are many examples. Remember the chemical weapons in Syria that were spun up to launch the legitimate and legitimate bombing of NATO against Assad? Ours offered their services for the destruction of these weapons, which confused all plans. Then Ukraine - everyone was waiting for Russia to send troops, but it did not enter. Nobody expected such an easy and quick transition of Crimea to the Russian Federation, it was hard to believe that Russia would decide on this at all, but this happened again suddenly and in violation of all ideas about "how it should be." Now, again, Syria - everyone is used to the US bombing and pacifying someone, no one else is behaving like this in the world, and suddenly Russia is doing the same, but it’s absolutely legal, at the request of Assad.
    Our just beauties. Putin and Lavrov (no matter how controversial characters are) have already written their names in golden letters in the history of the Motherland ... The main thing is to continue without misfires.