Rating: Russian army in second place after the US

79
The US armed forces are by far the most powerful in the world, followed by the armed forces of Russia and China. Such a conclusion was made by the Swiss bank Credit Suisse in a study entitled “The end of globalization or a more multi-polar world”. Rating data leads the agency Ридус.



In the ranking table, Russia ranks 2-place, significantly behind the United States. Behind it, with a minimum lag in the final scores, China is located. The fourth line is occupied by Japan. India researchers gave 5-th place.

The analysis conducted by the bank’s specialists “testifies to the military superiority of the United States in the ability to wage conventional war in comparison with its closest rivals,” the document says.

In addition, "in the technical arsenal, including including 13900 aircraft and 920 helicopters, 20 aircraft carriers and 72 submarines, the Pentagon is significantly superior to its closest pursuers," the authors of the study write.



The document also draws attention to the "giant military budget of the United States, which significantly exceeds the budgets of the ministries of defense of all the other countries of the top ten combined." Last year's American defense spending was $ 610 billion.

The authors, however, recognize that their research does not provide a complete and objective picture, since the index they use, for example, does not take into account the nuclear arsenals of states.

By the way, the “strongest” army in Europe - the Ukrainian - did not enter the top 20 rating at all.
79 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    1 October 2015 17: 53
    Yes, at the first, we are at the first ... they just didn’t understand there (or do not want to understand)
    Figures are important of course ... but most importantly EFFICIENCY !!!
    1. +32
      1 October 2015 17: 58
      Russia at the last ... So I think it's better! bully We will be calmer in Syria ...))))
      1. +21
        1 October 2015 18: 00
        There is a much stronger army that holds back the Russian army and saves Europe !!! wink
        1. +13
          1 October 2015 18: 03
          Quote: Igor39
          There is a much stronger army that holds back the Russian army and saves Europe !!!
          APU is undoubtedly the most powerful army in the world, probably even more powerful than the Polish ...
          1. +21
            1 October 2015 18: 07
            And these reckless SuperVVS of Latvia in general will tear all! That would be them in Syria! ISIS would die in hysteria!
          2. The comment was deleted.
        2. The comment was deleted.
          1. +5
            1 October 2015 18: 43
            Quote: herruvim
            To disable an American commando, it is enough to pull a roll of toilet paper from his backpack
            Usually, in order to incapacitate an American soldier, he had to overcome his fire support and grab the adversary ’for buckle’, that is, to impose an open direct battle on him. to the last fighter. And they rotted in this fucking jungle 2 times faster than the Vietnam. But nonetheless, the resistance did not weaken when the evacuation started --- fun began, and before that the war was on an equal footing. The USA has extensive experience in war in the tropics and on the islands. You have to be very careful ..
            1. -9
              1 October 2015 19: 19
              Well, well, do not build a gun!
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. 0
          1 October 2015 23: 38
          urrraaaa! usa assigned us a place laughing Madhouse ..
      2. +4
        1 October 2015 18: 06
        Russia at the last ... So I think it's better! bully We will be calmer in Syria ...))))

        MIKHAN ... or I came up with something for myself, or your intonation of the quote should be read in the style of "Master Yoda" (Star Wars) ... 200%
      3. +1
        1 October 2015 18: 10
        most importantly, they can wage war only with the knowledge of a weak adversary, and the paper will endure ... and no matter what hat they drive in the information field, Berlin still took ours
    2. +3
      1 October 2015 17: 59
      here I would argue
      1. +16
        1 October 2015 18: 04
        Normally we rose, from a regional power, in a couple of days laughing
        1. +1
          1 October 2015 19: 43
          especially a torn economy bully
      2. jjj
        +3
        1 October 2015 18: 04
        Meanwhile, the Europeans are becoming more accommodating, and the ruble and oil are growing
    3. +5
      1 October 2015 18: 20
      Yes, on the first we are on the first ..
      You are wrong, in the first place the Ukrainian army, I personally saw what a drunken hog said it on TV ...
    4. +2
      1 October 2015 19: 06
      Quote: chuma_velikiy
      Yes, at the first, we are at the first ... they just didn’t understand there (or do not want to understand)
      Figures are important of course ... but most importantly EFFICIENCY !!!

      -------------------
      If banks began to deal with military ratings, then where is this world heading for? In this case, many of us can become experts in economics ... At least there are more vague formulations and chaotic processes than in other areas ...
    5. 0
      1 October 2015 19: 31
      yeah, we would still have to print money, like the Americans, so in general no one would catch us
    6. 0
      1 October 2015 23: 05
      They would write, but nobody will just let them do it, and if you drop deeply, then the amers have as many weapons as they declare gold reserves, when they consider not only theirs but plus the reserves of Europeans, and secondly most of it is only on paper or like brothers of Ukrainians are parsing)
      1. +2
        2 October 2015 06: 44
        And yet the American command and control system is an order of magnitude more progressive than ours. Plus electronics. Think about it: even in Afghanistan, in this asshole of Asia, every soldier has a tablet. Extremely effective reconnaissance from countless and highly technically advanced drones and satellites. Destruction of the enemy outside the affected area, which allows you to radically reduce losses with the same effectiveness. In an amicable way, we should learn from them. And then Catherine's approach "The women are still giving birth" somehow does not inspire. It even got to the point that the defense of Osovets is presented as a heroic deed, although in the mind it is just a useless sacrifice. It was necessary to hold out for the allotted four days and screw from there at full steam. Because the value of human life is the highest sacred and nothing can be higher than it. Only personal freedom and privacy are on a par with it.
  2. +8
    1 October 2015 17: 53
    This conclusion was made by the Swiss bank Credit Suisse
    Well, yes, the most competent authority ... winked
    1. +2
      1 October 2015 17: 55
      Porters ... they are like Swiss cheese ... (full of holes) ...
      1. +4
        1 October 2015 18: 04
        Quote: chuma_velikiy
        Porters ... they are like Swiss cheese ... (full of holes) ...
        - Yes, and with the smell of worn socks ... laughing
      2. +1
        1 October 2015 18: 04
        Yeah and a little moldy !! :))) in general, all these ratings are needed only to intimidate the intelligentsia, which is far from in the affairs of the army! And those who are aware of army life in the world will never show their trump card and will be dark horses, God forbid, of course, recognize them in business !!!
    2. +1
      1 October 2015 18: 03
      Quote: Alexej
      This conclusion was made by the Swiss bank Credit Suisse
      Well, yes, the most competent authority ... winked

      Especially in armaments ...

      And counting billions is a noble cause. Better to calculate the coefficient of efficiency.
      They have all the bases in these six hundred + lards and the Navy-breakthrough is included. Again, the F-35 is a dubious superiority with a bunch of reservations: if that, if this.
      They themselves calculated that with this money the Chinese spank a dozen of their 4 ++ fighters, which, although with heavy losses, will still reach the 35th.
    3. +4
      1 October 2015 19: 03
      Quote: Alexej
      Well, yes, the most competent authority ...

      Yeah, it wasn’t just me who was embarrassed that the ratings of the armies began to make up everyone and sundry. Now the banks. Who tomorrow? Laundries, real estate agencies, cleaning unions?
      Maybe I have paranoia, but I would always put the Germans after us. That's who knows how and loves to fight. It is not for nothing that it is us who are constantly pitted.
  3. +2
    1 October 2015 17: 55
    The SGA have not won a single war since 1945. All their "strength" is in PR.
    1. 0
      2 October 2015 09: 21
      Well, we, then what won after 45?)
  4. +3
    1 October 2015 17: 55
    Armata for 2 tanks will come down !!! and t-50 for 3 f-35 !!! laughing
    1. +3
      1 October 2015 19: 17
      Quote: kimyth1
      Armata for 2 tanks will come down !!! and t-50 for 3 f-35 !!!

      Armata for 2 tanks will come down !!!
      For which two tanks? Specify the characteristics.
      and t-50 for 3 f-35 !!!
      Feel free to multiply the number of our aircraft by three. And compare with the amount of fi-35. I also love to wave a saber, but not as much.
      1. 0
        1 October 2015 22: 31
        Mig-31 can safely be multiplied by 4-8 f-35, since, he will destroy them all. If you are not able to understand that in addition to quantity, quality and skill are also needed, then there is no need to argue. We have the strongest missile defense / air defense, the largest number of tactical weapons, the best electronic warfare weapons (they don’t shine there at all), we have 20+ thousand tanks (of which 3-4 thousand are T-90 and T-80), we have more MLRS systems, self-propelled guns and towed artillery, the United States has an advantage in only two types of aircraft, the Navy (surface fleet, parity submarines) and unmanned aircraft (this, by the way, is not long, we have tested two shock UAVs, medium and heavy) and parity in nuclear weapons.
        We are at least not weaker than the United States (and possibly the whole of NATO) and should be in the first place together, and then of course China.
  5. +5
    1 October 2015 17: 57
    By the way, the “strongest” army in Europe - the Ukrainian - did not enter the top 20 rating at all.
    ..And again, he’ll get drunk a lot ..
    1. 0
      1 October 2015 18: 20
      Quote: Tra-ta-ta
      By the way, the “strongest” army in Europe - the Ukrainian - did not enter the top 20 rating at all.
      ..And again, he’ll get drunk a lot ..
      The author is wrong - the Ukrainian army is the strongest, therefore, does not participate in the ratings, otherwise after the first place (Ukraine), the next would have to start from 20th (USA). smile
  6. 0
    1 October 2015 17: 58
    Well, you still need to see who comes first.
    In Ponte, maybe American, in fact, of course, ours !!!
    1. +1
      2 October 2015 09: 22
      facts to the studio laughing
  7. +1
    1 October 2015 18: 00
    Quote: chuma_velikiy
    Yes on the first we are on the first


    Never will the West put us first. And the USA really looks stronger in pieces of iron. But there is such a thing that you can’t count. The SPIRIT is called military. Here, then, in a completely different place are distributed.
  8. +2
    1 October 2015 18: 02
    And the janitor, Valia’s grandmother, claims that the most powerful army in the world is the army of Papua New Guinea! so who to believe me then ??? (joke)!
  9. 0
    1 October 2015 18: 02
    I do not agree. am The table does not indicate the number and consumption of diapers used by amers.
  10. +1
    1 October 2015 18: 04
    Isn’t it better for the bank to do its direct duties — to count money, and preferably not strangers?
    "The trouble is, if the pastry starts to wear the boots, and the shoemaker starts to wear the stove thresholds."
    I.A. Krylov
  11. 0
    1 October 2015 18: 07
    I don’t understand where they get their abrams from all 5500 pieces, including the first modifications with which they were going to fight; it’s not clear for a long time that the plant in Detroit doesn’t work; what they can oppose against 15000 or 20000 T-90 is not clear air support, I think nonsense also in general, some kind of pi ar american army
    1. +2
      2 October 2015 03: 09
      Quote: fairmen
      I don’t understand where they get their abrams from all 5500 pieces, including the first modifications with which they were going to fight; it’s not clear for a long time that the plant in Detroit doesn’t work; what they can oppose against 15000 or 20000 T-90 is not clear air support, I think nonsense also in general, some kind of pi ar american army

      To understand such things, you need to be at least a little interested in the issue, however, ignorance does not interfere with writing jingoistic comments negative
      Where did you get the 20000 T-90? wassat The main manufacturer of tanks of the "Abrams" family for a long time is the plant in Lima, pcs. Ohio (satellite image). A significant number of "Abrams", in addition to those that are operated, are stored at various storage bases. The largest is the ground storage base at Anniston.
    2. +1
      2 October 2015 09: 27
      Quote: fairmen
      15000 or 20000 T-90
      There are fewer than 2000 of them, and then, Russia has only 600 feel
  12. +2
    1 October 2015 18: 08
    US Armed Forces are by far the most powerful in the world.
    Yes, we do not doubt what
    WASHINGTON, October 1 - RIA Novosti. The US-led coalition forces on Wednesday dealt only one blow to the positions of Islamic State militants in Syria - the attack was carried out using an unmanned aerial vehicle. According to the central command of the coalition forces (CENTCOM), the attack was carried out in the vicinity of the village of Mara. As a result, two excavators were destroyed.

  13. +3
    1 October 2015 18: 08
    bullshit all these ratings
    the only true one is taking the capital of the enemy
    1. +3
      1 October 2015 18: 15
      Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
      bullshit all these ratings

      xoxl, who did not get into the 20-ku, also believe that all this is bullshit.
  14. +5
    1 October 2015 18: 08
    The authors, however, recognize that their research does not provide a complete and objective picture, since the index they use, for example, does not take into account the nuclear arsenals of states.
    And the mentality of people.
    1. +9
      1 October 2015 18: 17
      and so we can
  15. +4
    1 October 2015 18: 09
    The fourth line is Japan ))) ha ha don't tell my slippers))) wassat
    1. +2
      1 October 2015 18: 30
      in fact, their fleet is one of the strongest!
      1. 0
        1 October 2015 22: 53
        Yes, but the "Great Britons" are somehow dumb. And after all, the fleet, the same is not bad ... Then they bombed straight in advance)
  16. 0
    1 October 2015 18: 11
    Ratings ... We will not beat by rating and not by rating.

    We apply our Russian kung fu and all kirdyk. laughing

    And in Russian kung fu, what’s the main thing?

    Correctly. So that the shafts would not immediately break. laughing
  17. +1
    1 October 2015 18: 12
    The authors, however, acknowledge that their study does not provide a complete and objective picture.

    Doggy crap .... Come, dear guests ... compare the practice with theoretical calculations ... all the historical time the partners step on the same rake .... And get on the arrogant red face wassat
  18. +1
    1 October 2015 18: 13
    This conclusion was made by the Swiss bank Credit Suisse. The document also draws attention to the "gigantic military budget of the United States, which significantly exceeds the budgets of the defense ministries of all the other top ten countries combined." Last year, the Americans spent on defense amounted to $ 610 billion The bank of a neutral country decides which of the military is cooler. laughing If they are good bankers, let them calculate how the dollar collapses in a mess. fool
  19. +2
    1 October 2015 18: 13
    The main thing is that on the continent we are the first army. The rest is verbiage.
  20. +11
    1 October 2015 18: 13
    By the way, the “strongest” army in Europe - the Ukrainian - did not enter the top 20 rating at all.
    Trouble, sadness ..
  21. +1
    1 October 2015 18: 14
    Everything is so subjective in this world, half a month ago we could not get anywhere at all, and Poroshenko declared the Armed Forces of Ukraine the first in Europe. The first blow of the Russian Aerospace Forces pushed us in all ratings at once and I would not be surprised that now even the most sworn will want to be friends with us "friends"!
  22. +1
    1 October 2015 18: 14
    We are a gray horse, but our armored train is ... where it should be!
  23. +2
    1 October 2015 18: 17
    Damn, these economists, what are they thinking about themselves? Bankers determine the combat effectiveness of the army? what And, for example, some kind of "Army of Narnia" knocks at his door, with a grinder, then probably it will be the most combat-ready in the world, after, when the specific funding for a soldier is considered wassat
    1. 0
      1 October 2015 18: 35
      Even Joseph Vissarionovich said: money will run out - the war will end!
      1. 0
        1 October 2015 19: 50
        Quote: satelit24
        Even Joseph Vissarionovich said: money will run out - the war will end!

        When and where, bring a reference? War, of course, requires money, but often, when they ended, they fought, simply on credit. The USA, by the way, went to World War I on loans and didn’t fight, and when it sent its to the finals, it turned out that the army of the richest country was no good for anyone
  24. +1
    1 October 2015 18: 19
    We do not need a rating .... Because we are Russia!
    1. +1
      1 October 2015 19: 20
      The video shows our plans until 2014. But taking into account import substitution and low oil prices, some positions (mainly in the fleet) will have to be adjusted - until 2020, much will not be ready. But most think it will be done. In any case, the fact that by 2020 the army and navy of the Russian Federation will be significantly stronger than now is not in doubt.
    2. +1
      2 October 2015 09: 39
      Cool, another groovy clip from Mikhan - 8 Boreev ?! - 6 maximum! 20 non-strategic - this is 6 Varshavyanka, a couple of Lad and 3-4 Ash trees with luck! 35 corvettes and 15 frigates are generally a fool, especially in corvettes wassat
  25. +3
    1 October 2015 18: 21
    Old, but in the subject. And this is only Aunt Zina, estimate who she raised .. winked Eh ratings ..
    1. +1
      1 October 2015 20: 09
      Quote: Barracuda
      Baracuda (6) Today, 18: 21 New
      Old, but in the subject. And this is only Aunt Zina, estimate whom she brought up .. Eh ratings ..

      Smartly lol
  26. +3
    1 October 2015 18: 30
    They have not seen our women yet. And they indulge in ratings. And who is the judge?
  27. 0
    1 October 2015 18: 32
    By the way, the “strongest” army in Europe - the Ukrainian - did not enter the top 20 rating at all.


    Mayhem! Again Petruha was lowered, now also the Swiss bank! So Petruha has not yet departed from the UN, now it’s just like a tailspin with grief.

    Just a laugh. wassat wassat wassat drinks
  28. +1
    1 October 2015 18: 34
    Banks are involved in army ratings? :) Wow, already registered from surprise)))))
  29. +2
    1 October 2015 18: 34
    Objectively, you can laugh as much as you like, but the Amer army is really the most powerful army in the world, huge amounts of money are spent on the military budget, the army is constantly fighting! I don't give a damn about anyone, but we have experience, and we have, apart from the recent conflict in Georgia and the collapse in Chechnya ( when they couldn’t even win, but stupidly bought the Kadyrov’s hand clan) and nothing to brag about!
    1. +2
      1 October 2015 18: 47
      It was not pleasant, as it were, but you have to admit that we drove 300000 tons of soldiers through Iraq and Afghanistan! Three hundred thousandth army shelled is a serious force! - whoever said that! Although, here, - a lot! - generals in pink glasses!
      1. +1
        1 October 2015 19: 02
        It was not pleasant, as it were, but you have to admit that we drove 300000 tons of soldiers through Iraq and Afghanistan! Three hundred thousandth army shelled is a serious force! - whoever said that! Although, here, - a lot! - generals in pink glasses!

        Of course, I agree with you, but their military operations cannot be compared with ours ... they mainly work at a distance in direct combat clashes ...
  30. 0
    1 October 2015 18: 35
    Naglosaksov moved to 9th place. This is closer to the truth.
  31. 0
    1 October 2015 18: 36
    Their ratings ... Yes, even the twentieth! The main thing is that it does not "rust" when you need to give someone on this very rating.
  32. 0
    1 October 2015 18: 38
    Damn!
    Well, isn't it idiocy when usurers appear in the role of "major military experts" ...?!
    To attach some significance to this nonsense, to put it mildly, of non-professionals - you yourself become an idiot.
    "Trouble, if the cobbler starts the ovens ...!"
  33. 0
    1 October 2015 18: 42
    Our and American generals decided to find out whose special forces are better. The Americans put up their "fur seals", and ours looked for their special forces - they did not find anyone: some in Chechnya, others in Yugoslavia, who is where. Then they found strong convicts in the camps, put up a team of them. Two teams came together on a desert island, neutral soil. The generals are located on the shore, and there is a fight in the bushes. After half an hour, the whole beaten, tattered "cat" falls out of the bushes. American general to him: -Well, what, we won? Paratrooper: - No, so far only answered for the goats. anekdotov.net
    1. 0
      1 October 2015 18: 50
      beard with kilometer feel
  34. +3
    1 October 2015 18: 42
    Ukrokhokhly on another site imagines themselves in the 9-th place in the world (or rather on the 8-m, Russia they generally have on the 10-th page of the rating), because dumbheads think that the abbreviation UK is Ukraine. lol
  35. +1
    1 October 2015 18: 57
    strange rating, China at the moment is certainly armed no worse, and the industrial and financial potential is many times greater.
  36. 0
    1 October 2015 19: 02
    Pancake. Well, the whole west is crazy about ratings. You would think that there’s nothing more to do. Tryndets ... fool
  37. 0
    1 October 2015 19: 43
    Yes, fighting spirit is difficult to rank, and they don’t see it. And what we don’t see is not there. laughing
    Let further rated))
  38. 0
    1 October 2015 19: 52
    "The strength of concrete does not matter when there is no willpower"(Aloizych, examining the fortifications surrendered without a fight in the Sudetenland)
    "The defenses of a fortress are determined not by the height and thickness of the walls, but by the courage of its defenders"(Genghis Khan)
    "Of the two armies, as a rule, the one that goes into battle is inspired by the gods (= has a high morale) "(Xenophon)
  39. 0
    1 October 2015 19: 54
    Yes, already tired of these ratings! Already, banks and army ratings are ..?
  40. 0
    1 October 2015 20: 03

    The analysis conducted by the bank’s specialists “testifies to the military superiority of the United States in the ability to wage conventional war in comparison with its closest rivals,” the document says.

    In addition, "in the technical arsenal, including including 13900 aircraft and 920 helicopters, 20 aircraft carriers and 72 submarines, the Pentagon is significantly superior to its closest pursuers," the authors of the study write.
    Hmmm, the Swiss bank and do such analytics belay
    Oh yes. In fact, only them
    The document also draws attention to “gigantic military budget of the United Stateswhich significantly exceeds the budgets of the ministries of defense of all the other top ten countries combined. ” Last year's Americans spent on defense $ 610 billion
    Who about what, and the Swiss about cheese wassat
  41. 0
    1 October 2015 20: 13
    Who in the first place can only show war. Napoleon and Hitler also thought they were in the first place ..
  42. 0
    1 October 2015 20: 53
    Our army is no stranger, crumbling the very-most! Hitler, Napoleon, the Crusaders, Mamai ... They killed everyone. God willing, and bury these.
  43. +1
    1 October 2015 21: 03
    By the way, the “strongest” army in Europe - the Ukrainian - did not enter the top 20 rating at all.

    But yak drink wink
  44. 0
    1 October 2015 22: 33
    Dear, it seems to me alone, or in fact, these articles with "ratings" are already simply "FUCKED" !!!
    Correct if that is not so.
  45. 0
    1 October 2015 23: 05
    Well, in general, as a statistical rating, then everything is correct. The Americans, no matter how more units of aviation, navy, active personnel, and the budget are huge. It's just not clear how the Japanese were pushed to 4th place, they still stomp and stomp to India, and the 5th place is already reserved by Ukraine - they used to say according to TSN ..
  46. 0
    1 October 2015 23: 37
    The authors are stupid people. How could one think of evaluating the German army weaker than the Polish, Pakistani and Taiwanese?
  47. +1
    1 October 2015 23: 48
    The rating is of course delusional. Well, this is such a razvlekuha type of dispute between neighbors "whose daughter-in-law is more economic" the exact answer only after the massacre.
  48. +1
    2 October 2015 03: 44
    And there is a rating of armies that have repeatedly crushed the armies that were in the ratings of the "Best Armies" on the first lines, of course in different periods of time laughing
  49. +1
    2 October 2015 04: 14
    These inferior ones can only falsely measure the pindo and eurofantics that, at a minimum, is measured by the richest earth on the planet that is kept from capturing for millennia of continuous cold and hot wars.
  50. +1
    2 October 2015 04: 40
    Well, how, then, how does a Swiss expert bank try to judge things very, very distant for him, I will certainly take into account ...
  51. 0
    2 October 2015 04: 59
    Banks ranking the armed forces is bullshit! They probably translated everything into dollar equivalent efficiency. If we take into account the intangible components in this rating: fortitude, love for the Motherland, the ability to endure “hardships and hardships” and other intangible incentives, then the amers before us will be like reaching the moon on a tractor!!!
  52. 0
    2 October 2015 05: 15
    I looked at the rating and something seemed unaccounted for in it, then it dawned on me that the number of sapper blades was not there) and therefore the rating is bullshit
  53. 0
    2 October 2015 07: 52
    Loafers determine all the places, however...
  54. 0
    2 October 2015 09: 34
    Quote: Weyland
    "The strength of concrete does not matter when there is no willpower"(Aloizych, examining the fortifications surrendered without a fight in the Sudetenland)
    "The defenses of a fortress are determined not by the height and thickness of the walls, but by the courage of its defenders"(Genghis Khan)
    "Of the two armies, as a rule, the one that goes into battle is inspired by the gods (= has a high morale) "(Xenophon)

    This is just about IS. Only they will not emerge victorious. And the morale of an amateur will not help when a professional works on it.
  55. 0
    2 October 2015 10: 59
    Quote: Alexnder
    Well, you still need to see who comes first.
    In Ponte, maybe American, in fact, of course, ours !!!

    But I really don’t want to check this... Since this dispute is insoluble in principle, as soon as one side starts winning, the other will strike with nuclear weapons, in principle, I personally am not afraid of death, but I really feel sorry for my children, so hi will be in first place!!! hi
  56. 0
    4 October 2015 21: 04
    After the effectiveness of striking the jackals and training OUR military p.i.n.d.o.s.y. in fact. And all the ratings even more so "This conclusion has been made Swiss bank Credit Suisse in a study entitled "The End of Globalization or a More Multipolar World." Well, don't tell me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!