Military Review

NI: Su-34 - "the most advanced Russian fighter-bomber"

90
In the US media, there were reports that the Pentagon allegedly confirmed the arrival in Syria of at least four Russian Su-34 fighters to participate in the operation. In this regard, National Interest columnist Dave Majumdar conducted an analysis of the combat qualities of the aircraft. His article leads RIA News.




Madjumdar recalled that "Su-34 was designed in the last decade of Soviet power and became an improved version of the Su-27."

According to him, "at the moment," fullback "(the name of the Su-34 according to NATO classification) is the most advanced Russian fighter-bomber."

“The Su-34 was developed primarily as a replacement for the outdated Su-24 fighter. Just like the Su-24, the seats in the Su-34 are located on the same line. Unlike the Su-24, the Su-34 is equipped with an air-to-air self-defense system, ”the analyst writes.

Equipping air-to-air missiles is one of the main advantages of the aircraft.

"In addition to short-range missiles P-73 for conducting close air combat with an offset from the main direction, the Su-34 is equipped with long-range missiles of air-to-air type P-77 with radar guidance with a range of 700 miles (about 1130 km), ”the article notes.

The location systems, the author continues, “also allow one to“ see ”the threat approaching from behind and warn the crew of this.”

To the advantages of the fighter, Majumdar also took his electron-optical fire control system.

The observer was surprised that “Russian designers have provided crew comfort uncharacteristic for other aircraft: there is space in the cockpit behind the pilots' seats, allowing crew members to stand up and even warm up.”

"For Russia, the ability to deploy the Su-34 and other aircraft gives a chance to test their latest weapons in operational-military conditions," the author concludes.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
90 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. rosarioagro
    rosarioagro 1 October 2015 10: 34 New
    17
    "The Su-34 was developed primarily as a replacement for the obsolete Su-24 fighter ..."

    Is that an even-numbered fighter?
    1. Tatarus
      Tatarus 1 October 2015 10: 43 New
      11
      Quote: rosarioagro
      Is that an even-numbered fighter?


      What about the SU-30?
      1. hedgehog in the fog
        hedgehog in the fog 1 October 2015 10: 48 New
        35
        yes, the agitation attack went to the full, in a month we will learn from America that in Syria there are submarines with vertical take-off on atomic traction and intergalactic bombers with plasma guns.
        1. podpolkovnik
          podpolkovnik 1 October 2015 12: 30 New
          +6
          Quote: hedgehog in the fog
          intergalactic plasma guns
          1. Uncle VasyaSayapin
            Uncle VasyaSayapin 1 October 2015 14: 12 New
            +3
            Bandit technology. With this apparatus, only grain from farmers can be harvested from the field. laughing It's worse than wagons at full speed in the dark to open.
            1. supertiger21
              supertiger21 1 October 2015 22: 15 New
              +1
              The capabilities of the Su-34 are very impressive good ! I would very much like that this strike aircraft was in service not only with us, but also exported. soldier
      2. tronin.maxim
        tronin.maxim 1 October 2015 10: 49 New
        -20
        The SU-34 is a good aircraft, but it’s time to modernize it, and not only a dozen of them have been armed with the military, though it’s not at all for a long time. Maybe I was mistaken in something, tell me what updates this device has for today?
        1. solovey
          solovey 1 October 2015 10: 58 New
          24
          Yes, they probably made a mistake. Su-24 wanted to write. It has already been modernized.
          By the way, yesterday, it was the Su-24 that struck in Syria !!!
          1. Boatsman_Palych
            Boatsman_Palych 1 October 2015 11: 36 New
            10
            No, they were not mistaken. The warriors believe that our troops threw another 6 SU-34 the other day through Iran and Iraq, in addition to 12 SU-24 at Latakia airbase. An error in the text about the TTX R-77 - its radius is 80-110 km, apparently when translating illiterate they mixed up its radius with the radius of action of the SU-34 itself. Although its range is much larger wink
            1. Col.
              Col. 1 October 2015 13: 02 New
              11
              Quote: Boatswain_Palych
              Error in the text about TTX P-77 - its radius is 80-110 km


              In fact, use the characteristic called "range" in relation to missiles illiterate! fool Aircraft, helicopters, etc. have a radius of action, that is, a technique that, roughly speaking, flies "there and back." And missiles usually don't return lol , therefore, the characteristic "launch range" is adopted for them.
              1. Sterlya
                Sterlya 1 October 2015 13: 52 New
                +3
                Quote: Colonel
                Quote: Boatswain_Palych
                Error in the text about TTX P-77 - its radius is 80-110 km


                In fact, use the characteristic called "range" in relation to missiles illiterate! fool Aircraft, helicopters, etc. have a radius of action, that is, a technique that, roughly speaking, flies "there and back." And missiles usually don't return lol , therefore, the characteristic "launch range" is adopted for them.

                Yeah. Missile is not a boomerang laughing
                1. supertiger21
                  supertiger21 1 October 2015 22: 24 New
                  +1
                  In various sources, the numbers about the combat load of the Su-34 vary greatly. Some write that it carries up to 8000 kg, in others up to 12000 kg - I can’t understand where the exact numbers are! Experts, who knows? request
              2. Uncle VasyaSayapin
                Uncle VasyaSayapin 1 October 2015 14: 06 New
                +3
                Article is transferable. By radius is meant the distance from the center (plane) to the conditional circle whose radius is the launch range. Anecdote: "Vasily Ivanovich - white. Take Petka a grenade, drive away the whites. -Removed Vasily Ivanovich. -Well, put the grenade in place."
          2. The comment was deleted.
        2. maiman61
          maiman61 1 October 2015 11: 07 New
          12
          I am sure. that all weapons of the Russian group in Syria have at least been modernized. It makes no sense to drag scrap metal there and disgrace the country. Yes, and next to the United States and Israel, you never know what.
          1. dmi.pris
            dmi.pris 1 October 2015 12: 20 New
            +5
            If only people underwent “modernization” in the General Staff and took into account errors in the use of aviation in 2008 in South Ossetia ...
            Quote: maiman61
            I am sure. that all weapons of the Russian group in Syria have at least been modernized. It makes no sense to drag scrap metal there and disgrace the country. Yes, and next to the United States and Israel, you never know what.
        3. subbtin.725
          subbtin.725 1 October 2015 11: 43 New
          13
          Quote: tronin.maxim
          Yesнth unit onвone ... mаto taunt

          Where is it taught?

          Maybe I'm wrong about something

          And there is.
          1. pavel_SPB
            pavel_SPB 1 October 2015 11: 50 New
            +6
            as well as upgrade)
          2. spiriolla-45
            spiriolla-45 1 October 2015 12: 10 New
            +6
            And this, apparently, is the result of educational reform. Wait, whether there will be more.
      3. kil 31
        kil 31 1 October 2015 11: 23 New
        +5
        Quote: Tatarus
        Quote: rosarioagro
        Is that an even-numbered fighter?


        What about the SU-30?

        There is an odd SU25 attack aircraft. They have long had a little letter, which means. "Interest" you just need to know the performance characteristics of aircraft. Experts x ... you.
        1. Alexey RA
          Alexey RA 1 October 2015 13: 50 New
          +2
          Quote: Kil 31
          There is an odd SU25 attack aircraft. They have long had little literal meaning.

          You can also recall the MiG-27 (clean drummer) and Tu-95.
          Or a Tu-128 fighter. smile
    2. neri73-r
      neri73-r 1 October 2015 10: 46 New
      14
      Yes, a strong and informative analysis !!!!! Although, ......... for a Western reader, this can be a lot of information ... wassat
      1. vladimir_krm
        vladimir_krm 1 October 2015 12: 49 New
        +3
        Especially this:

        long-range air-to-air missiles R-77 with radar guidance with a radius of 700 miles (about 1130 km), ”the article says.

        Mistaken wrong ...
    3. Col.
      Col. 1 October 2015 10: 58 New
      +3
      Quote: rosarioagro
      Is that an even-numbered fighter?

      The American classification classifies the Su-24 as a tactical fighter.
      1. Thronekeeper
        Thronekeeper 1 October 2015 13: 09 New
        +3
        It just won’t surprise me. They have both the Su-24 Finser - on F - means fighter, and the Su-25 Frogfoot. And “Rafal”, which was originally an IS, allegedly an “attack bomber,” or as the F / A-18 “Assalt” - fire support, like Thunderbolt.
        The R-77 range was touched when the hypersonic Zircon (Yakhont / Bramos-2) has a more modest range of 800-900 km. Probably a black spot, 130km. 130km for the R-77M1 and 170-200km for the R-77PD is something suitable for the brain when the AIM-120D does not squeeze 170 without violating the laws of physics, even falling from the height of the F-15 to the supersonic Tu-22 M2,3, 10 per 7km. The earth is bastard, round, and will enter the atmosphere’s layers early dense, so that with MXNUMX it will either melt or brake recoursebut usually both at once. The 130km limit for its engine and design, straightforwardly equipping the Air Force (they had an idea with AIM-150, but did not grow together) was not fate. Amraam will not turn great sorcery into Phonics, so I needed to lather my own propaganda of the Russian wunderwafer, who even conduct nuclear bombing with the NBC laughing
        But more offended by the Russian "Murzilka". The R-27ER / ET on it is the airborne defense system, and the Kh-59 and Kh-58U are Air-to-Air. Where are the "Kryptons" X-31A / PD at 200km that fly at an altitude on the forward path to the M4?
      2. Vladimir 1964
        Vladimir 1964 1 October 2015 13: 22 New
        +1
        Quote: Colonel
        The American classification classifies the Su-24 as a fighter.


        Sorry, Andrey, but I’ll correct, the American classification classifies the SU-24 as “fighter-bombers”.

        Something like this is more accurate. hi
        1. Col.
          Col. 1 October 2015 14: 02 New
          10
          Quote: Vladimir 1964
          Sorry, Andrey, but I’ll correct, the American classification classifies the SU-24 as “fighter-bombers”.

          No, Vladimir, you’ll excuse me, but for 25 years I "oversaw" the US Armed Forces and NATO and I know this classification thoroughly. They have no "fighter-bombers." That is, in unofficial literature and everyday speech, they can use it, but according to the OFFICIAL classification they are divided into bomber (B), attack aircraft (A), air defense fighters and tactical fighters (F), anti-submarine (S), transport (C), tankers (K), patrol (P), EW aircraft (Q), helicopters (N), etc. There are intermediate "classes" - F / A, SH, etc. The only exception is FB -111, but it is still classified by the Americans themselves as a bomber. So Su-24 in their "version" is a tactical fighter, albeit purely formally, literally, if you want. Find at least a Jane guide for any year. Only not the one that is offered on the Internet, but a real London edition. If you don’t find it, I can give it a look for a while, a very good, complete, most authoritative guide in the world! But in our work we used more reference books and summaries of the GRU, and “Jains” - so, “for the common development” ... yes
          1. ancient
            ancient 1 October 2015 15: 26 New
            +5
            Quote: Colonel
            but according to the OFFICIAL classification, they divide LA into



            Report on 5 points! +! drinks soldier
    4. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 1 October 2015 11: 30 New
      10
      The combat load is really approaching the Tu-22. By the way, there was news about six Su-34s in Syria, and now they are writing about four ...
      1. Colonel
        Colonel 1 October 2015 13: 07 New
        +1
        Quote: Lord of the Sith
        there was news about six Su-34s in Syria, and now they are writing about four ...

        Today specified - a link.
      2. ancient
        ancient 1 October 2015 15: 30 New
        +5
        Quote: Lord of the Sith
        The combat load is really approaching the Tu-22.


        No ... this is "information" from airspeels from the media "he has a maximum of 8 tons (for operation), and for the Tu-22M it is 8 tons .. this is ..." seeds "(if everything can be hung on the hedgehogs, unless of course hang 500M54) wink
        Well, Beckfire’s tactical radius is larger wink
      3. goose
        goose 1 October 2015 17: 20 New
        0
        Anyway, you can’t compare it with the Tu-22M, it will not drag the Su-34 to such a range a large load, although the efficiency is undoubtedly higher. Those. Su-34 did not reach a full-fledged semi-strategic bomber in terms of capabilities. But effective as a tactical one.
    5. Scraptor
      Scraptor 1 October 2015 12: 17 New
      +4
      Majumdar learned to write in English and now it makes him ashamed of America lol
      It used to be just disgusting.
    6. vladimir_krm
      vladimir_krm 1 October 2015 12: 43 New
      +2
      And An-225 Mriya? :)
    7. goose
      goose 1 October 2015 17: 14 New
      0
      In addition, a pair of R-24M could be suspended on the Su-60. It was impossible to call him unarmed. This is not a cannon in the tail of the transporter.
    8. Nick
      Nick 2 October 2015 09: 59 New
      0
      Quote: rosarioagro
      Is that an even-numbered fighter?

      What bad omen? Then the question arises - for whom? lol
  2. DobryAAH
    DobryAAH 1 October 2015 10: 34 New
    +5
    A test in the fighting conditions of a duckling.
  3. Good_Taxist
    Good_Taxist 1 October 2015 10: 34 New
    +4
    “For Russia, the opportunity to deploy Su-34 and other aircraft gives a chance to test their latest weapons in operational-military conditions”

    Already bzdat striped !!! And this is just the beginning ....
    Berries ahead!
    1. Maxom75
      Maxom75 1 October 2015 11: 16 New
      +3
      There is another plus in the fact that our Air Force attacks ISIS, ISIS captured a lot of US military equipment. By striking ISIS, one can work out the technology of destroying modern Western models of military equipment in one. So the Yankees squealed.
      1. ancient
        ancient 1 October 2015 15: 33 New
        +3
        Quote: Maxom75
        By striking ISIS, one can work out the technology of destroying modern Western models of military equipment in one.


        1. It depends on what you mean by "modern Western models of military equipment" wassat
        2. What is the difference between the technique (and not the technology wink ) destruction .. well let’s say an armored column on the march .. which consists of new Humves or old Willis? request
      2. Col.
        Col. 1 October 2015 15: 52 New
        0
        Quote: Maxom75
        one can work out the technology of destruction of modern Western models of military equipment.


        I can not resist the amendment. "Technology" is a civilian word. In military science and terminology there are concepts of “methods of combat operations”, “tactics” of various types of operations (reconnaissance, target designation, striking at various targets, landing, laying mines, etc.). In this (your) case, this tactics striking against small-sized, including armored, targets.
  4. jjj
    jjj 1 October 2015 10: 35 New
    +9
    Something this American "Interest" began to show an unhealthy interest in Russian weapons
    1. hydrox
      hydrox 1 October 2015 10: 50 New
      +2
      Just healthy, really hefty!
      They are trying to recognize the enemy "in person" (when they meet (if they remain alive by this time))!
    2. Altona
      Altona 1 October 2015 10: 51 New
      +1
      Quote: jjj
      Something this American "Interest" began to show an unhealthy interest in Russian weapons

      -----------------
      In the United States, many people are interested in weapons, including Russian weapons ... In the United States, there are private owners of tanks, aircraft, self-propelled howitzers and other weapons, as collectors mainly ... But the samples are usually valid and naturally demilitarized, unable to shoot. ..
    3. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 1 October 2015 13: 51 New
      0
      Quote: jjj
      Something this American "Interest" began to show an unhealthy interest in Russian weapons

      Calls Antires
      Your technical progress:
      How you sow rutabaga there -
      With skin or not? ..
  5. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 1 October 2015 10: 35 New
    27
    Let's see how he behaves in real hostilities .... hi
    I am sure a good car!
  6. Cormorants
    Cormorants 1 October 2015 10: 35 New
    +6
    Yes sir! Crush ISIS!
  7. Tummyr
    Tummyr 1 October 2015 10: 36 New
    +8
    “The Su-34 was designed primarily as a replacement for the obsolete Su-24 fighter.”

    I did not know that 24 was a fighter.
    1. Etric
      Etric 1 October 2015 10: 39 New
      11
      Which browser such and data)
    2. Col.
      Col. 1 October 2015 10: 59 New
      +6
      Quote: Tumyr
      I did not know that 24 was a fighter.

      American the classification classifies the Su-24 as a fighter. They have neither front-line bombers, nor ISAs (except for the FB-111), they have IA, AA defense and ShA.
      1. Artyom
        Artyom 1 October 2015 11: 12 New
        -5
        in terms of combat load, the Su-34 is almost like the Tu-22, only the combat radius is less.
        1. ancient
          ancient 1 October 2015 15: 35 New
          +5
          Quote: Artyom
          the combat load of the Su-34 is almost like a Tu-22


          We flew on the Tu-22-x .. times such "bold statements" wink
          1. Artyom
            Artyom 1 October 2015 17: 12 New
            -3
            go online and compare the characteristics, "wise guy"!
      2. supertiger21
        supertiger21 1 October 2015 22: 26 New
        0
        Quote: Colonel
        They have neither front-line bombers, nor IBA (except for FB-111),


        F-15E "Strike Eagle" in your opinion is not a fighter-bomber ?! wink
        1. Col.
          Col. 2 October 2015 09: 26 New
          0
          Quote: supertiger21
          F-15E "Strike Eagle" in your opinion is not a fighter-bomber ?!


          Guys, you’re like children, I swear ... I already wrote 10 that, according to CASH there is NO IBA, but there are TACTICAL FIGHTERS. F-xnumx in OUR classifications of course a fighter bomber, and they have a tactical fighter (and there are also "air defense fighters"). And they transfer this classification to all aircraft of all other countries. Well, they are stupid, okay?
  8. Yarik
    Yarik 1 October 2015 10: 36 New
    +1
    run it in battle Very, very necessary!
  9. Paul_
    Paul_ 1 October 2015 10: 37 New
    52
    A little off topic
    1. Koshak
      Koshak 1 October 2015 12: 06 New
      +1
      Junta turnip cards. On ukrosayt stench is. They do not know what to expect from Russia. It seems that yesterday they were not going to meet in Syria, but today ISIS is hrenachat. And suddenly tomorrow they will be targeted at their supreme parliament.
  10. fox21h
    fox21h 1 October 2015 10: 37 New
    +5
    34 drying in my opinion is insurance against all sorts of surprises from our "partners", you can also add su 30, so to speak, so that you would not rock the boat
  11. meriem1
    meriem1 1 October 2015 10: 39 New
    +1
    Why not try it ?. To use any chance to increase opportunities will not be only a mindless one. Well, the tan will carefully monitor everything that happens. But nothing . Without false modesty, Our technology is not worth worrying about.
  12. Tra-ta-ta
    Tra-ta-ta 1 October 2015 10: 40 New
    +5
    ..something many inaccuracies in the article / translation ..
    And the plane is cool!
  13. KAPITANUS
    KAPITANUS 1 October 2015 10: 40 New
    22
    The test site is open. The survey involved 80.000 ISIS members, then 60.000, 30.000, 3.000, the latter said that he just wanted to go home.
  14. DobryAAH
    DobryAAH 1 October 2015 10: 47 New
    18
    Look to the end, laugh.
  15. Engineer
    Engineer 1 October 2015 10: 47 New
    11
    What does everyone write - to experience, to experience? Su-34 participated in an operation to force peace in Georgia. Moreover, Georgia had air defense and quite serious. Those. much more real combat conditions than now in Syria. They tested the car. The car is beautiful, it is not necessary to prove to her that it is better than the Su-24, this is already understandable. And I am glad that our pilots risk their lives precisely on such, most protected machines, doing their duty.
  16. Barakuda
    Barakuda 1 October 2015 10: 53 New
    +2
    space is provided for crew members to stand and even stretch themselves. ”
    And even to go out of necessity. But in the article blunders .. sad
  17. DobryAAH
    DobryAAH 1 October 2015 10: 57 New
    -8

    Consequences of pinpoint strikes Russian Air Force

    A bunch of young bearded, Igilovites.
    1. Koshak
      Koshak 1 October 2015 12: 18 New
      +5
      Quote: Good AAAH
      Consequences of pinpoint strikes Russian Air Force

      A bunch of young bearded, Igilovites.

      Prior to this, the video was posted with the caption: "The strike of French aviation ...". You can write anything you want. The Western media have already calculated the number of civilians affected by the Russian Air Force raid before our planes landed.
      1. DobryAAH
        DobryAAH 1 October 2015 14: 01 New
        0
        I did not find on the pipe about France.
  18. veksha50
    veksha50 1 October 2015 10: 58 New
    0
    "He considers air-to-air missiles to be one of the main advantages of an airplane" ...

    Once again confirms that we are ready to strike not only at ground targets, but also to guard the airspace of Syria ...
  19. propolsky
    propolsky 1 October 2015 10: 59 New
    +3
    There is a tile for heating food and a toilet. This is a service: from human weakness to inhuman strength.
  20. Stirbjorn
    Stirbjorn 1 October 2015 11: 05 New
    +1
    Again, Dave Majumdar, our shoot has ripened everywhere. When will the article be published, with the "analysis of the fighting qualities" of Dave Majumdar as a military expert. And it may turn out that he, like our Feldengrauer or whatever it is, is shorter from the Novaya Gazeta - well, the one who studied molecular biology for up to 40 years, and in old age fell into insanity and decided to become a military analyst fellow
  21. vell.65
    vell.65 1 October 2015 11: 08 New
    -1
    Quote: meriem1
    Why not try it ?. To use any chance to increase opportunities will not be only a mindless one. Well, the tan will carefully monitor everything that happens. But nothing . Without false modesty, Our technology is not worth worrying about.

    I think everything new will pass the test, maybe there will be enough space and time for the t-50.
  22. Mareman Vasilich
    Mareman Vasilich 1 October 2015 11: 09 New
    +1
    Quote: Good AAAH
    The consequences of a point strike by the Russian Air Force in Syria


    No one has hit Syria, of ours, at least. Attacks were inflicted on the positions of militants and terrorists who invaded Syria. Think what you write.
    1. DobryAAH
      DobryAAH 1 October 2015 11: 14 New
      0
      Calm down dear, do not dig into the words, delve into the essence.
      If this trash is not destroyed, then it will come to us. I agree 100% with our CDF.
      This is the name of the video on the tube.
  23. DobryAAH
    DobryAAH 1 October 2015 11: 09 New
    +1
    Russian Air Force hit the Syria building / Russian Air Force bombed Syria
    1. Horst78
      Horst78 1 October 2015 19: 40 New
      0
      How did they get the name of Allah to use sad Allah will "reward them according to their desires," I hope.
  24. Executer
    Executer 1 October 2015 11: 10 New
    0
    Something on all the filming of the airplane one keel, and 34 like two keel?
    1. goose
      goose 1 October 2015 17: 30 New
      0
      Quote: Executer
      Something on all the filming of the airplane one keel, and 34 like two keel?

      In the frames of the Su-24M everywhere. No there Su-34. The "square" body, thin wings of variable geometry, rotated at 90 degrees, one keel, and other less noticeable details, everything fits.
  25. roskot
    roskot 1 October 2015 11: 42 New
    0
    Created on the basis of the su-27, for delivering point strikes.
    What he did very well in Syria.
  26. Rokossovsky
    Rokossovsky 1 October 2015 11: 42 New
    0
    with a range of 700 miles

    belay Is he even out of his mind?
  27. fycom
    fycom 1 October 2015 11: 43 New
    0
    Kashin writes here that the two thirty-fourth “drying” had already been lost: 0 Soon, according to the liberals, we will lose all 70 of the VKS.
    Although it may have been brought down, who knows the truth. But I do not want to believe in this: otherwise the Su-34 is somehow vulnerable or something.
    1. solohan
      solohan 1 October 2015 12: 32 New
      0
      and another Tu-22 was shot down and only one person stinks, the rest refer to him am
  28. ARES623
    ARES623 1 October 2015 11: 46 New
    +3
    “At the moment, the fullback (the name of the Su-34 according to NATO classification) is the most advanced Russian fighter-bomber”
    Analysis of the characteristics of the Su-34 - so-so, for American housewives. Smiled the name for the classification of NATO - Fullback. Translated from Basurman to human - full - full, full, back - back, back, in the end it turns out - "full ass" ("full ass"). Obviously, NATO is discouraged by the presence of such an aircraft in the Russian Air Force (now the VKS).
    1. Col.
      Col. 1 October 2015 11: 52 New
      +7
      Quote: ARES623
      Smiled NATO classification name - Fullback


      I will explain. To the Americans, to a light bulb, what should we call our plane, if only the name begins with the corresponding letter: B - bombers, A-attack aircraft, F - fighters, N - helicopters ... They have such a system. Therefore, the names come up "from the bulldozer." I know that for sure. And the correct translation of the word Fullback in this case is "protector".
      1. ARES623
        ARES623 2 October 2015 09: 05 New
        0
        Quote: Colonel
        I will explain. To the Americans, to a light bulb, what should we call our plane, if only the name begins with the corresponding letter: B - bombers, A-attack aircraft, F - fighters, N - helicopters ... They have such a system. Therefore, the names come up "from the bulldozer." I know that for sure. And the correct translation of the word Fullback in this case is "protector".

        For those who are completely serious, I explain - I am kidding and do not pretend to be scientific in my research. NATO studied the weapons designation system back in the early 80s, in the "tactical training" discipline in the "probable enemy army" section. Regarding the accuracy of the translation, I think it is also understandable. The dictionaries provide generally accepted correspondence of the terms of one language to another. But there is a mental feature of the arrangement of life priorities. If you delve into the field of stable linguistic forms, you will find in one people more expressions from the spiritual or emotional, and from the other - more from the material. The topic is deep, not in the trend of VO. In my case, it's just a pun. For seriousness I put +.
    2. nizrum
      nizrum 1 October 2015 12: 07 New
      -1
      Rather, "Full Return."
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. Aleksey_K
      Aleksey_K 1 October 2015 12: 11 New
      0
      Quote: ARES623
      Translated from Basurman to human - full - full, full, back - back, back, in the end it turns out - "full ass" ("full ass"). Obviously, NATO is discouraged by the presence of such an aircraft in the Russian Air Force (now the VKS).

      You, in principle, correctly translated, although it translates as a “defender”. They put in the word protector the meaning of invincibility of the protector and this is an awesome name for Americans. This is their synonym for "protector" and "full ass." So this is a "complete ass" for those who have not yet hidden from the Su-34.
  29. Ze Kot
    Ze Kot 1 October 2015 11: 48 New
    0
    Quote: Executer
    Something on all the filming of the airplane one keel, and 34 like two keel?


    So this is the 24th.
  30. tolyasik0577
    tolyasik0577 1 October 2015 12: 13 New
    0
    Envy please silently.
  31. Maxom75
    Maxom75 1 October 2015 12: 15 New
    +2
    Saudi Arabia requires Russia to immediately stop the military operation in Syria. About it, reports Reuters with reference to Al-Arabia.

    As the representative of Saudi Arabia Abdullah al-Muallimi said at a UN meeting on the night of October 1, Riyadh expressed "deep concern" about the actions of Russia. According to Saudi Arabia, airstrikes were inflicted on the territory on which there were no militants (banned in Russia by the court) of the “Islamic State”, and led to civilian casualties.

    “As for countries that want to join the fight against ISIS terrorists, [we believe that] they do not have the right to do this while they themselves support terrorism of the Syrian regime,” al-Muallimi said.
    Anyone else have questions about sponsors of terrorists?)))
    1. kartalovkolya
      kartalovkolya 1 October 2015 12: 35 New
      0
      I advise you to read, what did the UN secretariat answer to Lavrov’s request for sources of information on this issue? Again the media and the Internet source, and this is just an information war against Russia! The statements of this “Saudi” are a cry of fear, and what if they “miss” and shy away from Riyadh? Although there’s something to give them horns, here they are! Well, these "former cameleers" do not learn anything!
      1. Maxom75
        Maxom75 1 October 2015 12: 58 New
        0
        At one time, one of our ambassadors for hitting us like US bases was covering us, answered simply: If you know, exercises with missile launches take place periodically. Typically, rockets fly to the Kura training ground, but the electronics can become cramped and the rocket will fly to Doha. After this remark, all questions to our ambassador from the side of the bitter Arab were gone.
  32. Samarin
    Samarin 1 October 2015 12: 16 New
    +1
    NI: Su-34 - "the most advanced Russian fighter-bomber"

    thanks, Cap!
  33. atamankko
    atamankko 1 October 2015 12: 21 New
    -1
    Strength of mind must be added to the excellent aircraft TTD
    and flight training for those who operate it.
  34. Aroma77
    Aroma77 1 October 2015 12: 23 New
    -1
    The article actually made a mistake. It was not about SU-34, but about 4 SU-30 MS.
  35. kartalovkolya
    kartalovkolya 1 October 2015 12: 39 New
    +1
    We will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of our Dryers when summarizing the operation, when the last ISIS soldier will "drop their hooves" and then based on how much and what ammunition was spent on eliminating the entire IG! In short, "chickens in the fall count!"
  36. Romeohihnic
    Romeohihnic 1 October 2015 12: 48 New
    +1
    Ours are flying. Rusks will make a rustle there
  37. oldav
    oldav 1 October 2015 13: 03 New
    0
    Until the moderates are destroyed with the igil, there is no point in fighting. And then the Su-24 can be left to the Syrians as a gum of help.
  38. gladysheff2010
    gladysheff2010 1 October 2015 14: 01 New
    0
    Quote: Good AAAH
    A bunch of young bearded, Igilovites.

    Well, where is it that you see "children, women and the elderly", sheer thugs from unlimited adolescence!
    Saudi Arabia demanded that Russia stop the military operation in Syria, as stated by Saudi diplomat Abdullah al-Muallimi. According to him, Russian planes did not strike at places where IS militants were clustered.
    This is not a peaceful wedding for you to bomb! It’s Russian professional intelligence pilots working under professional and competent command, catch HELLO soldier !
  39. Algetxnumx
    Algetxnumx 1 October 2015 14: 38 New
    0
    Quote: Maxom75
    led to civilian casualties.

    But it’s nothing that the Saudis sent a whole wedding to Allah, more than 100 dead, let their filthy mouths better be covered, or they can even fly to them.
    1. Scraptor
      Scraptor 1 October 2015 14: 50 New
      0
      Moreover, they have Washhabism of the kind that is accepted as extremist in Russia by the state government.
  40. VP
    VP 1 October 2015 15: 05 New
    0
    The rams from NI managed to call the SU-24 a fighter.
    Here what for to quote this garbage dump?
    1. Col.
      Col. 1 October 2015 15: 22 New
      +1
      Quote: VP
      The rams from NI managed to call the SU-24 a fighter.
      Here what for to quote this garbage dump?


      Before you freak out and call people names, read the comments carefully. I specifically for such nervous types FOUR times duplicated the explanation.
      1. VP
        VP 1 October 2015 18: 52 New
        0
        In none of the explanations there is an answer to the question what are you for (we are on the “you”, as I understand it, you really want this and I do not mind - we are not in real life) in general, it was dragged here.
        National interest is a yellowish resource that places all garbage.
        Can you remember at least one competent and non-poppy article?
        Ah, well, yes, how did I forget - superanalytics about the top 10 most terrifying weapons of Russia ...
        "Call people" - is it about employees of a resource that I called garbage?
  41. Spitfire
    Spitfire 1 October 2015 19: 11 New
    0
    Quote: Spitfire
    Quote: sanya.vorodis
    The author of the article, Dave Majumdar, is known for his “revelations”!
    In the next article, the Yak-130 will be called a bomber?
    A "people" hawala ...

    What about translators? The same "experts"?


    Why not name something? Most of the front-line bombers of the Second World War will surpass 3 tons in combat load, not to mention speed ... And his training avionics will allow simulating the behavior of any aircraft ;-)


    The people, for which we minus something without explanation? Am I wrong or forgot to put a smiley? ;-)
  42. Filxnumx
    Filxnumx 4 October 2015 08: 43 New
    0
    Quote: Artyom
    go online and compare the characteristics, "wise guy"!

    Show me the place on the Internet where it says that the maximum combat load of the Su-34 is 24 tons (TU-22M3 in the version of the front-line bomber)? Or 18 tons (in the version of the missile carrier with three X-22)?