NI: Su-34 - "the most advanced Russian fighter-bomber"

90
In the US media, there were reports that the Pentagon allegedly confirmed the arrival in Syria of at least four Russian Su-34 fighters to participate in the operation. In this regard, National Interest columnist Dave Majumdar conducted an analysis of the combat qualities of the aircraft. His article leads RIA News.



Madjumdar recalled that "Su-34 was designed in the last decade of Soviet power and became an improved version of the Su-27."

According to him, "at the moment," fullback "(the name of the Su-34 according to NATO classification) is the most advanced Russian fighter-bomber."

“The Su-34 was developed primarily as a replacement for the outdated Su-24 fighter. Just like the Su-24, the seats in the Su-34 are located on the same line. Unlike the Su-24, the Su-34 is equipped with an air-to-air self-defense system, ”the analyst writes.

Equipping air-to-air missiles is one of the main advantages of the aircraft.

"In addition to short-range missiles P-73 for conducting close air combat with an offset from the main direction, the Su-34 is equipped with long-range missiles of air-to-air type P-77 with radar guidance with a range of 700 miles (about 1130 km), ”the article notes.

The location systems, the author continues, “also allow one to“ see ”the threat approaching from behind and warn the crew of this.”

To the advantages of the fighter, Majumdar also took his electron-optical fire control system.

The observer was surprised that “Russian designers have provided crew comfort uncharacteristic for other aircraft: there is space in the cockpit behind the pilots' seats, allowing crew members to stand up and even warm up.”

"For Russia, the ability to deploy the Su-34 and other aircraft gives a chance to test their latest weapons in operational-military conditions," the author concludes.
  • http://www.globallookpress.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

90 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +17
    1 October 2015 10: 34
    "The Su-34 was developed primarily as a replacement for the outdated Su-24 fighter ..."

    Is that an even-numbered fighter?
    1. +11
      1 October 2015 10: 43
      Quote: rosarioagro
      Is that an even-numbered fighter?


      What about the SU-30?
      1. +35
        1 October 2015 10: 48
        yes, the agitation attack went to the full, in a month we will learn from America that in Syria there are submarines with vertical take-off on atomic traction and intergalactic bombers with plasma guns.
        1. +6
          1 October 2015 12: 30
          Quote: hedgehog in the fog
          intergalactic plasma guns
          1. +3
            1 October 2015 14: 12
            Bandit technology. With this apparatus, only grain from farmers can be harvested from the field. laughing It's worse than wagons at full speed in the dark to open.
            1. +1
              1 October 2015 22: 15
              The capabilities of the Su-34 are very impressive good ! I would very much like that this strike aircraft was in service not only with us, but also exported. soldier
      2. -20
        1 October 2015 10: 49
        The SU-34 is a good aircraft, but it’s time to modernize it, and not only a dozen of them have been armed with the military, though it’s not at all for a long time. Maybe I was mistaken in something, tell me what updates this device has for today?
        1. +24
          1 October 2015 10: 58
          Yes, they probably made a mistake. Su-24 wanted to write. It has already been modernized.
          By the way, yesterday, it was the Su-24 that struck in Syria !!!
          1. +10
            1 October 2015 11: 36
            No, they were not mistaken. The warriors believe that our troops threw another 6 SU-34 the other day through Iran and Iraq, in addition to 12 SU-24 at Latakia airbase. An error in the text about the TTX R-77 - its radius is 80-110 km, apparently when translating illiterate they mixed up its radius with the radius of action of the SU-34 itself. Although its range is much larger wink
            1. +11
              1 October 2015 13: 02
              Quote: Boatswain_Palych
              Error in the text about TTX P-77 - its radius is 80-110 km


              Actually use a characteristic called "range" when applied to missiles illiterate! fool Airplanes, helicopters, etc., have a radius of action, that is, equipment that, roughly speaking, flies "back and forth." And rockets don't usually come back lol , therefore, the characteristic "launch range" is adopted for them.
              1. +3
                1 October 2015 13: 52
                Quote: Colonel
                Quote: Boatswain_Palych
                Error in the text about TTX P-77 - its radius is 80-110 km


                Actually use a characteristic called "range" when applied to missiles illiterate! fool Airplanes, helicopters, etc., have a radius of action, that is, equipment that, roughly speaking, flies "back and forth." And rockets don't usually come back lol , therefore, the characteristic "launch range" is adopted for them.

                Yeah. Missile is not a boomerang laughing
                1. +1
                  1 October 2015 22: 24
                  In various sources, the numbers about the combat load of the Su-34 vary greatly. Some write that it carries up to 8000 kg, in others up to 12000 kg - I can’t understand where the exact numbers are! Experts, who knows? request
              2. +3
                1 October 2015 14: 06
                Translated article. The radius means the distance from the center (aircraft) to the conventional circle, the radius of which is the launch range. Anecdote: "Vasily Ivanovich - white. Take Petka a grenade, drive off the whites. - Vasily Ivanovich drove away. - Well then put the grenade in place."
          2. The comment was deleted.
        2. +12
          1 October 2015 11: 07
          I am sure. that all weapons of the Russian group in Syria have at least been modernized. It makes no sense to drag scrap metal there and disgrace the country. Yes, and next to the United States and Israel, you never know what.
          1. +5
            1 October 2015 12: 20
            If only the person in the General Staff underwent "modernization" and the mistakes in the use of aviation in 2008 in South Ossetia were taken into account ...
            Quote: maiman61
            I am sure. that all weapons of the Russian group in Syria have at least been modernized. It makes no sense to drag scrap metal there and disgrace the country. Yes, and next to the United States and Israel, you never know what.
        3. +13
          1 October 2015 11: 43
          Quote: tronin.maxim
          Yesнth unit onвone ... mаto taunt

          Where is it taught?

          Maybe I'm wrong about something

          And there is.
          1. +6
            1 October 2015 11: 50
            as well as upgrade)
          2. +6
            1 October 2015 12: 10
            And this, apparently, is the result of educational reform. Wait, whether there will be more.
      3. +5
        1 October 2015 11: 23
        Quote: Tatarus
        Quote: rosarioagro
        Is that an even-numbered fighter?


        What about the SU-30?

        There is an attack aircraft with an odd SU25. They have long had little letter, which means. "Interest" needs elementary knowledge of the aircraft performance characteristics. Experts x ... you.
        1. +2
          1 October 2015 13: 50
          Quote: keel 31
          There is an odd SU25 attack aircraft. They have long had little literal meaning.

          You can also recall the MiG-27 (clean drummer) and Tu-95.
          Or a Tu-128 fighter. smile
    2. +14
      1 October 2015 10: 46
      Yes, a strong and informative analysis !!!!! Although, ......... for a Western reader, this can be a lot of information ... wassat
      1. +3
        1 October 2015 12: 49
        Especially this:

        long-range missiles of the R-77 air-to-air type with radar guidance with a range of 700 miles (about 1130 km), ”the article says.

        Mistaken wrong ...
    3. +3
      1 October 2015 10: 58
      Quote: rosarioagro
      Is that an even-numbered fighter?

      The American classification classifies the Su-24 as a tactical fighter.
      1. +3
        1 October 2015 13: 09
        This just won't surprise me. They have both the Su-24 "Finser" - the "F" means "fighter", and the Su-25 "Frogfoot". And "Rafale", which was originally an IB, that is "strike bomber", or as F / A-18 "Assalt" - fire support, like Thunderbolt.
        Touched by the range of the P-77, when the hypersonic Zircon (Yakhont / Brahmos-2) has a modest range - 800-900 km. Probably a mistake, 130 km. 130 km for the R-77M1 and 170-200 km for the R-77PD is something suitable for the brain, when the AIM-120D does not squeeze out 170, without violating the laws of physics, even falling from the F-15 flight altitude on the supersonic Tu-22 M2,3, 10 by 7 km. The earth is scum, round, and will enter the dense layers of the atmosphere early, so that at MXNUMX it will either melt or slow down recourse, but usually - both at once. 130 km is the limit for its engine and design, it was not destiny to equip the Air Force with a direct flow (they had an idea with the AIM-150, but did not grow together). Amraam will not turn great witchcraft into Fonix, so it was necessary to wash up its own propaganda by the Russian wunderwolf, who at least carry out nuclear bombing with the SBS laughing
        But the Russian "Murzilka" offended more. R-27ER / ET on it RVZ, and the Kh-59 and Kh-58U became "Air-Air". Where are the "Kryptons" X-31A / PD at 200 km, which fly at an altitude on a straight-through line on the M4?
      2. +1
        1 October 2015 13: 22
        Quote: Colonel
        The American classification classifies the Su-24 as a fighter.


        Sorry, Andrei, but I'll correct it, the American classification classifies the SU-24 as "fighter-bombers".

        Something like this is more accurate. hi
        1. +10
          1 October 2015 14: 02
          Quote: Vladimir 1964
          Sorry, Andrei, but I'll correct it, the American classification classifies the SU-24 as "fighter-bombers".

          No, Vladimir, you will excuse me, but I have been "in charge" of the US Armed Forces and NATO for 25 years and I know this classification thoroughly. They don't have any "fighter-bombers". That is, in unofficial literature and everyday speech, they can use it, but according to the OFFICIAL classification, aircraft are divided into bombers (B), attack aircraft (A), air defense fighters and tactical fighters (F), anti-submarine (S), transport (C), tankers (K), patrol (P), electronic warfare aircraft (Q), helicopters (H), etc. There are intermediate "classes" - F / A, SH, etc. The ONLY exception is the FB-111, but the Americans themselves classify it as a bomber anyway. So the Su-24 according to their "version" is a tactical fighter, albeit purely formally, literally, if you like. Find at least a Jane reference for any year. Only not the one that is offered on the Internet, but a real London edition. If you don’t find it, I can let you familiarize yourself with it, a very good, complete, most authoritative reference book in the world! But in our work we used more reference books and summaries of the GRU, and "Jaina" - so, "for general development" ... Yes
          1. +5
            1 October 2015 15: 26
            Quote: Colonel
            but according to the OFFICIAL classification, they divide LA into



            Report on 5 points! +! drinks soldier
    4. +10
      1 October 2015 11: 30
      The combat load is really approaching the Tu-22. By the way, there was news about six Su-34s in Syria, and now they are writing about four ...
      1. +1
        1 October 2015 13: 07
        Quote: Sith Lord
        there was news about six Su-34s in Syria, and now they are writing about four ...

        Today specified - a link.
      2. +5
        1 October 2015 15: 30
        Quote: Sith Lord
        The combat load is really approaching the Tu-22.


        No ... this is "information" from air specials from the media "he has a maximum of 8 tons (for the system), and for the Tu-22M 8 tons ... these are ..." seeds "(if everything can be hung on the" hedgehogs "from the center section, unless of course hang 500M54) wink
        Well, Beckfire’s tactical radius is larger wink
      3. 0
        1 October 2015 17: 20
        Anyway, you can’t compare it with the Tu-22M, it will not drag the Su-34 to such a range a large load, although the efficiency is undoubtedly higher. Those. Su-34 did not reach a full-fledged semi-strategic bomber in terms of capabilities. But effective as a tactical one.
    5. +4
      1 October 2015 12: 17
      Majumdar learned to write in English and now it makes him ashamed of America lol
      It used to be just disgusting.
    6. +2
      1 October 2015 12: 43
      And An-225 Mriya? :)
    7. 0
      1 October 2015 17: 14
      In addition, a pair of R-24M could be suspended on the Su-60. It was impossible to call him unarmed. This is not a cannon in the tail of the transporter.
    8. 0
      2 October 2015 09: 59
      Quote: rosarioagro
      Is that an even-numbered fighter?

      What bad omen? Then the question arises - for whom? lol
  2. +5
    1 October 2015 10: 34
    A test in the fighting conditions of a duckling.
  3. +4
    1 October 2015 10: 34
    “For Russia, the opportunity to deploy Su-34 and other aircraft gives a chance to test their latest weapons in operational-military conditions”

    Already bzdat striped !!! And this is just the beginning ....
    Berries ahead!
    1. +3
      1 October 2015 11: 16
      There is another plus in the fact that our Air Force attacks ISIS, ISIS captured a lot of US military equipment. By striking ISIS, one can work out the technology of destroying modern Western models of military equipment in one. So the Yankees squealed.
      1. +3
        1 October 2015 15: 33
        Quote: Maxom75
        By striking ISIS, one can work out the technology of destroying modern Western models of military equipment in one.


        1. It depends on what you mean by "modern Western models of military equipment" wassat
        2. What is the difference between the technique (and not the technology wink ) destruction .. well let’s say an armored column on the march .. which consists of new Humves or old Willis? request
      2. 0
        1 October 2015 15: 52
        Quote: Maxom75
        one can work out the technology of destruction of modern Western models of military equipment.


        I cannot refrain from making an amendment. "Technology" is a civil word. In military science and terminology there are the concepts of "methods of combat", "tactical techniques" of various types of actions (reconnaissance, target designation, strikes against various targets, landing, laying mines, etc.). In this (your) case it is tactics striking against small-sized, including armored, targets.
  4. jjj
    +9
    1 October 2015 10: 35
    Something this American "Interest" began to show an unhealthy interest in Russian weapons
    1. +2
      1 October 2015 10: 50
      Just healthy, really hefty!
      They are trying to recognize the enemy "by sight" (when they will meet (if they will survive by this time))!
    2. +1
      1 October 2015 10: 51
      Quote: jjj
      Something this American "Interest" began to show an unhealthy interest in Russian weapons

      -----------------
      In the United States, many people are interested in weapons, including Russian weapons ... In the United States, there are private owners of tanks, aircraft, self-propelled howitzers and other weapons, as collectors mainly ... But the samples are usually valid and naturally demilitarized, unable to shoot. ..
    3. 0
      1 October 2015 13: 51
      Quote: jjj
      Something this American "Interest" began to show an unhealthy interest in Russian weapons

      Calls Antires
      Your technical progress:
      How you sow rutabaga there -
      With skin or not? ..
  5. +27
    1 October 2015 10: 35
    Let's see how he behaves in real hostilities .... hi
    I am sure a good car!
  6. +6
    1 October 2015 10: 35
    Yes sir! Crush ISIS!
  7. +8
    1 October 2015 10: 36
    "The Su-34 was developed primarily as a replacement for the outdated Su-24 fighter."

    I did not know that 24 was a fighter.
    1. +11
      1 October 2015 10: 39
      Which browser such and data)
    2. +6
      1 October 2015 10: 59
      Quote: Tumyr
      I did not know that 24 was a fighter.

      American the classification classifies the Su-24 as a fighter. They have neither front-line bombers, nor ISAs (except for the FB-111), they have IA, AA defense and ShA.
      1. -5
        1 October 2015 11: 12
        in terms of combat load, the Su-34 is almost like the Tu-22, only the combat radius is less.
        1. +5
          1 October 2015 15: 35
          Quote: Artyom
          the combat load of the Su-34 is almost like a Tu-22


          We flew the Tu-22 ... once such "bold statements" wink
          1. -3
            1 October 2015 17: 12
            go online and compare the characteristics, "smart guy"!
      2. 0
        1 October 2015 22: 26
        Quote: Colonel
        They have neither front-line bombers, nor IBA (except for FB-111),


        F-15E "Strike Eagle" in your opinion not a fighter-bomber ?! wink
        1. 0
          2 October 2015 09: 26
          Quote: supertiger21
          F-15E "Strike Eagle" in your opinion not a fighter-bomber ?!


          Guys, you’re like children, I swear ... I already wrote 10 that, according to CASH there is NO IBA, but there are TACTICAL FIGHTERS. F-xnumx in OUR classification, of course, a fighter bomber, and they have a tactical fighter (and there are also "air defense fighters"). And they carry this classification to all aircraft of all other countries. Well, they are stupid, okay?
  8. +1
    1 October 2015 10: 36
    run it in battle Very, very necessary!
  9. +52
    1 October 2015 10: 37
    A little off topic
    1. +1
      1 October 2015 12: 06
      Junta turnip cards. On ukrosayt stench is. They do not know what to expect from Russia. It seems that yesterday they were not going to meet in Syria, but today ISIS is hrenachat. And suddenly tomorrow they will be targeted at their supreme parliament.
  10. +5
    1 October 2015 10: 37
    34 drying in my opinion is insurance against any surprises from our "partners", you can also add su 30 there, so to speak, so that you don't rock the boat
  11. +1
    1 October 2015 10: 39
    Why not try it ?. To use any chance to increase opportunities will not be only a mindless one. Well, the tan will carefully monitor everything that happens. But nothing . Without false modesty, Our technology is not worth worrying about.
  12. +5
    1 October 2015 10: 40
    ..something many inaccuracies in the article / translation ..
    And the plane is cool!
  13. +22
    1 October 2015 10: 40
    The test site is open. The survey involved 80.000 ISIS members, then 60.000, 30.000, 3.000, the latter said that he just wanted to go home.
  14. +18
    1 October 2015 10: 47
    Look to the end, laugh.
  15. +11
    1 October 2015 10: 47
    What does everyone write - to experience, to experience? Su-34 participated in an operation to force peace in Georgia. Moreover, Georgia had air defense and quite serious. Those. much more real combat conditions than now in Syria. They tested the car. The car is beautiful, it is not necessary to prove to her that it is better than the Su-24, this is already understandable. And I am glad that our pilots risk their lives precisely on such, most protected machines, doing their duty.
  16. +2
    1 October 2015 10: 53
    space is provided for crew members to stand and even stretch themselves. ”
    And even to go out of necessity. But in the article blunders .. sad
  17. -8
    1 October 2015 10: 57

    Consequences of pinpoint strikes Russian Air Force

    A bunch of young bearded, Igilovites.
    1. +5
      1 October 2015 12: 18
      Quote: Good AAAH
      Consequences of pinpoint strikes Russian Air Force

      A bunch of young bearded, Igilovites.

      Prior to that, the video was posted with the caption: "French air strike ...". You can write anything you want. Western media have already counted the number of civilians affected by the RF Air Force raid before our planes landed.
      1. 0
        1 October 2015 14: 01
        I did not find on the pipe about France.
  18. 0
    1 October 2015 10: 58
    "Equipping with air-to-air missiles, he considers one of the main advantages of the aircraft" ...

    Once again confirms that we are ready to strike not only at ground targets, but also to guard the airspace of Syria ...
  19. +3
    1 October 2015 10: 59
    There is a tile for heating food and a toilet. This is a service: from human weakness to inhuman strength.
  20. +1
    1 October 2015 11: 05
    Again, Dave Majumdar, our shot is ripe everywhere. When will the article be published, with the "analysis of fighting qualities" of Dave Majumdar as a military expert. Otherwise, it may turn out that he is like our Feldengrauer or whatever it is, with Novaya Gazeta it is shorter - well, the one that until 40 years old was engaged in molecular biology, and in his old age fell into insanity and decided to become a military analyst fellow
  21. -1
    1 October 2015 11: 08
    Quote: meriem1
    Why not try it ?. To use any chance to increase opportunities will not be only a mindless one. Well, the tan will carefully monitor everything that happens. But nothing . Without false modesty, Our technology is not worth worrying about.

    I think everything new will pass the test, maybe there will be enough space and time for the t-50.
  22. +1
    1 October 2015 11: 09
    Quote: Good AAAH
    The consequences of a point strike by the Russian Air Force in Syria


    No one has hit Syria, of ours, at least. Attacks were inflicted on the positions of militants and terrorists who invaded Syria. Think what you write.
    1. 0
      1 October 2015 11: 14
      Calm down dear, do not dig into the words, delve into the essence.
      If this trash is not destroyed, then it will come to us. I agree 100% with our CDF.
      This is the name of the video on the tube.
  23. +1
    1 October 2015 11: 09
    Russian Air Force hit the Syria building / Russian Air Force bombed Syria
    1. 0
      1 October 2015 19: 40
      How did they get the name of Allah to use sad Allah will "reward them" for this, I hope.
  24. 0
    1 October 2015 11: 10
    Something on all the filming of the airplane one keel, and 34 like two keel?
    1. 0
      1 October 2015 17: 30
      Quote: Executer
      Something on all the filming of the airplane one keel, and 34 like two keel?

      The Su-24M is everywhere in the footage. There is no Su-34. "Square" body, thin wings of variable geometry, rotated at 90 degrees, one keel, and other less noticeable details, everything converges.
  25. 0
    1 October 2015 11: 42
    Created on the basis of the su-27, for delivering point strikes.
    What he did very well in Syria.
  26. 0
    1 October 2015 11: 42
    with a range of 700 miles

    belay Is he even out of his mind?
  27. 0
    1 October 2015 11: 43
    Kashin writes here that they have already lost two and thirty-fourths of "drying": 0 Soon, according to the liberals, we will lose all 70 members of the VKS.
    Although it may have been brought down, who knows the truth. But I do not want to believe in this: otherwise the Su-34 is somehow vulnerable or something.
    1. 0
      1 October 2015 12: 32
      and another Tu-22 was shot down and only one person stinks, the rest refer to him am
  28. +3
    1 October 2015 11: 46
    "At the moment" fullback "(the name of the Su-34 according to NATO classification) is the most advanced Russian fighter-bomber"
    The analysis of the characteristics of the Su-34 is so-so for American housewives. Smiled at the name according to NATO classification - Fullback. Translated from Basurmansky to human - full - full, full, back - ass, rear, in the end it turns out - "full ass" ("full ass"). Obviously NATO is discouraged by the presence of such an aircraft in the Russian Air Force (now the Aerospace Forces).
    1. +7
      1 October 2015 11: 52
      Quote: ARES623
      Smiled NATO classification name - Fullback


      Let me explain. Americans do not care what to call our plane, if only the name starts with the appropriate letter: B - bombers, A - attack aircraft, F - fighters, H - helicopters ... Their system is like that. Therefore, the names come up "from the bulldozer." I know this for sure. And the correct translation of the word Fullback in this case is "defender".
      1. 0
        2 October 2015 09: 05
        Quote: Colonel
        Let me explain. Americans do not care what to call our plane, if only the name starts with the appropriate letter: B - bombers, A - attack aircraft, F - fighters, H - helicopters ... Their system is like that. Therefore, the names come up "from the bulldozer." I know this for sure. And the correct translation of the word Fullback in this case is "defender".

        For those who are completely serious, I explain - I'm kidding and do not pretend to be scientific in my research. He studied NATO's weapon designation system back in the early 80s, in the discipline "tactical training" in the section "armies of a potential enemy." As for the reliability of the translation, I think it's also clear. Dictionaries contain generally accepted correspondences of terms from one language to another. But there is a mental feature of life priorities. If you delve into the area of ​​stable linguistic forms, you will find in one people more expressions from the spiritual or emotional area, while in the other - more from the material. The topic is deep, not in VO trend. In my case, just a play on words. For the seriousness of intentions I put +.
    2. -1
      1 October 2015 12: 07
      Rather, "Full return".
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. 0
      1 October 2015 12: 11
      Quote: ARES623
      Translated from Basurmansky to human - full - full, full, back - ass, rear, in the end it turns out - "full ass" ("full ass"). Obviously NATO is discouraged by the presence of such an aircraft in the Russian Air Force (now the Aerospace Forces).

      You, in principle, translated correctly, although it is translated as "defender". They put in the word defender the meaning of the invincibility of the defender, and this is a terrifying name for Americans. This is synonymous with "defender" and "full ass". So this is a "complete ass" for those who have not yet hidden from the Su-34.
  29. 0
    1 October 2015 11: 48
    Quote: Executer
    Something on all the filming of the airplane one keel, and 34 like two keel?


    So this is the 24th.
  30. 0
    1 October 2015 12: 13
    Envy please silently.
  31. +2
    1 October 2015 12: 15
    Saudi Arabia requires Russia to immediately stop the military operation in Syria. About it, reports Reuters with reference to Al-Arabia.

    As the representative of Saudi Arabia Abdullah al-Muallimi said at a UN meeting on the night of October 1, Riyadh expressed "deep concern" about the actions of Russia. According to Saudi Arabia, airstrikes were inflicted on the territory on which there were no militants (banned in Russia by the court) of the “Islamic State”, and led to civilian casualties.

    “As for countries that want to join the fight against ISIS terrorists, [we believe that] they do not have the right to do this while they themselves support terrorism of the Syrian regime,” al-Muallimi said.
    Anyone else have questions about sponsors of terrorists?)))
    1. 0
      1 October 2015 12: 35
      I advise you to read what the UN secretariat replied to Lavrov's request for sources of information on this issue? Again the media and the Internet source, and this is just an information war against Russia! The statements of this "Saudi" are a cry of fear, what if they "miss" and shy away from Riyadh? Although there is something to give them horns for, so they are oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Well, these "former camel drivers" do not learn anything!
      1. 0
        1 October 2015 12: 58
        At one time, one of our ambassadors for hitting us like US bases was covering us, answered simply: If you know, exercises with missile launches take place periodically. Typically, rockets fly to the Kura training ground, but the electronics can become cramped and the rocket will fly to Doha. After this remark, all questions to our ambassador from the side of the bitter Arab were gone.
  32. +1
    1 October 2015 12: 16
    NI: Su-34 - "the most advanced Russian fighter-bomber"

    thanks, Cap!
  33. -1
    1 October 2015 12: 21
    Strength of mind must be added to the excellent aircraft TTD
    and flight training for those who operate it.
  34. -1
    1 October 2015 12: 23
    The article actually made a mistake. It was not about SU-34, but about 4 SU-30 MS.
  35. +1
    1 October 2015 12: 39
    We will discuss the merits and demerits of our Sushki when summing up the results of the operation, when the last ISIS member will "throw away his hooves" and then based on how much and what ammunition was spent on the elimination of the entire IS! In short, "chickens are counted in the fall"!
  36. +1
    1 October 2015 12: 48
    Ours are flying. Rusks will make a rustle there
  37. 0
    1 October 2015 13: 03
    Until the moderates are destroyed with the igil, there is no point in fighting. And then the Su-24 can be left to the Syrians as a gum of help.
  38. 0
    1 October 2015 14: 01
    Quote: Good AAAH
    A bunch of young bearded, Igilovites.

    Well, where you can see "children, women and the elderly", sheer thugs from uncut adolescence!
    Saudi Arabia demanded that Russia stop the military operation in Syria, as stated by Saudi diplomat Abdullah al-Muallimi. According to him, Russian planes did not strike at places where IS militants were clustered.
    This is not a peaceful wedding for you to bomb! It’s Russian professional intelligence pilots working under professional and competent command, catch HELLO soldier !
  39. 0
    1 October 2015 14: 38
    Quote: Maxom75
    led to civilian casualties.

    But it’s nothing that the Saudis sent a whole wedding to Allah, more than 100 dead, let their filthy mouths better be covered, or they can even fly to them.
    1. 0
      1 October 2015 14: 50
      Moreover, they have Washhabism of the kind that is accepted as extremist in Russia by the state government.
  40. VP
    0
    1 October 2015 15: 05
    The rams from NI managed to call the SU-24 a fighter.
    Here what for to quote this garbage dump?
    1. +1
      1 October 2015 15: 22
      Quote: VP
      The rams from NI managed to call the SU-24 a fighter.
      Here what for to quote this garbage dump?


      Before you freak out and call people names, read the comments carefully. I specifically for such nervous types FOUR times duplicated the explanation.
      1. VP
        0
        1 October 2015 18: 52
        In none of the explanations is there an answer to the question for what you are (we are on "you", as I understand it, you really want this, but I do not mind - we are not in real life) in general it brought it here.
        National interest is a yellowish resource that places all garbage.
        Can you remember at least one competent and non-poppy article?
        Ah, well, yes, how did I forget - superanalytics about the top 10 most terrifying weapons of Russia ...
        "Calling people" is about the employees of the resource that I called garbage?
  41. 0
    1 October 2015 19: 11
    Quote: Spitfire
    Quote: sanya.vorodis
    The author of the article - Dave Majumdar - is known for his "revelations"!
    In the next article, the Yak-130 will be called a bomber?
    And the "people" hawala ...

    And what about translators? Are they the same "specialists"?


    Why not name something? Most of the front-line bombers of the Second World War will surpass 3 tons in combat load, not to mention speed ... And his training avionics will allow simulating the behavior of any aircraft ;-)


    The people, for which we minus something without explanation? Am I wrong or forgot to put a smiley? ;-)
  42. 0
    4 October 2015 08: 43
    Quote: Artyom
    go online and compare the characteristics, "smart guy"!

    Show me the place on the Internet where it says that the maximum combat load of the Su-34 is 24 tons (TU-22M3 in the version of the front-line bomber)? Or 18 tons (in the version of the missile carrier with three X-22)?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"