SAM "Buk-M2E" on a wheeled chassis MZKT-6922

22


Concern air defense "Almaz-Antey" - the leading Russian developer and manufacturer of systems and air defense systems. I want to acquaint the readers of my blog with one of the newest developments of "Almaz-Antey" - the Buk-M2E air defense system on the MZKT-6922 wheeled chassis.

Buk-M2E anti-aircraft missile system is designed to destroy tactical and strategic aircraft aviation, helicopters, cruise missiles and other aerodynamic flying objects in the entire range of their possible use, tactical ballistic and aircraft missiles, guided by air bombs in conditions of intense radio-electronic and fire countermeasures of the enemy, as well as shelling of surface and ground radio-contrast targets

Performance characteristics

The range of destruction of aerodynamic targets, km:
maximum - 45
minimum - 3
Height of destruction of aerodynamic targets, km
maximum - 25
minimum - 0,015
Range of defeat, km:
tactical ballistic missiles - 20
cruise missiles at height 100 m - 20
The maximum speed of the hit aerodynamic targets, m / s - 830
Maximum speed of the hit ballistic missiles, m / s - 1200
The number of simultaneously fired targets - up to 24
The probability of hitting targets with one rocket:
tactical aircraft and helicopters 0,9 – 0.95
tactical ballistic missiles 0,6 – 0,7

1.



2.



3.



4.



5.



6.



7.



8.



9.



10.



11.



12.



13.



14.



15.

Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    4 October 2015 02: 31
    The complex is notable, and as I understand it, the right one. The question is, how many MO will buy for the needs of our army, and whether there will be something really new like this complex in the near future, and not a modernization version of the already young system.
    1. +2
      4 October 2015 06: 23
      There is already a Buk-4M, with 8 missiles it is essentially a new complex and the missiles are in the TC
      1. +6
        4 October 2015 08: 51
        Quote: 31rus
        There is already a Buk-4M, with 8 missiles it is essentially a new complex and the missiles are in the TC


        Typo, you wanted to write Buk-M3 probably. And there are 6 pieces of missiles in the shopping mall on a self-propelled fire installation, and 12 pieces for a launch and loading machine.
        1. +8
          4 October 2015 11: 23
          Well, here’s your PZM SAM Buk-M3
          1. +1
            4 October 2015 14: 11
            Good machine!
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. +3
      4 October 2015 19: 19
      Quote: NEXUS
      The question is, how much MO will purchase for the needs of our army


      Answer, Dear NEXUS. Most likely nothing. According to the Almaz-Antey air defense concern itself, this wheeled version of the 2nd Buk, intended for export, hence the letter "E" in the name. And if you believe the manufacturer, the development is supposedly purely proactive.

      Well, something like this. Yes hi
  2. 0
    4 October 2015 11: 14
    at the time it came, they had previously planted such information. Now we don’t even need spies ourselves. We’re fucking advertising.
    1. +1
      4 October 2015 13: 47
      And how can I object? No way. Although it’s possible to understand PR specialists. No ads, no grandmas
    2. +4
      4 October 2015 17: 23
      Quote: provincial
      at the time it came, they had previously planted such information. Now we don’t even need spies ourselves. We’re fucking advertising.

      So it’s only we didn’t know that there was secrecy all around. And the USSR also traded in arms and exported and supplied its allies to exhibitions (some of which sold them to the Americans quiet, but for us these were secrets), although the export weapons were different from those delivered to weapons, but still not critical.
      I remember seeing a map in my unit with the "Secret" stamp, receiving and quartering troops in the event of a war. And then I saw this map in the Military & Defense - Business Insider magazine and now we really don't know anything, just have time to shoot noodles on the Internet from your ears. So general pictures and a little bit of a seed, starting from missiles and ending with weapons of special units
      .
  3. +3
    4 October 2015 12: 53
    Well, the launcher was installed on the new chassis. And transport-loading, SOC, on-load tap-changer?
  4. -3
    4 October 2015 14: 27
    Bulgaria would have these beauties, sort of 24-30 pieces. Dreams Dreams...
    1. +2
      4 October 2015 14: 28
      Quote: ivanovbg
      Bulgaria would have these beauties, that’s about 24-30

      And why do you need to defend against our aircraft.
      1. +1
        4 October 2015 15: 27
        Before we start shooting back with Bucks, someone must attack us. You are not going to do it yet. Over the past 800 years Bulgaria has had and still has only one likely "friend" - Turkey. We had, of course, disagreements with other neighbors, but this does not happen to anyone. You, too, fought, and then put up with different neighbors at different (historical) times.
        1. +3
          4 October 2015 17: 23
          Quote: ivanovbg
          Over the past 800 years Bulgaria has had and still has only one likely "friend" - Turkey.

          Over the past 130 years, the "brothers" have fought against Russia THREE TIMES!
        2. 0
          4 October 2015 17: 28
          Before we start shooting back with Bucks, someone must attack us. You are not going to do it yet. Over the past 800 years Bulgaria has had and still has only one likely "friend" - Turkey. We had, of course, disagreements with other neighbors, but this does not happen to anyone. You also fought, and then put up with different neighbors at different (historical) times

          we are not going to. But all of a sudden you "little brothers" wed .. you decide with your owners, as always
          1. +4
            4 October 2015 18: 07
            We did not leave the ATS and CMEA, the USSR came out of Eastern Europe and now are still indignant why are we in NATO and the EU? And because it cannot be otherwise, in geopolitics, as in nature, there are no empty places. NATO really wants to turn Bulgaria into a bridgehead for a strike against Russia. So far we have managed to get out, albeit with great difficulty. I don’t know what the politicians will decide about the territory of Bulgaria, but the Bulgarian people do not want and will not fight with you, even if you use such nicknames and call names.
            1. +4
              4 October 2015 18: 29
              Forgive my brother for insulting words, many of us forget that politicians and people are two different things. Although 3 times it was still ... Yes, and after Krajina, we begin to look at a lot of things differently.
              1. +7
                4 October 2015 18: 42
                Everything is in order, Alex, no offense :) I also have to admit that some of my fellow citizens do not want you well, but there are such people everywhere, you also have enough home-grown liberals. In general and in general - the Bulgarian people for Russia, I would like the Russians to know this.
                1. +1
                  5 October 2015 01: 36
                  I hope that our peoples will have the opportunity to talk and settle everything so that they can continue without rubbish and together to success. Good luck to you also hi
                  Special thanks for the article "16255 tons. Bulgarian uranium for the USSR", it was interesting good
              2. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  5. +3
    4 October 2015 15: 13
    Well, the MZKT will probably be with orders - you need to support allies!
  6. 0
    4 October 2015 23: 19
    A gas pipe was bought from a Belarusian father - bought. Well, redeem the MZKT - this is a worthwhile venture.
  7. 0
    5 October 2015 01: 35
    Questions:
    - What are the features of the new chassis?
    - What is the fundamental difference between the rocket launcher itself?
    I, of course, suspect that the answer will be "Browse the sites and make a comparison." However, if after the review article you still need to review and review, then why do you need this review? Isn't it easier to stupidly throw a link to some news resource, and keep silent in a rag yourself?
    And the pictures are good!
    1. 0
      5 October 2015 11: 50
      Feature in cost. A wheeled chassis is cheaper than a crawler. And the mileage resource is greater. But for these benefits you have to pay permeability.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"