Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation shares plans for putting into service the Bastion DBK

22
During a meeting in the main military department, Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu announced that during 5-6 years, coastal missile units would be completely re-equipped. In particular, by the end of the current coastal units of the Russian Navy will receive five complexes "Bastion". Statements by Sergei Shoigu leads RIA News:
By the end of the year, two Bastion complexes will arrive at the Northern and Pacific fleets (three complexes have already entered service with the coastal units).


Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation shares plans for putting into service the Bastion DBK


According to the Russian Minister of Defense, in the 2016, the Russian Navy will also arm itself with five new coastal missile systems, after which this kind of weapons will be supplied to the troops in the amount of four complexes annually.

Sergey Shoigu:
As a result, before 2021, we will be able to completely re-equip the coastal missile units with modern weapons.


BRK Bastion is a missile system equipped with anti-ship missiles. Maximum ammunition - 24 missiles. Bastion provides 600 km of coastline protection against enemy amphibious operations. Time to bring BRK into combat readiness - no more than five minutes.

In 2011, two Bastion coastal missile systems were sent to Syria. And in March 2014, the Bastion complexes were deployed in the Crimea.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    22 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +13
      29 September 2015 14: 04
      Will "Bastion" in full! Instead of shore batteries!
      In general, they would have to add to Syria! And to IRAN !!!! And check in a real mess, in the Red Sea!
      1. +7
        29 September 2015 14: 06
        not the topic. once again over Poros, this patient broke through to the baobab and asked when he would invite him to the Crimea. Madhouse. Of course, the pale-faced man was ofigel himself. I’m used to talking to morons, but even this shocked him laughing
        1. +26
          29 September 2015 14: 11
          Okay so .... hi
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. +2
          29 September 2015 14: 14
          He’s a holy fool. Why are they surprised? The most real ghoul. On the pitchfork or hounds to drive. He drank so much blood ...
          1. The comment was deleted.
      2. 0
        29 September 2015 17: 30
        In total, as I understand it, 30 complexes will be delivered before 2021.
    2. +3
      29 September 2015 14: 06
      Greed, of course, is not a vice ...., but I want it quickly and most importantly, more.
      1. +3
        29 September 2015 14: 15
        Quote: ssn18
        Greed, of course, is not a vice ...., but I want it quickly and most importantly, more.

        Everything will be ...! There is a base ..
    3. +7
      29 September 2015 14: 06
      hello "Izumo" and other Japanese rooks
    4. 0
      29 September 2015 14: 09
      It would not hurt to put the Kuril Islands in the Kaliningrad region. To the Japanese and Europeans reduce ardor.
    5. dsi
      0
      29 September 2015 14: 11
      As a result, before 2021, we will be able to completely re-equip the coastal missile units with modern weapons.

      I am tormented by the question, but in 2021 will these complexes still be modern?
      1. +3
        29 September 2015 14: 23
        and is there something better created in the world at the moment? even no analogues yet.
        1. dsi
          +2
          29 September 2015 17: 02
          even no analogues yet.

          If there were only idiots on the other side, we would not consider them a probable adversary.
    6. +3
      29 September 2015 14: 11
      Took the car in the Crimea. I drove it all! And some of the most beautiful views of the Crimea, were against the backdrop of the Bastions that rose on the coast)))
      1. +10
        29 September 2015 14: 21
        ------------------
    7. +2
      29 September 2015 14: 12
      The name is unambiguously accurate: "Bastion". Fuck the road to the collar, not a breakthrough of our positions.
    8. +8
      29 September 2015 14: 12
      Nobody has heard the Japanese still talk about the Kuril Islands?
      1. 0
        29 September 2015 14: 24
        they did not stop.
      2. +3
        29 September 2015 14: 36
        Quote: vovanpain
        Nobody has heard the Japanese still talk about the Kuril Islands?

        Still want to change to a peace treaty. However, this agreement is just a paper formality, and the islands here are the most real, complete with the marine economic zone, so the proposal is uninteresting.
        It remains for them, only one thing, to consider this subject from different angles:
        1. +1
          29 September 2015 15: 02
          A prostitute invites a client with such a figure in Japan. How can the Japanese evaluate this figure?
          1. +2
            29 September 2015 16: 09
            Quote: Amurets
            A prostitute invites a client with such a figure in Japan. How can the Japanese evaluate this figure?

            We are not in Japan and their opinion does not interest anyone.
    9. +1
      29 September 2015 14: 13
      Quote: Lt. Air Force stock
      It would not hurt to put the Kuril Islands in the Kaliningrad region. To the Japanese and Europeans reduce ardor.

      I agree to Kaliningrad, no Kuril Islands, the range allows you to shoot from deeper places
      1. +1
        29 September 2015 14: 20
        I wonder if it is possible, for example, to load cruise missiles from the Iskander complex into the Bastion, their car looks similar?
        If it would be nice to put such missiles in Syria to retaliate against the Israeli regime in cases of its aggression against this country.
        1. +3
          29 September 2015 15: 30
          And why? Yakhont-M in the aviation version can be used for ground targets see the link OTRK "Yakhont" lemur59.ru You cannot put a missile from Iskander in BASTION, everything is different. It's easier to think and make a ground launch of Yakhont-M.
    10. 0
      29 September 2015 14: 17
      Good distance. Correct. Did I understand correctly that the radius of the Bastion is 300 km? Well, yes, Yakhont is in the same place. What is it now, closer than 300 km to the shore will it be dangerous for an adversary to swim? It will get far from the Crimea. In combination with long-range aviation, it is beautiful. Why, the Black Sea is our internal one, and there is nothing here ...
      1. 0
        29 September 2015 14: 30
        Good distance. Right

        Not enough. The main supporter is armed with "Tomahawks" and aviation, which flies much further than 300 km. But I think he can screw up the landing operation.
    11. 0
      29 September 2015 14: 28
      Where does he get target designation from? There were rumors that we had nothing left of reconnaissance aircraft (Tu-95RTs, Tu-142) and, say, there were none at the World Championships (to the question of Crimea). The status of "Liana" is also not entirely clear: has it been commissioned already or not?
    12. 0
      29 September 2015 15: 48
      BRK Bastion is a missile system equipped with anti-ship missiles. Maximum ammunition - 24 missiles. Bastion provides 600 km of coastline protection against enemy amphibious operations. Time to bring BRK into combat readiness - no more than five minutes.

      Put 4 complexes in the Crimea, near Kaliningrad and on Sakhalin with the Kuril Islands - and everyone (except the neighbors, of course) will be fine
    13. 0
      29 September 2015 16: 19
      Quote: fregina1
      In general, they would still add to Syria!

      To add them there, they need to be covered from the air, S-300/400, otherwise there will be no sense, they will pick it up from the air.
      But they will not be allowed to put air defense there - the stench will be to heaven ...
    14. +1
      29 September 2015 17: 08
      Well, since it is still difficult for us with "sworn friends" to compete "in surface ships", it is quite reasonable to "squeeze their fervor" with the help of anti-ship missiles.
    15. 0
      29 September 2015 19: 14
      Quote: fregina1
      Will "Bastion" in full! Instead of coastal batteries! In general, they should add more to Syria

      They have been in Syria for about 5 years, so what? What did they, like anti-ship systems in Syria, do this?

      Quote: MIKHAN
      Everything will be ...! There is a base

      More ??? Will not be. Damn, you at least understand that there is such a thing as a state, a staffing table. And if the division consists of 4 PU, then at least spit with screaming "more" - there WILL NOT BE ANY MORE

      Quote: maximNNX
      hello "Izumo" and other Japanese rooks

      Will accept, hello. especially if they are not within the reach of "Bastion", And they will block this zone with their own means. Then really hello ...
      1. 0
        29 September 2015 23: 16
        They have been in Syria for about 5 years, so what? What did they, like anti-ship systems in Syria, do this?

        Actually, in Syria they really have absolutely nothing to do. Officially, Syria is fighting only with the rebels and ISIS there are all kinds of ships, which simply do not have ships worthy of anti-ship missiles.

        Anyone there NATO "Bastions", perhaps, to some extent on the nerves, but hardly critical: all sides are well aware that if at least one missile flies towards NATO ships, then Assad will begin concrete troubles.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"