Military Review

Russian Defense Ministry shares plans to put on armament BRK "Bastion"

22
During a meeting in the main military department, Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu announced that during 5-6 years, coastal missile units would be completely re-equipped. In particular, by the end of the current coastal units of the Russian Navy will receive five complexes "Bastion". Statements by Sergei Shoigu leads RIA News:
By the end of the year, two Bastion complexes will arrive at the Northern and Pacific fleets (three complexes have already entered service with the coastal units).



Russian Defense Ministry shares plans to put on armament BRK "Bastion"


According to the Russian Minister of Defense, in the 2016, the Russian Navy will also arm itself with five new coastal missile systems, after which this kind of weapons will be supplied to the troops in the amount of four complexes annually.

Sergey Shoigu:
As a result, before 2021, we will be able to completely re-equip the coastal missile units with modern weapons.


BRK Bastion is a missile system equipped with anti-ship missiles. Maximum ammunition - 24 missiles. Bastion provides 600 km of coastline protection against enemy amphibious operations. Time to bring BRK into combat readiness - no more than five minutes.

In 2011, two Bastion coastal missile systems were sent to Syria. And in March 2014, the Bastion complexes were deployed in the Crimea.
22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. fregina1
    fregina1 29 September 2015 14: 04 New
    +13
    Will "Bastionit" to the fullest! Instead of shore batteries!
    In general, they would have to add to Syria! And to IRAN !!!! And check in a real mess, in the Red Sea!
    1. Sterlya
      Sterlya 29 September 2015 14: 06 New
      +7
      not the topic. once again over Poros, this patient broke through to the baobab and asked when he would invite him to the Crimea. Madhouse. Of course, the pale-faced man was ofigel himself. I’m used to talking to morons, but even this shocked him laughing
      1. MIKHAN
        MIKHAN 29 September 2015 14: 11 New
        +26
        Okay so .... hi
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. vkl-47
        vkl-47 29 September 2015 14: 14 New
        +2
        He’s a holy fool. Why are they surprised? The most real ghoul. On the pitchfork or hounds to drive. He drank so much blood ...
        1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 29 September 2015 17: 30 New
      0
      In total, as I understand it, 30 complexes will be delivered before 2021.
  2. ssn18
    ssn18 29 September 2015 14: 06 New
    +3
    Greed, of course, is not a vice ...., but I want it quickly and most importantly, more.
    1. MIKHAN
      MIKHAN 29 September 2015 14: 15 New
      +3
      Quote: ssn18
      Greed, of course, is not a vice ...., but I want it quickly and most importantly, more.

      Everything will be ...! There is a base ..
  3. maxim1987
    maxim1987 29 September 2015 14: 06 New
    +7
    hi "Izumo" and other Japanese rooks
  4. Lt. Air Force stock
    Lt. Air Force stock 29 September 2015 14: 09 New
    0
    It would not hurt to put the Kuril Islands in the Kaliningrad region. To the Japanese and Europeans reduce ardor.
  5. dsi
    dsi 29 September 2015 14: 11 New
    0
    As a result, before 2021, we will be able to completely re-equip the coastal missile units with modern weapons.

    I am tormented by the question, but in 2021 will these complexes still be modern?
    1. shans2
      shans2 29 September 2015 14: 23 New
      +3
      and is there something better created in the world at the moment? even no analogues yet.
      1. dsi
        dsi 29 September 2015 17: 02 New
        +2
        even no analogues yet.

        If there were only idiots on the other side, we would not consider them a probable adversary.
  6. Berrik
    Berrik 29 September 2015 14: 11 New
    +3
    Took the car in the Crimea. I drove it all! And some of the most beautiful views of the Crimea, were against the backdrop of the Bastions that rose on the coast)))
    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz 29 September 2015 14: 21 New
      +10
      ------------------
  7. V.ic
    V.ic 29 September 2015 14: 12 New
    +2
    The name is uniquely accurate: "Bastion." Fuck the hell out of the collar, not the breakthrough of our positions.
  8. vovanpain
    vovanpain 29 September 2015 14: 12 New
    +8
    Nobody has heard the Japanese still talk about the Kuril Islands?
    1. shans2
      shans2 29 September 2015 14: 24 New
      0
      they did not stop.
    2. GRAY
      GRAY 29 September 2015 14: 36 New
      +3
      Quote: vovanpain
      Nobody has heard the Japanese still talk about the Kuril Islands?

      Still want to change to a peace treaty. However, this agreement is just a paper formality, and the islands here are the most real, complete with the marine economic zone, so the proposal is uninteresting.
      It remains for them, only one thing, to consider this subject from different angles:
      1. Amurets
        Amurets 29 September 2015 15: 02 New
        +1
        A prostitute invites a client with such a figure in Japan. How can the Japanese evaluate this figure?
        1. GRAY
          GRAY 29 September 2015 16: 09 New
          +2
          Quote: Amurets
          A prostitute invites a client with such a figure in Japan. How can the Japanese evaluate this figure?

          We are not in Japan and their opinion does not interest anyone.
  9. chikenous59
    chikenous59 29 September 2015 14: 13 New
    +1
    Quote: Lt. Air Force stock
    It would not hurt to put the Kuril Islands in the Kaliningrad region. To the Japanese and Europeans reduce ardor.

    I agree to Kaliningrad, no Kuril Islands, the range allows you to shoot from deeper places
    1. padded jacket
      padded jacket 29 September 2015 14: 20 New
      +1
      It’s interesting, for example, can cruise missiles from the Iskander complex be loaded into the Bastion, do they look like their car?
      If it would be nice to put such missiles in Syria to retaliate against the Israeli regime in cases of its aggression against this country.
      1. Amurets
        Amurets 29 September 2015 15: 30 New
        +3
        Why? Yakhont-M in the aviation version can be used for ground targets, see link OTRK "Yakhont" lemur59.ru You can’t put a missile from Iskander into BASTION, everything else. It’s easier to think and make a ground launch of Yakhont-M.
  10. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 29 September 2015 14: 17 New
    0
    Good distance. Correct. Did I understand correctly that the radius of the Bastion is 300 km? Well, yes, there is Yakhont. What is it now that closer to 300 km to the shore it will be dangerous for an adversary to swim? From the Crimea will get far. In combination with long-range aviation - beautiful. And what, the Black Sea is our inland, and there is nothing here ...
    1. Kalmar
      Kalmar 29 September 2015 14: 30 New
      0
      Good distance. Right

      Not enough. The main suppost is armed with Tomahawks and aircraft, which fly much further than 300km. But I think he will be able to screw up the landing operation.
  11. Kalmar
    Kalmar 29 September 2015 14: 28 New
    0
    And where does he get the target designation from? It was rumored that we had only reconnaissance aircraft (Tu-95RTs, Tu-142) and, say, they didn’t exist at the World Cup (on the issue of Crimea). The status of "Liana" is also not entirely clear: is it already operational or not?
  12. nazar_0753
    nazar_0753 29 September 2015 15: 48 New
    0
    BRK Bastion is a missile system equipped with anti-ship missiles. Maximum ammunition - 24 missiles. Bastion provides 600 km of coastline protection against enemy amphibious operations. Time to bring BRK into combat readiness - no more than five minutes.

    Put 4 complexes in the Crimea, near Kaliningrad and on Sakhalin with the Kuril Islands - and everyone (except the neighbors, of course) will be fine
  13. Leeder
    Leeder 29 September 2015 16: 19 New
    0
    Quote: fregina1
    In general, they would still add to Syria!

    To add them there, they need to be covered from the air, S-300/400, otherwise there will be no sense, they will pick it up from the air.
    But they will not be allowed to put air defense there - the stench will be to heaven ...
  14. Aandrewsir
    Aandrewsir 29 September 2015 17: 08 New
    +1
    Well, since it’s still hard for us to “swear friends” to compete “on surface ships”, it’s quite reasonable to “squeeze their combat ardor” with anti-ship missiles.
  15. Old26
    Old26 29 September 2015 19: 14 New
    0
    Quote: fregina1
    Will "Bastionit" to the fullest! Instead of coastal batteries! In general, they would still add to Syria

    They have been in Syria for about 5 years, so what? What did they, like anti-ship systems in Syria, do this?

    Quote: MIKHAN
    Everything will be ...! There is a base

    More ??? Will not be. Damn, do you even understand that there is such a thing as staff, staffing. And if the division consists of 4 PUs, then at least go out with saliva with yelling “more” - there won’t be any MORE

    Quote: maximNNX
    hi "Izumo" and other Japanese rooks

    Hello, welcome. especially if they are not within the reach of the Bastion, And they will block this zone with their own funds. Then really hi ...
    1. Kalmar
      Kalmar 29 September 2015 23: 16 New
      0
      They have been in Syria for about 5 years, so what? What did they, like anti-ship systems in Syria, do this?

      Actually, in Syria they really have absolutely nothing to do. Officially, Syria is fighting only with the rebels and ISIS there are all kinds of ships, which simply do not have ships worthy of anti-ship missiles.

      NATO “Bastions” may be there to some extent, but hardly critical: all parties are well aware that if at least one missile flies towards the NATO ships, Assad will begin concrete troubles.